With or Without Musharraf – A Mohajir’s Perspective

#717 HisExcellency {``Instead of recognizing facts, the author pursued his agenda of distancing Mohajirs from this era. Even silly statements were made. For example, the author informed us that Liaqat Ali Khan was Punjabi. (He was actually born at Karnal in UP).

Your Excellency,
Karnal was in Punjab province at the time of the 1947 partition. It is now in Haryana. Just this one gross mistake on your part is a clear indication of your twisting of geographical, historical, and sociological facts that you have misrepresented to further your ethnic, racist, and bigoted agenda.

If you are caught making such an outlandish representation, is there any point in responding to the rest of your nonsense? Your attempt to classify me as an Indian Hindu or a post `71 Mohajir is merely an admission that your arguments have failed and now you are engaging in character and personal assassination to cause mischief. I categorically declare that I am NOT a Hindu, or an Indian, but a Mohajir from Karachi with a diverse ancestry consisting of Rajput, Iranian, and Turkish grandparents.

Here is proof that Karnal is NOT in UP:


``Karnal is one of Historical Districts of Haryana. It is also known as a city of `Daanveer Karn`. It is known all over the world for production of Rice, Wheat and Milk. It is also known for agriculture research Institutions like NDRI, CSSRI, Wheat Research Directorate, National Bureau of Animal Genetics Resources, Sugarcane Breeding Institute etc.

LOCATION
Karnal is important city on Delhi Ambala Rail Line & Sher Shah Suri Marg (G.T.Road), connected with all important places in the country. It is 123 Kilometer from Delhi & 130 Kilometer from Chandigarh.

Karnal District lies on the western Bank of river Yamuna which once flows about 11 Kilometer. to the east forming eastern boundary of the district. The river Yamuna separates Haryana from Utter Pardesh. The Karnal Distt. including Panipat lies between 29`09`50`` and 29`50` North latitude and 76 31` 15`` and 77 12`45`` East longitude, its height from sea level is between 235 and 252 meters. The Karnal Distt. is surrounded by Kurukshetra District on its north-west, jind & Kaithal Distt. on its west, Panipat Distt. on its south and Utter Pradesh on east.``

Karnal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses of Karnal see Karnal (disambiguation).
Karnal, Haryana, India
Karnal
Coordinates: 29.42° N 77.02° E
Time zone IST (UTC+5:30)
District(s) Karnal
Coordinates: 29.42° N 77.02° E
Karnal pronunciation (help·info) (Hindi: करनाल) is the headquarters of Karnal District, Haryana, India. Karnal is said to have been founded by the Kauravas at around the time of the Mahabharata epic for the king Karna, a key figure in the epic tale. It is 123 km from Delhi on the National Highway NH-1 (also called the GT Road) and 126 km from Chandigarh. Karnal is known for the manufacture of shoes, the production of basmati rice and for its many agricultural research institutions.
...
Geography
Karnal is known for its lush greenery. It is roughly equidistant from New Delhi and Chandigarh and lies not only on the NH-1 road but also on the Delhi to Ambala railway line. The city is divided into several sectors, colonies and mohallas. Due to its geographical location several group housing companies like Sahara, Narsi Village, Palm Residency and Ansal Royale have built new luxury apartments and villas in the city.

The views expressed by Salim Chauhan in this article represent a sociopath mindset that justifies its self-imposed isolation by resorting to perverted facts and historical revisionism.

The author asserted that Mohajirs face bloodshed, massacre and oppression at the hands of Punjabis. Yet he failed to provide historical or contemporary evidence of these massacres ever been taken place.

The author also failed to recognize that Mohajirs dominated the country`s bureaucracy during its first decade and therefore must share responsibility for any deeds (or misdeeds) committed during the formative years (1947-71).

Instead of recognizing facts, the author pursued his agenda of distancing Mohajirs from this era. Even silly statements were made. For example, the author informed us that Liaqat Ali Khan was Punjabi. (He was actually born at Karnal in UP).

The author also asserted that since most of the major players in 1971 crisis were non-Mohajirs, therefore Mohajirs must have been ``uninvolved`` in this episode. But what about the thousands of Mohajir bureaucrats who administered East Pakistan and several federal ministries? Could the military government headed by Yahya Khan function without the support of these civil servants? And what was the agenda behind singling out Punjabis when at least two of the major players (A.A.K.Niazi and Z.A.Bhutto) were non-Punjabis? Is it perhaps because the author is extremely prejudiced against Punjabis? Or is it because he is an Indian Hindu with limited knowledge posing as a Mohajir?

There were ofcourse Mohajir players in this crisis. General Rahimuddin, born at Kaimganj in UP, presided over the special court that tried Mujib for sedition in Faisalabad. The honorable general delivered a death sentence to Mujib, which was never carried out by Bhutto. So much for Mohajir neutrality :)

Historical revisionism was in full gear when the author asserted that Urdu tehzeeb was superior to Punjabi tehzeeb. Punjabi literature actually emerged 3 centuries before Urdu literature and ventured into social commentary much before Ghalib, Mir and Akbar Allahabadi`s era.

The funniest part of the author`s commentary was that he did not mention the post-1971 era!!! All his arguments and assertions related to the East Pakistan crisis and role of razakars.

