Europe and the Film Culture

the link to the shaykh's response -- since i cannot embed videos in this version of chowk!

http://www.mihpirzada.com/videos/fitnamovie.html

i saw the film and it was boring and dishonest and, even as propaganda, failed miserably. a damp squib. is it worth getting cross over? no. best response to this is to ignore it although shaykh pirzada's intellectual destruction of the falsehoods and dishonesty in it is brilliant and how all muslims should respond:

"There are three kinds of men in this world; fighters, collaborators, and traitors."

Good one, tahir bhai. It's easy to misperceive the world as divided into different fighting groups. But it will help to break down 'fighters' further into active fighters, collaborators, and even simple raw materials - the water carriers and such, with collaborators of one group becoming the traitors for the other.

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

i think fitna is an ordinary movie. i would have liked to see a movie on the project of cloning mohammad from the eyes of his idolator victims. complete with gory beheadings and rapes commited in the name of formless allah. i would love to see the islamists fight the charges by my idolator forefathers. let the international couts decide whether quran should be banned or not. let the character of mohammad be discussed in the courts......i would certainly welcome it.....

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts