unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Pakistan – The Threat From Within

Pervez Hoodbhoy May 31, 2007

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#393 Posted by masadi on November 5, 2007 6:36:51 am
idiots always come up with ad hominem because they are scared of facts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#392 Posted by nehal on July 5, 2007 10:26:04 pm
Folks, mushy is the least of your problems, you have in front of you a 14th centruy old monster trying to engulf the whole region with darkness, Now is the time to close all madaris across the country, and force these so called imams to earn daily bread for themselves, who needs these illiterates anyway reciting gabla gook without any understanding of it, allow only M.A. in islamic studies from universities to be able to work as Imam of a masjid [filter/ijtihad all the jihad from the courses] , the nation has to stop funding these potbellys.
encourage some freedom in fatith
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#391 Posted by Folio on June 10, 2007 4:35:13 pm
assADI,

>>Once again you prove yourself to be a damn fool who has no knowledge of US society, or the stratification based on race, sex and gender that exists there. You have no clue of segregation of African Americans in US society, or the disparity of incomes and wealth commanded by the top compared to the bottom...<<

Stratification based on race, sex and gender?????????????????






Do u mean to say that countries other than the US had unisex population, assADI??






As for race, it`s in the minds of people like u who does not even share a seat on subway with blacks.

Ur dumbass shud know that the US has the BEST social policies in the world (san the Nordic countries). If somebody like Stanley O`Neil (a black) became the CEO of Merril Lynch, it`s becoz Stan is a citizen of the USA & there`s no discrimination based on sex, race.

U say that the US treats ppl accoring to their race??

As for racial segregation, the Govt of the US had no policy 4 the establishment of catchment areas. If a social group lives in an area it`s bcoz they`d like to live together
(eg. China town, New Jersey etc.,).

If the income disparities are there, it`s bcoz of the general apathy of the black masses BUT whoever made efforts has reached there. U see how Indians and Chinese are at the top of the income ranges among immigrants?

I hope this is my last post to ur DUMB-assaDI.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#390 Posted by masadi on June 10, 2007 10:28:38 am
Folio writes <<< Social Structure as we understand in our part of the world is different from the one u see in the US. There`s nothing like the structure there. There`s no high-low thing among her people. There`s no 2/3/4-kinds of ppl.

All are equal in all spheres of life. >>>

Once again you prove yourself to be a damn fool who has no knowledge of US society, or the stratification based on race, sex and gender that exists there. You have no clue of segregation of African Americans in US society, or the disparity of incomes and wealth commanded by the top compared to the bottom... I don`t like wasting time with fools spewing Fox News propaganda... write something half way intelligent or you`ll receive no response...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#389 Posted by Folio on June 9, 2007 2:35:53 pm
There`re no 2/3/4-kinds of ppl.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#388 Posted by Folio on June 9, 2007 2:30:07 pm
U messed it up assADI,

Social Structure as we understand in our part of the world is different from the one u see in the US. There`s nothing like the structure there. There`s no high-low thing among her people. There`s no 2/3/4-kinds of ppl.

All are equal in all spheres of life.

The ONLY ethereal structure, if u wish to call it, is an informal & economic order which by itself is NOT a structure for the very reason it`s highly unstable; therefore I am not born into a structure for the rest of my life, nor wud u b.

As 4 military, we all had it, not jut the US.

Better u cut down on ur `impressive` phrase and take care of the `points`.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#387 Posted by masadi on June 9, 2007 12:22:42 pm
In addition, when economists talk about ``structural unemployment`` they are talking about problems produced by the ``structure`` of a particular economic institution, and not individual characteristics of the various unemployed. Now illiterate fool, FOLIO, you want me to explain it to you further? Indeed if there is no regularity or structure to things studying them becomes quite impossible, you could study all 160 million in Pakistan and even then be unable to scientifically generalize without a ``structure``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#386 Posted by masadi on June 9, 2007 12:16:23 pm
Folio writes <<<
Existence of military in the US constitutes existence of social structure? >>>>

The military and its role in the institutional setup of the US is indeed part of the social structure of the US. The US military itself has a structure that is quite visible, it is much different to the free floating militia that existed in early US history, and much different to the structure of Taliban style ``militaries``.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#385 Posted by Zeena on June 9, 2007 8:25:56 am
#384 is the reply to the above article.........

[[Pakistan....The threat with in]]].....

Yes, this is the threat with in.................

From the board of Pakistan tehreek-e-Insaf.com

[[[i came across an audio tape recorded on 1987, in which altaf of mqm says: ``mahajiro! aslah kharido aslah, tv vcr chhoro, aslah kharido``. mqm is first organization of its kind in pakistan, which started its activities on the basis of smuggled arms. thousands and thousands of pakistanis have been killed by the terrorists of this organization. mqm`s terrorists are trained in bharat by bharti army. the same bharti army once trained mukti bahini of east pakistan. i read a news story in an old news paper of 1987, in which a pashto speaking muslim was ziped with iron belts and then blown up alive by throwing petrol and then fire. innocent poor pashtoon was requesting: `` please kill me with gun, but please do not blow me up`` mqm`s terrorists were laghing and taunting at the cry of that pashtoon. just imagine the scene in your dreams. mqm has killed thousands and thousands of innocent muslims like that. this is just one single example. any pakistani who believes in quran and our innocent prophet (pbuh) will always hate this terrorist mqm. mqm has purchased millions of dollars of armory from afghan war lords in 1980s. but underground members of zia`s govt like aslam baig and pervaiz musharraf provided full support to this terrorist organization. they had organized fake fights between panjabis,sindhis,pashtoons and urdu speaking community just to strengthen terrorist mqm. whenever see a mqm member just remember these events. these members represent those terrorists,who have unromovable spots of blood on their faces. just always remember it. if you support mqm, it means you support killers, murderers, and remember our prophet (pbuh) never support murderers. please choose the prophet`s way(pbuh). thank you.]]]]
www.tehreek-e-insaaf.com
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#384 Posted by Zeena on June 9, 2007 7:45:42 am
From the board of Pakistan tehreek-e-Insaf.com

[[[i came across an audio tape recorded on 1987, in which altaf of mqm says: ``mahajiro! aslah kharido aslah, tv vcr chhoro, aslah kharido``. mqm is first organization of its kind in pakistan, which started its activities on the basis of smuggled arms. thousands and thousands of pakistanis have been killed by the terrorists of this organization. mqm`s terrorists are trained in bharat by bharti army. the same bharti army once trained mukti bahini of east pakistan. i read a news story in an old news paper of 1987, in which a pashto speaking muslim was ziped with iron belts and then blown up alive by throwing petrol and then fire. innocent poor pashtoon was requesting: `` please kill me with gun, but please do not blow me up`` mqm`s terrorists were laghing and taunting at the cry of that pashtoon. just imagine the scene in your dreams. mqm has killed thousands and thousands of innocent muslims like that. this is just one single example. any pakistani who believes in quran and our innocent prophet (pbuh) will always hate this terrorist mqm. mqm has purchased millions of dollars of armory from afghan war lords in 1980s. but underground members of zia`s govt like aslam baig and pervaiz musharraf provided full support to this terrorist organization. they had organized fake fights between panjabis,sindhis,pashtoons and urdu speaking community just to strengthen terrorist mqm. whenever see a mqm member just remember these events. these members represent those terrorists,who have unromovable spots of blood on their faces. just always remember it. if you support mqm, it means you support killers, murderers, and remember our prophet (pbuh) never support murderers. please choose the prophet`s way(pbuh). thank you.]]]]
www.tehreek-e-insaaf.com
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#383 Posted by Folio on June 8, 2007 2:40:10 am
ASSadi,

>>Every society has a structure on how roles, arranged in heirarchies (status) persist to form institutions which interact with each other held together by a culture. If you are denying that a family institution exists in the US, that an economy that reproduces inequality, based on private ownership exists in the US, a military as a standardized institution exists in the US.....<<

Yepp, now come to the point. If existence of family structure is called social structure, then all countries in this world had this.

As for the issue of private ownership in the US, does any country, san Cuba hadnt had this? How u expect everybody to have private ownership or everybody to work but not own any businesss enterprises? U must be outta ur mind, ASSadi.

In effect u dont accept capitalism?? May be u must move to Cuba then.

Existence of military in the US constitutes existence of social structure?

ASSadi, u made an ass of ur self.

I cant stop hohohoing now.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#382 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 2:56:11 pm
#381 by chaltahai on June 7, 2007 2:53pm PT


your islamofascists blow cars up.


his suicide bomber brothers make car parts...out of cars...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#381 Posted by chaltahai on June 7, 2007 2:53:23 pm
Re: # 380

Who the heck is this US Elite you keep going on about? Here is the reality..those countries and people in the world that worked and leveraged the models laid out under US global leadership, prospered. China and India realized this too late..but better late then never. Chinese and Indians make car parts..your islamofascists blow cars up. That is the reality you ninny!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#380 Posted by masadi on June 7, 2007 11:04:12 am
The sob in #379 was claiming that sociologists have no role in the economy and the well being of the people, and the field is useless. Regarding that bs assertion, I informed him of project camelot where the US elite saw the value of sociologists for THEIR OWN society`s economic well being by being informants due to their knowledge of the potential for internal conflict in Latin American countries and how that could be suppressed in order to keep non democratic governments in power, and I also informed him that sociologists being aware of the working of a society are in a much better position than economists to build consciousness among people for their betterment.

This answer he perverted, in his usual dishonest and immoral fashion to conclude that the only gainful employment for sociologists is being tools of imperial powers. Dishonest AHs like him need to ignored.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#379 Posted by arjun2 on June 7, 2007 10:30:03 am
#377 by masadi on June 7, 2007 10:08am PT

the sociologists, people whose only value is that they are tools of imperial powers seeking to overthrow democracies, are irrelevant.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#378 Posted by masadi on June 7, 2007 10:14:47 am
Folio writes <<< I asked u to prove if the US society had any social structure? Instead a picked-up a microscopic straw in the form of a title in one of the RK Merton`s books i/o proving that the US society is structured which u say breeds discrimination. >>

You don`t understand what ``social structure`` means, your question tells that amply. Every society has a structure on how roles, arranged in heirarchies (status) persist to form institutions which interact with each other held together by a culture. If you are denying that a family institution exists in the US, that an economy that reproduces inequality, based on private ownership exists in the US, a military as a standardized institution exists in the US, as does the state apparatus, then what can we talk abou? You question was quite idiotic, I disagree with people who say there can be no stupid questions, maybe for kids but not for those that claim to study as institutions of higher learning; this indeed was quite an idiotic question that shows how uninformed you are about both US society and the world...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#377 Posted by masadi on June 7, 2007 10:08:25 am
chaltahai writes <<< no one and I mean no one in India or outside will deny that the market reforms taken after 1991 have been the best thing that have happened for the Indian citizenry. >>>

I am denying it, and I am ONE, there are many others just here who will deny it, once again your post has zero evidence and many slogans and BS
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#376 Posted by Folio on June 6, 2007 6:53:39 pm
GT,

That`s hilarious but true in evey respect.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#375 Posted by GT on June 6, 2007 6:50:54 pm
Re: # 374 by Folio:

``I think I shud be more reticent in ur presence``

Please do not do as such .... disrespect, arrogance, pure intelligence, different perspectives, and `total time-waste` are some of the many features of chowk that attract me.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#374 Posted by Folio on June 6, 2007 6:28:31 pm
GT,

I was there for 2006 batch 4 M.Sc.

We have 2 Bengali professors in our dept. I hardly attended seminars or guest lectures except the one by Prof. Daniel Bernhofen (specialist in Comparative Advantage, who taught us Intl Trade).

U know Clive Granger sounds very lovely. Dr. Tim Lloyd is reminiscent of Dr. Granger.

I think I shud be more reticent in ur presence (coy). Thanks.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#373 Posted by GT on June 6, 2007 6:18:58 pm
Folio,

Folio, the size of applicants do not imply that the selected candidates are `intelligent`. I shall dwell no longer on this issue as it is not that important to me. But what interests me is that you are from Nottingham. If so you might have seen me ;). I presented a seminar there (Theory) in the past. When?... I want to keep my identity secret ... to the extent possible.

By the way, lets say that Granger and I know each other.

Cheers.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#372 Posted by Folio on June 6, 2007 5:19:34 pm
GT,

I dont know why Stiglitz said this (abt the World Bank). Even getting internship in the World Bank and IMF is very very difficult. There are more than 10K+ applicants for 34 or so internships. U can imagine how difficult it is? More over they take students form across as many countries as possible. We had an opportunity to hear a presentation from a World Bank official (ex-student of our Uni) at Nottingham University in 2006. (Btw, our Department produced one Nobel Laurate Dr. Clive Granger for Time Series; now prof emuritius at UCAL, San Diego).

Asadi,

The way u skip my questions, I dont have an iota of doubt in my mind that u screw-up the future of ur students with this dodgy attitude and dilatory tactics.

I asked u to prove if the US society had any social structure? Instead a picked-up a microscopic straw in the form of a title in one of the RK Merton`s books i/o proving that the US society is structured which u say breeds discrimination.

With ur background & education u`d have been a non-entity in ur society (US) and profession had the US has been as racist & discriminatory as the KSA.

I expect scholars to be honest in whatever they say. U must be a pretentious scholar.

Do write something that stands the test of scrutiny of else keep writing reams abt Qoran in noodle script, so that u can avoid our needling, stupid professor!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#371 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 12:43:31 pm
#369 by chaltahai on June 6, 2007 12:08pm PT


fools like Masadi who decry US Elite


Masadi says his only prospects of gainful employment outside public dole is when the ``US elite`` hire him to supress Latin American democracies...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#370 Posted by chaltahai on June 6, 2007 12:16:11 pm
Re: # 367: and as to your agricultural point. Shift in sectoral contributions to the GDP are inevitable. In absolute dollar and percentage terms the agricultural sector has been contributing greatly to the Indian growth story. Overtime, it will go down in percentage terms as it does in evey development scenario as manufacturing adn services make up the lions share of the output. Indian manufacturing sector is now growing at a double digit clip, more liberalization and looser employment laws will enable this to subsume a greater number of people from the agrarian economy. It happens everywhere, India is no different, it is simply used a different model than china to get to a sustained level of growth.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#369 Posted by chaltahai on June 6, 2007 12:08:52 pm
Re: # 367: China used a FDI driven model to sustain growth. India has used a FII and domestic consumption led model to fuel it`s growth. India is where China was in the late 1980`s. Give it time. It will even out. Fact of the matter is that fools like Masadi who decry US Elite (whatever that is) for the ills of the world are misplacing their blame. It is infact the US leadership in pushing for globalization and market based economies that have had the biggest benefit on the poor of the world. compare poverty rates in India and China pre-WWII, 10 yrs post-WWII, and 15 years post reforms in both countries.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#368 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 11:58:49 am
#364 by PewResearch on June 6, 2007 10:56am PT

please don`t quote that article and make masadi more uncomfortable...pakis are not on friendly terms with reality...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#367 Posted by zeemax on June 6, 2007 11:25:57 am
#366 by chaltahai

A globally integrated market economy does not uplift the rural sector. But we can discuss it.

Has India planned something for it`s agricultural sector better than 2%+(-) growth next fiscal?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#366 Posted by chaltahai on June 6, 2007 11:19:26 am
Re: # 365: Zeemax, that is exactly the point. Masadi is decrying the US Model of capitalism led growth as an anathema to the poor around the world. But it was exactly that this model that the chinese in 1978 and Indians in 1991 adopted and the results are hugely infavor of a globally integrated market economy
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#365 Posted by zeemax on June 6, 2007 11:01:21 am
#363 by chaltahai,

Not meaning to butt in but give masadi a break. To get at the reality of your ``tremendous change in the health, wealth and educational fortunes of Indians across the socioeconomic spectrum``, compare the balancing of sectoral growth in China with yours.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#364 Posted by PewResearch on June 6, 2007 10:56:12 am
Re: # 292 Arjun2

The crux of the matter is this extract from your post...

``Contrary to the widely held view among apologists and supporters of military dictatorships, the real per capita income is not only higher in India but the gap has increased since 1999. In that year, India’s per capita income was 25 per cent higher than Pakistan’s and in 2005 it was 46 per cent higher in purchasing power parity terms. ``

I would also specify that this needs to be considered by apologists of Jinnah, TNT, Lahore Resolution, YLH, and others
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#363 Posted by chaltahai on June 6, 2007 10:24:48 am
Masadi, you Fool, no one and I mean no one in India or outside will deny that the market reforms taken after 1991 have been the best thing that have happened for the Indian citizenry. Non-alignment and socialist policies and license raj of 40 years made hardly a dent in the social condition of Indians. Yet in a brief span of 15 years of market led reforms, we have seen a tremendous change in the health, wealth and educational fortunes of Indians across the socioeconomic spectrum
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#362 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 10:09:42 am
#361 by masadi on June 6, 2007 9:48am PT


A lot, Project Camelot that wanted to ensure a booming US economy by dominating Latin American countries


Ok...so we`ve found one use for sociologists:according to you, they are needed by imperial powers who want to dominate poor countries....

so what`s this conscience thing you want me to get and where can I get a good deal on it?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#361 Posted by masadi on June 6, 2007 9:48:34 am
Arjun writes <<< what productive value does a sociologist - especially a failed one - bring to the economy? >>>

A lot, Project Camelot that wanted to ensure a booming US economy by dominating Latin American countries didn`t ask for economists to devise plans in which ``utility`` might be maximized,nooo they didn`t do that, they knew better they were tying to hire sociologists, alright, and on the flip side sociologists that know the workings of the whole (i.e. structure) can better educate the masses to demand their due from the system and thus give them life, health and political power through consciousness, as well as prevent economic collapse due to capitalist anarchy. Need more reasons to study sociology? Of course not because the damn fool that you are, you`d sell your mama for a few bucks and that would be a fine addition to any ``economy``. Get a conscience fool,.....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#360 Posted by masadi on June 6, 2007 9:42:28 am
Folio writes <<< I cant remeber any expert Max Weber, Emile Durkhiem, Karl Marx or RK Merton talking abt this `social structure` >>>

Really, what would the sum total of ``social facts`` discussed by Emile Durkheim or his mechanical vs organic solidarity be? What would Max Weber`s rationalization of social structure refer to? A hamburger? What about super structure and substructure that Marx talked about and RK Merton wrote a whole damn book, lying on my desk right now and the title reads: `` Social Theory and Social Structure``

Now, run along with Arjun who can only respond with slogans and don`t waste my time...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#359 Posted by masadi on June 6, 2007 9:37:26 am
GT writes <<< Though I still claim that masadi knows zilch about economics and statistics, >>>

My dear friend, I know a little more than ``Zilch`` about economics and statistics, I have a BS degree, summa cum laude in Economics, top of my class, from a state university in the US, not the best of course but a fully accredited one of good repute. As for stats, you cannot get a degree in soc without studying it at fairly advanced levels,

Sincerely,

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#358 Posted by GT on June 6, 2007 8:52:29 am
Re: # 357 by arjun2

Let alone masadi, I will go ahead and assert that these UN, World Bank and IMF types know sh** about economics and statistics. As Stiglitz said these institutions are filled with third rate students from first rate institutions (not that Stiglitz himself does not get carried away at times).

Take this relationship between GDP and poverty that chaltahai talks about ... mainstream economists will laugh at this idea. Bhagwati and Sachs are way past their prime and mostly talk to policy types where essentially you sell bullsh**.

Finally, do not get me wrong. Though I still claim that masadi knows zilch about economics and statistics, he is much better than many of my students who are in the IMF and the WB today. In fact, those who we refuse to send to the academic market end up in these institutions. Don`t trust me call and ask any prof., you know, in any decent univ.

Cheers.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#357 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 8:02:20 am
#356 by GT on June 6, 2007 7:58am PT

sociologists know a lot about poverty...most of them are poor, unable to make a honest buck that isn`t taxpayer dole...There are a lot of rich writers and economists..their skills have practical applications..sociology is just a field imported from the imperial west..I`m sure there`s a US elite somewhere who made good money selling books on sociology....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#356 Posted by GT on June 6, 2007 7:58:06 am
Re: # 346 by masadi:

``Economists don`t know sh** about poverty.``

And you sir, don`t know sh** about economics .... and statistics.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#355 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 7:24:28 am
it`s not funny dude...every paisa paid to masadi for his useless course is a paisa that could have been spent on some real education for abdul jr...Do you think abdul jr is better served by a course that has reading material from andrew tannenbaum or one that recycles socialist bull crap from mills?

As it is, and I`m sure masadi knows it, Pakiland spends a lot more on it`s military than it does on education..in fact, the numbers are exactly the opposite of those in India..

While scarce education resources are being spent on sociology, a field imported from the imperial west, abdul paki is forced to send his kid to a saudi funded madrassah where the only contact with real books is when he takes over a library demanding sharia..
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#354 Posted by Folio on June 6, 2007 6:40:54 am
Arjun,

U are no longer a cut-paste Chowkie. Original ideas are welcome here. Well said:-)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#353 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 6:17:46 am
all of masadi`s skills in sociology aren`t good enough to earn him a honest buck..what productive value does a sociologist - especially a failed one - bring to the economy? All his sociologist theories don`t amount to a hill of beans...

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#352 Posted by arjun2 on June 6, 2007 5:54:00 am
masadi: you are a third grade sociologist who couldn`t hack it in an American university and had to go back to the land of the pure to take job where temporary German faculty, probably well paid, is thrust upon you. You are a failure as a writer which explains why you are only getting published by lulu.com.

you don`t know your ass from your elbow..and if you do, it`s only because your brain is is in your ass..

Now go back and chew on the news report I posted about the paki government fooling pakis about the GDP numbers....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#351 Posted by Folio on June 6, 2007 5:36:20 am
Asadi,

I imagined u as a learned man but u dont look that. U look more like a prisoner of language. U use English language to show-off ur `perceived skills` as a commentator of issues, though u have none.

>>...traced to a social structure that devalues and stratifies humanity, objectifies it as a thing to be used and assigns status...<<

Stupid professor, can u tell us what the social structure u have in the US? I still remeber my UPSC Mains-level sociology. I cant remeber any expert Max Weber, Emile Durkhiem, Karl Marx or RK Merton talking abt this `social structure`. Tell me if u found some structure and codified that in the corpus of Socilogy literature?

U cant distinguish btw the US foreign policy (Rudolph`s comment) and internal social policies or general shared consciousness that all laws in the US conform to the unwritten code of humanity!

U need to unlearn a lot, stupid professor.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#350 Posted by masadi on June 6, 2007 4:11:48 am
In addition,

(Quote) Wednesday, June 6, 2007. (Reuters)

``You shouldn`t take any options off the table,`` said the leader in the Republican pack, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, when asked whether a tactical nuclear strike might be necessary.``

(end Quote)

A society which cheers such ``macho`` rhetoric cannot surely be expected to value life- not to mention that objective facts that exist in their history for which consent is always manufactured, regardless of the barbarity of the proposed or completed action...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#349 Posted by masadi on June 6, 2007 4:08:42 am
Folio writes <<< There is no set social structure in the US as we have in India and Pakistan and the American society DOESN`T devalue humanity >>>

Don`t try to teach me about American society, I not only have academic knowledge about it, I also have personal experience living in that society for over a decade and manage to combine both in my writings. Virginia tech (and how the media treated it) was NOT an exceptional occurrence or what the public wanted to hear. The media contours public opinions (as revealed time and again by opinion polls), it builds desires and sells policies and products, none of this would be possible were we to take your explanation of the media only broadcasts what the ``public`` wants to hear. Regarding Al Jaz, Bin Laden finds it very convenient to supply them with videos that become fodder for the American media, it`s location in Qatar, a US military satellite state, and how it has managed to build legitimacy among the Arabs, reeks of being another one of the CIA`s many media concerns.

The VT massacre was not a ``personal`` issue of the student involved, many go through similar ``personal`` troubles that are not person specific but can be traced to a social structure that devalues and stratifies humanity, objectifies it as a thing to be used and assigns status based on things the means to achieve which it provides only to a few; neither are these occurrences like the VT massacre this widespread in other societies for us to conclude that it was a psychological abberation of a person responding to personal troubles. Finally about the US media, it is not ``nilly willy`` broadcast to the rest of the world. The culture industry of the USA is very active in promoting violence, materialism and US dominance through implicit means to the rest of the world. The picture of the US presented by this media is not the same as the REAL America, as people well know, not demographically, not materially and neither in excitement- as people living the predictible, bureaucratic dull life of the US understand well, those that are not intoxicated by movies that is.

p.s. I stand by my assertion that you are an idiot where it comes to understanding the US and the world.....

Sincerely,

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#348 Posted by Folio on June 6, 2007 3:29:00 am
Not becoz they are in the payroll of the CIA and US Admin but bcoz the coverage is meant for the American public but willy nilly broadcast to the WHOLE world.

The reasons for this willy nilly are: Business (money) and the receptive audience outside the US. Ppl outside the US like the things that are American. Now we have Al Jazeera (English). I watch this a lot as I am sick of the CNN. Again, I am getting sick of AJ as it`s focussing only on arab standpoint.

May be it`s impossible to have a perfect news orgn that`s not pandering to any audiences.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#347 Posted by Folio on June 6, 2007 2:56:44 am
Asadi,

Now I know why u write such lengthy sentences (coz u are a teacher).

Now let me separate the article into 3 groups. a. Virginia Tech Massacre b. Iraq Invasion
c. Media coverage in the US as a proxy to American dominance.

In my view VT massacre is a personal issue of one Korean immigrant

Iraq war, as what they say in the American media, is a lie. It`s Amercian invasion (British media uses the latter expression).

Media coverage is ur big complaint. I understand that. American media has this global reach. Even when they are beaming their programmes to the ppl of Cambodia, the newscasters in CNN & Fox parrot the same stuff that it`s meant to be addressed to the American public. ( CNN has different wings like CNN Asia, Europe etc but main news is the same to all the wings).

WHY THEY DO THIS?

Not becoz they are in the payroll of the CIA and US Admin but bcoz the coverage is meant for the American public but willy nilly broadcast to the WHOLE world.

>>the social structure in which people`s lives are lived in the US, one that objectifies and devalues humanity and has grades of worth assigned to different lives based on how close they are to the US elite<<

There is no set social structure in the US as we have in India and Pakistan and the American society DOESN`T devalue humanity. In the developed world, human being is at the centre of all laws and policies.

>>>Why is it that the person responded the way that he did, what role does the cultural apparatus in the US play in such reactions and why do such episodes happen moreso in that society<<<

NRA, I think. This rifle carrying was a necessity in the initial stages of American history. It (rifle carrying) was meant to subjugate the Indians (US) there. Otherwise I dont see why they needed them (bcoz the same goras b4 migration to the US were not using them in native Europe).

I am always puzzled as to why they still insist on having a right to carry fire arms. Lobbies are very powerful in the US (Pl see `Distinguished Gentleman` 2 know more). Gun lobby is no less.

>>You on the other hand do not understand any of these things...<<

Finally, thanks 4 realising that I am dumb idiot.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#346 Posted by masadi on June 5, 2007 10:30:59 pm
chaltahai writes <<< A second year student of economics knows the relationship between elasticity of poverty vis-a-vis the rate of GDP growth >>>

Economists don`t know sh** about poverty. Regardless of growth in GDP poverty remains more or less constant unless drastic measures are taken to improve distribution and none of the dominant institutions, that are ensuring growth in India, emphasise that. The poperty percent around the globe has stayed more or less the same but what that means is that almost double the number of people live in live in poverty today than did in the previous generation due to population increase.

