Tariq Ali May 25, 2007
#468 Posted by RAJAHINDUSTANI on June 22, 2007 9:56:33 am
kya mast desh hai... sab loot rahe hai. Ghar ke bhedi , lanka dhai.
#466 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 3:30:27 am
#464 by hassauriwala,
Didn`t you recognise your sister in that photo? I guess not because you are a muttarwa kaala dhobi while the girl is white. So must be by the pathan milkman when your father was away on altaphi duty ...
Didn`t you recognise your sister in that photo? I guess not because you are a muttarwa kaala dhobi while the girl is white. So must be by the pathan milkman when your father was away on altaphi duty ...
#467 Posted by hassauriwala on June 4, 2007 10:57:26 am
Re: # 466
I am not done with you zeemax. I am not in that photo because as you say I am a mutarwa. That fair-skinned guy is you or your dad or someone in your family posing with of course his sister which kind of explains your state of mental retardation.
I am not done with you zeemax. I am not in that photo because as you say I am a mutarwa. That fair-skinned guy is you or your dad or someone in your family posing with of course his sister which kind of explains your state of mental retardation.
#465 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 3:27:53 am
#463 by hassauriwala,
Abey jaahil .... Jinnah had no grandchildren other than Dina`s kids. He married Emibai when she was 16 against his wish at his mom`s insistence and left for London immediately afterwards, and six months later Emibai died. He had NO kids from Emibai. Whatever grandson claimants are, these are the neighbours. Only way it can be true is Emibai had her way with neighbours when Jinnah was away and produced some kid in six months instead of nine.
AH, neither your altaphi muttarwa Salim nor you can demolish the facts.
Abey jaahil .... Jinnah had no grandchildren other than Dina`s kids. He married Emibai when she was 16 against his wish at his mom`s insistence and left for London immediately afterwards, and six months later Emibai died. He had NO kids from Emibai. Whatever grandson claimants are, these are the neighbours. Only way it can be true is Emibai had her way with neighbours when Jinnah was away and produced some kid in six months instead of nine.
AH, neither your altaphi muttarwa Salim nor you can demolish the facts.
#463 Posted by hassauriwala on June 3, 2007 1:43:11 am
>>Read it again with different punctuation hathoriwala ... :)
``I don`t believe the claim of any Jinnah`s grandsons - many people of Kharadar claim that ... even neighbors. So, forget it.
That still does not make any sense retard, even with the added punctuation.
You still have not refuted my statement that Sikandar Ali who was killed in a police-encounter in 1994 in Kharadar was not Mr Jinnah`s grandson.
It may not affect your primitive and corrupt tribal mentality but you may as well know that he was an innocent man with no criminal or political involvement since as a third-class feudal you are so obsessed with disproving (or proving) family connections.
I am waiting for you to be banned after which I will take your statements apart piece by piece with my brother Saleem.
#462 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 12:36:57 am
...contd...#461
Oops ... sorry ... I thought you were talking about the monkey suckling pic.
That other pic was meant for naqshbandi in support of my argument that morality springs from religion and not society. Since you don`t have any inkling about that debate, better shut up.
Oops ... sorry ... I thought you were talking about the monkey suckling pic.
That other pic was meant for naqshbandi in support of my argument that morality springs from religion and not society. Since you don`t have any inkling about that debate, better shut up.
#464 Posted by hassauriwala on June 3, 2007 1:44:43 am
Re: # 462
Yes and that still does not justify why you posted a pic of yourself and your sister in #353. Are you obsessed with incest or what?
Yes and that still does not justify why you posted a pic of yourself and your sister in #353. Are you obsessed with incest or what?
#461 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 11:39:01 pm
#458 by hassauriwala,
Why have you posted your family photo in post number 353 ..
Didn`t you know hindoos are monkeys? Oh ... well. This is in fact Arjun`s baby pic ... ! But apparently rf786 is a hindoo as well so I thought he`ll be happy to see his next of kin :~)
Why have you posted your family photo in post number 353 ..
Didn`t you know hindoos are monkeys? Oh ... well. This is in fact Arjun`s baby pic ... ! But apparently rf786 is a hindoo as well so I thought he`ll be happy to see his next of kin :~)
#460 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 11:36:15 pm
#457 by hassauriwala,
Abey Mr. hathorhi waley, you say:
You tell me first what your idiot sentence meant ``I don`t believe the claim of any Jinnah`s grandsons. Many people of Kharadar claim that. Even neighbors, so forget it.``
Read it again with different punctuation hathoriwala ... :)
``I don`t believe the claim of any Jinnah`s grandsons - many people of Kharadar claim that ... even neighbors. So, forget it.``
.... I will then explain to you what I meant.
Go ahead. Now tell me keh yeh grandsons jinnah ki konsi beewi ki aulad sey nikley? Agar emibai kaha tau ek chapat tikaoon gaa .. :)
Regards :~)
Abey Mr. hathorhi waley, you say:
You tell me first what your idiot sentence meant ``I don`t believe the claim of any Jinnah`s grandsons. Many people of Kharadar claim that. Even neighbors, so forget it.``
Read it again with different punctuation hathoriwala ... :)
``I don`t believe the claim of any Jinnah`s grandsons - many people of Kharadar claim that ... even neighbors. So, forget it.``
.... I will then explain to you what I meant.
