In the Name of Allah, the Most Merciful

#893 Posted by Pardesi on April 27, 2008 1:10:54 pm

you'll have to wait a long time for that one...islamofascists aren't big on intellectual honesty...or anything that even remotely resembles criticism of saudi arabia...

#865 Arjun

"so either the restrictions on women and ban on any other religion in saudi arabia is islamic or the saudis aren't muslims.. so which one is it?"

Arjun, when you get the answer, can you please let us know also?

Thank you.

#889 Posted by Urstruly on April 27, 2008 1:00:24 pm

maulana urstruly: why would the US government need to send untrained newbies to do that?

they have mushy by the balls...and by his bilals..

#871 Posted by Urstruly on April 27, 2008 11:23:51 am

"I am talking about our Hindustan. It only broke up into pieces when European secularism was forced down our throats.
One should give the credit where it is due."

You are an intelligent and well read young man. I thought you knew that when British came, our United Punjab, Kashmir, NWFA etc. were all under Sikh rule and Marhattas ruled most of central India and rest was under various Muslim Nawabs. It was British who united India, until a native bright secularist fought in 40s, and succeeded, in dividing it again on religious lines.

#882 Posted by tahir on April 27, 2008 11:59:03 am


What was a Wall Street man upto, running after the alleged top terrorists?


goatbrain: he was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal...it's a newspaper..look it up..

Re: # 884 zeemax

My theory is that daniel, asra and company were sent here to find out where paki generals had stashed laundered money across the globe so that each one of them could be controlled with tight leash. shoukat aziz fits here somewhere too but I can't put my finger on it yet. But these two a-holes pissed off too many people. Most probably the hit was ordered by the generals.

#886 Posted by Eklavya,

Yeah I know.

#882 tahir

[What was a Wall Street man upto, running after the alleged top terrorists?]

If you understood that, you would not be a Muslim.

zee and others who might up on this piece of gossip, I heard asra nomani has become a tantrika, and claims tantra as part of her Islamic identity now.

That sounds very odd but sufis and ahmedis have made far more bizarre claims so I wouldn't dismiss that bit of craziness totally off hand.

#876 Posted by tahir on April 27, 2008 11:34:04 am

goatbrain: what're you going to do with your 72 virgins? sell them for 20$ each? or tell them to get themselves raped so they can get visas and make $$?

#882 Posted by tahir

What was a Wall Street man upto, running after the alleged top terrorists?

Aaah ... you missed the Asra Nomani connection here, who arranged all logistics pulling strings horizontally with the very top brass, and fucking that spy as well to keep him happy in that Defence Society bungalow they rented! Maybe it was to get Investment Banking money from 'terrorist' clients for her Wall Street boyfriend?

And then, went on to lead a women's Namaz congregation in NY as well ... LoL!

Tahir Bhai ... that Pearl guy was lucky he just lost his head. I think they pardoned Asra for being a woman. Otherwise she wouldn't have had a head anymore to put her Muslim scarf on.

#879 Posted by ajeya,

You really took the effort to type this? I couldn't type 1/10th of that. Bravo!

Re: # 879
"Unfortunately there are too many Daniel Pearls in this world..."

What was a Wall Street man upto, running after the alleged top terrorists?

"enables the cult of mohammed to prosper and keep laying it's poison eggs."

You worship your ancestors as gods and goddesses, you have cults within a cult, not Muslims! We're not supposed to glorify or magnify Muhammmad (peace on him) beyond a certain limit. He was only a deliverer of God's message which you've unfortunately missed reading.

Read it first Mr. Ajeya.

Time for a commercial break (have a Kit-Kat gentlemen)!

The vital statistics (no, not those!) of Miss Najma-goes-to-torn-apart-Ronto are (starting with her first effort):

4 days, 5,000 hits
5 days, 10,000 hits
17 days, 29,000 hits
5 days, 3,800 hits
6 days (current article), 16,000 hits

These figures were very kindly leaked by the USeless Elite. Their super-computer's data confirms my theory that someone (why Najma?) and her sponsors have been busy clicking these articles!

Sleep well.

#878 Posted by treetop on April 27, 2008 11:38:47 am

watch them have sex with the 72 virgins...what's he going to do with the virgins? he can't get it up...

misc by dost_mittar

Dost-Mittar,

I think you'd do well not to discuss "universal human values" with "humans" like zeemax and urstruly. The odious nature of these individuals' beliefs indicates that "human values" depends on which human you are talking about. I still remember once when urstruly was suggesting that the Afghani women who were prostituting themselves at the risk of losing their lives, just to feed their starving kids, were doing so as an option, and deserved a dog's death. And zeemax has proved time and again why people like him should be put in forced labor camps with very high walls.

And on the discussion of the merits and demerits of Hinduism's "human sacrifices" and "sati" vs. Islam's perversions. You could always say that because Hindus are not trying to convert anyone, so if Hindus are sacrificing other hindus on the alter, or forcing their women to perform Sati, it is a self-contained problem, and not affecting anyone else. Islam, on the other hand HAS TO FACE public criticism - if you are trying to sell your Mutual Fund to the public and claiming it is the best prescription for anybody's financial health, then guess what, the general public has every right to dissect your Mutual Fund very publicly. So it is with Islam, which has been hawking its wares everywhere since it's inception.

And as far as tahmed is concerned, he does have many of the right values in mind, and he is always trying to "reconcile" what he knows to be the right human values with what is written in the good book. He is eternally trying to fit a square peg in a round hole, and his tortured arguments trying to justify this or that vile statement in the "holy" book, or this or that monstrous deed by mo is both funny and sad to watch, at the same time.

But unfortunately, this is what makes tahmed much more dangerous than urstruly or zeemax. While in any civilized society, if urstruly and zeemax make their views known publicly, they would get themselves locked away promptly, tahmed would go unnoticed. Because it is people like him, and not Osama Bin Laden, that are more insidious - the veil of deception (whether it is due to calculation or crass idiocy as in the case of Tahmed) protects the cult of Islam, and enables it to thrive and prosper and extend its tentacles far and wide inside an unsuspecting civilized society. Unfortunately there are too many Daniel Pearls in this world, and while these liberals are the first ones to be executed or imprisoned in any Islamic society, in a democratic society their good-intentioned idealism is what enables the cult of mohammed to prosper and keep laying it's poison eggs.