Mohammad Gill June 5, 2007
#988 Posted by zeemax on June 17, 2007 1:46:38 am
#987 by HP ,
humsab is a typican `baghal mein churri munh mein ram ram` type of banya ...
humsab is a typican `baghal mein churri munh mein ram ram` type of banya ...
#987 Posted by HP on June 17, 2007 1:23:55 am
#986 by Humsab
``it is my job to save him from your clutches (your influence). ``
this fker is a padre. He is out to save people.
``let us see if you can give logical answers to the questions I raised``
I haven`t read the whole thread but I doubt that you even have the ability to ask any thing remotely close to logical. Accept your shortcomings and don`t pretend otherwise. You are an idiot and you need to believe in yourself.
Btw, what is going on here? why so many posts on this article?
``it is my job to save him from your clutches (your influence). ``
this fker is a padre. He is out to save people.
``let us see if you can give logical answers to the questions I raised``
I haven`t read the whole thread but I doubt that you even have the ability to ask any thing remotely close to logical. Accept your shortcomings and don`t pretend otherwise. You are an idiot and you need to believe in yourself.
Btw, what is going on here? why so many posts on this article?
#986 Posted by Humsab on June 17, 2007 12:55:10 am
Zee ji
Why you people lack patience? Why don`t you read # 982 and then respond. I was not pontificating on Islam but was pontificating on good manners and restraint ( word that I suppose does not exist in your dictionary). Philosopher is basically a good person and as another human being`s well wisher, it is my job to save him from your clutches (your influence).
Now coming to Islam, let us see if you can give logical answers to the questions I raised yesterday or you will shy away telling me that being hindu I won`t understand.
Regards and smile because world is a beautiful place with wonderful people all around.
Why you people lack patience? Why don`t you read # 982 and then respond. I was not pontificating on Islam but was pontificating on good manners and restraint ( word that I suppose does not exist in your dictionary). Philosopher is basically a good person and as another human being`s well wisher, it is my job to save him from your clutches (your influence).
Now coming to Islam, let us see if you can give logical answers to the questions I raised yesterday or you will shy away telling me that being hindu I won`t understand.
Regards and smile because world is a beautiful place with wonderful people all around.
#985 Posted by zeemax on June 17, 2007 12:45:55 am
#976 by Naqshbandi,
...just as the hadd laws CANNOT be enforced in the absence of a Caliph (read fiqh 101) so also t islam does not allow vigilantes to murder someone for insulting the Prophet...
Naqshbandi, try getting this into your sufiana-shite-infested single-cell brain:
Who was that guy whom none other than M.A. Jinnah defended? Ghazi Ilam Din (Shaheed)? And for what crime?
Ever heard of this guy who is regarded as a great hero?
Now go and tell me both Ilam Din and Jinnah were `wahabi` or whatever you want to call them. You`re just deluded in your relapses from bhang and afeem. Try some `dhol` of Pappu Sain at Shah Jamal or distribute some rotis at Data Darbar to get your faculties back ... :)
...just as the hadd laws CANNOT be enforced in the absence of a Caliph (read fiqh 101) so also t islam does not allow vigilantes to murder someone for insulting the Prophet...
Naqshbandi, try getting this into your sufiana-shite-infested single-cell brain:
Who was that guy whom none other than M.A. Jinnah defended? Ghazi Ilam Din (Shaheed)? And for what crime?
Ever heard of this guy who is regarded as a great hero?
Now go and tell me both Ilam Din and Jinnah were `wahabi` or whatever you want to call them. You`re just deluded in your relapses from bhang and afeem. Try some `dhol` of Pappu Sain at Shah Jamal or distribute some rotis at Data Darbar to get your faculties back ... :)
#984 Posted by zeemax on June 17, 2007 12:33:50 am
#982 by Humsab,
I think Abu had amply clarified that we Muslims regard the prophet, his wives, and other family members more than our own baap-ma-behn-beti, and always will. We don`t allow garbage to be tossed on either of them one bit.
But you won`t understand that being a hindu. These are Muslim things so please stop pontificating on the subject.
I think Abu had amply clarified that we Muslims regard the prophet, his wives, and other family members more than our own baap-ma-behn-beti, and always will. We don`t allow garbage to be tossed on either of them one bit.
But you won`t understand that being a hindu. These are Muslim things so please stop pontificating on the subject.
#983 Posted by zeemax on June 17, 2007 12:24:53 am
#977 by philosopher
Brahay karam oos karmoun jali kee maaang bher dee jiyay.
LoL .. I think you`re really doing a PhD in Urdu and not falsafa ... :)
Brahay karam oos karmoun jali kee maaang bher dee jiyay.
LoL .. I think you`re really doing a PhD in Urdu and not falsafa ... :)
#982 Posted by Humsab on June 16, 2007 10:16:31 pm
philosopher ji
This is not done. The moment this born again muslim Zeemax came on the scene, you went back to the field of darkness, enlightenment and ice creams. Why can`t you people leave hamidm`s family alone? Has he ever abused anybody`s ma-behn-beti? Seriously, you need to learn a lot particularly art of discussing without being emotional and in a detached manner.
