Pervez Hoodbhoy January 27, 2008
#113 Posted by laddu on January 30, 2008 10:40:17 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#114 Posted by laddu on January 30, 2008 10:43:48 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#115 Posted by tahir on January 30, 2008 11:01:50 pm
Re: # 111
I believe Mr. Laddu, you directed this at me? Have you ever heard of contentment, that inner peace of not being able to own EVERYTHING? I don't mean asceticism or passive sufism which God abhors!
But then, materialism wipes out whatever little humanity one has by raising one's selfish standards while wiping out the poor and the voiceless. Do you live in America; I hope not!
As for: "When the Prophet’s (pbuh) wife put a cushion in his bed he got upset. He consciously lowered his standard of living."
You've added your own views to some historic report. Please quote the original source and I'll get back to you.
Islam polishes one's spirit, increases self-esteem and dignity, and helps everyone attain that too! If that is not happening around you, the fault does not lie in the system but in those individuals.
Peace.
I believe Mr. Laddu, you directed this at me? Have you ever heard of contentment, that inner peace of not being able to own EVERYTHING? I don't mean asceticism or passive sufism which God abhors!
But then, materialism wipes out whatever little humanity one has by raising one's selfish standards while wiping out the poor and the voiceless. Do you live in America; I hope not!
As for: "When the Prophet’s (pbuh) wife put a cushion in his bed he got upset. He consciously lowered his standard of living."
You've added your own views to some historic report. Please quote the original source and I'll get back to you.
Islam polishes one's spirit, increases self-esteem and dignity, and helps everyone attain that too! If that is not happening around you, the fault does not lie in the system but in those individuals.
Peace.
#116 Posted by tahir on January 30, 2008 11:14:18 pm
Re: # 113
Mr. Laddu,
Allow me to thank you for addressing me with kindness, but also allow me to say something more.
You said:
This sunnat nonsense...
this eulogizing of Mohammad and his murderous actions...
I say:
Sunnah means what the prophet did and which did not go against God's commands. Along the way he was guided, corrected, and at times warned severely!
Again the litmus-test of the Sunnah is the Quran's text; interpretations can and indeed have varied but it's not impossible to be shown the light by God if one sincerely tried.
The Ramayana and Mahabharat wars are what exactly? Fighting over Sita with abductor Ravan is what? Please desist from bad-mouthing prophets; I've asked you for this before. Grow up from being a laddu to a 'moti-choor ka laddu', please...
And I have not been made familiar with the '40 plus shababiya age' bit as a Muslim. What is this that you mention anyway?
Peace.
Mr. Laddu,
Allow me to thank you for addressing me with kindness, but also allow me to say something more.
You said:
This sunnat nonsense...
this eulogizing of Mohammad and his murderous actions...
I say:
Sunnah means what the prophet did and which did not go against God's commands. Along the way he was guided, corrected, and at times warned severely!
Again the litmus-test of the Sunnah is the Quran's text; interpretations can and indeed have varied but it's not impossible to be shown the light by God if one sincerely tried.
The Ramayana and Mahabharat wars are what exactly? Fighting over Sita with abductor Ravan is what? Please desist from bad-mouthing prophets; I've asked you for this before. Grow up from being a laddu to a 'moti-choor ka laddu', please...
And I have not been made familiar with the '40 plus shababiya age' bit as a Muslim. What is this that you mention anyway?
Peace.
#117 Posted by tahir on January 30, 2008 11:16:56 pm
Re: # 112
Are you still grappling with this basic question?
Tut..tut..tut...
The answer my friend, is reading the TEXT itself. Do that NOW!
Are you still grappling with this basic question?
Tut..tut..tut...
The answer my friend, is reading the TEXT itself. Do that NOW!
#118 Posted by nkg on January 30, 2008 11:25:22 pm
Re: # 116
The Ramayana and Mahabharat wars are what exactly? Fighting over Sita with abductor Ravan is what?
