Dost Mittar January 24, 2008
#33 Posted by mohar11 on February 1, 2008 6:54:48 am
Re: # 19 dm
[... Why must Hindus insist upon theirs being A Religion?...]
Well, you are the one who wrote the article making the comparison and hair-splitting distinction!!!... :)
For most hindus religion, faith, dharma - it's the same thing... .it has been there among humans for ages, in one form or the other... the concept of god and religion is NOT abrahamic, it's universal...
You are basically creating a strawman and stumping on it...
[... Why must Hindus insist upon theirs being A Religion?...]
Well, you are the one who wrote the article making the comparison and hair-splitting distinction!!!... :)
For most hindus religion, faith, dharma - it's the same thing... .it has been there among humans for ages, in one form or the other... the concept of god and religion is NOT abrahamic, it's universal...
You are basically creating a strawman and stumping on it...
#34 Posted by Eklavya on February 1, 2008 6:55:15 am
Am not qualified to comment much here, but DM ji, laddu raises a rather important point. The resolution of that apparently complex issue is simplicity itself, if as always, we go to the basics of all Indian thought (Hinduism or not, one couldn't care less). And that Indian point has been articulated, amazingly, by Faruk!
Laddu, the anubhava that creates Indian 'cetitude' is a reflection of our own inherent/inner godhood, or to put it in terms of semitic faiths - each person's inalienable right to be his or her own 'Prophet' or son or daughter of "God."
That realization - what Indians have for ages called atma gyam (or even brahma gyan) creates 'certitude,' without reading any books. Books become another, temporary, reflection of certitude of some people at certain time and place.
--------------
khurram, you should see the bitterness with which many 'fundamentalist' christians/scholars accuse these 'liberals' or 'new agers' of being Hindus and pagans. Of course, the liberals or new agers don't accept that, and that is perfectly ok for "Hindus" for whom labels tend to be meaningless (which is a big problem in political terms)....
---------------
laddu, tragically, Islamic sufis and Hindus go to dargahs for totally different reasons. For that reason alone, Hindus should totally stop patronizing any of these places. That must be a political move, not a religious one.
-------------------
Anyways, would rather read and learn from others here. Thanks for the opportunity, DM ji.
Laddu, the anubhava that creates Indian 'cetitude' is a reflection of our own inherent/inner godhood, or to put it in terms of semitic faiths - each person's inalienable right to be his or her own 'Prophet' or son or daughter of "God."
That realization - what Indians have for ages called atma gyam (or even brahma gyan) creates 'certitude,' without reading any books. Books become another, temporary, reflection of certitude of some people at certain time and place.
--------------
khurram, you should see the bitterness with which many 'fundamentalist' christians/scholars accuse these 'liberals' or 'new agers' of being Hindus and pagans. Of course, the liberals or new agers don't accept that, and that is perfectly ok for "Hindus" for whom labels tend to be meaningless (which is a big problem in political terms)....
---------------
laddu, tragically, Islamic sufis and Hindus go to dargahs for totally different reasons. For that reason alone, Hindus should totally stop patronizing any of these places. That must be a political move, not a religious one.
-------------------
Anyways, would rather read and learn from others here. Thanks for the opportunity, DM ji.
#35 Posted by laddu on February 1, 2008 6:55:38 am
Re: # 27
"...the Hindu deities do occupy scenic places at hilltops!.."
See you try to mock my sacred places...yes indeed divinity descends on the hill tops .....you actually have only a bookish understanding of hindu way of life............
"...the Hindu deities do occupy scenic places at hilltops!.."
See you try to mock my sacred places...yes indeed divinity descends on the hill tops .....you actually have only a bookish understanding of hindu way of life............
#36 Posted by allah on February 1, 2008 6:59:06 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#37 Posted by Eklavya on February 1, 2008 7:00:07 am
lol, mohar, I refer to semitic religions and the rest of our deligions, so we can differentiate between things that only look the same but are not the same at all.
