The Conspiracy Theory

The world is indeed interconnected, however not controlled by a single intelligence, but rather a number of motives, which are profit and unjust enrichment and the furtherance of White and Zionist hegemony to the end of creating and maintaining a set of beneficiaries. This is the basis of the conspiracy. This is the inception and end of all things on the face of this planet. This is the basis of individualism, post-modernism, democracy, free trade, pluralism and many others amongst that compendium of delights which are truths a priori, so much so that they can justify genocide.

A spade nevertheless remains a spade. A "mindset" which appreciates this reality for all the agitprop, fictions and falsehoods designed to obstruficate and indeed deny reality, to the ends of promoting the interests of the beneficiaries of humanity, is by all means far superior to the alternative wisdom of sell-outs, traitors, lackeys and stooges who in all probability are driven exclusively by a deep and reinforced conviction in their own inferiority. The "nostalgic water-tight state" may not be probable under the given circumstances, but this by no means makes it undesirable. The ubiquity of a plague does create a moral duty to infect your children.

Re: # 194 HP a stupid and self centred man like u should learn to keep his tramp shut.

giani ji, a. h. amin is the definition of exception among us.

Dear Pavo,

I have to admit that I came across one of your articles by accident and then googled you and read whatever you the published - all that I could find on the web.

You confirm the long held suspicion of mine that under the skin we are all the same. Religion is personal and is best left at home.

I am not going to go into the merits of whether MAJ or MG or JLN were good or bad; or INC or ML were good or bad. They were a product of their times and they did what they geninuely believed to be right. One point is clear that they were giants in their own right to be able to manipulate so many people.

But one thing is for sure that IMs still suffer the consequences of 1947 - a fact both unfair and unjust.

I really enjoyed reading your articles and wish that you keep writing them.

Giani

Anilji,

The Brits were so badly hammered by the white Aryan Mahatma and his bunch of satyagrahis that independence would have happened even if the Injuns had gone down on all fours begging for Brits to stay back. QIM was irrelevant.

Sadna ji,

Re #248

You are right. But it is just not QIM but the entire progression of the so-called freedom struggle. INC ever since its formation had poilticised the Injun (at least the Hanud)middle classes and MKG politicised the masses as well which in the long run stood India in good stead. But specifically QIM was uncalled for and unwise.

MAJ (pbuh) in my opinion made a big mistake by not going to the masses in a big way until it was too late. And Pakistan is still paying the price. AIML remained largely a party of feudal toadies in the areas which were ultimately to form Pakistan. Although in the minority provinces it developed support among the salariat class as well.

Regards

Jinnah cooperated with the British, the INC didn't. Jinnah got Pakistan, India got freedom from the British and the Western strategic interests' local collaborators. Today Pakistan has a Viceroy (or a few) who decide matters like its govt and its election schedule, India doesn't. Today the stresses between Western strategic interests, their local collaborators and Pakistani people's rights are more than ever. Yet some people want to convince Indians that the INC was mistaken in its conduct of the independence movement, including in 1942.

I think Gandhi had experienced British behaviour during
world war I and after.

"Meanwhile the war came to end, and Gandhi learnt that the Sedition Committee Report had been published and the Government of India proposed to introduce legislation to curb civil liberties. He had been almost alone among Indian leaders who had argued for unconditional support to Britain in her hour of need in the hope of a worthy gesture at the end of he war. He felt that he had received stone for bread. He had done his best to keep out of political agitation during the war. Now he felt an irresistible call to fight a wrong perpetrated in peace."

So I guess there was not really a reason for Gandhi and
INC to wait for World War II to get over and then
start agitating because GB was fighting a war.

I think Gandhi had experienced British behaviour during
world war I and after.

"Meanwhile the war came to end, and Gandhi learnt that the Sedition Committee Report had been published and the Government of India proposed to introduce legislation to curb civil liberties. He had been almost alone among Indian leaders who had argued for unconditional support to Britain in her hour of need in the hope of a worthy gesture at the end of he war. He felt that he had received stone for bread. He had done his best to keep out of political agitation during the war. Now he felt an irresistible call to fight a wrong perpetrated in peace."

So I guess there was not really a reason for Gandhi and
INC to wait for World War II to get over and then
start agitating because GB was fighting a war.

Re: # 238

Majumdar:

The Brits thru war powers act or provision or ordinance had already assumed draconian powers. Jinnah was an important second fiddle, and he played it very well. For INC alternatives were stark continue peaceful agitation, any other thing would have been disastrous for the cause of freedom. No Indian leader of the time had any doubts (this is again my assumption) that India cannot get independence until after the war. Any act during the war would be viewed as subversive, afterall many jailed were charged for subversion, treason and sedition. Japanese and German option was never mainstream and had no currency with Gandhi and Nehru. Gandhi and Nehru were a lot smarter and ideologically very different from Japanese and Germans.

Only Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose wanted and followed it on the principle that enemy's enemy is our friend.

My submission was that outcome of QIM was not unkown before it was started. No QIM alternative meant stopping independence movement. Jinnah as second fiddle could do afford to do it, INC could not. Another point that I was unable to verify, was that the British gave tacit approval to INC as long as it would not divert resources, and will be peaceful.

Are you giving credit to QIM for the partition?

I am not. I have maintained that it patition happened a long before QIM. Jinah's demands almost accounted for legalized fudging of the electorate, no genuine Indian leader would have accepted. I am certain Jinnah knew it too. I think even though Jinnah wanted to delay publically. Don't think he privately knew he would not live long enough to see that day? He had a very terminal disease and died of it, and was on the treatment. Delay, among others were mere public posturing. If Sri Lanka, and Burma could got the Brits to stay longer, so could he have asked and kept the Brits longer in Pakistan, as long as he got his Pakistan. Divorce , separation had happened, and let India gain independence sooner.

Why did he not consider delaying this as the option for Pakistan, if his demand for the delay was genuine. He was not the leader of remainder of India to ask and get the delay for all of India.

At least we agree on one that QIM achieved right objective. You define partition as the unintended objective. I consider Quit India as the intended objective, and that there was a tacit support, and that the Brits may have even wanted INC to have peaceful movement going during the war, so that situation would not be more explosive after the war.

#242 majumdar sahib: after 60 years, it is about time your countrymen saw the light. :-)

#232 Posted by pavocavalry on December 11, 2007 12:19:15 pm

First one was a good read. Please post the second one if you find it.

Tahmed sahib,

Re: #241

Don't worry, my countrymen would soon see the folly of INC in 1942 (that is from the INC's POV, not mine) and also appreciate that QIM had unintended good consequences for India.

Regards

majumdar #238 this is precisely what i have been arguing about on chowk, to the annoyance of your countrymen on chowk. seems like not too many people see beyond their nose on QIM on what should be a no-brainer even back in 1942!! perhaps jinnah got it because he was smarter, or he got it because he had the character to not kick a man when he is down (as the brits were in 1942).

Re: # 234----Thanks for all this solidarity Okhla Sahib.The reality is that any person who speaks the truth is an enemy of state in pakistn.The Bengalis gave seats from Bengal to many major West Pakistani major politicians from Bengal as they had no home constituency and these politicians paid back by being more anti Bengali.In order to terrorise Bengali Hindus from East Pakistan singled out as a group West Pakistani politicians both Punjabi and Hindustani enforced separate electorate.Note that East Pakistani Hindus were the most progressive element, a larger number being leftists.


In Pakistan the rule is that if you are a munafiq u succeed.May be that is the same in India also.I dont know that.

Coming back to kargil, hre is a previous post by me.
http://www.chowk.com/interacts/6348/1/0/176#139433
If anything, Kargil was a reminder that the international perception is heavily loaded against Pakistan. It also made a routine LOC violation look dangerous beyond all propotions and because of the Mujahadeen factor created a fient but an inextricable link between the Kashmir freedom struggle and terrorism. Most it saw two neighbours loaded with nuclear weapons fight a limited conventional conflict in which Pakistan flinched first.

Violations across the LOC have been routine. Over time India has been successful in nibbling at SiaChin, Jaswa, Kiran and many other areas.If viewed in the context of Simla, these violations already make Simla redundant. What Pakistan tried tactically was to severe the base leading to Siachin by cutting off Dras Kargil and dominating the Tortuk-Leh funnel. Incase the political rheoteric had been confined to SiaChin, Pakistan could have probably held on and forced India to negotiate. Unfortunately political ambition went far beyond leading to Mujahideenisation of the whole issue. This rattled the entire international community wherein Pakistan stood isolated. Alas! we never had a statesman with the resience to handle the crises and so be it.

Anilji,

What exactly did INC hope to achieve by QIM in 1942? Were they expecting to blackmail the Brits into giving them independence?

And if indeed they did get the independence how did they propose to defend themselves against the Japs or Germans if they came into India? It would have been fun of course if the Brits had actually left in 1942 and let the Japs occupy India. I can just smack at my lips at the thought of what the Japs would have done to MKG and JLN had they entered India!!!

And what if they failed? Did they expect that the Brits would be thrilled with them that the Injuns had rebelled against them when they were fighting a life and death war against the Axis Powers?

In any case it is our great good luck that INC did QIM in 1942 and made sure that the Brits would be more sympathetic to the demands of MAJ (pbuh) when the dust had settled!!!

Regards

Yes, Kargil was a watershed and as written by Nazar Hayat Khan, Pakistan will have to come to terms with it. Agha is right when he says that it was also the end of era for those romantic soldiers and young officers.

Come 9/11, and the same soldiers were launched in the tribal areas to fight a disowned war.They operate in a hostile grey environment created by prolifertation of too may agencies.

okhla99 # 234,

"where had you been all these years"

And I always thought everybody in Pakistan knew A. H. Amin!

It's still hard to get over the fact that he has decided to come to chowk.

okhla bhai, A. H. Amin is one of those rare individuals who write the absolute truth as they see it (with which one may disagree). He does not "interpret," nor "shade" to suit pre-determined ideological purposes. And he knows more about Pakistan than most of us ever will.

