unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

The Holiday Season

Azra Rashid December 19, 2007

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4

#1 Posted by bjkumar on December 19, 2007 10:26:54 am
Most “miracles” do not bear scientific scrutiny well, which is why over such a long time, organized religions have tried to downplay education in general and education that stimulates questioning minds, in particular. Organized religions derive their strength from the weight of the status quo and from the constantly replenishing and vastly higher number of minds that would always take the more convenient route of following what is prescribed rather than question it and experiment with the new.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by Inquirer on December 19, 2007 1:46:53 pm
Azra: What is your point? Why do you restrict to monotheistic religions? All religions demand an unquestioning faith assured by self-sacrifice.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by ejazharoon on December 19, 2007 9:23:37 pm
My parents and teachers taught me what to believe when I was a child, I questioned it when I was a young man, I don't believe those things now that I'm close to 40, maybe in a few years as my health goes downhill I'll "get religion" again. What good is religion unless it changes (for the better) the way I behave?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by nkg on December 19, 2007 9:36:48 pm
I am not expert in Budhdhism. But it does not depend upon miracle or word of God. They don't kill animal to please god (I am not sure what kind of God needs animal life to be pleased).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by laddu on December 20, 2007 4:48:48 am
Re: # 4

"They don't kill animal to please god (I am not sure what kind of God needs animal life to be pleased)..."

What about the god that needs human life (of mushriques, kafirs and mujahideens) to be pleased....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by laddu on December 20, 2007 4:50:13 am
Also, Buddhism is nastika and does not assert the existence and interference of a God..........
questions of god are avayaktanis........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by laddu on December 20, 2007 4:52:50 am
"As the story goes, God appeared in a dream to Ibrahim and told him to sacrifice his son Isma'il. Ibrahim and Isma'il set off to Mina for the sacrifice. Mother tells the boy that as the Prophet went with his only child, the devil attempted to persuade Ibrahim to disobey God and not to sacrifice his beloved son. But Ibrahim stayed true to God, and drove the devil away. As Ibrahim prepared to kill his son God stopped him and gave him a sheep to sacrifice instead."

I think the story was that Abrahim actually killed his son........and the son was made alive again........so a father killing his son as sacrifice for the blood thirsty God of Abrahim.......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by philosopher on December 20, 2007 7:54:06 am
Eid ul adha is the commemoration of the sacrifice of the Prophet Ibrahim(pbuh). This sacrifice shows a very significant dimension of religious epistemology. Not only does it explodes the idea of the 'ethical interpretation of religion' it also shows that religion itself is not a 'moral philosophy' .On the other hand moralities are dependent on the basic tenets of religion. According to religious epistemology ,God is the source of all moralities. Moralities are there only to play a role of guidance for the person involved in the religious activity. According to the glorious Quran development of perception plays a very important role in intellectual and spirtual development of a man. Religious moralities show you the path in the complexity and illusion of appearance to comprehend the reality beyond that. A religious person has always in veiw that commitment to those guidance and will of God. He reaches to the point where he starts comprehending the hitherto unreaveled meaning of the religious language which no lexicographical meaning could possibly reveal. Prophet Ibrahim(pbuh) reamaind and patient and commited despite his natural love for his son. It shows that real 'momin' has got to see everything with perspective of the will of God. There is a saying of the Holy prophet muhammed(pbuh) '' be ware of the wisdom of the man of faith because he sees with the light of Allah''. At that point you remain patient and commited to the guidance. The sheep that was sent by God simbolizes the ''reality'' which is beyond the illusion of appearance. This shows that the 'Truth' can be found only by following the commands of the God. People who interpret religion and scripture suited to their ''oon''(a generic term for kanjroon, madroon ,secularoon and liberaloon....courtsy echoboom) inclinations are the worst of the losers and they are decieved by the illusion of the appearance.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by pmishra2 on December 20, 2007 8:16:52 am
[quote]
Not only does it explodes the idea of the 'ethical interpretation of religion' it also shows that religion itself is not a 'moral philosophy' .
[\quote]

Well, glad we got that out of the way. Most religions are power-based cults and have little to do with "moral philosophy". The rest of "philosophers" bakwaas is a complicated way of saying - no matter, this god gibberish still makes sense somehow.

