The Psychology of Mothering

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

The shrink writes " i share with couples that love that does not have genuine respect is suspicious.."

Another goddamned Deepak Chopra, and they pay him their hard earned money for this BS, can't you see they are clutching at straws, they get a cock and bull tale from their preacher and an equally outrages nonsense (borrowed from the lovey dovey preachers) from their shrink...they cannot see their society how it is setup to manipulate, frustrate and ruin them and their relationships, they cannot see this, they cannot change the system so they go to these morons pushed by the elite that convince them that their problems and their troubles are their own creating they are "private" and "unique" and not public and social...that is why these shrinks live off the flesh of the public and serve the powers that be....

You shrinks make me sick.....g'night

Dr. Sohail and Others, if you were to prescribe a drug to treat Masadi's neuroses, what would be it be?

I am thinking nerve gas

"Fathers of girls have this natural affinity for females".

So are male off-springs either a result of rape or all conceived in test-tubes, given that their fathers do not possess any affinity towards females?

Re: # 159
dear bubba..Scott Peck is a very respectable writer. I liked his book
World Waiting to be born
but i think his definition is a bit bland. Accepting onself and others is part of it but it also has more. Love is a passion and affection and creativity that we all experience but cannot describe. Over here we are talking about nurturing and caring that parents feel instinctively and develop culturally for their children. greeks also separated platonic...friendly love from erotic...romantic love....sohail

Re: # 164

Massaddi Mian:

"You shrinks make me sick.....g'night..."

So each night you to bed feeling sick. No wonder. Lage Raho Massaddi Mian, Lage Raho.

Re: # 166

All I was trying, was to point out to the author, that his having daughters may be the reason for his pro-feminist biases. Obviously fathers do not have a say in the gender of the children they concieve, or a very insignificant portion do. But its a mystery why 'female-foeticide', if the feminists are to be believed, exists, because from statistics, more suicides are by males - by some 4 to 1!

Here is an article I picked from the morning paper. Looks like the Supreme Court needs a psychotherapist like the author!


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Couple_told_to_reunite_after_17-year_sepa ration/articleshow/2960404.cms

Re: # 150

Slyder

I wonder how you came to know about the problems of the 50+, especially their erectile dysfunction?

Don't be disappointed as surgery can today make them more functional erectically than the normal one. Dr AKCheema can perhaps advise us in this respect.

Re: # 165

"...if you were to prescribe a drug to treat Masadi's neuroses, what would be it be?..."

Prescribe him laughing gas, Massaddi Mian probably has not laughed all his life.

Re: # 165

"...if you were to prescribe a drug to treat Masadi's neuroses, what would be it be?..."

Prescribe him laughing gas, Massaddi Mian probably has not laughed all his life.

masadi: #161 you actually managed to write a post without slipping into your native language (i.e. bark! bark!). i am impressed. give yourself a pat on the back. no need to thank me for the appreciation though..helping troubled youth is after all the reason we ancient uncles are there. you may break into your native language (i.e. bark! bark!) in response to this post though, since it would be expecting too much of you to control yourself in your excitement at having made a good impression on me.

as for the substance of what you wrote, that was bs of course. but dont let that discourage you. one step at a time. rome wasnt built in a day, nor will you become sane with one post either.

so focus on getting your form right, and then next year we'll start working on getting your substance right as well!! substance follows form, at least in your case. within a couple of decades, your ignorance will be a thing of the past and we will then all be able to laugh about it. without even the need for laughing gas, as suggested by your kindly uncle Anil sahib!!

teshah: slyder actually is actually a balding, portly mid-40's uncle with a special interest in internet porn (I am not making this up - his contributions to unplugged consist basically of porn postings of girls half his age). chowk took away his nick (which was Ali1, black sheep of the St. Mary's alumni), and he has been slyding off-balance ever since, completely in denial that he is anything but a schoolboy himself.

tahmed writes "as for the substance of what you wrote, that was bs of course.."

Please tell us how and why its BS, rather than this cheap one liner, otherwise the kind people here might be forced to conclude that you lack the brains and the balls to respond to your opponents quite well thought out and argued post....

In addition to #161 that these shrinks cannot refute, let me post this news report:..

---
Stay calm everyone, there's Prozac in the drinking waterMark Townsend The Observer,
Sunday August 8 2004
This article appeared in the Observer on Sunday August 08 2004 on p1 of the News section.

It should make us happy, but environmentalists are deeply alarmed: Prozac, the anti-depression drug, is being taken in such large quantities that it can now be found in Britain's drinking water.

Environmentalists are calling for an urgent investigation into the revelations, describing the build-up of the antidepressant as 'hidden mass medication'. The Environment Agency has revealed that Prozac is building up both in river systems and groundwater used for drinking supplies.

The government's chief environment watchdog recently held a series of meetings with the pharmaceutical industry to discuss any repercussions for human health or the ecosystem.

The discovery raises fresh fears that GPs are overprescribing Prozac, Britain's antidepressant of choice. In the decade up to 2001, overall prescriptions of antidepressants rose from nine million to 24 million a year.

A recent report by the Environment Agency concluded Prozac could be potentially toxic in the water table and said the drug was a 'potential concern'.

However, the precise quantity of Prozac in the nation's water supplies remains unknown. The government's Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) said Prozac was likely to be found in a considerably 'watered down' form that was unlikely to pose a health risk.

Dr Andy Croxford, the Environment's Agency's policy manager for pesticides, told The Observer: 'We need to determine the effects of this low-level, almost continuous discharge.'

Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat's environment spokesman, said the revelations exposed a failing by the government on an important public health issue. He added that the public should be told if they were inadvertently taking drugs like Prozac.

'This looks like a case of hidden mass medication upon the unsuspecting public,' Baker said. 'It is alarming that there is no monitoring of levels of Prozac and other pharmacy residues in our drinking water.'

Experts say that Prozac finds its way into rivers and water systems from treated sewage water. Some believe the drugs could affect their reproductive ability.

European studies have also expressed disquiet over the impact of pharmaceuticals building up in the environment, warning that an effect on wildlife and human health 'cannot be excluded'.

'It is extremely unlikely that there is a risk, as such drugs are excreted in very low concentrations,' a DWI spokesman said. 'Advanced treatment processes installed for pesticide removal are effective in removing drug residues,' he added.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/aug/08/health.mentalhealth