India cannot approach the GDP of the US, yet a large percentage of the population has constantly been below the poverty line in the US even given its crude measures of poverty (India`s are much more cruder like I said) I have read many UNDP reports and they are the ones whose stats I was quoting. How come the World Bank says that more people per every 100 live in poverty in India than Pakistan, where is your magic number there? Fewer have access to clean water than in Pakistan, More children are underweight than in Pakistan. More people have a lesser life expectancy than 40 at birth compared to Pakistan. Which ``economist`` is going to save you given these FACTS? You cannot answer even one of these and so resort to BS concepts like the ``elasticity of poverty``. If calculating a number was that easy, poverty would not have existed in the world today. As is the problem with all economics, social structure and decisions taken within them are ignored and utilitarian/hedonistic principles that assume equality of all are emphasised. The world does not work this way. Skimming the surplus regardless of 100% growth in GDP will result in zero poverty allevation and the only allevation you will see is in atrociously crude measures of poverty, invented to deceive the masses, and MIT peons like other IVY league peons have mastered in doing just that, the level of your ``real`` scholarship is evident for all to see. All you can muster is say read this report, read that report and you don`t know what the content of the report is neither do you know where it is located....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#345 Posted by masadi on June 5, 2007 10:08:17 pm
Folio writes <<< If u were a trained sociologist, then why did u write that Virginia Tech massacre was the result of American imperialism >>>>

Firstly, I did not put ``imperialism`` as the cause, I put the cause as the social structure in which people`s lives are lived in the US, one that objectifies and devalues humanity and has grades of worth assigned to different lives based on how close they are to the US elite, that was the extent of the comparison with Iraq. Second, not only am I a sociologist, I also teach criminology and know as fact that psychological and biological explanations of criminal behavior are quite inadequate, because not only are laws, socially formed, crime itself is relative and varies from time to time, society to society etc making it a specifically SOCIAL phenomenon. Why is it that the person responded the way that he did, what role does the cultural apparatus in the US play in such reactions and why do such episodes happen moreso in that society rather than in others was what I sought to answer in that paper. You on the other hand do not understand any of these things, all you want to do is deceive through sloganeering and using ``straw men`` in a most illogical fashion show your opponent in a bad light. Read that article again, and think about what I wrote Worthy and Unworthy Victims: The Virginia Tech Massacre & Iraq
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#344 Posted by Zeena on June 5, 2007 8:09:37 pm
Only this man can save Pakistan...Listen (part111)

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#343 Posted by Zeena on June 5, 2007 7:58:00 pm
Only this man can save pakistan...Listen(part11)







reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#342 Posted by Zeena on June 5, 2007 7:35:38 pm
Only this man can save pakistan..Listen
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5930487182973309034&q=5930487182973309034
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#341 Posted by Folio on June 5, 2007 5:57:26 pm
Masadi,

If u were a trained sociologist, then why did u write that Virginia Tech massacre was the result of American imperialism? How come?

It doesnt need Dr. Sohail to explain that it`s the pent-up feelings of an isolated foreign student who exploded in rage for a range of reasons, including possesiveness (4a girl).

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#340 Posted by chaltahai on June 5, 2007 12:31:06 pm
Re: # 337 You are an idiot. if there is a growing middle class and the mobility is a upward shift, then how can you say poverty allevaitaion and income distribution is not taking place? Go read any UNDP report and do a time series analysis on Indian poverty from 1950 to last year. Look at the rate of decline just in the last 10 years.

A second year student of economics knows the relationship between elasticity of poverty vis-a-vis the rate of GDP growth. In India the baseline is 7%, any % point above that takes about 10`s of millions out of poverty. Google it and search under Bhagwati, Sachs etc..idiot
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#339 Posted by masadi on June 5, 2007 11:21:44 am
In #337 read <<< A while back I had posted an article which compared perent while the trends of poverty ... >>> as


<<< A while back I had posted an article which compared percent wise the trends of poverty... >>>
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#338 Posted by masadi on June 5, 2007 11:18:13 am
arjun writes <<< BTW, masadi....I heard you are back working for the peon factory... >>>

Not at all I don`t work at a peon creating factory, I work at the department of sociology at a public university where I am autonomous and do not accept the BS from anyone...not an MBA school that has borrowed its name from an institution in the UK, run by an Ass H who was a third rate CSP officer who sold his soul to the world bank and America....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#337 Posted by masadi on June 5, 2007 11:14:46 am
chaltahai writes <<< Each percent point over 7% GDP growth takes over 15 million out of poverty in India. >>>

What are your sources for this contention? I provided you with my sources from the World Bank and the UN and once again you respond with slogans disgracing yourself and your institution, MIT. How can 15 million be taken out of poverty when the government of India does not even know how to measure poverty? It takes the ``food line`` as if people don`t have other needs, even the vile US elite define their poverty as food times three to understate their poverty, the Indians outdo even their perversion in this regard. A while back I had posted an article which compared perent while the trends of poverty reduction in India back when it was unaligned and now, and there was no difference whatsoever because even while making more, capitalist India is not distributing the surplus....comprendey or will you have to sweep the floors of Harvard in order to get that?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#336 Posted by chaltahai on June 5, 2007 8:02:47 am
Masadi, you are an ullu..plain and simple. Since 1991 the rise of the middle class in India has seen a greater growth rate then ever before. These people didn;t come down from the uberwealthy to create such a monolith..they came from below. Each percent point over 7% GDP growth takes over 15 million out of poverty in India. None of this happened when india was unaligned, outside the global economic and financial system. Thye numbers simply don;t support your tirades. If being unaligned is what it is cracked up to be..then the shining examples are N Korea, India (pre-1991), China (pre-1978) and Cuba (post castro) as examples. Pick any indicator pre and post amalgamation into the globa l economy (Which is led by the US). Ullu kahein ka
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#335 Posted by Folio on June 4, 2007 4:10:06 pm
Chennai,

Yeah..it`s good in many aspects and getting better every year but I cry for the Gneissic rocks of Hyerabad. The naturally beautiful rocks were pulverised by the tasteless construction companies and indifferent public.

You cant find the same kinds of rocks in any other city in the world. These rocks formed aeons ago are gone forever.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#334 Posted by GT on June 4, 2007 2:41:08 pm
Re: # 333 by zeemax,

Yup,

You had me more confused there. I come to chowk this morning and see this discussion all over the place from UP to FP, from sadna to atif, .... all about democracy and Islam. And then to top it all echo puts up an article equating Islam to fascism and then in UP he says that it is `language` that matters.

Zee this used to be a simple place with a little bit of gaali here and there but now it has become all `intellectual` with Salim refusing to walk in front of Hamid and kaal asking everyone to respect everyone else ..... I mean I have this picture in mind of ali1 and arjun2 `respecting` each other ..... no hard feelings kaal, but ....

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#333 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 1:47:38 pm
#330 by GT,

Oops sorry ... you were talking about the other article .... I think I should let echo answer that question ... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#332 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 1:44:46 pm
#330 by GT,

GT it was about Imam Ka`aba`s visit to Pakistan and his statements, particularly his saying that May Allah protect Musharraf from `jealous` people.

About that the columnist is satirizing that more than uttering the truth against a ruler, it is a bigger virtue to utter the truth against the people because the ruler will either kill you so then you`ll become immortal, or he`ll buy you off. While if you speak the truth against the people, they will ostracise you for good. So doing that is real bravery.

Then about his statement that Jihad can only be declared by a Government, the columnist is saying that sure ... the Kashmiris should have asked Manmohan Singh or Afghanis should have asked Karzai if it was OK first.

... and much more. :~)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#331 Posted by arjun2 on June 4, 2007 12:53:04 pm
#326 by Urstruly on June 4, 2007 11:51am PT

Click on his name, then click on the interacts link...

why hasn`t chowk staff upped his karma rating? he`s been in the shitcan for a long time now..
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#330 Posted by GT on June 4, 2007 12:19:35 pm
Re: # 329 by zeemax:

Yaar zee,

What was that article all about? My head is spinning. Is Maulana Boom sahib anti `Islamic State`?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#329 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 12:15:16 pm
#327 by GT,

How can I dare to do that? Echoboom is the Imam. I`m just a foot-soldier.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#328 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 12:13:27 pm
#326 by Urstruly,

Only after a few extra clicks ... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#327 Posted by GT on June 4, 2007 12:09:17 pm


Boom sahib:

``The supreme clerical leader is our custodian (qayyem), and we are like sheep that if separated from our shepherd would surely be lost.``


Baa baa black sheep?

Zee please feel free to answer on Boom`s behalf.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#326 Posted by Urstruly on June 4, 2007 11:51:59 am

How come everybody can see Echoboom`s posts but me.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#325 Posted by Urstruly on June 4, 2007 11:50:02 am
Re: # 324

I think it has become a rule now that when these dictators, secularoons, liberaloons, and roshan khayal motherates are at the end of their rope then these scoundrels find their last refuge in Islam. Remember that secularist enlightened motherate Saddam Hussain, who after receiving jutaybaazi in the first gulf war, revised the design of Iraq`s flag and added Allaho Akbar to it. There were even some publicity pictures of him showing praying sitting at a mussalla. Pakistani chutiya is one step ahead of him- says he had opportunities to enter K`aba hence he is blessed and everybody must submit to him. ass whole.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#324 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 11:34:52 am
Echoboom re Zeemax:309

...well here is one of the best satirical pieces about His hole-iness, the ghulaam-i-Saudia.
Pervez Muaavia seems to have gone bonkers....


Yes I had read it but worthwhile reproducing here.

The Chief Sarkari Maulvi ... he has made a fool of himself ... and to think someone thought he`ld not be ridiculed for his leading the prayers in Ka`aba on king`s payroll. What a munafiq!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#323 Posted by echoboom on June 4, 2007 11:16:12 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#322 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 11:15:06 am
... contd ...#320

Translation of just the last verse (best effort):

Just like the dew which cools the heart of a flower;
But a storm to instill fear in hearts of mighty rivers!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#321 Posted by GT on June 4, 2007 11:05:32 am
Re: # 123 by HP


HP,

Thanks for your overview.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#320 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 9:50:03 am
With reference to #296:

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#319 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 9:18:58 am
#306 by HP

Echo, Btw, the sina ba sina story I have heard is that Mush baba will be gone in early July. Provincial governments may go right after the budget. NWFP followed by Sindh.

I hope so but the signs don`t point in that direction. A complete muzzle on the press is in effect and particularly after the PEMRA ordinance of yesterday giving it powers to revoke licences (which it didn`t have before), it looks like GEO News`s goose is cooked which has been shut down since yesterday anyway. Besides Government has leaned on cable operators as well who have said they will stop delivering any channel which broadcasts anything against the army.

Pir Pagara has a strong argument when he says why would there be elections when the sitting government doesn`t have a political party. Would they have these for the opposition?

What do you think?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#318 Posted by echoboom on June 4, 2007 7:00:28 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#317 Posted by Chennai on June 4, 2007 4:47:11 am
Folio, I was in Hyderabad on 2nd June and must say that it is one of our best cities in terms of cost of living and infra.........

However the Hyderabad of my childhood has almost disappeared.........What used to be a magnificient hilly area is know called Mahendra Hills with only a few rocks & boulders as a poor substitute for those hills....................

But the culture and food remain almost the same.........especially the Hyderabadi Biryani...............
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#316 Posted by Folio on June 4, 2007 4:19:27 am
Add on, Chennai,

Google is opening its campus in HYD soon. Watch out!

Nevertheless, there are 2 HYDs as we have 2 Indias (good and the ugly one) :-(
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#315 Posted by Folio on June 4, 2007 4:17:11 am
Chennai,

:-)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#314 Posted by Chennai on June 4, 2007 3:58:50 am
#312 by Folio on June 4, 2007 2:43am PT

Folio, the U Tube on the IT Co`s in Hyd was just great ! I hope our dear neighbours will not make a beeline for Hyd and screw it up.................
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#313 Posted by Folio on June 4, 2007 2:47:46 am
but not desi cows
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#312 Posted by Folio on June 4, 2007 2:43:19 am
#311 by Mantolives on June 4, 2007 1:57am PT

Rear End Hamdani,

:-))


Bulleya,

Bangalore as a city is more of hype. The only thing I like abt Bangalore is its climate.

The cows that roam the roads and streets are Jersey cows (an imported variety; I never know why there are only Jersey cows but now desi cows on the streets of Bangalore).

Even John Keryy carried away by the name of Bangalore and spoke something abt the American cities mathcing Banglore in connectivity (sic). Lol.

The next city by fame is Hyderabad. Ppl can see the diff btw hype and another dimension of typical Indian chaos there.

These Augean stables must be cleared sooner than later.

The Good One:


The Bad one: Jaywalking is the common malaise in India. This video was watched by lakhs of ppl by now. Dont get scared. That`s common in India.





reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#311 Posted by MantoLives on June 4, 2007 1:57:11 am
Re: # 42

Sadly one cannot appreciate your as usual demented tone. Thanks for appreciating.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#310 Posted by majumdar on June 4, 2007 12:58:11 am
HP sain,

(I have heard is that Mush baba will be gone in early July. )

We have been hearing that since Oct 12,1999. The truth is Mush isn`t going anywhere, I think he is going to last longer than Zia or Ayub.

Regards
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#309 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 12:36:28 am
The ultimate Mulla-Military Ittehad:




The people who have been hoping/believing Jamia Hafsa is a `drama` enacted by musharraf for whatever reasons should now stand suitably corrected.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#308 Posted by philosopher on June 4, 2007 12:30:14 am
Re: # 305zeemax

[My sincere condolences. May the dear departed soul rest in eternal peace.]




zee.thanx mate.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#307 Posted by philosopher on June 4, 2007 12:30:13 am
Re: # 305zeemax

[My sincere condolences. May the dear departed soul rest in eternal peace.]




zee.thanx mate.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#306 Posted by HP on June 4, 2007 12:05:19 am
Echo,

Btw, the sina ba sina story I have heard is that Mush baba will be gone in early July. Provincial governments may go right after the budget. NWFP followed by Sindh.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#305 Posted by zeemax on June 4, 2007 12:03:07 am
philosopher,

My sincere condolences. May the dear departed soul rest in eternal peace.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#304 Posted by HP on June 4, 2007 12:02:29 am
Echo,

Why is it necessary for the US presidential hopefuls to say what you want them to say? None of them is so idiot to publicly call for mush`s dismissal. Saying that Mush should be supported is not an endorsement of Mush.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#303 Posted by echoboom on June 3, 2007 10:57:22 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#302 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 10:42:42 pm
#294 by Urstruly on June 3, 2007 10:02pm PT


Interestingly enough, every US economist whines that there is trade dificit viz a viz China, however, they do not connect these dots with those that US borrows the same amount of money on monthly basis


it`s called symbiosis, a concept hard to understand for people for whom 72 virgins is the ultimate goal...

The US exports paper to china(and india) and china(and india) export real goods to the US...perfect balance...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#301 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 10:39:57 pm
btw comrade masadi, I see you`re strangely silent on #292..

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#300 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 10:37:59 pm
#298 by masadi on June 3, 2007 10:27pm PT


Tell me that India has no poverty


has anyone claimed that? OTOH, the facts clearly indicate that poverty is on the decline as India integrates with the global economy...you do understand the concept of the word decline, don`t you? It`s like what happened to the standards of the paki peon factory when they hired you...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#299 Posted by masadi on June 3, 2007 10:32:06 pm
Urstruly writes <<< This seems like a very interesting point. Could you please further elaborate on this. As a layman I do understand that in an equation between US and any other country the net flow of wealth is always directed towards US >>>

There are quite comprehensive trade reports with REAL data, unlike Hamid`s BS, published by Oxfam. Check the section of their publications, they are available for free to download...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#298 Posted by masadi on June 3, 2007 10:27:33 pm
Hamid writes <<< ...... i don`t have the time to educate a fool like you but tata steel, reliance industries and bharat forge are not american companies.... >>>

Neither are they products of Indian integration into the US dominated economy, nor are they predominantly responsible for the increase in Indian exports to the US. If they are please provide your sources. The fact remains that even though some ``ghetto lords`` might get rich fleecing their nation, the vast majority of Indians, over 86% by conservative (and the World Bank is quite conservative in its estimates) languish in poverty. You and your idiot friend Arjun cannot counter the facts so you respond with sloganeering and asking me to read this and check that, come on fools, counter the facts. Tell me that India has no poverty, that its rise in GDP is concomitantly (didn`t use the word correlation because your MIT graduate doesn`t know how to spell it leave alone understanding what it means) reducing poverty in leaps and bounds. IT is NOT, the facts speak for themselves, and you, vile fool are idiotic to believe otherwise...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#297 Posted by Urstruly on June 3, 2007 10:22:32 pm

IS ISLAMIC POLITY POSSIBLE WITH DEMOCRACY (2nd Part)

by Quaid-e-Tehrik-Nizam-e-Mustafa, Mohtaram Abdul-Rashid Ghazi Sahib.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#296 Posted by Urstruly on June 3, 2007 10:13:57 pm

SHARIAH OR SHAHADAT (Martyrdom)

Students of Jamiah Hafsa protesting



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#295 Posted by bulleya on June 3, 2007 10:05:23 pm
hamidm mian:# ``the us trade deficit with india was over $10B ............. on top of that us companies like ibm, hp, gm and ge have hired tens of thousands of indian professionals at high salaries that continue to grow at an alarming rate (alarming for employers and customers)``

....This is true........

`` ........... the indian middle class continues to grow``

This is also true.......

``......and soon there will be a starbucks on every corner in bangalore....``

This is definitely not true.........As I told you earlier, Bangalore still has a long way to go to catch up with Islamabad.........In fact, it has a ways to go to catch up with Lahore.......Forget about any other city.......I am not sure why, since the first two factors would mean that the third should be true, but for some strange reason, it isn`t true..........Bangalore is, basically, a very large Rawalpindi..........with one corner, which looks (somewhat) like Silicon Valley........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#294 Posted by Urstruly on June 3, 2007 10:02:35 pm

#277 Masadi

``...recognize the trick of the US companies whose items, manufactured abroad but sent back home are shown as ``imports``, thus all the relocated manufacturing concerns of the US contribute to the fictional so-called ``trade deficit`` with the poor nation...


This seems like a very interesting point. Could you please further elaborate on this. As a layman I do understand that in an equation between US and any other country the net flow of wealth is always directed towards US. It has always been the case since the time US replaced the previous colonial powers after Atlantic Charter.

In the past, before the collapse of Soviet Union, the equation was easier to undertand when the modus operandi was the politics of `aid`. Suppose a third world country has a GDP of $1, US would offer that country to sell a capital good item fo $3 whose actual selling price should be $1. Now the 3rd world country can`t buy it but needs it to improve its manufacturing base; so it borrows $2 from US and buys that $3 item. So US sold the item for $1 (as it should have) but in the process will benefit from the interest on $2 plus the actual amount for many years to come. So the third world country will borrow more to pay the back debts.

This equation was easier to understand. But this ``trade deficit`` scam is a new one and I want to understand it. Interestingly enough, every US economist whines that there is trade dificit viz a viz China, however, they do not connect these dots with those that US borrows the same amount of money on monthly basis from China as much there the trade dificit is. God what a scam.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#293 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 9:54:21 pm
the big dog wants mushy to be around but any other pliant dictator willing to bomb the tribals and hand over pakis of the jihadi persuasion will do...

As TV Coverage Feeds Protests, Musharraf Reacts

By Griff Witte
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, June 4, 2007; Page A01

HARIPUR, Pakistan -- Every day, Taj Mohammed Abbasi wheels his cart through dusty streets, selling the oranges, guavas and litchis that are the pride of this rural outpost in the shadow of the Himalayan foothills.

But what he`s seen recently on television motivated him this weekend to take to the streets for a different reason: to join a movement with the audacious goal of ousting the military-led government and restoring democracy to Pakistan.

``Watching television, I have become very angry,`` said Abbasi, 33, swatting flies from his cart. ``I am not a political person. I have not been to a lot of rallies. But this time, definitely, I am going.``

Pakistan might be in the midst of its first televised revolution. For nearly three months, a handful of fledgling independent stations have been broadcasting minute-by-minute coverage of what at first seemed a relatively obscure issue: the suspension of Pakistan`s chief judge by the president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf.

Since then, Pakistanis nationwide have been transfixed by live coverage of police beating lawyers, pro-Musharraf groups firing assault rifles at demonstrators and the chief justice speaking to ever-larger and more boisterous audiences about the dangers of autocratic rule.

As the cameras have rolled, opposition to Musharraf has surged, and he is considered more vulnerable now than at any time in his eight years in office. Even in rural areas where poverty is high, residents have gathered in hotels and barbershops around the few television sets available and watched the brewing crisis play out live.

Here in Haripur -- an hour`s drive north of the capital, Islamabad, but a world away from its modern conveniences -- residents came out by the thousands on Saturday to demand that Musharraf step aside and allow elections to restore civilian rule.

Stung by the criticism, Musharraf has reacted by cracking down on what had been the government`s signature defense against charges of authoritarianism: the independent television news networks.

The country`s half-dozen networks all sprung up under his watch, and Musharraf has repeatedly bragged to the world about his efforts to free Pakistani television from state control and censorship for the first time in the country`s history. But with his government teetering, Musharraf, a key U.S. ally, is threatening the networks` very existence.

``He allowed the genie out of the bottle. But he didn`t realize how big it could become. Now he`s trying to put it back,`` said Talat Hussain, director of news and current affairs for one of the channels, Aaj Television.


Aaj, along with others, has come under intense pressure in recent days to pull programming off the air and to cancel live coverage of opposition rallies. Aaj has continued to broadcast, but its transmission is being blocked throughout much of the country.

``I have no illusions about it,`` Hussain said. ``They`re going to shut us down.``

Ayaz Amir, a political commentator who hosts a call-in program on rival channel ARY Oneworld, said his show was canceled this past week because of government pressure. ``I`ve been branded as a person who`s not favorably disposed to the government,`` he said.

Government officials deny they are censoring the news media. They say they are simply enforcing regulations that have been on the books for years but have often been ignored, including a requirement that stations get permission before they broadcast live.

``The independence of the media is something we take pride in,`` said Information Minister Mohammed Ali Durrani. ``We`ll take care of their independence.``

Musharraf has made no secret of his displeasure with the way the controversy over the chief justice has been covered, and his top aides have accused the news media of exploiting the issue for ratings gains.

Last week, Durrani warned journalists against criticizing the army, an institution that has historically been revered in Pakistan but is increasingly attacked for denying the country a chance at civilian rule eight years after a military-led coup elevated Musharraf to power.

Durrani`s remarks came after the independent channels broadcast marathon coverage of an anti-Musharraf rally at which demonstrators chanted slogans such as, ``The generals are traitors`` and ``Save the country -- take Musharraf`s skin off.``

Since that rally, several of the channels have toned down their coverage of the crisis, and there is widespread speculation that they made deals with the government in order to continue broadcasting.

Until recent months, Musharraf had displayed an adeptness at using the media to his advantage -- giving occasional interviews and staging elaborate press events to showcase government accomplishments. The tactics worked: The president enjoyed widespread popularity and was considered virtually invincible.

But the chief justice, Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry, loomed as a potential obstacle because he was expected to rule on cases that could complicate Musharraf`s plans to get himself elected for another five-year term by a lame-duck parliament.

On March 9, Musharraf invited cameramen to a meeting at which he expected Chaudhry to resign under pressure for alleged abuses of office. Instead, Chaudhry refused. The image of the judge moments before he stood up to the uniformed president became the first icon of the controversy.

The next came days later, when police raided Geo television`s office in Islamabad as the station tried to film protesters demonstrating against Chaudhry`s suspension. Tear gas filled the office, and police began beating journalists with batons, but the cameras continued to roll.

Two months later, in Karachi, Aaj`s office came under attack as demonstrators clashed in the streets outside in violence that would ultimately claim more than 40 lives. During six hours of live coverage, Aaj`s anchors repeatedly called for help from the police, to no avail, on a day when government security forces were widely blamed for standing by as the city burned.

A note on the Geo Web site Sunday said: ``The government has blocked the transmission of the Geo News TV channel across the country due to the reasons best known to them. . . .

``The citizens, social and political circles have condemned the ban on transmission of Geo News and they have demanded of the government to immediately lift ban on the transmission of the Geo News and give complete freedom to media in the country,`` it said.

The chief justice and his supporters have used television to their advantage, staging exuberant, day-long parades from one city to the next, earning them hours of continuous coverage.

By contrast, political observers say, the government has tried to use force and intimidation to end the controversy, but has consistently misjudged how its efforts would play on television. As a result, Musharraf`s problems have only intensified.

``What they did not take into account was that the crisis was going live to every bloody Pakistani household,`` said Aamer Ahmed Khan, Pakistan editor of the BBC World Service and a journalist here for more than two decades. ``That is what is making them nervous now.``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#292 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 9:38:01 pm
comrade masadi...what would mills says about your government fooling your people by quoting a figure that has no meaning when the real figure makes them out to look real bad...

we all know you blame abdul`s inability to seek life liberty and the pursuit of a goat/camel on the US, but without US aid, you`d be much much further behind...

Real income growth lags behind Asia

By Yousuf Nazar


Pakistan ranks as the seventh most dangerous country after Iraq, Sudan, Israel, Russia, Nigeria, and Columbia in a 121-nation study by the Economist Intelligence Unit.

While such rankings can be subjective (it may be the 10th or 11th), this is not good news for the government which claims that Pakistan has made unprecedented economic progress during its tenure, recording one of the highest GDP growth rates.

The reality is Pakistan’s per capita GDP growth has been one of the lowest in Asia and below the average of all low-income countries during 1999-2005, when measured in purchasing power parity terms as per the data in the World Bank’s Development Indicators released on April 15, 2007.

The government uses statistics to make claims that cannot stand simple logical test and independent validation. For example, it cites the rise in per capita GDP to $833 in 2006 to support its claim that incomes have doubled in the past 6-7 years and Pakistan will soon become a middle-income country. This is simply misleading. The analysis based on the World Bank’s statistics reveals the true picture of the economic growth in Pakistan relative to the other developing countries.

A widely recognised indicator of the level of prosperity is gross domestic product (GDP) on purchasing power parity (PPP) basis. Since nominal prices of different goods and services vary from country to country, this method of measurement neutralises those nominal differences by comparing what a similar basket of goods and services would cost in different countries. Hence, GDP measured on purchasing power parity basis is considered a more accurate measure of income level and standard of living.

As shown in the graph, Pakistan’s yearly per capita income growth rate was only 4.62 per cent during 1999-2005 and lagged behind not just India’s 7.3 per cent
but also that of similar developing countries with large populations, like Indonesia, Turkey, and the Philippines. These growth rates were derived from GDP per capita data on purchasing power parity basis, as published by the World Bank.

While one-year data should not be used to comment on longer term trends, the above data for the six years belies government’s claims about one of the highest growth rates in the world and confirms the belief that the benefits of growth during the recent years have been somewhat eroded by a persistently high inflation. It is only logical that Pakistan with one of highest inflation rates in the developing world should see a slower growth in the real incomes and living standards when the rest of it is growing at 6-7 per cent with lower inflation averaging about 4-5 per cent compared to Pakistan’s 8-9 per cent. Hence these indicators are unlikely to change materially in one or two years.

Other important World Bank development indicators (2005) also confirm the view that Pakistan remains behind its peers as shown below:

Among this select group, Pakistan has the lowest per capita income in purchasing power terms, the lowest primary school enrolment rate, the highest infant mortality rate, the lowest electricity consumption per capita ( a measure of progress as well as industrialisation), and the highest level of military spending as a per cent of GDP. This is not surprising except for one indicator. Contrary to the widely held view among apologists and supporters of military dictatorships, the real per capita income is not only higher in India but the gap has increased since 1999. In that year, India’s per capita income was 25 per cent higher than Pakistan’s and in 2005 it was 46 per cent higher in purchasing power parity terms.


This is not to say that Pakistan has not made any progress but to put it in a more realistic perspective beyond a narrow set of indicators like GDP growth, bank lending, consumption, foreign investments, etc. Progress in GDP growth terms has been good for most periods when military ruled the country. Yet, after the end of every military regime, the so-called progress turned out to be a bonanza that benefited a few at the expense of critical national development priorities while exacerbating social and regional polarisation.

Assuming the elections will be held as per schedule even though the possibility of the imposition of emergency or even martial law cannot be completely ruled out, it is an appropriate time to judge the performance of this regime in the context of Pakistan history that has revolved around a debilitating cycle of military intervention, half-hearted reforms, failure, demoralisation and breakdown. We now appear to be passing through the disenchantment and demoralisation phase.

Hitherto friendly international media has turned negative and some leading American papers have commented editorially on the gravity of the crisis. The New York Times in its May 23 editorial commented, “A succession of uniformed dictators has misruled Pakistan for more than half of its 60-year history. All have advertised themselves as great friends of Washington, but all have fanned extremism while discrediting America`s reputation among ordinary Pakistanis. There is no security with General Musharraf. The United States belongs on the side of Pakistani democracy.”

Never mind the crisis, the prime minister’s statements about the state of the economy and its prospects appear to be oblivious of worsening macro economic indicators and of growing anxiety in the street and the ‘bazaar’. It is claimed this year’s GDP growth will touch seven per cent, but the credibility of the government’s statistics is seriously questionable.

According to its own data, inflation and exports target are going to be missed, development spending level is way short of target, current account deficit is forecast to reach 5.5-6 per cent of the GDP, and large scale industrial production growth has slowed down to eight per cent compared to 10 per cent in 2006, notwithstanding the fact the Federal Bureau of Statistics has not released quarterly manufacturing data after the first quarter of the current fiscal year as it did in the past.

The stock market continues to rise, charges about manipulation notwithstanding, but the foreign investors’ buying has reduced to a trickle (about $5 million during May) after hitting a peak of $112 million during March 2007 and dropping to $52 million in April. Government borrowings have almost trebled to Rs212 billion during the current fiscal year from Rs73.5 billion last year. The crowding out of the funds to the private sector, accompanied by a more than 100 basis points increase in the average lending rate during the past year, cannot but negatively affect the growth in the next twelve months.