Go ahead. Now tell me keh yeh grandsons jinnah ki konsi beewi ki aulad sey nikley? Agar emibai kaha tau ek chapat tikaoon gaa .. :)
Regards :~)
#458 Posted by hassauriwala on June 1, 2007 1:16:28 pm
...and by the way zeemax. Why have you posted your family photo in post number 353 in the middle of a serious discussion on politics ?
You give people like arjun the opportunity to blame all Pakistanis .
You give people like arjun the opportunity to blame all Pakistanis .
#457 Posted by hassauriwala on June 1, 2007 12:58:15 pm
Well at least you know what I am talking about zeemax.
You tell me first what your idiot sentence meant
``I don`t believe the claim of any Jinnah`s grandsons. Many people of Kharadar claim that. Even neighbors, so forget it.``
I will then explain to you what I meant
You tell me first what your idiot sentence meant
``I don`t believe the claim of any Jinnah`s grandsons. Many people of Kharadar claim that. Even neighbors, so forget it.``
I will then explain to you what I meant
#456 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 4:49:59 am
#450 by hassauriwala,
Abey ... yeh jinnah ki konsi beewi ki aulad sey grandson nikley? Agar emibai kaha tau ek chapat tikaoon gaa .. :)
Abey ... yeh jinnah ki konsi beewi ki aulad sey grandson nikley? Agar emibai kaha tau ek chapat tikaoon gaa .. :)
#452 Posted by echoboom on May 31, 2007 3:00:59 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#451 Posted by echoboom on May 31, 2007 2:55:24 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#450 Posted by hassauriwala on May 31, 2007 2:47:58 pm
``I don`t believe the claim of any Jinnah`s grandsons. Many people of Kharadar claim that. Even neighbors, so forget it.``
Hello people. Can someone please help?
I have quoted above from Mr Zeemax who ( I am not really sure but ) was trying to deny that two of Mr Jinnah`s grandsons had been killed in a police-encounter in 1994.
Since he knew he was lying , Mr Zeemax wrote two broken sentences which do not make much sense.
The news is archived on the daily Dawn or Karachipage.com or somewhere . Can someone please pick it up from there and prove Zeemax to be the liar he is?
Hello people. Can someone please help?
I have quoted above from Mr Zeemax who ( I am not really sure but ) was trying to deny that two of Mr Jinnah`s grandsons had been killed in a police-encounter in 1994.
Since he knew he was lying , Mr Zeemax wrote two broken sentences which do not make much sense.
The news is archived on the daily Dawn or Karachipage.com or somewhere . Can someone please pick it up from there and prove Zeemax to be the liar he is?
#449 Posted by tahmed32 on May 31, 2007 11:45:28 am
salimchauhan: on the other issue of your dealings with atif, ali etc. on unplugged, you make a fair point in saying they refer to you in the same manner. as long as you restrict your jibes against ``panjoos`` to those who write about ``matarwas`` (and worse), then that is your business. However, please leave those of us who are not here to exchange mudslings out of it. If you think I am some kind of a smooth talking sinister panjoo, then that is fine too and if I have time, as you know, I can do a pretty good job of getting back to you. As they say, treat others as you would have them treat you.
What I meant was not the alis and atifs or stukas. They can get back to you and more. The ones I hope you will lay off from are people like this female poster on unplugged who is a perfectly decent poster whom you routinely try to ridicule on account of her being panjabi. Behave like a rat, and you get called one as well.
I am sorry if the above sounds unfriendly, but contrary to what you think, I dont do ``veiled`` meanings, nor do I have any reason to be hypocritical on anything since I am not running for chowk mayor.
I wish you and all others on chowk all the best, and sincerely mean everything I wrote below, but that does not mean that you have the right to take advantage of posters who due to age or gender or merely self-respect are not willing to get back to you in the same language that you use for them.
What I meant was not the alis and atifs or stukas. They can get back to you and more. The ones I hope you will lay off from are people like this female poster on unplugged who is a perfectly decent poster whom you routinely try to ridicule on account of her being panjabi. Behave like a rat, and you get called one as well.
I am sorry if the above sounds unfriendly, but contrary to what you think, I dont do ``veiled`` meanings, nor do I have any reason to be hypocritical on anything since I am not running for chowk mayor.
I wish you and all others on chowk all the best, and sincerely mean everything I wrote below, but that does not mean that you have the right to take advantage of posters who due to age or gender or merely self-respect are not willing to get back to you in the same language that you use for them.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- BJ2: Re: # 238 Arjun, the... Muslims in America
- Eklavya: shattered, agreed. And normal... Muslim Ghettoisation
- truth100: NDocR, I have two maids... Diabetes: Wrestling with a
- truth100: BTW, who is 101?... Diabetes: Wrestling with a
- truth100: Quin, Beautiful Poem! Though I... Diabetes: Wrestling with a
- sattar2: BJ2 (#237), I am giggling... Muslims in America
- NDocR: Re: # 35 Dear... Diabetes: Wrestling with a
- NDocR: Re: # 35 Dear... Diabetes: Wrestling with a








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content