Pervez Hoodbhoy July 10, 2007
#13 Posted by hamidm2 on July 10, 2007 11:28:46 am
Re: # 10
zeemax,
...... the chowk staff is just toying with him - they let him out once in a while so that he can make a complete fool out of himself and then throw him back into his padded cell ..........
zeemax,
...... the chowk staff is just toying with him - they let him out once in a while so that he can make a complete fool out of himself and then throw him back into his padded cell ..........
#10 Posted by zeemax on July 10, 2007 11:22:05 am
#6 by echoboom,
What the hell is going out? Are you filtered or not?
What the hell is going out? Are you filtered or not?
#11 Posted by hamidm2 on July 10, 2007 11:25:39 am
dr hoodbhoy,
....... i agree with your analysis, but the solution you are proposing is `too little, too late` .......... it will take a lot more work to cure this deep-rooted affliction ........ as tom friedman points out, the cause of this affliciton is quite complex :
Two trends are at work here: humiliation and atomization. Islam’s self-identity is that it is the most perfect and complete expression of God’s monotheistic message, and the Koran is God’s last and most perfect word. To put it another way, young Muslims are raised on the view that Islam is God 3.0. Christianity is God 2.0. Judaism is God 1.0. And Hinduism and all others are God 0.0.
One of the factors driving Muslim males, particularly educated ones, into these acts of extreme, expressive violence is that while they were taught that they have the most perfect and complete operating system, every day they’re confronted with the reality that people living by God 2.0., God 1.0 and God 0.0 are generally living much more prosperously, powerfully and democratically than those living under Islam. This creates a real dissonance and humiliation. How could this be? Who did this to us? The Crusaders! The Jews! The West! It can never be something that they failed to learn, adapt to or build. This humiliation produces a lashing out.
#14 Posted by GT on July 10, 2007 11:30:16 am
I feel a bit cheated. I had promised not to interact till echo is unbanned. I saw post 1 and so wrote post 8. But again I see that echo has been banned. Well, I gues, I need to say bye-bye too.
But before I do so, I do need to state that posts much more offensive than those by echo are flooding interacts here. If liberals, I am assuming that chowk staff is liberal, do not have it in them to take in echo`s barrage .... then it is indeed a sad day for liberalism. At the expense of being a bit dramatic let me say that we will loose the forthcomming war, precisely because of this attitude.
But before I do so, I do need to state that posts much more offensive than those by echo are flooding interacts here. If liberals, I am assuming that chowk staff is liberal, do not have it in them to take in echo`s barrage .... then it is indeed a sad day for liberalism. At the expense of being a bit dramatic let me say that we will loose the forthcomming war, precisely because of this attitude.
#15 Posted by zeemax on July 10, 2007 11:30:17 am
Very interesting ... the MMA member NA is referring to Abdul Rashid Ghazi as Abdul Ghazi Shaheed Rahmat`ullah Alaih on the Hamid Mir show on GEO, and Ejaz-Ul-Haq actually wept in his remembrance on live TV with tears flowing down his cheeks.
Echo was right on the other board. Abdul Rashid has already become an icon.
Echo was right on the other board. Abdul Rashid has already become an icon.
#16 Posted by MantoLives on July 10, 2007 11:30:18 am
``are now killing you``
Well quite clearly this is too optimistic from an Indian angle.
Well quite clearly this is too optimistic from an Indian angle.
#17 Posted by zeemax on July 10, 2007 11:33:01 am
#7 by echoboom,
Echoboom reply to this. Are you in or out?
Echoboom reply to this. Are you in or out?
#18 Posted by zeemax on July 10, 2007 11:34:24 am
#13 by hamidm2,
It appears not all agree with your opinion. See GT`s post below.
It appears not all agree with your opinion. See GT`s post below.
