unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

What Lies Beneath: Dispatch from the Frontlines of the Burqa Brigades

Fawzia Afzal Khan July 5, 2007

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#1 Posted by harish_hyd on July 5, 2007 11:47:58 pm
good narrative....the operation seems to be going on...or is it over?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 2:53:23 am
``... burned down a women’s college next door ...?`` .. Oh, you mean the FG Girls school across the street which was vacated by rangers to be used as their sniping station.

Nevertheless, thanks for a good guided tour, Prof. Shamim, despite the nauseatingly arrogant tone.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 2:57:21 am
.... or maybe she means the Ministry of environment .. don`t know which one.

But as I said in that other piece of garbage on the issue, Shamimists are not expected to know facts.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by ballukhan on July 6, 2007 3:14:19 am
Please close down these horrible places of brainwashing the young. It is nauseating to see these young and masum children being turned into violent and hate filled demons by these mullahs.
Burn them down. I am glad Mush is doing the right thing now.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by SalmanBkhan on July 6, 2007 3:50:25 am
``(his brother, Maulana Abdul Aziz, the Head of Jamia Fareedia and the Lal Masjid, apparently never gives interviews to women)``

But has a fetish for dressing in a women clothes, carrying a womens hand bag including lip-stick.

What a clown.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by masadi on July 6, 2007 3:54:55 am
Note my July 3 post

The CIA media outpost in Pakistan, GEO TV (you don`t fool me A-holes) has kicked in full gear, as it adds fuel to the fire that America has lit for the current dictator. Their coverage compared to others gave out their agenda clearly, grossly exaggerated, as if a ``war`` (their words) was going on, with multiple ``female student`` casualties- there were none. Not only that the Lal masjid crisis was preempted by the mosque people, so much time and effort spent by the CIA to manufacture this crisis cannot just lie dormant because it has become obvious to Musharraf who the players are who want him out, and he is scared as hell. Remember the role of this CIA outpost, GEO TV, when another recent ``manufactured crisis``, that of the CJ gained in momentum after police, only Allah knows who ordered them, broke into its Islamabad offices, while the cameras were conveniently buzzing.....go figure. Don`t these CIA A-holes realize that this has become old news now, I wouldn`t blame anyone who goes Hugo Chavez on their a$$.... What purpose does such coverage serve in Pakistan you ask, first as is obvious by GEO’s explicit rantings, that the government has lost control in Pakistan and Talibanization is taking hold in the capital city itself (something that Karzai and the Neocons have been selling to America), on the other hand it uses any bloodshed and casualties as the over handedness of the government, and adds to the already negative sentiments generated by the CJ manufactured crisis among the local population. Musharraf is a bas$$rd who has fallen out of favor with the US elite, his pants are on fire, he runs helter skelter, tries things all across the board but one crisis follows another because those who he is trying to go against, are firmly in charge of the dominant institutions of Pakistan, whether the uniform is his second skin or not, they are well versed in skinning rats they have nurtured in the past…




Last night Geo managed to sneak a direct line side the mosque and mediate between the Mullah Ghazi and the Federal Minister. The coverage was quite one sided with GEO accusing the government of trying to deliberate bloodshed and the Mullah spewing banalities. What was interesting was how GEO was able to bully the government minister to accept the Media going inside the curfew zone to cover the alleged ``surrender`` as it is happening (or the ensuing bloodshed). THe Federal Minister said ok. Note that the so called ``free`` US media can never dare challenge any federal official let alone an ordinary police officer when an operation is in progress. They usually get pushed off the air or arrested...

Today, as the Mullah`s fingerprints are being scanned onto the hellfire that the US elite are aiming towards Musharraf`s a$$, there were shots fired towards the ``dictator that has fallen out of US favor``, as his plane was airborne. The Lal Masjid (manufactured) drama is a perfect pretext for the US elite not only to punish Musharraf for being too independent, among the local population, as they did with the CJ manufactured crisis (both designed to punish him) but also as a cover to finish off what they like doing with previously supported ``Third World`` dictators...after they`ve checked them for lice and mouth cavities....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by jayp on July 6, 2007 3:58:37 am
Burka-mulla and pakistan

Burka-mulla is a true pakistan hero and there is nothing shameful about what he has done.Look at the option he had;

He could have come out as a digambar jain sadhoo, that is without any clothes which would have been against the islamic law of showing the willy
He could have come out dressed as a santa clause, that would be a haram of wearing the clothes of another religious idol
He could have come out wearing a dhoti, that would have been the clothes of indians, banned per TNT.

A man wearing a burkha is not banned in islam, and he did the right thing.

Courage and fighting to the end is not a Pakistani value, the great Niazi who surrendered 90,000 troops is hailed as the ``Tiger of Pakistan``. I recently met a new graduate officer of pak army and he said that Niazi`s heroism is still taught in the pak army schools.

In conclusion, he was a most courageous mulla in the true pak tradition, and he followed the islamic dictum right to the hand cuffs, For a very long time, the heriosm of the burka - mulla will told in the madrasa of pakistan, just like the Niazi story in the pak army schools.

long live the burka-mulla
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by masadi on July 6, 2007 4:01:23 am
Ballukhan writes <<< Please close down these horrible places of brainwashing the young. >>>

You need to be closed out of Chowk, the only nauseating thing here is your feigning being an ``Indian Muslim`` and then not losing any opportunity to attack Islam and generalize from the bad Muslim to the general population of Muslims and Islam. You are a fanatical RSS type- Hindu, who would butcher Muslims at will for no reason and yet feign concern and sincerity using your dimwit intellect and mentality.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 4:07:34 am
#6 by masadi,

Dunno about US involvement re the Musharraf plane attack, but I do find this extremely curious. I mean ... Anti A/C guns mounted on a household rooftop?

Two anti-aircraft guns recovered from Rawalpindi house:
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by echoboom on July 6, 2007 4:18:51 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by jayp on July 6, 2007 4:22:08 am
Fawzia,

Why did you waste your time to go to the mulla for the interview. What ever he has said has been said a thousand times on the chowk by YLH and zeemax. How goos the taliban was, and how badly the west has treated muslims.

Any way, the taliban of the burka-mulla types have achieved their goals, now here is a first hand report of the YLH-zeemax views, fom the mulals mouth.