Ans: There are thousands of sources of Ramayana. Read it.
Ramayana is not Sita alone. It is the story of Ram ( ideal son (left the kingdom to fulfill the promose of his father), ideal husband ( to bring back Sita from the clutch of abductors...), Ideal King). His entire life was struggle for others...
If Mo. was so humble, then from a poor financial background, how he had accumulated so much wealth when he had died? What crime is left which is not committed by Mo?
The Ramayana and Mahabharat wars are what exactly? Fighting over Sita with abductor Ravan is what?
Ans: There are thousands of sources of Ramayana. Read it.
Ramayana is not Sita alone. It is the story of Ram ( ideal son (left the kingdom to fulfill the promose of his father), ideal husband ( to bring back Sita from the clutch of abductors...), Ideal King). His entire life was struggle for others...
If Mo. was so humble, then from a poor financial background, how he had accumulated so much wealth when he had died? What crime is left which is not committed by Mo?
#119 Posted by nkg on January 30, 2008 11:31:54 pm
Re: # 117
Answer is, the biggest and most successful liar on earth committed the earliest work of plagrarism.
Answer is, the biggest and most successful liar on earth committed the earliest work of plagrarism.
#120 Posted by nkg on January 30, 2008 11:53:45 pm
Re: # 119
and forgot to mention...add some lethal hatred, violent stuff like this....
Garments of fire have been prepared for the unbelievers. Scalding water shall be poured upon their heads, melting their skins and that which is in their bellies. (Koran 22:19-22:23)
and forgot to mention...add some lethal hatred, violent stuff like this....
Garments of fire have been prepared for the unbelievers. Scalding water shall be poured upon their heads, melting their skins and that which is in their bellies. (Koran 22:19-22:23)
#121 Posted by nkg on January 31, 2008 12:03:29 am
Re: # 120
sorry...
some sex as well...
Koran 37:40-48
...They will sit with bashful, dark-eyed virgins, as chaste as the sheltered
eggs of ostriches.
Koran 44:51-55
...Yes and We shall wed them to dark-eyed houris. (beautiful virgins)
Koran 52:17-20
...They shall recline on couches ranged in rows. To dark-eyed houris
(virgins) we shall wed them...
Koran 55:56-57
In them will be bashful virgins neither man nor Jinn will have touched
before. Then which of the favors of your Lord will you deny ?"
Koran 55:57-58
Virgins as fair as corals and rubies. Then which of the favors of your Lord
will you deny ?"
Koran 56:7-40
...We created the houris (the beautiful women) and made them virgins, loving
companions for those on the right hand.. "
Koran 55:70-77
"In each there shall be virgins chaste and fair... Dark eyed virgins
sheltered in their tents whom neither man nor Jin will have touched before...
sorry...
some sex as well...
Koran 37:40-48
...They will sit with bashful, dark-eyed virgins, as chaste as the sheltered
eggs of ostriches.
Koran 44:51-55
...Yes and We shall wed them to dark-eyed houris. (beautiful virgins)
Koran 52:17-20
...They shall recline on couches ranged in rows. To dark-eyed houris
(virgins) we shall wed them...
Koran 55:56-57
In them will be bashful virgins neither man nor Jinn will have touched
before. Then which of the favors of your Lord will you deny ?"
Koran 55:57-58
Virgins as fair as corals and rubies. Then which of the favors of your Lord
will you deny ?"
Koran 56:7-40
...We created the houris (the beautiful women) and made them virgins, loving
companions for those on the right hand.. "
Koran 55:70-77
"In each there shall be virgins chaste and fair... Dark eyed virgins
sheltered in their tents whom neither man nor Jin will have touched before...
#122 Posted by nkg on January 31, 2008 12:04:41 am
Re: # 121
A+++ version of Mumbai movies...Large number of stupid follwers....
A+++ version of Mumbai movies...Large number of stupid follwers....
