Salim Chauhan April 11, 2007
#129 Posted by Sanatani on April 12, 2007 2:33:40 am
PanChoood
Jad lakh hurrami pharwe marre si te ek muhajira kanjara paida hoya si.
Random Thoughts
Gurdwara Shahidganj ke riots kahan hue the? Kanpur mein, Mumbai mein or Kalkatte mein. Punjab mein tension hui parantu chut put ghatna ke pashchat kuch nahin.
Muhajirs were 14.5% of UP`s populaion but controlled 65% of posts down from about 85% at the time of the mughals this really pinched them.
Aligarh MU was the cradle of Pakistan and the andhergardi of Islam khatre mein that was used to unite the muslims of Punjab against their Hindu and Sikh bretheren was entirely a product of Pakistan movement volunteeers of the Ashraf Castes of UP helped by the azlaf sword arm (qureshis and ansaris) e.g. to maintain order in their meetings.
Men like kidwai, azad and zak counted for nothing in India ever. Pre partition the Muslims did not trust them post partition the Hindus. But Post partition as they were on a congress ticket and thus won on a party loyalty basis.
Sick and terroristic ideologies like deobandiayat and TJ are the product of UP.
In Bengal the entire Ulema that ignited the Anti Hindu pogrom was from UP Barelvis this time. The Pak establishment which was Muhajir and then Punjabi and then Pathan had a very nice agenda every time Bong aspirations were raised they would used Islam khatre mein an attck the hapless bangali Hindus with the Muhajirs leading the way and the Bengalis following.
In punjab the sparks were ignited by the Bhaiya Muslims and the Punjabis paid the price.
In Sindh these harammkhors attacked the Sindhi Hindus again with the help of their Sindhi Muslim auxillaries who were 2 happy to get back at the Hindus for the real progressives were Hindus not Muslims to establish Islamic Raaj. Remember GM Syyed famous staement in the Sind Assembly that the Hindus in Sindh would meet a fate worse than the jews in Germany came after a leading light from Aligarh became his PA.
Yes Liaqat Ali Khan was a Muhajir his major landholdings were in West UP.
Nawab of Chattari the man who organised the Razakars in Hyderabad was from UP.
We could continue this.
These Muhajirs are scum of the highest order. UP mein Danga yeh shuru kart hain 8-10 Hindu marte hein jab 100-125 jawaab mein kate hain to chillate hain hai secularism in Danger.
The different response of Muslims to Shahidganj and Babri Masjid is a case in Point. in 1938 you would hyave expected a more fanatical response than 1989.
Sum total these Maadarchooods are Basturrds of the highest order. Yeh Bharat mata ke bhi gaddar hain or Pakistan ke bhi.
I would not mind the valley going (temproarily) to Pak so that is desh mein kuch lakh kamzaat allah ko pyare ho jaiyein.
Heres wishing a speedy return to Nawaz and BB so that inko phir tameez sikhayi jaye.
Salim Katue continue your wet dreams however hopefully we will send some of your cousins to Pakistan and a large majority to Kabristan and those we send across the border will finally be given peace by the rangers the peace of the graveyard.
Zee bhai there cannot be a return to Punjabi Bhaichara even if we forgive 1947 we cannot forgive 1971 what you did to our Bengali Hindu brothers and sisters cannot just be forgiven, but since you (Punjabi Musslamans) are a majority you lead the way in teaching traitors a lesson we will follow and this time not let you down.
Regards
Sanatani
Jad lakh hurrami pharwe marre si te ek muhajira kanjara paida hoya si.
Random Thoughts
Gurdwara Shahidganj ke riots kahan hue the? Kanpur mein, Mumbai mein or Kalkatte mein. Punjab mein tension hui parantu chut put ghatna ke pashchat kuch nahin.
Muhajirs were 14.5% of UP`s populaion but controlled 65% of posts down from about 85% at the time of the mughals this really pinched them.
Aligarh MU was the cradle of Pakistan and the andhergardi of Islam khatre mein that was used to unite the muslims of Punjab against their Hindu and Sikh bretheren was entirely a product of Pakistan movement volunteeers of the Ashraf Castes of UP helped by the azlaf sword arm (qureshis and ansaris) e.g. to maintain order in their meetings.