It is embarrassingly obvious: I have long been and am a complete fan. Did I already say I can't figure out what a man like him is doing among us? :)

Amin sahib,

Thanks for taking time out to post on chowk. Your articles have been quite enlightening. Especially your posts on Kargil quite clearly debunk the myth that it was Mujahideens who did the fighting there.

What about the Talibs who conquered A'stan in 1995? Were they just ordinary Pushtoon Afghan students who arose spontaneously and took over the country or were they widely backed by the Pak Army including tanks and aircrafts as is alleged. If you could shed some light on the matter. Thanks in advance.

Regards

Pavo Bhai,

Aap kamaal hain!!!

Where had you been all these years??? Your articles have provided a rare insight and you now have a considerable following on chowk.

Salaam Sir.

Majumdar:

You and Kaal are part of greater majority of Today's India who would endorse partition that happened in their grandparents generation (this generation is 40% of India).

I grant there may be some like gujju banias from this generation who may have other thoughts, but then you have many like me from parents generation who always believed partition was essential. A fact that was resolved when the minds were partitioned.

HP quotes Wiki, which only shows a lack of understanding of forces and dynamics of that time. British were almost bankrupt, their industries and economy were battered during the process. They could not have fought the war without the support and resources from the commonwealth. This included Royal Indian Army, with very large muslim strength.

QIM convinced the Brits that they cannot keep the leaders in jail and rule, they cannot cannot prosecute and prevail, they cannot let them out and rule. Any doubts in their mind were gone after a mutiny which was organized the communist, that demobilized soldiers will only add fuel and start the fire, which is only peaceful at that time.

There is substantial evidence of the above in India papers that you find in Cambridge University library.

However, what is not clear is whether it was the Brits plan to jail and face a peaceful QIM which would neither divert nor deprive them of military resources during the war. I would not be surprised that it is for this reason they may have struck a separate deal with Jinnah on muslim grounds, and may have given certain assurances to him regarding Pakistan. Royal Indian Army had very larger muslim component.

It is also not clear whether they had realized before jailing leaders that they would find themselves in a corner from where their task would be only to "Quit India." There is evidence in these papers of negotiations between the Brits and INC leaders to seek assurances to not disturb the peace that could hurt British and Commonwealth war efforts.

I am ready to presume that both Gandhi and Nehru favored Brits over Japanese or Germans, and could have realized this stalemate for the Brits of being in the corner with only one escape to Quit India. Therefore, they may have seen Quit India as the only option for the Brits and for themselves to keep peace and keep independence movement going.

Hence launch it rather than abandon it. They had nothing to loose, other than being in the cooler. They probably also realized that there was a lot to gain, as alternative would have been to suspend Independence movement. History was in front of them, when during the earlier war Indians stopped and cooperated with the Brits on the promise of Home Rule(name ??). Brits changed their mind after the war.

Quit India's premise was that Congress wanted sooner, Jinnah wanted more time. I am certain that Jinnah knew his demand would not hold water with the Brits in the absence of Congress support for the delay. Jinnah must have thrown this card in to negotiate something else.

QIM achieved its goal - Quit India sooner, which obviously was not in line with Jinnah and Muslim League's objectives.

I am not sure, if it was possible for Jinnah a movement for Brits to "Not Quit Pakistan" atleast for a few more years. Something like this indeed happend in Sri Lanka and Burma.

Re: # 231---I can presently find only one.

#221 Posted by pavocavalry on December 11, 2007 11:27:00 am


I have been critical of Kargil.Attached are my two articles on Kargil published in 2002.


nice. but I only see one.

Re: # 228:--- THE LAST REMEDY-PUBLISHED IN NATION LAHORE-NOVEMBER OR DECEMBER 2003

Authors Note:-- I have never been a religious man not having gopne to a msoque
for more than 20 years but the idea that appeals to me is " rebellion against
tyranny and injustice".

This article was written only because of disgust with opportunism worldwide.

A.H Amin
05 Nov 2005


13 Oct 2003

Heroes versus Opportunists



When all remedies fail and all wisdom is promiscuously degraded into
naked pragmatic opportunism twisted to suit personal ends glorified
as idealistic collective aspirations , the last remedy is neither
outwardly brilliant , nor apparently wise, but one that alters the
course of history at best and instills some semblance of fear of God
in the men at the helm of affairs !



Consider the following incidents, all precise historical realities,
some stranger than fiction, albeit true!



On pretext of training and with a design to hurt the religious
sentiments of his soldiers an over strict martinet of a British
commanding officer denied Eid leave to sepoys of 4/2nd Punjab
Regiment in the not too distant year of 1938 . Somewhere in the
field near Amangarh Ranges in Nowshera one fine winter night in
November 1938 , a day before Eid ,a Punjabi Muslim soldier decided
that the matter could only be vindicated by a caliber 303 Lee
Enfield Rifle ! During the night this indomitable soul ran amok and
shot dead four British officers , the first being the commanding
officer of the Regiment and also three Indian VCOs ,more loyal than
the king ! The British hushed up the incident, as few in Pakistan
know today , , keeping in line with foxy old policy of " conspiracy
of silence" ! The unit was quietly disbanded! Nevertheless fear of
God was driven home well, albeit backed by the mighty swift force of
kinetic energy of 303 caliber projectiles! The assailant was killed,
but the example he set was well understood, i.e. do not
underestimate the religious sentiments of your men!



In yet another incident earlier in 1904 Sepoy Kabul Khan , hailing
from a fine P[akhtun tribe , the Abur Rehman Khel sub section of the
Bahlolzai section of the illustriopus Mahsud tribe shot dead Captain
J.B Bowring the Political SAgent of Waziristan in the middle of the
nioght through the head ! In a subsequent dialogue soon after the
incident the simple sepoy explained that he had a clear conscience
since " Bowring was sleeping with his feet towards Mecca"
and "therefore I shot him " ! Later Kabul Khan surrendered , threw
his rifle without fear of death and was shot dead , dying with a
clean conscience !



In 1984 two valiant Sikhs inscribed another lesson in the sands of
time with their blood ! No heavy ranked corps commanders like Brar
who slavishly followed orders to storm the Golden Temple despite
being a Sikh in name ! These were simple souls , one an ordinary
constable Satwant Singh and the other a Sub Inspector Beant Singh !
On the morning of 31st October 1984 at 9.38 precisely these two
fearless men pumped seven bullets of a Sten Gun and revolver into
the vital organs of Durga Devi ! No missiles test fired at unknown
test sites but simple bullets which did the job which no missiles
may ever ironically do ! The men died but the message that they gave
in martyrdom lives !



In 1978 Egyptian president Anwar Sadat a complexed man inflicted
with a highly dangerous disease ofcshameless opportunism betrayed
the Arab Muslim cause at Camp David ! This betrayal was avenged by a
lieutenant name Khalid Islambouli in 1981 !



Islambouli was executed , he never perhaps wanted to be a red tape
without conscience , but he remains a hero in the eyes of many who
have the heart to feel and the courage to think beyond immediate
self interest !



The Holy Bible says " What shall it profit a man , if he shall gain
the whole world and lose his soul ! (Bible-Mark 8:36).Compare this
with the shameless opportunism of so many Suhartos and Sadats , the
apparently wise men who lost wars but ruled their own people with
help of Western powers ! I hold that militarily 1973 War was won by
Israelis ! Perhaps the only war that the Israeils may lose is the
present one against the guerrilla forces of Islam !



What is the life of a man ? Pilot Officer V.A Roseware who perished
in the Battlle of Britain in 1940 explained this enigma in a letter
written to his mother shortly before his death at the age of 25 0r
26 in the following words " The universe is so vast and so ageless
that the lifec of one man can only be justified by the measure of
his sacrifice" !



In Armughan I Hijaz the poet philosopher Iqbal says " Why there is
no storm in your river ? Why your ego is nota true Muslim? It is
absoolutely useless to complain against the destiny determined by
God ? Why are you notb the destiny of God yourself ? "



The Kamikaze pilots who crashed theior planes sacrificing their
lives in second world war had the following motto " Like a blossom
today then scattered , life is like a delicate flower ! How can one
expect the fragrance to last forver ? "



When will leaders of Islam get out of the whirlpool of cheap
existence and opportunism ! Bending obsequiously , and clicking
their heels while shaking hands with US assistant secretaries of
state !



Acclaiming their masters and basking in the glory of a passive
foreign policy which has divided the Muslim world , facilitating the
US task to defeat all Islamic forces piecemeal , one by one while ,
many others run after carrots suspended in mid air by USA as baits !
All is well while Syria is attacked by Israeli fighters while US
Assistant Secretary of state visits Islamabad !



What is the idea of life ! To get a green card ! To build a palatial
bungalow in Zamzama Scheme or Bani Gala ! To make costly
condominiums and penthouses next to a creek overflowing with the
phenomenal load of half the gutters of Karachi !





When I sometimes sleep a student of mine in Armour school shakes my
shoulder in a dream ! Tiwana then a captain as I saw him in 1990-
91 , later embracing ,martyrdom in Kargil in 1999 as a major tells
me " Sir I am very unhappy , do you know how we died , do you know
what happened to us , we had volunteered to fight for the cause of
Islam" ! Once this dream ends I imagine the heroes of those rocky
pinnacles!

" Piles of bones, once animated by the proud breath of life ,now
merely scattered limbs ,nameless remains , human chaos ,sacred
agglomeration of countless relics – God shall recognize you , the
dust of heroes !



Perhaps history will not forgive leaders whop betrayed their
nations! Leaders who usurped power by virtue of their institutional
positions earned after years of cheap manoeuvring and sycophancy !



What is the use of massive military hardwares , impressive
missiles , macho camouflaged uniforms once the leaders have no will
to fight ! What is the use of a top heavy military bureaucracy which
seeks glory in playing the part of the pragmatic docile subsidiary
vassal !



Why do common people become suicide bombers ! It is so because
conventional armies of the Muslim world have to failed to do their
job in battle , yet they enjoy moviong around with swagger and
bravado claiming that they are the most martial military machines in
the history of mankind !



The pleasant future that the US policy makers may have promised the
relatively naieve Pakistani policy makers is essentially only a
carrot to make the mule do its job !