Thanks for teh wasted efforts, burka-mulla zindabad, as pakistanis would say .
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by masadi on July 6, 2007 4:26:55 am
Zeemax writes <<< Dunno about US involvement re the Musharraf plane attack, but I do find this extremely curious. I mean ... Anti A/C guns mounted on a household rooftop? >>>

US involvement means involvment by its occupation force in Pakistan, aka the Pakistan Army- both crisis were manufactured by it.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by harish_hyd on July 6, 2007 4:34:23 am
Denied safe passage, cleric wants `martyrdom`

Excerpt:

``We can be martyred, but we will not court arrest,`` Ghazi told Geo TV, hours after seeking terms.

``One boy, who surrendered himself after sneaking out of the fortified compound housing the mosque and a girls madrasa on Friday, said older students were forcing younger ones to stay.

``Food is running low and water is also limited,`` Ashraf Swati, 15, said, adding that there were several wounded students inside and the stench from dead bodies hung in the air.``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by jayp on July 6, 2007 4:34:30 am
Pak army fighting the rag tag mullas for 3 days, anti aircraft guns in Islamabad roof tops, 4 hours of power supply in pakistans largest city, 3000 suicides a day due to poverty...wel..wel pakistanis are not cursing Jinnah. No human can be that stupid.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by jayp on July 6, 2007 4:50:04 am
I completely agree with Gazi, quoted by Harish below, it is completely un-islamic what mushy is doing in invading the madrasa, it is in-human. I have for a long time argued that a jihadi seeks death as mush a normal human seeks life. A jihadi has opted for the jihadic heaven and after training he travels to far away places like Kashmir to seek the heaven. This struggle should be stopped, he should be shot at the madrasa graduation, on his way out to seek the heaven, delivering heaven at the madrasa door step.

Most of the students at the madrasa under siege have not completed their course, they are not fully prepared to go to heaven, and it is cruelty that mushy is shooting them, an act the UN should condemn.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by ballukhan on July 6, 2007 5:13:00 am
Masadi,

I think that that you should be shut out from chowk as they have shut you out from the modern civilization. Your abusive Ad-Hominems are so glaring that even Al Zawahiri`s curses pales in comparison.
You are mouthing imbecilities like all those Al Qaeda apologists from Lal Masjid after realizing how your Ghazi has been humiliated and looks like a hijr@ in that burqa.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#17 Posted by ballukhan on July 6, 2007 5:23:19 am
I think the lal masjid surrender is going to be one of the finest victories of a moderate Pakistani nation.

Long live Pakistan!!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#18 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 5:35:36 am
I`m really surprised to see to a contribution from Dr. Afzul-Khan on chowk.com and it is way past due.

Welcome!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#19 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 5:37:19 am
Re: # 2

Zeemax Sahib,

You are miles out of your league. My suggestion is an all enveloping burqa because koi nahin aap ke kuch kareinghey ab. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#20 Posted by echoboom on July 6, 2007 5:49:16 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#21 Posted by Naqshbandi on July 6, 2007 6:04:35 am
the public support in islamabad for this action against the terrorists of lal masjid is immense; i do feel for those children trapped inside and not being allowed to leave though. i hope the army now just wipes the hardcore terrorists inside out.

zeemax, until this action by mushy you were crowing for the past month or so about the activities of these terrorists including the Burkha Brigade and how times had changed etc. etc. and how a real islamic system was in place there blah blah blah...

not feeling so cocky now are you as your cowardly wahabi mullahs are being smoked?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#22 Posted by Ally on July 6, 2007 6:04:47 am
way way too long... keep em short lady!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#23 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 6:14:11 am
What Dr. Afzul-Khan pinpoints accurately are the extremely self serving and disturbing reasoning based on rigid dichotomies expressed by both the leadership of Lal Masjid and their female functionaries, instructors down to students. As illustrated by Ghazi Sahib and the Jamia Hafsa students` attempts at grappling with various political, religious and economic theory, these ideologies barely engage with these frameworks before giving up entirely and claiming that their interpretation of Islam is the answer. It is not enough to divide the world into ``Islamic`` and ``non Islamic``, and the labor of parsing these arbitrary categories does not serve their agendas. I would have appreciated Dr. Afzul-Khan`s questioning the fairly predictable patriarchical hierarchy-it seemed that the women and students of this institution were ready to fight a scholar who was not beholden to silly men like Ghazi Sahib while they themselves could not interrogate the orders delivered from on high. This is not an Islamic feminist moment in any real, substantial way-and that these women are able to avoid the struggles that al-Saadaawi, Dr. Amina Wadud, etc. face, tells us what kind of curricula is being taught at this institution.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#24 Posted by mohar11 on July 6, 2007 6:23:11 am
zeemax

dude - you lost... your mullahs ran for their lives in burka, it was pathetic... but don`t lose heart, even if you lost this battle, you can still win the war... but the keep your burkha at hand, just in case... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#25 Posted by malik99 on July 6, 2007 6:24:11 am
The commentary on the state of economics in Pakistan by the women in compound seems to be what 99% of the Pakistanis would agree.

As for author`s point that data on suicides in pakistan has never been ``systematically collected by any agency, government or otherwise``, i suppose just because an agency never collected a data does not mean that suicides never occured. But this dismissive attitude on suicides in Pakistan does seem to highlight the author and her fellow elitists` arrogance. And besides, isnt it a sad commentary on government that it keeps no statistics on how many poverty stricken pakistanis commit suicides each month and how many poverty stricken pakistanis sell their internal organs to get out of debt?

Lastly, it is quite clear that author`s recording device was of substandard quality. Iqbal`s verse is not ``Kafir hai to shamshir pay karta hai takabbur`` - rather, its ``Kafir hai to shamshir pay karta hai bharosa``.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#26 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 6:26:07 am
Re: # 25

``The commentary on the state of economics in Pakistan by the women in compound seems to be what 99% of the Pakistanis would agree...``

what research corroborates this claim?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#27 Posted by bubba on July 6, 2007 7:15:50 am
Was the reporter just afraid to ask the most basic question regarding the genders in close proximity with each other? How is it possible to avoid such a basic question? With over 1,000 young female adults in crowded corridors along with sexually deprived males, there is bound to be some issues with sexual promiscuity. These mullahs have got it made with their brand of morality. Let us see how many of these children were sexually raped by the pedophiles amongst this lot.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#28 Posted by arjun2 on July 6, 2007 7:22:41 am
#9 by zeemax on July 6, 2007 4:07am PT


but I do find this extremely curious.


