unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

I, Consumer

farheen zehra January 5, 2007

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 80-96   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

#49 Posted by malik99 on January 7, 2007 9:52:23 am
tahmed #44 ``instead of resorting to personal insults to hamidm ``

Is comparing hamidm sahib to Michael Jackson a personal insult? Are you differentiating between who is a ``good`` white and who is a ``bad`` white?

I thought being white was all that mattered. Now I am confused.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#52 Posted by hamidm2 on January 7, 2007 10:06:01 am
Re: # 49

malik sahib,

......... i really don`t mind you comparing me to michael jackson - the man just got a little carried away in his attempt to repair god`s shoddy workmanship ....... and regardless of the passion for boys that he shares with our turkic ancestors and bedouin prophets, he is a still a great entertainer ...........

........ i must find my copy of the baburnama to see what babur had to say about the virtues of a fair complexion and his disgust for the dark-skinned natives of india ........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#48 Posted by tahmed32 on January 7, 2007 9:49:33 am
#47 malik: hamidm could not, even if he wanted to, sing and dance on chowk. and in addition, he is not paid to be of service on chowk. he is here to kill some time chatting, and and if he can do this with good humor without being personally offensive, more power to him.

so, dont confuse things by comparing two very different situations.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#47 Posted by malik99 on January 7, 2007 9:46:51 am
tahmed # 41 writes - ``the fact is that blacks seem to seeking attention ..... (talking loudly in public places as if everyone around is interested in their witticisms, .... while singing and dancing .... as if they are paid to be glamorous ...This has nothing to do with skin color but merely an attempt at compensating for an inferiority complex resulting from a history of being treated like subhumans``

This very much defines Hamidm`s behaviour on chowk.....he too tries to come across as being witty, as if we really care what this nigger has to say.

I had already diagnosed his behaviour to be resulting from a history of our ancestors being treated like subhumans. But I guess I am not white enough for him to take my diagnosis seriously.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#62 Posted by mohar11 on January 7, 2007 12:57:17 pm
Hamidm

Malik99 has a point... :)... looks like you are trying to be more loyal than the king... whites themselves love to get a brown skin which is why they so hanker after getting tans - even at the risk of skin cancer and what not... and here you are waxing lyrical on white skin... :)

Michale jackosn was crazy - so are you... nothing is more beautiful than the brown/dark skin... Halley Berry beats evey white woman hands down... :)

Get over it dude - you are one confused macaca...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#46 Posted by tahmed32 on January 7, 2007 9:44:09 am
#43 hamidm: and ever seen those blobs of white skin in gyms?? beautiful?? give me a break!! think ``healthy``, not ``skin color``.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#45 Posted by tahmed32 on January 7, 2007 9:43:05 am
#43 hamidm: what is ``better looking``?? beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and your notion of beauty is way too simplistic. How else do you explain that black models are paid millions to get photographed??
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#44 Posted by tahmed32 on January 7, 2007 9:40:36 am
malik#40 instead of resorting to personal insults to hamidm (which say nothing about hamidm, and plenty about you) if you have a reasonable argument, present it. every man has a right to an opinion presented in a reasonable manner - and if you cant respect that, then you are just another bakra that seeks to follow the herd and cant stand to see someone you consider to be a bakra like yourself straying from the herd and so resorts to namecalling.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#41 Posted by tahmed32 on January 7, 2007 9:27:28 am
hamidm: White + Tan = Brown. :-)

You are merely associating civilized behavior and outlooks with white and primitive behavior and outlooks with black. Behavior has nothing to do with skin color.

