Twin Blasts in Rawalpindi leaves 27 dead, 70 injured

#48 Posted by hamidm2,

Sure. That suits me fine as long as there are enough fresh and supple breeders of pimps moving in from Michigan.

This is the first step, inshallah you will see soon some mujahid mard e momin takeover over the nuc weapons and then a nuc suicide attack on the Kafirs. Shadat hi asl imaan hai.

So Zeemax is happy that these criminals would turn Islamabad in to Baghdad! That is sick!

It is just speculation right now but one thing seems clear that it was not a suicide bomber and that rules out the Pathan Criminals from the tribal areas.

If It was a timing device, it was planted when the buses were parked with in the cantonment areas so it maybe an inside job.

Lastly and that is a strong possibility; with the amount of sophistication in picking the targets and the planning behind it, perhaps it is RAW responding to the Hyderabad blasts that the Indians blamed on ISI.

Strangely, in Hyderabad there were two bombs and in Pindi the response was exactly two bombs. Some Islamic outfits in Pakistan are perhaps infiltrated!

May this marde e momin come from within the army, or may the army assist him, isse Pak fauj ke gunah dhul jayenge aur murtid o munafiq ke daagh se bach jayenge

#51 Posted by HP

You guys are all idiots. Can't you see I've been saying again and again that this was the inevitable and well foreseen consequence of the heavy handedness displayed in the Jamia Hafsa op? Now that it's come true, you think it is sick? How much do you know about the Hafsa and the TNSM/ Waziristan / Bajaur / Swat connection?

But never mind, your analytical capabilities became quite clear when you termed CJ a corrupt judge and the reference against him well-founded - and were reinforced when you further reaffirmed you still hold that view :)

Zeemax sahib,

(You mean like they should take out a bunch of burqa clad rebellious school girls with white phosphorous.)

I don't remember ever having said that killing a bunch of burqa clad girls with white phosphorus (whatever that stuff is) was great thing to do.

It is sad that thinking people shud applaud innocent people dying irrespective of their affiliations.

HP sain,

No point in blaming Injuns (whether it is the bunch of idiots called RAW or the maha idiot Hindu racist, casteist, bigoted, misogynist freak) for your own homegrown tumour.

Regards

heya zee, please cease and dissist from your savage acts of violence, especially against blameless oysters and lemons... is there not enough misery in the world :(

#55 Posted by cliftonbridge,

LoL ... Hiya ..

BTW raw Oysters with Neembus nichoRed on top are heavenly ... and the aftermath is even heavenlier (thumbs up)!!!

#54 Posted by majumdar

Arrey Bhai .... watch my lips:

PEOPLE DIE IN WARS ... SO DON'T PICK ONE !

Zeemax sahib

(PEOPLE DIE IN WARS ... SO DON'T PICK ONE ! )

I believe in the dictum, make luv not war. But if I have to pick a war I wud pick the one that is going on now- Muslimooooooooons against the Kanjarooooooons in Pak. At least we kaffiroooooooons from across the border will be safe till u guys have acocunted for each other.

Regards

#54 Posted by majumdar
"For your own homegrown tumor."

Homegrown tumor does snot work in isolation. Per Indians the Indians groups are connected to the ISI. so, possibly some Islamic groups in Pakistan are connected to RAW too. That is something that can never be overlooked. The more I look at it, the more it appears to be a handy work of professionals.

There are many groups in Pakistan that can do it but mostly likely RAW is behind it. Responding to the Hyderabad blasts.

#53 Posted by zeemax
"Can't you see I've been saying again and again that this was the inevitable and well foreseen consequence of the heavy handedness displayed in the Jamia Hafsa op?"

Turning Isloo in to Baghdad is different than responding to the army. You are completely sick if you don't understand what is happening in Baghdad. These Mullahs are criminals for even syaing something like that. The mullah in Jamia Hafasa were involved in criminal activities and the army gave them six months to shape up. You think criminals are allowed to rule the country because they are promising to turn Islamabad in to Baghdad?

You are sick!

HP sain,

There may be a point in what u r saying. But somehow good Muslimooooons working hands in gluvs with Hanuds just somehow does not ring true. If I am not mistaken even the GoP hasn't blamed the RAW till now.

Besides RAW is a bunch of idiots and good for nothing except predicting election results which they get wrong anyways.

Regards

#59 Posted by HP,

Okay let's walk through this argument:

"The mullah in Jamia Hafasa were involved in criminal activities."

Which criminal activity were they involved in for starters? Vigilantism against illegal sexual material and prostitution? Is that a criminal activity?

People routinely beat up and lock up thieves when found in their neighbourhoods. They did nothing more than that.

Occupation of the library? No more than a protest sit-in.

Demands to rebuild the mosques? Implementation of the Sharia as guaranteed in the constitution? That's criminal?

Storing arms? Sure they saved them all so they wouldn't get the shine off the rocket launchers for the photo sessions later, and held off the commandos for ten days with exactly 14 Kalashnikovs.

You're a tiny moron. Not even a hefty one :)

#60 Posted by majumdar

“But somehow good Muslimooooons working hands in gluvs with Hanuds just somehow does not ring true.”

There tons on good Muslims who work with Hindus in India and Pakistan both. That is just a ridiculous argument. Indian history is replete with such cooperation. Are you denying the history? Second, RAW is an Indian agency or are you suggesting that it is a Hindu agency?

Zeemax,
You are just trivializing the issue. Go back to some archives and see what those MCs were saying and doing. Taking control of the government property for six months is enough cause for the government to take actions. These guys were showing guns and beating up people.

Who killed the army officers and Jawans, if there were no arms in the Lal Mosque?

#62 Posted by HP,

Who killed the army officers and Jawans, if there were no arms in the Lal Mosque?

Read #61. They had 14 sniper-positioned Kalashnikovs with which they held off the commandos for ten days. Ghazi admitted that several times on live television.

Also watch the photo on my profile. The two guys you see are from Waziristan who brought their AKs with them.

Re: # 62

hp,

.... i think you are missing zeemax's point ... he is saying that the denizens of lal masjid were simply asking for the implementation of the sharia as called for by the constitution ..... the government, according to zeemax, is infidel and illegal and therfore the citizens of the islamic republic are duty bound to take up arms against it ......... he does have a point .... it seems that the muslimoons have drawn a line in the sand and are ready for a bloody battle with the kanjaroons ..........