#20 Posted by arjun2 on July 10, 2007 11:36:51 am
#16 by Mantolives on July 10, 2007 11:30am PT
the jihadis killed 800+ of your soldiers and forced you to retreat from the tribal areas..hence the need for the CIA hellfires to do the needful...
this is a fact...reality isn`t optimistic or pessimistic...
the jihadis killed 800+ of your soldiers and forced you to retreat from the tribal areas..hence the need for the CIA hellfires to do the needful...
this is a fact...reality isn`t optimistic or pessimistic...
#21 Posted by arjun2 on July 10, 2007 11:38:20 am
his karma index is still 0 which means he is banned...chowk stafff is lurking, modding up his posts...
#23 Posted by FarzanaVersey on July 10, 2007 11:54:32 am
Dr. Hoodbhoy:
If you are speaking from the idealistic POV, then Pakistan will need to change its Constitution. If it is practical considerations (poverty, illiteracy), then even if you wipe out all the madrassas, will the mindset change? You yourself mention the failure of BB and NS to bring about change.
[Imperial America’s policies in the Muslim world are usually held to blame. But its brutalities elsewhere have been far greater. In tiny Vietnam, the Americans had killed more than one million people. Nevertheless, the Vietnamese did not invest in explosive vests and belts. Today if one could wipe America off the map of the world with a wet cloth, mullah-led fanaticism will not disappear.]
This is a disingenuous comparison. Vietnam was not being used the way Pakistan is by the US, which is not a new phenomenon. It isn`t ``imperial America`s policies`` but crusading American policies that have exacerbated the problems. However, the Pakistan problem has essentially to do with prudence, unlike Afghanistan or Iraq or Iran. The mullahs of the Lal Masjid were fighting the Establishment within. Activists do it for different reasons. So, we are talking about ideology, more specifically the ideologies of disparate groups.
Pakistani fanaticism can most certainly not be seen as perfectly representative of Islamic fundamentalism, which has at its very basis an anti-colonial stance.
[The government’s madrassa reform program has fallen flat on its face, and future efforts will do no better. It was absurd to have assumed that introducing computers or teaching English could have transformed the character of madrassa education away from brain-washing and rote memorization towards logical behaviour and critical thinking. Did the adeptness with which Lal Masjid managed its website really bring it into the 21st century? Madrassas are religious institutions; they cannot be changed into normal schools. It is time to give up wasting money and effort in attempting to reform them and, instead, to radically improve the public education system and make it a viable alternative.]
Change is usually slow. Knowledge of English (despite skewed and bad spelling) has not altered the face of American `fundamentalism`, which is essentially xenophobic. What you call normal schools may equip people with a scientific knowledge but not a scientific temperament. The best bombs are not crude bombs. And then we do have doctors at work, too.
There is a resurgence of fanatical forces in all religious streams of thought. Blair is getting to be in love with catholicism, Hinduism has found its ancient heritage delectable enough to eat, and the Dalai Lama too is giving speeches that don`t sound sweet.
The Lal Masjid situation is only one of Pakistan`s hiccups.
If you are speaking from the idealistic POV, then Pakistan will need to change its Constitution. If it is practical considerations (poverty, illiteracy), then even if you wipe out all the madrassas, will the mindset change? You yourself mention the failure of BB and NS to bring about change.
[Imperial America’s policies in the Muslim world are usually held to blame. But its brutalities elsewhere have been far greater. In tiny Vietnam, the Americans had killed more than one million people. Nevertheless, the Vietnamese did not invest in explosive vests and belts. Today if one could wipe America off the map of the world with a wet cloth, mullah-led fanaticism will not disappear.]
This is a disingenuous comparison. Vietnam was not being used the way Pakistan is by the US, which is not a new phenomenon. It isn`t ``imperial America`s policies`` but crusading American policies that have exacerbated the problems. However, the Pakistan problem has essentially to do with prudence, unlike Afghanistan or Iraq or Iran. The mullahs of the Lal Masjid were fighting the Establishment within. Activists do it for different reasons. So, we are talking about ideology, more specifically the ideologies of disparate groups.
Pakistani fanaticism can most certainly not be seen as perfectly representative of Islamic fundamentalism, which has at its very basis an anti-colonial stance.
[The government’s madrassa reform program has fallen flat on its face, and future efforts will do no better. It was absurd to have assumed that introducing computers or teaching English could have transformed the character of madrassa education away from brain-washing and rote memorization towards logical behaviour and critical thinking. Did the adeptness with which Lal Masjid managed its website really bring it into the 21st century? Madrassas are religious institutions; they cannot be changed into normal schools. It is time to give up wasting money and effort in attempting to reform them and, instead, to radically improve the public education system and make it a viable alternative.]
Change is usually slow. Knowledge of English (despite skewed and bad spelling) has not altered the face of American `fundamentalism`, which is essentially xenophobic. What you call normal schools may equip people with a scientific knowledge but not a scientific temperament. The best bombs are not crude bombs. And then we do have doctors at work, too.
There is a resurgence of fanatical forces in all religious streams of thought. Blair is getting to be in love with catholicism, Hinduism has found its ancient heritage delectable enough to eat, and the Dalai Lama too is giving speeches that don`t sound sweet.
The Lal Masjid situation is only one of Pakistan`s hiccups.
#25 Posted by Folio on July 10, 2007 12:08:45 pm
There are conflicting reports abt the death of Maulana Ghazi. The last talk of Maulana Ghazi with Geo TV indicates that he`s killed by the secutity forces but not by the militants.
>>>A bullet had hit in a leg of Ghazi during gunfire and he was also asked to surrender after he was injured but he refused and was ultimately killed, some sources said.
Mr. Ghazi was killed in firing by some militants who were hiding along with him when he came out of a bunker and was heading to surrender, the other reports said.
Meanwhile, Interior Secretary Syed Kamal Shah has confirmed that the deputy chief of Lal mosque Abdul Rasheed Ghazi was killed in operation silence lunched against the militants holed up in the Lal mosque.
Ghazi was killed in a bunker as a result of cross firing during the operation silence, he said while talking to Gen News.
(http://thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=25725)
<<<
Going by the YouTube videos and several TV interviews of Ghazi it`s clear that he`s a cool customer with little emotions BUT stuck to his inflexibility when it mattered.
It`s also apparant that he`s staying in the company of children and women inorder to prevent the forces that are on prowl to attack him.
The purported `last ditch attempt` by the Govt to have muzakaraat with Ghazi is a ploy to locate him in the huge complex of Lal Masjid. As for what Tariq Azim said abt having talks with him and the reported despatch of mobiles to him for that purpose is a technical method to locate him pinpointedly. It`s immediatley after this location of Ghazi, the security forces made their attack and got him killed.
>>>A bullet had hit in a leg of Ghazi during gunfire and he was also asked to surrender after he was injured but he refused and was ultimately killed, some sources said.
Mr. Ghazi was killed in firing by some militants who were hiding along with him when he came out of a bunker and was heading to surrender, the other reports said.
Meanwhile, Interior Secretary Syed Kamal Shah has confirmed that the deputy chief of Lal mosque Abdul Rasheed Ghazi was killed in operation silence lunched against the militants holed up in the Lal mosque.
Ghazi was killed in a bunker as a result of cross firing during the operation silence, he said while talking to Gen News.
(http://thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=25725)
<<<
Going by the YouTube videos and several TV interviews of Ghazi it`s clear that he`s a cool customer with little emotions BUT stuck to his inflexibility when it mattered.
It`s also apparant that he`s staying in the company of children and women inorder to prevent the forces that are on prowl to attack him.
The purported `last ditch attempt` by the Govt to have muzakaraat with Ghazi is a ploy to locate him in the huge complex of Lal Masjid. As for what Tariq Azim said abt having talks with him and the reported despatch of mobiles to him for that purpose is a technical method to locate him pinpointedly. It`s immediatley after this location of Ghazi, the security forces made their attack and got him killed.