Men like kidwai, azad and zak counted for nothing in India ever. Pre partition the Muslims did not trust them post partition the Hindus. But Post partition as they were on a congress ticket and thus won on a party loyalty basis.
Sick and terroristic ideologies like deobandiayat and TJ are the product of UP.
In Bengal the entire Ulema that ignited the Anti Hindu pogrom was from UP Barelvis this time. The Pak establishment which was Muhajir and then Punjabi and then Pathan had a very nice agenda every time Bong aspirations were raised they would used Islam khatre mein an attck the hapless bangali Hindus with the Muhajirs leading the way and the Bengalis following.
In punjab the sparks were ignited by the Bhaiya Muslims and the Punjabis paid the price.
In Sindh these harammkhors attacked the Sindhi Hindus again with the help of their Sindhi Muslim auxillaries who were 2 happy to get back at the Hindus for the real progressives were Hindus not Muslims to establish Islamic Raaj. Remember GM Syyed famous staement in the Sind Assembly that the Hindus in Sindh would meet a fate worse than the jews in Germany came after a leading light from Aligarh became his PA.
Yes Liaqat Ali Khan was a Muhajir his major landholdings were in West UP.
Nawab of Chattari the man who organised the Razakars in Hyderabad was from UP.
We could continue this.
These Muhajirs are scum of the highest order. UP mein Danga yeh shuru kart hain 8-10 Hindu marte hein jab 100-125 jawaab mein kate hain to chillate hain hai secularism in Danger.
The different response of Muslims to Shahidganj and Babri Masjid is a case in Point. in 1938 you would hyave expected a more fanatical response than 1989.
Sum total these Maadarchooods are Basturrds of the highest order. Yeh Bharat mata ke bhi gaddar hain or Pakistan ke bhi.
I would not mind the valley going (temproarily) to Pak so that is desh mein kuch lakh kamzaat allah ko pyare ho jaiyein.
Heres wishing a speedy return to Nawaz and BB so that inko phir tameez sikhayi jaye.
Salim Katue continue your wet dreams however hopefully we will send some of your cousins to Pakistan and a large majority to Kabristan and those we send across the border will finally be given peace by the rangers the peace of the graveyard.
Zee bhai there cannot be a return to Punjabi Bhaichara even if we forgive 1947 we cannot forgive 1971 what you did to our Bengali Hindu brothers and sisters cannot just be forgiven, but since you (Punjabi Musslamans) are a majority you lead the way in teaching traitors a lesson we will follow and this time not let you down.
Regards
Sanatani
#130 Posted by Sanatani on April 12, 2007 2:53:55 am
Re: # 88
Yeh sale chor.
Of course, Punjabis, Sindhis, Baluch, Pathans, Kashmiris, Ahmedis, Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jews, and any other people who want to live in peace with Mohajirs in Karachi and Hyderabad have every right to enjoy what our society can easily become - a secular, free, independent, fair, and egalitarian oasis for commerce, progress, peace, and education. We Mohajirs (along with Sindhis, Baluchis, Pathans, Kashmiris, and of course the Bengalis) are the ones who have suffered from the hegemony and exclusivity of the Punjabis.
Substitute for Punjabis Upper Castes and for Sindhis SC`s, for Pathans ST`s, for Baluchis OBC`s, for Kashmiris MBC`s and for Bengalis Women and for Mohajirs Muslims this could be a cousin of Salim Chouhan speaking in an election rally in UP.
The fact of the matter is these mfkrs do not give respect to any other community but want it in return. People tend to think that the others are like them in their bad habbits and totally not like them in their good habbits. So these types see Punjabis in Pak and Upper Caste Hindus in India as the enemy since they percieve that if it were not for them wee would dominate.
So they try and put this agenda we are all opressed and the oppressors are Punjabis/ Hindus and if we unite we can overthrow them.
This begs one question in SIndh those kidnapping the Hindu girls and forcibly converting them are mostly Muhajir and with a sprinkling of Sindhis pray tell me are they doing this under the influence of Punjabis.