Re: # 227---At the ideal level you may be right but who will do it.Divided politicians since the judicial murder of ZAB , docile army ,a common man in grip of inflation,too many police to terrorise the common man.I think there is no hope.

#225 thanks. shall look it up in these libraries which are within reach.

#222 pavocavalry: again, this description of kargill is consistent with what i had heard, and very educational at least for me since i had not read any written accounts on kargill.

Wasnt the main purpose of kargill to sabotage peace talks between two elected pms? Shouldnt musharraf be brought to court for undertaking this sabotage of the nation's elected government? and also held to account for the hundreds of lives lost on both sides?

How can the Pakistan military regain its honor in the eyes of ordinary Pakistanis unless it faces up to such lawless actions?

Re: # 224:-- This was after they published my articles " The Last Remedy" and " The Gathering Storm" in Statesman Peshawar.

Re: # 223:-- You may find Pakistan Army in 1965 in Library of Congress,Combined Arms Research Library Fort Leavenworth US Army Staff College,US Army War College Carlisle Pennsylvania Library,US Armor School Fort Knox Library or National Library of Australia.

pavocavalry@hotmail.com Messenger: Offline
Free Newsletters


Reply | Reply All | Forward | Delete | Junk | Put in Folder
| Print View | Save Address



Inbox
Sent Messages
Drafts
Trash Can
Articles
Arts-1-Jan...
ARTS-1-MAY...
Arts-1-Sep...
Arts-1st-J...
Arts- 1st-M...
Arts-1st-M...
Arts-Ist-J...
IVAN CONSI...
Mail Sent
MAIL-RECVD...
OMAR.R.QUR...
Postal Add...
PP
Report Junk E-Mail
Report and Block Sender

Sign in
Sign out

New Instant Message
Add Messenger Contacts
Messenger Options



From : The Statesman
Sent : Saturday, October 25, 2003 6:56 PM
To :
Subject : your article

| | | MAIL-RECVD... | Inbox


dear sir
your first article (Oct 11) caused a stir in GHQ, therefore it is
not possible for us to publish "Pakistan's Strategic Dilemma"
hope you will understand
thanx and regards
ghulam mustafa
the statesman
peshawar

#220 pavocavalry: anything available online? (i am not in pakistan, so hard to get to the pindi army library, e.g.)

Musharraf's Secret War in Kargil

by A. H. Amin

Media Monitors Network May 2002

Kargil stands as perhaps the final military effort on Pakistan's part to settle the Kashmir dispute by military means.

Analysis has mostly centered around political aspects of the operation while the military aspects have been largely left to the imagination of the public. Lately it has been claimed that Kargil was launched to bail out Mujahideen as a last resort ! This is an insult to the memory of the Pakistani armed forces "Volunteers" who died in that Himalayan wasteland without a funeral and in circumstances of unimaginable misery !

Kargil operation cannot be understood unless the personalities and motives of the principal characters are examined ! Every action in history is the final culmination of a personality's self perception, ambition and subconscious as well as conscious urges.

In this context the Kargil operation was born out of two key factors ! One was the personality of general Pervez Musharraf and the second was the un-ceremonial manner in which Nawaz Sharif ousted General Jahangir Karamat Musharraf's predecessor army chief of Pakistan Army.

Musharraf as those who have served with him know which includes this scribe also has always been an intensely ambitious man ! One hallmark of his personality is that he wants to stand out as a great military commander ! Propelled by an enormous ego wherever he served he endeavored to do something extraordinary ! However fate did not allow him the glory in battle which his other course-mates like shabbir sharif achieved ! In 1965 Musharraf was a subaltern in an artillery unit which saw little action apart from supporting operations by indirect fire ! The 16 SP unlike 3 SP which fired on Indian tanks with direct gun-sights at Chawinda stayed in conventional artillery role ! In 1971 Musharraf's commando company was not involved in action ! Nevertheless Musharraf compensated for this lack of combat laurels by achieving laurels in army courses and in various command assignments ! His final opportunity came when he ascended to the post of army chief in a situation when the army was! in a subservient position vis-à-vis the civilian head of state , something which was regarded by the military hierarchy as worse than blasphemy !

The forced retirement of General Karamat by prime minister Nawaz Sharif was regarded as a personal defeat by the Pakistani military brass and by Musharraf who felt that he would be a far weaker army chief under a strong prime minister who had asserted civilian control over the military machine !

These two factors were the fathers of the Kargil operation ! Ambition accompanied by a perception that the Pakistani public must be convinced that the soldiers were better than politicians.

Kargil at the military level was the brainchild of three men i.e. General Musharraf the army chief,Aziz the then army Chief of general Staff and Mahmud the then corps commander 10 Corps ! Musharraf and Mahmud were motivated by intense ambition to achieve military glory and Aziz was motivated by his Kashmiri ancestry plus military ambition. The person they selected to execute the operation was again one distinguished by out of proportion ambition i.e. Major General Javed Hassan , author of a book in 1990s that claimed that India was on its way to disintegration and in which moughal king Humayun was resurrected from the grave to fight at Second Battle of Panipat !

In November December 1998 just one month after Musharraf's elevation to the post of army chief volunteers were asked for at the army level for an operation in Kashmir ! Many thousand volunteered including both officers and men from various units !

At no stage did any Mujahideen enter Kargil ! This is a piece of fiction and has no veracity !

These were attached to NLI units in the 80 Brigade sector for training. The principal idea of the plan was to infiltrate four battalions of NLI (Northern light Infantry) stationed in 80 Brigade Sector into Kargil Heights overlooking and dominating the Srinagar Ladakh road the lone Indian link with the Siachen and Leh Sectors ! The idea being to cut the lifeline of Indian supplies to Leh and Siachen Sectors ! Indian held heights in Kargil were to be occupied in February 1999 while Indian infantry had abandoned these heights at the approach of winter snow as an annual routine since 1948.In occupying the heights no fighting was involved ! The real issue was that of supplying Pakistani troops holding these heights which was far more difficult from the Pakistani side than from the Indian side !

Plans were kept secret and even the Commander 10 Corps Engineers of was not allowed to enter the Operations Room in 10 Corps Pindi.

The distance involved in reaching the heights varied from 15 to 35 kilometers from Pakistan side over mountains as high as 13 to 19,000 feet .To do this each battalion was divided into two parts , one acting as porters taking supplies forward and one half occupying the heights.

The heights were occupied as per the plan but the four units while doing so were severely exhausted ! In March-April the Indians discovered the Pakistani presence and reacted severely ! Severe fighting continued till July once the Indians finally re-captured the heights after Pakistani troops had been left to the mercy of Indian artillery and overwhelming troop concentrations as a result of the Blair House Accord !

A brief military examination of the plan reveals following weaknesses.(1) Failure to assess strategic repercussions of the operation at geo-politic and national strategic level .(2) Logistic failure in incorrect appreciation of supplying the troops . (3) Failure to understand that by occupying the heights the Indians were driven into a corner and had no choice but to retaliate , not for glory as was the Pakistani military's case but for pure military survival . (4) At a more subtle level the use of the Chora-Batalik Sector as a future spring board for Pakistani operations against India was sealed since Indians heavily fortified this sector for any future war.

The Pakistani planners failed to assess that war as an instrument of policy is no longer in vogue at the international level and their temporary military success would only bring greater international censure and a negative war mongering image without any corresponding military gain at the strategic level.

This scribe interviewed a former commander of FCNA and 10 Corps about logistics and General Imtiaz Warraich replied as following :-

"We initiated this operation but failed to support it with comprehensive operational planning and above all buildup for essential logistic support without which no operation can succeed"......'" the principal reason for our heavy casualties and lack of progress was unimaginative and callous logistic operations to support the units".

At one point the sepoys who had volunteered to fight and had come from many other infantry units to the NLI units refused to act as porters carrying supplies over 15 kilometres and were so exasperated that they defied Javed Hassan's personal orders in unit durbars to carry supplies and when Javed Hassn threw his cap on the ground threatened to march over it unless they were not employed as porters ! One such volunteer told this scribe that we had volunteered to fight ,not to act as porters ! The same fact was also mentioned in ISI chief Ziauddin Butt's secret report to Nawaz Sharif prepared by an Engineer officer on Zia's staff in ISI !

The failure to assess the "Enemy" factor was another strategic planning failure at the highest level .I asked General Warraich this question and he stated " Capture of Kargil Heights would totally stop all Indian movement to Leh and Ladakh Sectors unlike Pakistan in Siachen and Indians had no option but to do and die " !

Lust for glory and honour in battle are perfectly reasonable aspirations as long as they are accompanied by commensurate military talent in the generals who are at the helm of affairs ! This was sadly lacking in the Musharraf team who planned the operation. Their egos were many times larger than their real military talent !

By promoting an intensely ambitious man to the rank of army chief Nawaz did a favor which could only be repaid by betrayal ! The plan was based not on sound military reasoning but on burning ambition and an unrealistic desire for glory by men far away from the heat of battle ! No one above major level died , yet in a report to the military secretary's branch Javed Hassan recommended retiring 75 % of officers involved in the operation below colonel level !

The prime minister was not fully briefed because of ulterior motives ! Had the operation succeeded it would have been projected as a proof of Musharraf's Napoleonic brilliance and if it failed as it did Nawaz Sharif would have been made the scapegoat !

The operations planners were distinguished neither by loftiness of thought, nor audacity in the conduct of battle at the operational or strategic level. Thus boldness at tactical level was sacrificed because of operational and tactical timidity at the highest level.

No one appreciated that the army men who were employed , and it is a fiction that there was a single Mujahid in Kargil, had flesh and blood ! These men mourned by a few hundred families were sons husbands fathers and brothers !

The Kargil operation at the military level is a watershed ! Idealism that propelled many hundred to die in those Himalayan wastes is buried for good ! Now there is a new breed which dominates the army ! The ones who aim at going on lush UN second-ments or to KESC,WAPDA or as well paid consultants !