Abraham was a particularly disgusting individual, an intemperate fanatic and all-around hater, its no surprise that cults that celebrate him have been amongst the most violent throughout history.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by philosopher on December 20, 2007 8:43:34 am
Re: # 9 piss mishra

I have been absent from chowk for some time aur tum jaisaon ko aapni auqaat bhool gai? kis nay kholi hai tum logon ki muhaar? Anyhow... i am encouraged by your enraged response. i am back beta... FASTEN YOUR SEAT BELTS..all you kanjroon..madroons...secularoon, hamidoon, hindooon and arjuoon on chowk.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by Kamath on December 20, 2007 9:02:47 am
Re: # 9
Mishra: Do you think Abraham possessed a flowing beard which became fashionable to his followers ? Or is it because there were no barbers in the desert?
Kanmath
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by tahmed32 on December 20, 2007 9:42:34 am
Party not Piety is what is behind these holidays

Thus, e.g. christmas carried over from pre-christian times - and was associated basically the day when the poor in London (e.g.) would be let in (even if unwillingly) in rich men's homes to party and booze till the next day.

Puritans (under Cromwell) banned christmas (anything that made people happy being considered sinful), and it was allowed as a holiday only after the puritans lost power on popular demands by the new king. the puritans in the US banned it too.

same thing for hannukah (jewish imitation of christmas) and kwanza (black imitation of christmas) and eid (muslim excuse to kill and eat bezabaan animals calling this gluttony a "sacrifice")!!

Hypocrisy - they name is religious customs!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by Regard on December 20, 2007 9:58:51 am
Please also note the abusive language which passes for 'philosophers' language in certain religions.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by laddu on December 20, 2007 10:18:55 am
Re: # 13

"According to religious epistemology ,God is the source of all moralities."

LOL........Sorry I would give you a zero in your epistemology paper.........what a joke....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by laykinbilkul on December 20, 2007 1:10:43 pm
Two guys standed on a desert island.. will soon develop a system of co-existence and morals...god couldn't do that if he tried.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by Eklavya on December 20, 2007 5:43:26 pm
philo, welcome back. Impeccably put. At least, forces us to confront the fact that nothing like universal morality exists.

Kaal
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4

Interact Index

    #53 pmishra2
    #52 masadi
    #51 masadi
    #50 Regard
    #49 einsteinwallah
    #48 tahir
    #47 nasah
    #46 tahir
    #45 nasah
    #44 nasah
    #43 Regard
    #42 masadi
    #41 pmishra2
    #40 jang
    #39 tahmed32
    #38 tahmed32
    #37 SR
    #36 masadi
    #35 masadi
    #34 masadi
    #33 laddu
    #32 sattar2
    #31 mohar11
    #30 mohar11
    #29 tahmed32
    #28 laddu
    #27 laddu
    #26 bjkumar
    #25 tahir
    #24 tahmed32
    #23 tahmed32
    #22 SR
    #21 Tigram
    #20 Tigram
    #19 smellthecoffee
    #18 masadi
    #17 laddu
    #16 Eklavya
    #15 laykinbilkul
    #14 laddu
    #13 Regard
    #12 tahmed32
    #11 Kamath
    #10 philosopher
    #9 pmishra2
    #8 philosopher
    #7 laddu
    #6 laddu
    #5 laddu
    #4 nkg
    #3 ejazharoon
    #2 Inquirer
    #1 bjkumar

Latest Interacts

  • quin: I don't know why... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: I wrote 'love' in... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: Tahir, I apologise for calling... Translation of a (Love)
  • chaltahai: masadi, how would you... Translation of a (Love)
  • mullah_toofani: Masadi baitay, You seem like... Translation of a (Love)
  • masadi: g'night... Translation of a (Love)
  • masadi: In #22 "facing" not... Translation of a (Love)
  • masadi: Give a free reign... Translation of a (Love)

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Dhokha and Being a Muslim in India
  • Why is Karachi Turning Into a Sell-Out?
  • Government Wins Manmohan Singh Loses
  • Time for Musharraf to Quit
  • Fields Of Joy
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Chowk Tales II: Conversations
  • Tania
  • A Day with an Orthodox Rabbi
  • Intolerance in Official Practice
  • Max Muller’s Ghost

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited