Shahnawaz Farooqui February 21, 2007
#65 Posted by hamidm2 on February 23, 2007 9:37:12 am
Re: # 61
zeemax,
..... sorry, i can`t help you with this because i did`t watch any of it - i just can`t get intereseted in anna nicole because according to my value system anything over 36c is a waste ..........
..........but i am watching american idol religiously - it is serious business in our household and even though we sometimes have serious differnces on who to vote for, it has brought our family together in a wonderful way, it is almost miraculous! ......... but i do think that the situation between simon and paula is more serious than the security issue in baghdad and can cause a major crisis in this country? and what`s with ryan ?...... can you believe the hissy fit he threw just because simon called him sweetheart ?........ what is the world coming to !
zeemax,
..... sorry, i can`t help you with this because i did`t watch any of it - i just can`t get intereseted in anna nicole because according to my value system anything over 36c is a waste ..........
..........but i am watching american idol religiously - it is serious business in our household and even though we sometimes have serious differnces on who to vote for, it has brought our family together in a wonderful way, it is almost miraculous! ......... but i do think that the situation between simon and paula is more serious than the security issue in baghdad and can cause a major crisis in this country? and what`s with ryan ?...... can you believe the hissy fit he threw just because simon called him sweetheart ?........ what is the world coming to !
#66 Posted by hamidm2 on February 23, 2007 9:48:32 am
Re: # 62
urstruly,
you remind me of ted haggard, jimmy swaggert and jim bakker .......... i hope the resemblance is coincidental, but the rule has been proven to be true over and over again ..........
#67 Posted by Urstruly on February 23, 2007 9:59:54 am
Re: # 66
Would you care to explain why these three fine gentlemen are bad people?
Would you care to explain why these three fine gentlemen are bad people?
#68 Posted by impressions on February 23, 2007 10:10:00 am
Re: # 66
Hamid mian, I dont know why it was this particular banter that woke us up from our self imposed slumber but it did. We have some querries for your consideration.
1. Speaking of hot women and cooking shows, did you check out Top Chef? We would highly recommend this show to your family as it seamlessly combines Iron Chef with American Idol and provides for your viewing pleasure the amazing Padma Laxmi. If ever there was a reason to choose writing as a career, Salmaan Rushdie typifies it by having secured this godess even though he looks like a cross between Hammie from Over the Hedge and Hagrid from Harry Potter.
2. Do you think the desi community is voting en masse to keep that kid Sanjaya alive? That Rudy kid really got shafted!
We await your wisdom on these issues.
Impressions
Hamid mian, I dont know why it was this particular banter that woke us up from our self imposed slumber but it did. We have some querries for your consideration.
1. Speaking of hot women and cooking shows, did you check out Top Chef? We would highly recommend this show to your family as it seamlessly combines Iron Chef with American Idol and provides for your viewing pleasure the amazing Padma Laxmi. If ever there was a reason to choose writing as a career, Salmaan Rushdie typifies it by having secured this godess even though he looks like a cross between Hammie from Over the Hedge and Hagrid from Harry Potter.
2. Do you think the desi community is voting en masse to keep that kid Sanjaya alive? That Rudy kid really got shafted!
We await your wisdom on these issues.
Impressions
#69 Posted by hamidm2 on February 23, 2007 10:25:21 am
Re: # 67
urstruly,
they were bad people only because they said one thing and did another ...... they are guilty of lying and deception... other than that, there is nothing wrong with paying a prostitute for her services, being gay, or having an affair with the masjid secretary ( i think jim bakker was also gulity of having tammy for a wife and embezzling church money - which are, or should be, crimes) ........
urstruly,
they were bad people only because they said one thing and did another ...... they are guilty of lying and deception... other than that, there is nothing wrong with paying a prostitute for her services, being gay, or having an affair with the masjid secretary ( i think jim bakker was also gulity of having tammy for a wife and embezzling church money - which are, or should be, crimes) ........
