unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Section 144: Ban on public gatherings

almas almass June 12, 2007

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all

#6 Posted by almass on June 13, 2007 3:18:53 pm
mantolive yeah i got things mix up :)i rechecked my source . Section 144 of criminal procedure code is from the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898. my bad also... hope u wont prosecute me for some act of spreading disinformation :P
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by MantoLives on June 13, 2007 2:23:28 am
Sorry just saw that you did ... my bad.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by MantoLives on June 13, 2007 2:22:47 am
In addition to the fine charter of the UN, you could also quote Article 16 of Pakistan`s current constitution:

16. Freedom of assembly.
Every citizen shall have the right to assemble peacefully and without arms, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of public order.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by MantoLives on June 13, 2007 2:19:47 am
While I agree with the article in toto... I am a bit stumped by this reference to ``British Constitution of 1938``....

The British constitution is unwritten - consisting on several documents ... the most important being the Bill of Rights from the 17th century...

Did the author mean Government of India Act 1935... or some law under the same?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by Urstruly on June 12, 2007 10:25:59 am

The two draconian laws - Section 144 and MPO 16 - are carte blanche for corrupt, westernized ruling elite to control masses, even with murder of unarmed citizens. The so-called government, which in fact is a set up to subjugate people, is immune from the consequences of these laws. I do not think that other than destroying and dismantling this system there is a way to change the situation by ``creating awareness`` alone. I have endured the wrath of state power when beaten mercilessly during a baton charge in a protest (happened more than once but then I smartened up). Apart from choking pain, the most horrible thing in the baton charge is the swooshing sound of the swinging baton which ends in a thumping sound when it hits your ribs. People! be nice to animals and cattle. Been there.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by Ally on June 12, 2007 4:55:34 am
I always wondered what `chhataali` was!

thanks... now i know its a rubbish law!!!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content

Interact Index

    #6 almass
    #5 MantoLives
    #4 MantoLives
    #3 MantoLives
    #2 Urstruly
    #1 Ally

Similar Articles

  • Rape Survivor Families Struggle Against Odds Beena Sarwar
  • Alcohol and Teenagers: A Lethal Mixture Feroz Qutabshahi
  • Pakistan and the Death Penalty: Time to Call it Quits Beena Sarwar
  • Aitzaz’s Monumental Blunder saeed qureshi
  • Please De-stabilize the System Ahmer Muzammil
more »

US Elections 2008 Primaries

  • Hillary Clinton a Better Presidential Candidate
  • Leaders, Heroes and Mountains
  • Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and New American Dreams
  • Pakistan Elections 2008 - An analysis
  • Political Issues Ahead of Pakistan Elections
more »
get rss feed Get Chowk RSS Feed

Get Chowk Newsletter

Latest Interacts

  • pinku: #301 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: Dinaric #298: I am... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: pinku: i really dont... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: ajeya: thanks for your... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • ajeya: #296 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • Dinaric: Re: # 295 I agree... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • pinku: #296 Posted by tahmed32... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: pinku/dinaric: going by chowk... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak: A Man for All Seasons
  • Three Cups of Tea & Pennies for Peace
  • Losing the Battle, Losing the Faith
  • Not to Forget the Devastation of October 8, 2005 Earthquake
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Junooni
  • Phool Na Loon to Kiya Karoon?
  • Gender and Literacy in Pakistan
  • Dreams and Promises
  • Please spare the poor animals this Eid!

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited