William Dalrymple March 19, 2008
#161 Posted by zeemax on March 24, 2008 2:05:00 am
#114 Posted by Naqshbandi,
... for wobblers like u islam is not about devotion to allah and his messenger but all about killing and political power...
I dunno about that, but yours is certainly all about whirling around with a big dhol around the neck in sheer ecstasy brought about by 'love' of the Prophet Muhammad sustained by a heady punch of bhang.
Congratulations! Your murshid, Pappu Saeen of Baba Shah Jamal fame, has been awarded the 'Tamgha-e-Imtiaz' yesterday for doing just that and doing great service to the whirling variety of Islam.
... for wobblers like u islam is not about devotion to allah and his messenger but all about killing and political power...
I dunno about that, but yours is certainly all about whirling around with a big dhol around the neck in sheer ecstasy brought about by 'love' of the Prophet Muhammad sustained by a heady punch of bhang.
Congratulations! Your murshid, Pappu Saeen of Baba Shah Jamal fame, has been awarded the 'Tamgha-e-Imtiaz' yesterday for doing just that and doing great service to the whirling variety of Islam.
#162 Posted by akcheema on March 24, 2008 2:16:45 am
Re: # 161
"I dunno about that, but yours is certainly all about whirling around with a big dhol around the neck in sheer ecstasy brought about by 'love' of the Prophet Muhammad sustained by a heady punch of bhang".
LOL!
"I dunno about that, but yours is certainly all about whirling around with a big dhol around the neck in sheer ecstasy brought about by 'love' of the Prophet Muhammad sustained by a heady punch of bhang".
LOL!
#163 Posted by zeemax on March 24, 2008 2:55:41 am
#155 Posted by tahir,
Mr. Tahir, you're being too gracious in accepting this akcheema's apology which is neither sincere nor honest.
It is a white-lie. When he says in #113 "That is a pure oversight; I am not the world's fastest typist.", you should see how many words he types in all caps in his posts i.e. CAPITAL LETTERS ... and you'll know what I mean. This person (or whatever creature he is) does it deliberately.
As for his spelling of Qur'an, how many people who were educated in Pakistan spell it this way? The answer is NONE. This is straight out of faithfreedom.org and shows the crusader spelling of the name. Just as the pope of murtids rushdi spells Muhammad as Mahomet.
Re the envy of the male reproductive organ he mentioned, I suppose he would be well advised to solace the female amongst his nearest and dearest who has that sense of deprivation by saying to her that - as long as she has one of hers - she will have plenty of those!
Mr. Tahir, you're being too gracious in accepting this akcheema's apology which is neither sincere nor honest.
It is a white-lie. When he says in #113 "That is a pure oversight; I am not the world's fastest typist.", you should see how many words he types in all caps in his posts i.e. CAPITAL LETTERS ... and you'll know what I mean. This person (or whatever creature he is) does it deliberately.
As for his spelling of Qur'an, how many people who were educated in Pakistan spell it this way? The answer is NONE. This is straight out of faithfreedom.org and shows the crusader spelling of the name. Just as the pope of murtids rushdi spells Muhammad as Mahomet.
Re the envy of the male reproductive organ he mentioned, I suppose he would be well advised to solace the female amongst his nearest and dearest who has that sense of deprivation by saying to her that - as long as she has one of hers - she will have plenty of those!
#164 Posted by hamidm2 on March 24, 2008 3:09:28 am
Re: # 159
zeemax,
.... okay, so cowasjee is naked in the hamam with the rest of them - nawaz sharif, gilani and the choudhary brothers ..... but you must admit he has taken musharraf to task on the 'disappeared' and he has always called him the 'lesser evil' ..... besides, the man is just a loud mouth and not one of these politicians who seem to be up to their old tricks again ...... the venom and acrimony i see between the pml-n and mqm guys on tv does not bode well for the future ...... in a couple of months ppp might have to change 'partners' - i hope it doesn't happen, but it doesn't look good ...... as cowasjee says, "sala sub chore hai" .... you have to agree there is some truth to that
zeemax,
.... okay, so cowasjee is naked in the hamam with the rest of them - nawaz sharif, gilani and the choudhary brothers ..... but you must admit he has taken musharraf to task on the 'disappeared' and he has always called him the 'lesser evil' ..... besides, the man is just a loud mouth and not one of these politicians who seem to be up to their old tricks again ...... the venom and acrimony i see between the pml-n and mqm guys on tv does not bode well for the future ...... in a couple of months ppp might have to change 'partners' - i hope it doesn't happen, but it doesn't look good ...... as cowasjee says, "sala sub chore hai" .... you have to agree there is some truth to that
#165 Posted by akcheema on March 24, 2008 3:22:34 am
Re: # 163; Zeemax
"As for his spelling of Qur'an, how many people who were educated in Pakistan spell it this way? The answer is NONE."