Just as we don't have religion, semiticists don't have dharma (although sufis might desecend upon us again to protest). What's more, it's hard for each side to see the possiblity or the wisdom of the other, without being accused of 'selling out' and destroying the 'essence.'
Just as we don't have religion, semiticists don't have dharma (although sufis might desecend upon us again to protest). What's more, it's hard for each side to see the possiblity or the wisdom of the other, without being accused of 'selling out' and destroying the 'essence.'
#38 Posted by laddu on February 1, 2008 7:02:04 am
Re: # 34
"Laddu, the anubhava that creates Indian 'cetitude' is a reflection of our own inherent/inner godhood, or to put it in terms of semitic faiths - each person's inalienable right to be his or her own 'Prophet' or son or daughter of "God."
That realization - what Indians have for ages called atma gyam (or even brahma gyan) creates 'certitude,' without reading any books. Books become another, temporary, reflection of certitude of some people at certain time and place."
well said.!!!
"Laddu, the anubhava that creates Indian 'cetitude' is a reflection of our own inherent/inner godhood, or to put it in terms of semitic faiths - each person's inalienable right to be his or her own 'Prophet' or son or daughter of "God."
That realization - what Indians have for ages called atma gyam (or even brahma gyan) creates 'certitude,' without reading any books. Books become another, temporary, reflection of certitude of some people at certain time and place."
well said.!!!
#39 Posted by hamidm2 on February 1, 2008 7:05:24 am
dost,
....can you recommend a book on hindooism - something like "hindooism for idiots" which can explain my grandpa's faith to me ..........
....... unlike islam which is a simple religion for simpletons, hindooism seems to be a complex religion for thinking folks (arjun being the exception) ...... at first reading it is obvious that islam and other abrahamic faiths were thought up by uneducated and ignorant sheep-herders, wheras hindooism is the product of brainy intellectuals over many centuries ...... maybe that is why christianity and islam appeals to stupid people - you accept jesus christ as the son of god and you get a ticket to heaven; you kill an infidel and you get to cavort with seventy virgins in heaven ......... simple and easy to understand ! ....... who has the time to figure out the process of reincarnation and all that other 'heavy' stuff .........
........why can't i become a hindoo by simply saying, " there is no god but ishwar and ram is his prophet" ?
#40 Posted by Dash_Dot on February 1, 2008 7:06:26 am
Re: # 25 and #24
why are you being so cruel to yourself? self-immolation is a crime slyder, and worse is a sin far greater than coveting someone else arse....
Anyway enjoy what allah said he would give you in #36
why are you being so cruel to yourself? self-immolation is a crime slyder, and worse is a sin far greater than coveting someone else arse....
Anyway enjoy what allah said he would give you in #36
#41 Posted by laddu on February 1, 2008 7:08:04 am
"laddu, tragically, Islamic sufis and Hindus go to dargahs for totally different reasons. For that reason alone, Hindus should totally stop patronizing any of these places. That must be a political move, not a religious one."
why should hindus stop going to dargahs? sufis are considered to be outside traditional Islam indulging in kufr and bidda. We consider sufis to be part of the sadhu parampara
why should hindus stop going to dargahs? sufis are considered to be outside traditional Islam indulging in kufr and bidda. We consider sufis to be part of the sadhu parampara
#42 Posted by shishapa on February 1, 2008 7:11:42 am
Re: # 39
"appeals to stupid people"
Are you saying pitamah Gopinath was stupid?
Is that why you guys deny your hinju past
and go all the way to Bagdad or Basara
or somewhere there?
"appeals to stupid people"
Are you saying pitamah Gopinath was stupid?
Is that why you guys deny your hinju past
and go all the way to Bagdad or Basara
or somewhere there?
#43 Posted by Eklavya on February 1, 2008 7:14:05 am
laddu bhai, unfortunately, that is a suicidal path for Hinduism, but for reaching that conclusion we need to figure out what sufism exactly is. If that is ok with you, let's leave that for another time.