#27 Posted by KaalChakra on July 10, 2007 12:10:57 pm
[This is a disingenuous comparison. Vietnam was not being used the way Pakistan is by the US, which is not a new phenomenon. It isn`t ``imperial America`s policies`` but crusading American policies that have exacerbated the problems. However, the Pakistan problem has essentially to do with prudence, unlike Afghanistan or Iraq or Iran. The mullahs of the Lal Masjid were fighting the Establishment within. Activists do it for different reasons. So, we are talking about ideology, more specifically the ideologies of disparate groups.
Pakistani fanaticism can most certainly not be seen as perfectly representative of Islamic fundamentalism, which has at its very basis an anti-colonial stance.]
I don`t know about others but I did not at all get this.
In place of Vietnam, one could include almost all of South America, which the US has been running as its fiefdom for decades. And Philippines had been a real American colony for a long time. Their response too has been different from that of Islamic world.
It seems internal ideology is an important factor. Is that what you meant by ``ideologies of disparate groups``?
Pakistani fanaticism can most certainly not be seen as perfectly representative of Islamic fundamentalism, which has at its very basis an anti-colonial stance.]
I don`t know about others but I did not at all get this.
In place of Vietnam, one could include almost all of South America, which the US has been running as its fiefdom for decades. And Philippines had been a real American colony for a long time. Their response too has been different from that of Islamic world.
It seems internal ideology is an important factor. Is that what you meant by ``ideologies of disparate groups``?
#28 Posted by Urstruly on July 10, 2007 12:11:33 pm
Today, Pakistani nation has achieved its first milestone towards its freedom from the oppression of British colonial proxy ruling class and agents of neo-colonialism. This is a milestone because it has effectively drawn the separating line between two Pakistans - the opppressors and the oppressed. There remains no blurr now; no grey zone. This is the first absolute step towards revolution when people start seeing clearly - their objectives, their enemies, and their goals.
Na Pak fouj has a sepcial knack for initiating revolutions. The independence movement in East pakistan only reached at a point of no return when Na Pak fouj massacred students and teachers of Dhakka University on the fateful day of March 25, 1971. In recent past several months Na Pak faouj attacked many schools in the remaining terrotries of Pakistan and killed hundereds. Jamiah Hafsa and Lal Masjid are the point of no return for remaining Pakistan.
The similarity in rhetoric and attitude of ruling elite class is just uncanny between now and that in 1971. ``Kaalay``, ``Chotay``, and ``Miskeen`` Bengali has now been replaced by ``Dharee Waalay``, ``shlawaron walay``, and ``halva khor``. This is the begining of the end of the occupation of Pakistan by Na Pak fouj.
#29 Posted by arjun2 on July 10, 2007 12:15:29 pm
#22 by neembu on July 10, 2007 11:47am PT
this is what was missed? name calling?
boom`s name calling is more witty, more intelligent and makes more sense than any argument you have presented...ever....
this is what was missed? name calling?
boom`s name calling is more witty, more intelligent and makes more sense than any argument you have presented...ever....
#30 Posted by arjun2 on July 10, 2007 12:17:37 pm
#28 by Urstruly on July 10, 2007 12:11pm PT
Today, Pakistani nation has achieved its first milestone towards its freedom
dude...there`s no milestone..only the gazi guy`s headstone...guess what`ll happen next: mushy will crown himself king for 5 more years..which is cool because that`s what amrika wants..a president and COAS who STFUs when the hellfires rain on the parents of the ninja chix back in the tribal areas...
told you so....
Today, Pakistani nation has achieved its first milestone towards its freedom
dude...there`s no milestone..only the gazi guy`s headstone...guess what`ll happen next: mushy will crown himself king for 5 more years..which is cool because that`s what amrika wants..a president and COAS who STFUs when the hellfires rain on the parents of the ninja chix back in the tribal areas...
told you so....








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content