More curious than the fact that the great warrior of islam cutting and running in a burkha with lipstick in his handbag...was it a prada handbag or a versace??!! with the US elite conspiracy, we`ll never know...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#29 Posted by arjun2 on July 6, 2007 7:25:31 am
#27 by bubba on July 6, 2007 7:15am PT


With over 1,000 young female adults in crowded corridors along with sexually deprived males,



hmm...still not seeing the problem...unless the males in question have changed their sexual preferences recently....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#30 Posted by arjun2 on July 6, 2007 7:28:21 am
neembu: congrats...you`re bilingual...incoherent in two languages..



My suggestion is an all enveloping burqa because koi nahin aap ke kuch kareinghey ab



are the extremely self serving and disturbing reasoning based on rigid dichotomies expressed


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#31 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 7:31:22 am
Re: # 30

Your ignore list:
arjun,atif
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#32 Posted by mooli on July 6, 2007 7:39:43 am
Why does a religious school needs guns?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#33 Posted by bubba on July 6, 2007 7:51:14 am
Re: # 32 To protect their women of course!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#34 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 7:55:34 am
#19 by neembu

Zeemax Sahib, You are miles out of your league. My suggestion is an all enveloping burqa because koi nahin aap ke kuch kareinghey ab. :)

Neembu BiBi, are you trying to say something in Urdu? I`ll have to get the other BiBi (Benazir) to translate it .... :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#35 Posted by arjun2 on July 6, 2007 8:02:57 am
#32 by mooli on July 6, 2007 7:39am PT

to make sure the recreational goats don`t run away?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#36 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 8:06:02 am
Re: # 34

Why not ask Maulana Aziz?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#37 Posted by rf786 on July 6, 2007 8:20:49 am
Re: # 36

{Why not ask Maulana Aziz?}

Correction, you mean AUNTY AZIZ.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#38 Posted by HasanMahmood on July 6, 2007 8:34:01 am
lol, it is funny to read posts from monkeys like zeemax, and masadi. Blame MUSHI for everything. After all the other genius ``Qazi Hussain Ahmed`` is doing the same thing. They will never ever say that this operation has been a great success for the government because jahils like ``Aunty Aziz`` are now done and so are ``her`` sewer rats. Some of the rats who are still free like zeemax and masadi will soon be gone too. They will scream and yell ``MUSHI DID IT - MUSHI DID IT`` before they dissappear into oblivion.....
Today I am PROUD to be a PAKISTANI and a MUSHARAF Supporter.

People blame that a-hole Zia (and rightfully so) for this mess but forget that BB and Nawaz ruled for 11 years and never did a thing against Lal Masjid. But of course lets blame Mushi.....lol


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#39 Posted by hamidm2 on July 6, 2007 8:37:24 am


zeemax, philosopher and echo (?) ...

...... since you guys receive your welfare checks from her majesty`s government, you might want to be careful - your budding careers as aspiring cyber jihadis might be in jeopardy ........... the uk, and the rest of the civilized world, has had enough ..... as for the chicks with sticks and the younger male `students`, i really feel sorry for them and blame their parents for their predicament - the state should not allow them to return to their homes .........

LONDON, July 5: Three ‘cyber-jihadis’ who used the Internet to urge Muslims to wage holy war on non-believers were jailed for between six-and-a-half and 10 years on Thursday in the first case of its kind in Britain.

Tariq Al-Daour, Younes Tsouli and Waseem Mughal had close links with Al Qaeda in Iraq and thought there was a ‘global conspiracy’ to wipe out Islam, the Woolwich Crown Court in southeast London was told.

Moroccan-born Tsouli, 23, was jailed for 10 years; UAE-born Al-Daour, 21, received a six and half years sentence; and 24-year-old Mughal, who was born in Britain, was given seven and half years.

Sentencing them, Judge Charles Openshaw said the men had engaged in ‘cyber jihad’, encouraging others to kill ‘kuffars’ or non-believers.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#40 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 8:49:14 am
#21 by Naqshbandi

...the public support in islamabad for this action against the terrorists of lal masjid is immense;

I don`t doubt that. So what`s your point? From responses in the media it is clear most of the country supports their demands though not their tactics.

... i do feel for those children trapped inside and not being allowed to leave though. i hope the army now just wipes the hardcore terrorists inside out...

Two children did leave today (despite your official-line parroting they`re not allowed to leave), and both were shot dead by the rangers.

zeemax, until this action by mushy you were crowing for the past month or so about the activities of these terrorists including the Burkha Brigade and how times had changed etc. etc. and how a real islamic system was in place there blah blah blah...

I don`t know where I said that. I have always said it is going to be in place. On UP I said there`ll be another (short-lived) attempt at a sham democracy and after that there`ll be an Islamic system ... however, now it is more likely to be Taliban style after this action.

...not feeling so cocky now are you as your cowardly wahabi mullahs are being smoked?

Again I don`t know what you`re talking about. If it is re Maulana Abdul-Aziz, you don`t know much about the Hafsa. You need to know its structure.

Abdul-Aziz was just the khateeb, though a fiery one, but never the main character (though he was painted to be so and the reason for your rejoicing).

Abdul-Rashid is not a Maulana (he has no religious credentials) but was basically assigned to handling the media plus administration plus negotiating duties because he`s University educated.

The mastermind and the ideological engine behind it all is Umme-Hassan, who is the charismatic and talented commander, organizer, and motivator of the Hafsa Brigade.

Both the latter along with over twelve hundred die-hard girl-students, some 300 armed fighters from outside, and about 200-250 orphan children with nowhere to go (altogether some 1900-2000 as per witnesses) are still right there after 4 days of confronting the Pakistan Army`s crack units, heavy firing/tear-gassing (now mortars as well) and refusing to surrender.

I would accept though that I had overestimated the immediate blow-back of such an action, but then the administration has wisely and very carefully calibrated its strategy in not storming outright (which many people including you still advocate in their foolishness in saying the likes of ``i hope the army now just wipes the hardcore terrorists inside out...``) which is to their credit.