And no this is not the Punjabi in me speaking but the Hindu.
Slaughter all UP Muslims
Sanatani
Yeh sale chor.
Of course, Punjabis, Sindhis, Baluch, Pathans, Kashmiris, Ahmedis, Shias, Sunnis, Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jews, and any other people who want to live in peace with Mohajirs in Karachi and Hyderabad have every right to enjoy what our society can easily become - a secular, free, independent, fair, and egalitarian oasis for commerce, progress, peace, and education. We Mohajirs (along with Sindhis, Baluchis, Pathans, Kashmiris, and of course the Bengalis) are the ones who have suffered from the hegemony and exclusivity of the Punjabis.
Substitute for Punjabis Upper Castes and for Sindhis SC`s, for Pathans ST`s, for Baluchis OBC`s, for Kashmiris MBC`s and for Bengalis Women and for Mohajirs Muslims this could be a cousin of Salim Chouhan speaking in an election rally in UP.
The fact of the matter is these mfkrs do not give respect to any other community but want it in return. People tend to think that the others are like them in their bad habbits and totally not like them in their good habbits. So these types see Punjabis in Pak and Upper Caste Hindus in India as the enemy since they percieve that if it were not for them wee would dominate.
So they try and put this agenda we are all opressed and the oppressors are Punjabis/ Hindus and if we unite we can overthrow them.
This begs one question in SIndh those kidnapping the Hindu girls and forcibly converting them are mostly Muhajir and with a sprinkling of Sindhis pray tell me are they doing this under the influence of Punjabis.
And no this is not the Punjabi in me speaking but the Hindu.
Slaughter all UP Muslims
Sanatani
#131 Posted by zeemax on April 12, 2007 2:54:37 am
#57 by Salim_Chauhan,
MQM is even successful in elections in Kashmir - go figure that.
Bhai ... MQM will also be successful in Timbaktu if Musharraf makes sure it does :)
#61 by Salim_Chauhan
Urstruly, Zeemax, HP, Ally, etc... All the ``Pisser-e-Zameen`` coming together in a
circle. :)
Why is it that a Pakistani born in Pakistan whose parents migrated from Amritsar a ``Pisser-e-Zameen``, while a Pakistani born in Pakistan whose parents migrated from UP is not?
:~)
MQM is even successful in elections in Kashmir - go figure that.
Bhai ... MQM will also be successful in Timbaktu if Musharraf makes sure it does :)
#61 by Salim_Chauhan
Urstruly, Zeemax, HP, Ally, etc... All the ``Pisser-e-Zameen`` coming together in a
circle. :)
Why is it that a Pakistani born in Pakistan whose parents migrated from Amritsar a ``Pisser-e-Zameen``, while a Pakistani born in Pakistan whose parents migrated from UP is not?
:~)
#132 Posted by zeemax on April 12, 2007 2:56:12 am
#110 by behram1,
Welcome back. I see we`ll have to wait a while before your posts are cleared by the `Pre-Audit` department of Chowk :)
Welcome back. I see we`ll have to wait a while before your posts are cleared by the `Pre-Audit` department of Chowk :)
#133 Posted by Sanatani on April 12, 2007 3:05:57 am
Re: # 91
Aquarius I have never understood this Ganga Jamuna Tehjeeb. Most of My family settled in UP after partition and I could not understand who followed this tehzeeb.
After a lot of Research I think I got this answer (I may be wrong) the Kayasths of Wajid ALi Shah`s court and a few Muslim Loving and later Anglophile UP Khatris and Kashmiri Brahmans like Moti Lal Nehru.
Rest of UP no one has ever heard of this. This was a term coined under Mrs Gandhi to sell the flawed and pseudo UP muslim appeasing Pseudo Secularism.
Regards
Sanatani
About the Kayasths also it is interesting why the followed it. See the Kayasths were the most secure of Hindus you will never find a Kayasth Muslim. Basically they were so powerful in the sense that they controlled the lower and middle bureaucracy that even Auranzeb yes Aurangzeb did not dare take them on. It was this sense of security that led them to do what they pleased including aping the courtly manners of the Mughals and Nawabs though knowing the Kayasths as I do i think these fkrs were just mocking the ruling class of that time.
