Will President Bush Invade Iran?

#66 Posted by tahmed32

zeemax: i thought buxom was an adjective, not a noun.

tahmed32, grammar is the least of my concerns when confronted with matters 'buxom'.

Borivilli mian,

(Now first you partitioned the country)

If I am not mistaken it was MAJ (pbuh) and AIML which called for Partition of India.

(then you played a double game in kashmir while another in hyderabad and junagad)

This double game incidentally was started by MAJ (pbuh). Indians were more than happy to give up Kashmir to Pak if they would give up Hyd and Junagadh but MAJ wanted both and got none. I know you will not believe me but you can check up on articles in The Hindu by Mr. AG Noorani, a Momin and a big time MAJ fan (almost as big time fan of MAJ as YLH or myself).

http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1712/17120730.htm

http://www.hi nduonnet.com/fline/fl1805/18050750.htm

http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1924 /stories/20021206001107400.htm

(then you schemed in East pakistan)

I dont get it. Mujib won a majority in Pak, your great general Yahya and ZAB responded by starting a genocide there and we did the scheming.

Regards

Borivilli mian,

(Beyghairaton abh bhi kuch sharam karo abh bhi waqt hai)

Sharm for what: Spryaing our school kids with WP or for strafing villagers with helicopter gunships.

(u did what shakuni of the mahabharata would be proud of)

It may interest you that Shakuni came from Gandhara, which is bascially parts of West Punjab and NWFP. One of Shakuni's kids may have been your grandpa Gopinath.

(only communists have any honor )

Commies of course do not believe in the existence of Allah.

Again, Zeemax sahib take note this gentleman is attributing honour to Godless people.

Regards

The part given to the chinese was useful for them and utterly useles and inaccesible for pakistan and most importantly of all it was vital for pakistan's survival against a much larger and hostile bully, understand?

harish arguing with u is pointless zia in the afghan jihad was betraying no friends get it or not? very diff from India's betrayel of iran, nor was he betraying long held and loudly proclaimed beliefs. Comprendi??? ditto for Kashmiris.

Now first you partitioned the country, then you played a double game in kashmir while another in hyderabad and junagad, then you schemed in East pakistan and now you will make your little profit while a brave and small country is bombed for the same principles you loudly proclaimed.

you have already btrayed it twice while it stood by you in the UN for decades atleast dont make your commision on the side you nation of banias and bribetakers

And for all your so called concern for the Kashmiris, how come you gave away a part of it to the Chinese without so much as batting an eyelid?

#118 by borivili_express

pakistan didnt do it only for the crumbs...

Umm..OK, Borivili yaar, you mean it is OK to betray friends if you're faced with an existential threat? Nice convenient argument you chose for yourself.

Bhai, Pakistan has been doing it for the crumbs right from the very beginning. If you chronicle Pakistan's alliances, almost everyone of them has been for the moolah and Pakis don't even pretend it is otherwise. Do you remember Zia-ul-Haq's famous complaint that the aid the US offered was peanuts?

#119 by borivili_express

Even in the case of JKLf it was a change in pakistani perception not a case of we will sell our bodies and souls for a litle silver not even gold.

Again, nice excuse but won't wash. For all the tears you shed for Kashmiris, you were pretty quick when it came to dumping the JKLF without a second thought, weren't you?

Zeemax sahib,

Kindly note that Borivilli mian writes in # 118 "The mominas were into illegal occupation and dictat enforcement along with their buddies."

Please bring this to the notice of Messrs Mehsud and Fazlu and make sure that proper Islamic justice is served to this gentleman when they establish Nizam-e-Mustafa in Pakistan.

Regards

Beyghairaton abh bhi kuch sharam karo abh bhi waqt hai

Even in the case of JKLf it was a change in pakistani perception not a case of we will sell our bodies and souls for a litle silver not even gold.

U betrayed a sovereign country an old friend and went against what you had been screaming for 60 years as principles which u justified for your own pursuit of nukes. That is why I say Nehru, Indira and the rest of you hindus are such wily scheemers only communists have any honor

The mominas were into illegal occupation and dictat enforcement along with their buddies.

As regards the Taliban and pakistan then Pakistan was faced with the question of a with us or agaisnt us choice, pakistan didnt do it only for the crumbs very different from India's case where there was no existential threat, u did what shakuni of the mahabharata would be proud of

#116 by majumdar

And I'm sure the JKLF - the once much pampered Kashmiri terrorist outfit - must have felt the same way when Pakistan discovered much to its horror that it advocated independence instead of merger with Pakistan.

Borivilli mian,

(I am sure the Iranians must have thought "Et Tu Brutus" after half a century of friendship and telling the world that posesing nuclear weapons was the soveriegn right of a nation they stabbed Iran in the full senate not once but twice what glorious bastards )

And what were the Mominas thinking when they were being sprayed with White Phosphorus?

Regards

Sorry #114 is in response to #111 and not #112.

#112 by borivili_express

The Mahabharat teaches hindus treachery and backstabbing for a few crumbs from the US they proved themselves and hypocrites and even back stabbed their old friends.

And which scripture (I hope it's not the Koran) of yours teach you to abandon your bosom buddies the Taliban after just one phone call from Colin Powell?

I am sure the Iranians must have thought "Et Tu Brutus" after half a century of friendship and telling the world that posesing nuclear weapons was the soveriegn right of a nation they stabbed Iran in the full senate not once but twice what glorious bastards