What can one conclude ! It was the human heart that failed in Kargil and this heart which failed was housed in the ribcage of men sitting in the GHQ and not on the rocky pinnacles of Kargil ! Once the supply lines were closed under Indian threat of a counter attack , these brave men all Pakistan Army regulars were abandoned to die, pounded by artillery fire , bayoneted by overwhelming numbers , weakened by starvation ! Who can hear their cries ! Our ears are covered with heaps of lies ! Truth died at Kargil ! What remains is a bodyguard of lies!

I have been critical of Kargil.Attached are my two articles on Kargil published in 2002.

There are about 30 maps which I drew.These you may find in an issue of Defence Journal March 2001 in one of the libraries or elsewhere.Maps may also be found in my book in London Book Company Islamabad .

pavocavalry: That is a very interesting and informative account of the Chawinda battle. I had heard the phillaurah battle of September 11 described by the CO 11 cav - and the broader picture of the chawinda battle you describe is certainly consistent with the ground level action i had heard.

Do you have any links which provide a map of the battleground?

in case it helps fill some holes, let me add a bit of what i had heard from the CO of the phillaurah action: after transferring from the Chhamb sector, 11 cav regiment faced three armored regiments of the indian "haathi" division (1 armored div). the indian attack started in the morning with one regiment advancing towards a dug-in 11 cav squadron on the right flank, the latter knocking out a couple of indian tanks, with the indian regiment then pulling back. the indians then tried attacking the other flank, and pulled back too. indian artillery then started heavy artillery fire, knocked out the regimental HQ (seriously wounding the CO 11 cav - who was saved by the bravery of one of his captains who drove up in a jeep even as the areas was shelled and there was hardly anything visible in the dust and smoke, and carried the CO and his driver to a field hospital - and killing a pakistani artillery colonel who was also at the 11 cav regimental HQ at that time).

11 cav gave good account of itself in Chhamb-Jaurian and were heading to akhnoor when told to disengage and move to sialkot. if akhnoor had been taken - and this was quite possible given that the indians were now on the run - then pakistan forces would have broken the only land link between india and kashmir. and there is a good chance that could have been done (since the indians were on the run), if ayub khan had not played politics now that the attack was successful and put the over-cautious yahya in charge.

pavocavalry,

Ok. You've covered 1965 pretty well. How about Kargill?

You have suggested that the political government should have been removed by the military right then intead of October 1999. It then appears you believe Kargill's objectives could indeed have been met had a withdrawal not taken place.

How so? What were the objectives? Could those have been met without a full-scale and winnable war? Was a full-scale war winnable?

Thanks in advance.

Re: # 215:-- Waziristan is unique.Once the Mughals started fighting with the Pashtun tribes they lost an excellent source of Pahtun soldiers for their army.

#214 Posted by pavocavalry,

Hmm ... it's pretty widely believed though.

#210 Posted by viqarm,

Hehe ... THEY had been defending Pakistan instead of the other way around. Remember Pakistan never needed to deploy any troops on the Western border. Only on the Eastern ones.

Re: # 213:-- TOTAL MYTH.ALL LIES AS FAR AS I HAVE RESEARCHED SIR.

#211 Posted by pavocavalry,

?????

... in your description of the Chwinda tank battle, you made no mention of the kamikaze bombers under Indian tank tracks. Is it reality or myth?

Re: # 207

Comedy of Higher Command Errors

Major Shamshad¡¯s excellent and thought provoking articles published in the Defence Journal in 1997-98 on the Battle of Chawinda, inspired this scribe to redraft parts of his book ¡°The Pakistan Army till 1965¡± and present them in form of an article devoted exclusively to the Chawinda Battles. The article is a humble attempt to integrate the picture incorporating viewpoints of both sides and to analyse the Battle of Chawinda in its larger perspective.

Maj (Retd) AGHA HUMAYUN AMIN examines this crucial battle objectively.

Introduction

The tank battles fought in the area between Charwa and Chawinda from 8th to 21 September 1965 were the most decisive battles of the 1965 War . Initially the Indians were very close to victory while in the last stages the Pakistan Army was in a relatively better position to launch a counterstroke which could have forced the Indians to abandon all gains made inside the Shakargarh Bulge from 7th September.

The Chawinda Battles also gave birth to many myths as far as the Pakistan Army was concerned. Many conflicting claims were made about ¡®Military Effectiveness¡¯ ¡®Martial Fervour¡¯ etc citing the ¡®Battles of Chawinda¡¯ as an example. The Indian commanders were also criticised for phenomenal incompetence, but somehow they rationalised their failures as a case of normal failure in face of technically superior tanks.

Pakistani Dispositions

Pakistani dispositions in Ravi-Chenab Corridor where the battle of Chawinda was fought were as following:-- (ONE) 8 Division consisting of four infantry brigades (24,101,104 and 115 Brigades) four armoured regiments (20 Lancers,25 Cavalry, 31 & 33 TDU 1) defending Sialkot-Pasrur Sector and Jassar. The total frontage that this division had to defend was approximately 180,000 yards. 2 But this was only a theoretically awesome figure, because till 1965, keeping in view the force to space ratio in terms of divisions available, the Indians were not in a position to be effective as a threat all along this frontage. (TWO) 6 Armoured Division in Chenab Ravi Corridor3 to defend the area from any Indian incursion. The 6 Armoured Division was not a full strength division and consisted of a divisional headquarter, three armoured regiments (one of which was in Chamb for Grand Slam) two artillery regiments, two motorised infantry regiments and had no brigade headquarter. Initially it was placed at Gujranwala but later placed at Pasrur4. This Division according to Musa was placed at Pasrur with the express intention of dealing with enemy¡¯s main attack which was expected on the Jassar-Sialkot approach.5

Indian War Plan

The Main Indian Attack was aimed at decisively disrupting the Pakistani defensive layout and resultantly forcing Pakistan to commit its main armoured reserves for defence was to be launched by the newly formed Indian 1 Corps comprising the 1st Armoured Division and three infantry divisions (6 Mountain Division 14 Division and 26 Division) in the Ravi-Chenab Corridor from Samba area on the general axis Samba-Chawinda-Phillora-MRL Link and eventually secure line Daska-Dhallewali-Mandhali6. In other words the Indian aim as stated by another Indian military writer was to ¡®cut off Sialkot from Lahore¡¯.7 As per the wording of the decisions taken at the planning conference of the Indian Chief of Army Staff held on 9th August the object of the 1 Corps attack aimed at Daska was ¡®with a view to relieving Jammu¡¯.8 This meant that the Indian Army Chief viewed a Pakistani attack on Jammu with a view to severe the Indian line of communication as most likely. This attack was rightly termed as ¡®Riposte¡¯ by some Indian authors.Riposte has been defined as ¡®Striking a vulnerable point thus forcing the enemy to abandon his attack¡¯.9

The Battle of Chawinda

The main Indian attack against Pakistan was launched by the Ist Indian Corps opposite Chawinda in Sialkot Sector. The Sialkot Sector was defended by the Pakistani 1 Corps comprising 15 Division and 6 Armoured Division. From 1956 onwards the 1 Corps was the only corps of the Pakistan Army. Till 1965 its area of operational responsibility extended from river Chenab till Sulaimanke in the north and it consisted of 1st Armoured Division, 6 Armoured Division,10,11 and 15 Divisions. The 1 Corps since soon after its creation in 1956 was commanded by Lieutenant General Bakhtiar Rana10 whose basic qualifications were described as extreme loyalty and limited intellect by many contemporaries! In early September the frontage of the corps was reduced to the area between Ravi and Chenab rivers or simply the Ravi-Chenab Corridor, and its under command formations were reduced to the 6 Armoured Division and 15 Division.

Pakistani Dispositions and Plans:- 15 Division (four infantry brigades, four tank regiments) was designated to defend the area of responsibility while the newly formed 6 Armoured Division (previously known as 100 Armoured Brigade) was the main strategic reserve in the area. The total frontage of 15 Division was 180,000 yards and the distribution of forces/dispositions/tasks were as following11:--

15 Division:- This division was commanded by Brigadier Sardar Mohammad Ismail Khan from the ASC. Its defences were organised as following:-

115 Brigade:-- The main task of this brigade was to defend the area along the river Ravi with special emphasis on Jassar bridge over river Ravi. The brigade had two infantry battalions, one tank regiment (33 TDU), one R & S company and two artillery batteries (one field and one mortar).

24 Brigade:-- Defend area Chobara-Phillaura and be prepared to attack an enemy force which seek to attack the Sialkot Sector (i.e. 15 Division area of responsibility). It was a sort of a reserve/counterattack force. The brigade had two infantry battalions, one tank regiment (25 Cavalry), one R & S company, and one field artillery regiment less a battery in direct support.

101 Brigade:-- Defending Sialkot city against enemy attack along main Jammu-Sialkot road and also to be prepared to go on the offensive in case of an enemy concentration in Phillaura area. The brigade had two infantry battalions,one R & S company, one tank squadron (ex 31 TDU) and one field regiment and a mortar battery less troop in direct support.

104 Brigade:-- This was a reserve brigade but had just one infantry battalion, one tank regiment (31 TDU) minus one squadron and a field regiment less battery in direct support.

One infantry battalion in an independent role to defend the crucial Marala Headworks.

Covering Troops/Advance Positions:--

One tank regiment (20 Lancers) less squadron deployed in front as covering troops from Chaprar till main Jammu-Sialkot road. 20 Lancers was the corps recce regiment.

One tank squadron (20 Lancers) with one infantry company, one R & S company deployed as advance position on main Sialkot Jammu road in area Raspur-Kundanpur.

One R & S company as screen on border to cover the front from Bajra Garghi to Charwa.

One R & S platoon with R & S Battalion Headquarter in Shakargarh area.

Rangers (border police) to keep the border between Chaprar and Marala Headworks under observation.

12 Mujahid Companies (Militia) and rangers all along the border subdivided into small posts for observation/local defence.

NOTE:-- There were a total of 24 Rangers/Mujahid Companies in 15 Division area. These were of limited military value and could not face regular Indian Army.