#123 Posted by jayp on January 31, 2008 12:26:11 am
Pervez,
The clear beginning of an education system that has a future is when you can deliver an Abdus Salaam memorial lecture in pakistan. That is when the pak society comprising of the YLH and zeemaz of pakistan have accepted that scientific achievements cannot be derrogated by the religion of the scientist, that is when the pakistanis have accepted that the fountain sprigs of scietific enquiry is not poisoned by the religiosity of the islamic republic of pakistan.
Till then, and that day is unlikely to come in your life time, Pervez please keep trying.
The clear beginning of an education system that has a future is when you can deliver an Abdus Salaam memorial lecture in pakistan. That is when the pak society comprising of the YLH and zeemaz of pakistan have accepted that scientific achievements cannot be derrogated by the religion of the scientist, that is when the pakistanis have accepted that the fountain sprigs of scietific enquiry is not poisoned by the religiosity of the islamic republic of pakistan.
Till then, and that day is unlikely to come in your life time, Pervez please keep trying.
#124 Posted by jayp on January 31, 2008 1:08:47 am
Pervez,
What is below is from an opinion piece in dawn of yesterday. Before we talk about the university research, let us fix up the school books.
It is a tragedy that truthful articles that come in dawn etc. ever find their place in chowk. Chowk, increasingly is a pak govt mouth piece as any criticism of pakistan results in being banned from chowk.
////////////////////////////
"I can’t take the liberty of advising my Hindu brothers and sisters across the border, but I can certainly expect sane elements in Pakistani society to think seriously about revising school and college textbooks so that they should reflect history somewhat rationally, and without describing Hindus as double-faced crooks and hypocrites who are out to shed Muslim blood.
Let us not forget that it were always the Muslims who invaded India, and that too not for the glory of Islam. Only Mohammad bin Qasim came for a valid reason but he too couldn’t resist conquering territories north of Sindh, perhaps, because in those times conquest was considered a legitimate activity.
There is this thing about calling names. I read a letter in a newspaper the other day about an Indian diplomat in Islamabad paying a social visit to a friendly Muslim family. It said that a small boy of five or six, coming to know that the guests were from India, began to shout “Hindu kutta! Hindu kutta!” Who had taught him that? His elders or a biased book on social studies digested by his senior brothers and sisters? In any case it can hardly be his fault for he was too young to know what he was doing. But his family should have been ashamed of his uncivil behaviour.
What is below is from an opinion piece in dawn of yesterday. Before we talk about the university research, let us fix up the school books.
It is a tragedy that truthful articles that come in dawn etc. ever find their place in chowk. Chowk, increasingly is a pak govt mouth piece as any criticism of pakistan results in being banned from chowk.
////////////////////////////
"I can’t take the liberty of advising my Hindu brothers and sisters across the border, but I can certainly expect sane elements in Pakistani society to think seriously about revising school and college textbooks so that they should reflect history somewhat rationally, and without describing Hindus as double-faced crooks and hypocrites who are out to shed Muslim blood.
Let us not forget that it were always the Muslims who invaded India, and that too not for the glory of Islam. Only Mohammad bin Qasim came for a valid reason but he too couldn’t resist conquering territories north of Sindh, perhaps, because in those times conquest was considered a legitimate activity.
There is this thing about calling names. I read a letter in a newspaper the other day about an Indian diplomat in Islamabad paying a social visit to a friendly Muslim family. It said that a small boy of five or six, coming to know that the guests were from India, began to shout “Hindu kutta! Hindu kutta!” Who had taught him that? His elders or a biased book on social studies digested by his senior brothers and sisters? In any case it can hardly be his fault for he was too young to know what he was doing. But his family should have been ashamed of his uncivil behaviour.
#125 Posted by nkg on January 31, 2008 1:23:47 am
Re: # 124
There is this thing about calling names. I read a letter in a newspaper the other day about an Indian diplomat in Islamabad paying a social visit to a friendly Muslim family. It said that a small boy of five or six, coming to know that the guests were from India, began to shout “Hindu kutta! Hindu kutta!” Who had taught him that? His elders or a biased book on social studies digested by his senior brothers and sisters? In any case it can hardly be his fault for he was too young to know what he was doing. But his family should have been ashamed of his uncivil behaviour.
Ans: I think, this is expected. Those who have surendered their identity to barbaric arab invaders ( the very person, who had raped their ancestors, destroyed their architecture, literature), what else you expect from them?
Any respect for the land that feeds?
Any respect for the 5000 years of great culture which he is part of?
The situation in Bangladesh is more ridiculous....
These people will always be slave to somebody, due to lack of self respect (whether USA, Saudi Arab etc...).
There is this thing about calling names. I read a letter in a newspaper the other day about an Indian diplomat in Islamabad paying a social visit to a friendly Muslim family. It said that a small boy of five or six, coming to know that the guests were from India, began to shout “Hindu kutta! Hindu kutta!” Who had taught him that? His elders or a biased book on social studies digested by his senior brothers and sisters? In any case it can hardly be his fault for he was too young to know what he was doing. But his family should have been ashamed of his uncivil behaviour.
Ans: I think, this is expected. Those who have surendered their identity to barbaric arab invaders ( the very person, who had raped their ancestors, destroyed their architecture, literature), what else you expect from them?
Any respect for the land that feeds?
Any respect for the 5000 years of great culture which he is part of?
The situation in Bangladesh is more ridiculous....
These people will always be slave to somebody, due to lack of self respect (whether USA, Saudi Arab etc...).
#126 Posted by tahir on January 31, 2008 1:45:36 am
Mr. Laddu as if you were not enough; now we have NKG to join the ranks! Amazing bigotry and ignorance, all learnt from newspapers and so-called Islamic websites!
The funny part is, despite your hatred for invaders (there were others apart from Arabs, by the way) you're still able to practise your faith, keep mother India, project the nudist Bollywood culture, and whatever else.
Today, the world is what it is because you provoke perfectly normal humans into becoming irrational fools.
Well, you've tried that with me. The ideal of my behaviour remains Muhammad, not Taliban.
As for the sin of venomous comments on this forum, the CHOWK editors must bear it.
Try the Raam way, if not the rakhshas Rawan way please...
The funny part is, despite your hatred for invaders (there were others apart from Arabs, by the way) you're still able to practise your faith, keep mother India, project the nudist Bollywood culture, and whatever else.
Today, the world is what it is because you provoke perfectly normal humans into becoming irrational fools.
Well, you've tried that with me. The ideal of my behaviour remains Muhammad, not Taliban.
As for the sin of venomous comments on this forum, the CHOWK editors must bear it.
Try the Raam way, if not the rakhshas Rawan way please...
#127 Posted by tahir on January 31, 2008 1:55:14 am
Interact Guidelines
The InterAct! space is provided to post replies to a published article. Interaction on Chowk is a privilege and a responsibility. Article replies are a permanent part of Chowk. The overall appeal of Chowk's content depends in large measure on the appeal and versatility of the discussions in the Interaction space. Please keep your interaction relevant to the article and its primary theme. Chowk encourages and appreciates critique and its defining value is freedom of expression.
In order to protect this freedom for all Chowkwalas, it is necessary to adhere to the rules of good conduct as spelled out below.
Please refrain from profanity and abusive language
Please refrain from personal attacks on writers and respondents.
Please refrain from frivolous statements that are inflammatory towards any race, nationality, ethnicity, gender, religion or other personal discriminations
Do not cut-and-paste copyright material from other sources on Chowk pages. If you wish to share an article from another source simply provide the link (URL) to that source.
Images of all kinds are discouraged as it slows down the site. Obscene images are not allowed. Large images of scanned pages pages will be removed as it slows page viewing for readers on slow connections. You may provide links to sites where text in other languages is available.