Note to kayasths the term fkrs is used affectionately
Aquarius I have never understood this Ganga Jamuna Tehjeeb. Most of My family settled in UP after partition and I could not understand who followed this tehzeeb.
After a lot of Research I think I got this answer (I may be wrong) the Kayasths of Wajid ALi Shah`s court and a few Muslim Loving and later Anglophile UP Khatris and Kashmiri Brahmans like Moti Lal Nehru.
Rest of UP no one has ever heard of this. This was a term coined under Mrs Gandhi to sell the flawed and pseudo UP muslim appeasing Pseudo Secularism.
Regards
Sanatani
About the Kayasths also it is interesting why the followed it. See the Kayasths were the most secure of Hindus you will never find a Kayasth Muslim. Basically they were so powerful in the sense that they controlled the lower and middle bureaucracy that even Auranzeb yes Aurangzeb did not dare take them on. It was this sense of security that led them to do what they pleased including aping the courtly manners of the Mughals and Nawabs though knowing the Kayasths as I do i think these fkrs were just mocking the ruling class of that time.
Note to kayasths the term fkrs is used affectionately
#134 Posted by zeemax on April 12, 2007 3:11:00 am
#129 by sanatani
PanChoood Jad lakh hurrami pharwe marre si te ek muhajira kanjara paida hoya si.
Hahaha .... Dheeraj Maharaj ... :)
PanChoood Jad lakh hurrami pharwe marre si te ek muhajira kanjara paida hoya si.
Hahaha .... Dheeraj Maharaj ... :)
#135 Posted by Dash_Dot on April 12, 2007 3:22:13 am
a decent article salim. I see from the number of interacts (and interactors) you have had your fill of comments. This paragraph from your article cannot be left unquoted or uncommented upon
The suffering of our parents’ generation under the successive brutality of Bhutto, Zia, Benazir, Nawaz Sharif , Benazir II, Nawaz Sharif II, the PPP, the ML, and the fratricidal factions of MQM are all part of Pakistan’s more recent and agonizing history. Military rule has been substantially better for Mohajirs than the so-called periods of “democracy,” when we have suffered from quotas, rigged elections, police and paramilitary violence, censorship, looting, destruction, and even mass killings.
There you have it - very succinctly put - why Military rule always has the support of the Muhajirs The odd ball was Zai-ul-haq a bloody Stephensonian and muhajir ala Musharuff but nevertheless cut the muhajirs down.....
The suffering of our parents’ generation under the successive brutality of Bhutto, Zia, Benazir, Nawaz Sharif , Benazir II, Nawaz Sharif II, the PPP, the ML, and the fratricidal factions of MQM are all part of Pakistan’s more recent and agonizing history. Military rule has been substantially better for Mohajirs than the so-called periods of “democracy,” when we have suffered from quotas, rigged elections, police and paramilitary violence, censorship, looting, destruction, and even mass killings.
There you have it - very succinctly put - why Military rule always has the support of the Muhajirs The odd ball was Zai-ul-haq a bloody Stephensonian and muhajir ala Musharuff but nevertheless cut the muhajirs down.....
#136 Posted by aquaris on April 12, 2007 3:53:29 am
Re: # 130
Yes this self preceived, tunnel vision, narrow mindedness about the superiority of this Ganga Jamna Tehzeeb is the root cause of their STILL alienation from the rest of the country.
Beside, 70% of them being Herd together in Just Two cities.
They have made invisible, cocoon like structure around them, both physically and psycologically.
this was a Startling revelation during the 6-8 months long , so called Sindhi-Urdu ,non-offical dialogue , that took place bewteen them and sindhis in the 80`s.
... and I bet, noone living in Karachi, especially the urdu speaking have any idea of life , outside Karachi, except the stero types , mostly negative , portraied by their so called
writers, and opinion makers.