Given the below average growth in rural areas and the concentration of 50 per cent of the urban population in the six largest cities to which bulk of the so-called ‘trickle down” seems to have been taken place; the high food inflation, growing income inequality and ostentatious consumption have only served to alienate the lower and lower middle income groups from the current regime.

According to a public opinion poll conducted by the International Republican Institute (IRI) in March 2007, the economic issues received a much higher intensity of responses than did the non-economic issues with 92 per cent of Pakistanis terming inflation as the most important issue followed by unemployment (85 per cent). The country needs to face more fundamental questions of far reaching implications in the coming months in what is supposed to be an election year. The opposition parties should offer concrete and comprehensive programmes to address core economic issues instead of merely criticising the government for its failures.

With the growing political uncertainty, the economic growth in Pakistan faces greater risks compared to its Asian competitors given its much higher dependency on foreign exchange flows including remittances, investments and aid in that order. The foreign investors’ buying of stocks has slowed, the privatisation programme is in trouble and the property market in Karachi is quiet. The biggest risk is the General will use the spreading disorder and the actions of an increasingly assertive judiciary and lawyers` community as justification to tighten the autocratic grip on power. This may cause the foreign capital flows to dry up, trigger a fall in stock and property markets, exacerbate the current account position, and increase pressure on an over-valued rupee to depreciate.

A beleaguered administration is not in a position to impose new taxes and may find it difficult to contain the budget deficit at the current level. Neither it can afford to make big cuts in the development expenditure and is therefore likely to borrow more or print money. This will keep the upward pressure on interest rates to the detriment of the overall economy.

Even if the General manages to come out of this crisis, it may come at a cost of sharing increased power with the politicians with his authority considerably weakened in the process. In this scenario, although the overall direction of the economic policies is unlikely to change, the uncertainty will not disappear as any alliance between the generals and the ‘liberal’ parties may serve to unite the rest of the opposition and provoke them into challenging the government with even greater force. In any event, a greater period of uncertainty seems to lie ahead and will continue to cast its long shadow on the economy until the current crisis resolves.

yousufnazar@yahoo.com


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#291 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 8:39:22 pm
#283 by aslam644 on June 3, 2007 2:56pm PT


The Pakistani invasion of Europe has started


yeah...they`re really looking forward to that...

Europe`s invisible illegals
Pakistanis are coming to Europe in big numbers; authorities worry they`re bringing terror with them.

Terror Threats?: Would-be illegal Pakistani immigrants at the Canary Islands

By Christopher Dickey
Newsweek International

June 11, 2007 issue - When Italian police arrested 28 illegal Pakistani immigrants in Naples four years ago, authorities claimed they`d broken up a Qaeda cell plotting to attack nearby NATO installations. After all, the raid had turned up a Pakistani newspaper with a picture of a visiting British officer. The cops also found explosives, detonators, maps, false identity papers and dozens of mobile phones. But less than two weeks later, all the suspects had been freed for lack of solid-enough evidence. Prosecutors, who`d had little experience with such new immigrants, just couldn`t make the charges stick.

``They were all innocent,`` says Ejaz Ahmad, the editor of an Urdu-language monthly in Rome who acted as translator at the court hearing. Most of the Pakistanis were street vendors. The explosives were more like fireworks, he says. ``And now,`` he adds, ``all 28 are working in Italy.``

The case may have been a failure for the local cops, but it did establish one thing: just how nervous European authorities are becoming about burgeoning Pakistani populations in places—such as Italy, Spain and France—where there were few or none at all just a few years ago. Now numbering in the hundreds of thousands, many of these Pakistanis have sneaked onto the Continent via Iran, Turkey and the Balkans. They`ve also begun taking a circuitous route across Africa and then by ship to Spain`s Canary Islands or the Mediterranean coasts of Europe. Almost overnight, Pakistani neighborhoods have sprung up in Barcelona and Bologna.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#290 Posted by anil on June 3, 2007 8:14:03 pm
Re: # 274

Massaddi Mian:

``It is not about you or I or your sprinkler guy who is well known to all here thanks to your over generalized (and thus BS) Horatio Alger story about him,....``

Stop taking Religio-Social opium, so that your mind can get out of the hang over to think, and open your eyes. This is not an isolated example, Reliance, Infosys among many in the Sub continent, and many examples are in Silicon Valley.

``...you`d be very selfish to ignore such a system`s effect short term and a fool to think you`re or your kids are immune from the effects of such a disastrous system, long term...``

Follow my above advise and try to read and understand phenomenon of upward mobility. I truly feel for the kids you are corrupting and spoiling their ability to dream. If you are unable to read, accept someone as your guru to teach you.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#289 Posted by anil on June 3, 2007 7:54:24 pm
Re: # 277

Massaddi Mian:

``....neither does he recognize the trick of the US companies whose items, manufactured abroad but sent back home are shown as ``imports``, thus all the relocated manufacturing concerns of the US contribute to the fictional so-called ``trade deficit`` with the poor nation... ``

Is this all you have learned and now teaching in Pakistan? What did they do to deserve, they honestly went their to get education, and parents think their sons and daughters are getting. Pathetic split toungue talker, faking as a teacher.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#288 Posted by philosopher on June 3, 2007 6:55:28 pm
Echoboom #284

Thanx brother for condolences. May Allah bless you for that.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#287 Posted by tahmed32 on June 3, 2007 6:53:07 pm
aslam #283 The good thing is that the average Pakistani is better than those leading the nation or seeking to lead it. So, they contribute in a positive way to wherever they go (with the bus bombers of UK being the exception that proves the rule).

btw, I read your posts on the other board addressed to me on the subject of the UK labor party. That was quite educational for me, and no doubt the labor party deserves credit for helping UK get back on its feet after WWII and also to adjust in a smooth and realistic manner to the end of the British Empire. If only the duds we have as leaders had half the commitment to their nation as the british (or indeed any other country, including India - where a succession of prime ministers has propelled that nation forward while we are still struggling to have these generals get the hell out of the positions of political power they arrogated to themselves through force).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#286 Posted by echoboom on June 3, 2007 6:52:38 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#285 Posted by tahmed32 on June 3, 2007 6:47:01 pm
hamidm: Do not argue with a fool, they say, since people may not be able to tell the difference between the two.

PS: Sorry, I could not resist the above seeing that every post you address to masadi starts with the honorific ``fool`` the same way every post from him starts with something similar.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#284 Posted by echoboom on June 3, 2007 6:06:56 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#283 Posted by aslam644 on June 3, 2007 2:56:59 pm
The Pakistani invasion of Europe has started

In Spain, a Pakistani like Usman Yasar, a 29-year-old construction worker, can settle comfortably into a regional capital like Logroño in La Rioja. He plays cricket and eats curries served from shop windows. He gets help if there`s a problem with his documents at the Asociación Pakistaní de la Rioja. In a region of 300,000 people, Yasar`s countrymen now number more than 6,000. Official statistics place the total number of Pakistanis in Spain at more than 40,000, where 15 years ago their numbers were negligible. And the real count could be much higher. ``We may have the biggest population of Pakistanis in Europe after Great Britain,`` says a top law-enforcement official in Madrid.``
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19000112/site/newsweek/page/2/
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#282 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 2:01:17 pm
Govt blocks transmission of Geo News
Updated at 2250 PST
KARACHI: The government has blocked the transmission of the Geo News TV channel across the country due to the reasons best known to them.

The viewers’ calls flooded the Geo office to ask that why the transmission of Geo News TV channel was suddenly suspended when the famous programme, “Meray Mutabik” was going on.

The calls of the viewers were received from various parts of the country. According to Geo News sources the government has blocked the transmission of the Geo News across the country.

Geo transmission was blocked in various parts of Islamabad, Lahore, Hyderabad, Karachi and other areas.

The citizens, social and political circles have condemned the ban on transmission of Geo News and they have demanded of the government to immediately lift ban on the transmission of the Geo News and give complete freedom to media in the country.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#281 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 1:53:34 pm
#273 by masadi on June 3, 2007 11:10am PT


What indicators do you want to show me fool?


HDI?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#280 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 1:21:48 pm
BTW, masadi....I heard you are back working for the peon factory...

what`s up with that?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#279 Posted by arjun2 on June 3, 2007 1:21:04 pm
#277 by masadi on June 3, 2007 11:52am PT


I am quoting human poverty indicators that describe tens of millions in India, over 86% live below $2 a day, many to most of them below $1 a day


The fact that millions of people have outsourcing related jobs has exactly what to do with the people living in poverty? Did anyone claim that outsourcing had totally wiped out poverty...

Is it your contention that because there are people living on less than 2$/day, India should completely give up it`s outsourcing industry? How does that help the people living on less than 1$/day? Isn`t that actually backwards....I know you`re a commie islamist and don`t believe in trickle down, but the people working in IT create a demand for construction that help people at the lowest levels...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#278 Posted by hamidm2 on June 3, 2007 12:11:57 pm
Re: # 277

masadi,

...... i don`t have the time to educate a fool like you but tata steel, reliance industries and bharat forge are not american companies .......... the last time i sourced precision injection molded parts, more than ten indian companies responded and two of them won a substantial part of the business ............ all this while you are spewing hatred and preaching the virtues of mills to your `students` in pakistan - the poor fools don`t have a chance
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#277 Posted by masadi on June 3, 2007 11:52:32 am
hamid writes <<< you are a pathetic delusional fool !........... >>>>

I am quoting human poverty indicators that describe tens of millions in India, over 86% live below $2 a day, many to most of them below $1 a day, and this idiot quotes figures that benefit only the corporate elite some in India, though most in the West, neither does he recognize the trick of the US companies whose items, manufactured abroad but sent back home are shown as ``imports``, thus all the relocated manufacturing concerns of the US contribute to the fictional so-called ``trade deficit`` with the poor nation... We know who the real fools are, they are the ones who give examples of their gardener and sprinkler guy while ignoring the fate forced on the very vast majority of humankind...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#276 Posted by hamidm2 on June 3, 2007 11:37:10 am
Re: # 273

masadi,

you are a pathetic delusional fool !........... the fact of the matter is that india`s exports to the us grew from 13B in 2003 to over $24B in 2006 including over 3B in engineered products like automotive parts (and that does not include services like engineering, r&d and back office)......... the us trade deficit with india was over $10B ............. on top of that us companies like ibm, hp, gm and ge have hired tens of thousands of indian professionals at high salaries that continue to grow at an alarming rate (alarming for employers and customers) ........... the indian middle class continues to grow and soon there will be a starbucks on every corner in bangalore - remember, starbucks is the gold standard of prosperity and civilization ..........

......... and all this while you are still struggling with manufacturing suicide belts that work .......... i know that you are bitter that you can`t get a real job, but you should have gone to a better school and worked harder instead of feeling sorry for yourself ............... you can do it even now - send for a mail order phd from pacific coastal and i am sure dr ata will give you a job ......... but for god`s sake, stop whining
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#275 Posted by echoboom on June 3, 2007 11:35:05 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#274 Posted by masadi on June 3, 2007 11:28:27 am
hamid writes <<< masadi, ......... i wish i could share your angst which, i can tell, is killing you ...... but i honestly can`t becausse............. been `berry berry good` to me and my sprinkler guy from domeli, district rawalpindi >>>

It is not about you or I or your sprinkler guy who is well known to all here thanks to your over generalized (and thus BS) Horatio Alger story about him, it is about the vast majority of humankind struggling to survive within a system dominated by the US elite, over half live in extreme poverty and the rest live marginal lives, the toys and trinkets and infrastructure you see that so impresses you serves only the very very few among the world`s population, you`d be very selfish to ignore such a system`s effect short term and a fool to think you`re or your kids are immune from the effects of such a disastrous system, long term.

Inspite of the vile sh** coming from your pervertedly sick mind time and again, I feel there might be some atom of decency and conscience based on justice and truth in that dung infested mind of yours that is why I spend time answering your ignorant posts, but I think I might have overestimated the ``good`` in you. Think about it tonight while sipping your favourite beverage...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#273 Posted by masadi on June 3, 2007 11:10:58 am
Chaltahai writes <<< There is no co-relation between US being tied to the ruling insitution or not tied to the ruling institution for a country to fail. How many examples would you like? The fault lies with Pakistanis and pakistanis alone >>>

I see you are boasting about your unnamed institution but unfortunately they didn`t instruct you on the correct spelling of correlation. There is indeed correlation between the position of a country in the global division of labor and its economic, political, and military relationship with the developed world and their level of development. Your unnamed instituion didn`t teach you that as well. Give me ONE example of a country that maintained the same old institutional structure dominated by the US elite, doing its deeds while ignoring its own masses and then developing consistently as a result. There is not a single example. There are examples to the contrary and we have the long history of colonization and now neo-colonization that works through such institutions to keep a country underdeveloped, mass robbery wouldn`t be possible otherwise. We have not only implicit evidence but explicit evidence of leaked plans like Project Camelot, and recently the US barbaric invasion of Iraq using all BS excuses in the book that provide ample evidence on what these higher terrorists plan and want.

Then this idiot writes:

<<< what happened when china and INdia had ``unaligned themselves`` from the ``US dominated economic system``...their citizens hurt the most >>>

There is zero proof that poverty in these regions was worse when they were unaligned, and there is ample evidence that their unalignment saved them during the lost decades of the third world and even more evidence that the ``West`` has become interested in them because they achieved more development in human and industrial terms that makes them more valuable today to those that would rob them. Get your facts straight, illiterate fool rather than teach me or tell me to see HDI indicators or threaten me with ``examples`` which are ``missing``, HDI does not measure or compare poverty among nations, find out what it is composed of before trying to tell me look at it, you have no clue, I know

The percent of the population living below the poverty level is much worse in India than in Pakistan given World Bank data, and given the data COMPOSING the human poverty Index of the UN, except for illiteracy numbers, India is worse off in all other indicators than Pakistan, worse in percent that wont survive till 40, worse in people having no access to clean water, Worse in underweight children. What indicators do you want to show me fool?

You fools, that tout the IT miracle are a disgrace regardless of the institution you attended, in fact your poverty situation is much worse than it was in the unaligned times, you all invent tricks to fool the people regarding nonsense poverty measures but you dont fool me and you dont fool international organizations like the UN.

When a country`s institutions, historically designed by the colonials and maintained in the same fashion by later relations with the neo colonials ensure that the vast majority of the people will live dependent lives in poverty regardless of cell phone showmanship and ring tones and what not, then those poor cannot be blamed for not having enough education to compete with those that are born in privilage, they cannot be expected to have the same psychological outlook towards life that brings objective opportunities, they cannot be blamed because they are victims. And FOOLS like you, who talk big about their educational institutions, and I have beaten in grade point average all of you ``techie types`` during my educational career in the US, all of you, from India, Pakistan, China or whereever, even though I was putting in 60 hour work weeks while going to school full time, then have the audacity to teach me stuff, they don`t themselves know.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#272 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 10:36:48 am
Re: # 267

Dear Aslam644 (My Hero),

Girls gone wild (GGW) in Pakistan, Mashallah. Did u notice the girl smooching adjusting her dupatta to protect her modesty. Goes to show cultural values are subject to conditoning and social pressures whereas human basic instincts are universal.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#271 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 10:30:41 am
Re: # 267

You are my hero.....Jee rukh
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#270 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 3, 2007 9:27:48 am
#269 Aslam,
I was too quick to criticize. Upon further reflection, thanks to the fondness of Paki Punju men for the frontier culture as in PPI (Punjab/Pakhtoon Inc), is it any wonder that young Punju girls have to pleasure themselves? :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#269 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 3, 2007 9:26:24 am
Aslam #267.
Is this the opposite side of the Jamia Hifza hit record? Punju girls behaving badly. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#268 Posted by chaltahai on June 3, 2007 7:14:57 am
Masadi writes: ``Just because you are illiterate does not mean your arguments hold water. If the US was so deeply connected to a ruling institution in a country that was leading it down the drain then you would see similar arguments coming out of the intelligent folk in both India and China. ``

There is no co-relation between US being tied to the ruling insitution or not tied to the ruling institution for a country to fail. How many examples would you like? The fault lies with Pakistanis and pakistanis alone..because they did build any other institutions for a country`s development outside the military. And as far my literacy goes, let me put it to you this way, you wouldn`t even be allowed to mop the floors of the insitutions where I studied. Middling GIT!

``There is a lot of criticism of the US policies coming out of both countries, just because you are naively unaware of it does not mean it doesn`t exist. When both India and China during a much longer priod of history than the current had unaligned themselves from the US dominated economic system, their logic was based on much the same arguments as mine.``

ANd what happened when china and INdia had ``unaligned themselves`` from the ``US dominated economic system``...their citizens hurt the most. Yet since 1978 and 1991, China and INdia respectively have been improving the lot of their citizens by integrating into the very ``US dominated economic system`` you lament. Go across HDI indicators, Financial indicators, Economic indicators..the number simply don`t support your assertion. And just becasue a few retarted khilafaites and latterday Engles think that their alternatives are better, it doesn`t mean that it is so.

``Regarding the world ``chugging along``, which world are you talking about, India? where more people per 100 live below the poverty rate than Pakistan? What kind of development is that? The world is going from bad to worse, the winners are just the select few handpicked Caucasian countries or a couple other US restructured and occupied countries, the rest of the world is in the gutter, some more than others. ``

Yes chugging along, from 1991 on out, India has been making important strides in improving the lot of it`s citizenry. Go check any indicator mentioned above. AS far as comparison to Pakistan..there is no comparison. the rate of growth and improvement in the lives of Indians is happening at a much more rapid pace than in Pakistan.

ANd before you come back with some stupid argument about income distribution and like..go read Jagdish Bhagwati (Kaleidoscope of Growth), the man will win a Nobel in Economics in the next 2 years. WHile you would be dancing about with glee at the thought of your third rate college having accepted your fourth rate ideas per the curiculum.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#267 Posted by aslam644 on June 3, 2007 7:12:32 am
Re: # 266
#266 by hamidm2 on June 3, 2007 6:52am PT
hamidm
for all we know the girls at jamia hafsia might be doing what these are…..astagferullah



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#266 Posted by hamidm2 on June 3, 2007 6:52:10 am
Re: # 265

tahmed,

amen, brother ......... actually i am more concerned about the high incidence of hoof and mouth disease among humans in nwfp (you can see some of it on chowk) ....... i think we should pass this `temporary` marriage law as soon as possible to protect our people and, more importantly, protect our farm animals from human predators ..........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#265 Posted by tahmed32 on June 3, 2007 6:40:36 am
rf/hamidm: whatever you say, the fact is that muslim men mess around no more and no less than any other men. Using the incidence of AIDs as an indicator of promiscuity, its relatively low prevalence in Pakistan relative to most third world countries should mean something.

But dont let me spoil the fun with stupid things like facts.... :-)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#264 Posted by tahmed32 on June 3, 2007 6:36:11 am
zeemax #256: The vast majority of countries in the world today have reasonably free and fair elections. So, I think time is on the side of those who seek the same in Pakistan. Whether it will happen as an immediate result of the current effort led by the CJP and supported by all political parties, or whether this attempt will fail, who knows. If it fails that would be terrible, but one point has already been made - the people of Pakistan have the spirit of a free people, and will not be enslaved forever by those with the biggest guns. It is a question of time before Pakistan comes back on track and joins the free nations of the world, rather than becoming another miserable general-ruled state like Burma.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#263 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 6:35:15 am
Re: # 258

Iran is late to recognize this need, MISYAAR is already practiced in Soodi Arabia and similar arrangements have been sanctified by Jamia Azhar in Egypt for quite sometime. Blame the west for their debauchry, free sex and legalize the practice in your backyard to give an impression of piety, munafiqeen.

Most recently, a Professor from Jamia Al Azhar passed a fatwa regarding Na-Mehram problem allowing BREAST FEEDING for the male colleagues which will make them relatives. Fatwas and blessings such as these expose the male chauvinistic, misogynistic attitudes prevalent throughout the muslim world.

So, its good to be a muslim in the Moslem world, u can have multiple wives of various contracts, overnight, weekly, yearly Or simply take the kaneez in your left hand and boink boink. Now with breast feeding getting legalized for office workers, there will be no crime cause all men will be suckling their co-workers. Only ppl to lose will be the pe-max of this world, the parasites who have been suckling on moslem hate, they wull be out of business.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#262 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 6:23:05 am
Re: # 255

Mr Besharam, Baghairat, Manjhay Ghamay Choora Number 1-Pee-Max (slave of wahabi lucifer), gandee naali ke keeray,

If ppl talk to u doesnt mean u sud forget your neech auqath, always remember your kammee zaath, never forget it otherwise ithnee phetee laganee hai thadee dadee nu yaad ajaiga....sumjhea phudee warka.

Chuttar, even kammee`s have the decency and fortitiude to understand a simple dialogue, u on the other hand are a complete chuttar.

Issue at hand was the misuse of blasphemy laws and their impact on minorities, thus the refeence to shantinagar massacre. Now take it and shove it up your big fat ass with sll the other bhumboos.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#261 Posted by hamidm2 on June 3, 2007 6:19:23 am
Re: # 260

zeemax,

....... personally i prefer the kaneez solution and have always supported the efforts to reconquer india, palestine and andalusia ......... our hindoo, jewish and christian friends might have a problem with it, but then they don`t realize the benefits of dhimmitude inspite of the fact that their women have to serve as comfort girls - ingrates! .......... i am also all for accepting women as gifts from vassal princes, potentates, business partners and clients .........

http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007 06 03 story_3-6-2007_pg7_5
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#260 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 5:50:04 am
#258 by hamidm2,

But seriously hamidm2, let`s discuss it. Even though mutaa is controversial (I don`t know the authenticity of this report. Can you post the link?) but I believe it was practiced till Umar`s time. I don`t think it is practiced today even in Iran though a very small Shia minority sect may support the practice.

My take on this is that after conquests, Kaneezes replaced the need for mutaa, and four marriages replaced kaneezes. However, the need for multiple female sexual partners was recognized and fulfilled at each time and still is in case of upto four marriages (if one can do justice to all). Problem now is no one can afford to do justice to even a single wife let alone 2-3-4, so that results in brothels and/or adultery.

What`s the solution? What do you recommend? Is Mutaa okay because Kaneezes are out too?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#259 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 5:38:21 am
#258 by hamidm2,

................. there is always a silver lining to every cloud - you just have to look for it ..

Good idea. That should cure my jihadiness as well. Jamia Hafsa is full up after your advice so may I send an application to you? What`s your address? I promise to bring ice cream cones ...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#258 Posted by hamidm2 on June 3, 2007 5:21:07 am


.........islam has solutions for all human problems - here is a solution to the hafsa problem :

....... i have long maintained that most of the problems with the religious folks - headaches, muscle pains, mood swings, alcoholism, pedophilia and suicide bombings - stem from extreme sexual frustration and guilt ........... if catholic priests and nuns were allowed to have pseudo-conjugal relations, the church would not have the problem with their bishops molesting the choir boys ............. similarly, if we allowed the girls of hafsa to get into `temporary` marriages with the boys of fareedia and get it on, we could put an end to the mayhem in islamabad ........... after all it is allowed in islam :

TEHRAN: An Iranian cabinet minister said young people should be encouraged to get temporarily married to avoid illicit extramarital sex, newspapers reported on Saturday. “We should expect violations and repercussions if we do not practically respond to young people’s sexual needs,” the Kargozaran daily quoted Interior Minister Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi as saying. “Islam has solutions for all human problems and temporary marriage is a solution to this kind of problem,” the minister was quoted as telling a conference in Iran’s clerical capital of Qom. He said Iran should seek to promote the practice with “boldness” and urged seminary scholars to study the matter and come up with ways to “execute God’s command in society.” afp

................... there is always a silver lining to every cloud - you just have to look for it



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#257 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 4:59:20 am
... contd #256...

.... if there are free and fair elections, Nawaz Sharif will be back in power. There isn`t any doubt about that because only he fits in the multitudinous equation with the ability to reduce polarization between the Islamists and the liberals. Forget about BB. She`s a crook who has no credibility even amongst liberals let alone the Islamists.

Will you accept Nawaz Sharif as PM?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#256 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 4:54:21 am
#254 by tahmed32,

This is a great post. I`m in full agreement.

The crux of the matter is free and fair elections. That my friend, will never be. There`ll only be elections if a controlled democracy is guaranteed, otherwise ther`ll be Martial Law, this time without any disguise or whatever.

So, eventually power has to be snatched through the barrel of the gun for the rule of the people, not by the rigged ballot.

But that`s my opinion. Yours will obviously differ.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#255 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 4:48:14 am
#253 by rf786,

Abey hindoo/christain choorhey, who`s talking about any effing shantinagar here? You alleged something on Hafsa which you can`t defend. Now either answer #247 or forever remain silent !

Tumharey jaisey kanjar bohat dekhey hain ... ultey haath ki maar hain saaley haivaan ...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#254 Posted by tahmed32 on June 3, 2007 4:31:40 am
#252 zeemax: If there are free and fair elections, in a civilized society the legislature (call it parliament, call it majlis, words are not important) has the legitimate authority to formulate laws after proper debate, with suitable protection to certain basic rights of all individuals (along the lines of the US Bill of Rights. And in a civilized society, the Chief Justice (whoever it is at that time) is the legitimate authority to interpret these laws in case there is an issue. And in a civilized society, generals take their orders from a duly elected civilian authority, and not vice versa.

The important thing is the process, and let the pieces fall where they may. If th

The points you note are simply words and can be translated into action in any number of ways - you can call Pakistan an Islamic State and at one extreme interpret it to mean a civilized society (as described above) or it can be interpreted to mean a jahil society (where, e.g., the Chief Justice can be fired by a serving general, or a group of individuals can declare themselves to be spokesmen for God, as the religious leaders try to do in Pakistan). As such, these words dont mean anything by themselves.

The important thing is - that it is the people, through due process of debate, free press, proper elections, and the rule of law decide on these things. Not the guy with the smelliest beard or the biggest guns.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#253 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 4:24:11 am
Re: # 250

Abay Jhakee Budhe,

Obfuscation, deceit, data mining is there anything that u have not mastered? You have done your master (Wahabi Lucifer) great credit by virtue of services rendered.

Read the post again u jackass, it refers to the ransack of Shantinagar, an atrocity committed by fellow muslims in the name of blasphemy. Now do the pee-max....bend over and raise your soiled dhoti for all to see the big A-Hole.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#252 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 4:07:28 am
#251 by tahmed32,

Just a hypothetical question for you.

Whereas:

1) You support the CJ movement for upholding of law, justice and the constitution.

2) You support replacing of the military administration with democratic institutions.

3) You support freedom of expression, assembly, and media.

Now the question is, if tomorrow this same CJ says:

1) ``The preamble of the constitution guarantees Islamic injunctions;

2) The Article 1 describes the State as `Mamlukat -e- Khudad-e-Pakistan;

3) The Article 2 proclaims the State Religion to be Islam;

4) The `Parliament` is just an acronym for `Majils-e-Shura` as desribed in the constitution.


Will you still support him?

:~)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#251 Posted by tahmed32 on June 3, 2007 3:44:10 am
zeemax/rf: aoa, gentlemen.

take a break
and celebrate...

as the judge marches on for justice...

PS: Who knows where all this is leading to. As they say, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. But at least for now, Pakistan is on the right track, and hope the generals behave themselves and God watches out for our beloved nation.

CJ gets rousing welcome: 14-hour drive from Islamabad to Abbottabad



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#250 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 3:18:11 am
Jhootey bismillah hindoo ... tujhe tau mein ghar tak chorr kar aaon ga ... now answer me. Who registered a case on insufficient evidence because as you quote `one complainant wasn`t there and the other denied the accusation`?

No obfuscation, clutching straws, hiding behind inanities, or sobbing for mercy or anything like that.

Just a straight answer :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#249 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 3:12:16 am
#248 by rf786,

Mr radio-frequency ... then who did you mean registered a case with insufficient evidence as a knee-jerk reaction? Obviously you meant the PIMS administration. Isn`t that correct?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#248 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 3:09:00 am
Re: # 247

Abay BUTT Sahib

Where have I said that fir was lodged by JH or anyone for that matter....apnay gunahon kee mafee mang ke shaaid thera bhulla hojai...chuttar
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#247 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 3:03:06 am
#244 by rf786,

....immediate kneejerk reaction to register cases even though there is sufficient evidence to suggest otherwise....

Under what pressure was the PIMS administration to file the criminal complaint themselves without sufficient evidence or did they do it as a knee jerk reaction? It means you are accusing the management of PIMS and not the Hafsa girls. That is good news.

I mean, to clarify, the FIR was lodged by the Deputy Administrator of PIMS, and not by the Jamia Hafsa girls so your argument has just bitten you in the butt, Sir.

