Dost Mittar September 18, 2007
#33 Posted by hamidm2 on September 21, 2007 5:44:35 am
Re: # 32
i am sorry ... i meant women who refuse to show their ugly mugs and wear the niqab should be waterboarded ..... i am so mad, i can't think straight !....... dinesh d'souza, help me !
......... i have work to do, but i will be back to beat some sense into these primitive savages ........ damn natives !
i am sorry ... i meant women who refuse to show their ugly mugs and wear the niqab should be waterboarded ..... i am so mad, i can't think straight !....... dinesh d'souza, help me !
......... i have work to do, but i will be back to beat some sense into these primitive savages ........ damn natives !
#34 Posted by tahmed32 on September 21, 2007 5:47:08 am
hamidm #33: may the blessings of the season be on you. Aaameen.
I protest your claim that Jullunder has mud huts. Our ancestral home not far from Jullunder stood strong and proud for 40 years after my people had to...er...depart with some haste. And even today a part of the original wall still stands.
I protest your claim that Jullunder has mud huts. Our ancestral home not far from Jullunder stood strong and proud for 40 years after my people had to...er...depart with some haste. And even today a part of the original wall still stands.
#35 Posted by hamidm2 on September 21, 2007 5:47:58 am
.... and guys, with winter coming up, please buy your moms some real shoes - it is sad to see elderely women with rings on their toes walking around in the snow wearing big-toe-in-strap chappals ....... heck with your culture - the poor woman will get frostbite !
#36 Posted by VRV on September 21, 2007 5:49:57 am
Hamid,
... if you want to live like primitive savages go back to your mud hut in jullunder or gujranwala or whatever godforsaken place on the dark continent you came from .....
Btw, what happened to ur Blue Label whiskey, buddy?
U know I read ur posts for humour though u are inconsistent, self-contradcitory though a potent msg giver (no Muhammed, though).
... if you want to live like primitive savages go back to your mud hut in jullunder or gujranwala or whatever godforsaken place on the dark continent you came from .....
Btw, what happened to ur Blue Label whiskey, buddy?
U know I read ur posts for humour though u are inconsistent, self-contradcitory though a potent msg giver (no Muhammed, though).
#37 Posted by tahmed32 on September 21, 2007 5:51:45 am
vrv #36 it appears my protest against the defaming of julluder as having mud huts in #34 has fallen on deaf ears. :-(
#38 Posted by hamidm2 on September 21, 2007 5:54:53 am
tahmed,
.... oh yea, i have heard about the jullunder philharmonic orchestra and seen pictures of the opera house ! ......... get real !
..... i still remember the first time i went to my ancestral village i had to squat in the fields to relieve myself ...... the wheat, or what passes for wheat in the potohar, had just been harvested and the darn stalks were sticking six inches above the ground so that i had to stick my ass up in the air ......what a sight i must have made !...... to this day i cannot eat bread without choking .........
...... i will take the white man's indoor plumbing any day - there is no honor in exposing your butt to the elements (unless you are a voyeur like masadi)
#39 Posted by tahmed32 on September 21, 2007 5:57:23 am
hamidm #38 Yes indeed. Crapper (inventor of the indoor flush) Zindabad!!
#40 Posted by tahmed32 on September 21, 2007 6:00:27 am
hamidm: i think the word you meant for masadi was "exhibitionist", not "voyeur". Now I have to start teaching english to you fob immigrants as well!!
#41 Posted by hamidm2 on September 21, 2007 6:03:09 am
Re: # 36
vrv,
.... what is up with desis and scotch ? .... we should be drinking our own tharra and dying like those people in karachi ..... after all, scotch is not part of our culture - we should be smoking charas and drinking bhang and country hooch at the mazars of our great sufis .........
p.s. i am not much of a scotch person even though i will have a glass of unblended stuff as an after dinner drink ......
vrv,
.... what is up with desis and scotch ? .... we should be drinking our own tharra and dying like those people in karachi ..... after all, scotch is not part of our culture - we should be smoking charas and drinking bhang and country hooch at the mazars of our great sufis .........
p.s. i am not much of a scotch person even though i will have a glass of unblended stuff as an after dinner drink ......