... this false sense of superiority of their `` TEHZEEB `` was amply prooved, when Liaqat Ali Khan , threw out Sindh University from Karachi, and when Khooro Objected,. he contemptfully and arrogantly said. ``...... we do not need to learn any thing about the
Gahda Gari Walas........``
Yes this self preceived, tunnel vision, narrow mindedness about the superiority of this Ganga Jamna Tehzeeb is the root cause of their STILL alienation from the rest of the country.
Beside, 70% of them being Herd together in Just Two cities.
They have made invisible, cocoon like structure around them, both physically and psycologically.
this was a Startling revelation during the 6-8 months long , so called Sindhi-Urdu ,non-offical dialogue , that took place bewteen them and sindhis in the 80`s.
... and I bet, noone living in Karachi, especially the urdu speaking have any idea of life , outside Karachi, except the stero types , mostly negative , portraied by their so called
writers, and opinion makers.
... this false sense of superiority of their `` TEHZEEB `` was amply prooved, when Liaqat Ali Khan , threw out Sindh University from Karachi, and when Khooro Objected,. he contemptfully and arrogantly said. ``...... we do not need to learn any thing about the
Gahda Gari Walas........``
#137 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 12, 2007 4:31:16 am
#100 by khamakhwa on April 11, 2007 5:26pm PT
{``mohajirs remind me of the little boy who gets angry when not included in the team and threatens to take the ball with him if not allowed to play...funny thing is it`s not even his ball...;) ``}
Khamakhwa,
This is not be a good time to give examples of little boys taking their balls with them without playing on a winning team - considering the performance of the Punjabi-dominated Pakistani cricket team. :)
If Bengalis and other ethnic groups were given a fair chance to participate, Pakistan could have become a world-class cricket powerhouse. :(
{``mohajirs remind me of the little boy who gets angry when not included in the team and threatens to take the ball with him if not allowed to play...funny thing is it`s not even his ball...;) ``}
Khamakhwa,
This is not be a good time to give examples of little boys taking their balls with them without playing on a winning team - considering the performance of the Punjabi-dominated Pakistani cricket team. :)
If Bengalis and other ethnic groups were given a fair chance to participate, Pakistan could have become a world-class cricket powerhouse. :(
#138 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 12, 2007 4:38:11 am
#136 aquaris {``... this false sense of superiority of their `` TEHZEEB `` was amply prooved, when Liaqat Ali Khan , threw out Sindh University from Karachi, and when Khooro Objected,. he contemptfully and arrogantly said. ``...... we do not need to learn any thing about the Gahda Gari Walas........`` ``}
Aquaris,
Please make up your collective minds about Shaheed-e-Millat Liaquat Ali Khan from Karnal. When there are good things to say about him, he becomes a Punjabi. When you folks quote him in a derogatory manner, he becomes an Urdu-speaking Mohajir. :)
Wasn`t there an attempt to designate Jinnah Sahib an ethnic Punjabi? Perhaps some Paindoos got their Gujarats all confused. :)
Aquaris,
Please make up your collective minds about Shaheed-e-Millat Liaquat Ali Khan from Karnal. When there are good things to say about him, he becomes a Punjabi. When you folks quote him in a derogatory manner, he becomes an Urdu-speaking Mohajir. :)
Wasn`t there an attempt to designate Jinnah Sahib an ethnic Punjabi? Perhaps some Paindoos got their Gujarats all confused. :)
#139 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 12, 2007 4:45:36 am
#135 Dotty {``There you have it - very succinctly put - why Military rule always has the support of the Muhajirs The odd ball was Zai-ul-haq a bloody Stephensonian and muhajir ala Musharuff but nevertheless cut the muhajirs down.....``}
Dotty,
Thanks for the encouragement. I think the explanation is that the military doesn`t have to cater to popular opinion, especially in Punjab. Instead they do what is best for their own interests - impose power, some amount of law and order, get rich, and perpetuate their rule while making the so-called ``democrats`` look like corrupt, inefficient, and absolute fools. Mohajirs don`t support the military as much as the military lets them do what they are good at - education, private enterprise, making money, organizing relief and charity efforts. There is no real logic in killing the golden goose. Zia was just too much of a paindoo to realize his own mistake. While he and his family may have moved from Jullunder, he can be called a mohajir, but not a Mohajir. George Bush is a democrat but not a Democrat. :)
Dotty,
Thanks for the encouragement. I think the explanation is that the military doesn`t have to cater to popular opinion, especially in Punjab. Instead they do what is best for their own interests - impose power, some amount of law and order, get rich, and perpetuate their rule while making the so-called ``democrats`` look like corrupt, inefficient, and absolute fools. Mohajirs don`t support the military as much as the military lets them do what they are good at - education, private enterprise, making money, organizing relief and charity efforts. There is no real logic in killing the golden goose. Zia was just too much of a paindoo to realize his own mistake. While he and his family may have moved from Jullunder, he can be called a mohajir, but not a Mohajir. George Bush is a democrat but not a Democrat. :)
#140 Posted by aquaris on April 12, 2007 4:56:37 am
Re: # 138
As long as the Paki Panjoos were in colusion with them, every thing was OK.