Nevertheless, there has been a sudden spike in militant activity with a daily average of six servicemen dead and several more injured in attacks in various parts of the NWFP every single day since the first day, and a serious assassination attempt on Musharraf today.

But of-course, all the above incidents are unrelated :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#41 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 8:54:39 am
#36 by neembu,

But he speaks excellent Urdu ... your language is of the Bibi kind which neither of us understand :-(
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#42 Posted by philosopher on July 6, 2007 8:55:18 am
Re: # 39

Hamid Mukhbar

yaar tu ne mera muttar nikaal dia hai......

yaar hamid......i have been contributing on many porn sites (text...lol) as well ....does it make me safe?....you see sometimes i oppose zeemax`s version of Islam and take side with tahmed32 ji.....man...plz tell me is it enough to save me?....fart...fart....fart....sorry..haanh...you know i am a student of philosophy and i am a bit skeptical about everything....I am the laziest man ever born...i cannot think of killing even a fly....I have publicly admitted that I drink.....is this quality enough to consider me moderate?......

sooo.....fartttttttttt.......farrrrtttttttttttttt......sooooooooooo....suuuuuuuuuu....farrrttttttt

hamid guide me plz....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#43 Posted by hamidm2 on July 6, 2007 9:00:51 am


Re: # 40

zeemax,

..... from the tone and tenor of your post you sound like maulana abul rashid ghazi (soon to be shaheed) ........... look, if it makes you feel any better, i for one, have not counted you guys out yet - your capacity to create mayhem might be diminished for now, but as long as you love death more than most people love life, you will be a force to reckon with ......... but true to form, you could not help blaming all this fitna on a woman !

...... also true to form, it seems that allah`s warriors are using human shields :

ISLAMABAD: Some people on Thursday complained that the Lal Masjid administration was not allowing their relatives who had gone inside the mosque premises to collect their children from coming out, while several students who surrendered said that armed guards kept them from leaving the mosque.

Mohibullah Khan from Dir told Daily Times that his nephew Azizur Rehman had gone inside the mosque to bring his sister Hajra, 12, but had not returned despite passing of several hours.

A group of Pashto-speaking men, all from remote areas of the NWFP, expressed similar complaints, saying they were waiting for their relatives who had gone inside the mosque to pick their children.

Many students, both boys and girls, who surrendered to authorities said they had been kept at the madrassa forcibly and militants had pressed them to sacrifice their lives by staying inside Lal Masjid till the end of the standoff.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#44 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 9:04:04 am
#39 by hamidm2,

Yaar hamidm, how many times should I tell you. I`m not and never have been in favour of indiscriminately `targeting` civilians. Though I don`t mind 3,000 `little eichmanns` of collateral damage once in a while, particularly providing immortal images like two love-birds holding hands and jumping off the 90th floor and landing on the side-walk like eggs sunny-side up.

Nothing above suggests any shifts from my firm position of `who dunnit` :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#45 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 9:12:51 am
#43 by hamidm2,

Firstly, I greatly admire Umme-Hassan, and her behind the scenes assistant Hamsa Abdullah.

Secondly, do you mean they decided to let 1221 human shields (the official count so far and still trickling out, not including two shot dead outside this morning) go, but changed their minds now?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#46 Posted by rf786 on July 6, 2007 9:20:34 am

{Hum Jaanein lotaien gay
Islami Nizam laaien gay… }

Just like AUNTY AZIZ.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#47 Posted by arjun2 on July 6, 2007 9:20:48 am
zeemax: I have some getaway outfit and transportation recommendations...the colors even match...


red purse



white car



blue burkha



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#48 Posted by arjun2 on July 6, 2007 9:22:44 am
#40 by zeemax on July 6, 2007 8:49am PT


Two children did leave today (despite your official-line parroting they`re not allowed to leave), and both were shot dead by the rangers.


allah`s army shooting allah`s chosen people?!!? oh the horror.....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#49 Posted by hamidm2 on July 6, 2007 9:23:11 am
Re: # 47

arjun.


........... sometimes you are funny !
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#50 Posted by rf786 on July 6, 2007 9:23:58 am

Back in 2002 when American planes dropped daisy cutters on the stupid taliban, supporters of taliban kept on saying, this is just the begining, let the amerikee come down and fight like a real man. Well, we all know what happened next to the taliban and their supporters, many have switched sides and many more have perished. Inshallah, the same will happen again.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#51 Posted by hamidm2 on July 6, 2007 9:27:54 am
Re: # 45

zeemax,

..... are these the `children` you are tlaking about ?`` :

Troops launched an assault as a group of students tried to leave the complex. Two students were killed, bringing the death toll to 21.

The BBC`s Shoaib Hasan in Islamabad says a group of students tried to break out of the complex, sparking a co-ordinated assault on three sides by armoured personnel carriers and rangers.

Two students were killed in an exchange of fire and at least 10 wounded, four of them seriously.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#52 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 9:46:40 am
#51 by hamidm2,

Yes these are the two I`m talking about, except that they were unarmed - there was no exchange of fire - and I don`t think if they had any other companions. They were aged 12 and 14. It seems they hadn`t taken-off their shirts as ordered, nor had their hands up.

The security personnel probably thought they were bombers. I don`t blame them.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#53 Posted by hamidm2 on July 6, 2007 9:54:52 am
Re: # 52

zeemax,

..... i wish i could feel sorry for these people, but based on the `death to the apostates and munafiqs` ideology that you so eloquently advocate on this forum, it is difficult to muster up a whole lot of sympathy .......... i doubt very much that if these people had the power, they would be as magnanimous towards their (and allah`s) enemies .........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#54 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 10:00:39 am
#53 by hamidm2,

Of-course you wouldn`t have any sympathy for them. After all, it is either them or you :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#55 Posted by abu_safwaan on July 6, 2007 10:03:30 am
Zee..two innocent unarmed boys ..lost thier lives..n u dont blame the shooters..fair enuff...would u at least find it in ur heart to blame those those 2 basstardd brothers..who either knowingly or unknowingly played in the hands of this vile n vicious administartion all along? i dont need rhetoric..no more big talk about how the victory is about to come at the hands of umm-e-hassan or her saas..just have the decency to accept that these 2 morons were morons all along n u didnt recognize them. n if u cant even do that then maybe u r a moron 2.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#56 Posted by rf786 on July 6, 2007 10:08:04 am
Re: # 45

{Firstly, I greatly admire Umme-Hassan, and her behind the scenes assistant Hamsa Abdullah.}

Admiration for an individual responsible for atleast 16 deaths, misuse of her position as priniciple of an institution where parents sent their childeren for education, that is so you.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#57 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 10:10:01 am
LoL ... just checked Echoboom`s #10.