I dont care about political correctness - which I consider to be merely a way to avoid ugly facts. Thus, while this is like saying the emperor has no clothes, the fact is that blacks seem to seeking attention in public places in the US (talking loudly in public places as if everyone around is interested in their witticisms, ignoring the customer while singing and dancing behind the cash register as if they are paid to be glamorous rather than provide service - all of which I have seen. This has nothing to do with skin color but merely an attempt at compensating for an inferiority complex resulting from a history of being treated like subhumans. Some of the most dignified blacks I have seen have been in Africa, e.g., one of whom even pointed out to me when I was visiting Africa his disgust with such behavior on the part of some american blacks. but dont confuse behavior, which in turn stems from historical circumstances, with skin color
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#61 Posted by saminasha2 on January 7, 2007 12:37:08 pm
Re: # 41

tahmed unkil,

because working at duane reade`s calls for the utmost decorum? After eight hours of working with us, entitled Americans who bumrush every newly opened register, have intricately detailed explanations of why we havent returned product A until 10 months after we purchased it, doddering old women who have 10 coupons and decide they dont want 11 of B product because...whatever the heck the reason is, whiny toddlers knocking boxes of eye cream over (i made my nephew pick up the boxes and put them back)...if I were working at a Duane Reade, you`d better hope I was doing whatever I could to not hang myself.....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#43 Posted by hamidm2 on January 7, 2007 9:40:30 am
Re: # 41

tahmed,

.......... i am not talking about behavior or attitude - that is a totally different discussion ........ i am simply talking about aesthetics : barack obama is better looking than charley rangle and harold ford is better looking than obama - the more white blood you have, are the better looking you get .......... it is just chemistry, for god`s sake !

........ and please don`t make me dig through ancient urdu and persian poetry to prove my point that this is a universal standard that precedes the colonial era ........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#58 Posted by saminasha2 on January 7, 2007 12:26:54 pm
Re: # 43

may i point out that the great harems of the zoroastrian and middle east valued beauty in the full spectrum of hue-especially when women were valued for beauty, proficiency in court arts and the ability to reproduce male heirs. You need only to look at the great civilizations of Egypt, Mali, Songhai and Timbuktu to know that African women were valued in their cultures as the zenith of beauty, regardless of European conceptions of beauty.

Can you or would you want to imagine Naomi Campbell even a shade lighter?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#59 Posted by saminasha2 on January 7, 2007 12:30:11 pm
Re: # 58

great harem meaning harems that contained hundreds of women in dehumanizing sexual servitude to one extremely rich male (eye roll)

and great civilization meaning fully developed in arts, sciences, literacy, socio-economic and political organization. Egypt is a case in point.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#40 Posted by malik99 on January 7, 2007 9:05:44 am
Hamidm Sahib –

I always thought you were born in a wrong religion and a wrong country. But after seeing your interacts on this board, it is clear as day that you were born in wrong skin too. Maybe that explains your relentless attempts to act whiter than whites, since you could not be one physically.

You, Hamdim Sahib, are the Michael Jackson of Chowk......except that he managed to look whiter than whites and even have off-springs from white women. Whereas all you, the pseudo-white Hamdim, have to show for your whiteness are your worthless promotions of democracy, western values, and western dresses.

What a loser!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#42 Posted by hamidm2 on January 7, 2007 9:32:55 am
Re: # 40

malik sahib,

Roo-e-sukhan kisi kee taraf ho to roo-siyaah
Sauda nahin, junoon nahin, vaihshat nahin mujhey

If I have made a sarcastic comment on any body my face be black
I am neither demented, nor lunatic nor savage

............. are you suggesting that ghalib was born in the wrong skin ?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#38 Posted by hamidm2 on January 7, 2007 8:30:12 am


tahmed,

....... you are never going to get me to back down from my position that white, specially with a nice tan, is more beautiful than black ....... it has got nothing to do with colonial politics as malik suggested, it is all about aesthetics .......... i know it is not politically correct to say such things - specially when ms saminasha is around - but it is the goddamn truth and no amount of denial is going to make the truth go away ......... i don`t care how healthy a body and mind you have, if you look like gandhiji nobody is going to bed with you, unless you can talk a poor niece into it ...........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 80-96   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Interact Index