6 Armoured Division:- 6 Armoured Division was not an armoured division in the full sense but did have a large number of the organisational ingredients of an armoured division. It was commanded by Major General Ibrar Hussain. It was the 1 Corps reserve and was the main Pakistani armoured reserve in the Ravi-Chenab Corridor with the primary role to take on an enemy strike force attacking 1 Corps area of responsibility. According to Musa the most expected line of Indian approach in 1 Corps defended area was the Sialkot Jassar Corridor12 and the 6th Armoured Division was to be used in a defensive role against an enemy offensive in 1 Corps area.According to Gul Hassan it was also visualised that the 6 Armoured Division could be used to attack the Jammu sector but later on this idea was dropped13. The 6 Armoured Division was a curious division for it had no brigade headquarters! On 6th September 1965 it was in dispersal in Gujranwala-Nandipur area. It had the following units14:-

Guides Cavalry (10th Cavalry)
22 Cavalry

11 Cavalry (On loan to 12 Division/7 Division for Operation Grand Slam since late August 1965 and in Chamb area on 6th September 1965.

Two infantry battalions one of which was in Kharian as defence battalion with the 1 Corps Headquarter.

One self-propelled field artillery regiment and one medium battery. Later on from 6th September onwards the formidable and extremely well organised 4 Corps Artillery Brigade consisting of one field, one medium, one heavy and one locating regiment was also affiliated with it.
One engineer and one signal battalion.

Indian Dispositions and Plans:- The Indian 1 Corps was deployed opposite the Pakistani 1 Corps. The 1 Corps consisted of one armoured division (1st Armoured Division) and three infantry divisions (6 Mountain Division,14 Infantry Division and 26 Infantry Division). The 1 Corps was the principal Indian strike force and was tasked to launch the main Indian attack inside Pakistan.The main task of this corps in words of K.C Praval was to ¡®cut off Sialkot from Lahore¡¯ and this was to be done by attacking from general area Samba east of Jammu and advancing in a southwesternly direction cutting the Sialkot-Jammu road around Daska15 as already discussed in the earlier part of this chapter. Gurcharan Singh described 1 Corps task as ¡®secure a bridgehead extending to line Bhagowal-Phillora cross roads junction south of Tharoah with a view to advancing to the eastern bank of the MRL canal¡¯ with the possibility of advancing further to line Dhalewali-Wahulai-Daska-Mandhali¡¯16. The initial objectives of this attack were capturing Phillora Chawinda and Pagowal areas.Distribution of forces/dispositions and formation tasks were as following17:--

1st Armoured Division:-- It was the spearhead of the Indian offensive. This formation was much weaker in numerical/organisational terms from the 1st Pakistani Armoured Division i.e. having only four tank regiments and lorried infantry battalions and two brigade headquarters. 62 Tank regiment was therefore taken from 26 Division and assigned to it as the fifth tank regiment.It was tasked to advance inside Pakistani territory on general axis Ramgarh-Phillora-Pagowal-Chawinda-MRL from first light 8th September after the 6 Mountain Division had secured the bridgehead in Maharajke-Charwa area.As per the Divisional plan this advance was to be conducted on two axis with 43 Lorried Brigade on the right and 1st Armoured Brigade on the left. The 1st Armoured Division was organised as following:--

1st Armoured Brigade:- It consisted of two tank regiments (17 Poona Horse, 16 Light Cavalry) one tank squadron (from 62 Cavalry), and one and a quarter infantry battalion (lorry borne) etc which was tasked to advance in the first phase on axis Ramgarh-Harbal-Sabzkot-Chobara-Phillora. Tasks/Groupings for operations till MRL canal after capture of Phillora were to be given later.

43 Lorried Brigade:- Grouped as one full tank regiment (2 Lancers), one tank regiment less squadron (62 Cavalry) and two lorried infantry battalions tasked to advance on axis Salehriyah-Saidanwali-Cross roads-Mastpur-Ahmad Pur-Pagowal.

Divisional Reserve:- One tank regiment (4 Hodson¡¯s Horse) and one lorried infantry company.

6 Mountain Division:- This division was the principal infantry component of the 1 Corps offensive battle and was tasked to secure the bridgehead inside Pakistani territory from where the 1st Armoured Division was to be launched on the thrust towards MRL canal.Its initial task was to secure the bridgehead in area Maharajke-Charwa and exploit till line Ahmadpur-Nauni.It was tasked to commence the attack at 2300 hours on 7th September 1965.18 It had the following troops for the bridgehead operation:-

69 Mountain Brigade:- The right forward assaulting brigade in the 6 MountainDivision bridgehead operation. It had three battalions and a tank squadron from 62 Cavalry and was tasked to capture Maharajke area in the first phase of the 1 Corps operation.

99 Mountain Brigade:- The left forward assaulting brigade in the 6 Mountain Division bridgehead operation.It consisted of three infantry battalions and was tasked to capture Charwa in the Corps phase one.

35 Infantry Brigade:- Originally from 14 Division, this brigade consisted of three infantry battalions and was placed under command 6 Mountain Division specifically for the bridgehead operation. It was the reserve brigade of the 6 Mountain Division and was earmarked for unforeseen tasks.

14 Infantry Division:- In the initial Indian attack plan this formation was supposed to take full part in the I Indian Corps offensive in Sialkot sector. However the peculiar developments of events in September 1965 dictated otherwise and this formation played a limited role in the 1 Corps operation. These reasons are explained in detail in note 146.19 The Division played no role in the initial battles of 8 to 10 September 1965 as its 35 was under 6 Mountain and 1st Armoured Division but was assigned a limited role from 11/12th September to attack Zafarwal. Its 116 Brigade reached Samba area from Pathankot on 10th September and became the first brigade to function under command 14 Division opposite general area Zafarwal.20

26 Infantry Division:- This formation consisted of three infantry brigades (19,162 & 168) and one tank regiment (18th Cavalry).19 Brigade had two infantry battalions while 162 and 168 Brigades had three infantry battalions each. It was assigned the mission of containing Pakistani forces at Sialkot so that these could not create any problem on the northern flank of the 1st Armoured Division¡¯s line of advance. To achieve this aim 162 and 168 Brigade with a tank squadron each,162 Brigade on the right and 168 Brigade on the left were to carry out a limited advance into astride Sialkot Jammu road in the direction of Unche Wains-Niwe Wains-Bajragrahi areas from 2330 Hours night of 7th September onwards. The third brigade i.e. 19 Brigade was to be the reserve brigade.21 It appears that this brigade was brought particularly against the Pakistani Marala Salient which was called ¡® Dagger Salient¡¯ by the Indians. All the Pakistanis had in this dagger salient was one simple infantry battalion! The main malady with which the Indians suffered was having too much infantry and not knowing how to use it while the Pakistani problem seems to have been having too many tanks and not knowing how to use them!

Battle of Chawinda-6th to 22nd September 1965

Jassar Bridge Crisis:- At 0315 hours on the night of 6th/7th September Indian artillery shelled the Pakistani 115 Brigades positions on both sides of the Jassar Bridge.It was ironical that both the 115 Pakistani Brigade (two infantry battalions,one R & S Company and one TDU tank regiment) and the 29 Indian Brigade(three infantry battalions and one tank squadron) opposing each other in Jassar area were commanded by two extremely timid and highly nervous commanders. The task assigned to 29 Indian Brigade originally from 7 Division but now operating in an independent role directly under 11 Corps Headquarter was to capture the Pakistani enclave across river Ravi which was a potential Pakistani jump off point inside Indian territory. The Indians launched their attack at 0400 hours 6th September and by 0415 hours reached the southern end of the Jassar bridge which was a few hundred yards from the Indian border. 115 Brigade launched a counter attack using tanks and dislodged the Indians from the southern end of the bridge by 0800 hours. The Pakistani GHQ, influenced by nervousness at Headquarter 1 corps, took the situation opposite Jassar very seriously and ordered the 6 Armoured Division in dispersal in Gujranwala-Nandipur area to move to Pasrur on night 6/7 September.22 The Indian brigade commander sent exaggerated reports about Pakistani success to 11 Corps Headquarter and requested permission to withdraw. 11 Corps Headquarter instead sent their Chief Engineer Officer and another staff officer to revive the morale of 29 Infantry Brigade Commander. These two officers on arrival were able to put some spirit in the 29 Brigade and under their supervision the 29 Indian Brigade launched another attack on night 06/07 September 23. This attack was successful and the Indians recaptured the southern end of the bridge by 0800 hours 7th September 1965. In response to this development the 115 Brigade blew up a span of the Jassar bridge which was already prepared for demolition since 6th September at 0800 hours 07 September 1965. In reality the situation had stabilised now with river Ravi in between and both the brigades positioned north and south of the river. Brigadier Muzaffar was unfortunately for Pakistan Army of a different stuff. At 1130 hours on the same day i.e. 7th September without reconfirming he sent a report to Headquarter 15 Division that an enemy infantry battalion had crossed the ravi river and established a foothold on the northern side of the river 24. All this was happening at a time when Headquarter 11 Indian Corps had ordered the 29 Brigade on 8th September to leave a battalion and revert to its parent formation 7 Infantry Division¡¯s command in area Bhikiwind on the night of 8/9th September25, in response to the developments in 4 Mountain Division sector as a result of the 1st Armoured division¡¯s offensive in Khem Karan. 115 Brigades alarming report naturally caused grave apprehensions in the Pakistani High Command from 15 Division onwards till the GHQ. Headquarter 15 Division despatched 24 Brigade less one battalion opposite Chobara-Phillora alongwith one tank regiment (25 Cavalry) to 115 Brigade area (Jassar). 25 Cavalry spearheading the fire brigade sent to extinguish the exaggerated fire at Jassar reached Jassar at 2200 hours on 7th September and found out that the situation was not a fraction as serious as reported by 115 Brigade and at 0200 hours on night 7/8 September to return to his original location Pasrur which 25 Cavalry reached at first light 8th September26. Meanwhile the 6 Armoured Division which had started moving from Gujranwala to Pasrur on 6th September evening and whose leading elements had reached Pasrur by 2345 hours was ordered to return to Gujranwala by 0500 hours 7th September!27 Contrary to the porevalent thinking in Pakistan Jassar was no Indian deception but a sheer defensive action aimed at eliminating a dangerous enclave from which the Pakistanis could threaten Amritsar. It was the fog of war that made the Pakistani GHQ and 1 Corps imagine the shadow at Jassar as that of a giant ! Interestingly the Indian brigade commander at Jassar was as much afraid of the Pakistani troops opposite him as the Pakistani 1 Corps and GHQ were afraid of the Indian threat opposite Jassar. If Major Shamshad a direct participant who went to Narowal (Jassar) is to be believed then only one squadron of 25 Cavalry was sent to Jassar.28