:~)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#246 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 2:49:05 am
#242 by Folio,

From above it`s clear that what u `preach` here is a big BS

Imam-e-Kaaba Shaikh Abdur Rehman al-Sudais is a sarkari Maulvi appointed by the Saudi kings. He is no religious authority. It is in fact quite funny that the `enlightened` government has invited him and taking him all over the place, making him issue statements towards `moderation`, when the same government was inviting people from all over to participate in mixed marathons (not that I have anything against those) and sending the female sports minister for para jumps in Paris (not that I`m against that either) just yesterday.

The Imam`s visit is solely to convince people that Jamia Hafsa is wrong according to Sharia, which is false. Imam Ka`aba knows very well what`s going on in his own country, but issuing `gol mol` edicts in Pakistan to bail out the government groveling at his feet and which gave him the `state guest` status after arriving in Pakistan on a private visit on the invitation of just the Punjab government, but only after he had issued a few such statements.

He`s just being nice to his hosts at their request. That`s all. Few will be fooled by that.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#245 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 2:45:26 am
What happened 10 years ago South of Khanewal cannot be forgotten, an act of religious persecution where the victim has never been compensated or given justice:

Press Release 12 February 1997

Church Burned As Violence Flares Again In Pakistan

Two Christian villages have been attacked and churches burned by a hostile Muslim mob in a series of violent incidents on Thursday 6 February.

Jubilee Campaign were given first hand reports of the situation from a local Pakistani church leader who asked not to be named for security reasons.

The violence erupted after a mosque in Khanewal - about 200 miles south of Lahore - broadcast that pages had been torn out from the Koran and blasphemous words had been scribbled on the religious text.

Local Muslims marched on two Christian villages, Shanti Nagar and Bhootabad, threatening villagers, however the police dispersed the crowd peacefully. The mob returned the following day and, this time, police were unable to stop the violence.

* About 1500 Christian homes were burned. This comprises of 60-80% of homes in the area.

* Three churches were raided. In Khanewal, a Roman Catholic Church and an ARB (American Reformed Presbyterian) Church of Pakistan were burned and severely damaged; in Shanti Nagar, a Salvation Army Church was attacked.

* Christian facilities including a hospital, a hostel, and a dispensary (run by the Salvation Army) were also attacked.

* Approximately 100 Christians were hospitalised.

* Two Muslims were killed when police fired on the mob.

News reports claimed that the military had cordoned off both villages and imposed a curfew which was still in force more than twenty four hours after the incident
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#244 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 2:39:04 am
Re: # 243

Other side of the story is always nonsense to those who wish to push their agenda, thats why we have episodes like the ransacking of Shantinagar.

Word blasphemy for any minority in Pakistan means persecution and death, state has also failed to defend their citizens thus the immediate kneejerk reaction to register cases even though there is sufficient evidence to suggest otherwise.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#243 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 2:24:14 am
#241 by rf786,

Arrey bhai if one complainant was not present and the other denied, then how come the PIMS administration itself lodged the criminal report ?????????

I didn`t miss that but it is obviously nonsense and didn`t comment.

Think .... and deduce ... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#242 Posted by Folio on June 3, 2007 2:15:15 am


For Zeemax:

1. Imam-e-Kaaba Shaikh Abdur Rehman al-Sudais has ardently appealed to the Lal Masjid administration to give up the path it has adopted for the past few months

2. He said Islam does not allow violence, terrorism and use of force. The religion teaches mutual compassion and emphasises on love and affection.

3. Quoting the Holy Prophet (PBUH), Al-Sudais said that the ``air of heaven would not touch anybody who would kill a non-Muslim covered by an agreement.``

4. ``No individual can or has the right to declare and wage Jihad.``

5. When the Holy Prophet (PBUH) did not have power in Makkah, he acted differently and when he had power in Madina, he proceeded in a different fashion.``

(http://thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=8279)

From above it`s clear that what u `preach` here is a big BS.


Kaalachakra,

I hope u stop patronising Zeemax, a pseudo namaazi.






Anyone with knwoledge of Pakistan can explain this:

The main photograph on the front page shows the `foremr` CJP with the flags of Pakistan and that of Supreme Court of Pakistan.

Q. Does any ousted CJ had powers to use these powerful symbols of the state of Pakistan when he`s not in power? Was it part of his penchant for `misusing` his powers?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#241 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 2:12:07 am
Re: # 240

{desecrated verses of ‘Bismillah’ and Dua for eating and drinking fixed on the notice board of a classroom....}

This is just one ``alleged`` version, there is another side of the story that u have chosen to ignore for your personal agenda.

``one of the students was not present at that time while the other denied Jamia Hafza students’ claim``

Balance is extremely important in Islam, maybe u missed that perspective in your wahabi teachings.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#240 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 1:25:50 am
#239 by rf786,

1. Who is the desecrator here? Was the Dua written over the cross or the cross made over the dua?

Mr. RadioFrequencyBismillah, do you mean the cross was there first on the classroom notice board and someone wrote Dua over it? Read below what you reproduced:

.....desecrated verses of ‘Bismillah’ and Dua for eating and drinking fixed on the notice board of a classroom....

LoL
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#239 Posted by rf786 on June 3, 2007 12:59:57 am
Re: # 178

Alleged desecration with one student refuting JH claims. Question that needs to be asked:

1. Who is the desecrator here? Was the Dua written over the cross or the cross made over the dua?



Nursing school head, students suspended
By Munawer Azeem

ISLAMABAD, June 2: Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims) administration has suspended the principal and a teacher of a nursing school along with seven students for committing violation of rules and regulations on Friday night, sources told Dawn.

However, Pims Executive Director Dr Fazle Hadi claimed that the administration had suspended five Muslim and Christian students besides the principal and a teacher.

He said an FIR had been lodged with Margalla police station against unidentified people who allegedly desecrated verses of ‘Bismillah’ and Dua for eating and drinking fixed on the notice board of a classroom.

An inquiry into the incident is being conducted by Prof Anwarul Haq, however, the suspension of seven people had been carried out for their alleged violation of rules, he added.

The executive director said the students of Jamia Hafza, who came to the school on Friday, claimed that they were informed about the incident by two Muslims students who asked them to visit the school.

However, one of the students was not present at that time while the other denied Jamia Hafza students’ claim, he added.

On the other hand, the college principal, Stella Lazir, told Dawn that the administration suspended 10 people, including seven Christian students, without having any prove against them about the violation.

She said the inquiry into the incident was still under progress and the move to suspend the students, a teacher and principal was illegal.

She said about 75 per cent of the students were Muslims and there was a strong possibility that ‘outsiders’ were involved in the incident.

The suspended principal said the desecration of holy verses occurred on May 17 during her absence as she was on holiday from May 14 to 23.

The administration and the acting principal, Irshad Begum, overlooked this issue probably because exams were being held in the school at that time, she added.

Ms Lazir said she was informed about the incident on May 27 and the next day she talked to the students about the issue
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#238 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 12:24:02 am
#228 by tahmed32,

...betraying his ignorance of the fundamentals of democracy, the writer betrays his ignorance of the fundamentals of the Quran as well.

Tahmed saheb, he knows perfectly well what he`s talking about, and so do I. However I concede he wouldn`t have a clue about ``tahmedyat``, just as I don`t have a clue about ``ahmedyat`` i.e. without the `t`, which I hope is a pardonable offense :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#237 Posted by zeemax on June 3, 2007 12:17:33 am
#227 by Urstruly,

You beat me to it. I was going to post the same:)

What clear thought. Afreen s`ud Afreen. I particularly enjoyed Ghazi`s definition of ``By the people, of the people, for the people`` as `` enslaving people to other people with the people`s consent``; and that Islam quite on the contrary brings people out of slavery of another man into slavery of Allah alone.

I had earlier tried to explain this concept by saying ``Fear of Allah`` actually does not mean quivering in Allah`s fear and trying to obtain His pleasure, but in fact ``Fear of no Man`` including the `Haqim-e-Waqt`.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#236 Posted by arjun2 on June 2, 2007 10:16:59 pm
hey manto..tell us more about the free paki media now...

ha ha...


Channels barred from airing shows on CJ issue



By Amir Wasim


ISLAMABAD, June 2: Enraged by media coverage of the ongoing judicial crisis, the government on Saturday stopped satellite TV channels from telecasting programmes, including live talk shows and discussions, on the issue of the presidential reference against Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry.

The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority sent a carefully-drafted letter to the managements of the private TV channels to inform them of the decision to ban TV coverage of the events related to the chief justice.

Interestingly, Pemra also issued a press release later in the afternoon regarding the award of licence to DawnNews TV in which it claimed that no ban had been imposed on live coverage of programmes.

The Pemra letter to the TV channels, a copy of which is available with Dawn, states: “No programme shall be aired which (i) is likely to encourage and incite violence or contains anything against maintenance of law and order or which promotes anti-national and anti-state attitude; (ii) contains anything which amounts to contempt of court; (iii) contains aspersions against the judiciary and integrity of the armed forces of Pakistan; (iv) maligns or slander any individual in person or certain groups, segments of social, public and moral life of the country; and is against basic cultural values, morality and good manner.”

“You are, therefore, advised to refrain/desist from relaying programmes which deviate (from) Pemra laws and Code of Conduct. Non-implementation of the directives in this respect shall invoke legal action under Pemra Ordinance 2002 and rules/regulations made there under,” says the letter carrying the signature of Pemra director-general (enforcement) Rana Altaf Majid.

In the letter, Pemra accuses TV channels of constantly violating the code of conduct. It “regrets” that some broadcasters are still engaged in showing “gruesome/gory scenes of mutilated bodies of tragic incidents of terrorism creating fear and unrest in the society which serves the purposes of the terrorists”.

It says Pemra has always believed in self-regulation and self-correction. The authority, it says, expects maturity and a sense of responsibility from the broadcasters.

“In clear disregard of the orders of the Supreme Court of Pakistan and Pemra laws and code of conduct, the broadcasters are running live talk shows and discussions on the chief justice’s reference which is sub judice.”

With apparent reference to the live telecast of the addresses of the chief justice to various bars and with particular reference to the seminar of the Supreme Court Bar Association on May 26, the letter says: “In the recent past, some channels telecast live speeches which blatantly violated Pemra’s code of conduct.”

It is worth mentioning that several federal and state ministers have also been participating in the talk shows on the CJ issue, but the Pemra letter has no mention about participants of the programmes.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#235 Posted by ahmedmadani on June 2, 2007 9:39:42 pm
Prof. Hoodbhoy is not doing his work of teaching atom bomb science. But he is playing politics openly and giving comfort to recist and antiMQM criminals. Can prof be disciplined for taking part in politics and defaming university reputaion instead of getting inviolved in higher studies about atomic science. President as a chancellor of univ should fire prof for not doing job and taking part in politics. If he does not teach lesson then he is too generous. Hope he does not make deal with corruption empress of pakistan BB to get elected. He will get elected and will fire stupid and ungrateful elected officials.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#234 Posted by ahmedmadani on June 2, 2007 9:19:09 pm
This prof. is danger to pakistan by openly writing against army and govt of pakistan and inciting violence and preaching hate politics
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#233 Posted by echoboom on June 2, 2007 9:16:28 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#232 Posted by hamidm2 on June 2, 2007 8:59:18 pm


urstruly,

..... i just finished watching the pistons get their butts whupped by the cavaliers and now i hear that you have been calling me a musalli ......... this is depressing .......but you should be ashamed of making fun of musallis, kumars, chumars and other lower caste people because, more than likely your grandpa ramchandar, like my grandpa gopinath, belonged to one of these clans ....... a brahmin or any other upper class hindoo with a pot to piss in had no need or desire to convert to an alien religion ........... and just because he converted and took on the first name of a bedouin prophet, does not make you a syed or a qureshi - just try migrating to mecca .........

............ and please stop pasting all this urdu shurdu stuff on this english medium board like an ordinary urdu medium scallywag .......... it is beneath you ...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#231 Posted by teshah on June 2, 2007 8:47:29 pm
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#230 Posted by Urstruly on June 2, 2007 8:22:23 pm

Pervez Hoodbhoy`s fellow member of faculty is freed from jail:

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#229 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 8:16:36 pm
further to #228 and of course in betraying his ignorance of the fundamentals of democracy, the writer betrays his ignorance of the fundamentals of the Quran as well.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#228 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 8:09:17 pm
#227 urstruly: The writer is totally ignorant of what democracy means. Democracy means having an orderly and fair means for appointing national leaders. Democracy means assuming all individuals are equal before God.

The writer is oblivious to these fundamentals of democracy. The fact that he writes in urdu merely means that he protects himself from being the laughing stock of the rest of the world.

You should have quit while you were ahead in #225.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#227 Posted by Urstruly on June 2, 2007 7:51:12 pm

IS IT POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH AN ISLAMIC POLITY THROUGH DEMOCRACY?

From the critical pen of Quaid-e-Tehrik-e-Nizan-e-Mustafa, Right Honorable Abdul Rashid Ghazi Sahib


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#226 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 7:42:44 pm
The Cheif Justice of Pakistan - A true Pakistani patriot!! May Allah bless him and protect this brave man. Amen.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#225 Posted by Urstruly on June 2, 2007 7:36:24 pm
First I only liked this guy and now I am beginning to respect him. Gosh! it has been decades that I have felt respect for a public official or a politician. I did respect Nawabzada Nasrullah Khan though.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#224 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 7:35:55 pm
Hope everyone is having fun exchanging insults. :-)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#223 Posted by Urstruly on June 2, 2007 7:32:10 pm
Re: # 222

Number 2 is in fact pronounced as ``Number dou`` which is a street slang in punjab; which refers to a chokra, a nadda, or a lounda - lounda as in `attar ka lounda` for whom Ghalib Sahib turned into a tipsey, got STDed and got sick.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#222 Posted by philosopher on June 2, 2007 7:23:04 pm
Re: # 221urstruly

LOL:what does number 2 stand for if he is the chief of mussaliis?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#221 Posted by Urstruly on June 2, 2007 7:01:50 pm

Hamidm stands for Meeda Mussalli; he himself told me on another board. As a matter of fact he takes pride in being the chief mussalli of Chowk.

Once when I was a student I used to share an appartment with other classmates and our neighbor was the General Manager Facilities in the PIA. We used to call him ``chooRiaN da incharge``. That was our way of getting even with him for being mean to us. Our crime was only that we would try to get jiggy with his daughter who happened to be made of milk and honey.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#220 Posted by philosopher on June 2, 2007 5:43:53 pm
Re: # 219hamid Mascot [of apostates]

I have been trying to figure out that what excatly the letter ``M`` stand for in your ID.?
the number 2 is quite obvious one. will u please enlighten(moderatly) me?

And man, i dont curse people who disagree with me.but i cannot respect those people who dont know how to disagree gracefully.The Glorious Quran says;
``Argue with them in good manners``so you first learn to behave like a gentleman when you discuss matters which are sensitive to muslims` sentimesnts.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#219 Posted by hamidm2 on June 2, 2007 5:23:53 pm
Re: # 217

falsefee,

........ i really resent you calling me `murdood` - it is not very nice to curse people just because they disagree with your theology .......... and i really don`t understand why you have to threaten to kill people who disagree with you - it reflects a deep-rooted insecurity ..........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#218 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 4:14:35 pm
#217 by philosopher,

Forceful conversions of non-Muslims is not allowed. Forceful conversion or elimination of proselytizing apostates or Munafiqs or those within Muslims with hostile intentions against Muslims is not only allowed but ordained. Non-Muslim enemies come later. These come first.

Cheers. We`ll continue tomorrow ....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#217 Posted by philosopher on June 2, 2007 4:08:45 pm
Re: # 214zee maximumist

I can post Abu Bakr`s message sent to the apostates from Zul Qissa again but I`ve posted it so many times that it`s getting boring]




I am not discussing the issue of apostacy or the punishment for apostate, like Hamid murdood, here.i am taliking about the ``forcefull conversion`` of NON Muslims to islam.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#216 Posted by arjun2 on June 2, 2007 4:07:02 pm
#213 by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:57pm PT


And the penalty for waging war and in battle even against other people, let alone Allah, is death


So you`re going to enforce the death penalty if I blaspheme the pbuh dude?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#215 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 4:04:56 pm
I gotta run. Thanks for the discussion :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#214 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 4:03:59 pm
#212 by philosopher,

Amaan yaar Philosopher ... now you bring up ``la ikrah fid deen`` LoL.

I can post Abu Bakr`s message sent to the apostates from Zul Qissa again but I`ve posted it so many times that it`s getting boring.

There is no ``la ikrah fid deen`` in Islam in times of conflict. Only in times of dominance which is Islam`s natural state and where it stands most of the time :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#213 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:57:23 pm
#210 by kaalchakra,

Yes it is waging war. And the penalty for waging war and in battle even against other people, let alone Allah, is death. I don`t see how people don`t understand such a simple thing.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#212 Posted by philosopher on June 2, 2007 3:57:13 pm
Re: # 211zeemax

so if you if we accpet the ``latter``category, the one you subscribe to, as the true spirit of that particular Quranic injunction it would than be[and there is no reason that it wont,provided we keep making that kinda analogies] applicable to verse``la ikrah fid deen``(there is no compulsion in religion) as wel, and we may very well use it to justify the forcefull conversion to islam of non-muslims.

would you recommend that as well?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#211 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:49:36 pm
#209 by philosopher,

Philosopher Bhai ... there`s actually no punishment for blasphemy in the Qura`an. Nil. I don`t know where you get that ``light`` kinda punishment like one or two years sentence. from. All it says is that Allah will deal with them as he deems fit in a most excruciating manner. That is interpreted by some as let Allah deal with them on the judgment day and let them go in the lifetime. While others interpret it to mean that Allah has ordained Muslims to carry out His will right here during lifetime, so the punishment of Allah is applicable to be carried out in jurisprudence.

I subscribe to the latter category :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#210 Posted by KaalChakra on June 2, 2007 3:44:31 pm
zee # 208

Don`t know...zee. Think of another situation, not impossible to imagine.

Tomorrow, some Hindus - in whatever locality of Pakistan where they are a majority - get together, and publicly demolish a mosque. Then build atop the mosque`s ruins a temple honoring goddess durga.

Will that still not be waging war against Allah and causing mischief in Muslim land?

We are essentially pronouning the Quran useless in Muslim land. Seems very close to Islamophobia to me.... :(



# 209 philosopher

Sure, but if people get away lightly with fitna, any Islamic society will be a shambles very soon....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#209 Posted by philosopher on June 2, 2007 3:41:03 pm
Re: # 206kaal

you see, even if it is a form of``mischief in the land`` Quran doest recommend death penality,as a minimum punishment, for that.

Quran categorically states that if they repent they must be forgiven.they can be given a ``light`` kinda punishment like one or two years sentence.
But if they continue to do so only than can they be treated the way zeemax is recommending.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#208 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:36:01 pm
#206 by kaalchakra,

Philosopher says:

Do you think painting Quranic verse on the cross is ``fassad fil arz``even if it is do you think the culprit deserves the maximum punishment?

If blasphemy isn`t ``Fitna`` and ``fassad fil arz`` against Allah`s land and system, I don`t know what else is. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#207 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 2, 2007 3:35:14 pm
#170 {``...In a bid to become more Punju-friendly, Altaph Bhai announced another change to MQMs name. He decreed that MQM (Muttahida Qaumi Movement) will now be called MKM (Muttahida Komi Movement).``}

Moti Maan Bezamir announced that she does not have to prove her pro-Punju orientation. The very name of PPP is inherently all Pee and represents Punjaibis better than any other acronym. :))
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#206 Posted by KaalChakra on June 2, 2007 3:29:24 pm
Patience, Zee, Patience! :)

Now, I am not a Muslim, but were I one, I wouldn`t know what would be more of waging war against Allah and His Messenger, and causing mischief in Muslim land than a bunch of Christians/Hindus openly insulting the Quran by painting a Christian Cross or Hindu Elephant god over Quranic verses in (semi) public places!

For others it may be people committing theft or usury, but then that is their issue.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#205 Posted by arjun2 on June 2, 2007 3:28:56 pm
#184 by zeemax on June 2, 2007 1:02pm PT


You do understand that some of us may regard the Jamia Hafsa girls as our own respected sisters.


They`re not really your sisters unless you are boinking them....so, are you?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#204 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:27:29 pm
#203 by arjun2,

Usually I don`t stoop to responding to you, but this seems a fair question.

I don`t wish Peace upon my revered figures exclusively over and above others as a suffix because they were as much or less humans than anyone else, even you. I wish Peace upon everyone.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#203 Posted by arjun2 on June 2, 2007 3:20:19 pm
#202 by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:14pm PT


entire wide spectrum of things Muhammad did

Killing apostates and blasphemers without mercy is one of them.


You didn`t says PBUH when using mo`s name...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#202 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:14:37 pm
#201 by philosopher,

No. I`ll accept any hadees only if it is in keeping with the entire wide spectrum of things Muhammad did, as well as in keeping with the overall theme (message if you like) of Qura`an. Both taken together and none mutually exclusive.

Killing apostates and blasphemers without mercy is one of them.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#201 Posted by philosopher on June 2, 2007 3:05:16 pm
Re: # 200zeemax

so you can accpet a Hadith as valid and authentic even if it contradits the Quranic injunction?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#200 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:02:26 pm
#198 by philosopher,

My point was that all which I listed are derived from Muhammad`s life. Everything is not in the Qura`an. Islam is Qura`an PLUS Muhammad`s life from the outset. I add the closest Companions in that equation as well.

(P.S. The 32:5 that you quoted, I wonder why everyone remembers the entire paragraph about ``... if any one slew a person ... it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people.`` and most conveniently forgets (as I pointed out to masadi as well to no response) the context in the end which says ``... yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land. ) But as a rule, I do not discuss Qura`anic verses. Take them for what you want.)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#199 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 2:53:26 pm
#196 by hamidm2,

There`re no ice cream cones in Jamia Hafsa .. only on the way back from proms in the backseat of cars in Michigan :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#198 Posted by philosopher on June 2, 2007 2:53:05 pm
Re: # 195zeemax
Can you tell me where in Qura`an are how many Rikaats per prayer at different timings? Once you answer me (or anyone else), I`ll tell you where the punishment of death (questions asked later) comes from :~)]






well zee,with all due respect,i have never expected you to be so much irrartional.what kind of analogy is this?rakaat of namaaz is entirly a different issue.you cannot mix up these things.Quran is absolutly clear on the issue of death penality that it can be given for murder or ``fasaad fil arz``[mischief in the land``]but in the latter case death penalty is the maximum punishment not the minimum.let me quote Quran here;

[32:On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.

[33. The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;

34. Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful(5:32...34)]

Do you think painting Quranic verse on the cross is ``fassad fil arz``even if it is do you think the culpuprit deserves the maximum punishment?

your comments please.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#197 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 2:51:11 pm
contd....#195 ....

.... to further elaborate, most Muslims pray and many pray exactly 5 times or even six times (including Tahajjud) a day. Eid, funerals, taraveeh, and nafal are extra. All prayers have different timings, different number of `rakaats`, and some like Eid and funerals have different methods of performing Namaz as well.

Where did all these come from?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#196 Posted by hamidm2 on June 2, 2007 2:45:51 pm
Re: # 192

krishna,

......... what do you have against blondes !?......... it would be a fate worse than death for any woman not educated at the jamia hafsa .....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#195 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 2:42:43 pm
#194 by philosopher,

You know, you guys are so out of touch with Islam that it is unbelievable. You particularly are supposed to have some knowledge about it.

You ask me to quote Qura`an or Sharia in defence of my argument.

Can you tell me where in Qura`an are how many Rikaats per prayer at different timings? Once you answer me (or anyone else), I`ll tell you where the punishment of death (questions asked later) comes from :~)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#194 Posted by philosopher on June 2, 2007 2:23:48 pm
Re: # 188zeemax
Painting a cross over Quranic verses is blasphemy and even killing for it is justified in Islam. I think the nurses were let off lightly]





I agree with himid mardood on this. you are a bit harsh on this issue. can u point me a single Quranic injunction in support of this claim?or even if u are deriving it from a certain principle of islamic jurisprudence will u please give me the reference.?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#193 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 2:21:07 pm
#191 by hamidm2,

I know where to stick that cross too ... but it`ll be closer to your home ... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#192 Posted by krishna_abcd on June 2, 2007 2:20:54 pm

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Masadi that a good blow job from a blonde won`t cure.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#191 Posted by hamidm2 on June 2, 2007 2:12:22 pm


zeemax,

``Painting a cross over Quranic verses is blasphemy and even killing for it is justified in Islam. `` ............ may i be so bold as to tell you where you can stick this islam ? ........... i really don`t give a flip about islam, but people like you are giving us muslims a bad name ..........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#190 Posted by KaalChakra on June 2, 2007 2:12:00 pm
Zee, Folio

These nursing college people must be very well connected socially, even politically. That`s the only explanation for what happened.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#189 Posted by hamidm2 on June 2, 2007 2:05:35 pm
Re: # 176

aslam mian,

........ you have given voice to my worst nightmare ! .......... i will just have to kill myself if one of daughter maries a man with bruised ankles and the mark of the devil on his forehead - i`d rather she marry a horrible hindoo as long as he is not a vegetarian (or a coder) .......... but really, i have no problem with garden variety muslims persay - heck, most of my friends and family are muslims and i consider myself a cultural muslim too - i always take two days off for eid, i love iftaris during ramzan, and unlike most `real` muslims i even make eggnog and put up chistmas lights for eid .......

........ may al-lah save our children from the shadow of the salafist denizens who dwell in the stygian bowels of bradfordistan and brooklyn .......... amen, sum ameen
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#188 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 1:56:10 pm
#186 by Folio,

Ok thanks for realizing your mistake. First, there is no law in Pakistan right now. All law flows from the constitution and once that is practically abrogated, one can pretty much make their own law which practice is now prevalent in about 1/3rd or more of Pakistan. Hafsa girls have chosen to implement the Islamic law and are doing a good job at it on public complaints.

Secondly, blasphemy is a very serious offense in Islam. Ther`re no ifs and buts about it nor any mitigating circumstances. Painting a cross over Quranic verses is blasphemy and even killing for it is justified in Islam. I think the nurses were let off lightly.

Rgds.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#187 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 1:38:54 pm
Justice on the March....


Lawyers warn they won`t be cowed; CJP on way to Abbotabad HARIPUR, Pakistan, June 2 (Reuters) Thousands turned out to greet Pakistan`s suspended chief justice Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry as he travelled to a northwestern town Saturday. Chants of “Go Musharraf Go” were raised as Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry passed through towns and villages on his way to address the legal fraternity in Abbottabad. Along the way, Aitzaz Ahsan, the leader of the legal team defending Justice Iftikhar against charges of misconduct, delivered a sharp riposte to a statement of support for President Musharraf issued by the army`s top brass a day earlier. “Our movement cannot be stopped through barrels of guns, or through the threat of tanks and army. We will continue our struggle,” Ahsan said to applause from a crowd of over 3,000 in Haripur town. “The constitution gives the people of Pakistan the right to rule the country. We will no longer allow any army general to rule the country,” Ali Ahmed Kurd, another member of Justice Iftikhar’s legal team, told opposition activists in Taxila. After nine hours of driving for the journey, the convoy of cars carrying Justice Iftikhar and his supporters had still to reach Abbottabad some 60 km north east of Islamabad. Around 15,000 people had come out to cheer the suspended chief justice and shower his vehicle with rose petals. The caravan of cars travelling with Justice Iftikhar began to swell as he approached Abbottabad. (Posted @ 20:26 PST)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#186 Posted by Folio on June 2, 2007 1:26:21 pm
Zeemax,

It`s my mistake that I hurled an abuse (instead of a phrase that`d be critical). I cant win an argument with such a beginning.

OK. I dont approve of the action of the JH babes. There`s an established law enforcing authority to look after such issues. JH is NOT vested with ANY authority, much less an authority to bash others and OCCUPY buildings ILLEGALLY.

Again, what`s the ahem of a verse stickered on a water cooler?

It was proved again and agin that the blashphemy laws in Pakistan were misused very often.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#185 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 1:15:21 pm
Secondly Folio, this rag you read is a totally biased mud-slinging vehicle of the treachorous Najam Sethi and the proof is right here in this article you quote:

Now pay attention.

The headline reads:

Hafsa students’ attempt to occupy PIMS hostel foiled

While when you read the content, it says:

Minister of State For Minorities Mushtaq Victor and former federal minister J Salik reached PIMS and negotiated with the Jamia Hafsa students. They said there were 40 percent Christian nurses in PIMS and they had never hurt the religious sentiments of other communities.

AND

The Margalla police station has registered a case against unidentified persons under Section 295B of the Blasphemy Act on the complaint of PIMS Deputy Executive Director Dr Amjad.

