Abdul Arif June 13, 2007
#1 Posted by zensufi on June 13, 2007 2:50:44 pm
Hallo - there is a reason Child Psychology is a department all by itself... tons to cover!
-zensufi-
-zensufi-
#2 Posted by khawarshehzad on June 13, 2007 9:27:21 pm
Hi,
Great article.
My name is khawar shehzad and I am an Editor of students local magazine in Pakistan. I want to contact regarding its publication in the magazine. I hope you will like to help us in our cause of opening venues of learning for others.
My email address is khawar.shehzad@gmail.com
I hope you will consider my request.
Cheers
Great article.
My name is khawar shehzad and I am an Editor of students local magazine in Pakistan. I want to contact regarding its publication in the magazine. I hope you will like to help us in our cause of opening venues of learning for others.
My email address is khawar.shehzad@gmail.com
I hope you will consider my request.
Cheers
#4 Posted by nb on June 14, 2007 9:02:12 pm
Recent advances in medical science tell us that neural systems which are responsible for emotion and intellect are separate
Er,no, they are not.
Er,no, they are not.
#5 Posted by PM on June 17, 2007 1:14:23 am
Good summary of the topic, Abdul Arif!
Btw, the selfless gene, so to speak, isn`t unique to homo sapiens. It is to be found all over the animal kingdom, for instance, in rats jumping off cliffs to ensure the survival of their overcrowding offspring.
So it all comes down to a Platonic ideal: The `good` is a function of (good) knowledge. Morality, separate from biological imperative, doesn`t really exist. Does this mean that God is dead, after all? Or maybe that Biology -- a certain ``Englightened Biology``-- is God?
Cool!
Btw, the selfless gene, so to speak, isn`t unique to homo sapiens. It is to be found all over the animal kingdom, for instance, in rats jumping off cliffs to ensure the survival of their overcrowding offspring.
So it all comes down to a Platonic ideal: The `good` is a function of (good) knowledge. Morality, separate from biological imperative, doesn`t really exist. Does this mean that God is dead, after all? Or maybe that Biology -- a certain ``Englightened Biology``-- is God?
Cool!
#6 Posted by KaalChakra on June 19, 2007 10:08:21 am
Unfortunately, won`t be able to spend as much time here to learn about this topic but, at this point, I have a slightly different, probably not very well informed, view.
I see an analogy here with materialism. Pure materialism, the one and only God of all Indian liberals, explains a lot, but not all. Or, not as efficiently as any good theory should.
But combine and cross materialism with idealism, and suddenly the fit between theory and reality multiplies.
I suspect just as we speak of selfish genes, we might do well to recognize the existence of selfish principles. Or selfish ideas.
Together, selfish genes, and selfish ideas, make our world what it is.
Now, it`s possible, science has already proven otherwise.
I see an analogy here with materialism. Pure materialism, the one and only God of all Indian liberals, explains a lot, but not all. Or, not as efficiently as any good theory should.
But combine and cross materialism with idealism, and suddenly the fit between theory and reality multiplies.
I suspect just as we speak of selfish genes, we might do well to recognize the existence of selfish principles. Or selfish ideas.
Together, selfish genes, and selfish ideas, make our world what it is.
Now, it`s possible, science has already proven otherwise.
#7 Posted by Chennai on June 19, 2007 11:07:30 pm
Re: # 6
``Pure materialism, the one and only God of all Indian liberals, explains a lot, but not all.``
Who is this Indian Liberal...:)))
``Pure materialism, the one and only God of all Indian liberals, explains a lot, but not all.``
Who is this Indian Liberal...:)))
#8 Posted by KaalChakra on June 20, 2007 12:58:35 am
chennai, anyone who is a good person. LOL
Seriously, a bad man came up with this crazy idea: whenever you want to abuse someone, to blame some group for all of the world`s problems, misfortunes, and injustices, or even for the heck of it, always target good folks.
They don`t mind too much.
(If you are a good man, you would be blaming yourself anyways. So you see, all fits nicely.)
Seriously, a bad man came up with this crazy idea: whenever you want to abuse someone, to blame some group for all of the world`s problems, misfortunes, and injustices, or even for the heck of it, always target good folks.
They don`t mind too much.
(If you are a good man, you would be blaming yourself anyways. So you see, all fits nicely.)
Interact Index
Also by Abdul Arif
Similar Articles
- The Gin Game Naveen Qayyum
- The Unbearable Lightness of Seeing Wajahat Malik
- Yet Another Immigrant Story Madiha Qureshi
- Solving Amarnath: A New Hope in Kashmir Murtaza Shibli
- Diabetes: Wrestling with a Twenty-First Century Monster Mutaal Mooquin
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- masadi: dash_dot writes "And all... Muslim Ghettoisation
- BJ2: Re: # 238 Arjun, the... Muslims in America
- Eklavya: shattered, agreed. And normal... Muslim Ghettoisation
- truth100: NDocR, I have two maids... Diabetes: Wrestling with a
- truth100: BTW, who is 101?... Diabetes: Wrestling with a
- truth100: Quin, Beautiful Poem! Though I... Diabetes: Wrestling with a
- sattar2: BJ2 (#237), I am giggling... Muslims in America
- NDocR: Re: # 35 Dear... Diabetes: Wrestling with a








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content