The 26 Division Fixing Manoeuvre against Sialkot from 7th to 8th September:-- The aim of 26 Division attack against Sialkot was not to capture Sialkot but to contain the Pakistani forces in Sialkot so that they could not pose a threat to the northern flank of the main Indian attack force consisting of the 1st Armoured and 6 Mountain Division.Keeping in view the Indian superiority in this sector this was an easy to achieve objective.The Pakistani 15 Division had relatively better mobile forces in the shape of one tank regiment, one TDU tank regiment and one R & S Company but just three infantry battalions (two from 101 Brigade and one being from the divisional reserve i.e. 104 brigade) against one Indian tank regiment and eight infantry battalions. The Indian attack commenced two brigade up against the border villages of Niwe Wains, Bajragarhi etc from 2330 hours night 7/8 September. Both the brigades captured their insignificant objectives.In any case the troops opposite Sialkot were too weak to interfere with the advance of the main Indian attack. The Indians however remained obsessed with defence of Jammu and later brought a fourth brigade i.e. the 52 Mountain Brigade(three battalions) on 11th September 1965.29

The Main Indian Attack and 25 Cavalry (24 Brigade) Counter actions 0n 8th September 1965:--We have already discussed that 25 Cavalry and 24 Brigade minus one unit in defence opposite Charwa was despatched to Jassar on 7th September and that 25 Cavalry returned to Pasrur at approximately 0500 hours on 8th September. While 25 Cavalry and 24 Brigade were moving to Jassar and moving back to Pasrur the third battalion of 24 Brigade i.e. 3 FF which was holding defences opposite Maharajke-Chrawa extended as a screen for over 10,000 yards30 was overrun by the concerted attack of the 69 and 99 Mountain Brigades on the night of 7th/8th September. This news about the overrunning of 3 FF was received at 0600 hours at Pasrur by the 24 Brigade headquarter which had just reached Pasrur from Jassar at 0500 hours on 8th September. The news was shocking! Brigadier Abdul Ali Malik the 24 Brigade Commander knew little about tank warfare and had no idea of the quantum of troops opposite him. However the Commanding Officer of 25 Cavalry Lieutenant Colonel Nisar, was a capable armour officer. In adition 25 Cavalry was,to Pakistan Army¡¯s good luck, a newly raised but extremely fine tank regiment, having on its strength some very outstanding officers, not merely on paper but in terms of bravery in face of enemy and in extraordinary situations. Malik who like Nisar had no clue about the situation in his front and asked Nisar to do something.31 Thus Malik abdicated the conduct of battle to the commanding officer of a tank regiment which was under his command! The regiment was refuelling at this time having poofed up all the fuel going to Jassar (Major Shamshad, a direct participant and later referred to, states that only Charlie Squadron went to Pasrur) and coming back. Nisar immediately ordered tank squadron (B Squadron) commanded by Major Ahmad (originally from Guides Cavalry and an extremely brave leader of men) to advance in an extended order towards Charwa the reported point of enemy breakthrough!After tasking one of the squadrons to advance towards Charwa Nisar alerted the remaining part of the regiment to move towards Chawinda. At 0730 hours Nisar sent another squadron (A Squadron) towards Tharoah on receiving reports that Indian armour was seen opposite Tharoh area. At 1130 hours Nisar sent ¡®A¡¯ Squadron to area west of Gadgor.In short by 1200 hours the whole of 25 Cavalry was deployed three squadrons in line abreast opposite the Indian 1st Armoured Brigade leading the advance of the Indian 1st Armoured Division. ¡®B¡¯ squadron of 25 Cavalry came in contact with the advancing tanks of the Indian 1st Armoured Division near Gadgor.The Indian 1st Armoured Division which had commenced its advance from the bridgehead secured by the 6 Mountain Division in Charwa-Maharajke area after crossing the international border at 0600 hours on the morning of 8th September.It was advancing two regiments up;with an inter regiment gap of approximately 3500 to 4000 metres in between,each regiment one squadron up, 16 Light Cavalry supported by a Gurkha infantry battalion on the right,advancing towards Phillora 17 Poona Horse on the left advancing towards Tharoah cross roads.Both the tank regiments had a clean run during the first 15 kilometres of their advance inside Pakistan.According to the Indian armoured corps historian the Pakistan Airforce aircrafts attacked the leading Indian armour elements at about 8.40 Am. at Chobara but were unable to hit any tank. The Indian 16 Light Cavalry advancing two troops up came in contact with 25 Cavalry¡¯s tanks advancing in extended order towards Chobara without a clue that the Indian 1st Armoured Division was just a few miles away. 25 Cavalry ¡®s ¡®Bravo Squadron¡¯ commanded by Major Ahmad ,suddenly at approximately 50 to 200 metres ranges at about 0900 or 0945 hours came into contact with two leading tank troops of 16 Light Cavalry. Some of Ahmad¡¯s tanks had taken firepositions while some were in the open .The Indians were on the move. A confused firefight followed in which both sides lost tanks, Pattons burning on being hit while Centurions getting shot through both sides! Both the Indian leading tank troop leaders were killed, thus leaving the leading squadron commander of 16 Light Cavalry clueless.32 Major Ahmad of 25 Cavalry carried the day by fighting from the front, thus inspiring his men to fight till death, rather than withdraw an inch. It was during this firefight that Major Ahmad, who had already changed his tank once was also severely burnt after having personally destroyed four tanks.33 There is no doubt that it was Major Ahmad who saved the Pakistani position at Gadgor by fighting from the front and injecting in his men real steel. He was the only squadron commander in 25 Cavalry who led from the front and was the only major who proved himself equal to the crisis in 25 Cavalry! Major Shamshad one of the direct participant in that battle gave the same verdict.34 16 Light Cavalry CO tried to bring up another squadron, commanded by an Indian Muslim officer Major M.A.R Shiekh to outflank the Pakistani position in front from the the east. The space for manoeuvre was however extremely limited Poona Horse the left forward Indian unit being just 4000 metres away from the right forward unit. In the process of manoeuvring this second squdron exposed its broadsides to 25 Cavalry tanks of ¡® Alpha Squadron¡¯ losing many tanks including that of Major Shiekh who received a head injury35 and died on the spot. Finally this second squadron was held up having lost its squadron commander and unable to manoeuvre due to limited visibility and lack of space to manoeuvre. As per General Gurcharan Singh once the second squadron was held up CO 16 Light Cavalry passed ¡®exaggerated¡¯ reports to the 1 Armoured Brigade Commander who in turn ordered 16 Light Cavalry not to advance any further36. We will not go in the details of what 25 Cavalry or 16 Light Cavalry did since this in itself would require a whole book.In brief 16 Light Cavalry¡¯s advance was checked at Gadgor by 1000 hours 8th September. 17 Poona Horse which was advancing on the left towards Tharoah commenced its advance two squadrons up but soon changed to one squadron up because of the limited fields of fire and observation that made command and control, extremely difficult.It came in contact with 25 Cavalry at 0945 hours in Tharoh area and was also checked like 16 Light Cavalry. According to Gurcharan Singh some firing took place in between the tanks of 16 Light Cavalry and 17 Poona Horse37. This happened because the inter regiment gap between both the regiments was too less. ¡®C¡¯ Squadron 62 Cavalry which was tasked to provide left flank protection to the 1st Armoured Division¡¯s advance was delayed as its tanks got bogged down while inside Indian territory .When half of this squadron did finally got going and crossed the border at 1000 hours it went south towards Zafarwal by some misunderstanding after crossing the Degh Nala instead of advancing parallel and north of the Degh Nala as originally ordered!This squadron crossed the Degh Nala and reached Zafarwal in Pakistani territory absolutely unopposed and later recrossed the Degh Nala to go north once it probably realised that it was supposed to stay north of Degh Nala!Once this squadron was recrossing the Degh Nala it was engaged by an Indian artillery battery providing fire support to the 1st Armoured brigade,which naturally mistook it for Pakistani tanks seeing it approach from south of Degh Nala.In turn this squadron also opened fire on the Indian battery which they thought to be a Pakistani battery destroying several guns and vehicles!38 By 1300 hours Brigadier K.K Singh Commander 1st Armoured Brigade was a mentally defeated man.He reached the conclusion that ¡®He was held up by at least two Patton regiments and that there was no possibility of advancing direct towards Phillora without suffering unacceptable losses¡¯.He was further unnerved by reports of a ¡®raid by enemy tanks on guns and soft vehicles¡¯ (which in reality was the firing between 62 Cavalry¡¯s tanks coming recrossing Degh Nadi!)39 Commander 1 Armoured Brigade concluded that ¡®his line of communication was not secure¡¯40 and ¡®decided to adopt a defensive posture for the security of his command at 1400 hours issued orders withdrawing the brigade into a ¡®box¡¯ around Sabzpir cross roads! The 17 Poona Horse which had encountered opposition but was taking positive measures to deal with it was also withdrawn and deployed to cover the eastern flank in the area,and the 4 Hodson¡¯s Horse was also detailed to defend the southern flank41. All this was happening at a time when there was just 25 Cavalry in front of the whole 1st Indian Armoured Division! The readers may note that the Indians were not lacking in valour as cheap propaganda conducted in Pakistan after 1965 claimed but phenomenally incompetent at unit and brigade level. Their right forward unit 17 Poona Horse could have easily outflanked 25 Cavalry¡¯s ¡®Alpha Squadron¡¯. Major Shamshad a direct participant thus rightly observed in his article that ¡®There is a big gap, about six miles wide, between Hasri Nala and Degh Nala which could have provided a safe passage to 17 Poona Horse up to Pasrur. No troops were deployed to defend this area. It appears that they did try to advance but the higher headquarters held them back. I say so because I saw trackmarks of Centurions in Seowal on 19th September.¡¯ 42 It may be noted that the 43 Lorried Brigade advance on the other axis also went diasastorously, less due to enemy opposition and more due to poor as well as inefficient execution.The 43 Lorried Brigade which was supposed to commence advance at 0600 hours commenced advance five hours late at 1100 hours because its leading unit 8 Garhwal reached the start line much later than planned,and got delayed as soon as it commenced advance due to poor traffic control ! No men with landmines tied to their chests were needed in face of such phenomenally incmpetent staff and battle procedures! 43 Lorried Brigade led by 2 Lancers finally reached Sabzpir cross roads at 1530 hours where tanks of the Indian 1st Armoured Brigade opened fire on Indian Armoured Corps¡¯s 2 Lancers mistaking them for Pakistani tanks and in the process destroyed two Indian tanks including CO 2 Lancers tank!43 Thus 43 Lorried brigade also harboured at Sabzpir cross roads.Gurcharan Singh¡¯s verdict on the Indian 1st Armoured Division¡¯s performance is worth quoting and is also a tribute to 25 Cavalry, the only unit of the Pakistan Army that did on 8th September 1965 what no other unit of Pakistan Army ever did and most probably would ever do again.44 Gurcharan thus wrote; ¡®The first days battle could not have got off to a worse start. The Armoured Brigade had been blocked by two squadrons of Pattons and in the first encounter the brigade had lost more tanks than the enemy had....whole of 1 Corps had gained a few kilometres... The worst consequence of the days battle was its paralysing effect on the minds of the higher commanders. It took them another 48 hours to contemplate the next offensive move. This interval gave the Pakistanis time to move up and deploy their 6 Armoured Division with five additional armoured regiments.In fact the golden opportunity that fate had offered to the 1st Armoured division to make worthwhile gains had been irretrievably lost¡¯.45 Harbaksh Singh also accurately summed up the Indian failure; ¡®both 16 Cavalry and 17 Horse failed to determine the strength of the opposing armour and displayed little skill in outmanoeuvring it... the Brigade Commander made the unfortunate decision to withdraw 17 Horse from Tharoah for countering an alleged serious tank threat on the Left flank. This was a grave error of judgement as 4 Horse which by this time had been released to the Brigade by GOC 1 Armoured Division, could have been used to meet any flank threat posed by the enemy armour. The blunder cost us dearly.We made an advance of only four miles beyond the bridgehead when a much deeper penetration could have been achieved. The fleeting chance that could have been exploited to gain a striking success, was lost forever.... and while we were fumbling about ineffectively in a chaotic situation of our own creation, the enemy had that vital breathing space so essential for a quick rally round from the stunning impact of surprise. We courted a serious setback through faulty decision and immature handling of armour which the enemy was not slow to exploit. From now onwards,the thrust intended to keep the enemy off balance and reeling until the final blow by sheer speed of advance, turned into a slow slogging match¡ªa series of battering-ram actions¡¯.46 I have not come across any finer summing up of the Battle of Chawinda than the one done by Harbaksh Singh. I have specifically quoted it to show that 8th September was the most critical day of the otherwise long series of actions around Chawinda which dragged on till cease-fire on 22 September 1965. It was on 8th September or 0n 9th when the Indians could have easily outflanked the Pakistanis at Chawinda,had their higher armour commanders not been paralysed into a state of inertia indecision and inaction because of 25 Cavalry¡¯s memorable extended line stand in Gadgor area. Major Shamshad states that ¡®Instead of wasting two days in planning, If Poona Horse had advanced from Dugri to Shehzada and captured Pasroor on 9th we would have been in serious trouble.Alternatively, 2 Royal Lancers could have moved unopposed from Bhagowal to Badiana and cut Sialkot-Pasrur Road¡¯.47 After 9th September when the Pakistani 6 Armoured Division and later the 1st Armoured Division beefed up Pakistani strength it was no longer a question of valour or superior generalship but simple,unimaginative frontal battle with both sides having equal number of tanks.Keeping this background in mind we will not waste much stationery on the battles around Chawinda after 9th September.48 These battles like Phillora etc are good motivational topics for indoctrinating the other ranks but little else. The real issue was decided on 8th September 1965 and not by Tikka Khan 49 etc but by Nisar and his officers and men around Gadgor!

