Yasser Latif Hamdani September 5, 2007
#45 Posted by majumdar on September 7, 2007 12:09:52 am
HP sain/Manto mian,
Re: FM Controversy
Doesn't the Chowk have a FM- Romair sahib? Why not ask him for adjudication on the FM debate.
Masadi sahib,
If MAJ's popularity arises out of his appeal to Muslim separatism how come 46% of Injuns have given him a thumbs up, Muslims are only 15% of the population.
Regards
Re: FM Controversy
Doesn't the Chowk have a FM- Romair sahib? Why not ask him for adjudication on the FM debate.
Masadi sahib,
If MAJ's popularity arises out of his appeal to Muslim separatism how come 46% of Injuns have given him a thumbs up, Muslims are only 15% of the population.
Regards
#44 Posted by thinkingstorm on September 7, 2007 12:08:41 am
Please correct me if I am wrong harish, but wasn't manto an admirer of gandhi too a long way back?
with much respect,
thinking storm
with much respect,
thinking storm
#43 Posted by masadi on September 7, 2007 12:08:23 am
Hey manto, read #39 before getting all screwy minded, you have lost the arguments regardless of your he said she said that a secret meeting revealed bribery evidence. The Church of the MAJ has been routed on Chowk
#42 Posted by harish_hyd on September 7, 2007 12:07:47 am
Folks, in all this tu-tu main-main, one glaring fact seems to have been completely overlooked. Not so long ago, Yasser was an unabashed admirer, nay worshipper of Bhutto. Alas, poor ZAB is no longer in his good books and has been relegated to the dustbins of Yasser's study where MKG lies in his permanent resting place.
#41 Posted by masadi on September 7, 2007 12:06:58 am
In #39 read "Now why would you suppor the previous kind of mass support and not the latter is what is baffling to me, seriously "
As "Now why would you support the previous kind of mass support and not the latter is what is baffling to me, seriously "
This part was for HP.
As "Now why would you support the previous kind of mass support and not the latter is what is baffling to me, seriously "
This part was for HP.
#40 Posted by MantoLives on September 7, 2007 12:05:57 am
Masadi,
You are tying yourself up in knots. You say Jinnah was not popular and yet FJ was a candidate because of him. You still haven't answered why FJ was so popular all over Pakistan... as HP has mentioned below.
You are tying yourself up in knots. You say Jinnah was not popular and yet FJ was a candidate because of him. You still haven't answered why FJ was so popular all over Pakistan... as HP has mentioned below.
#39 Posted by masadi on September 7, 2007 12:05:46 am
Seperation from the Hindus, and invoking religious sentiment in that seperation and the resulting dynamic of seperation was what popularized MAJ in Pakistan through an entire cultural enterprise. What popularized ZAB were real bread and butter economic concerns of the people, not theology and seperation. Now why would you suppor the previous kind of mass support and not the latter is what is baffling to me, seriously
#38 Posted by MantoLives on September 7, 2007 12:04:18 am
HP,
"Ms. Jinnah had overwhelming support in every city and town in Pakistan. The reason she was supported was MAJ. She was nobody without him.
Now you can debate all you want but the fact remains that MAJ is still popular in at least Karachi and Punjab. "
Well said.
Infact the greatest support Fatima Jinnah had was in East Pakistan ... even Jinnah's role in the Urdu as lingua franca was not enough to undo his popularity there.
Fatima Jinnah brought East and West together albeit briefly. This is what I feel was the greatest loss.
"Ms. Jinnah had overwhelming support in every city and town in Pakistan. The reason she was supported was MAJ. She was nobody without him.
Now you can debate all you want but the fact remains that MAJ is still popular in at least Karachi and Punjab. "
Well said.
Infact the greatest support Fatima Jinnah had was in East Pakistan ... even Jinnah's role in the Urdu as lingua franca was not enough to undo his popularity there.