    #134 IamNadia
    #135 IamNadia
    #133 Karachi01
    #132 ballukhan
    #131 tahmed32
    #130 Salim_Chauhan
    #129 Salim_Chauhan
    #128 soysauce
    #127 masadi
    #126 chaltahai
    #124 arjun2
    #125 saminasha2
    #123 khurram
    #121 tahmed32
    #122 saminasha2
    #120 saminasha2
    #119 saminasha2
    #118 zeemax
    #117 arjun2
    #116 zeemax
    #115 IamNadia
    #114 tahmed32
    #113 zeemax
    #112 tahmed32
    #111 tahmed32
    #110 tahmed32
    #109 aslam644
    #108 Ranjit
    #107 Sobia
    #106 scout_new
    #105 Salim_Chauhan
    #104 Salim_Chauhan
    #103 Salim_Chauhan
    #102 Salim_Chauhan
    #101 pokershark
    #100 stuka
    #99 stuka
    #98 stuka
    #97 Ranjit
    #96 arjun2
    #93 bulleya
    #92 tahmed32
    #91 arjun2
    #90 tahmed32
    #89 tahmed32
    #94 hamidm2
    #95 hamidm2
    #88 arjun2
    #86 stuka
    #87 hamidm2
    #85 tahmed32
    #84 tahmed32
    #83 ali_1
    #79 hamidm2
    #82 mohar11
    #78 saminasha2
    #80 hamidm2
    #77 Shah2
    #76 Ranjit
    #81 mohar11
    #75 Shah2
    #72 kaami
    #74 mohar11
    #70 Ranjit
    #73 mohar11
    #71 mohar11
    #69 tahmed32
    #67 tahmed32
    #66 sri
    #65 Ranjit
    #68 mohar11
    #63 malik99
    #64 mohar11
    #55 sri
    #60 scout_new
    #56 hamidm2
    #54 Faruk
    #53 sri
    #51 tahmed32
    #50 tahmed32
    #49 malik99
    #52 hamidm2
    #48 tahmed32
    #47 malik99
    #62 mohar11
    #46 tahmed32
    #45 tahmed32
    #44 tahmed32
    #41 tahmed32
    #61 saminasha2
    #43 hamidm2
    #58 saminasha2
    #59 saminasha2
    #40 malik99
    #42 hamidm2
    #38 hamidm2
    #57 saminasha2
    #37 tahmed32
    #36 tahmed32
    #35 tintingem
    #39 hamidm2
    #34 malikjahanzeb
    #28 nb
    #31 ahmedmadani
    #26 Ranjit
    #27 nb
    #29 ahmedmadani
    #30 ahmedmadani
    #25 scout_new
    #24 Shah2
    #23 Ranjit
    #20 tahmed32
    #21 saminasha2
    #18 Shah2
    #17 tahmed32
    #19 saminasha2
    #16 Shah2
    #15 Shah2
    #12 malik99
    #22 hamidm2
    #11 hamidm2
    #10 tahmed32
    #7 malik99
    #9 ahmedmadani
    #14 saminasha2
    #6 Ranjit
    #5 ballukhan
    #4 Love2love
    #3 Shah2
    #2 ahmedmadani
    #8 hamidm2
    #33 ahmedmadani
    #32 ahmedmadani
    #13 saminasha2
    #1 Minhaj

Latest Interacts

  • jayp: Re: # 19 tahmed, Paki civil... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
  • nb: I never knew until... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • _arjun30: heh... ‘Pakistan loses $1.5bn due... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • _arjun30: #64 Posted by... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • laddu: The more Islamist thinking... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • _arjun30: #48 Posted by... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • _arjun30: #51 Posted by... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • Urstruly: It came as a... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • ‘Dustbin of history’ or ‘history of sorts’
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Rape Survivor Families Struggle Against Odds
  • Better Times
  • Love at Shara Zawia
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • India Day Parade on Madison Avenue
  • On Cyberspace and Human Communication
  • Kashmir
  • Aunty Vilayatpasand Thinking Aloud
  • Pakistan Cinema 1947-1997: A Review

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited