Bhaskar Dasgupta July 21, 2007
#17 Posted by beady on July 25, 2007 3:22:46 am
#9 Posted by TahirQazi
Tahir Sahib, thank you for your comments. I agree with you wholeheartedly about the Kurd question being more than just Sunni. The history of kurdistan is a long and frequently shameful one. (see an old essay of mine here, http://www.flash-bulletin.de/2003/eSeptember22.htm#5). Oil is indeed a factor in the iraqi imbrogilo and you have identified it as such.
Tahir Sahib, thank you for your comments. I agree with you wholeheartedly about the Kurd question being more than just Sunni. The history of kurdistan is a long and frequently shameful one. (see an old essay of mine here, http://www.flash-bulletin.de/2003/eSeptember22.htm#5). Oil is indeed a factor in the iraqi imbrogilo and you have identified it as such.
#18 Posted by beady on July 25, 2007 3:28:35 am
#10 Posted by Ranjit
Well, an orderly transition. I presume along the lines of India and Pakistan? well, it wasnt orderly at all, and in any case, there are way too many parties involved who are against it. Outside Iraq, Turkey is against it, Syria is against it, most of the Arab lands are against it. Iran is ok with it but not with kurdistan coming into play. Internally, you dont have a hope in hell of convincing the sunni, yazdi's to do this, not the baathists, not the al queda buggers, not the tribal chiefs. The SCIRI might be willing to do so, but again, i dont think the mahdi army guys would like it..... And even if it was possible right after the invasion, it most certainly is not right now. And the UN, Arab League or even OIC dont have the troops, money, will or guts to step in to drive something like partition down the throats of the various groups.
Well, an orderly transition. I presume along the lines of India and Pakistan? well, it wasnt orderly at all, and in any case, there are way too many parties involved who are against it. Outside Iraq, Turkey is against it, Syria is against it, most of the Arab lands are against it. Iran is ok with it but not with kurdistan coming into play. Internally, you dont have a hope in hell of convincing the sunni, yazdi's to do this, not the baathists, not the al queda buggers, not the tribal chiefs. The SCIRI might be willing to do so, but again, i dont think the mahdi army guys would like it..... And even if it was possible right after the invasion, it most certainly is not right now. And the UN, Arab League or even OIC dont have the troops, money, will or guts to step in to drive something like partition down the throats of the various groups.
#19 Posted by beady on July 25, 2007 3:30:40 am
#11 Posted by HP
you are right. At that moment in 2002, it was Plan Rumsfeld all over. March in, kick saddam out, put in chalabi, put in some vague governing federal structure and walk out bearing bottles of shaat al arab water. Now look where they are!
you are right. At that moment in 2002, it was Plan Rumsfeld all over. March in, kick saddam out, put in chalabi, put in some vague governing federal structure and walk out bearing bottles of shaat al arab water. Now look where they are!
#20 Posted by beady on July 25, 2007 3:33:20 am
#16 Posted by iron_mask
well, i would advice slight caution. That's what the interim administration did, went for complete de-baathification. Not good, it created huge problems.
Also, shia democracy is not like what we know as democracy in the west or even in india. its guided democracy to put it politely. Sunni democracy, well, less said the better.
well, i would advice slight caution. That's what the interim administration did, went for complete de-baathification. Not good, it created huge problems.
Also, shia democracy is not like what we know as democracy in the west or even in india. its guided democracy to put it politely. Sunni democracy, well, less said the better.
#21 Posted by iron_mask on July 25, 2007 3:56:12 am
Re: # 20
that is why I find it astonishing that the US admin thinks it could do it in 4 years. It needs a much more longer term thinking - its not a short term thing.
Maybe something like the Shia democracy (I donot want to use the other word here for obvious reasons ;) )should be the option here.
Who knows, Crystal ball gazing is best left to the people who can do it!
that is why I find it astonishing that the US admin thinks it could do it in 4 years. It needs a much more longer term thinking - its not a short term thing.
Maybe something like the Shia democracy (I donot want to use the other word here for obvious reasons ;) )should be the option here.
Who knows, Crystal ball gazing is best left to the people who can do it!
#22 Posted by jayp on July 25, 2007 4:22:18 am
beady,
Leaders do not happen, they are created by the people. For leaders to emerge, there has to be some dominant social value and any one that exudes that value emerge as a leader, in response to the hopes and aspirations of its people.
No islamic country can have a leader, because the ultimate is to follow the book. There is no flexibility, there is no dominant value other than literally do what is in the book.
Where there is prescriptive book to follow, as in India, it creates heros, it can make an Albanian Chrisitan into a saint, mother theresa. It can make an italian woman to a national hero and give the chair that a mahatma occupied.
That is why there is no hope for pakistan, no hope for any islamic state, they have to become theocratic states.
Leaders do not happen, they are created by the people. For leaders to emerge, there has to be some dominant social value and any one that exudes that value emerge as a leader, in response to the hopes and aspirations of its people.
No islamic country can have a leader, because the ultimate is to follow the book. There is no flexibility, there is no dominant value other than literally do what is in the book.
Where there is prescriptive book to follow, as in India, it creates heros, it can make an Albanian Chrisitan into a saint, mother theresa. It can make an italian woman to a national hero and give the chair that a mahatma occupied.
That is why there is no hope for pakistan, no hope for any islamic state, they have to become theocratic states.
#23 Posted by KaalChakra on July 25, 2007 8:29:20 am
"US admin thinks it could do it in 4 years"
iron_mask, in religions-cultural terms the US administration and the American people in general are the most ignorant of the lot. Worse, they cocky about their own ignorance - much like our dime-a-dozen Hindu secularists.
They will always be used by smart outsiders. The saving grace from American point of view is that ultimately, the US being relatively so strong, they are still able to get their way.
iron_mask, in religions-cultural terms the US administration and the American people in general are the most ignorant of the lot. Worse, they cocky about their own ignorance - much like our dime-a-dozen Hindu secularists.
They will always be used by smart outsiders. The saving grace from American point of view is that ultimately, the US being relatively so strong, they are still able to get their way.
#24 Posted by jang on July 25, 2007 8:45:15 am
biggest mistake of the bush admin was not so much not getting enough international support (coalition of the willing) while going in but not getting enough of banias in after going in (calling europeans old and denying them the war booty AKA reconstruction ).
#25 Posted by Ranjit on July 25, 2007 9:20:26 am
Re:beady#18 and harish_hyd
"Well, an orderly transition. I presume along the lines of India and Pakistan?"
The India-Pakistan partition was a good idea that was terribly executed by the british. At the end of the day, both Indians and Pakistanis are very happy with the way things turned out, in fact the Indians are overjoyed at the prospect of not dealing with the kind of crap that Pak society/army is dealing with these days.
I was referring to the Yugoslavian model that was executed very systematically by US and NATO. A deal was reached, borders were demarcated, peacekeepers were deployed and everyone is happy since then.
Coming to the point of external parties, since when has the US cared about their opinions? It can just tell them to take a hike and parition the country since it has physical possession of it. The internal stakeholders will comply since they will immediately get a chance to get power. The Kurds are doing quite well. The Sunnis would prefer to get their own place to rule rather than play second fiddle to the shias and see their people die every day. The Shias may not mind either since it will mean the end of suicide bombings by sunnis. The jihadis are not a party to any dispute and are a "microority" anyway. What we see in Iraq is basically a sectrian civil war. Either one party wins completely like the US civil war, or the parties get tired like in lebanon or they need to be separated physically. If the US doesnt leave, no party can win anything. No one is tired of the fighting either since the US is managing to keep some level of control. Therefore the only option is to separate them out.
The one key thing is to ensure equitable oil revenue sharing and the US can force that on all the three parties. The other thing is to have peacekeepers. That is where the UN, NATO and muslim countries can be pulled in if the US shows leadership. At the end of the day, either the US does this or it will suffer a humiliating loss. It will just retreat and we will see an orgy of a civil war happening along the lines of Lebanon for years in Iraq.
"Well, an orderly transition. I presume along the lines of India and Pakistan?"
The India-Pakistan partition was a good idea that was terribly executed by the british. At the end of the day, both Indians and Pakistanis are very happy with the way things turned out, in fact the Indians are overjoyed at the prospect of not dealing with the kind of crap that Pak society/army is dealing with these days.
I was referring to the Yugoslavian model that was executed very systematically by US and NATO. A deal was reached, borders were demarcated, peacekeepers were deployed and everyone is happy since then.
Coming to the point of external parties, since when has the US cared about their opinions? It can just tell them to take a hike and parition the country since it has physical possession of it. The internal stakeholders will comply since they will immediately get a chance to get power. The Kurds are doing quite well. The Sunnis would prefer to get their own place to rule rather than play second fiddle to the shias and see their people die every day. The Shias may not mind either since it will mean the end of suicide bombings by sunnis. The jihadis are not a party to any dispute and are a "microority" anyway. What we see in Iraq is basically a sectrian civil war. Either one party wins completely like the US civil war, or the parties get tired like in lebanon or they need to be separated physically. If the US doesnt leave, no party can win anything. No one is tired of the fighting either since the US is managing to keep some level of control. Therefore the only option is to separate them out.