#70 Posted by hamidm2 on February 23, 2007 10:47:04 am
Re: # 68
impressions,
........ i think you are right - the desi community probably did vote for the desi kid en masse but i don`t think rudy was much better (although he was definitely better than sundance - he is gone next round !)...... sanjaya didn`t pick the right song but he has a great voice and i think he is good for another round or two ......... at this point, i think chris sligh and lakisha jones are clearly in the lead although melinda doolittle was awsome and there is something about blake lewis ....... the girls are definitely stronger this year and jordin sparks might surprise everyone - she has one heck of a stage presence for a seventeen year old ........... it is still too early to tell
..... and i will definitely check out top chef, i am sure padma is a fine cook... thanks for the tip
impressions,
........ i think you are right - the desi community probably did vote for the desi kid en masse but i don`t think rudy was much better (although he was definitely better than sundance - he is gone next round !)...... sanjaya didn`t pick the right song but he has a great voice and i think he is good for another round or two ......... at this point, i think chris sligh and lakisha jones are clearly in the lead although melinda doolittle was awsome and there is something about blake lewis ....... the girls are definitely stronger this year and jordin sparks might surprise everyone - she has one heck of a stage presence for a seventeen year old ........... it is still too early to tell
..... and i will definitely check out top chef, i am sure padma is a fine cook... thanks for the tip
#71 Posted by Urstruly on February 23, 2007 10:51:20 am
Re: # 69
``they were bad people only because they said one thing and did another``
So in other words it is not a certain act that makes a person a bad person but lying about it does. For according to your standards, ted has become a fine person now since he has confessed being a gay. For all intent and purpose you shouldn`t be complaining about him now, shouldn`t you.
And in case of Bakker, he would have been a fine person too had he told everybody in advance that he was going to embezzel money from Church. Emebezzling is not a bad act, but lying about it is. Yep, the world would have been a better place had the emezzlers told in advance what they were going to do.
``they were bad people only because they said one thing and did another``
So in other words it is not a certain act that makes a person a bad person but lying about it does. For according to your standards, ted has become a fine person now since he has confessed being a gay. For all intent and purpose you shouldn`t be complaining about him now, shouldn`t you.
And in case of Bakker, he would have been a fine person too had he told everybody in advance that he was going to embezzel money from Church. Emebezzling is not a bad act, but lying about it is. Yep, the world would have been a better place had the emezzlers told in advance what they were going to do.
#72 Posted by hamidm2 on February 23, 2007 11:36:40 am
Re: # 71
urstruly,
..... don`t twist my words - i did say that embezzling was a crime, afterall it is another word for stealing .......... being gay is not a crime, but bashing gays is a crime and it is even worse if you are a gay yourself .........
.......... if it makes you feel any better, i put bill clinton and bill bennet in the same category ........ sex with a fat girl is not a crime and neither is gambling, but lying about it is (even though, personally i fnd one distasteful and the other sutpid) .....
urstruly,
..... don`t twist my words - i did say that embezzling was a crime, afterall it is another word for stealing .......... being gay is not a crime, but bashing gays is a crime and it is even worse if you are a gay yourself .........
.......... if it makes you feel any better, i put bill clinton and bill bennet in the same category ........ sex with a fat girl is not a crime and neither is gambling, but lying about it is (even though, personally i fnd one distasteful and the other sutpid) .....
#73 Posted by hamidm2 on February 23, 2007 11:41:55 am
Re: # 72
urstruly,
....... even though jesus might have said ``he that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her,” i think my father put it much much better whwn he was lecturing me on the harmful effects of smoking:
``he who does not have a bad habit is either an angel or a chootiya``
urstruly,
....... even though jesus might have said ``he that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her,” i think my father put it much much better whwn he was lecturing me on the harmful effects of smoking:
``he who does not have a bad habit is either an angel or a chootiya``
#74 Posted by muqaddam on February 23, 2007 12:10:19 pm
Re: #39
Years ago when I was in Kashmir, I happened to witness a pow wow between two Kashmiri women. As the verbal fight went on and got more intense, one of the women held one of her breasts with both her hands and shook it vigorously in the direction of her opponent at the same time issuing forth a lot of hot words which could only be surmised as expletives.
Can any Kashmiri Chowki throw light on the significance of this kind of gesturing? I was told it is a gesture often employed by Kashmiri women during their scraps with other women.
Years ago when I was in Kashmir, I happened to witness a pow wow between two Kashmiri women. As the verbal fight went on and got more intense, one of the women held one of her breasts with both her hands and shook it vigorously in the direction of her opponent at the same time issuing forth a lot of hot words which could only be surmised as expletives.
Can any Kashmiri Chowki throw light on the significance of this kind of gesturing? I was told it is a gesture often employed by Kashmiri women during their scraps with other women.
#75 Posted by dullabhatti on February 23, 2007 12:32:25 pm
#74 now this is an incident Urstruly would have captured better with his lowered gaze and raised video camera.:-)
#76 Posted by arjun2 on February 23, 2007 1:29:09 pm
urstruly lowers his gaze when he sees women...so he swings the other way? dayyyumn...what`s he going to do with his 72 virgins then?
#77 Posted by Zeena on February 23, 2007 1:58:22 pm
#56 zeemax sahib
This is the beauty of American tv that all of us are free to watch whatever. This is choose and pick.
I agree with you that anna nicole`s case is just shameful. I mean what an embarrassement for a woman who was not even sure of her daughter`s exact paternity.