Operational Situation on 9th and 10th September:-- The Indians had not suffered a physical defeat on 8th September.It was their higher command that was afflicted by paralysis and in this state they ¡®exaggerated¡¯ dimensions of the force in front of them and imagined something much larger than one battered regiment in front of them! On 9th September they had two absolutely fresh regiments (4 Horse and 2 Lancers), one reasonably fresh regiment (62 Cavalry), and two regiments with relatively weaker tank strength against 25 Cavalry whose tank strength was down to two tank squadrons.50 In infantry they were vastly superior having twelve battalions against one. Had they possessed a resolute general nothing could have stopped them, not even Tikka Khan projected by Shaukat as ¡®one ¡®known for his firmness and endurance¡¯.51 But their brigade divisional and corps headquarters was paralysed due to the trauma of Gadgor! In words of the Indian armoured corps historian on 9th and 10th September ¡®The 1st Armoured Brigade with its three Centurion regiments and its motor battalion remained ¡®boxed¡¯ in its defensive position during these two days¡¯.52 25 Cavalry found the Indian Operation Order regarding ¡®Operation Nepal¡¯ (the 1 Corps Offensive) in one of the abandoned/hit tank of 16 Light Cavalry and came to know that the formations opposite them were the Indian 1st Armoured Division, 6 Mountain Division and 14 Division and that these were functioning as part of 1 Indian Corps.53 This operation order enabled the Pakistani High Command to understand the entire Indian plan aimed at destruction of the 6 Armoured Division and the fact that Chawinda was on the axis of the main Indian line of advance. The 6 Armoured Division whose headquarters were located at Bhalowali east of MRL 54 was alerted in the evening of 8th September and assigned the mission ¡®be prepared to destroy enemy penetration in area east of MRL canal, on further orders¡¯.Shaukat Riza¡¯s account of what followed on 8th and 9th September is not reliable and therefore extremely vague. No sane reader can make head or tail of what Shaukat assisted by his team of GHQ¡¯s so called cream officer material was trying to say about 6 Armoured Divisions actions in the aftermath of the Indian attack. In all probability Shaukat was trying to put a smokescreen on the Pakistani High Command which was as unnerved as the Ist Indian Armoured Brigade and Division! Brigadier Amjad Chaudhry who did not become a general and therefore did not belong to the trade union of Pakistani generals had a better explanations per Brigadier Amjad Chaudhry ¡®the presence of the Indian 1st Armoured Division was discovered from the copy of the operation order found in an Indian tank which had been knocked out in the first encounter. This information was immediately transmitted to GHQ. The GHQ took 48 hours to decide upon their next move. Our operational plans had perhaps not taken into consideration all the options open to the aggressor¡¯.55 GOC 1st Armoured Division issued the following ¡® be prepared¡¯ contingency orders at 2200 hours 8th September 1965:-- (1) Guides Cavalry to move to Badiana extending northwest towards Sialkot. (2) 11 Cavalry to move to Pasrur to deal with any outflanking enemy move towards MRL from east of Degh Nala.(11 Cavalry at this stage was moving from Chhamb back to 6 Armoured Division¡¯s command and reached Pasrur on night 9/10 September) .56 (3) 22 Cavalry to stay in concentration area and send its recce troop to screen area north of Badiana (4) 9 FF (Motorised Infantry) to deploy in area Phillaura-Degh Nala with at least one platoon at Zafarwal. 57 It may be noted that Shaukat did not describe what 6 Armoured Division actually do on 9th and 10th September!Nor did Shaukat state the precise location of 6 Armoured Division between 7th and 9th September. The period 9th and 10th September can be very exactly described by a Clausewitzian term ¡®SUSPENSION OF ACTION¡¯ which has been defined by Clausewitz as a situation when ¡®Action in war temporarily stops for a variable duration due to a variety of reasons which may be broadly classified into four distinct categories; ie; firstly¡ªwant of resolution in the military commander; secondly¡ªimperfect human perception;thirdly¡ªinherent strength of defence and fourthly¡ªimperfect knowledge of the situation.58

We have already seen that the Indians were immobilised due to primarily the first factor identified by Clausewitz.During this period the various units of 6 Armoured Division were slowly arriving in general area Chawinda-Badiana-Pasrur and various advisors were thrust upon GOC 6 Armoured Division like Brigadier Riaz ul Karim who was made deputy GOC 6 Armoured Division and Major General Sahibzada Yaqub Ali Khan who was appointed Deputy Corps Commander 1 Corps59 (probably keeping in view the fact that General Bakhtiar Rana however reliable and effective in the drill square type requirements of the Ayubian army, would not be able to understand the subtleties of armoured warfare!!!!). It appears that the GHQ realised the need to intellectually improve the performance of the eminent corps headquarter after seeing its deplorable performance during the Jassar Bridge panic when the corps headquarters was paralysed by inertia ! Brigadier Riazul Karim narrates an interesting incident about this advisor business. Oonce the war started Riaz volunteered for command of troops but was told by the VCO type Chief of General Staff Sher Bahadur ¡®not to be unnecessarily excited as we had already got good commanders with the armoured formations¡¯. Riaz narrates that ¡® as soon as news of failure of 1st Armoured Divison¡¯s failure was confirmed, I was suddenly called up by General Musa who said that I should go immediately to join 6 Armoured Division and guide the GOC on armoured operations¡¯. The role of the corps commander was nominal. Riaz states that ¡® Another senior armour officer was detailed by the GHQ to join corps headquarter....the general officer was reported to be discussing on telephone plans and events directly with C in C over the head of the corps commander and furthermore, also passing GHQ orders regarding even minor armour operations direct to GOC 6 Armoured Division ¡®. There were too many cooks trying to prepare the Pakistani broth! Thus in words of Riaz ¡®Whenever I advised the GOC on any matter,he told me that he had already received orders from C in C/CGS/DMO to do something else.My GOC was therefore usually in a flat spin.Fortunately however, there,was never any divisional battle as such¡¯.60