But never mind minor typos Echo. Nothing to dwell upon. The woman is clearly an idiot.

``This is the feminazis` intro. on her profile page..please check soon before the secularoon/liberaloons don a burqua & try to fix it.

Dr. Fawzia Afzal-Khan is Professor fo English at Montclair State University and author of four books and numerous artciles. Also a trained vocalist in Indian Classical music, Often performs in NYC with her band, Neither East Nor West.

Can anyone spot the reasons why the westoxicated buffoons, the kavvas/kavvis dipped in slaked-lime, are zaleel everywhere..East or West?``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#58 Posted by rf786 on July 6, 2007 10:15:18 am
And this in a place of worship......

AAJ TV UPDATE: Terrorist are holding females and kids against their will. Reporter talked to one of the person who was able to escape out of MOSQUE told this. Reporter also talked to one of the parent who went into LAL MASJID to get his daughter. AS per father ``I and other fathers went into JAMIA HAFZA and loudly called the names of our daughters. We were unable to see any person but a loud voice asked us to leave the premises when we hesitated, someone from inside JAMIA HAFZA fired a gun and bullet hit one of the father in the leg, so we all left``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#59 Posted by scout_new on July 6, 2007 10:15:42 am
thank you chowk staff for publishing this, and thank you dr. fauzia for writing it

gives a great perspective on the mindset of these people
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#60 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 10:19:05 am
#55 by abu_safwaan,

...two innocent unarmed boys ..lost thier lives..n u dont blame the shooters..

No, because you don`t blame the enemy in a war. After all he`ll kill you if you don`t kill him first.

...would u at least find it in ur heart to blame those those 2 basstardd brothers..who either knowingly or unknowingly played in the hands of this vile n vicious administartion all along?

It is not my position that they were playing in anyone`s hands, so I can`t answer this question.

.just have the decency to accept that these 2 morons were morons all along n u didnt recognize them. n if u cant even do that then maybe u r a moron 2.

I don`t think they`re morons, so I have no choice but to accept in that case that I must be a moron too :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#61 Posted by DrDr on July 6, 2007 10:24:36 am
#38 dude masadi is too complex 4 u understand - leave him outta this - zeemax the wannabe zeehadi otoh..
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#62 Posted by masadi on July 6, 2007 10:37:13 am
hassanmahmood writes <<< People blame that a-hole Zia (and rightfully so) for this mess but forget that BB and Nawaz ruled for 11 years and never did a thing against Lal Masjid. But of course lets blame Mushi.....lol >>>>

Like HP correctly noticed, what gives that these idiots post on here, are they retarded to show such amnesia about the global situation, or do they sloganeer just to support the current dictator? Was there a global ``war on terror`` going on when BB and Nawaz ruled to require the kinds of manipulations and adjustments that the `rat out of favor` and his nurturers (the US elite) are upto at the current time. Lal masjid was not on any `radar` during the rule of BB and Nawaz, a rule regardless of the blunders that was more legitimate than any military dictator taking over the country by force and doing the bidding of outsiders...

No big Einstein thought or complexity involved in my posts (which by the way are not blaming Musharraf for the Lal masjid crisis- but alas this idiot doesn`t know how to read, he is just sloganeering like he did in his earlier post by throwing out names BB, Nawaz in order to justify the latest coup in a series of coups by those he supports, rats, that are the occupation force of the Americans in Pakistan.

Let me summarize the basic framework: Nothing of significance can happen in Pakistan without the knowledge of, participation by the Pakistan Army, and nothing of significance can be done by this Army without the knowledge of/participation by the US elite- this is the basic framework well proven by empirical historical facts about Pakistan in its short history; use it to understand all happenings of a significant nature in Pakistan, deviate from it and you fool yourself...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#63 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 10:49:18 am
But Echoboom, this is the ultimate description you had produced (and which I had reproduced from time to time without your permission, and have again dug up):

How the Westoxicated Pakis were enslaved..

....`` I can`t read & write Urdu, I can`t cook Biryaani..Nihaari, I enjoy behaving westernish , kanjarR like, Im professional, I like goraa Ishtyle but hate Islamic laws...Is that not proof sufficient proof that I am maadrate, can cook Raushan-khayali-PuulaaOs, and maaadren, & like a snake molted my Desi Skin culture & religion?

But why O why they still mistake me for a Desi & a muslim?

Maybe I`ll act more KanjarR..only then they`ll know I am a graduate of MIT``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#64 Posted by stuka on July 6, 2007 10:49:29 am
Zeemax: How is Aunty Hafiz? hahahaha!!!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#65 Posted by stuka on July 6, 2007 10:50:58 am

Hum Jaanein lotaien gay
Islami Nizam laaien gay…

(We will lay down our lives; we will bring about an Islamic system)

Jaaney tau patta nahi, aabru zaroor lutayengey..woh bhee Burqa pehen kar. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#66 Posted by mohar11 on July 6, 2007 11:02:20 am
Re: # 47

OK zeemax - you are ready to fight real jihad now... if things go wrong - just remember your red ourse, blue burkha and the get away ``car``...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#67 Posted by abu_safwaan on July 6, 2007 11:02:53 am
Re: # 62

Masadi Sahab wohh sab too theek hayy magar hassan bhai kayy abboo ko army nay joo zameenein or dollaroon kayy tokrayy diyayy hein woh wapas karna parein gayy na agarr apkii baatt mann li jayeyy too.