That is exactly how it is spelt, not just in Pakistan, but most parts of the Muslim world. The Qura'an you suggested, I have not seen anywhere including Pakistan.
btw; Dawood's translation of the Qur'an is spelt as Koran; that happens to be a well respected translation. May be you should write to him as well.
Besides who is to decide how it should be spelt; that is not the original language of the text and it can potentially be spelt any way appropriate to convey the message as with any other proper noun.
This faithfreedom thing you keep refering to; on your recommendation, I did look up. There is nothing there I didn't know about; don't tell me I have presented you with any challenges from that web-site. As for the questions raised on that website, they all appear pretty genuine; regardless of who is asking, you should try to answer them perhaps. May be consult with Tahir Sahib and the others as well to "up the anti"! as they say.
What I write here, comes from my own mind, unless I specify, use quotes/parentheses or at times references or state that I came across some material elsewhere. May be you should try that so we all know who happens to be behind your ideas.
"As for his spelling of Qur'an, how many people who were educated in Pakistan spell it this way? The answer is NONE."
That is exactly how it is spelt, not just in Pakistan, but most parts of the Muslim world. The Qura'an you suggested, I have not seen anywhere including Pakistan.
btw; Dawood's translation of the Qur'an is spelt as Koran; that happens to be a well respected translation. May be you should write to him as well.
Besides who is to decide how it should be spelt; that is not the original language of the text and it can potentially be spelt any way appropriate to convey the message as with any other proper noun.
This faithfreedom thing you keep refering to; on your recommendation, I did look up. There is nothing there I didn't know about; don't tell me I have presented you with any challenges from that web-site. As for the questions raised on that website, they all appear pretty genuine; regardless of who is asking, you should try to answer them perhaps. May be consult with Tahir Sahib and the others as well to "up the anti"! as they say.
What I write here, comes from my own mind, unless I specify, use quotes/parentheses or at times references or state that I came across some material elsewhere. May be you should try that so we all know who happens to be behind your ideas.
#166 Posted by hamidm2 on March 24, 2008 3:25:58 am
Re: # 163
zeemax,
the pakis spell muhammad as mohammad or mohammed; the turks spell it as mehmed or mehmet; i call him mo of mecca ........ so what is the difference ? a false prophet by any other name still has clay feet .......sorry for the mixed metaphors, but you get the point ...
...... i really don't understand why you mohammedans (or muslims as you like to be called) get so upset about such petty things ..... seems to me that your faith is not as strong as the horrible hindoos who don't mind people making fun of their god's tail or nose ......what is it that causes you people to react so violently to percieved and real insults ? ...... look, you and others have insulted, abused and cussed my wife and daughters (real people as opposed to the bedouin in a cave) and i have just ignored it .....why can't you do the same ? .... what is it in your primitive brain that makes you start foaming at the mouth just because someone spells the silly book as 'koran' instead of the stylized 'qu'ran' or whatever ? ..... you guys remind me of the kid in fourth grade who would go into a blind rage if someone called him a homo; by eighth grade he had many boyfriends and finally found happiness .......
zeemax,
the pakis spell muhammad as mohammad or mohammed; the turks spell it as mehmed or mehmet; i call him mo of mecca ........ so what is the difference ? a false prophet by any other name still has clay feet .......sorry for the mixed metaphors, but you get the point ...
...... i really don't understand why you mohammedans (or muslims as you like to be called) get so upset about such petty things ..... seems to me that your faith is not as strong as the horrible hindoos who don't mind people making fun of their god's tail or nose ......what is it that causes you people to react so violently to percieved and real insults ? ...... look, you and others have insulted, abused and cussed my wife and daughters (real people as opposed to the bedouin in a cave) and i have just ignored it .....why can't you do the same ? .... what is it in your primitive brain that makes you start foaming at the mouth just because someone spells the silly book as 'koran' instead of the stylized 'qu'ran' or whatever ? ..... you guys remind me of the kid in fourth grade who would go into a blind rage if someone called him a homo; by eighth grade he had many boyfriends and finally found happiness .......