..... the enforcement of Urdu, the LOOT mar or evacue property in Sindh, the patronizing of their Culture...etc..etc..etc....and......etc.
As soon as things started changing....... these Paki Panjoos were dumped, and with a consistent and relentless propaganda , became the AXIS of All EVILS.
As long as the Paki Panjoos were in colusion with them, every thing was OK.
..... the enforcement of Urdu, the LOOT mar or evacue property in Sindh, the patronizing of their Culture...etc..etc..etc....and......etc.
As soon as things started changing....... these Paki Panjoos were dumped, and with a consistent and relentless propaganda , became the AXIS of All EVILS.
#141 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 12, 2007 4:56:51 am
#131 Zeemax {``Why is it that a Pakistani born in Pakistan whose parents migrated from Amritsar a ``Pisser-e-Zameen``, while a Pakistani born in Pakistan whose parents migrated from UP is not?``}
Zee Bhai,
Very good question! Why don`t you ask this of the Punjabi elites who came up with the idea of ``agreed`` Vs ``non-agreed`` areas at the time of partition? If Mohajirs and their descendants had felt welcome by the ruling Punjabi elite, they would have loved to call their children ``Pisser-e-Zameen,`` - after all they were born in Pakistan. Unlike the US and other decent countries, Pakistan never acknowledged the 2nd, 3rd, or even 4th generation of Mohajirs as ``Sons of the Soil.`` They were always called ``HindustaaNRaN`` by the Punjabis and ``Panah Guzeer`` by the Pathans. Not that there weren`t significant numbers of Pathans among the Mohajirs - Rohillas, Bhopalis, Malihabadi, Shahjahanpuri, Badayuni, and others.
The quota system, imposed by the ruling elites discriminated against Mohajirs, whether they were born in India or in Pakistan. Application forms were notorious for questioning their place of birth, their father`s place of birth, and even their grandfather`s place of birth.
It might surprise you, but the ``stranded`` so-called ``Biharis`` in Bangladesh are overwhelmingly ``Pisser-e-Zameen`` or Pakistani by birth - according to your own definition.
Zee Bhai,
Very good question! Why don`t you ask this of the Punjabi elites who came up with the idea of ``agreed`` Vs ``non-agreed`` areas at the time of partition? If Mohajirs and their descendants had felt welcome by the ruling Punjabi elite, they would have loved to call their children ``Pisser-e-Zameen,`` - after all they were born in Pakistan. Unlike the US and other decent countries, Pakistan never acknowledged the 2nd, 3rd, or even 4th generation of Mohajirs as ``Sons of the Soil.`` They were always called ``HindustaaNRaN`` by the Punjabis and ``Panah Guzeer`` by the Pathans. Not that there weren`t significant numbers of Pathans among the Mohajirs - Rohillas, Bhopalis, Malihabadi, Shahjahanpuri, Badayuni, and others.
The quota system, imposed by the ruling elites discriminated against Mohajirs, whether they were born in India or in Pakistan. Application forms were notorious for questioning their place of birth, their father`s place of birth, and even their grandfather`s place of birth.
It might surprise you, but the ``stranded`` so-called ``Biharis`` in Bangladesh are overwhelmingly ``Pisser-e-Zameen`` or Pakistani by birth - according to your own definition.