From the above it is obvious that there were negotiations at the highest level and the PIMS administration itself was forced to lodge a criminal report and the police was forced to register a criminal complaint. Therefore, no occupation of the hostel.

So was really any attempt to occupy PIMS hostel foiled? Or was that the purpose in the first place as you gleefully pronounce ``... Jamia Hajsa babes (read as bitches) tried to OCCUPY another real estate ...``?

Stop being a Muslim hating bigoted liar like your compatriots etc ... Read the story as well as between the lines, and not only start jumping up and down with just the headline which may be sensationalist as media is anyway and particularly that belonging to proven traitors like Najam Sethi.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#184 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 1:02:26 pm
#183 by Folio,

You called Jamia Hafsa girls ``Bitches`` and I can`t even call your mom a christian nurse? Is it a `gaali` for you?

You do understand that some of us may regard the Jamia Hafsa girls as our own respected sisters.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#183 Posted by Folio on June 2, 2007 12:52:15 pm
Zeemax,

I read this newspaper now.

Btw, do u have 2 drag my mom here? No.2 Do u have 2 be from similar background to s`pport the victims of JH babes? When we s`pported Shamim aunty, does that mean that moms of all protestors were prostitutes??

This is an appropriate board to discuss this. U can putforward ur points or else be content with ur poor comment.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#182 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 12:15:52 pm
#181 by aslam644,,

Yes he`s the number one mulla do piaza on Chowk ... I don`t dispute that ...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#181 Posted by aslam644 on June 2, 2007 12:11:20 pm
Re: # 177
zeemax
i don`t regard him as adversary he has friendly banter all the time so i thought i`d try it as well.
he is NO 1 on the chowk for quick wit and humour.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#180 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 12:04:41 pm
But thanks for providing the link ... great news ...!

Jamia Hafsa students said they visited PIMS on the complaint of Muslim nursing students Amna Nuzhat and Nasreen. They said the PIMS administration misbehaved with them when they tried to see the complainants.... Minister of State For Minorities Mushtaq Victor and former federal minister J Salik reached PIMS and negotiated with the Jamia Hafsa students. They said there were 40 percent Christian nurses in PIMS and they had never hurt the religious sentiments of other communities.* Five Christian officials including nursing college principal suspended for alleged desecration of holy Quran * Hostel closed for 15 days.

All because of firm action by just 30 Hafsa Mujahidas .... watch this space :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#179 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 11:56:37 am
#178 by Folio,

Oh didn`t know your mom is a christian nurse at PIMS ... :) Why else would a bharti hindoo be concerned about christain nurses getting kicked out for desecrating Quran in Islamabad?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#178 Posted by Folio on June 2, 2007 11:46:15 am
Jamia Hajsa babes (read as bitches) tried to OCCUPY another real estate in Islamabad?

http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007 06 02 story_2-6-2007_pg1_11
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#177 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 11:21:49 am
#176 by aslam644,

...he thought to himself “ a wahabi for a son in law, well at least it’s not a nigger”.

Haha ... Thanks. A fitting adversary for `potohari2` ... (Thumbs up icon)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#176 Posted by aslam644 on June 2, 2007 11:04:10 am
Power of nightmares part2

Potohari2 was heading home from work glad that the week is over and is looking forward to relaxation at weekend, he is quite pleased with himself. After all, why shouldn’t he be, he had worked hard and risen through the rungs of corporate America,and he’s an area manager for a consultancy firm, has a nice house in an all white suburb with double garage and two SUV’s, he has an adoring wife and two beautiful daughters both at college, yep life was good, it could only happen in America.

It wasn’t all plain sailing though, he had to make some sacrifices along the way as well, he had kept his muslim identity a secret, more so since 9/11,he had changed his name from mahmood to mike, and had made sure his daughters were given anglo-saxon names of sarah and rita. Whenever his neighbours and colleagues asked him about his origins, he had always said he’d migrated from potwar, most white’s didn’t have a clue where potwar was, they all thought it was some place in eastern Europe, or a region in spain. Potohari2 had always celebrated thanks giving day and Christmas with real enthusiasm, come 4th of july he had star and stripes flying from every window in his house, apart from these small sacrifices on the whole he was enjoying every minute of his life in America.

He parked his SUV on the drive of his house and let himself in through the front of his house, he wasn’t prepared for what he saw his daughter Rita in hijab and black abaya, “ hi dad “ rita greeted, drawing her voice as if to whisper, he glanced at her intensely without saying a word, then abruptly turned around towards the kitchen archway and shouted to his wife “ a glass of water and aspirin zeeby “.

His wife came hurriedly with a glass of water and aspirin and said to him, “ you shouldn’t get all worked up about any thing, you know you have high blood pressure, the last thing we need is for you to fall ill, besides it’s Friday you should be getting ready to go to your favourite irish pub “.

He placed the empty glass on the table, and took his coat off, he through it on the sofa and loosened his tie, as he sat on the chair, he looked angrily across to his daughter.

“What’s the meaning of this Rita? “ he asked

“I wanted to tell you for some time daddy but I was afraid, because of your views on Islam I have secretly gotten engaged to abu-sufyan he’s a salafi-muslim.

He’s told me to wear the hijab and abaya because it’s Islamic dress” she answered hesitantly.
“ what is a salafi, is it a new sect of islam” his wife asked curiously.

“ No it isn’t a new sect it’s just a fancy name for wahabis” he said angrily

“ I had such high hopes and dreams for you Rita, I had hoped after your graduation you’d find a good career, a nice WASP young man, marry and settle down” he said to her and sighed.

“ You yourself had told both of our daughters, that they are free to marry whoever they choose,” his wife reminded him.

“ I never in my wildest dreams thought she’d choose a wahabi” he retorted angrily to his wife.

“ I love abu-sufyan with every fibre of my being, he’s tall, dark and handsome, he has full flowing beard like some biblical prophet, he has mihrab on his forehead, which I call his black beauty spot, I’m sure you’ll like him once you meet him daddy”. Rita pleaded.

“ It’s just probably a temporary infatuation Rita, because you were let down by that Dino palamino at high school” he said to her.

“ No it’s not just temporary infatuation, I’ve never felt like this before, when we both go down together I feel such ecstasy it’s indescribable daddy”

“ what do mean you both go down together “ he said angrily.

“ We both go down together in sajda in prayers daddy” she expained.

“ oh for a moment I thought “ he whispered to himself.

“ that chapter of my life at high school is closed for ever, after what that Dino palamino did at proms night, I looke all over the school for him and finally I found him in toilets with Sue barker the blonde, doing the unmentionable daddy” she told him.

“ We live in the west, people here have 8,10 different partners before they finally find the right one to marry and settle down, besides what future would you with your hijab and him with his flowing beard have in finding a career or a job in this country”

“ For this reason me and abu-sufyan we are both migrating to the Islamic state of bradfordistan after graduation and marriage daddy” she told him.

“ You are leaving this land of opportunity to live amongst the savages in bradfordistan, most of whom are on welfare, are you out of your mind” he said to her.

“ Abu-sufyan tells me it’s a beautiful city built on 7 hills with halal restaurants and wahabi mosques around every street corner, he tells me it’s surrounded by magical countryside and the famous lake district isn’t far from there either, a mini Switzerland daddy”.

Potohari2 shakes his head and says “ I can’t believe I’m hearing all this after all the precautions I’ve taken, iv’e brought you up in a all white suburb with secular values, paid for your dance classes”.

“ may be it’s just a teenage rebellion, against your secular values she’ll get over it, you don’t need to get all stressed out, with your blood pressure you should go upstairs and lie down” his wife said.
Potohari2 picked his coat from the sofa and headed off upstairs, later in the evening after he had his meal, he went down to his local watering hole.

“ hi paddy, double scotch please” he said to bar tender.

After he had drank his scotch, he said to bar tender “ you know paddy things don’t always quite turnout out as you expect them to “
“Tell me about it, it’s story of my life mike” the bar tender said mournfully.

“ here have another scotch on me and don’t let life get you down mike”

Hours later he left the bar heading home, he thought to himself “ a wahabi for a son in law, well at least it’s not a nigger”.







reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#175 Posted by haji004 on June 2, 2007 10:56:41 am
Re: # 10

chaltahai...i envy you man...i really do...

ahmad hayat
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#174 Posted by hamidm2 on June 2, 2007 10:51:46 am
Re: # 171

masadi,

......... i wish i could share your angst which, i can tell, is killing you ...... but i honestly can`t because the us elite has been `berry berry good` to me and my sprinkler guy from domeli, district rawalpindi (did i tell you that his son is going to harvard b school and his daughter is at uof m law school ?) ............. look, i have nothing to complain about - they pay me good money, with five weeks of vacation, full health care (bc&bs), pension plan, 401k and membership to the northwest airlines world club (where they serve free whiskey and all the peanuts you can eat) .............

.............. but i do understand where you are coming from when you say that the rest of the world is a `hellish place` - on a recent vacation to paris my daughter started crying when she saw how tiny the bathroom was in our rented apartment .........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#173 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 10:33:12 am
#167 by Salim_Chauhan,

Salim Mian,

No matter how much you nitpick or jump up and down like a macaca :

Mutarraf is no Ayub Khan.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#172 Posted by rf786 on June 2, 2007 10:25:25 am
Re: # 163

Read the post again, u missed the meaning.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#171 Posted by masadi on June 2, 2007 10:22:43 am
hamid writes <<< masadi,

.............. you are a tortured soul but, for god`s sake, stop torturing us with your nonense about how the american elite is responsible fro everything from your bad breath to your soiled underwear >>>

Don`t try to trivialize important issues. It is not about your bad breath or soiled underwear, it is about life and death of the vast majority of humankind. Trying to trivialize important issues in this fashion is the hallmark of the corporate mass media (whose lead criminals like you follow) when they sensationalize personal tales to mask what is important.

Nobody, but nobody that sees the world`s condition today can help becomming a ``tortured soul`` except the ignoramuses or those that try escape through intoxicants or unique combinations of both like your “good” self...Wake up fool, neither your kids nor you are immune from the human hell these AHs, the US elite are fast converting the world into, i.e. those parts that are not already hellish that is...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#170 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 2, 2007 9:37:47 am
Once again, MQM announces a change in name.

In a bid to become more Punju-friendly, Altaph Bhai announced another change to MQMs name. He decreed that MQM (Muttahida Qaumi Movement) will now be called MKM (Muttahida Komi Movement).

Not to be outdone, Mushy announced that the PML (Q for Qaaf) will also change its name to PML (K for Kaaf).

Nobody knows how long this spirit of ``feel good come to Jesus kumbaya`` will last in Pakistan. Nawas Sharif of PML (N for Noon) announced that he had no plans to change to the name of his party. He denied the rumor being spread by the vicious MQM, that the ``NOON`` in PML (N for NOON) stood for 12 o`clock as an insult to Sardarjis. Mr. Sharif reiterated that the N for Noon in PML (N) stood for Nawaz
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#169 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 2, 2007 9:28:21 am
#164 {``They are like the captain of the Titanic, who may have done a great job of arranging chairs on the deck of the Titanic, but punched a big hole in the ship. ``}

The big hole in the ship was punched by greedy passengers who were all pulling on the iceberg to get ice for their lassis - regardless of what happened to the ship. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#168 Posted by echoboom on June 2, 2007 9:20:47 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#167 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 2, 2007 9:02:56 am
#157 Zeemax {``Musharraf is no Ayub Khan.``}

Zee,
You got that right. Musharraf cannot be blamed for:

Promoting himself to Field Marshall
Preying on poor Muslim refugee girls at the border and reserving the most beautiful ones for himself
Carrying on a liason with an English prostitute (Christine Keeler) and sharing all kinds of state secrets
Obtaining a car dealership for his son as Ayub did for Gauhar
Having killed many innocent people in Karachi and then dumping their bodies in the sea
Being a total chicken when India retaliated by crossing the international border in 1965 - read Bhutto`s account of the behavior of this ``soldier.``
Spending considerable amounts of state funds to construct a gold course for himself while many Pakistanis lacked basic needs for survival
Sacking the most popular man in East Pakistan out of personal jealousy and fear (I think the man was Gen. Azam Khan) and thus paving the way for Bangladesh
Giving away a huge chunk of Kashmir (Shaksgam) to China as a gift
Promoting a young aristocratic Bhutto only because he was impressed by his vast land holding and a place to hunt
Letting the country`s defenses go to the dogs after 1965 war - leading to the most shameful defeat of Pakistan in 1971
Mocking democracy with the concept of ``basic democrats.``
Setting and justifying the course for future military dictatorships by not restoring democracy in `58

Of course, when there was a Bengali majority in Pakistan, our Punjaibi friends on Chowk did not have any passion for democracy or ``one man one vote.`` Funny how these hypocrites have discovered democracy after the departure of the majority of Pakistanis. Shame.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#166 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 7:41:07 am
#164 by tahmed32,

They are like the captain of the Titanic, who may have done a great job of arranging chairs on the deck of the Titanic, but punched a big hole in the ship.

This is a good analogy. How about instead of chairs on the deck, the chairs around the Captain`s table and who gets to sit on them :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#165 Posted by hamidm2 on June 2, 2007 7:34:56 am


masadi,

.............. you are a tortured soul but, for god`s sake, stop torturing us with your nonense about how the american elite is responsible fro everything from your bad breath to your soiled underwear ........ get a grip on yourself and go out and buy some toothpaste and toilet paper instead of insisting on using the prophet-blessed twigs and stones ! ......... and while you are at it, get some underwire bras for your girllfriends at the jamia hafsa and tell them to stop being ornery and that have a right to demand foreplay ............ jesus, son of al-lah! when will you guys stop whining and start taking responsibility for your actions ...........

......... by the way, i feel sorry for your `students` ........ the poor suckers will now be restricted to reading two books - a fifteen hundred year old goat-eaten manuscript of dubious authorship, and a book of rantings by the original branch davidian .......... armed with this `knowledge` they will be lucky to find a job as a backup suicide bomber ......... good going !
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#164 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 6:53:41 am
zeemax #157 It is not a matter of personalities. It is a matter of what the two have contributed to nation-building in Pakistan. Both Mush and Ayub have done some things well, to give them their due. But both have miserably failed Pakistan by overturning the Constitution. They are like the captain of the Titanic, who may have done a great job of arranging chairs on the deck of the Titanic, but punched a big hole in the ship.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#163 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 6:49:57 am
#158 rf: these are not mere nice words. People in Pakistan spilt blood on May 12 while asserting their basic rights to peaceful assembly. More people died that day than on the day of the Boston Massacre who were asserting similar rights over 200 years ago.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#162 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 6:46:03 am
masadi-the-college-peon: go get samosas and tea and stop gibbering!! :-)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#161 Posted by masadi on June 2, 2007 5:50:34 am
#160 read <<< he will butcher your kids and your grandkids but ensuring they live lives of misery and deprivation >>>

as

<<< he will butcher your kids and your grandkids by ensuring they live lives of misery and deprivation >>>
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#160 Posted by masadi on June 2, 2007 5:44:56 am
tahmed writes <<< Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. >>>

This peon of the US elite will waste not a single opportunity to sing the hamd o naat of the objects of his worship. These words are quite meaningless as factual practice. When religion as legitimator, garbed in patriotism, has encroached in every area of US life, used by its political elite the establishment clause is rendered null and void as ``fact``. When a handfull of corporations dominate the media effectively blocking the access of 99.99% of the public to reach equal audiences, freedom of speech does not exist as fact. When people assemble and petition their government to change its policies as they are doing regarding Iraq, in the very vast majority but decisions are made inspite of them, the last part of these meaningless propaganda does not exist.

This peon of the West, tahmed has the audacity to talk about ``banana republic`` knowing full well that US corporations are implicated in the very political construct of such a republic yet he will never assign any blame to them. What Pakistan needs is not meaningless propaganda like the above quote by tahmed but it needs to identify people like tahmed among its elite and then drag them through the streets of Pakistan and remove them from any and every position of authority. People like him are snakes, they talk sweet but they want to keep us enslaved to those they worship, they are those who sold us to the British earlier on and now want to keep us subservient to the US elite. Know your enemy, he will butcher your kids and your grandkids but ensuring they live lives of misery and deprivation, while he talks sweet about democracy and freedom of speech and other US propaganda BS.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#159 Posted by masadi on June 2, 2007 5:22:08 am
chaltahai writes <<< Instead of blaming the US, how about applying the blame to the very people who call their land Pakistan. How come the chinese or indians don;t blame the US for historical wrongs. >>>

Just because you are illiterate does not mean your arguments hold water. If the US was so deeply connected to a ruling institution in a country that was leading it down the drain then you would see similar arguments coming out of the intelligent folk in both India and China. There is a lot of criticism of the US policies coming out of both countries, just because you are naively unaware of it does not mean it doesn`t exist. When both India and China during a much longer priod of history than the current had unaligned themselves from the US dominated economic system, their logic was based on much the same arguments as mine. Regarding the world ``chugging along``, which world are you talking about, India? where more people per 100 live below the poverty rate than Pakistan? What kind of development is that? The world is going from bad to worse, the winners are just the select few handpicked Caucasian countries or a couple other US restructured and occupied countries, the rest of the world is in the gutter, some more than others.

Urstruly: The Quran is not dependant on modern weaponry for its re-interpretation which would actually be distortion, the conditions for justified killing are clearly defined and located within the guilty party, killing others knowingly whether you call it collateral damage or terrorism is premeditated murder and cannot be excused through interpretation. If you blame those living within the so-called ``democratic`` countries as being responsible for their govt`s policies, then you are just as much a victim of deception about the nature of democracy in those countries than those living within them. Like I have said, the CVI- the Crusader Version of Islam takes its ``morality`` and ``values`` from the crusaders, and that is how the higher terrorists- whom you apparently fight- define the issues and propagandize their masses...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#158 Posted by rf786 on June 2, 2007 4:03:03 am
Re: # 155

All very nice words that need to be backed up with action and rich tradition. Unfortunately in our case its just a piece of paper with no tradition of respecting state constitution. Here lies root of the problem, one that has been compounded by military intervention and religious lobbies attempt to monopolize ideological debate.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#157 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:57:50 am
#149 by tahmed32,

tahmed, Ayub Khan was a lot better person than musharraf. Ayub khan was classy and had self-respect and had stepped down voluntarily when he had seen the wall chalkings of `ayub kutta hai hai` ... and had never brought out the army against the protesting public.

On the other hand musharraf is a low-class mediocre with no self-respect and totally blind who has reacted with the burning of just one effigy of his by calling in the corps commanders and declaring ``A small minority will not be allowed to dictate to a large majority`` when the whole country is abusing him left and right. He still can`t see the writing on the wall. Musharraf is no Ayub Khan.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#156 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:56:48 am
Think about this. Cheers.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#155 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:55:40 am
rf: this is what Pakistan needs in order to head in the right direction:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

(US Constitution, first amendment)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#154 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:53:42 am
#153 rf: What is in the interest of the nation? That we should have the basic rights of Pakistanis protected, or that they should be over-ridden by generals?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#153 Posted by rf786 on June 2, 2007 3:51:33 am
Re: # 137

{the Chief Justice is defying the military order against public gatherings issued yesterday. Where to you think all this is headed?}

Up sh!t creek wud be the short and dirty answer, if Mush was wrong in sacking the CJ then the CJ is absolutely wrong in parading himself as the leader of opposition. This is not good news for Pakistan where individual ego`s are superceding interest pf the nation.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#152 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:50:51 am
#150 mullahs are all sarkari. guess where their money comes from? Allah doesnt pay the maulvi by the hour.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#151 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:50:14 am
#148 by rf786,

Ja bhai ... ab kal key girjey ki tayarri kar :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#150 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:48:26 am
#147 by tahmed32,

tahmed you always have this problem in differentiating between the Islamist political parties aka sarkari mullahs and the tanzeemis whom I talk about.

Bhai when I talk about Juhadis or Tanzeemis, I`m not talking about JUI, JUP, JI or the rest. I`m talking about the apolitical Hafiz Saeed of Muridke, Sufi Muhammad of TNSM, Abdullah Mehsud of Bajaur and last but not the least and perhaps the most potent, the Lal Masjid.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#149 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:47:27 am
#145 zeemax: in 1966 they had street demonstrations that continued day after day until Ayub Khan said he was stepping down. perhaps we will have a repeat of that - which isnt a good outcome either, since people get killed in the process.

So, let us just pray that those in power get some sense and ``khuda ka khauf`` in their heads for a change and realize that Pakistan is too sophisticated a country with too large a middle class to be run like a banana republic anymore. In the 1980`s there was an editorial in the Washington Post that said exactly this thing as well.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#148 Posted by rf786 on June 2, 2007 3:43:04 am
Re: # 143

{I thought you were hindoo but turns out you`re christian}

Please, dont strain your punny little bigoted monkey brain over such matters, u need all the energy to serve your master, Lucifer aka OBL and his wahabi cohorts. By the way, the family snapshot u posted of yourself, courtesy Lucifer inc., showed your ugly side.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#147 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:42:42 am
#145 zeemax: dont bet too muc on the religious parties. they would be taken apart by a single military battalion if they tried to openly confront the military. all they can do is plant bombs and kill innocent people.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#146 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:40:43 am
#144 rf: Pakistan is now almost at the top of the list of most dangerous countries (in a list published couple of days ago by some international watchdog agency). We only have to beat Iraq, Russia, Nigeria and a couple of other countries. :-( What are we paying Musharraf for?? (As Pakistanis citizens, he and the rest of the military are our public servant, right?)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#145 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:40:35 am
#142 by tahmed32,

Sure the democracy movement has legs for street demonstrations but it doesn`t have the firepower for confronting the army. Once a few protesters are killed by the army, that will draw in the Islamists with the firepower to seize mass public support in confronting the army bullet by bullet and IEDs/suicide bombings etc.

So, ``ravi cheyn hi cheyn likhta hai`` :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#144 Posted by rf786 on June 2, 2007 3:36:04 am
Re: # 133

Yaar tahmed32,

700 Pak soldiers killed, hundreds of civilians killed in suicide bombings, murders and executions, schools for girls being closed by threat of violence and bombings, music shops being closed, barbers closing business, Lal Masjid spreading their tentacles in Isloo. Tip of the ice-berg.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#143 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:35:05 am
#138 by rf786,

... they say Lucifer...

I thought you were hindoo but turns out you`re christian ... hmmm
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#142 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:33:55 am
#140 zeemax: Martial Law again. :-( Or bloodshed, if the democracy movement (which is what this is) shows it has legs. :-(
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#141 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:32:36 am
...contd #140 ...

If you had seen clips of the corps commanders conference yesterday, you would have seen how obvious it is. They were sitting there laughing and smirking. It`s no big deal as long as amreeka is supporting them.

Now where`s the freedom & democracy that your adopted beacon of light of a country is supposed to uphold? It is actually instigating a civil-war.

However, a Martial-Law will split the army between junior cadres and the generals. For sure. Half the `jawans` are bearded Islamists who wouldn`t commit fratricide.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#140 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:28:11 am
#137 by tahmed32,

Where to you think all this is headed?

Just as Pir Pagara said, he can hear the marching boots but the sound of left-right left-right still hasn`t reached his ears.

It means Martial-Law :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#139 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:25:55 am
#136 by tahmed32,

Nope. BB didn`t create Taliban either but they were created during her tenure long after Zia had been jahannum-raseed. So your statement was wrong that both were created by Zia.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#138 Posted by rf786 on June 2, 2007 3:25:52 am
Re: # 131

{Are you and me paws of the same cat? Apparently we do share a creator ...}

tahmed32, r u going to sit back and allow such desecration?

Pee-max, I have it from good authority, even the creator does not take responsibility for your creation, they say Lucifer looks upon the pee-max.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#137 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:24:24 am
#131 zeemax/rf: the Chief Justice is defying the military order against public gatherings issued yesterday. Where to you think all this is headed?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#136 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:22:14 am
#131 zeemax: you actually believe that (that bb created taliban)?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#135 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:21:40 am
#132 by rf786,

Mr. jhooti bismillah, the latter is a sucker no doubt, but how`s the former a bluff after killing 700 regular troops and outgunning the rest?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#134 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:20:50 am
#132 rf: i had to look up ``sucker punch`` - surprise punch it says. we have no right to be surprised anymore. the writing is on the wall: general elections have a special meaning in pakistan.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#133 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:18:36 am
#132 rf: people have been killed by these paws. no sucker punches here.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#132 Posted by rf786 on June 2, 2007 3:14:16 am
Re: # 126

{Taliban and MQM: Two paws of the same cat.}

One is just a bluff and the other sucker punch, now lets see how smart u r in figuring out which is which. Hint: 700 Pak soldiers killed already on the western border.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#131 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:13:43 am
#130 by tahmed32,

Wrong. Taliban were the creation during BB regime after Zia. Pls. check your facts.

Besides it would be insufficient ground to make them `paws of the same cat` anyway ... !

Are you and me paws of the same cat? Apparently we do share a creator ... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#130 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 3:09:00 am
@129 zeemax: taliban were the creation of zia. mqm was the creation of zia.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#129 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:05:00 am
#126 by tahmed32,

Taliban and MQM: Two paws of the same cat.

How do you say that? Have you ever heard of Taliban collecting bhatta on gunpoint?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#128 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:02:57 am
But Shah’s brother Atiqur Rehman actually practised the Barelvi version of Islam and had a large following as a pir in Tank. When Talibanisation came to the area, he fled to Karachi ...

Yeah he must have collected enough money from the poor people of Tank through handing out ganda/taweez to buy a nice bungalow in Karachi.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#127 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 3:00:17 am
Adamkhan`s iLog

June 1, 2007

The city of Quaid needs a heavy dose of Gandhi-giri....

Sure. But not the frontier gandhi Bacha Khan type who was as wily as his hindoo counterpart, but that of his mentor Fakir of Ippi type.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#126 Posted by tahmed32 on June 2, 2007 2:53:05 am
Taliban and MQM: Two paws of the same cat.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#125 Posted by rf786 on June 2, 2007 1:49:59 am

And the Taliban terrorist juggernaut continues to rampage across the frontier and the noble citizens of Pakistan remain oblivious of the impending diseaster.


Editorial: Descent into nihilism and anarchy

A hundred-strong group of terrorists armed with rockets, hand grenades and automatic rifles, assaulted the house of a government official in the Tank district of the North Western Frontier Province (NWFP) on Thursday and killed 13 men, women and children in an act of “Islamic execution”. This is another incident inside the settled areas of the province pointing to the diminishing hold of the government and state on its territory.

Tank used to be a part of the Dera Ismail Khan (DI Khan) district, but now exists as an independent district 40 miles from it and 200 miles from Peshawar, the capital of the province. The man whose house was attacked was the political agent of Khyber Agency, Syed Amiruddin Shah, who was not at home. (Tank as a settled district doesn’t have a political agent but a nazim.) His brothers were cruelly put to death, while one brother, Pir Atiqur Rehman, who lives in Karachi and whose controversial writings could have unleashed the attacks, was not present in the house.

The warlord offended with the family was one-legged Abdullah Mehsud, an old inmate of Guantanamo Bay released by the Americans some years ago. Mr Mehsud was connected to the Deobandi-jihadi seminary of Banuri Mosque complex at Karachi through his spiritual mentor Mufti Jamil who was killed in the sectarian war of 2003-04 along with other leaders of the Banuri complex. Convinced that the state was involved in the death of his teachers, Abdullah Mehsud kidnapped foreign Chinese workers from the Tribal Areas and ended up killing one of them.

The quarrel with the family of Syed Amiruddin Shah arose from the clash that all Deobandis have with the Sufi or mystical version of Islam. But Shah’s brother Atiqur Rehman actually practised the Barelvi version of Islam and had a large following as a pir in Tank. When Talibanisation came to the area, he fled to Karachi and began accusing the Taliban warlords, in particular Abdullah Mehsud, of being US agents (sic!). The geography of Tank forbids this kind of rebellion against the ruling creed: Tank district is bounded by South Waziristan to the southwest, west, and northwest.

The NWFP information minister, Asif Iqbal, has said the people attacking Tank represented “small independent groups” operating under the Taliban who are inspired by Al Qaeda and are busy spreading its nihilist worldview across Pakistani territory. A former adviser on the affairs of the troubled tribal areas, Brigadier (Retd) Mehmood Shah, thinks that the latest spike of terrorist attacks inside the NWFP is the punishment that the Jamiat Ulema Islam (JUI) is enduring for not cooperating with the federal government in eliminating the troublemakers.

The brigadier has clearly got it wrong. What is happening in the region is what the JUI within the MMA has long wanted. The manifesto of the NWFP government clearly shows that it anticipated Talibanisation and vowed to support it by bringing laws that would allow the government clerics to do exactly what the warlords are doing today in the various districts of the province. So he got it right when he said, “The JUI (Fazlur Rehman group) is the political face of Islamic militancy in Pakistan”. But he got it wrong again when he said, “Had the MMA helped us crush tribal militancy, they would not have faced the Tank situation today”. The MMA supports tribal militancy. How can it help the government crush it?