#167 Posted by akcheema on March 24, 2008 3:32:42 am
Re: # 165; Zeemax
just to clarify my education as it seems to have bothered you a bit. As I said befor on Gil Sahib's board, I was born in England and grew up between the UK and Pakistan; I have seen both worlds and since I live in yet another part of the world, gives me a lot deeper perspective than you'd ever have.
I speak/read/write english because it is almost my first language; on what grounds do you use "the gora boli"; then you went all funny when I mentioned "sour grapes" before!
just to clarify my education as it seems to have bothered you a bit. As I said befor on Gil Sahib's board, I was born in England and grew up between the UK and Pakistan; I have seen both worlds and since I live in yet another part of the world, gives me a lot deeper perspective than you'd ever have.
I speak/read/write english because it is almost my first language; on what grounds do you use "the gora boli"; then you went all funny when I mentioned "sour grapes" before!
#168 Posted by zeemax on March 24, 2008 3:36:48 am
#164 Posted by hamidm2,
Well, all I wanted to establish was that cowasjee has no credibility and you shouldn't quote him on anything. When he says "sala sub chore hai", that may be true or untrue, but one thing is certain that he himself is a big "Chor"....
Re "the venom and acrimony i see between the pml-n and mqm guys on tv does not bode well for the future", it indeed does not. I see this move of MQM to ditch the Chaudhries as some sort of wheeling dealing to get into the federal cabinet - in which case - PML-N will not join it and restrict itself to Punjab and form Punjab Government without PPP. That will in turn bring about the eventual fall of the government in the center, re-elections, and a clean 2/3rd sweep of PML-N in the next snap elections just as in 1997 because PML-Q will have dissolved by then.
The issue of PML-N re MQM is a very fair and principled one. They just want to know what exactly happened on May 12 in Karachi, what were the motives behind it, and who was responsible. Is enquiry into May 12 an unfair demand? MQM refuses to concede on that even though it claims innocence, and PPP is not asking for it either to get in bed with MQM - in order to preempt any move by Amin Fahim in forming a 'forward bloc' with MQM support in Sind.
PML-N has a clear and principled stand on each issue, in harmony with public sentiment, which will win them unprecedented support in the future while usurpers and conspirators will fall by the wayside.
Well, all I wanted to establish was that cowasjee has no credibility and you shouldn't quote him on anything. When he says "sala sub chore hai", that may be true or untrue, but one thing is certain that he himself is a big "Chor"....
Re "the venom and acrimony i see between the pml-n and mqm guys on tv does not bode well for the future", it indeed does not. I see this move of MQM to ditch the Chaudhries as some sort of wheeling dealing to get into the federal cabinet - in which case - PML-N will not join it and restrict itself to Punjab and form Punjab Government without PPP. That will in turn bring about the eventual fall of the government in the center, re-elections, and a clean 2/3rd sweep of PML-N in the next snap elections just as in 1997 because PML-Q will have dissolved by then.
The issue of PML-N re MQM is a very fair and principled one. They just want to know what exactly happened on May 12 in Karachi, what were the motives behind it, and who was responsible. Is enquiry into May 12 an unfair demand? MQM refuses to concede on that even though it claims innocence, and PPP is not asking for it either to get in bed with MQM - in order to preempt any move by Amin Fahim in forming a 'forward bloc' with MQM support in Sind.
PML-N has a clear and principled stand on each issue, in harmony with public sentiment, which will win them unprecedented support in the future while usurpers and conspirators will fall by the wayside.
#169 Posted by akcheema on March 24, 2008 3:41:22 am
Re: # 163; Zeemax
"Just as the pope of murtids rushdi spells Muhammad as Mahomet".
If you are referring to "the Satanic Verses", it was spelt/distorted to "Mohound" and NOT Mahomet.
Thought you needed everything clarified.
Truce now?
"Just as the pope of murtids rushdi spells Muhammad as Mahomet".
If you are referring to "the Satanic Verses", it was spelt/distorted to "Mohound" and NOT Mahomet.
Thought you needed everything clarified.
Truce now?
#170 Posted by zeemax on March 24, 2008 3:53:01 am
#166 Posted by hamidm2,
I have never cussed your wife. As per whatever you've told us about her, she seems like a good Momina, and I wouldn't mind asking for her hand in marriage when your Nikah is nullified by you officially declaring yourself a murtid.
I have never cussed your wife. As per whatever you've told us about her, she seems like a good Momina, and I wouldn't mind asking for her hand in marriage when your Nikah is nullified by you officially declaring yourself a murtid.