The one key thing is to ensure equitable oil revenue sharing and the US can force that on all the three parties. The other thing is to have peacekeepers. That is where the UN, NATO and muslim countries can be pulled in if the US shows leadership. At the end of the day, either the US does this or it will suffer a humiliating loss. It will just retreat and we will see an orgy of a civil war happening along the lines of Lebanon for years in Iraq.
#26 Posted by mohar11 on July 25, 2007 11:18:45 am
Ranjit
Makes sense... that may be the only viable option left...
Makes sense... that may be the only viable option left...
#27 Posted by beady on July 25, 2007 12:29:52 pm
Ranjit #25
Given the utter and total incompetent mess that the US has made with Iraq with its basic peace keeping and national administration, I am not confident at all that it can replicate a yoguslavia here.
Second, it requires a sustained decades long multi-national effort to make sure that yoguslavia works, and i cant see that happening in Iraq, not the funding, not the people, not the police, not anything.
Third, yoguslavia succeeded because the pressure on all the 3 parties worked, everybody was getting something out of it. In this case, while I can see the kurds and possibly the SICRI group getting something out of partition, I cant see what turkey, iran, the mahdi army, the other arabs, etc. getting out of it, so it will be a bit of an issue.
Fourth, the crux of the matter, i simply cannot see how an equitable distribution can be established. Why on earth would the kurds give up their share of the oil to the sunni's in a different country or shia to the sunni's? or or or or.
Not very sure that it will work. In any case, i cannot see or hear any legitimate backing to this idea in any corner of the USA at all. So lord only knows who will push it? The republicans? nope. Democrats? nops. So not very hopeful i am afraid.
cheers
bd
Given the utter and total incompetent mess that the US has made with Iraq with its basic peace keeping and national administration, I am not confident at all that it can replicate a yoguslavia here.
Second, it requires a sustained decades long multi-national effort to make sure that yoguslavia works, and i cant see that happening in Iraq, not the funding, not the people, not the police, not anything.
Third, yoguslavia succeeded because the pressure on all the 3 parties worked, everybody was getting something out of it. In this case, while I can see the kurds and possibly the SICRI group getting something out of partition, I cant see what turkey, iran, the mahdi army, the other arabs, etc. getting out of it, so it will be a bit of an issue.
Fourth, the crux of the matter, i simply cannot see how an equitable distribution can be established. Why on earth would the kurds give up their share of the oil to the sunni's in a different country or shia to the sunni's? or or or or.
Not very sure that it will work. In any case, i cannot see or hear any legitimate backing to this idea in any corner of the USA at all. So lord only knows who will push it? The republicans? nope. Democrats? nops. So not very hopeful i am afraid.
cheers
bd
#28 Posted by sattar2 on July 25, 2007 2:01:39 pm
This just in …
A few days ago Bush got checked for colon cancer. Doctors found nothing alarming. They did find one lump that Bush has not been able to pass. It is being investigated further, but for now, the doctors are calling it "Iraq".
A few days ago Bush got checked for colon cancer. Doctors found nothing alarming. They did find one lump that Bush has not been able to pass. It is being investigated further, but for now, the doctors are calling it "Iraq".
#29 Posted by ahmedmadani on July 25, 2007 5:03:40 pm
Its not a theocratic state but Islamic Republics of Pakistan. The country has given constitution by founding member / mr.Bhutto of 1973. Which is living documrnt and will change with time and will be modified as needed. The constitution is basic document for all muslim nations including India and others who want to improve the law and order situation by useing this Bhutto constition. Look at Pakistan market is defying gravity and going up like crszy and higest reurn on srock.Just few years had highest return on equity market.Economy is booming. Pakisrtannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn n is economy on rise look at realestate, stock market, interst rated, dollars can Indian economy do this it can not. The country is at war against intially India and ussr and that country was oput out od misery by insurgent pakistan, usa and china. And now usa and pakistan are fighting extremist and still easternfront is not cold, Fight fr kashmir is going on on long term. Which economy has done better after taking into account this ongoing war on eastern front and now on eastern front. The terrorist and extremist on run . Soon usa is also going to upgrade military hardwere specially mobility assets like addition of Helicopter gunships which will put terrorist at great advantage and JF aircraft produced by China and pakistan with powerful Russian engines which are same SU-30 the russy most modern air machines engine. I am tired of silly comparison between india and pakistan. India is like fat elephant while pakistan is asian power animal like bengali tiger which can smash any thing and put wild fat elephant out of misery. The economy is expanding at fast rest by absorbing huge foreign investments. Now these rich companies from west and arabland are not stupid to pour billions of dollars fro electricity to car companies and gas and oil production sector is booming like rocket. With defreezing of oil and gas prices and allowed to raise to international levels it is going to country like middle east. Sindh and B.Stan is full of oil and gas. Canadian, usa companies are pouring money in this sector and every month new discoveries. Now Chinese are going to pour money in that sector. World class coal deposits will used by Chinese companies to make power and may be India can get some juice at little concessional price to help poor people of India. Soon power lines will be carrying power from central asia to fuel economy of pakistan. IPI pipe line is coming on line and Indians will be forced to pay $500 million per yer as transit fee. If Indian do not behave properly then Iran Pakistan line will work properly but India pakistan cab burst what India, Iran can do. Precisely nothing . It is in interst of india to solve K problem tp pakistani satisfaction or Pakistanis will control gas from Iran.