There is a lot of confusion in Pakistan over understanding the nature of violence in the country. What the Taliban want in the Tribal Areas is articulated in the mosques of the big cities in the settled areas. At any given time in Lahore, for instance, you will hear demands for the setting up of precisely the kind of governance demanded by the Taliban and implemented in the tribal areas. Most of us think that this kind of worldview in Lahore comes from fringe elements, but on close examination more and more people are embracing this discourse as their key to replacing the present “America-enslaved” system.

Most of us shy away from disputing this worldview with the clergy because the clergy quotes the Quran and hadith, thus exposing us to the possibility of blasphemy through repudiating the scripture. This is the “winning” discourse in Pakistan and elsewhere in the Islamic world — and the expatriate Muslim communities now at odds with the societies in which they live. This discourse comes to the fore on a daily basis through the nostalgic Urdu columns praising the “Golden Age of the Taliban rule” when “you could travel across Afghanistan with a box of jewellery without being robbed”.

The current phase of Muslim thought is nihilistic, of tearing down without building, of creating disorder to oppose the order we don’t like because we think it is West-ordained. The tribal areas and increasingly parts of the NWFP are in the grip of this anarchy of our minds. The tragedy is that the state doesn’t know how to deal with this situation
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#124 Posted by zeemax on June 2, 2007 12:54:44 am
#94 by Naqshbandi

...when the great sufi mujahid of libya -- umar al mukhtar --fought against the occupying italians under mussolini and the fascists committed atrocities he FORBADE his own fighters from doing the same saying, ``they are not our teachers``....

The great Umar Mukhtar a `Sufi Mujahid`? Firstly this is an oxymoron. Secondly Salahuddin Ayubi said something like this as well when he gave safe passage to the defeated crusaders out of Jerusalem to the sea when those same people had massacred every single Muslim when they had captured the city.

Was Salahuddin Ayubi a `Sufi`?

Magnanimity and mercy are basic traits of Islam and political Islam follows those principles.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#123 Posted by HP on June 2, 2007 12:40:30 am

#101 by GT
“1. Has the `movement` spread to rural areas?
2. Is the `movement` confined to the elites?”

Your first question implies that you are trying to find out how widespread the ‘movement’ is currently. It appears to have a wide ranging support in the urban areas. So in a way we can say that the current movement has a strong vocal support. That support may not translate in to street power for various reasons and we will perhaps get a chance to look at those factors as the drama unfolds in the coming weeks and months.

To answer the rural support part, I would say that this movement is not in the rural areas nor does it have any chance of spreading to the rural areas. Specifically, Pakistani rural population is self sufficient enough to survive without meddling in the state affairs.

Empirically, in the modern history, there are only two instances in the world when rural populations were involved in sufficient numbers to change the political landscape. The rural Russia after the 1917 revolution and in China during the Japanese occupation that led to Mao’s revolution, are perhaps the only two reasonable examples.

Closer home, throughout the Indian independence movement the rural population was barely involved in any part of the independence movement. In the Pakistani part of India, the rural areas participation was even less than the northern part of India.

There are not enough incentives for any one to take this movement to the rural areas. If that were to happen, Pakistan will plunge into anarchy.

Now the second part: I would like to see your definition of Pakistani elite. I don’t consider lawyers, school teachers and the average political workers as elite. And since I don’t think they are Pakistan elite, I can say that the movement is NOT confined to Pakistan elite. It certainly has grassroots support.

However, I would say this now and I think it is a good sign that this movement is at least for now is confined to Punjab alone. It seems to have grassroots support in the Punjabi cities and that is a good omen.

Punjabis in Pakistan are the most pro-establishment people. If they continued to stand up against the establishment, then it would be whole lot easier for Sindh and Baluchistan to join the movement at a later stage. However, the problem is that while Punjabis are riled up against one section of the establishment,-the army- they are trying to propel the other section of the establishment, the courts.

I think it is generally a Pakistani middle class uprising against the state and its dominant apparatus, the army. Pakistani middle class has time and again failed to support pro democracy movements in the past. But this time they have taken the initiative and the army now is facing the section of the population which stayed in the army’s corner in the past and helped the army to suppress pretty much all democratic movements in Pakistan.

“that rural Punjab identifies more with the army than the fundoos. Am I wrong?”

Just a few districts in Punjab identify with army. Fundoos never had any influence in the rural Punjab. Fundoos have no popular support in Punjab. The Fundoo support in lower middle class in Punjabi cities especially in Lahore, is a new phenomenon. However, it needs to be tested to get a good grasp of the kind of support they enjoy. It could merely be a propaganda battle they are winning because of the support they have in the media. Only the elections and the popular vote can tell us how much support fundoos have now.






reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#122 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 9:04:40 pm
GT, there`s no danger of complete polarization. Nor is that remotely desirable! Thus, the most important goal of understanding differences has to be discovering creative and sustainable methods of bridging those differences. Otherwise, everybody loses out on too much. (A big thumbs up icon here for you, GT! :))

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#121 Posted by arjun2 on June 1, 2007 8:04:00 pm
comrade masadi is back working for the peon factory?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#120 Posted by GT on June 1, 2007 7:17:22 pm
Re: # 119 philosopher:

He has been able to implement ... a tiny part of what he wants to implement.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#119 Posted by philosopher on June 1, 2007 6:47:50 pm
Re: # 118GT

Masadi is a good fellow, but i cannot understand what is it in his ilog that you have found so impressive.can you please enlighten me?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#118 Posted by GT on June 1, 2007 6:42:28 pm

Guys check out masadi`s ilog ...... I have a feeling that he may get to laugh last. Hamid take note.

I cannot wish him the best because I do not agree with him, but I would be lying if I say that I am not impressed with the guy.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#117 Posted by GT on June 1, 2007 6:33:56 pm

kaal:

No matter who agrees with you or who you agree with - you cannot get complete polarization .... I am sorry. At the end of the day we are individuals and individualism has and will dominate ..... Islam or no Islam, Hinduism or no Hinduism. Interpretations will always be relevant ..... stop that and the ism will be swept away by the individual.

p.s. It does sound a bit `dorky`, but you get my vibe...yes?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#116 Posted by rahul_capri on June 1, 2007 5:58:22 pm
``Such ``sufism`` is akin to th Homeopathis system of medicine. Keep diluting religion & it becomes mor potent and adding some sugar granules finishes off the acceptance even to the diabetics.`` priceless !!
also, treat according to symptoms without worrying about the root cause.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#115 Posted by anil on June 1, 2007 5:31:59 pm
I do not understand what is objectionable in Echoboom`s posting #114 to be banned.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#114 Posted by echoboom on June 1, 2007 4:41:53 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#113 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 4:30:38 pm
he he, thank you, echo dada; you know that my (sometimes tongue-in-cheek) comments mean no impudence. :)

You are so right about Hazrat Ali being the ultimate Sufi. Only if these charasis and their Hindu and modern-day Persian friends understood that. And respected Sufism for what it actually is. :)

Regards.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#112 Posted by echoboom on June 1, 2007 3:52:31 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#111 Posted by arjun2 on June 1, 2007 3:33:51 pm
Even pakis are seeing the reality: blood sucking welfare queens of the paki army are why pakiland hasn`t produced any real company/corporation that`s known outside pakiland....

Military Inc a best seller

ISLAMABAD: Dr Ayesha Siddiqa’s book ‘Military Inc.’ has attracted a great deal of interest as testified by the fact that the first edition was sold out on the day it was released (Thursday). Dr Ayesha confirmed on Friday that all 1,000 copies sold out on the day of the launch. She also said she experienced tremendous pressure in the days leading up to the book launch. “Information Minister Muhammad Ali Durrani phoned me twice to persuade me to cancel the book launch. He also wanted to see me in person but then he did not turn up.” Dr Ayesha said the book was written with the best intentions. “It is an effort to seek improvements in the institution [army] and not to malign it,” she said, adding the military should focus on professionalism rather than politics. Oxford University Press will release more copies of the book within three days. OUP Managing Director Ameena Sayed told Daily Times she was amazed at the demand for the book. Sayed said demand took off because of the government’s efforts to stop the launch coupled with the prevailing political environment in the country. She said no pressure was exerted on OUP before or after the release of the book. “We have already published nearly 20 books on the Pakistan military. We are ready to print the military’s version if they want to counter Dr Ayesha’s book,” she said. sajjad malik
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#110 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 2:53:28 pm
dm, naqs hbai

No doubt sufism was, and remains, laid out as a slippery slope for non-Muslims. But sometimes, it seems, it could also become a slippery slope for Muslims themselves if they begin to sincerely and fully believe in it. Kind of ironic revenge of persistent shirk and Hinduism, as it were.

But Islam is pretty clear about its own preservation, and most `sufis,` when they have an option to choose real Islam, should be expected to snap out of any sincere faith in Sufism with a little bit of Islamic education.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#109 Posted by dost_mittar on June 1, 2007 2:14:43 pm
Naqshbandi#104:

...But you can see where Kaal is coming from. This kind of poetry is alluring to the Hindu who does not find any difference between this sort of poetry or Nanak`s saying ``Naa hum Hindu naa Mussalmaan`` and see for the universal message in the Sufi poetry. For a Muslim, when the Sufi says, ``Rab unaaN nooN milda, NeetaaN jinaan diyaaN sachiyaaN), it seems to dilute the message that you cannot be close to Allah without saying ``There is no god but God and Muhammad is His prophet``. It could be a slippery slope for Muslims, isn`t it?

#107:

I thought so. Welcome to the club!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#108 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 2:13:27 pm
re: echo dada # 98

Actually, but for a few labels, and except for its complete political association with Islam alone ultimately, that kind of sufism is indistinguishable from any of a myriad dumbed-down forms of village Hinduism.

If you recall, there used be a delightful Sufi gentleman on chowk - a gem of a guy - using the nick `Temporal.` A real hoot. We can be sure you miss him and his words of wisdom sometimes.:)

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#107 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 2:03:24 pm
dostmittar - the anwer to your q is yes i dont think the state has a role directly anymore.

a lover is not biased. He sees Allah evrywhere and in everything --not literally ofcourse but everrthing reminds him (her) of His Beloved. ``Wheresoever thou turneth thou shalt find the Face of God`` (Koran)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#106 Posted by chaltahai on June 1, 2007 1:57:22 pm
Re: # 105 everyone including C Wright Mills knows that Bulleyshah is a US Elite.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#105 Posted by dost_mittar on June 1, 2007 1:55:21 pm
Naqsh:

I was not questioning his antecedeants. Yes, he was a sunni by birth but his poetry seems to be free of any sectarian bias.

As for Bahu`s poem, the translation does not have the same flavour as the original ``Jay rab milda naatya dhotyaaN, tay milda daduaaN, machhiaN``.

BTW, you are one of the few chowkies who seems to have evolved over time. I was wondering if you now fully believe that religion should be strictly in the personal domain and the state should not be influenced by any religious doctrine in formulating state laws?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#104 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 1:54:46 pm
Re: # 97

to save me a lot of time and effort please see the link below by dr. timothy winter of cambridge university who is now shaykh abd al hakim murad for your answer to your question:

http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/ahm/recapturing.htm

http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/ahm/fgtnrevo.htm

http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/ahm/newmadhh.htm


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#103 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 1:45:08 pm
dostmittar
yes he was. his biographical details are quite well known. his real name was abdullah shah and he was from qasur and he took bayat (sufi initiation) into the Qadri Tariqa of Pir Sayyid Abdal Qadir al Jilani (of Baghdad. d. about 1100) at the hands of his pir Shah Inayat Khan. Bulleh Shah was also a sayyid and a direct descendent of Pir Sayyid Abdal Qadir Shah (quds sirruhu).
His poetry is that of a lover drowned in love of God and therefore not unlike that of Rumi. The metaphors are not meant literally. He was not only a Sunni Muslim but a great alim too.
Read the link to his biography at apnaorg.com or at wikipedia.

another poem:


If the lord were found by bathing and washing, He would be found
By frogs and fish.
If the lord were found by having long hair, He would be found
By sheep and goats.
If the lord were found by staying awake all night, He would be found
By the cuckoo.
If the Lord were found by being celibate, he would be found
By gelded oxen.
The Lord is only found by those, Bahu, whose intentions
Are good.

( Death before Dying – Sultan Bahu)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#102 Posted by dost_mittar on June 1, 2007 1:33:16 pm
Naqshbandi#92:

Are you sure Bulla was a Sunni Muslim? This is what he said:

HiNdu na naheeN musalmaan,
Baheeye tiranjan taj abhimaan.
Sunni na naheeN ham sheeya
Sulha kuhl ka maarag leeya.
Bhookhe na naheeN ham rahje,
NaNge na naheeN ham kahje.
RoNde na naheeN ham hasde
UjaRe na naheeN ham vasde.
Paapi na sudharmi na,
Paap pun ki raah na jaanaaN.
Bulhe Shah jo hari chit laage,
Hindu turak doojan tiyaage

Translation:

Neither Hindu nor Muslim,
Sacrificing pride, let us sit together.
Neither Sunni nor Shia,
Let us walk the road of peace.
We are neither hungry nor replete,
Neither naked nor covered up.
Neither weeping nor laughing,
Neither ruined nor settled,
We are not sinners or pure and virtuous,
What is sin and what is virtue, this I do not know.
Says Bulhe Shah, one who attaches his self with the lord.
Gives up both hindu and muslim.

The original punjabi is more easily recognizable as something from a Hindu Bhagat than a Muslim. [It is surprising how Pakistanis have purged Punjabi of its original flavour by substituting local with imported vocabulary].
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#101 Posted by GT on June 1, 2007 1:26:51 pm
Re: # 26 by HP:

HP,

I have been asking for quite sometime now, but no-one has replied. So as a last resort I am asking you, though I know that you do not live in Pakistan.

1. Has the `movement` spread to rural areas?
2. Is the `movement` confined to the elites?

On what you wrote. Specifically: ``Most of the problems in Pakistan undeniably start from the army hegemony over the state.``

3. What would happen if a section (no matter how small) of the army were to break away and identify with some part of the ``opposition``? Is such a situation likely? If it is likely, then which section of the ``opposition`` would this group align with? How would the MQM react then?

4. I believe, perhaps because of your earlier writings, that rural Punjab identifies more with the army than the fundoos. Am I wrong?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#100 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 1:19:55 pm
Re: # 94

I am open to learning on this topic. If `indescriminate killing is forbidden` is the argument then not only nuclear weapons but all kinds of air-to-surface and surface-to-surface missiles and bombs, consequently all kind of airforce, cannons, tanks, land mines, chemical and biological weapons fall into this category. The modern army thus should have only assault rifles set on manual fire only.

I think we have to be reasonable and logical about the modern warfare. Especially the coming wars that are inevitable where war is between civilians and organized armies, for example, like in Iraq or Afghanistan, Kashmir, Chechenya, and Waziristan. In such wars everytime an Iraqi, Kashmiri, or Waziri dies he is a civilians but when their enemy dies he is usually a regular army soldier.

I can totally understand `no innocent must die`` argument in the context of arm to arm combat where swords and spears are used and killer has a chance to evaluate the innocence of his victim but now.....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#99 Posted by chaltahai on June 1, 2007 1:10:22 pm
You fool, the US elite have coopted C. Mills and made a kaffir out of him. These US elites are also behind the plague in 1412, the sacking of rome in 120 AD and single handedly erected the Great Wall to keep Mongols out. They created such global ills as the Ford Pinto (which is still the car of choice in Cuba-runs on rubber bands and platano juice), the sick dance called the Lindy and have given the world Al Gore.

Without the US elite, we would all be marrying cousins and riding camels in North America. And wouldn`t that be fun? US Elite were behind Musharraf, literally some might say..all 1700 of them. They were there when Nehru was giving Mrs. Mountmybatten dirty sanchez`s. They were there when Manto first heard Jinnah`s speech on Aug 11th 1947 (or was it 14th).

The US elite are the scourge that is behind Dacing with the Stars, Lesbian Lahori chix and women in general. We need to get them out of pakistan. A No to US elites is a no to Lesbian chix and a NO to women..frankly who needs them..when there are so many surma laden olive skinned boys in Peshawar.

Long live pakistan..Long Live C Wright Mills, Long Live Third Rate Educational Institutions..Long Live Surma

US Elite Murdabad.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#98 Posted by echoboom on June 1, 2007 1:09:31 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#97 Posted by abu_safwaan on June 1, 2007 1:06:18 pm
Re: # 95
Could u please eloborate as to which injunction of ``whabiism`` is a bigger threat than lets say the zion/neo-con lobby? Please be specific, not that I am a follower of wahabiisim, i always thought I was a Muslim but since your insistance is that since I don`t think its fard on me to bang my head at a mazar therefore i am no longer the follwoer of ``Islam`` and a wahabi now, i am interested in finding out, which practice of ur understanding of wahabiism forces u to believe that it kicks one out of the folds of Islam?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#96 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 1:02:11 pm
the bit in bold is very relevant to the terrorists of jamia hafsa and their action too...


The problem with the individuals behind actions such as the kidnappings in Iraq, or the monstrosity in Beslan is that they are motivated by their raw passions and act on ignorance. Thus, they are misguided, and act in misguided ways, while the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) told us that, “None of you believes until their whims are made to follow the guidance I have come with.” [Nawawi’s 40 Hadith, from Kitab al-Hujja; Nawawi said: it is rigorously authenticated (sahih)]

Those who take the law in their own hands are brigands and outlaws, and have nothing to do with the example of the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace), who was sent as a mercy to all humanity, a light of guidance, an exemplification of all good. Can any of us ever imagine the Beloved Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) ever doing anything like these acts? Or condoning anything like this?

Don’t miss:

Bombing Without Moonlight: The Origins of Suicidal Terrorism (http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/ahm/moonlight.htm)
by Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad

And Allah alone gives success.

Wassalam,
Faraz Rabbani
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#95 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 12:56:06 pm
Re: # 93

bhai there is no my islam and your islam. there is just islam and what wahabism represents is not it. as for external enemies--none of them are as dangerous for the long term survival of islam as a vibrant faith than wahabi neokharijitism.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#94 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 12:53:43 pm
urstruly--MOST islamic scholars are against nuclear weapons for the very reason that they kill indiscriminately. and the VAST MAJORITY are against suicide bombings too. go to sunnipath.com if you want some real islamic fatwas on such topics or to livingislam.org.


this is because islam has STRICT conditions even in warfare. NO non´combatants can be harmed in anyway. and the argument that íf ``the enemy has this weapon or is doing this to me
so i can do the same back`` is not valid according to the jurists. two wrongs dont make a right.
when the great sufi mujahid of libya -- umar al mukhtar --fought against the occupying italians under mussolini and the fascists committed atrocities he FORBADE his own fighters from doing the same saying, ``they are not our teachers``.

See in real Islam morals and ethics are NEVER abandoned even in warfare. islamofascists are just politically hungry demagogues USING Islam for their political goals.
i dont like many aspects of khomeini ´s theology or system in iran--which many shia traditionalists also opposed--for example grand ayatullah al-khoie--but i respect him for refusing to chemically retaliate against iraq or to pursue nukes saying it is unislamic.

the only arguments some scholars put forward for having nukes is that it could act as a deterrent.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#93 Posted by abu_safwaan on June 1, 2007 12:41:19 pm
Re: # 89
Naqshbandi,

Could u stop with the insanity? Go to Data sahib and do what? Whether bulleh shah was a better Muslim than you & I, thats for Allah swt to decide, how does that help you that he was a Good Muslim? Why do I have to go anywhere when Allah swt says I am closer to you than your jugular vain? What sort of immense insecurity forces you 2 go on these tirades especially when barelwiyat is not even the topic of discussion. Maybe instead of going to data sahab if you had gone to Haram shareef, you wouldnt be this confused and delusional but then again they dont serve weed there so I can dig the inclination. If you have an ounce of sincerity not to mention common sense, stop with this ``My islam is better than your`s`` rhetoric. We are faced bigger enemies who are out there for our annihilation and then wont spare u just because r cool enuff to shake it on qawalli. We have differences in masail and that should be celebrated rather than a cause for hatred and infighting.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#92 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 12:40:51 pm
Repeating the name of the Beloved
I have become the Beloved myself.
Whom shall I call the Beloved now?

-Bulleh Shah (rahmatullah alayhi)

the person who said that in a 1000 years from now people will STILL be revering Bulleh Shah
and yet these islamist wahabi maulvis and politicians will be forgotten in a lifetime has spoken the best words on Chowk ever!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#91 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 12:33:35 pm
http://www.apnaorg.com/poetry/bullahn/index.html
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#90 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 12:28:20 pm
Masadi,

5:32 says in the end .. ``yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.``

(Yusuf Ali)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#89 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 12:28:15 pm
majumdar--i agree that if pak was officially a secular country then traditional islam .i.e. barelvi aka sufi islam aka as sunni islam (as opposed to the minority sect of the wahabis-deobandis) would dominate paki society as it traditionally has done (as is the case in india). and i have no problem with that. BUT since the wobbs are on the march and since the govt ie mushy appoints various people to various religious posts e.g. minister for religion, imam of the major mosques (badshahi mosque, islamabad mosque etc.) it would be better to take deobandis out of these high profile roles and give them to sunnis.

also promote traditional islam on the national tv channels.

as for those who mock sufism and pretend sufis have not contributed in politics they dont know about the history of the naqshbandi order in our part of the world or of the sufis in chechnya or turkey or north africa or the murabitoon etc. all of them fought against occupying forces and armies and yet kept strictly to the sufi zikr and other ceremonies which you wahabis mock. and without getting into theological arguments again all of the acts of sufi tariqahs are justified by quran and sunnah. to give one example from imam rabbani--whom deobandis and opponents of sufism turn to when cornered--advises his murids to picture him in front of them wherever they are and to meditate on this image and he says this can lead to spiritual enlightenment and spiritual union with the shaykh. he called it tassawur e shaykh and the shaykh can help the disciple from afar.

educate yourself first.

and the idiots who are mocking baba bulleh shah: a muslim like him is not to be found in the whole history of the wahabi-salafi-deobandi-islamist movement. indeed he was closer to Allah than all of you islamists put together will ever be. so spare him please. he was a saint and pakistan is full of sufi saints (koranic arabic--awliya --literally Friends of God) as is India.

you should go to Data Sahib and maybe God will clean your heart of hatred.

Read the poetry of Baba Bulleh Shah.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#88 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 12:21:28 pm
#81 by Urstruly,

I`ve quoted this before and I`ll quote it again. The Pakistan nation gives away an estimated Rs. 7-9 billion every year to madrassas and mosques according to government figures.

And some people think Pakistan belongs to the 2% oligarchs.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#87 Posted by aslam644 on June 1, 2007 12:16:03 pm
tahmed
bbc is doing series on th 1960`s

Sex, drugs and hype
1960s - TIME OF SOCIAL CHANGEThe formerly rigid social structures began to break down, as `meritocracy` became a social phenomenon.the Magazine is compiling a people`s history of modern Britain - featuring your written memories and photos. We started last week with the 1950s, which means we now have the decade you voted (see below) as the one you would most like to live in. After the post-war hardship and the belt-tightening of the 1950s, there was a feeling that anything was possible in the 60s. Britain entered a golden age of heady optimism, so the story goes, and Harold Wilson hailed the dawn of the classless society.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6707405.stm
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#86 Posted by chaltahai on June 1, 2007 12:13:43 pm
Masadi, Instead of blaming the US, how about applying the blame to the very people who call their land Pakistan. How come the chinese or indians don;t blame the US for historical wrongs. How come the rest of the world is chugging along, growing eonomically under the leadership of the US. It is always the laggards i.e. muslims who have an issue with assigning blame to things outside their own supposedly perfect models. Guess what..if the supposed panacea of islam was indeed what you believe then it would have worked somewhere. unfortunately it is impossible to see in practice as it is an anachronistic notion based on faulty ideas.

With Pakistan, the problem is that people have no stomach for pain and combined with the heavy dose of religion (which invariably seeks a Messiah for delivery from all ills) hope is placed constantly in the Prophets Du Jour, be they generals or Bhuttos or whomever. Fix this and pakistan has a chance
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#85 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 12:12:49 pm
Re: # 84

I was not allowed to qualify my answer.

However, I do think that due to the nature of modern warfare and kind of weaponary involved 5:32 can be re-interpretted.

At philosophical level are people really innocent in a democracy; where a democraticaly elected government committs horendous crimes agaisnt other people?

Moral dilemmas aside, if there is a war, and if I do not kill my enemy first then I would get killed, I would rather choose a weapon that works for me rather than a weapon that my enemy wants me to use or not use.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#84 Posted by masadi on June 1, 2007 12:00:03 pm
#83 URstruly writes <<< expected and anticipated number of collateral damage.>>>

Bush would give similar justification for dropping j-dams in a civilian marketplace to get his ``target``, totally un-Islamic answer, more in tune with the Crusader Version of Islam...




hmmm 5:32 doesn`t say much about ``collateral damage`` now does it?.......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#83 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 11:48:25 am
Re: # 82

Since I am not allowed to qualify my answer, I think the simple answer that she would give would be no. I think she would chose a specific target with an expected and anticipated number of collateral damage.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#82 Posted by bjkumar on June 1, 2007 11:41:15 am

#81 Urstruly

Sir, clearly your mom was a kind-hearted and conscientious lady, based on what you describe. Now please answer the following question and I will appreciate a simple ``yes`` or ``no``.

Would your mom approve of individuals wrapping themselves with explosives, entering crowds of strangers who have done her no harm and blowing up herself with them?!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#81 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 11:34:29 am
Re: # 75

There is absolutely no doubt that Petrodollars have contributed immensely in lifting the status of Muslims politically around the globe. But there are other factors too. I remember when I was a kid, in 70s, every evening close to the dusk pupils from the near by madrassa used to come to our house to gather food for the night. They used to go to almost every house in the street and asked for food; at some places they would get it and at others they didn`t. My mother always used to keep two chappatis and a plate of curry for them even before giving us the food - meaning that she never gave them the left overs but the first take from the freshly cooked food.. And I don`t remeber one single day when she had missed on her duty. Same is true for my grandmother and other aunts and many neighbors and people I know.

Once a group of students knocked at the door and asked for the ``Wazeefa`` (roughly translated as scholarship), which was the word used by the students and all those who used to donate. I opened the door and told my mom that Hafiz Jee have come for their ``Khairaat`` (alms). My mom became very indignant at the use of this word and told me to always use the word ``Haq`` or ``Wazeefa`` because it is the `right` of those students and it is our duty towards them. Similarly an uncle of mine, whose sons left country for employment in greener pastures a couple of decades ago, vowed that as long as he lived the students of the neighboring madrassa would never ever go out and ask for Wazeefa. He has kept his promise and supported the madrassa for decades now; he always kept his support secret in the traditional Muslim way.

The madrassas in subcontinent have only survived for the past 150 years because of the support of the society. British confiscated the trusted properties of all schools and madrassas in subcontinent right after 1857. These properties, renatl and agricultural, used to be the source of income for those madrassas since the time they were established when Muslims came to the Hindustan.

Saudis have contributed hugely around the globe in the revival and spread of Islam - just the way a Muslim is supposed to do. We must give credit where it is due. But despite that petrodollar is only a recent phenomenon and cannot be assigned as the only reason that madrassas exist.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#80 Posted by masadi on June 1, 2007 11:21:50 am
tahmed writes <<< we will be spared the dangerous fascism that military rule has spawned in Pakistan. >>>

Not until the hypocritical ``land of the free and the home of the brave`` continues to be interested in this region...which will be for quite a long time given their ``war without a forseeable end-part2`` The Pakistan Army dominant as an institution in Pakistan is quite subordinate to the US elite and the ``fascism`` that this snake talks about, this army does not spread going contrary to the desires of the US elite, rather it spreads it when spreading it is mutually beneficial both to its masters, i.e. the US elite and itself as dogs that collect crumbs from their master`s table: during Zia`s era, the US supported what they referred to as the ``freedom fighters`` while pushing the ``crusader version`` of Islam as something noble and admirable, this distortion was avidly embraced by the illiterate mullahs whose ``Islam`` is the crusader`s Islam, like damn fools, and now the same US elite fight the Frankenstein (the crusader caricature of Islam brought to life) of its own creation as legitimation for thier own higher terrorism, mass murder and global robbery.

And your role, you snake, you miserable excuse for a human being, tahmed, is to cover up the facts (the true meaning of Kaafir), white wash the real crimes of the real criminals and like this doctor PH, present half truths, detached from their real sources. Go to hell, that is the destination of hypocrites like you.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#79 Posted by arjun2 on June 1, 2007 10:59:55 am
maulana urstruly....shouldn`t you consider yourself warned?

