Preventing More Lal Masjids

#730 Posted by krishna_abcd

karishan baby

so you are creating awarness in us??? you must be kidding...

karishna son of stampede crowd...what paki muslim guys here can discuss/think would be unimaginable for even a billion zoo full of hindu gods.

You heard that right,

When I said "booked"..I meant that the man wishing to marry must be "booked"..be of Al-Kitaab..which word is exclusively used for the Qura'an ( Al-Kitaab; Zaal-i-kul Kitaab: This, the-book)

and again I'm thankful to you. Perhaps It appeared ambiguous entirely due to my penchant of having fun with words.

Instead of relying on Madrassa-material, and printed products of the Pakistani Islamist machinery, why don't YOU cite chapter and verse from authentic sources, old fart?

By the way. There was no winged creature in a cave that communicated with ol' mo. The whole thing was made up to hoodwink and control barbaric bedouins. There are no flying angels. No houris to comb your grey pubic hairs. No pre-pubescent "untouched like pearls" little boys. No bearded guy waiting to embrace you.

Nothing, old man. You have wasted your time banging your head on the ground praying to a fiction of mo's imagination. He hoodwinked all you guys while boinking anything he could lay his hands on, left, right and center.

All you guys are deserving of pity. I feel sorry for you.

Re:#727 Posted by echoboom on July 16, 2007 9:48:13 am

well...yes...but in womon's case its not allowed with ahlai-kitaab' men either????

man can marry women of ahl-kitaab' but women can marry only muslims...that's what i have heard...isnt it???

Re: # 726
Persecution of Buddhists started during "Pusyamitra Sunga". Go read a book in a reputed Library. Any idiot like you can edit the wikipedia.

haideri

#725 Posted by philosopher on July 16, 2007 8:59:33 am
It simply means those who do not follow " Al-Kitaab"..the Quraan.

thanks for seeking this clarification..

#698 haideri

[Who screwed the peace loving Buddhist after the fall of Gupta?

It were Hindus who kicked them out and confined them to the border areas.

Why were peace loving Buddhist persecuted?

They refused to accept Brahma and Vedas bullshit]


Here's a clue for you, ignorant islamist old fart:

From wikipedia:

Nalanda was one of the world's first residential universities, i.e., it had dormitories for students. In its heyday it accommodated over 10,000 students and 2,000 teachers. The university was considered an "architectural masterpiece," and was marked by a lofty wall and one gate. Nalanda had eight separate compounds and ten temples, along with many other meditation halls and classrooms. On the grounds were lakes and parks. The library was located in a nine storied building where meticulous copies of texts were produced. The subjects taught at Nalanda University covered every field of learning, and it attracted pupils and scholars from Korea, Japan, China, Tibet, Indonesia, Persia and Turkey.[4] The Tang Dynasty Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang left detailed accounts of the university in the 7th century.



Influence on Buddhism

A vast amount of what is considered to be Tibetan Buddhism (Vajrayana) actually stems from the late (9th-12th century) Nalanda teachers and traditions. Other forms of Buddhism, like the Mahayana followed in Vietnam, China, Korea and Japan, found their genesis within the walls of the ancient university.

Also Theravada Buddhism was taught at Nalanda University. But the teachings of Theravada were not developed further in Nalanda, as Nalanda was not a strong center of Theravada.


Decline and End

In 1193, the Nalanda University complex was sacked by Turkic Muslim invaders under Bakhtiyar Khilji; this event is seen as a milestone in the decline of Buddhism in India. It is said that Khilji asked if there was a copy of the Koran at Nalanda before he sacked it[citation needed]. When the Tibetan translator Chag Lotsawa visited them in 1235, he found them damaged and looted, but still functioning with a small number of monks. The destruction of the universities at Nalanda, as well as the destruction of many temples and monasteries throughout northern India which housed centers of learning, is considered by many historians to be responsible for the sudden demise of ancient Indian scientific thought in mathematics, astronomy, alchemy, and anatomy.[17] Fortified Sena monasteries along the main route of the invasion were destroyed, and being off the main route both Nalanda and Bodh Gaya survived. Many institutions off the main route such as the Jagaddala Monastery in northern Bengal were untouched and flourishing.

#724 Posted by echoboom

((((Islam does not allow a muslim woman marrying someone who is not ’’Booked’’))))

Dada will you please explain it??? what is ''booked'??

from my "prison-diary"
IN praise of Dost-Mittar
..................................
Dost-mittar:647
P.S. I will be disappointed if you don’t add me to your list of Hate Pandits.
_________________________________________________________
Dost
Mullata tahmed32 had not received this size shoe on his face up till now.

p.s: Mulla is a GOOD word; Pandit-hate is GOOD word ( use them often) but Mullata is the Cantonment Mullato* who is the ONLY one who preaches on this site.... Hence he is Mullata ( bad word ; use it often for him only)

* use www.dictionary.com

Dost:
Islam does not allow a muslim woman marrying someone who is not ’’Booked’’..In the absence of Shariah it does happen, that someone takes the law into their own hands...Once muslims have their own laws & send the stupid Britto-Baboon law to the gallows..life will be OK.

Anyone trying to put a spin on this clear , explicit, and un-interpretable Quranic injunction is not only a non-muslim but also is your worst enemy you can ever think of.

He is a kanjaroon..BEWARE!

Did the same brilliant person who advised Mushy to act swiftly against the Lal Masjid inmates also advise Chowk to change it's format?

The new format is hard on the eyes of this old man. Please switch to the old format or I won't be visiting the chowk anymore

#708:masadi
Of course "let him who will believe, and let him who will disbelieve"...is correct.

First of all it does not mean that a muslim should be a "citizen" of Islam & follow a different "constituition" at different times of the day. This is meant for non-muslims who should not & must not be asked to relinquish their belief system. As long as a MUSLIM or a non-muslim does not,
by words or deeds, try to be seditious or an apostate, and thus bring harm to muslims he is free to discuss even the most taboo subject within the right fora..as was done throughout the muslim world before we became the pariah dogs...precisely by NOT FOLLOWING these injunctions and preferred to be appeasers & apologists.

I love the fact that you can skip the article and go to the interacts!

'Former chowk' staff

If you guys don't switch back to my beloved original chowk in next couple of days....i will boycott this website....

This is not the chowk i love.

Re: # 717

arjun2

(((alert('new format sucks'). The new format sucks.)))

Agreed...alert('new format sucks'). The new format sucks.

alert('new format sucks'). The new format sucks.

alert('new format sucks'). The new format sucks.