I think u r being higly judgemental..these r pety ppl with pety desires..they support status-quo for thier pety gains and favours..awam..insaaf..social revolution..these r concepts that r far beyond thier comprehension. The capacity is not there..u must not make fun of handicapped..cause they just can`t help it.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#68 Posted by Nasruminallah on July 6, 2007 11:11:50 am
Masadi

i am afraid you are right, you have very simply put in writing what is a complex reality in our country. I suppose U have read Aysha Siddiqa`s book. well it is not going to change any time soon.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#69 Posted by arjun2 on July 6, 2007 11:14:20 am
#66 by mohar11 on July 6, 2007 11:02am PT

hellfires don`t do targets that look red, white and blue...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#70 Posted by Nasruminallah on July 6, 2007 11:15:19 am
Does any one know how Aunty Aziz was caught. I suppose the lady constabe who was body searching the penguins discovered a weapon to her horror.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#71 Posted by mohar11 on July 6, 2007 11:16:32 am
Re: # 69

Ha ha...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#72 Posted by arjun2 on July 6, 2007 11:18:26 am
#63 by zeemax on July 6, 2007 10:49am PT


How about the pussified islamist warriors?

we talk jihad jihad jihad on the internet...we encourage OTHER people to give their life for allah and his prophet(pbuh) but we have better things to do(like talk jihad on the internet).
we say inshallah and arabic stuff a lot but when Al-push comes to Al-shove, we`re MIA..
we don`t know our asses from our elbows because that information isn`t in the koran...


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#73 Posted by stuka on July 6, 2007 11:26:28 am
Aunty Aziz on PTV

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#74 Posted by Nasruminallah on July 6, 2007 11:31:14 am
The question to ask is who is the maker or breaker here, the wheeler and the dealer, the hand that holds all the strings, the atchitect of dramas like this one, who will rule us, who will leave, who will be in and who will be out and will stay out, who stays and who disappaers, who lives and who dies, this nation has always been suckered into believing one thing or the other like cattle and deprived of life like cattle.

these buggers who masquerade as ulemas are ignoramuses, they have served their utility, used like condoms, they have been discredited in public eye, used like condoms; tomorow there will some one else who will play his part in another drama.

This episode like many others in our past call for serious introspection and reflection.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#75 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 11:35:01 am
Echoboom,

Humayun Gohar had an interesting comment on PTV world today. He said ``Iqbal had put the Djinn of the Mullah in the bottle, but it was released. Now they`re trying to bottle it again``.

Comment?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#76 Posted by Nasruminallah on July 6, 2007 11:39:12 am
well does any one remember the CJ, the flood affectees or teh dead or the APC that was to happen in London, every one is watching the Aunti Aziz soap and ghazi sbs cockiness. and dont no body think this will be over in hours, the show must go on-

--one stone many birds............

Ghazi sb is in control... GG
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#77 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 11:43:58 am
#74 by Nasruminallah,

So who would you like to rule you?

I mean .... I often like to ask this question but I never get a straight answer.

Look, you probably also think that all politicians are crooks too, right (correct me if I`m wrong)? If you don`t, tell me which one. Ulemas are ignoramuses and discredited as you just said. That leaves military rule, but you probably don`t like that as well.

So, who?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#78 Posted by Nasruminallah on July 6, 2007 12:12:32 pm
Re: # 77

The British put forth the argument in the early 1900`s that the Indians are not capable of ruling themselves, we have proved that thesis, just look at our History.

It is a classic case of One overarching Instititution that does not let any thing grow under it. the example of a Big magnificient banyan Tree that is good to look at but nothing grow under it.

Authoratarian rule like of Mr Zia encoureged hypocisry and sycophancy since that is the way to patronage and share of the cake or should I say crumbs that fall on the side.

If by politicians you mean Mr Durrani, I will tell you slime never looked better.

army claims high moral ground and better ethical health against all visible evidance, they could have exerted their weight to keep the system on track like in Turkey but No Sir they have hooked to sweets. you may like to read the book Militry Inc. I can give you the crux if u like.

Was it very diffucult for this government to embark on making primary education Universal, or for zia for that matter.. It has been 8 years. educate the people and let them decide. look at what Malaysia did. we have better resoucres than them.

we hate reason and we hate knowledge, we are the laughing stock of the world.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#79 Posted by Nasruminallah on July 6, 2007 12:18:10 pm
Just Imagine our Media and government is calling Aziz and rashid Ulemas and maulans they are not even worthy to be Moazanns.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#80 Posted by tahmed32 on July 6, 2007 12:21:36 pm
#78 the Indians are doing a fine job of ruling themselves. It is us Pakistanis who are stuck with a military that thinks we cant rule ourselves.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#81 Posted by bubba on July 6, 2007 12:28:04 pm
Re: # 68 No, this poster is not right. He has never ever been right. All he sees is evil coming out from everywhere, and then blames it on the ``US power elite.`` Whatever the heck that is? Just hang around and you will realize how disgusting this notion gets. This interactor does not want to take responsibility whatsoever regarding anything. He is as defunct as those who were holed up in that mosque. Just blame it on the rest of the world, blame it on the system, and when all else fails, bring out the big guns, and hide behind Islam. These people are a shame to the religion and the community of people that has always promoted hard work and progress.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#82 Posted by anil on July 6, 2007 12:38:22 pm
Fawzia:

Some brain-washing machine.

How do you feel, after one cycle?

After one reading cycle, I can only recall Johny Walker`s song;

``Yeh sar jo tera chakraye, ya dil dooba jaye,
aaja pyare pass humare kahe ghabraye...``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#83 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 12:44:50 pm
#78 by Nasruminallah,

See? That`s what I meant by saying I never get a straight answer :-(

I know everyone sucks.

Bhai, I asked that in that case ``Who would you like to rule you?``

Unless you opt for anarchy. That`s fine too. I see nothing wrong with that either ....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#84 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 12:49:33 pm
#80 by tahmed32,

It is us Pakistanis who are stuck with a military that thinks we cant rule ourselves.

Really? Since you were cheering for democracy in Pakistan yesterday ... let`s suppose they get rid of the military rule, who would you then vote for? Or have you still not decided because it`s too early for elections :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#85 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 12:58:14 pm
Anyhow, latest is that Government has offered a house-arrest for Abdul Rashid and his mom in a bungalow/rest house instead of imprisonment, and he has rejected the offer after consultation with the people inside.