Pakistan`s army warns opposition

Pakistan`s top army commanders say there is a ``malicious campaign`` against institutions of the state by a small minority of vested interests.

The army warning comes amid a growing challenge to President Musharraf`s decision to suspend the chief justice of the Supreme Court.

The move has galvanised opposition to the rule of Gen Musharraf, who is the head of the army.

Meanwhile, two TV channels have had their live broadcasts suspended.

The stations are among those that have given considerable coverage to the issues around the suspension of the chief justice, Iftikhar Chaudhry.

Obstructionist forces

The top army commanders issued their warning at a meeting of corps commanders in Rawalpindi.

News organisations, particularly Pakistan`s growing TV news networks, have come under government pressure to tone down their coverage of the protests.

Two private TV channels have now been prevented from live broadcasting after making alleged criticisms of the army and judiciary.

Aaj and ARY One World rely on cable operators who have said that the country`s broadcasting regulator has ordered them to cut the feeds for the two channels.

On Thursday Pakistan`s information minister warned that the government would strictly enforce media laws forbidding criticism of the army and the judiciary.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#78 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 10:21:10 am
Urtruly

LOL...this is the trouble we will always run into :). Pantheism and monotheism (strict and liberal), again mean completely different things to a believing Muslim (like you) than to a believing Hindu (like me) and that`s ok. Also, Sufism (in addition to the sword) no doubt was the greatest tool in the hands of Muslims in dealing with Hindus, but it hardly seems enough to live as a Muslim, if I have any idea of what Islam is.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#77 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 9:40:45 am
Re: # 74

This argument based on ``Dualism`` was the greatest tool in the hands of early sufis who had a dialogue with Pantheist hindu society in their time. The sufi concept of Wahdut-ul-Wajood (All-in-One), as espoused by early sufis made Hindu population very comfortable with the new religion. I think the trouble starts when new inventions in the religion (Islam) threatened the purity of its uncompromising stance on Monotheism; which occured a few centuries later.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#76 Posted by rf786 on June 1, 2007 9:32:27 am
Re: # 69

Both.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#75 Posted by rf786 on June 1, 2007 9:30:10 am
Re: # 54

Urstruly

{1. Since Sufi-ism does not have a political face and does not believe in such endeavors either, therefore, it suits their agenda. }

Janissaries were organized under rich sufi traditions as the elite fighting unit.

{2. The concept of ``social responsibility`` in Sufi-ism is actively discouraged (not to mention in clear defiance of Quranic edict ``forbid evil and enjoin good`` (Amr bil ma`aroof wa nahi un-el-munkir). Instead monasticism and individualism is encouraged in Sufi-ism with a strong emphasis on meaningless rituals and isolationism. These are the key ingredients that cultivate the apathy for social responsibility and ultimately causes the destruction of social institutions.}

Not true.

{But I do not see it as a threat to the global Islamic revolution and rennaissance which has now become an inevitability. The reason is that when they push an apolitical sufi-ism to counter a very political Islam, the former absolutely cannot fight the later on its own turf; instead the former has to become inevitably political to fight political Islam. Political Islam is light years ahead ideologically and socially as compared to sufi-ism in this regard. But the interesting thing is that, as the sufi-ism becomes political to counter Islam, it itself have to take social responsibility; it itself has to reject monsticism, individualism and the business of mind control through meaningless ritulas.}

Political Islam that u speak of is basically PETRO-DOLLAR Islam, take away their petro-dollars and se how quickly their politics evaporates. In Pakistan case, the state had resorted to wahabi or salafi Islam simply because it suited their political, military and financial needs. One has to compare number of madaris that were available in 1977 and at the end of 1999, petro-dollar had changed the entire landscape. But that has not yet changed the basic demographics of Sindh or Punjab, dominant provinces.

Same phenomena occured in rest of the world as petro-dollars bought more Islamic centres and more importantly marginalizes all other Islamic viewpoints. Thus may have started as the Saudi effort to neutralize Shia resurgence but has managed to radicalize many western urban muslims and thise if Asia.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#74 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 9:21:17 am
Urstruly, agreed entirely. This is the one point some of us (mostly me, unfortunately) have been trying to hammer home for eons it seems.

There are two completely different ways of looking at the world, of evaluating things as evil or good. Essentially, the perfect good of one is the perfect evil of the other, and vice versa. Nothing big, just two totally incompatible modes of human living and human socializing, sufism and such temporary nonsense (or good sense) notwithstanding. And that`s how we have any hope of knowing both of them.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#73 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 9:09:24 am
kalchakra

``But urstruly, if one can get children early enough, one can make them do a lot worse than turn them into an ideological fighting force... ``

This is an absolutely valid point of view. But an equally valid point of view would be ``what to do with the war orphans? leave them at the mercy of elements and let them figure out a way to survive or would it be better to send them to institutions where they are cared, educated, and turned into productive members of society``

I guess it really matters which side you are on - some will view it as an absolute evil while others will see it as a great act of humanity.

Without taking sides and considering war orphans as the most vulnerable victims of war I would say that saving them is better than leaving them to fend for themselves.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#72 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 9:02:41 am

Chowk Staff:

Please un-ban echoboom. His continued suspension is not only ridiculous but quite mean as well.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#71 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 9:02:20 am
Urstruly sahib,

True. Alif Saani, Ali Hajweri, and Moinuddin Chishti were all great Muslims, at least many orders of magnitude better than every chowki who is convinced that he or she has figured out a new interpretation.

More hilarious is how most Hindus even today continue to think of these great gentlemen as very much like their own sadhus. :)

But urstruly, if one can get children early enough, one can make them do a lot worse than turn them into an ideological fighting force...


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#70 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 1, 2007 8:59:39 am
#45 Tahmed420 {``And in Pakistan, as Churchill would have said: Never have so few taken so much from so many!! ``}

Winston Churchill was Chacha`s favorite PM. He loves to quote the cigar-chewing politician and one of his favorite quotes from Churchill is ``It will be long, it will be hard, and it will be bloody.`` :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#69 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 8:59:16 am
#67 by rf786,

So which one were you talking about ... Janissars or the Khaksars? :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#68 Posted by rf786 on June 1, 2007 8:56:46 am
Re: # 57

Close very close, Alama Mashriqi practised sufi traditions unlike the current day narrow minded wahabi Islam.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#67 Posted by rf786 on June 1, 2007 8:50:27 am
Re: # 56

Sarcasm only exposes your discomfort in accepting the truth, then again its something u have mastered :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#66 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 8:49:52 am
Re: # 58

Kaalchakra

Your contention regarding Janissaries as ``abducted chritian children`` is not correct. The Janissaries had many members of its fighting force that also constituted the war orphans, that included both Muslim and Chritian children, who were raised at government sponsored cadet college type institutions. It is quite illogical to think that you can build a formidable ideological elite fighting force with abdtuctees.


There is absolutely no doubt about sufi-ism`s part in the spread of Islam in the subcontinent. But those sufis were different from what sufi-ism has become today. That was the sufi-ism of Mujadid Alif Saani, Ali Hajweri, and Moinuddin Chishti who made efforts in the way of Allah to spread the message of Monotheism and not ritual. Mujadid Alif Saani challenged the emperor tyrrant of his time and suffered at his hands. Islam is more than ritual, occult, and monasticism. Logically, it is impossible to sit in a monastry and spread a religion; yes you can create a cult using mind control rituals but can`t spread a religion that becomes the way of life of a significant part of society.

Today millions of ritualistic ``sufis`` believe in sufi saints because they saw their parents doing the same. But the sufis of early era in subcontinent did not have that advantage of preaching the convert. They had to talk to people of other religions, convince them, and show them by example the path to One God. It needs effort and patience of angels. There is no miracle that convinces people but the miracle of conviction. Conviction needs effort.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#65 Posted by aslam644 on June 1, 2007 8:49:38 am
Re: # 52
Tahmed

I still give the credit to labour party for being one of the first in the world to introduce welfare state and me being beneficiary of that, being the first in my family to go on to university,paid an allowance as well.

I agree with you that things did go a bit pear shape due to powerful unions, but nothing that couldn’t be rectified.

I still admire some of their achievements, you must remember some of UK’s cities were flattened by german bombers, it was a huge task for labour party to rebuild, they built whole new garden towns for workers
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#64 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 8:43:04 am
An excellent iLog by Echoboom. Chowk-staff can you stop filtering him please? Thanks:

June 1, 2007

Bulleyaa et al & some other genuinely naive do-gooders.

``NaheeN raha haram-e dil meiN ikk sanam baaqui
tiray khayaal kay Laat-O-Manaat* kee soGund**``.........FAIZ

tr: Not a single idol is there anymore, even in the deepest sanctum of my heart
Swear do I hereby! By the sub-conscious of Your Laat & Manaat.``

* two pre-islamic feminine deity idols inside Ka`aba
** TaiTh hindi: for Qasam..Oath/swearing-in

This resurrection of Bulleh Shah & a reincarnation of the Bhakti movement and a sincere but misdirected desire to bring in Din-e-Ilahi is nothing but a fear of losing the comfortable-cocoons of a Colonised mindset. Achieving a Radical and revolutionary change (for who would not agree that Pakistan really needs a major over-haul ) and hoping not to put anything at stake is like trying to wish for big lottery winnings without even investing in buying a ticket.

This convoluted & perverted desire to ``adapt`` Islam to local soil is coming from those who still are lullibied, in english nursey-rhymes of-course, to sleep by their convented mothers and by their Un-Covenanted fathers.

Pakistani Military & Civil Service is nothing but a grand-incestous orgy & it is not only for their own perverted pleasure & good. They perform! for their goraa saab. And for a price much less than the customer would have been willing to pay. Like a Piranah feeding-frenzy this Paki elite is merrily raping 95% of Muslims & at the same time have offered their own bung-holes to the farangi on CREDIT!...IF they are ZALEELED in english..it is an honour.

A visual of Generals & Civil servants, pants down , raping the nation & behind them their goraa-masters getting the two-for-one deal would complete the picture of this derailed State.

It is only derailed, it has never failed & it shall never be allowed to fail...by the FUNDAMENTALISTS, by the MULLAHS & BY ISLAMISTS ( good words , use them often..if the enemy thinks so they MUST be good)

*(para censored as could be against chowk`s mysterious ``guidelines`` ... don`t want to get banned as well by the chowk`s obviously tilted editorial policy)*

``Teray azaar kaa chaaraa naheeN Nishtar kay sivaa``.........FAIZ

tr:Nothing short of a Surgeon`s Lance is a remedy for your diseased-mind.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#63 Posted by arjun2 on June 1, 2007 8:38:27 am
#44 by mohar11 on June 1, 2007 6:09am PT


liberals, mullahs, elites, abduls - everybody was wet-dreaming


Yup..it was like bell bottoms...pakis did it at the time but now want us to forget about it...unlike bell bottoms that only leave behind embarrassing photos, their dalliance in islamic jihad has left a deep gash up their butts where their posterior orifice used to be...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#62 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 8:36:20 am
malik sahib

Sheikh Sirhindi was a knowledgeable Muslim. He was not a charasi or a Hindu trying to pass off before others as a Muslim. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#61 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on June 1, 2007 8:29:44 am
#45 {``And in Pakistan, as Churchill would have said: Never have so few taken so much from so many!! ``}

SO FEW = Pakistani elites, including feudals, military, and liberal ``elitists.``
SO MUCH = Almost 1/3 of Indian landmass, including lush farmland taken from evacuees
SO MANY = All of the 1.3 billion people of the sub-continent who suffered due to partition.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#60 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 8:26:20 am
Darn, #58 gives the impression that the janissary phenomenon was repeated in India too. That wasn`t the case! Sorry!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#59 Posted by engr_malik on June 1, 2007 8:22:24 am
Remember Mujadad Alf-Sani(Sheikh ahmed sirhindi) and Imam Shamil
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#58 Posted by KaalChakra on June 1, 2007 8:19:47 am
``fail to make a connection between the political Islam and Janissaries or lack thereof.``

As in India, ``sufism`` was the gateway (Muslims used to route abducted Christian children) into the fold of Islam.

Thus sufism has served a useful purpose. But is Sufism itself Islam? And will it survive as a dominant force in West Punjab? Hard to say...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#57 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 8:18:40 am
Re: # 56

If Allam Inayat ullah Mashriqi (my political idol) was a sufi then I must be the queen of England.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#56 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 8:12:51 am
#54 by Urstruly,

Perhaps the gentleman is talking about the Khaksars of Allama Mashriqi ... ;)

(Ooh being polite about this ignoramus is so painful ... )
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#55 Posted by echoboom on June 1, 2007 8:06:33 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#54 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 8:03:03 am
Re: # 53

I do not understand your contention and especially the reference made to Ottoman Caliphate army`s elite fighting unit. I also fail to make a connection between the political Islam and Janissaries or lack thereof.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#53 Posted by rf786 on June 1, 2007 7:54:30 am
Re: # 48

Urstruly

Read your note on Sufi Islam and comparison with political Islam ie WAHABI, I have just one word for your ignorance...JANISSARIES.

Had you any knowledge of Islamic/Middle Eastern history you would not have made that outlandish statement, but then again people like u r the product of ``Islam for dummies`` guide with no understanding or knowledge of history.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#52 Posted by tahmed32 on June 1, 2007 7:33:57 am
#51 aslam: the ``moderate leftist revolution`` resulted in UK being turned into the ``Sick Man of Europe`` as it came to be known in the 1960`s, not the ``fair and equitable society`` that you mention. It was not until that ``revolution`` was overturned by the Thatcher government which through denationalization made British industry competitive again.

What we need in pakistan is not any ``ism`` but law and order, starting at the top. The cjp`s leadership in this matter is the best hope for the long run benefit of Pakistan. While no doubt there will always be a fringe luncatics of all kind in Pakistan as in other countries (religious, ethnic extremists), we will be spared the dangerous fascism that military rule has spawned in Pakistan.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#51 Posted by aslam644 on June 1, 2007 7:15:57 am
What Pakistan needs is a moderate leftist revolution, something akin to uk labour party’s after ww2, which defeated war hero Churchill with a slogan a country fit for heroes, with decent housing, schools, hospitals. The rich and the middle class fled to Australia and US, fearing the country would go to dogs, of course nothing of the sort happened the country rose from the ashes as a fair and equitable society.

BTW here is the good part, labour party built 5million houses and the US paid for it.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#50 Posted by khurram on June 1, 2007 7:09:59 am
Re #39, bulleya

What are political dimensions of Sufi Islam? Is there any?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#49 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 7:04:11 am

As a matter of fact the very first copies of internet editions of urdu newspapers published the pictures of this particular protest by lawyers. In one of the pictures the effigy is Musshrraf is shown in full full military uniform with papar cut medals and all and a face cutout of dictator`s face stuck to the head of the effigy. The effigy also was wearing that funny little tinpot hat that Pakistani generals wear. The most intriguing part however was that that effigy had a noose around its neck and one of the lawyer was hitting the effigy with his peshawari chappal.

The picture was censored with in half an hour of its publishing:

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#48 Posted by Urstruly on June 1, 2007 6:49:08 am

I do not think that a currupt Westernized munafiq and kafir ruling elite has any affinity for the ``Sufi-ism`` per se, but they only favor it for three reasons:

1. Since Sufi-ism does not have a political face and does not believe in such endeavors either, therefore, it suits their agenda. One less challenger to their iron fisted corrupt oppressive rule the better. In return they get a social class who is indifferent to their own social plight; what is better than that.

2. The concept of ``social responsibility`` in Sufi-ism is actively discouraged (not to mention in clear defiance of Quranic edict ``forbid evil and enjoin good`` (Amr bil ma`aroof wa nahi un-el-munkir). Instead monasticism and individualism is encouraged in Sufi-ism with a strong emphasis on meaningless rituals and isolationism. These are the key ingredients that cultivate the apathy for social responsibility and ultimately causes the destruction of social institutions. Kafirs and Munafiques see it as a positive since they do not see any challenge to their nefarious attempts at destroying family structure and promoting vices that weaken the moral uprightness of a society.

3. They promote an apolitical sufi-ism as a counter-measure to a very political Islam; which they refer to as radical Islam or wahabism etc. (Their use of semantics is very important here, since that forms the basis of their didvide and rule tactic. )

But I do not see it as a threat to the global Islamic revolution and rennaissance which has now become an inevitability. The reason is that when they push an apolitical sufi-ism to counter a very political Islam, the former absolutely cannot fight the later on its own turf; instead the former has to become inevitably political to fight political Islam. Political Islam is light years ahead ideologically and socially as compared to sufi-ism in this regard. But the interesting thing is that, as the sufi-ism becomes political to counter Islam, it itself have to take social responsibility; it itself has to reject monsticism, individualism and the business of mind control through meaningless ritulas.

So my challenge to all kafirs and munafiques is to go ahead and get the sufis out of their monastries and cocoons of individualitism and rat holes of superstition. You are doing Islam a favor.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#47 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 6:13:56 am
#45 by tahmed32,

Sir, read the book first. Don`t be ensnared with indian propaganda.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#46 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 6:11:18 am
#39 by bulleya is right. If a ballot was held on this basis, the sufis will win anytime. But the point is, Jihadis do not believe in one man-one vote ballots in the first place, rather selection from those `best in deeds`, and sufis are by far not that. They`re mostly hedonists under the pretense of being ascetic. One example is Mian Yousuf Salahuddin who has been assigned the task of promoting sufis as the `real` face of Islam in Pakistan, and who is a famed randi baaz of Lahore.

Besides, Jihadis rely on guns to achieve what they want, while sufis rely on Dhols and bhang and inane chanting.

And believe me, I too have an extended experience with a very popular Pir named ``Baba Kaki Tarrh`` or Baba girl-watcher. Amongst his devotees were Nayyara Noor, Nighat Choudhery and Shahida Perveen :)

(P.S. There are now some shrines of Usama Bin Laden`s `Companions` in Waziristan about whom it is said crawled on their bellies all the way down from Tora Bora avoiding drones :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#45 Posted by tahmed32 on June 1, 2007 6:10:36 am
further to #43: Its about money, stupid. Not islam, not ethnicities. a rupee does not have any religion, and does not care about ethnicities.

And in Pakistan, as Churchill would have said: Never have so few taken so much from so many!!

the basic rights of Pakistanis to peace and security and schools for their children have been sacrificed for what? those seeking money and power!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#44 Posted by mohar11 on June 1, 2007 6:09:18 am
Re: # 40

It`s true that - had pakiland not signed up for US-backed afgan jihad, it would have been better place today... but then nobody really said anything at that time... pakis were pleasuring themselves at the prospect of having the ``strategic depth``... and then there was the kashmir banega pakiland wet dream... liberals, mullahs, elites, abduls - everybody was wet-dreaming... nobody said a word... nobody objected to that line of national thinking and making hate and obsession was national pastime... nobody warned about consequences of such destructive course of action...

Now that the inevitable destruction has happened, pakis are suddenly acting so intellectual, with all sorts of wisdom dripping out :).... romair is talking about ``natural course`` of events... well, too late buddy, after decades of willful destruction of native culture in favor of bedouinism and after discarding civilized way of living, there is no such thing called ``natural course`` left for you to follow...

the ``strategic depth`` is now on your own a$$... the depth that is being plumbed by afgans, talibans, arabs and all sorts of other riff-raff... enjoy :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#43 Posted by tahmed32 on June 1, 2007 5:57:19 am
Would reading this book mean insulting Musharraf ben Walid (RAW)?

Book on military’s business empire launched

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#42 Posted by Folio on June 1, 2007 5:53:50 am
#24 by Mantolives on May 31, 2007 10:12pm PT

I was expecting u to post the big stuff on Gandhi and his South African days. I am a bit disappointed :-(

Anyway I appreciate ur near-normal tone and msg.

Now wud ur national broadcaster stop saying that Pakistan is celebrating its Independence Day on 14th Aug? I hope it wont. Never mind.

I am watching a lot of Pak channels now-a-days. To me ur media is the silver lining in otherwise a clouded country.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#41 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 5:49:15 am
#38 by majumdar,

.... the shrine of the dhol beating/whirling sufis ... but google.com will enlighten you more :)

... or another option ... since bulleya mentioned ``Data darbar still gets millions of visitors........`` perhaps they could all get together and make a `mannat` (pledge to the Pir if their wish is fulfilled) to let all Jihadis disappear and they will distribute a billion rotis from outside data darbar ... :)

You see, the difference is the Jihadis do things in the path of Allah for nothing in return, while Sufis ask their Pirs to even get their daughters married off or a male offspring ...

(No offense to our Sufi brothers of-course)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#40 Posted by Ally on June 1, 2007 5:36:30 am
go bulleya #39
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#39 Posted by bulleya on June 1, 2007 5:32:13 am
majumdar #34: ``Sufism will lose out to the Deobandi-Wahabi version of Islam for the same reason that liberalism will lose out to fundoos as per your analysis.``

.......It is pretty much impossible for Sufism (or its version of it in Pakistan) to lose out to Deobandi-Wahabi Islam, if things are allowed to follow their natural course in Pakistan.....There are only two ways in which it can lose out:

- If external events and the govt.`s reaction to it leads to situations where Deobandi-Wahabism gains more state influence....one example, is the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan......Another is the American invasion of Afghanistan........In both cases, the govt. wholeheartedly supported the Americans, and both have proved to be major successes for Deobandi-Wahabism in Pakistan.......In the first case, because they were made the warriors supporting the USA, and in the second because they have been the sole representative of the overwhelming view of the population and have taken the leadership against Pakistan joining the USA, so extensively........

- If Western liberalism and secularism is forced down the throats of Pakistanis.......In a counter-reaction, the Deobandi-Wahabi (actually Wahabism is still quite a bit outside mainstream Pakistan, so really Deobandi) groups will gain popularity as they will be the ones taking a stand against it.......Even in a place like Turkey, which has a strong history in its foundation of secularism and has a brainwashed military that pushes it and is quite a bit more Westernized than Pakistan, Western liberalism/secularism has not worked, and may have actually increased the popularity of the religious party now running it.......

You need to study the history of Sufism in Punjab and Sindh........Once you do, you will understand what I am saying.......Go to any of the Sufi shrines, when the urs is held........It is flooded with devotees........Every tiny city in Pakistan has a resident dead Sufi (some actually never even existed and were created).........How many Pakistani cities have shrines for dead theocrats?........

Infact, can you even name any famous theocrats who have come out of Punjab and Sind (and NWFP and Baluchistan for that matter).....Deoband and Wahabism centers aren`t even located in Pakistan.........There is a long list of Sufis from the area of Pakistan.......Bhitai, Sarmast, Sharaf, Qadri, Qalandar and so on........

The biggest hits in Pakistani music, till today (including even rock hits) were authored by these Sufis, centuries ago..........

Rest assured (and I am speaking with some level of authority on this subject) Mullah Umar has no chance in Pakistan against Bulleh Shah!.........Bulleh Shah will still be around thousand years from now in Punjab and portions of Sindh, they will be singing his Kafis in this areas to the latest techno instruments of the time, even in one thousand years........No one will know who Mullah Umar was (or Hoodbhoy for that matter)...........Because the ideas of Mullah Umar and Hoodbhoy (though well intentioned) are alien to the area........

Now if Pakistan keeps agreeing to become a frontline state for US wars and if Western ideas are shoved down Pakistanis throats, then Deobandism can rise........However, if a natural course of events is allowed, neither secularism nor Deobandism will ever establish itself in this area..........Maybe it should, maybe it shouldn`t.......But it won`t.......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#38 Posted by majumdar on June 1, 2007 5:23:11 am
Zeemax sahib,

Sorry since I am from India I didn`t get the drift. What is ``Baba Shah Jamal`` and who are Pappo Saeen and Goonga Saeen. And why wud fundoos oppose Jamia Hafsa?

Regards
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#37 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 5:10:28 am
#34 by majumdar, #32 by bulleya

True. Unless they make their HQ at Baba Shah Jamal to oppose Jamia Hafsa, and choose Pappoo Saeen and Goonga Saeen as their leaders. Just the charas smoke and that unbearable disjointed Dhol will make the Jihadis flee ... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#36 Posted by majumdar on June 1, 2007 5:10:09 am
Naqsh sahib,

(by patronising this version of real islam so that all senior religious posts are given to sufis and by being harsh on the wahabis.)

Have u considered the alternative possibility that MAJ(pbuh) and Manto mian may suggest- that the State not interfere in religious matters and create a non-sectarian state.

Besides, who decides what is ``real Islam`` if I may ask?

Regards

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#35 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 1, 2007 4:27:07 am
a good article about the rise and dangers of wahabism in pakistan. luckily most pakistanis--especially in punjab and sindh--are sunni muslims of the sufi-orientated barelvi tradition and despise wahabism and its various forms.

i think it is these moderate but practising traditionalist muslims of the sufi orders who can --and must--defeat the rise of wahabism. how can the state help? by patronising this version of real islam so that all senior religious posts are given to sufis and by being harsh on the wahabis.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#34 Posted by majumdar on June 1, 2007 3:40:38 am
Romair sahib,

Even if the fundoos get control of Pakistan they will be as clueless as the liberals. They will get divided on Sunni-Shia, Barelvi-Deobandi lines.

(Sufism is easy to push in Pakistan, because historically, this is what this part of the world )

Sufism will lose out to the Deobandi-Wahabi version of Islam for the same reason that liberalism will lose out to fundoos as per your analysis.

#1Deobandi-Wahabis will be willing to kill and get killed for their version of Islam while the sufis won`t bother doing so.
#3 Deobandi-Wahabis have a coherent ideology, they know what they want- Talibanistan, do the sufis know what they want?

It is only on your Point #2 that sufi version scores over Deobandis.

Regards

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#33 Posted by muqaddam on June 1, 2007 1:53:36 am
With every article Hood(lum) Bhai gets staider.
Over the last sixty years, initially the miltry and then the miltry-mulla combine have played havoc with the Pakistani state.
As it is, Pakistan as a country is an artificial creation with no history as a nation state, no real raison d`etre except common religious denomination of the population which in any case is is a grouping of disparate nationalities. Nothing has been learnt from the `71 debacle.
Any sane leadership would have put development of the country into a nation state on priority allowing federal democracy to flower.
But the M-M combine followed skewed policies and worked overtime to thrust shariah down the throats of the population which otherwise was quite comfortable with the Indian ethos with which it is at home.
`Hate India` has been the corner stone of Pakistan`s foreign policy, raising cain whenever there were disturbances involving Muslim population in India, discrediting India in all international fora , interfering in J&K. The biggest foreign policy blunder was Afghanistan (and Hamid Gul`s Taliban) policy, it has landed in the lap of Pakistan 3 million Afghan refugees who over the years have taken away a lot of jobs from its own citizens and will now refuse to go away, gained some sympathy and arms from the Mricans, only to be dumped by them when their purpose was served and who later even threatened to bomb Pakistan into stone age. The policy has also not taken Pakistan an inch closer to its avowed dream of annexing J&Kand has a new adversary on its Western border.
No wonder Pakistan is at crossroads, with few friends even among Muslim nations most of whom accuse Pakistan of being a source of terrorism that threatens their own states and even fewer friends among its own provinces.
However all is not lost. What is required is kicking out Mushy the NRI to the barracks, demullafying the body politic of the country and letting real democracy bloom.
India is such a diverse country, with several ethnic populations, different languages, different religions, mind boggling economic disparity, but what holds the country together is its strong democracatic fibre which allows the country to weather all storms, every time coming out more confident as a nation state. Maybe there is something to learn there for budding Pakistani politicians.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#32 Posted by bulleya on June 1, 2007 1:52:20 am
......I think people supporting a liberal agenda in Pakistan will always have problems in Pakistan, for the following reasons:

1. They are unwilling to come out into the streets in support of their ideas.....Any revolution of ideas, requires people coming out, with some of them willing to take some bullets........This is how all revolutionary ideas have come in.......

.......The conservative and religious right, in Pakistan, is willing to do the above in a second......Granted there are quite few who have migrated to the USA, and now fight hypocritical battles, from their keyboards......But a large group is still in Pakistan fighting it out in the streets.......

2. The liberals want to import Western liberal ideas into a society that is quite conservative and religious by Western standards........It is the equivalent of someone from Pakistan going to Belgium and pushing Shariah........Even if he had power, he couldn`t do it........Look at how much trouble Turkish military is having pushing Western secularism and liberalism in Turkey.....

.........Liberalism, in Pakistan, as I have always said will never be Canadian style liberalism........At best, it will be a sufi-style Islam.........That is what liberals should aim for.....Because that is a practical target that is achievable and is inline with the will of the common person.........Unfortunately, liberals like Western liberalism personally, and want to force it onto everyone, which irritates the population, due to which the population eventually rejects it........

3. Liberals don`t have a coherent political ideology........They don`t know what they want.......They are willing to support dictators (Musharraf), if they are liberal.........They are willing to support corrupt people (BB) if they are liberal......They don`t have a politcal party of their own, nor do they have the will to start one........