Fatima Jinnah brought East and West together albeit briefly. This is what I feel was the greatest loss.
#37 Posted by masadi on September 7, 2007 12:01:38 am
HP writes "what are you talking about? Ms. Jinnah had overwhelming support in every city and town in Pakistan. The reason she was supported was MAJ. She was nobody without him."
My point and I stand by it is that she was propped up by the alliance because of the MAJ factor- nobody disputes this, the support like you say she had was because of the cultural factor of MAJ and not because of any message she had or he had for that matter for the people, other than legitimizing their massacre. The other fact that is also there is that she lost, while ZAB won and had popular support because of a message that was "original support" and not anything built upon cultural legitimation of the MAJ kind...
My point and I stand by it is that she was propped up by the alliance because of the MAJ factor- nobody disputes this, the support like you say she had was because of the cultural factor of MAJ and not because of any message she had or he had for that matter for the people, other than legitimizing their massacre. The other fact that is also there is that she lost, while ZAB won and had popular support because of a message that was "original support" and not anything built upon cultural legitimation of the MAJ kind...
#36 Posted by HP on September 6, 2007 11:52:02 pm
In East Pakistan she was the darling of the crowds though her speeches were in broken urdu. Still, Bengalis flocked to her public meetings.
#35 Posted by MantoLives on September 6, 2007 11:51:41 pm
About popular support... it is suffice to see the facts...
Forget that Fatima Jinnah was the unanimous choice of a divided polity... forget that those who sided with Fatima Jinnah included people who had opposed Jinnah...
Since 1939... Jinnah came to be known as Quaid-e-Azam- after he was referred to as by a Muslim writer from UP and later even Gandhi called him Quaid-e-Azam... though Jinnah never referred to himself as that.
Meanwhile just like Ayub became a field marshal ... Zulfikar Ali Bhutto annointed himself Quaid-e-Awam... yet not even all of his supporters call him that.
Forget that Fatima Jinnah was the unanimous choice of a divided polity... forget that those who sided with Fatima Jinnah included people who had opposed Jinnah...
Since 1939... Jinnah came to be known as Quaid-e-Azam- after he was referred to as by a Muslim writer from UP and later even Gandhi called him Quaid-e-Azam... though Jinnah never referred to himself as that.
Meanwhile just like Ayub became a field marshal ... Zulfikar Ali Bhutto annointed himself Quaid-e-Awam... yet not even all of his supporters call him that.
#34 Posted by HP on September 6, 2007 11:49:14 pm
Asadi
"The fact: Fatima Jinnah lost, Fatima Jinnah was propped up becaue of the MAJ factor (monarchial succession) erroneously thinking that the people would support her because of the MAJ cultural domination of the West Pakistan scene. They were wrong MAJ had no popular support,"
what are you talking about? Ms. Jinnah had overwhelming support in every city and town in Pakistan. The reason she was supported was MAJ. She was nobody without him.
Now you can debate all you want but the fact remains that MAJ is still popular in at least Karachi and Punjab.
"The fact: Fatima Jinnah lost, Fatima Jinnah was propped up becaue of the MAJ factor (monarchial succession) erroneously thinking that the people would support her because of the MAJ cultural domination of the West Pakistan scene. They were wrong MAJ had no popular support,"
what are you talking about? Ms. Jinnah had overwhelming support in every city and town in Pakistan. The reason she was supported was MAJ. She was nobody without him.
Now you can debate all you want but the fact remains that MAJ is still popular in at least Karachi and Punjab.
#33 Posted by thinkingstorm on September 6, 2007 11:48:16 pm
manto pappu,
I am not masadi. I am sitting in California right now, getting disgusted by your ramblings.
Please argue with me on seperate posts.
And get that gavel out of your ass and present yourself to the CJ for ass duty pronto!
with much respect,
thinking storm
I am not masadi. I am sitting in California right now, getting disgusted by your ramblings.
Please argue with me on seperate posts.