The author skirted a discussion of APMSO, Sohrab Goth riots, Operation Cleanup, 1990 elections, the MQM split, Afaq Ahmed, MQM boycott of 1993 elections, bhatta policy of MQM, extra judicial killings, Altaf`s statements against Jinnah, the role of Mohajir general Usmani in Kargil and MQM`s election reversals in 2002.

Who expects a discussion of Mohajir issues to revolve only around 1947 and 1971 ???Perhaps an Indian Hindu. Because these are the only dates that stick in his mind. The first date represents an emotional trauma. The second represents the only military victory that a Hindu army has achieved during the last 4 centuries.

The limited nature of his arguments reinforces doubts about Salim`s identity. He is perhaps an Indian Hindu masquerading as a Mohajir, or a Mohajir who migrated from Pakistan back in the 70s :))

Chowk Staff:

Please read interact # 705 by zeemax. He says `` you shit `` .
Kindly remove him from this website as soon as possible to guarantee the integrity of this
website.

Respectfully submitted

number

#713 Number

(add-on)

However, if you read #706 again, no response has been sought from you. :)

Thank you and enjoy your walk down the garden path! :)

#713 Number

BJ Kumar

Re: # 706

Dear Mr. bjkumar:

I will respond to your interact after you tell me who you are. It is only fair since you know who
I am. If you do not want the world to know who you are, you may e-mail me:
asadulla@vsnl.com

Respectfully submitted

Syed Asadulla, Ph.D

Re: # 705

I will respond to your interact after you tell me who you are. It is only fair since you know
who I am. If you do not want to tell the world who you are, you can tell me via e-mail:
asadulla@vsnl.com

Re: # 689

Salim Bhai

You raised the question:

``What do you mean be Matarrua-gardi?``

First I would explain what I mean by `Matarrua`.

By it I mean the UP walaa Muslim migrants who invaded the newly established state of Pakistan in the garb of `Mahajareen`, like the Western hordes had invaded newly found America, to grab the properties left by the non-Muslim Pakis who were obliged to migrate to India mainly due to the hatred created against them by the very Matarruas.

As regards the feudals and vaderas of Punjab and Sindh, the fuming of Altaf, I am afraid, is very sinister with the ulterior motive of dividing the Punjabis and Sindhies. How can he be considered sincere in this respect when he is allied with the Wadera-in-Chief who is also a semi-matarrua and is relying on the same feudals and vaderas to perpetuate his rule and dominance of matarruas or what I called `mataura gardi`?

#704

Dear Dr. Asadulla,

(Kindly forgive my lack of competence in Urdu)

Iss anjuman mein aap-ko
Aana hai baar-baar
Deewarey-dar ko gaur se
Pehchan lijiye...!

#704 by number,

I know who you are. You`re a mehdiite for someone you call mehdi buried near Kabul or thereabouts ... you shit ..

Re: # 703

Dear Mr. Chauhan:

Thanks for telling me what ISLAMIST is. I am a muslim and not an ISLAMIST.

Regards,

Syed Asadulla, Ph.D

#702, Dear Dr. Asadulla Sahib,
I think that more and more people are associating the word ``ISLAMIST`` with those who want to redefine everything in terms of their perception of ``ISLAM.`` Especially, it refers to people who want ``ISLAM,`` as defined by them, to govern everything including government, laws, economics, entertainment, dress, customs, marriage, behavior, education, and even sports. These people tend to be very vocal and consider force, including violence, as legitimate means to attain their goals. I consider it to be a negative word, because it uses a positive term such as ISLAM to mutilate it into a justification for evil. :(

Re: # 676

Dear Mr. Chauhan:

I am not sure if this interact will be published since you have concluded this forum.
Please ignore my ignorance and tell me what is an ISLAMIST.

I hope and pray that soon our three countries will be reunified and we will live a decent human
life (Aameen)

Syed Asadulla, Ph.D

Salim Mian


For your big SUCCESS on front page.

Will look forward for another article by you on front page.

Take care

As we conclude this forum, I want to thank ALL the participants for their excellent feedback, interesting viewpoints, and useful suggestions. Also, I enjoyed hosting this dialogue and want to express my gratitude and surprise at the mostly polite, civil, and thoughtful exchange. Khuda Hafiz, Namastay, and Till we Meet Again. :)

Here is what I find so amazing. Many Pakistani Punjabis want to stress that Mohajirs have never had it so good. Mohajirs dominate Pakistan. Urdu has been ``forced`` upon the rest of the country. Mohajirs should stop complaining, and in fact, return most of what they have ``unfairly`` amassed in Pakistan - including their underserved education and literacy. :)

Mohajirs, OTOH, complain about the unfair quotas that pit rural Sindh against urban Sindh. They stress that no such urban/rural divide exists in Punjab, NWFP, and Baluchistan. Mohajirs make a big deal out of the fact that the Pakistani Army Rangers, mostly Punjabis, were cruel, bloody, insensitive, and very biased in the way they occupied Karachi and Hyderabad. The Punjabis punished the local Pakistanis, mostly Mohajirs, with collective punishments and cruelty reminiscent of the acts of another generation of Punjabi soldiers in East Pakistan.

Maybe the truth lies in the fact that partition was the evil that split up a cohesive Punjab and brought together two distinctly separate people who had no business coming together. :(