Their final terms are clear. Administration can come in, take their arms, arrest the people if any from banned organizations and arrest them, and let everyone else go. Beyond that, none will be arrested. If this is not accepted, they will all die fighting instead.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#86 Posted by bjkumar on July 6, 2007 1:02:59 pm

The Eternal Khaki Song

(Enter the Players)

(Music: Kukuk ku kukukukukuk)

Police:
Burqa ke peechhe kya hai, burqa ke peechhe
Jholee ke neeche kya hai, jholee ke neeche

Mullah:
Ho, jholee mein dil hai meraa, jholee mein dil hai mera
jholee mein dil hai meraa, burqa mein dil hai mera
ye dil mein doongaa khaki – yaar ko, pyaar ko!

Spectators:
Aah!

(Kukuk ku kukukukukuk)

Police: (pointing to chowk mullahs)
Arrey, laakhon deevaane tere, laakhon deevaane
aashiq puraane tere, aashiq puraane

Mullah: (pointing to Urstruly)
Ho, aashiq mila na aisaa, hmmm
meri pasandon jaisa hmmm
De dil shahar ye aisaa, kya karoon… kya karoon

(Hai! Kukuk ku kukukukukuk)

Police:
Resham ka jholaa teraa, resham ka jholaa
Lahanga hai mahanga teraa, lahanga hai mahanga

Mullah:
Lahanga utha ke chaloon, ghunghat gira ke chaloon
Kya kya bacha ke chaloon raamajee, raamji

(Hai! Kukuk ku kukukukukuk)

Chowk Mullahs: (To Mushy)
Arrey, isako bacha lo baaboo, is ko bacha lo
Dil mein chhupaalo baaboo, dil mein chhupaalo

Mullah:
Ho, khaki pade hain peechhe, {o ho!}
Koi idhar ko kheenche, hmmm
Koi udhar ko kheenche, kya karoon kya karoon …

(Hai! Kukuk ku kukukukukuk)

Police:
Arrey! ladaki ho kaisi bolo, ladaki ho kaisi
(looks inside the burqa)
Ladaka ho kaisa bolo , ladaka ho kaisa

Mullah:
Ho ladaki ho mere jaisi {ah ha!}

Police:
Ladaka ho tere jaisa {vaah vaah!}
Aaye maza phir kaisaa, pyaar kaa, pyaar ka {vaah!!}
(Kukuk ku kukukukukuk)

Mushy: (Placating the Mullah)
Ho ... jhumari ka jumaru ban jaa, jhumari ka jumaru {kich kich}
paayal kaa, ghungharu ban ja paayal ka ghungaru {kich kich}
meri salaami kar le
meri ghulaami kar le
Hoga tu hoga koi badashaah, badashaah {arrey jaan!}
(Kukuk ku kukukukukuk)

Mullah:
Baaali umariya meri baali umariya
Suni sajariya meri suni sajariya

Mushy: (Further placating the Mullah)
Mere sapanon ke raaja
Jaldi se vaapas aaja {ah!}
Soti hun main daravaaja khol ke, khol ke {ah!}
(Kukuk ku kukukukukuk)
Begham bagair baadashaah kis kaam ka
Baadashaah bagair begham kis kaam ki

Mullah:
Teri marzi tu jaane, meri marzi main jaanoon
Maine javaani tere naam kee, naam ki {ho choree}

(Exit the Players)

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#87 Posted by tahmed32 on July 6, 2007 1:04:28 pm
bjkumar #86 : Will you be making a YouTube version of this?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#88 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 1:05:56 pm
There was one thing interesting he said .... that there have been many times APC`s were in their sights but they haven`t killed any army-man since that first and only one which was against orders. He claims to have buried 70-80 bodies of his students in the compound as per the deceased`s prior wishes, while three more today are awaiting burial.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#89 Posted by tahmed32 on July 6, 2007 1:06:59 pm
zeemax #84 Like I said, the most important thing is ending military rule, and instead have the military protect the Constitution. It doesnt matter who wins elections after that - you first have to have a wall before you start worrying about what color to paint it today.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#90 Posted by zeemax on July 6, 2007 1:11:12 pm
#89 by tahmed32,

Thank you :)

Now please tell me how do you end military rule without deciding whom to put in its place?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#91 Posted by bjkumar on July 6, 2007 1:15:14 pm

#90 Tahmed 32

[whom to put in its place]

I think they should start with you!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#92 Posted by bjkumar on July 6, 2007 1:17:05 pm

#91 (add-on)

Of course, wearing a burqa is a prerequisite for becoming the (male) ruler of Pakistan!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#93 Posted by bjkumar on July 6, 2007 1:18:25 pm

The mullahs are the more recent claimants. The khakis seem to have had a monoploy on that accomplishment so far!

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#94 Posted by rafi_aamer on July 6, 2007 1:59:30 pm
Re: # 73

Regarding Abdul Aziz`s interview on PTV.

I saw the thing yesterday. Despite having no sympathy for Lal Masjid folks` message or tactics, I think what PTV did was in very bad taste. Whoever thought of that should grow up.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#95 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 2:47:19 pm
Dear Dr. Afzul-Khan,

I would advise you against publishing here again. Apparently the great intellectual interactors known as atif, echoboom, ali and stuka have seen it fit to comment on your appearance, grammar, etc. Two of these cowards have compared your appearance to a porn star. (And we know this exhaustive knowledge of porn is a characteristic well developed in desi men who will eventually have some poor girl forced to marry them).

As usual, the management and staff at this website has not seen fit to curb the culture of sexual harrassment prevalent here which is why there are several women interactors who refuse to send their work to this website. My suggestion is that you boycott this website as well-or at least deny them your work.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#96 Posted by fak0912 on July 6, 2007 2:49:12 pm
Re: # 11
I do not believe any effort to see things for oneself are wasted efforts. I also feel all of us are human beings, no matter how screwed up our ideologies. We need to listen to one another...as a secular liberal (yes, I know those may be dirty words for some of you)--I did what i have been trained to do: listen to the other side without condemnation and hatred.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#97 Posted by fak0912 on July 6, 2007 2:52:12 pm
Re: # 95
Nonsense! This is public space, and as such, we need to fight for our words and ideas to circulate freely in it. Thoseo who have garbage in their heads should be free to expose that--it is the rets of us who can and should see it for what it is and dismiss it.
I stand behinf my right to say what I need to say. Hopefully, there are intellignet and non-sexist folks out there (yes, even in Pakistan!)--who can apprecaite and critique what women like me have to say without falling into the gutter.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#98 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 2:58:31 pm
Re: # 97

Believe me, any woman posting intelligent ideas will be dragged through the gutter-her punishment for daring to transcend the mediocrity of this website.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#99 Posted by stuka on July 6, 2007 3:16:59 pm
Stop Lying, Neembu.