#42 Posted by hamidm2 on September 21, 2007 6:04:41 am
Re: # 40
masadi is an exhibitionist cum voyeur ....... the railroad tracks were made for both ....... long live the british !
masadi is an exhibitionist cum voyeur ....... the railroad tracks were made for both ....... long live the british !
#43 Posted by tahmed32 on September 21, 2007 6:08:46 am
#41 i agree with you on this desi-scotch connection. At U of Mich business school, when asked to bring examples of what we thought was effective advertizing, the three Indian students all brought along one of those faux-sophisticated whiskey ads in magazines. Everyone else agreed they skipped over such ads without a second glance. :-)
#44 Posted by dost_mittar on September 21, 2007 6:16:11 am
kaal#15:
"Multiculturalism is a dead and useless doctrine."
Multiculturalism is the inevitable outcome of the shrinking world and massive movements of people across the globe not only as immigrants and refugees but also as travellers. It is a beautiful bouquet, but the need is to ensure that it does not become a clutter of weeds. For that, what is needed are strict Lakshman Rekhas.
"Multiculturalism is a dead and useless doctrine."
Multiculturalism is the inevitable outcome of the shrinking world and massive movements of people across the globe not only as immigrants and refugees but also as travellers. It is a beautiful bouquet, but the need is to ensure that it does not become a clutter of weeds. For that, what is needed are strict Lakshman Rekhas.
#45 Posted by dost_mittar on September 21, 2007 6:23:44 am
nasah#18:
"as I have said before I will say it again -- do in Rome as Romans do"
Always a good advice. But in the last part of the last century, the "Romans" themselves said that newcomers to Rome do not need to change; they could go to Jamuna and remain Ganga Ram. And the newcomers did! The problem was that the newcomers were never told that they need to leave their excess baggage behind when they came to their new homes. So, they brought their prejudices, their hatreds and their concepts of "honour" and "aurat ki auqaat" with them. And this is where the problem started.
"as I have said before I will say it again -- do in Rome as Romans do"
Always a good advice. But in the last part of the last century, the "Romans" themselves said that newcomers to Rome do not need to change; they could go to Jamuna and remain Ganga Ram. And the newcomers did! The problem was that the newcomers were never told that they need to leave their excess baggage behind when they came to their new homes. So, they brought their prejudices, their hatreds and their concepts of "honour" and "aurat ki auqaat" with them. And this is where the problem started.
#46 Posted by dost_mittar on September 21, 2007 6:32:41 am
echoboom#19:
"Multi-culturalism is Multi-kanjarRism
& Melting-potism is Multi-Pottyism."
I am not sure where you stand. Are you saying that multiculturalism as it is practised is a sham (which it is to some extent), or do you want Canada to go back to the pre-sixties?
I agree with you that we come from a culture where multiculturalism had evolved in a natural, organic way and was part of the fabric of the society.
"Multi-culturalism is Multi-kanjarRism
& Melting-potism is Multi-Pottyism."
I am not sure where you stand. Are you saying that multiculturalism as it is practised is a sham (which it is to some extent), or do you want Canada to go back to the pre-sixties?
I agree with you that we come from a culture where multiculturalism had evolved in a natural, organic way and was part of the fabric of the society.
#47 Posted by KaalChakra on September 21, 2007 6:46:50 am
dm sahib
Lakshaman Rekha does not work against the golden dear.
It is a useles and dead doctrine. Time to dump it, and think completely anew.
Lakshaman Rekha does not work against the golden dear.
It is a useles and dead doctrine. Time to dump it, and think completely anew.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- nb: And back to NFP's... The Correct Turn
- nb: I didn't know that,... The Correct Turn
- akcheema: Re: # 182; nb thanks... The Correct Turn
- nb: Cheema, hing is asafoetida... The Correct Turn
- akcheema: Re: # 180 yaar nb... The Correct Turn
- nb: HP, if it was... The Correct Turn
- akcheema: dost_mittar and hamidm sahibaan,... The Correct Turn
- ahmedmadani: When we who write... Politics of PPP and








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content