Please refrain from abusing the interaction spaces with plugs and unsolicited publicity for other websites and on-line and off-line services.
We understand that these rules can be difficult to follow when you have a strong opinion about an issue, or when another Interactor's viewpoints frustrate you. Please remember that the other Interactor is a person with a valid opinion, which you can probably change with reason and patience but abuse will not help your cause. Interactors are rated at Chowk, so please remember that the depth of your argument will earn the respect of other Chowkwalas, rather than aggression.
Chowk reserves the right to remove responses that do not conform to the basic guidelines.
The InterAct! space is provided to post replies to a published article. Interaction on Chowk is a privilege and a responsibility. Article replies are a permanent part of Chowk. The overall appeal of Chowk's content depends in large measure on the appeal and versatility of the discussions in the Interaction space. Please keep your interaction relevant to the article and its primary theme. Chowk encourages and appreciates critique and its defining value is freedom of expression.
In order to protect this freedom for all Chowkwalas, it is necessary to adhere to the rules of good conduct as spelled out below.
Please refrain from profanity and abusive language
Please refrain from personal attacks on writers and respondents.
Please refrain from frivolous statements that are inflammatory towards any race, nationality, ethnicity, gender, religion or other personal discriminations
Do not cut-and-paste copyright material from other sources on Chowk pages. If you wish to share an article from another source simply provide the link (URL) to that source.
Images of all kinds are discouraged as it slows down the site. Obscene images are not allowed. Large images of scanned pages pages will be removed as it slows page viewing for readers on slow connections. You may provide links to sites where text in other languages is available.
Please refrain from abusing the interaction spaces with plugs and unsolicited publicity for other websites and on-line and off-line services.
We understand that these rules can be difficult to follow when you have a strong opinion about an issue, or when another Interactor's viewpoints frustrate you. Please remember that the other Interactor is a person with a valid opinion, which you can probably change with reason and patience but abuse will not help your cause. Interactors are rated at Chowk, so please remember that the depth of your argument will earn the respect of other Chowkwalas, rather than aggression.
Chowk reserves the right to remove responses that do not conform to the basic guidelines.
#128 Posted by jayp on January 31, 2008 2:01:46 am
nkg,
Not so much an issue of self respect, but is that of an identity.
Pakistanis chose to take on the muslim identity, and they cannot go very far, because the leading light is in saudi arabia. They cannot take anything pre islamic, because that will destroy the TNT foundation.
Hence the poor pakistanis are doomed to be no-bodies. Many pakistanis in the west have tried to call themselves Desis, but no one else will take that identity.
It is a real tragedy, closest one can compare pakistan is to a congenital retarded child, blasted out by TNT.
Not so much an issue of self respect, but is that of an identity.
Pakistanis chose to take on the muslim identity, and they cannot go very far, because the leading light is in saudi arabia. They cannot take anything pre islamic, because that will destroy the TNT foundation.
Hence the poor pakistanis are doomed to be no-bodies. Many pakistanis in the west have tried to call themselves Desis, but no one else will take that identity.
It is a real tragedy, closest one can compare pakistan is to a congenital retarded child, blasted out by TNT.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- tahmed32: Ahmedi_Murad #179: yes indeed... Muslim Ghettoisation
- Ahmadi_Mureed: Reply to # 173... Muslim Ghettoisation
- BJ2: Re: # 174 Arjun, stop... Muslim Ghettoisation
- SRK: hamidm2 "..... i tell you,... Muslim Ghettoisation
- Ahmadi_Mureed: Reply to # 171... Muslim Ghettoisation
- BJ2: Masadi miaN, you should... Yet Another Immigrant Story
- tahmed32: mike #160 mirpur used... Muslim Ghettoisation
- _arjun9: hey masadi...we're still waiting... Muslim Ghettoisation








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content