Surviving Musharraf's Exit?
Moeed Pirzada March 28, 2008
#547 Posted by peonoftheeast on April 4, 2008 2:55:16 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content
#546 Posted by zeemax on April 4, 2008 2:53:11 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#545 Posted by hamidm2 on April 4, 2008 2:49:35 am
hp mian,
so now like the poor mirasi at the wedding we are willing to accept 'new elections in six months' ?????
.... okay, fine ..... what will change ? .... how will the balance of seats in the national and provincial assembly change ? ..... and how do we know the change will not make things even worse, resulting in the anarchy that the islamofascists are hoping for ? .... i can come up with a dozen equally likely scenarios that can result in disaster, but i won't because it is just too scary ........
so now like the poor mirasi at the wedding we are willing to accept 'new elections in six months' ?????
.... okay, fine ..... what will change ? .... how will the balance of seats in the national and provincial assembly change ? ..... and how do we know the change will not make things even worse, resulting in the anarchy that the islamofascists are hoping for ? .... i can come up with a dozen equally likely scenarios that can result in disaster, but i won't because it is just too scary ........
#544 Posted by peonoftheeast on April 4, 2008 2:48:52 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#543 Posted by peonofthewest on April 4, 2008 2:41:17 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#542 Posted by zeemax on April 4, 2008 2:31:25 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#541 Posted by zeemax on April 4, 2008 2:29:47 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#540 Posted by peonofthewest on April 4, 2008 2:23:00 am
Re: # 539
treetop saab, i am available saab. may be you can put in a word for me saab?
treetop saab, i am available saab. may be you can put in a word for me saab?
#539 Posted by treetop on April 4, 2008 2:18:19 am
Re: # 538
Probably this new couple will need a peon.
Probably this new couple will need a peon.
#538 Posted by peonofthewest on April 4, 2008 2:12:52 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#537 Posted by zeemax on April 4, 2008 12:09:44 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#536 Posted by sgb on April 3, 2008 11:57:39 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#535 Posted by zeemax on April 3, 2008 11:52:00 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#534 Posted by zeemax on April 3, 2008 11:24:08 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#533 Posted by MrsSharma on April 3, 2008 10:28:38 pm
There is a real drama of succession, that is succession of pakistan. The 1973 constitution did away with what was the west pakistan till then. It renamed itself as pakistan.
Now the question is about the next constitution, will it rename Punjab as pakistan or not.
There is an opportunity for the pakistanis to revise teh constitution to give autonomy to the provines, but the history of creation of bangladesh shows that it is not likely to happen. Pakistan should be broken up into three, that is what fibonocci series says.
India, then it bacame two, pakistan and india, now it is three, pakistan, india and bangladesh. Next is five. India, bangladesh, and please choose the names of the other three created by the break up of todays pakistan.
Now the question is about the next constitution, will it rename Punjab as pakistan or not.
There is an opportunity for the pakistanis to revise teh constitution to give autonomy to the provines, but the history of creation of bangladesh shows that it is not likely to happen. Pakistan should be broken up into three, that is what fibonocci series says.
India, then it bacame two, pakistan and india, now it is three, pakistan, india and bangladesh. Next is five. India, bangladesh, and please choose the names of the other three created by the break up of todays pakistan.
#532 Posted by zeemax on April 3, 2008 10:02:18 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- anil: Re: # 33 Madani Sahib: "...Mr.... The Wrong Mix
- masadi: tahmed peon of the... The Wrong Mix
- CheGuevara: Err the ideologue behind... The Wrong Mix
- nasah: Re: # 77' "As for... The Wrong Mix
- sattar2: Urstruly (#328), I couldn’t help... Persecution of Religious Minorities
- bulleya: Speaking of art, the... The Wrong Mix
- smellthecoffee: #124 Posted by rf786,... Mohajirs Are People Too
- dost_mittar: hamidm#47: For once, your sarcasm... The Wrong Mix