For now, all I would submit is, sufims is NOT hinduism, it has nothing to do with Hinduism. It is not Islam either, not by a long shot, but merely one of the many tools towards the larger unit/unity of Islam.
That is perfectly fine and respectable, but it is just different. Probably that is not convincing enough, for which, I apologize.
For now, all I would submit is, sufims is NOT hinduism, it has nothing to do with Hinduism. It is not Islam either, not by a long shot, but merely one of the many tools towards the larger unit/unity of Islam.
That is perfectly fine and respectable, but it is just different. Probably that is not convincing enough, for which, I apologize.
#44 Posted by mohar11 on February 1, 2008 7:20:14 am
Re: # 37kaal
dude - it's the same thing - religion, dharma, faith... you and DM - you guys just raising strawmen out of nowhere and then stomping on it and creating a big hoopla about nothing...
I am not sure what's the reason for this hair-spliting excercise, this urge to define and re-define ancient concepts... you guys have studied abrahmic faiths and may be got too "close" to it... you guys are getting too narrow and one-dimensional in your thinking... :)
Vishnu has a thousand names and 10 different manifestations, but He is One... religion, faith, dharma - it may be a dozen different words, it's the same thing...
Come on - do i really have to teach you the basics?
dude - it's the same thing - religion, dharma, faith... you and DM - you guys just raising strawmen out of nowhere and then stomping on it and creating a big hoopla about nothing...
I am not sure what's the reason for this hair-spliting excercise, this urge to define and re-define ancient concepts... you guys have studied abrahmic faiths and may be got too "close" to it... you guys are getting too narrow and one-dimensional in your thinking... :)
Vishnu has a thousand names and 10 different manifestations, but He is One... religion, faith, dharma - it may be a dozen different words, it's the same thing...
Come on - do i really have to teach you the basics?
#45 Posted by Eklavya on February 1, 2008 7:26:24 am
LOL, you may be right, after all, mohar bhai. Still, for the sake of peace and preservation of life, I would advise my Hindu friends to not want to intall a statue of Vishnu in any mosque anytime soon, even if it is a mosque headed by Indian "sufis". :)
#46 Posted by laddu on February 1, 2008 7:28:26 am
Re: # 43
Eklavya Bhai Saheb,
Sufism's summum bonnum is "Fanaa" which is like ascetic goal of "Samadhi" - so it is very much part of hindu ascetic orders!!!
Eklavya Bhai Saheb,
Sufism's summum bonnum is "Fanaa" which is like ascetic goal of "Samadhi" - so it is very much part of hindu ascetic orders!!!
#47 Posted by laddu on February 1, 2008 7:31:24 am
Re: # 45
Eklaya ji,
I think you got it all wrong..........you would probably NOT find a sufi heading a mosque!!
And there is already a Vishnu in Mashhad Masjid in Iran.
Eklaya ji,
I think you got it all wrong..........you would probably NOT find a sufi heading a mosque!!
And there is already a Vishnu in Mashhad Masjid in Iran.
#48 Posted by khurram on February 1, 2008 7:31:29 am
Eklayva,
All pagans are not hindus. Hindus have a connection to a body of Indian thought - no matter how vaguely defined. This is missing from DM's definition in the last paragraph.
All pagans are not hindus. Hindus have a connection to a body of Indian thought - no matter how vaguely defined. This is missing from DM's definition in the last paragraph.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- _arjun30: AoA...pakistan banega zimbabwe.. Inflation at... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- _arjun30: Compensation? They should get... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- Cobra: If India gives Kashmir... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- hamidm2: Re: # 96 arjun, ... what... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- _arjun30: HAHAHA..typical hamidm type paki..all... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- akcheema: Re: # 32; madani... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
- _arjun30: #91 Posted by... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- _arjun30: liberate this, pakis... India blocks... ‘Dustbin of history’ or








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content