By the way, why don`t you boycott Chowk for a change. That in itself would do a lot to raise the standards of Chowk quite a bit.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#100 Posted by Folio on July 6, 2007 3:51:02 pm
Though the article lengthy, it`s not boring but very interesting. It`s interesting as it`s done a few days b4 this historic event of the Operations Silence.

Seen in the backdrop of the full canvas of Pakistan, it`s a small event but a first step towards cleaning- up jihadism from Pakistan. However if we see it from the pov of Musharraf`s record it`s a commando action with no logical purpose but to take revenge for the vengeful acts of Lal Masjid and it`s sister concerns.

Operation Silnce is a flsh in the pan. Wish it`s not!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#101 Posted by Folio on July 6, 2007 3:54:02 pm
Lal Masjid and its sister concerns.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#102 Posted by dullabhatti on July 6, 2007 4:02:06 pm
What I find amazing is how Pak goverment is playing footsie with the Islamic radicals...giving them month after month to change their position...talk after talk..communciation after communication..messenger after messenger, negotiation after negotiation..just because these are islamic radicals...no other dissenting group in Pakistan history has ever gotten such royal treatment..not bengalis, not Balochi leftists, not balochi tribalists, not mohajjirs...none. Message is clear, as long as you bark religious sermons and rhetoric, we will treat you better and give every chance to not confront you...even when you are responsible for getting 20 people killed, we will try not to hurt you but worry about where you and your old mother are going to be living.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#103 Posted by dullabhatti on July 6, 2007 4:09:06 pm
neembu, kiya jabbliyaN maarn Dai ain? after looking at her picture who would not say she is beautiful. You seem to be jealous of her looks in addition to her intellect.:) saRh matt..nothing 10 years of more schooling and regular gym trips can`t fix.:)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#104 Posted by hamidm2 on July 6, 2007 4:45:39 pm
Re: # 95

saminasha,

..... i think you are being extremely unfair with your silly sharptonian knee jerk reaction ...... what about people like me who think that fauzia afzal khan has done an excellent job with her expose` on jamia hafsa ???

........ i hate to see this, but folks like you give people like us a bad name .......... shame on you !............ with friends like you, who needs enemies !
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#105 Posted by sharmeelee on July 6, 2007 4:54:33 pm
Neembu,
In #18 you welcome Fawzia Khan and in #95 you advice her against writing for Chowk. Please make up your mind and do something right for once, otherwise you strengthen the male point that women are unfit to think for themselves.

your sister in sistahood.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#106 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 5:01:51 pm
Re: # 99

Stuka Sahib,

Are you claiming that you did NOT post a ``hysterical laughter`` ikaaan after ali`s comment that Dr. Afzal-Khan looks like a porn star?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#107 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 5:04:33 pm
Re: # 105

Dear S.,

I`m afraid I`m not concerned about what chowk namards think about women. I am however concerned at the culture of sexual harrassment enabled at chowk, and I am not the only female interactor here who is tired of it.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#108 Posted by KaalChakra on July 6, 2007 5:21:20 pm
fak0912

Have we seen this article or something like it elsewhere?

Further,

(1) In future, please be merciful with the length of your submissions to Chowk. Chowk editors don`t have time to read. Sometimes we, the captive audience, like to read.

(2) Don`t drag gutter into the gutter. It`s our domicile.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#109 Posted by stuka on July 6, 2007 5:30:22 pm
``
#105 by sharmeelee on July 6, 2007 4:54pm PT
Neembu,
In #18 you welcome Fawzia Khan and in #95 you advice her against writing for Chowk. Please make up your mind and do something right for once, otherwise you strengthen the male point that women are unfit to think for themselves.

your sister in sistahood.``


HAHAHA..
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#110 Posted by anil on July 6, 2007 5:36:07 pm
Zeemax Sahib:

Humanity does not stop at the boundary of a religion. The time of gun totting part being sanctioned by any religion is over. Both believers and non-believers will not tolerate any longer, and will cooperate. Therefore, Mullah dream of grabbing power in Pakistan is not real. The sooner gun-totters wake out of their worst nightmare, the better it is for all.

This violent gun totting part will be purged in your life time by none other than your own compatriots and believers.

Musharraff`s steps point to a beginning, what he is doing, in my view, will ensure what even the practitioners of violence in the name of Islam call peaceful Islam will emerge. The sooner this message is understood by such practitioners and they relearn their Koran, the better will be, or they should be ready to be marginalized to remote areas where they won`t bother anyone and no one will bother them. There have been white movement groups in the U.S., only time they got wiped out were, when they blew up Murrah building in Oklahoma and like.

In this case choice is yours and intellectuals like you, Echo and Urstruly to guide sense into Mullahs. Fawzia`s of the world will go into the center of such den and bring out a peek for all others. Next time some will go with a hidden camera and recorder inside those brain-washing machines.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#111 Posted by KaalChakra on July 6, 2007 5:49:56 pm
anil ji

The only reason zeemax has been reticent about using his full repertoire of weapons in this fight is that he is still bogged down a little in his dharati prem and dharati dharma.

Were Islamists to follow the methods they have followed in other countries, they can be more effective, and ultimately succeed quicker.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#112 Posted by neembu on July 6, 2007 7:06:24 pm
Re: # 104

Hamid Sahib,

Do you not see the parrallels b/n the Lal Masjid and FP? A bunch of self important middle aged men laying claim to the world and ridiculing women who contradict their world view?

In making the interactors here ``look bad``, I barely need to lift a finger. :)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#113 Posted by tahmed32 on July 6, 2007 7:16:00 pm
zeemax #90 ``please tell me how do you end military rule without deciding whom to put in its place?``

Simple. Do something along the lines of what the Chief Justice says. Namely, that Musharraf can run for President, but after announcing that he is retiring from the military. Or else, he can announce that he will not step down as president in 2008, and stay on as military chief and wait until the next president is elected.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#114 Posted by tahmed32 on July 6, 2007 7:17:20 pm
in #113 it should read ``he will step down as president in 2008``.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#115 Posted by tahmed32 on July 6,