Regards
This is not done. The moment this born again muslim Zeemax came on the scene, you went back to the field of darkness, enlightenment and ice creams. Why can`t you people leave hamidm`s family alone? Has he ever abused anybody`s ma-behn-beti? Seriously, you need to learn a lot particularly art of discussing without being emotional and in a detached manner.
Regards
#981 Posted by anil on June 16, 2007 10:00:31 pm
Re: # 910
Hamindm sahib:
``...between me and him ......... if he is so omnieverything ...``
You might like to think of using ``Him`` and He, don`t you think?
Hamindm sahib:
``...between me and him ......... if he is so omnieverything ...``
You might like to think of using ``Him`` and He, don`t you think?
#980 Posted by teshah on June 16, 2007 7:37:23 pm
Re: # 811
Abu...
``For people that never recieved the message of Islam, Allah swt will deal with them differently as compared to the ones that received the message and then rejected it because they had corruption in their nature.``
You mean a `Rehmat` - the receiving of the message of God - became a `zehmat` for them?
Was not the message of Islam meant only for the Arabs as Allah says I send message only in the language of the nation for which it is meant.
Abu...
``For people that never recieved the message of Islam, Allah swt will deal with them differently as compared to the ones that received the message and then rejected it because they had corruption in their nature.``
You mean a `Rehmat` - the receiving of the message of God - became a `zehmat` for them?
Was not the message of Islam meant only for the Arabs as Allah says I send message only in the language of the nation for which it is meant.
#979 Posted by philosopher on June 16, 2007 7:02:52 pm
Re: # 978shoushah uncle
Kiyon apni Aakhrat kharaab karte ho? Go prepare yourself for hoories of Jannah.lest you remain frustrated in the Aakhrat as well.
And BTW how is your computer doing now?Perhaps it has been trying to save you from the hellfire that you are gonna feel in the ever lasting June and july of Jahanaam.but you seem to be unaware of this last divine warning.
I wish ``aap ke computer mein keeray parain`` so that you stop spreading this filth on chowk.
Kiyon apni Aakhrat kharaab karte ho? Go prepare yourself for hoories of Jannah.lest you remain frustrated in the Aakhrat as well.
And BTW how is your computer doing now?Perhaps it has been trying to save you from the hellfire that you are gonna feel in the ever lasting June and july of Jahanaam.but you seem to be unaware of this last divine warning.
I wish ``aap ke computer mein keeray parain`` so that you stop spreading this filth on chowk.
#978 Posted by teshah on June 16, 2007 6:51:04 pm
Re: # 919
hamidm2
Why be sad and optimistic at the same time?
How could enlightenment and moderation go together? It was just hypocrisy (munafiqat). It seems to be a defining interlude in the Paky history. It is, what they say, `Damma dam must qalandar`. The Lal Masjid is doing a yeomans job in exposing `munafiqana` moderation of the Paky society wherein a minister could openly maintain a keep at public expence in the heart of the capital and no body took notice of it except the mullah of the lal masjid.
Again, you must have heard the report about the tracing of Nishtar Park suicide bomber who had killed dozens of the leaders of the Sunni Jamaat by exploding himself. That bomber reportedly belonged to `Lashkare Jhangwi`, an extremist anti-shia organization. But don`t be surprized as I had seen posters and wall-chalkings (by some extremist Wahabi group perhaps) which condemned both sunny (Barelvi?) and shia as `mushrikeen`.
But:
``Mudaayi laakh bura chaahe to kia hota he
Woh hi hota he jo manzoore khuda hota he``
Many an issuers of death-edicts have died (barazaae Ilaahi?) while their edictees (?) are alive (bilaa barizaae Ilaahi?) and kicking.
You are great Mian Hamid but as Iqbal says:
``Gaahe `teri` nigaahe tez cheer gayi dile wajood
Gaahe ulajh ke reh gaei `tere` touhimaat mein``.
hamidm2
Why be sad and optimistic at the same time?
How could enlightenment and moderation go together? It was just hypocrisy (munafiqat). It seems to be a defining interlude in the Paky history. It is, what they say, `Damma dam must qalandar`. The Lal Masjid is doing a yeomans job in exposing `munafiqana` moderation of the Paky society wherein a minister could openly maintain a keep at public expence in the heart of the capital and no body took notice of it except the mullah of the lal masjid.
Again, you must have heard the report about the tracing of Nishtar Park suicide bomber who had killed dozens of the leaders of the Sunni Jamaat by exploding himself. That bomber reportedly belonged to `Lashkare Jhangwi`, an extremist anti-shia organization. But don`t be surprized as I had seen posters and wall-chalkings (by some extremist Wahabi group perhaps) which condemned both sunny (Barelvi?) and shia as `mushrikeen`.
But:
``Mudaayi laakh bura chaahe to kia hota he
Woh hi hota he jo manzoore khuda hota he``
Many an issuers of death-edicts have died (barazaae Ilaahi?) while their edictees (?) are alive (bilaa barizaae Ilaahi?) and kicking.
You are great Mian Hamid but as Iqbal says:
``Gaahe `teri` nigaahe tez cheer gayi dile wajood
Gaahe ulajh ke reh gaei `tere` touhimaat mein``.
#977 Posted by philosopher on June 16, 2007 4:54:37 pm
Re: # 975naqshay
Re: # 975NAQSHAY
[One can still become a kafir for insulting the Prophet but in the absence of an islamic state islam does not allow vigilantes to go and kill people for whatever reason]
My question raised back in #948 is still waiting for reply like a ``pre feminism and enlightened maadration`` Biwi who would stand and wait at the door to recieve his ``Sirtaaj`` and ` majazi khuda``
Brahay karam oos karmoun jali kee maaang bher dee jiyay.
Re: # 975NAQSHAY
[One can still become a kafir for insulting the Prophet but in the absence of an islamic state islam does not allow vigilantes to go and kill people for whatever reason]
My question raised back in #948 is still waiting for reply like a ``pre feminism and enlightened maadration`` Biwi who would stand and wait at the door to recieve his ``Sirtaaj`` and ` majazi khuda``
Brahay karam oos karmoun jali kee maaang bher dee jiyay.
#976 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 16, 2007 4:49:18 pm
zeemax, try getting this into your wahabist-hate-filled brain:
just as the hadd laws CANNOT be enforced in the absence of a Caliph (read fiqh 101)
so also t islam does not allow vigilantes to murder someone for insulting the Prophet even though anyone who finds fault with His Excellency alayhisalatuwasalam in any way or form becomes an apostate. Get it?
just as the hadd laws CANNOT be enforced in the absence of a Caliph (read fiqh 101)
so also t islam does not allow vigilantes to murder someone for insulting the Prophet even though anyone who finds fault with His Excellency alayhisalatuwasalam in any way or form becomes an apostate. Get it?
#975 Posted by Naqshbandi on June 16, 2007 4:40:57 pm
raw_dust..how about these gems from the wahabis-deobandis,
`` Jissay Ali Nabi kehte hain woh tinka tor ka do bhi nahin kar saktay`` -- ismaeel dihlavi in his utterly burnable book taqwiyatul iman.
``To think of the Prophet in namaz is worse than thinking of a quadraped``
``What`s so special about the Prophet`s knowledge? Such knowledge is also shared by cows and goats and quadrupeds and insects..``--Ashraf Ali Thanawi
``The Prophet did not even know what was behind the wall``--Ismail Dihlavi
``Allah Ta`ala is capable of lying`` -Gangohi
``The Prophet died and turned to dust``- many deo books
etc. etc.
One can still become a kafir for insulting the Prophet but in the absence of an islamic state islam does not allow vigilantes to go and kill people for whatever reason...
also, rushdie was already a self-confessed kafir BEFORE he wrote the utterly burnable satanic verses; whereas your religious elders of deoband and other wahabis insult the Prophet whilst pretending to be pious religious leaders!
`` Jissay Ali Nabi kehte hain woh tinka tor ka do bhi nahin kar saktay`` -- ismaeel dihlavi in his utterly burnable book taqwiyatul iman.
``To think of the Prophet in namaz is worse than thinking of a quadraped``
``What`s so special about the Prophet`s knowledge? Such knowledge is also shared by cows and goats and quadrupeds and insects..``--Ashraf Ali Thanawi
``The Prophet did not even know what was behind the wall``--Ismail Dihlavi
``Allah Ta`ala is capable of lying`` -Gangohi
``The Prophet died and turned to dust``- many deo books
etc. etc.
One can still become a kafir for insulting the Prophet but in the absence of an islamic state islam does not allow vigilantes to go and kill people for whatever reason...
also, rushdie was already a self-confessed kafir BEFORE he wrote the utterly burnable satanic verses; whereas your religious elders of deoband and other wahabis insult the Prophet whilst pretending to be pious religious leaders!
#974 Posted by zeemax on June 16, 2007 4:24:09 pm
#973 by philosopher,
Yeah .... that`s why I saved your post ... need some manners being the cursed guy LoL ...
Be back when the ``SHAITAANS`` are around ... BRB !!!
Yeah .... that`s why I saved your post ... need some manners being the cursed guy LoL ...
Be back when the ``SHAITAANS`` are around ... BRB !!!
#973 Posted by philosopher on June 16, 2007 4:19:32 pm
Re: # 972zeemax
[Lo .... dono daurh gaye .... oh well .... naqsha bhi aur khudai khidmatgar bhi]
The glorious says that; when truth comes falsehood perishes. Lo;falsehood by its nature bound to perish.
LOL.
You desparatly need to learn manners because you are the most cursed guy by the ``SHAITAANS`` around.
May shaitaans keep cursing you.LOL.
[Lo .... dono daurh gaye .... oh well .... naqsha bhi aur khudai khidmatgar bhi]
The glorious says that; when truth comes falsehood perishes. Lo;falsehood by its nature bound to perish.
LOL.
You desparatly need to learn manners because you are the most cursed guy by the ``SHAITAANS`` around.
May shaitaans keep cursing you.LOL.








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content