The Sudanese Teddy Bear Saga

HP #92 {"Salim,
After a long time I have seen a better post from you...look at Loop's post # 81 and read this.

“and for the non-muslim boy who owns a teddy (??) get help and if i ever see you I will surely not wait for a court ruling but kill you on the spot!!”"}

HP Sain,
What is even more incredulous is that these people really mean what they say. I always thought that they were merely trying to get attention by acting stupid and talking silly. But then, I never took Hamidumdum Sahib seriously either ...:)

#96 masanamuthu {"Moreover, it is an insult for the teddy bears to be named after this violent megalomaniac. "}

Mithu Bhai,
Perhaps if you read more about this Humble and Kind Person (PBUH), rather than judge him from the violence and irrational cruelty of those who ostensibly commit evil in his name, you may find it in your heart to like BOTH the Teddy Bear and the Holy Prophet (PBUH)

Salim,

Unfortunately I came to that conclusion after reading more about your prophet. Do you deny that when islamists ask for punishments for defaming the prophet they are not basing that on islamic laws as approved by the prophet?

Anyways, I do take offence in naming a teddy bear after him. It is a disgrace to the teddy bear.

Sherbaz sahib,

(graffitti in singapore can get you flogged and having anal sex in alabama can get you 6 months in prison. Needless to say, if I'm in singapore, I wont be tagging any walls and if I'm in Alabama.... )

Lemme try to complete the quote for you

"My partner (male or female) and I would be doing b*****y only in private and keep it secret from authorities"

Did I get it right???

Regards

#90 Posted by zeemax on December 8, 2007 10:36:49 pm

I have news for islamofascists like you who live in the west..in the west, i can call my dog mohammad and there's nothing the 1.2 offended billion muslims can do about it.

get over it..

Re: # 101
dear arjun even if the 1.2 million cant do anything about it.. we believe in a god that will surely do something about you sooner or later. there is no escaping that!
and anyways, i urge muslims not to publish such things on the net and make debate about it because what you end up doing is getting more isults hurled at the Propher (PBUH) and islam by non-muslims who are shit scared by us because we will go to any lenghts to fight for our religion while they are so wrapped in this world that they will probably stop going to their temples all together if there was a bomb threat! and thats what they call their "faith"

arjun, don't be so sure. It is only a matter of time and a few more numbers. And numbers have a curious habit of changing in favor of Islam.

It's a group thing, nothing related to individuals. :)

#102 Posted by LOOP on December 9, 2007 8:58:17 pm


non-muslims who are shit scared by us because we will go to any lenghts to fight for our religion


scared? haha..another paki wannabe-tough-guy islamic warrior on the net...

tell you what, I'll insult mo and give you a place where you and I can meet to see what lenghts you're willing to go to fight for your religion...

An editorial in today’s NYTimes discusses how al-Bashir is creating so many hindrances in finding a peace solution for Darfurian genocide (creating obstacles in allowing a joint AU and UN peacekeeping force) while the state sponsored atrocities and genocide go on. He is perhaps following the true Sunnah worrying about a teddy bear and a dude who died 1500 years ago, and gives an f about the massacre of innocent people. If that’s what Islam teaches, then a cuddly teddy does not deserve to be named after any Muslim, dead or alive.

masanamuthu #99 {"Do you deny that when islamists ask for punishments for defaming the prophet they are not basing that on islamic laws as approved by the prophet?"}

Mithu Mian,
YES! Emphatically yes. The Holy Prophet (PBUH) never approved the Islamic laws (Shariah) that were codified approximately 150-200 years after he passsed away.

#101 arjun {" have news for islamofascists like you who live in the west..in the west, i can call my dog mohammad and there's nothing the 1.2 offended billion muslims can do about it. "}

Arjun,
If you really wanted to do that you could and would have done that already without blowing on your trumpet. Please ask yourself if renaming Fido as Muhammad (Nauzbillah) is what you really wanted to do, or was it your pleasure at announcing to the world, especially Muslims, that you had the balls to do so? If your rationale was because you wanted to do so, you are lying. If your rationale was that you were looking to piss off and hurt fellow humans, you are a very mean person, albeit an honest one. May Allah give you something better to do than naming dogs after spiritual leaders. Amen.

Re: # 78
You are so perniciously personal and bad-mouthed as though I have 'honourd' your sister or daughter like you believe MM was on another board.

Re:108, Shah Ji, I am hopeful that you will honor my daughter as you honor your own, now go and be a good old joker that you come accross as.

Mithu Mian,
YES! Emphatically yes. The Holy Prophet (PBUH) never approved the Islamic laws (Shariah) that were codified approximately 150-200 years after he passsed away.


Does that mean you are a Quran only Muslim??. Quran contains a lot of violent stuff to justify the title of the "violent megalomaniac" to your prophet. Teddy bears deserve better than that.

#110 masanamuthu {"??. Quran contains a lot of violent stuff to justify the title of the "violent megalomaniac" to your prophet."}

Mithu Mian,
You are now trying to categorize people in neat little pigeon holes so that you can get them on the defensive by quoting one verse or another out of context.

From what I have learned, the Holy Koran doesn't exalt the Holy Prophet (PBUH) in any regard other than that of a messenger, an divine errand, a peon of God - something he performed at great risk and loss of material wealth and stature for himself, his family, and his followers.

#111 *errand boy