And get that gavel out of your ass and present yourself to the CJ for ass duty pronto!
with much respect,
thinking storm
#32 Posted by MantoLives on September 6, 2007 11:45:35 pm
HP,
Was Ayub Khan was a perfectly legitimate civilian president from 1962-1969? That Ayub was not in uniform during this period? Could we say then that military rule ended in 1962?
To my mind a Field Marshal is a serving officer but I am willing to be convinced otherwise.
Masadi/thinkingstorm,
You think you can win any arguments with this kind of abuse? One can imagine why you were fired from that American community college and why you were thrown out of a Pakisatni college ...
Was Ayub Khan was a perfectly legitimate civilian president from 1962-1969? That Ayub was not in uniform during this period? Could we say then that military rule ended in 1962?
To my mind a Field Marshal is a serving officer but I am willing to be convinced otherwise.
Masadi/thinkingstorm,
You think you can win any arguments with this kind of abuse? One can imagine why you were fired from that American community college and why you were thrown out of a Pakisatni college ...
#31 Posted by masadi on September 6, 2007 11:43:46 pm
Manto writes "Herbert Feldman recounted in his book “Crisis to Crisis” that a certain Shaikh Karamatullah of Tasnim-e-Islami quoted Mahmoodul Haq Usmani, the General Secretary of Wali Khan’s NAP that a handsome amount was paid to Maulana Bhashani and his party by Ayub government through Zulfikar Ali Bhutto to ensure Fatima Jinnah’s defeat"
Now if an ordinary Bob presented this kind of evidence, we'd say he was just naive to accept it but when a lawyer does it we know he wants mere deception. A certain x quoted y, that political opponents said that they were bribed to ensure the defeat of Fatima Jinnah. Even a bloody fool can see this this is slander against ZAB and nothing else. The fact: Fatima Jinnah lost, Fatima Jinnah was propped up becaue of the MAJ factor (monarchial succession) erroneously thinking that the people would support her because of the MAJ cultural domination of the West Pakistan scene. They were wrong MAJ had no popular support, the first time anyone broke through to the hearts of the public of Pakistan was when ZAB went to the people with his socialist agenda. Let the dogs bark, the books have already been written and no x quoted y that he heard z say that the prophet said such and so- the classic hadith deception will ever change the facts of history...
Now if an ordinary Bob presented this kind of evidence, we'd say he was just naive to accept it but when a lawyer does it we know he wants mere deception. A certain x quoted y, that political opponents said that they were bribed to ensure the defeat of Fatima Jinnah. Even a bloody fool can see this this is slander against ZAB and nothing else. The fact: Fatima Jinnah lost, Fatima Jinnah was propped up becaue of the MAJ factor (monarchial succession) erroneously thinking that the people would support her because of the MAJ cultural domination of the West Pakistan scene. They were wrong MAJ had no popular support, the first time anyone broke through to the hearts of the public of Pakistan was when ZAB went to the people with his socialist agenda. Let the dogs bark, the books have already been written and no x quoted y that he heard z say that the prophet said such and so- the classic hadith deception will ever change the facts of history...
#30 Posted by thinkingstorm on September 6, 2007 11:36:41 pm
Manto,
Please check UP. I have opened a thread in your honor.
with much respect,
thinking storm
Please check UP. I have opened a thread in your honor.
with much respect,
thinking storm
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- quin: I don't know why... Translation of a (Love)
- Naqshbandi: I wrote 'love' in... Translation of a (Love)
- Naqshbandi: Tahir, I apologise for calling... Translation of a (Love)
- chaltahai: masadi, how would you... Translation of a (Love)
- mullah_toofani: Masadi baitay, You seem like... Translation of a (Love)
- masadi: g'night... Translation of a (Love)
- masadi: In #22 "facing" not... Translation of a (Love)
- masadi: Give a free reign... Translation of a (Love)








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content