#171 Posted by zeemax on March 24, 2008 3:58:33 am
#167 Posted by akcheema,
I have seen both worlds and since I live in yet another part of the world, gives me a lot deeper perspective than you'd ever have.
Hmmm ... as if no others may have done the same, or the few who did, failed to develop any 'deep' perspectives.
But a dingo is a dingo in one place and a dog in another. The bark is the same! Doesn't change much with climate I guess ..
I have seen both worlds and since I live in yet another part of the world, gives me a lot deeper perspective than you'd ever have.
Hmmm ... as if no others may have done the same, or the few who did, failed to develop any 'deep' perspectives.
But a dingo is a dingo in one place and a dog in another. The bark is the same! Doesn't change much with climate I guess ..
#172 Posted by akcheema on March 24, 2008 4:00:23 am
Re: # 169; Zeemax
I apologise for some cheap remarks I might have made in anger; I don't think getting personal gets us anywhere.
I do sincerely mean it.
And keep your hands off other people's wives for God's sake!
Cheers.
I apologise for some cheap remarks I might have made in anger; I don't think getting personal gets us anywhere.
I do sincerely mean it.
And keep your hands off other people's wives for God's sake!
Cheers.
#173 Posted by zeemax on March 24, 2008 4:00:44 am
#169 Posted by akcheema,
No I'm not talking about the vermin's book. Have you seen any of his interviews?
No I'm not talking about the vermin's book. Have you seen any of his interviews?
#174 Posted by majumdar on March 24, 2008 4:04:44 am
Zee sahib,
Re: Spelling of the Prophet and the Holy Book
I guess just becuase someone spells it some way does not make him a bad way unless his intention was clearly to denigrate it. "Mahound" certainly seems to be in that catgeory. I have spelled Koran that way without having any desire to insulting anyone's sentiment.
And surely you cannot overlook the fact that MAJ (pbuh) spelt his name as Mahomet. And he was probably Islam's greatest leader by a mile since the days of the rightly guided Caliphs. Certainly not a anti-Muslim or a murtid by any chance.
Regards
Re: Spelling of the Prophet and the Holy Book
I guess just becuase someone spells it some way does not make him a bad way unless his intention was clearly to denigrate it. "Mahound" certainly seems to be in that catgeory. I have spelled Koran that way without having any desire to insulting anyone's sentiment.
And surely you cannot overlook the fact that MAJ (pbuh) spelt his name as Mahomet. And he was probably Islam's greatest leader by a mile since the days of the rightly guided Caliphs. Certainly not a anti-Muslim or a murtid by any chance.
Regards
#176 Posted by akcheema on March 24, 2008 4:46:32 am
Re: # 174; Majumdar Bhai
aren't you upgrading MAJ's status a little too high here? And btw, pbuh is usually only reserved for prophets; before someone else tries to set you straight! I personally don't care.
The man was an agnostic, drank and ate pork/ham openly; married a Parsi girl and produced a Parsi child. Couldn't even say "Namaz/Salat". I have nothing against that personally, but you are adament he wasn't a murtid!
All his "persona" of a "mard-e-momin" was created and refined to an art form after his death. You should read in detail before allocating him sainthood, I reckon!
Cheers.
aren't you upgrading MAJ's status a little too high here? And btw, pbuh is usually only reserved for prophets; before someone else tries to set you straight! I personally don't care.
The man was an agnostic, drank and ate pork/ham openly; married a Parsi girl and produced a Parsi child. Couldn't even say "Namaz/Salat". I have nothing against that personally, but you are adament he wasn't a murtid!
All his "persona" of a "mard-e-momin" was created and refined to an art form after his death. You should read in detail before allocating him sainthood, I reckon!
Cheers.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- tahir: Just looking! What, nobody... Nipa Chowrangi
- tahir: Re: # 376 "She wrote... Persecution of Religious Minorities
- zeemax: #374 Posted by tahir, Yes... Persecution of Religious Minorities
- tahir: Re: # 358 Cow-drain Urchin-666, Learn... Persecution of Religious Minorities
- rangeela: Main pyaas ka sahra... Saqi Farooqi ... A
- tahir: Re: # 356 "never knew... Persecution of Religious Minorities
- aquaris: They haven't got it... Mohajirs Are People Too
- zeemax: #372 Posted by tahir, LoL... Persecution of Religious Minorities








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content