During this period the Guides Cavalry was stationed in general area Bhureshah-Alhar while 11 Cavalry reached Pasrur on night 9/10 September. 22 Cavalry was in general area Badiana and 25 Cavalry alongwith 24 Brigade was holding general area Gadgor-Phillora and not in contact with the Indians who as we discussed earlier had gone temporarily on the defensive in box formation from the afternoon of 8th September. The 6th Armoured Division was not given any operational responsibility on 9th September and at this stage 24 Brigade and 25 Cavalry were still functioning under command 15 Division. Finally on the night of 9/10 September the much needed change in area of responsibility was made by Headquarter 1 Corps assigning the area expected to be soon threatened by the 1st Indian Armoured Division;ie area Charwa-Phillaurah-Chawinda-Chobara-Badiana-Pasrur; to the 6 Armoured Division;alongwith 24 Brigade and 25 Cavalry.61 At this stage GOC 6 Armoured Division made a plan to contain the Indian main attack which was based on the rationale that either the Indians would attack on axis Phillora-Chawinda-Pasrur-Daska or on axis Bhagowal-Badiana and west of Sialkot towards general area Ugoke-Umman with the aim of isolating Sialkot.Based on this assumption about enemy intentions Major General Abrar issued the following orders:-- (1) Phillora-Gadgor to be continued to be held by 24 Brigade-25 Cavalry battlegroup (2) Chawinda to be prepared/earmarked as alternative position for 24 Brigade or as depth position for reinforcements (3) Badiana to be covered by one tank regiment (4) Zafarwal to be thinly masked by elements of the R & S Battalion (13 FF) (5) Pasrur to be held by 14 Para Brigade which was previously Corps Reserve (5) Artillery Brigade 4 Corps to support 6 Armoured Division Operation.62 At 0900 hours on 10th September Shaukat Riza claims that the Indians attacked 25 Cavalry opposite Gadgor and lost seven tanks 63, but the Indians did not mention any such attack! GOC 6 Armoured Division was called to 1 Corps Headquarter at 0900 hours on 10th September and asked to make the following amendments to his plan on the recommendations of Major General Yaqub in the capacity of Deputy Corps Commander:-- (1) Zafarwal to be held by 14 Para Brigade with one TDU tank squadron from 33 TDU and one company R & S under command (2) 11 Cavalry and 9 FF to hold Phillauarah (3) Guides Cavalry and 14 FF to hold Badiana area (4) 22 Cavalry in area track junction (5) Pasrur to be held by 24 Brigade and 25 Cavalry.64 In the afternoon on the same day Yaqub arrived in 6 Armoured Division Headquarter to ensure implementation of his amendments in Abrar¡¯s plan, with particular emphasis on 11 Cavalry relieving 24 Brigade and 25 Cavalry at Gadgor.This decision was criticised by both Shaukat Riza and General K.M Arif who was grade two operations staff officer in 6 Armoured Divisional Headquarter during the war.65

Battle of Phillora-- 11th September 1965:- The Indian 1 Corps/1 Armoured Division finally gathered greater resolution and recommenced their advance on 11th September. It may be noted that by now two more infantry brigades i.e. 58 and 116 Brigades (Originally on the ORBAT of 14 Division) moving up from Pathankot had joined the Indian attack force.116 Brigade minus one battalion joined 14 Division for operations opposite general area Zafarwal while 35 Brigade and one battalion of 116 Brigade were placed under command 1st Armoured Division.58 Brigade was placed under command 6 Mountain Division.66 The Indian plan of attack was based on a preliminary deception plan to impress upon the Pakistanis that the main Indian attack was coming from the direction of Sabzpir, while the 1st Armoured Brigade was to mount an attack originating from Rurki Kalan67. Details of this plan were as following:-- (1) 43 Lorried Brigade (two battalions) to capture area Rurki Kalan by first light 11 September .In the next phase it was assigned the be prepared task of assisting 1 Armoured Brigade in reducing Phillora (2) 1 Armoured Brigade (three tank regiments) to break out at first light 11 September with two regiments i.e. 4 Horse and 17 Poona Horse encircling Phillora from both flanks by a pincer movement (17 Poona Horse isolating Phillora from the west and 4 Horse from the east) while the third regiment 16 Light Cavalry was to advance towards road junction area near Khakan wali on Phillora-Sialkot road with the aim of intercepting any Pakistani armour from interfering with the main armour attack against Phillora.(3) 62 Cavalry and one infantry battalion functioning as a separate battlegroup directly under command 1st Armoured Division were to function as right flank protection force against any threat from Sialkot. The whole brunt of the Indian tank attack was directed against 11 Cavalry and 9 FF who had just relieved 25 Cavalry and 24 Brigade during the night of 10/11 September and had had no opportunity to orientate themselves with the terrain during day time. The assault on Rurki Kalan commenced at 0600 hours and Rurki Kalan was captured by 0640 hours. The main tank battles took place on line Libbe-Nathupur-Saboke and 11 Cavalry with two tank squadrons of Pattons and one of obsolete Tank destroyers and not knowing the area ,was no match to the overwhelming Indian superiority68 of six squadrons of Centurions with intimate infantry support of two battalions. 6 Armoured Division ordered Guides Cavalry and 14 FF to mount an attack from Bhagowal-Bhureshah area against the right flank of the Indians aimed at area Libbe-Chahr at 1130 hours on 11th September. The aim of this attack was to relieve pressure on 11 Cavalry. This Guides had a severe firefight with 16 Light Cavalry losing many tanks as well as destroying some enemy tanks but was unable to make any impression and the main Indian attack against 11 Cavalry holding Phillora proceeded smoothly .Phillora was captured by the Indians on 1530 hours on 11th September. I1 Cavalry fought well and lost so many tanks that from 11th September onwards it ceased to function as a complete tank regiment. The Indians fought well but in the overall strategic context capture of Phillora was of little consequence. Had the Indians shown similar resolution and a little more coup d oeil and modified their plans at the brigade and divisional level on the 8th of September, by 11th September they would have been leisurely holding the east bank of MRL. Gurcharan Singh accurately described the situation from 11 September onwards as one in which; ¡®there was little hope of a battle of manoeuvre any longer¡¯.69 The Pakistani position on the night of 11/12 September was serious but luckily Pakistan possessed an extremely resolute man in the person of Major General Abrar Hussain (an MBE of Second World War). Abrar remained calm and unperturbed and luckily the Indian higher commanders opposite him failed to understand that by remaining inactive on 11 th and 12th September they were losing their last opportunity to inflict a decisive defeat on Pakistan at a time when fresh tank regiments from the 1st Pakistani Armoured Division had not yet reinforced 6 Armoured Division.

Operational Situation 12th and 13 September:-- Swiftness in decision making was certainly not the cardinal command attribute of personality of higher commanders in both Indian and Pakistan Armies!After capturing Phillora the Indian higher headquarters again wasted 48 hours in planning their next move.The Indian troops at this stage were motivated and they had some excellent commanders at regiment and squadron level like Colonel Tarapur who was as brave as any Pakistani. Subconsciously higher commanders on both sides were still behaving like platoon commanders and company commanders;the primary role of Indians in the British Indian Army; rather than brigade divisional or corps commanders.It never occurred to them that Phillora in itself was of little military value and every day that they were wasting was enabling the Pakistanis to reinforce their defence opposite Phillora.GOC 6 Armoured Division Major General Abrar Hussain now firmly resolved to make the final stand at Chawinda.Abrar made the following readjustments on 12th September:- (1) Remnants of 11 Cavalry to collect south of Chawinda (2) 25 Cavalry to move forward to Chawinda (3) 14 FF to move to Chawinda (4) 24 Brigade to move to Chawinda (5) 14 Para Brigade to move to Zafarwal from Pasrur.70 Luckily for Pakistan the Indians did nothing like advancing on 12th as well as 13th September! During this Godsend period of much needed rest and recuperation the 3rd Armoured Brigade (one tank regiment and one self propelled artillery regiment) arrived at Sambrial near Chawinda at 1500 hours on 12th September and was designated as 1 Corps reserve.71 Its tank regiment 19 Lancers was absolutely fresh as far as having participated in actual combat was concerned and was equipped with brand new Pattons.In afternoon 12 September as per Gurcharan Singh the Indians captured Zafarwal employing a tank squadron of 2 Lancers which was withdrawn back across Degh Nala by 116 Brigade the same day. Harbaksh Singh however states that this tank squadron ¡® made no attempt to push forward to Zafarwal and having idled away the rest of the day returned to Kangre¡¯.72 Once the Indians tried to recapture Zafarwal on 13th September it was already strongly held by six tank troops,one R & S Platoon and five infantry companies.What had happened was that on 12th September after getting the correct report from army aviation¡¯s air observer at 1500 hours (which Shaukat Riza has naively dismissed as questionable and doubtful ) 6 Armoured Division had directed 14 Para Brigade to send an infantry battalion and tank squadron (ex 22 Cavalry) to Zafarwal. Brigadier Niazi (of East Pakistan fame) commanding 14 Para Brigade sent a report later that day that Zafarwal was occupied by Indians and requested the GOCs permission to recapture it.We have already seen that Zafarwal was not in enemy occupation and this report of Commander 14 Para Brigade was not correct.In any case even if the Indians occupied it for a short duration as Gurcharan claims but Harbaksh Singh (a relatively more reliable authority denies) it was not occupied by the Indians when according to Shaukat Riza 14 Para Brigade (employing one infantry battalion less one company-4 FF) secured it by 0100 hours night 12/13 September.73 At 0600 hours 13 September i.e. five hours after 4 FF (14 Para Brigade) had occupied Zafarwal (without any enemy holding it) a squadron of 22 Cavalry (with one infantry company of 4 FF tank mounted) which had been ordered at 1335 hours on 12 September from Pasrur also reached Zafarwal. Shaukat Riza has repeated another fa