Iraq problem can be solved if Muslim armies under UNO are employed and others go home. But long term as Jinnah suggested type solution be implimented as Iraq mind is very hot headed and same with Kurds. Division of Iraq will solve problems like india pakistan. And they will be all right if India pakistan can live Sunni, Shia, Kurd Islamic republics can live. PIA is needed that P(akistan)+I(ran)+A (a.stan) which will be good for pakistani people, afghan and Irani and USA will not be able to threaten PIA as such combination will be very powerful with huge army and atomic bombs and resources and all can move where there is job need etc like europe.
Iraq problem can be solved if Muslim armies under UNO are employed and others go home. But long term as Jinnah suggested type solution be implimented as Iraq mind is very hot headed and same with Kurds. Division of Iraq will solve problems like india pakistan. And they will be all right if India pakistan can live Sunni, Shia, Kurd Islamic republics can live. PIA is needed that P(akistan)+I(ran)+A (a.stan) which will be good for pakistani people, afghan and Irani and USA will not be able to threaten PIA as such combination will be very powerful with huge army and atomic bombs and resources and all can move where there is job need etc like europe.
#30 Posted by Folio on July 25, 2007 5:45:49 pm
Re: # 15
Beady boss,
As 4 showing the finger....King jong Il had been actually showing the dick to Bush....& All American Prezs!
Indiscrimante bombing of Lebanon was uncontested.....occuption of Iraq (though I am happy abt the flattening of Taliban) is another concern....there's nobody in this world to speak, at least.......
The idea of Nehru lingers.....the brightest Kashmiri son of modern India............
& the voice of Sunil Khilnani comes to my mind.
Beady boss,
As 4 showing the finger....King jong Il had been actually showing the dick to Bush....& All American Prezs!
Indiscrimante bombing of Lebanon was uncontested.....occuption of Iraq (though I am happy abt the flattening of Taliban) is another concern....there's nobody in this world to speak, at least.......
The idea of Nehru lingers.....the brightest Kashmiri son of modern India............
& the voice of Sunil Khilnani comes to my mind.
#31 Posted by ahmedmadani on July 25, 2007 6:47:43 pm
Re: # 29
Sorry for english and spelling. I just got up and was sleepy and was feeding cat but now I feel better. People should not read here too much as lots people from enemy cam is trying too demoralise by posting and magnifying stuff fro newspapers but any way thet cj stuff is over. Now real stiff fight is just starting, Lal Mosque ( LM) was just warm up and terrorist are going to suffer lot unless they mend their ways and become civilised and become lawful citizens and general is doing good to country. But liberal anti muslim , antinational and panislamic terrorist want to make here trouble like Iraq and A.stan. They may be able to do that trouble for stort time ungoverned areas but as steel grip of pakistan armed forces becomes tight and as helicopter gunships start making sorties their freedom doing terrorism is going strat shrinking as LM trouble makes undertood in post operation period. At this time they do not understand they are being watched and squeezed just like late Bugti never believed when general said this time B.Terrorist will not understand from where missile struck. I got some info from one army man. It was technological achievement for High tec h. This mr. Bugti had bad habit of talking and army airmachine and usa drone caught him talking to NY times or some foreign press person.American High flying (30,000ft high) Drone was able to find location by High Tech( Longituse and latitude withing 3 feet accuracy) and conveyed to Paf f-15 eagle. And drone programmed and fired missile from f-16 and Bugti was history. Ossama Bin knows that big airmachines from usa and pakistan are looking for his talking once they get that he will be getting missile from F-16. But he defeated by just stop talking on cellular phone. If you do not use modern communication then all modern thing is garbage. Fight with asymmetry. Now he uses donkeys to transport than jeep again they can not catch as donkey is too unsofisticated compared to jeep. Any way time is on side of govt and surly things are getting tough fot terrpor making people. Nehru was not kashmiri he was up Bhayya land person. His skin was dark and he was bald and he had weak body died of heart attack. He was fake secular as proved by his daughter when she attacked pakistan same with his grandson he admitted Nehru family dream was to cyt pakistan to size. Question is can this family be suied in International court for making war palns for years? Only lawyers/ international court experts can write and tell.
