Raiwind IX

#207 ``no more live pakistan cricket team``

are you planning to make them all dead then?

Re: # 205 Tahmed

Nahin Janaab, shukriya. Chai aap peeyen apney jihadi zunooni bhateejey Zeemax key saath. I am content with my cup of Glenmorangie.

Curiously you never get peeved at Pakis posting pictures of dead Indian soldiers.

Re: # 208

Dear tahmed:

My nationalism is confined to the Indian cricket team ..... so do allow me to rant. It may be the same for quite a few others ..... so the day is ours. WE SHALL RANT - THE WORLD IS COMMING TO AN END :(

Some interesting observations regarding the World Cup matches.



Started by Salim_Chauhan on March 18, 2007 9:22am PT

Sun Tani and Jeemax,

I have been following your wet dreams about a united Poonzab and honestly, I find myself in total agreement with you. The forced departure of the noble Sikhs from West Punjab created a vacuum that has resulted in this unfortunate half century of hooliganism, PPP misbehavior, corruption, and deadly violence. The brave Sikhs had a history of administration and culture and provided a rule of law and order under the glorious Sikha Shahi based in Lahore.

Having said that, I noticed several problems and being land-locked would be the least of your miseries. I have been following the interesting results of the world cup cricket matches in Maghribi (Pachim) Hindustan. Here are some observations:

Physique was not a factor in the outcome of the two significant matches - The team with the better physique won in the Ireland/Pakistan match, but the team with the better physique was defeated in the Bangladesh/India contest.

Height was not a factor - the taller Irish beat the shorter Pakis, but the shorter Bengalis beat the taller Injuns.

Skin color was also not a factor - the white-skinned Irish beat the dark Pakis, but the dark-skinned Bengalis whipped the lighter-skinned Injuns.

Islam was definitely not a factor - the Catholic Irish beat the crap out of the Muslim Pakis (including a recycled apostate), but the entirely Muslim Bengalis humiliated the mostly Hindu Injuns (there was only one Muslim on the losing Injun side).

The number of Punjoo players on each team was a definite factor - The victorious Irish included no Punjus, the losing Pakis were mostly PPP (Paki Punju Paindoos). The successful Bengalis included no Punjus, but the defeated Injuns had a few Punjus. The side with the most Punjus performed the poorest of all four.

These are the facts - now do you really want a united Punjab and field a team consisting of ALL Punjus?

by atif2 on March 18, 2007 5:08am PT
#11 - excuse me injun! pakistan was defeated by just 3 wickets. India got clobbered by 5 (FIVE!) wickets
take that! ``}

So, the PPPs are down to this?
Claiming victory over the Injuns for having only three wickets inserted up their ass instead of the 5 the Injuns inhaled rectally.

Salim the Great Chauhan:

Do not make fun of us - the jingoistic cricket lovers. Not today! I wish Pakistan had won, at least then I could throw my bile (with a very high alcohol content) at them .... bloody loosers all of them. Where are the Bangladeshis on this site ... if no one comes forth then Subroto shall qualify.

We have been partying in GT`s place all night and we kicked his ass real hard. We shall win the cup
- Amanul

#%@**&^
chowk staff delete 214.

#209 curiously you never get peeved at Pakis posting pictures of dead Indian soldiers.

first, only zeemax does that as far as i have seen. second, i in fact did ``get peeved`` with zeemax on that. third, far from getting peeved, i was offering you and arjun a tea break, since you were getting breathless in ranting about pakis.

i just thought i would correct your factual errors. you can now go back to voicing your contempt for us cowardly pakis and your Great Victory of 1971.

#194/6 subhashjoshi,

Mr. bhindidick, these photos don`t tickle us at all because we`ve been seeing them since 1971 in both the Pakistan press as well as the Pakistan TV ... :~)

The offensive character who sent 214 had not even btushed his teeth when he did so. An now my wife and kids are off with them to have some stinking indian food .. i need a drink to soote my hedache.

#209 by subhashjoshi

Curiously you never get peeved at Pakis posting pictures of dead Indian soldiers.

You mean this one?



Or like this?



Or even this?

Re: # 219

zee, you stink.

peemax is all talk and no action..typical of pakis..it`s just like behram who pretended to be a hotshot entrepreneur but was outed as an affirmative action small time contractor..peemax himself is a brit-paki..which means he is probably on welfare and his kids are at the bottom of the educational ladder..

if all of peemax`s braggadocio was actually true and pakis really did have any intestinal fortitude, kashmir would have banega`ed pakiland by now, wouldn`t it?

Re: # 221

k might not have banega Pakistan but India stinks ... we lost to bong land, what can be worse? you stink too like zee.

#213 by GT

GT, BDs are great cricketers, particularly in batting. There were some in our corporate cricket team a while ago and I was amazed. All they needed was confidence and some coaching which they`ve got now. I have no doubt they`ll emerge as another Sri Lanka.

As for Ireland/Pak, everyone knows Pak was a sort of a `B` team and in fact they shouldn`t have participated in WC at all with such an understrenghth team as many had suggested. Pak`s strength is and has always been bowling, and they don`t have a single world class bowler right now. On the other hand, India`s is a full-strength team which was roasted by the BDs. They`ll have to wok hard in the coming matches.