Days of Rage

#22 kaalchakra: I am sure all chowkies are rich and famous (and I am flattered to be in the company of these celebrities)...but is Dalrymple's attached article fiction?

bjkumar:

Your observations are correct..and I notices that too.

When the referees start kicking the ball themselves this is what happens. Editors become interactors. wearing TWO hats & non-disclosure, in essence the numero uno bane of the EAST..& especially Pakistan. WILL NOT SHED THE UNIFORM!

The CHOWK staff is cutting, pasting, highlighting passages to promote their non-mulla & pro-nanga agenda [ I'll spare the Oons word here..they CONTROL!).

A lot of the stuff getting published here is a mishmash for the paradoxical & at-odds purpose of generating clicks & unflinching idOlism.

Like a marriage of a Marxist to an Adam Smithist hoping to bear a baby who would be Hilton Hippie..like Paris Hilton.

bjkumar #20: Asma Jehangir has a place of honor with all true Pakistanis - and that is why she was leading the Lawyers procession that Dalrymple reports on. We can give you one-slightly used general (along with his uniform) though - and throw in some some holy men and one oxford graduate as well for free!!

tahmed32, beej seems to have a collector's fetish. So he might love all that :)

Is this article is a work of fiction? Probably not. But it surely is the work of a fiction writer whose sight does not stretch beyond the lifestyles of rich and famous, and their present and past glories.

After a lull, HP seems to be in full flow. He has written a great piece on FP and a pertinent interact here. I too feel that this article is not far removed from Indian soap-operas. It is a good article that Hamid's aunties should memorize and throw around bits and pieces in Islamabad's cock-tail parties for bringing in the 'intellectual' effects. But that is evident to most FP interactors. I thought that HP's interact was pertinent because of the question posed to echo.

As far as I am concerned I find interactors like kaal, HP, echo, swarrier, zee etc. much beyond the ken of Dalrymple. In this context I find Echo's affinity to the Mughals (or is it their court) a bit perplexing. Echo, what is it that draws your respect to these authoritarian zombies? If this great guy Akbar was so illuminated why did he not ban sati? No Muslim monarch, I repeat ... no Muslim monarch opposed or tried to ban the evil practices of the caste system. Having a Muslim name did not differentiate them from those bas@$%^s who had Hindu names except in their choice of villages on whom they fancied genocide. Echo get a life ... or get out of your inherent fascination of what is 'white'. The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend.

(This is my last interact on this thread which follows a stupid Bollywoodish article).

GT:
I think a short answer would suffice.

Muslims, are strictly prohibited to interfere in the religious practices, rituals, cultures of those who are NOT muslims.

Once they convert they are supposed to adhere very strictly to the Islamic practice & culture & give up the pagan/non-muslim practices.

Fundamentalism ( GOOD word) is not applied one sidedly.


Babur , the great Mughal, specifically intructed MUSLIMS to be very discreet about cow slaughter. It is also in his will to Hamayoun his emperor son.

SATI:

This indeed is very disturbing but even then there was no interference EXCEPT on one occasion & one occasion ONLY.

and that was by Sher Shah Suri.

Once during his exile days he was given sanctuary by a hindu woman who had called mother because of some childhood memories [ I forget detail]. It so happened that when he was appointed the adminitrator of a certain district, some 20 years later, he was aghast to find out that it was that same woman who was to be sutteed , by her "will" of course..because that was what was expected of her..no choice then.

Sher Shah intefered & stopped it..but then the Pundits all went to the governor & complained. The Governor immedeiately reprimanded Sher Shah and told him that their in a social-contract that no rel;igion wiill interfere in another religion {sounds like pristine "secooolarism]. Sher Shah backed off but was determined to curb it whenever he would get a chance.

Whe he took control of Bihar, the first thing he did was to summon a large assembly of Pundits & brahmins & arranged a debate , without any coersion yet in control, to somehow work towards alternatives.

Sati was stopped then by the Pundits & Brahmins themselves agreeing that it was not necessary. You might call it his power & influence..but still it was not decreed & no one was punished if they did so. There IS a difference.

After him they all went back to their old ways. You might also be aware that sati gets more "honourable" either in famine or in plenty.

perhaps people are being too harsh on dalrymple--he is a superb writer and fair but he is, all said and done, still an orientalist with all that entails.

btw, i can understand why the hinduans are upset at mr. dalrymple glorifying the great Mughals--after all it is these Mughals who turned India from a god-forsaken place into the wonder of the world. but they were Muslims--gosh most of them were orthodox too (Akbar was the sole exception--and only in the latter part of his life. As the great Aurangzeb said: "Jadd e man, Akbar, akbar neest, akfar ast!" ) so I can see why it might get your goat but if it wasn't for these benign 'dictators' you wouldn't have a tourist industry!!!

Naqsh, there may well be something to that. But if Mr. Dailyrumple is to rise above Hindu-Muslim imbroglio, he has to first move out of the celebrity page. IF that is his ambition.

LOL, as I write this, Zee TV is showing Lallol Prasad Special of Sa Re Ga Ma. This promises to be fun. There are also two enormously talented Pakistani kids in it.

That's my type of Moghul. I am going to focus on watching that now. :)

(NYC, you should watch this episode as well. It seems really good.)

The Kanjaroons have finally been recognised & are being outed on the street.

Maader-RATES, Maader-RUNS & roshan-khayali-pulaaOs time is coming to an end

FULL report here:
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/tariq_ali/2007/08/sinking_together.ht ml
============================================================
The mood among sections of the street - I am currently in Lahore - is summed up in a cruel taunt: "People's Party de ballay, ballay / ade kanjar, ade dallay" (Marvel at the People Party / half-whore and half-pimp).

Re: # 9

impressive name dropping --HP! -- especially with that great word 'matherchod' -- what a clean jump over the Chowk's electronic fence c/s/ensors.....)

Lemme see if your word again scales over the Chowk moral sensors -- undetected.

lol....i just saw the lalloo prasad sa re gama, that guy is something special :) apparently he can hold a bull's horns and stand on its head ....why oh why are pakistani politicans not half as talented as him?
Lahori Mussarat kicks ass he is fantastic!!! so is Lucknow's Poonam!! ....i was really sad about harpreet and especially about the way he took it :( i posted his wonderful rendition of vaada tera vaada on UP.

31 Posted by Naqshbandi on September 1, 2007 3:06:35 pm but if it wasn't for these benign 'dictators' you wouldn't have a tourist industry!!!

Naqshbandi, Indian tourist industry is not about the Taj Mahal alone. You have the palaces and forts of Rajasthan, the beautifull temples of the South, the majestic beaches of Goa, Kerala to name a few. Udaivillas, a beautifull Rajastani palace turned hotel has come out as the best hotel of the world- 2007.

amansandhu,
i know india's tourist industry is vast and not jst about the taj--did i say that? but you have to admit that most people go to see the various Mughal built forts and palaces and gardens or those built in the Mughal-style by other petty and local kings and rulers. the exception is in south india i guess where the Mughal influence wasn 't as much as in the north.

-----------------

echo bhai, ba'd az salam arz hai ke aap ka post bilkal darust hai!

i love that slogan!

Naqsh, your knowledge of India is limited and is Mughal centric.
The forts and palaces of Rajasthan and other states are not copies of Mughal architecture most predate the Mughals. Most foreign tourists visit Rajasthan, Goa, Kerala, Himachal Pradesh where you hardly find any Mughal influence.

Qabl as aamad e pisr e Timur ra, Hind che bood?
Ba'd as raft e pisr-haa-ye Babar ra, Hind cheest?

:-)