#142 Posted by zeemax on April 12, 2007 5:03:11 am
Salim, HP,
As narrated by Saharifuddin Peerzada (and published in a column in Daily Jang a while ago) Ms. Fatima Jinnah was a highly rude and arrogant woman, who was murdered by her servants precisely for this reason. He says he personally was witness to her body when found and it had strangle marks on the throat. He also said that once when her car was passing through a crowd and a small child while grabbing at the handle accidentally opened the door, she slapped him and asked the driver to beat the kid up.
Is that true?
As narrated by Saharifuddin Peerzada (and published in a column in Daily Jang a while ago) Ms. Fatima Jinnah was a highly rude and arrogant woman, who was murdered by her servants precisely for this reason. He says he personally was witness to her body when found and it had strangle marks on the throat. He also said that once when her car was passing through a crowd and a small child while grabbing at the handle accidentally opened the door, she slapped him and asked the driver to beat the kid up.
Is that true?
#143 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on April 12, 2007 5:06:04 am
#130 Sanatani {``This begs one question in SIndh those kidnapping the Hindu girls and forcibly converting them are mostly Muhajir and with a sprinkling of Sindhis pray tell me are they doing this under the influence of Punjabis.
And no this is not the Punjabi in me speaking but the Hindu.
Slaughter all UP Muslims ``}
Sanatani,
Most of your nonsense in your post is so bizarre that it doesn`t merit a response. But one outstanding lie is your assertion that the kidnappers of Hindu girls are mostly Mohajir. Sir, this is absolutely false and you need to apologize for being such a malicious liar.
As for killing all UP Muslims, you right-wing Hindutva BJP/RSS/VHP/BD/SP/SS/JS supporters seem to concentrate your efforts in Gujarat, Maharashtra, and southern MP. I don`t think you have the will, the balls, or the support among good Hindus in UP. Muslims and Hindus in UP, unlike in Punjab, have usually been cordial in their relationships - regardless of what you imported types do. :) I think now you understand the meaning of TEHZEEB.
And no this is not the Punjabi in me speaking but the Hindu.
Slaughter all UP Muslims ``}
Sanatani,
Most of your nonsense in your post is so bizarre that it doesn`t merit a response. But one outstanding lie is your assertion that the kidnappers of Hindu girls are mostly Mohajir. Sir, this is absolutely false and you need to apologize for being such a malicious liar.
As for killing all UP Muslims, you right-wing Hindutva BJP/RSS/VHP/BD/SP/SS/JS supporters seem to concentrate your efforts in Gujarat, Maharashtra, and southern MP. I don`t think you have the will, the balls, or the support among good Hindus in UP. Muslims and Hindus in UP, unlike in Punjab, have usually been cordial in their relationships - regardless of what you imported types do. :) I think now you understand the meaning of TEHZEEB.
#144 Posted by zeemax on April 12, 2007 5:11:17 am
#141 by Salim_Chauhan,
They were always called ``HindustaaNRaN`` by the Punjabis and ``Panah Guzeer`` by the Pathans.
Hmmm .. this indeed has a ring of truth. As a Lucknuvi Lady friend of mine (not the injection one .. ) had remarked ``Hindustani hamein Pakistani kehtey hain; Pakistani hamein Hindustani kehtey hain .. aap hi bataeeyay ham kahan jayen?
They were always called ``HindustaaNRaN`` by the Punjabis and ``Panah Guzeer`` by the Pathans.
Hmmm .. this indeed has a ring of truth. As a Lucknuvi Lady friend of mine (not the injection one .. ) had remarked ``Hindustani hamein Pakistani kehtey hain; Pakistani hamein Hindustani kehtey hain .. aap hi bataeeyay ham kahan jayen?
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- tahmed32: #680 Goldfinger: i am... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- Kulharee: Masadi Yaar, you are... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- Goldfinger: Re: # 677 tahmed,... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- masadi: tahmed writes "if the... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- masadi: The US wants to... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- Goldfinger: Re: # 673 masadi... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- majumdar: Masadi sahib, Are you implying... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- tahmed32: Goldfinger: the question that... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content