All of a sudden all these shameless people appearing from every creek and corner for claiming the paternity. Anna nicole in my opinion was sleazy, drugged up bimbo who slept almost with every Tom, Dick and Harry.............
Pakistani and India TVs give me nothing but headaches.
This is the beauty of American tv that all of us are free to watch whatever. This is choose and pick.
I agree with you that anna nicole`s case is just shameful. I mean what an embarrassement for a woman who was not even sure of her daughter`s exact paternity.
All of a sudden all these shameless people appearing from every creek and corner for claiming the paternity. Anna nicole in my opinion was sleazy, drugged up bimbo who slept almost with every Tom, Dick and Harry.............
Pakistani and India TVs give me nothing but headaches.
#78 Posted by hamidm2 on February 23, 2007 2:23:49 pm
Re: # 77
zeena,
``I mean what an embarrassement for a woman who was not even sure of her daughter`s exact paternity``
........ but think about it, mary was not sure about her son`s paternity either ........
zeena,
``I mean what an embarrassement for a woman who was not even sure of her daughter`s exact paternity``
........ but think about it, mary was not sure about her son`s paternity either ........
#79 Posted by Urstruly on February 23, 2007 2:32:12 pm
Re: # 72
Bhai it is you who is twisting your own words. Just because you say that hypocisy is bad doesn`t make it so. In this age of reason what is `good` and `bad`. everything is relevant. So I advise you to refrain from this mullah terminology of good, bad and evil.
Now please explain to me how could you say that Ted haggard is a bad person. All he did was that he used to tell people to not do something (homosexuality), which is neither immoral nor illegal while doing it himself. Isn`t it like someone telling other not to eat candy while eating it himself. Is eating candy a crime or is it bad? I don`t think so. And so is not eating the candy. He is not hurting anyone, he is not stealing candy from anyone. Its not that anyone has ever died by not having candy. So if Ted tells me not to share tender moments with another man while he keeps doing it himself, instead of calling him a bad person I should expolre the reason why he is doing that. Probably he makes his living by doing that. Its not that I would leave my sleep over not having shared the bed with another man or anything. Similarly why would Clinton be a bad person when neither fornication nor adultery is a crime; it isn`t immoral either because morality or immorality has nho place in the age of reason. Clinton only lied because he would have lost his job because of vicious republicans. So he did the right and reaonable thing by lying. His lies were a victim less crime or a crime less crime.
Bhai it is you who is twisting your own words. Just because you say that hypocisy is bad doesn`t make it so. In this age of reason what is `good` and `bad`. everything is relevant. So I advise you to refrain from this mullah terminology of good, bad and evil.
Now please explain to me how could you say that Ted haggard is a bad person. All he did was that he used to tell people to not do something (homosexuality), which is neither immoral nor illegal while doing it himself. Isn`t it like someone telling other not to eat candy while eating it himself. Is eating candy a crime or is it bad? I don`t think so. And so is not eating the candy. He is not hurting anyone, he is not stealing candy from anyone. Its not that anyone has ever died by not having candy. So if Ted tells me not to share tender moments with another man while he keeps doing it himself, instead of calling him a bad person I should expolre the reason why he is doing that. Probably he makes his living by doing that. Its not that I would leave my sleep over not having shared the bed with another man or anything. Similarly why would Clinton be a bad person when neither fornication nor adultery is a crime; it isn`t immoral either because morality or immorality has nho place in the age of reason. Clinton only lied because he would have lost his job because of vicious republicans. So he did the right and reaonable thing by lying. His lies were a victim less crime or a crime less crime.
#80 Posted by hamidm2 on February 23, 2007 2:58:15 pm
Re: # 79
urstruly,
..... i am not going to debate the virtues of homosexaulity and candy-eating with you ........ all i was trying to point out is that people who raise shrill and loud voices against `sin` are usually doing it to cover up their own tortured feelings of guilt as in the ted haggard and jimmy swaggert .........
urstruly,
..... i am not going to debate the virtues of homosexaulity and candy-eating with you ........ all i was trying to point out is that people who raise shrill and loud voices against `sin` are usually doing it to cover up their own tortured feelings of guilt as in the ted haggard and jimmy swaggert .........
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- Aha_Snark: Re: # 230 usmi... Pleas For Sanity as
- nb: #230 yellow eyed stone... Pleas For Sanity as
- akcheema: Re: # 232; levitate why... Pleas For Sanity as
- nkg: Re: # 4 chalta... this the... I Am A Pakistani
- Levitate: MaheshG ... dead hindoos... Pleas For Sanity as
- MaheshG: What happened in Gujarat... Pleas For Sanity as
- usmi: It is quite interesting... Pleas For Sanity as
- Levitate: nkg... dead hindoos :)... Pleas For Sanity as








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content