Sorry for english and spelling. I just got up and was sleepy and was feeding cat but now I feel better. People should not read here too much as lots people from enemy cam is trying too demoralise by posting and magnifying stuff fro newspapers but any way thet cj stuff is over. Now real stiff fight is just starting, Lal Mosque ( LM) was just warm up and terrorist are going to suffer lot unless they mend their ways and become civilised and become lawful citizens and general is doing good to country. But liberal anti muslim , antinational and panislamic terrorist want to make here trouble like Iraq and A.stan. They may be able to do that trouble for stort time ungoverned areas but as steel grip of pakistan armed forces becomes tight and as helicopter gunships start making sorties their freedom doing terrorism is going strat shrinking as LM trouble makes undertood in post operation period. At this time they do not understand they are being watched and squeezed just like late Bugti never believed when general said this time B.Terrorist will not understand from where missile struck. I got some info from one army man. It was technological achievement for High tec h. This mr. Bugti had bad habit of talking and army airmachine and usa drone caught him talking to NY times or some foreign press person.American High flying (30,000ft high) Drone was able to find location by High Tech( Longituse and latitude withing 3 feet accuracy) and conveyed to Paf f-15 eagle. And drone programmed and fired missile from f-16 and Bugti was history. Ossama Bin knows that big airmachines from usa and pakistan are looking for his talking once they get that he will be getting missile from F-16. But he defeated by just stop talking on cellular phone. If you do not use modern communication then all modern thing is garbage. Fight with asymmetry. Now he uses donkeys to transport than jeep again they can not catch as donkey is too unsofisticated compared to jeep. Any way time is on side of govt and surly things are getting tough fot terrpor making people. Nehru was not kashmiri he was up Bhayya land person. His skin was dark and he was bald and he had weak body died of heart attack. He was fake secular as proved by his daughter when she attacked pakistan same with his grandson he admitted Nehru family dream was to cyt pakistan to size. Question is can this family be suied in International court for making war palns for years? Only lawyers/ international court experts can write and tell.
#32 Posted by nasah on July 26, 2007 6:53:13 pm
Our extremist born-again Christian Knight of the Neo-Convicts Order has not only raped the country but mutilated it beyond recognition and repair -- after the Ugly American leaves the quarry with blood on its hands and a bandaged conscience -- the left over bones and carcass will go to 5 standby muslim dogs plus a chihuahua -- the Iranian dogs -- the Turkish dogs -- the Syrian dogs -- the Jordanian dogs – and the Saudi dog plus the yelping Kuwaiti Chihuahua.
The Kurdish Kuislings are going to be kloberred by three sides as soon the Kurdish Kennel guards leave the area limping -- never to return. This is the Fractured Future of the Messy Little Potamia.
The Kurdish Kuislings are going to be kloberred by three sides as soon the Kurdish Kennel guards leave the area limping -- never to return. This is the Fractured Future of the Messy Little Potamia.
Interact Index
Also by Bhaskar Dasgupta
Similar Articles
- Mind the Gap, The Generation Gap That Is Bhaskar Dasgupta
- Gen. Petraeus & Crocker's Washington Show is a Damp Squib Gajendra Singh
- Fair Game Mohammad Gill
- Will President Bush Invade Iran? Mohammad Gill
- Imperialism and the Writing of History Rohit Chopra
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- MaheshG: Re: # 96 And what... Pleas For Sanity as
- RiazHaq: Since the attacks and... Pleas For Sanity as
- akcheema: Re: # 101 agreed fully... Pleas For Sanity as
- MaheshG: I am glad Tahmed... Pleas For Sanity as
- KHYBER: What Pakistan Government needs... Pleas For Sanity as
- akcheema: Re: # 96 I know... Pleas For Sanity as
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 87 Mr.... Pleas For Sanity as
- MaheshG: http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/12/03/opinion/03friedman.html ?permid=544#comment544 Here is a... Pleas For Sanity as








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content