Conservatives and the religious right knows exactly what it wants.......They have strong political parties, which push their agenda.......They will force rulers to accept their agenda, rather than being dependent on rulers to push their agenda........

4. Liberals tend to distort facts........Dr. Hoodbhoy is no exception........I would say 33% of the content of his articles is generally the truth, 33% of it is lies, and 33% is a very subjective interpretation of the facts to match the ideas he has........This article is no exception.........For all the antics of Jamia Hafsa etc., they haven`t killed anyone........The most liberal and secular party in Pakistan (MQM) has now, allegedly, killed so many..........And has previously proven to have killed so many......How many people has Jamaat-e-Islami killed?......No cases against its leaders........While against the most liberal party in Pakistan, their are murder cases against one end of its leadership to the other........

However, the religious right gets a bashing in his articles, while MQM just merely gets one phrase of condemnation, ``ethno-fascist``.........

Solution:



Liberals need to address the above four issues, if they are to establish themselves at the grassroots........They need to create an independent political force of their own, and need to stop relying on the corrupt (BB) or the dictatorships (Musharraf) or the, ``ethno-fascist`` (Altaf) to push their agenda..........

They need to define an achievable goal.........Not secularism or Western style liberalism, but a sufistic Islam........If secularism and Western liberalism has failed in Turkey, how will it work in Pakistan?.......Sufism is easy to push in Pakistan, because historically, this is what this part of the world - Sind and Punjab - have supported......Data darbar still gets millions of visitors........Despite the efforts of theocrats to wipe out sufism, it thrives in Pakistan.......Unfortunately it does not have political representation............

They need to accept the history of Pakistan........It wasn`t some secular/liberal country, now distorted by mullahs.........It is what it is, and was what it was.......There is barely an iota of secularism/Western liberalism in its history and formation......Unlike Turkey........

And finally, they need stop fighting their wars on keyboards..........They need to get out into the streets............Much like the lawyers are doing........

Since liberals fail, hugely, on all four of the above, while the religious right passes, hugely, on three out of the above four (the fail on one, as they also distory history and facts), the religious right will always dominate the liberals............Liberals (like Dr. Hoodbhoy and others), at best will become disposable senators...........Qazi Hussein could one day be PM!.......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#31 Posted by zeemax on June 1, 2007 12:37:31 am
Fair enough attempt, though the Professor chorroo bhai as usual goes on with his islamophobic rants, factual errors, contradictions, conjectures and mere jumping from one branch to another like a macaca looking for some stick or something to stop the rise of Islam in Pakistan.

What I find most interesting, however, is nowhere does he mention the `people`, the `masses`, the `awam` etc. The status quo of oligarchies which has been ruling Pakistan since inception has failed to deliver even clean water to the `people`, let alone social justice or things like healthcare and basic education. Anyone who has an interaction with either the police or the lower judiciary or the revenue authorities ends up hating the system. So why should it be such a surprise or an anomaly if a movement is trying to replace that exploitative system?

The fact is, that the powerful and oligarchical liberal civil society in Pakistan must not oppose a soft revolution. In such an event, a hard one will be inevitable as I have been saying for a few months now.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#30 Posted by Zeena on June 1, 2007 12:15:38 am
Sorry for typos in my post # 29...

Please, read this paragraph as their basic problem is poverty(ignore lack of poverty)....LOL(Laughing at self for writing lack of povety instead of poverty), might be b/c it is an unconscious desire to see all those poor people as without this menace called poverty in near future....

[[Suppose we ban all Islamic parties , close down all the madrrasas in Pakistan......Will it solve all the problems in Pakistan? No absolutely NOT..b/c 80% of Pakistan`s population lives in villages and their basic problem is poverty, lack of education, lack of basic facilities(most of them do not even have shelters, food and clothes to wear), they are enslaved by feudal lords........ ]]]
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#29 Posted by Zeena on May 31, 2007 11:46:39 pm
This article is another attempt to disgrace Pakistani society at large. When I say,``disgrace``, it means that this article is another slap right on the faces of Pakistanis. This is another mockery made by the writer against religion which is not even practiced in it`s truest sense , if, it would have had been practices in it`s truest form, Pakistan would never be #1 corrupt country in the world.

It looks like the writer of this article has made it his life mission to ridicule Pakistani Muslims at any cost. The writer writes all these Muslim bashing articles and publish them here on chowk just to be read by the same readers over and over again.

What does the writer gets in return ? Nothing except few interactions, some against and some far.....and then tamasha ends...with some personal insults, cyber harassments, fights, gaali gaaloch......and then writer thin ks, oh, well, problems solved....

I believe in freedom of religion which is basic human right. Every human has the right to choose his/her own religion(belief, the way he/she wishes to practice) with out interruption from governance and other individuals.

In Pakistan , if majority of Pakistanis wishes to have an Islamic society, then who are we to criticize about their ways of lives?

If, people of NWFP and people of baluchistan have chosen any Islamic party , then who are we to interrupt and tell those people that they made the wrong choice?

It is their prerogative to vote for their favorite parties.....If, they choose PPP, Islamic Jamaat, Muslim league etc, etc....that`s their own decision and all we have to do is to respect their decision with the same attitude that we expect for ourselves from others.

I truly believe that Pakistan has NO threat from religious extremists. Pakistan`s main problem is, poverty, poverty and poverty......and then corruption, corruption, corruption.......

Suppose we ban all Islamic parties , close down all the madrrasas in Pakistan......Will it solve all the problems in Pakistan? No absolutely NOT..b/c 80% of Pakistan`s population lives in villages and their basic problem is lack of poverty, lack of education, lack of basic facilities(most of them do not even have shelters, food and clothes to wear), they are enslaved by feudal lords........

I have not seen any kind of Islam in it`s true sense in most of the villages.....and I have not even seen any radicalism in those villages either.

I saw extremists in Karachi, Lahore and then Rawalpindi....When I say extremists( it includes all kinds of extremists including non religious and religious)...............

Our problem here on chowk is we have become tunnel visioned and majority of us live in our own little toad`s world, and we ape west for everything blindly without having our independent thoughts.......now that it has become a fashion to blame Islam and Muslims for everything wrong.....If, Pakistan is corrupt country, blame Islam, if Pakistan is attacked by terrorists, blame Islam, if Pakistan is being bombarded with suicide bombers, blame Islam......and then use the word, ``radical<`` for every Muslims to make them look uglier and to be little them without even mentioning the real problems of pakistani society.....

We are little toads in our own little worlds without seeing anything beyond our own limited ponds.....that makes us much more ignorant....and funny thing is we thing we are smart arses............and that makes us more jackarses.....and we become a laughing stock for the rest of the world......

This article is full of hypocrisy and lies......except for one truth.....{{The freedom available to women in Pakistan has steadily shrunk over time, including the period of Musharraf’s rule. His attitudes on rape victims have outraged many women. On Musharraf’s orders, a gang-rape victim from Meerwalla village, Mukhtaran Mai, was disallowed from proceeding overseas lest she bring a bad name to Pakistan. Another rape victim, a woman doctor who described her assailant as an army officer, received harsh treatment from Musharraf who, in an interview to the Washington Post, dismissed her case by remarking: “A lot of people say if you want to go abroad and get a visa for Canada or citizenship and be a millionaire, get yourself raped.6” ]]]]

And the only reason this time I read this useless and senseless article and is responding is just because of this truth..............and I admire writer of this article for telling the truth first time ................it looks like writer`s heart might be in right place, but, his mind is always confused with his own clueless ideology..............I suggest this writer to keep working towards truthfulness................

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#28 Posted by majumdar on May 31, 2007 11:29:21 pm
HP Sain,

Re: #26

Well-written.

(Most of the problems in Pakistan undeniably start from the army hegemony over the state. This is the real issue in Pakistan.Since people opening these backdoor channels are denied or are away from the mainstream, they end up becoming hardliners or take up arms to support their political demands. )

Very correct.

(With the heinous suicide bombing becoming an important weapon)

Yes, forget about guns, even f-16s, Gauris, Shaheens and nukes wud be useless against this type of weaponry.

(it will attempt to divert the protests away from itself and create one or more diversionary issues. )

Divide and rule.

Regards

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#27 Posted by HP on May 31, 2007 11:26:43 pm
#24 by Mantolives

Let us not hijack this issue to Jinnah vs. Gandhi but I must add my two cents to correct the perception here.

It was a legal necessity to announce Pakistan’s independence before the Indian independence. On 14th of August, Pakistan became an independent country from the British rule. Had India was given the sovereignty first, Pakistan would have had to rely on India to declare Pakistan an independent state instead of the Brits. This is a legal technicality and had to be resolved in this manner. The difference perhaps was just a few hours and Jinnah was right in calling 15th of August as the first Day of independence in Pakistan.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#26 Posted by HP on May 31, 2007 11:16:25 pm

I wish Dr. PH has broken this article down in to three or four articles dealing with issues in much more coherent manner. He has tried to bring in every thing under the sun from the Pakistan going the Iran way to the crisis in FATA along with the situation in Islamabad. This really is not the right way to approach the issues facing Pakistan. He clearly is a patriotic Pakistani and perhaps he sat down and tore his heart out in this article. The passion and his ability to chronicle the problems is admirable. He knows what the issues are but unfortunately, he dwells too much on the issues and not on the solutions.

Some issues are just subset of a few major issues. Most of the problems in Pakistan undeniably start from the army hegemony over the state. This is the real issue in Pakistan. The Army created a culture in Pakistan where it handled oppositions and political parties either by frightening them or by coercing them into partnership. The political parties or the politicians not coerced were dealt with severally and eventually army created a class of politicians that lacked the ability to formulate a political program to snatch the power back from the army. Instead, these politicians look to find ways to share power with the army. Sometimes they do get to share the power but as the civilian politicians grow in stature, the army shunts them out or puts them back in place fairly easily.

The dilemma Pakistan faces now is that the political parties lack the will to firmly stand against the army. However, the political dynamism continues to force changes and when the legitimate channels are blocked, some backdoor channels open up. Since people opening these backdoor channels are denied or are away from the mainstream, they end up becoming hardliners or take up arms to support their political demands.

The militant that Pakistan army itself created during the afghan crisis now demand a place in Pakistani political power structure. The army is now caught in a situation where both sides of the aisle, the moderate politicians and the militants, are demanding a share in power. The army cannot cede its power to any of these groups. So it goes back and forth with these two groups to find support. Sometimes it talks with the moderates and the other times it makes alliance with the extremists.

Had it been the 70s or the 80s, the army would have acted and destroyed both groups forcibly. Seeing the vulnerability of the Baloch tribes and the Baloch militants the army was quick to pounce on them just a couple of years ago but when it tried to use the same power in the tribal areas of NWFP it met with enough force to immediately back out of there. The war in Afghanistan weaponized the Pakistani politics. Now, it is not easy for the army to destroy its opposition with force alone.

The police force that was able to disperse the crowds using batons and tear gas in the 70s and 80s, now cannot even dare those tactics against this new breed of political agitators and protesters who carry automatic weapons openly and have no hesitation in using them against the state law enforcement agencies. As we saw in Wana, the opponents matched army’s fire with equal or better equipment. With the heinous suicide bombing becoming an important weapon, the army practically has no chance of subduing the opponents without suffering great loses itself.

One reason the army encouraged the MQM on May 12th was its knowledge that the other groups would be ready to fire back on the state law enforcing agencies and the police, Rangers and the army would be battered in street clashes. So, the use of MQM was to save the state power from embarrassment and was used to turn the issue a power struggle between the two or more civilian groups. Even though in reality the CJ procession in Karachi was supposed to be against the army rule in Pakistan.

The question then is: if the army is hesitant to use the force against the protesters, especially the lawyers and the other middle class groups, it will attempt to divert the protests away from itself and create one or more diversionary issues.

Imran and Altaf tiff is a good example of creating diversions. Though Imran is not wrong in saying what he said about Altaf, but he has no stature in Karachi politics so the MQM reaction to the whole thing was really over the top. The headlines grabbing reaction by the MQM became a reason for people to react in Punjab and elsewhere, whereas the focal issue should have been the lawyers struggle led by Chaudhry Aitzaz.

I guess I am catching the Dr. PH bug… this is already too long. More on this later…


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#25 Posted by majumdar on May 31, 2007 10:58:58 pm
Manto mian,

Was it true that in the said speech (14/8/47) MAJ (pbuh) switched from English to Urdu for his last words (Pakistan Zindabad) and people thought he had said ``Pakistan`s in the bag``

Regards
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#24 Posted by MantoLives on May 31, 2007 10:12:12 pm
Dear Folio,

You expect wrong as usual. This is a point I have brought up many times. Also Jinnah`s first radio address on the morning of the 15th says it very clearly: ``15th August is the birthday of the dominion of Pakistan`` (interestingly - Dina Wadia`s birthday is also 15th August) ...

The correct legal position is that Pakistan became independent on the 15th of August 1947.
However... this is hardly the issue since the official handing-over ceremony by Lord Mountbatten took place on 14th and not the 15th and I suspect that is what is being commemorated on the 14th.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#23 Posted by bjkumar on May 31, 2007 8:30:37 pm

This sober write-up is truly an eye-opener for me! I do not like to believe in pessimism yet to say that I am dismayed is an absolute understatement.

With Pakistani “patriots” like the Mushy – who needs enemies?! If he were not such a coward as well as the isolated ignoramus that he has become, he would be able to read a bit of history and realize that nobody – read NOBODY – in history anywhere in the world has been able to make political use of fundamentalists without eventually paying a heavy price!

The thing about the likes of the Bin Ladens of the world is – sadly, they are most popular among people who understand such people the least!

The bottom line is – if the Pakistani population at large wants Shariat – it will get its wish. However, then the consequences would be inevitable, too – at minimum, sanctions by the USA and perhaps other countries.

What would follow could easily become a nightmare for the next whole generation.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#22 Posted by Chennai on May 31, 2007 6:55:27 pm
“We think that men could derive sexual pleasure from women`s bodies while conducting ECG or ultrasound,7” proclaimed Maulana Gul Naseeb Khan, provincial secretary of the MMA.

Careful brother, they run the risk of ``erotic electrocution``, a fatal disease............
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#21 Posted by anil on May 31, 2007 5:03:12 pm
Professor sahib:

Pakistani identity is more in Islam than in any democratic institution or process. Whereas Pakistani mind, reading at Chowk for all these years, is clearly elsewhere. Clearly, when they vote their heart, it is Islam, and when they vote their mind, it is non-Islamic parties, a strange dichotomy. At least Palestinians had been honest and voted Hezbollah to power.

Or is it in denial? The society is helpless to stop the regression. “…Across the country there has been a spectacular increase in the power and prestige of the clerics…” are alarmist statements, which have no impact whatsoever. It there a “Sooya Hua Pakistani”? Again relying on Chowk, other than Jinnah or Koran there is no consensus on what is “Sooya Hua Pakistani”.

Any expert in economics will readily point out the Pakistani economy is not based on economic value addition, unless you call terrorism as the economic value addition. The economy requires more external inputs than it produces with Pakistani value addition.
Hafsa drama, at an educational and religious institutions of this kind, and Talebanbaazi are cruel jokes, if Prophet Mohammad somehow descend today to be the witness of what his followers are doing, he would be very sad. He for one would never agree to take the law and order back to 7th century, and ignore the advancement of knowledge.

How many minds will be wasted, and not allowed to dream and do, just because of this struggle of mind and heart of Pakistan?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#20 Posted by Folio on May 31, 2007 4:39:19 pm
Dear Kaalachakra,

Though I dont wnt to hijack the debate here, the 14th August 1947 is a colossal fraud being perpetrated by the Govt of Pakistan on the people of Pakistan.

Though the flag hoisting was done on 14th Aug in Karachi, India (legally it was part of India on that day), Independence Day was celabrated on 15th August in 1948, 49, 50 & 51 (till Liaqat`s death) in Karachi, Pakistan. I didnt read much after that.

Plz consider this: How Pakistan became independent when India Independence Act came into force on 15th August? So deceit is an in-built nature in the state of Pakistan. As a legal eagle Jinnah knew this but symbolic handover of power was allowed to be made from Christians to Muslims than from Hindus to Muslims.

(I expect Mantolives to come forward raising his fist)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#19 Posted by KaalChakra on May 31, 2007 4:09:27 pm
Somehow, the idea that Islamization in Pakistan (or Indianization in India) threatens anything seems far fetched. All that`s going to happen is that both these countries will find their natural rhythms. 14/15th Augusts, 1947 were great days but they didn`t set our respective destinies in stone.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#18 Posted by paradox on May 31, 2007 3:40:14 pm
If islam is what people want than be it but the issue is WHICH BRAND OF ISLAM. I am sure if Mullahs of every sect are asked to decide which SHIRIAH they want they would end up calling each other KAFIR or end up killing each other.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#17 Posted by Folio on May 31, 2007 2:40:11 pm
and treating them as employees.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by Folio on May 31, 2007 2:34:06 pm
Arjun,

Yeah....u r right.

This reminds me of `camel and the tent` story. The camel (Army) edged out the real occupant (elected politicians).

With such deep hands in economic interests, it`s nigh-impossible to put Army in its place i.e making them apolitical and treating them employees.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by arjun2 on May 31, 2007 2:29:10 pm
#12 by Folio on May 31, 2007 12:52pm PT

for losing 4 wars, the paki army rewards itself with the keys to the state treasury...no wonder pakiland doesn`t produce any corporate powerhouses..the mediocre military businesses edge them out...

they lost in kargil and rewarded themselves by taking over pakiland...reinforcing failure, as ayaz amir calls it..
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by Folio on May 31, 2007 2:23:09 pm
HP,

When u r not kidding u write in MB Naqvi`s style i.e no non-sense analyses.

U can even try ur hand at writing articles. OR was it that u are - like a food taster - a good commentator???
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by HP on May 31, 2007 1:50:11 pm

Dr. Sahib is correct in pointing out that 25 years of incessant Islamic propaganda through various mediums has taken its toll. I would also like to point out that moderates in Pakistan have fought hard during that time too.

From 1988 to 1998, almost four elections were held in Pakistan but none of those elections resulted in majority for the fundamentalists’ parties. Nawaz league is more to the right than the PPP. The Nawaz league relied on alliances with various groups to win elections but the election successes was not due to fundamentalist parties.

The fundamentalists won in 2002 and only in Pukhtoon Majority areas.

Just look at the current election scenarios. Is there any possibility of fundamentalists winning elections in Sindh, Punjab or in Balochistan? True, the MMA shares govt. in Balochistan but the Provincial government can be run without their participation.

I don’t know why people keep insisting that the Hafsa issue should have been dealt with the state power. I have commented on this before and I would again say that using force against the Hafsa nonsense would have been a grave mistake. In countries like Pakistan, state oppression or state’s show of force actually establishes the credentials of political groups. If the State had gone full press ahead with the Hafsa group, they would have become legitimate. Now, instead, we see they barely have any support anywhere in Pakistan.

The whole Hafsa drama was created for the state to react. Dr. Sahib understands that. Now watch how the same group has brought Imam Kaaba to provide some boost to dwindling support for the Islamic parties.


I had mentioned in my posts in March that Musharaf handled the CJ situation badly. I am glad that the Pak govt is finally coming around to accepting this and have accepted the mistake. Clearly it is too late. Things are moving way beyond just accepting the mistakes. The show of force by the Sindh government through its political supporters in Karachi on May 12th has turned the whole situation upside down.

Doctor Sahib, the thing that should always be kept in mind is that Pakistan after so many years of military rule now has many fires to extinguish. From Balochistan to Wana and from Karachi to Islamabad, the society is going through turmoil. This turmoil may turn out well or can go very badly depending how it is going to be handled by Pakistani intellectuals, political parties and the moderates.

With articles like this you don’t help the moderate or the liberal cause. You have a recognized voice in Pakistani political circles and you should use it. You need to show maturity as a political commentator and in fact analyze the situation for possibly better solutions.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by Folio on May 31, 2007 12:52:52 pm
...issue of the military`s huge business empire. (Arjun)

Pakistan`s military has the unique distinction of selling houses and running kebab eateries!!
(Ref: Kamran, the ex-armyman-turned-columnist of Daily Times fame)

If Taiwan has the distinction of her major political party running busness empire, Pakistan is in similar situation. That`s how Pak army is raising resources for it`s huge belly/appetitie for arms and ammunition apart from utilising the tax-money from the same public.

Every other army in the wolrd would be jealous of Pak Army!!!



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by arjun2 on May 31, 2007 12:39:06 pm
Pakistan author accuses military

A respected Pakistani author has accused the government of blocking the launch of her book about the military`s grip on the economy.
Ayesha Siddiqa says her reservation at a government-managed club was cancelled at the last minute, forcing her to find an alternative venue for the launch.

The book deals with the sensitive issue of the military`s huge business empire.

The state-run Associated Press of Pakistan labelled the book ``a plethora of misleading and concocted stories``.

It said that the aim was to give a ``bad name to one of the country`s most prestigious and honourable organisations``.


No government official was available to comment.

`No transparency`

The BBC`s Barbara Plett in Islamabad says it is the first time the army`s penetration of Pakistan`s economy has been documented with such detail.

Ayesha Siddiqa says it owns hundreds of businesses and millions of acres of land.

The military`s empire is worth billions of dollars, she writes, but it is run with virtually no transparency or accountability.


The book was scheduled to be launched at a government-managed club on Thursday but the reservation was cancelled at the last minute, and the author said she could not find another suitable venue.

She claimed the Interior Ministry told hotels in Islamabad not to give her a room, although government officials deny this.

The launch finally went ahead at a small private office. Ms Siddiqa said it is clear the army does not want a debate about its corporate interests.

``It is part of their political power,`` she said. ``It`s the most intransparent part of the economy.

``It`s about the interest of senior generals, they don`t want any discussion on the subject.``

The book`s publication comes at a sensitive time for the military-led government.

A campaign to restore full democracy and civilian rule has been gathering pace since President Musharraf, who is also the army chief, suspended the chief justice over allegations of misconduct.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by chaltahai on May 31, 2007 12:32:03 pm
Can someone please just shoot echoboom and put him out his misery..jeez louise!!

I wouldn;t wish radical islamization on my worst enemy. It is sad and hope it doesn`t get worse.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by HP on May 31, 2007 12:31:02 pm

I have read this article before and I felt that Dr. sahib tends to exaggerate a little.
Couple of things I want to mention here. Dr Sahib referred to two surveys or polls. “Pew Global Survey (2006), the percentage of Pakistanis who expressed confidence in Osama bin Laden as a world leader grew from 45% in 2003 to 51% in 2005.”

Another survey he referred to was by worldpubicopinion.org. That survey reported that only 11% Pakistani have positive feelings about Bin Laden.

Please see the survey here and I would recommend people to go over this report to see how the learned Dr. is relying on wrong stats. One more thing remarkable about the survey is that almost 50% people refused to answer questions.
“Dates of Survey: January 15 – February 15, 2007 Sample Size: 1243

National poll included 611 Urban and 632 rural respondents “
Out of 1243 almost 50% refused to answer many questions.

79% Pakistanis agreed that the terrorism is a very big problem.
See below but for more details go to the link.

http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/apr07/START_Apr07_quaire.pdf


Q36. Overall, would you say your feelings toward Osama bin Laden are?
Egypt Indonesia Morocco Pakistan Urban Rural All
Very positive..........................................21% 5% 7% 12% 9% 11%
Somewhat positive..................................19 16 20 15 13 14
Mixed......................................................34 32 26 24 19 21
Somewhat negative...................................9 10 10 8 6 7
Very negative..........................................11 9 11 7 4 6
Refused/Don’t Know................................6 26 25 35 48 41


d. Terrorism
Egypt Indonesia Morocco Pakistan
Urban Rural All
Very big problem...................................62% 67% 1% 83% 75% 79%
Moderate problem.....................................8 21 12 10 8 9
Small problem.........................................13 7 78 3 5 4
Not a problem.........................................16 1 6 1 1 1
Refused/Don’t Know................................1 4 4 2 12 7

I have my reservations about how these pollsters qualify urban and rural and then how they contact people.

Now the question: what is there to substantiate the doomsday scenario by Dr. PH?

More on this later…


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by echoboom on May 31, 2007 12:29:28 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by aslam644 on May 31, 2007 11:32:03 am
Pakistan is the land of extremes, whereas most Islamist parties in other countries are moderating i.e. hamas hasn’t banned alcohol, cinemas, they main concern seems to be liberation and social justice. In morocco paradoxically the islamist party is led by a woman.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on May 31, 2007 11:23:35 am
#5 Urstruly {``are you suggesting that even though 80% of a nation wants to be ruled by a certain ideology, it must be prevented from doing so ``}

Urstruly,
Are you suggesting that if an 80% majority wishes to eliminate the other 20% from the face of the earth, they should be allowed to do so? If 80% want ``free love, no work, all fun, plenty of drugs, alcohol, and gambling,`` then they should be allowed to pursue ``life, liberty, and `appiness.`` Maybe it`s time to pass free samples to average Pakis who have never tasted the good life. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by Urstruly on May 31, 2007 11:07:07 am
Hoodbhoy writes:

``Support for the Sharia is also rising. A survey by the World Public Opinion.Org (April 24, 2007) found that 54% of Pakistanis wanted strict application of Sharia while 25% wanted it in some more dilute form. Totaling 79%, this was the largest percentage in the four countries surveyed (Morocco, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia)11.

So help me understand here, are you suggesting that even though 80% of a nation wants to be ruled by a certain ideology, it must be prevented from doing so by violent means such as a brutal fascist military rule or a threat of foreign aggression as you are tacitly suggesting. Actually you are only tacitly supporting a military dictatorship as long as it crushes the ideology that you don`t like by violent means whereas you are begging for a foreign intervention and aggression.

In all honesty you know it and I know it that Pakistan is headed towrads an inevitable civil war where sides will be chosen and attrocities will be committed. Ultimately, there will be public executions through firing squads and guilotines. That, you and I both know, is written on the wall. There exists an alternative, which is to resolve the current constitutional crises through political means, send military home, and have free and fair elections. Let the Pakistani nation resolve its issues, ideological or otherwise, through political and democratic means. This is the last chance and option of a Magna Carta for the corrupt, westernized, oppressive elite. From here everything is downhill.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by echoboom on May 31, 2007 11:04:01 am
The leaping-Lemmings of Pakistan: Liberaloons.
When a Liberaloon has a death wish
he heads towards Maader-ation starts cooking Raushan-Khayali-Pilafs.


At the Edge of Revolution: Does Pakistan Have a Khomeini?


Iason Athanasiadis | Bio | 30 May 2007


LAHORE, Pakistan -- ``The only time I wore a burka was at a fancy-dress ball,`` says Unver, a Pakistani painter hailing from an upper class Pakistani family. Speaking to a group of friends, he recounts sending his driver to the market to buy him the cheap, all-enveloping veil sealed with a face grill that many of Pakistan`s most conservative women wear on sorties outside the house.

``After forty minutes of wearing that thing, I was drenched in sweat. Next time I saw my driver, I asked him how his wife can wear that thing all the time. He just looked at me with an expression that said, `You don`t understand.```


Unver`s post-party exchange with his driver hints at the massive cultural gap between the elites inhabiting the villas vacated by the British colonial masters and the vast majority of Pakistan`s 190 million poverty-stricken masses. In Iran, a resource-rich country twice the size of Pakistan and with a third its population, this social disparity bubbled over in 1979 into a Revolution that led to the foundation of the first Islamic Republic in the Middle East. Could this be the path that Pakistan will follow?



Unver is the only one of his siblings to have returned to Pakistan from the West. One of Pakistan`s foremost painters, he sells his striking figurative and abstract works for several times what the average Pakistani makes in a year. His world is peopled by a British-accented Pakistani elite inhabiting exclusive districts of Lahore or Karachi and punctuated with shooting and fishing getaways conducted against a background of private guards, cooks and drivers. In Iran, almost thirty years ago, people such as Unver were shocked when the classes to which their servants belonged rose up to overthrow them and confiscate their properties. Could it be Pakistan`s turn next?



``A civil war in slow motion has started already,`` said a Lahore-based Pakistani journalist who refused to be named for fear of jeopardizing his position. ``Musharraf has a double standard: he`s killing Baloch nationalists in the name of security and patronizing mullahs inside the capital.``



Pakistan`s military President came to power in a 1999 coup and assumed the position of Washington`s main partner in its post-9/11 War on Terror. To safeguard American aid, Musharraf conjured the specter of Islamic radicalism as the only alternative to himself in a bid to convince the Americans that he is an indispensable partner. At the same time, he gave religious radicals more leeway to conduct their activities than at any other time since the Islamist Pakistani President Zia Ul Haqq.



In a notorious, ongoing case, hundred