Feroz Qutabshahi April 29, 2008
#113 Posted by HP on April 30, 2008 8:56:45 pm
#89 Posted by arjun_5
#2 HP
Here is what I wrote and I challenge this retard to respond to that. It took this Manassas Park cabbie to find one Brig General.
It will take this cabbie,
living-in-a-crummy-stinky-apartment-with-five-other-cabbies, another ten years to get the info.
“Show me two black four star generals in the last ten years. Don’t pull Powell out of the bag. He retired more than ten years ago.
Show me five black Generals who went past Brig. General in the last ten years!
How many Generals have led the war in Iraq in the last five years? Talk is cheap the reality is a little different.”
Hahaha! Then this retard writes:
“so if there are no 4 star general who is black, this means the armed forces are racist...”
Okay cabbie, they are not racists but they don’t make Generals out of the black officers as frequently as they should considering the black representation in the army is much higher than its population percentage in the country.
This retard cabbie adds more misery to his already fked life of a cabbie.
“As of March, 2008, BG Brooks is the special assistant to the commanding general, III Corps, Raymond T. Odierno, at Fort Hood, Texas.”
Do you even know what command position is? He is a special assistant to the commanding General not the commanding General. Fking retard, Try google again!
…And try not to be quite so brilliant next time, ok? You are still a dime a dozen cabbie! Fker lives in a Manassas park apt. and talks like a cabbie too.
#2 HP
Here is what I wrote and I challenge this retard to respond to that. It took this Manassas Park cabbie to find one Brig General.
It will take this cabbie,
living-in-a-crummy-stinky-apartment-with-five-other-cabbies, another ten years to get the info.
“Show me two black four star generals in the last ten years. Don’t pull Powell out of the bag. He retired more than ten years ago.
Show me five black Generals who went past Brig. General in the last ten years!
How many Generals have led the war in Iraq in the last five years? Talk is cheap the reality is a little different.”
Hahaha! Then this retard writes:
“so if there are no 4 star general who is black, this means the armed forces are racist...”
Okay cabbie, they are not racists but they don’t make Generals out of the black officers as frequently as they should considering the black representation in the army is much higher than its population percentage in the country.
This retard cabbie adds more misery to his already fked life of a cabbie.
“As of March, 2008, BG Brooks is the special assistant to the commanding general, III Corps, Raymond T. Odierno, at Fort Hood, Texas.”
Do you even know what command position is? He is a special assistant to the commanding General not the commanding General. Fking retard, Try google again!
…And try not to be quite so brilliant next time, ok? You are still a dime a dozen cabbie! Fker lives in a Manassas park apt. and talks like a cabbie too.
#114 Posted by bjkumar on April 30, 2008 8:59:57 pm
Arjun_5, since you are so hard on the Pakistani souls here, who - being bhoala-bhala, are unable to defend themselves, let me - as a gesture of charity and with the desire to create harmony, post the following text from a site called (what else!) "cousincouples.com"!
--------------------
Some people are fixated on the fallacy that cousin couples pose an intolerable risk to their offspring. However it is likely that we are all descendants of cousin marriages. Before civil laws banning cousin marriages, it was preferable to marry a cousin in some communities as it is to this day in many countries. The notion “why marry a stranger" is just as prevalent in many countries as the cousin marriage taboo in America today.
There is a wide range of opinions on the subject of cousin marriages. This is fuelled by erroneous information, bigotry, and presumptions. Further we have civil laws and religious creeds based on obsolete information.
The facts about cousin marriages are much clearer.
There are no contemporary studies that indicate cousins have children with significantly higher than normal birth defects. Fears of cousins who marry having children with birth defects are indeed exaggerated. Simply marrying within your own race increases the odds of birth defects. Marrying within your own town further increases your chances. Cousin couples have only a slightly higher incidence of birth defects than non-related couples.
Fact: 26 states allow first cousin marriages; Most people can marry their cousin in the US.
Fact: US prohibitions against cousin marriages predate modern genetics.
Fact: In the first quarter of 2000, two delegates in Maryland introduced a bill that would prohibit first cousin marriage. This bill passed in the House of Delegates (82 to 46), however did not make it past the Senate Committee. ....The sponsors of the bill claim that a large ratio of out-of-state couples come to Maryland to get married – perhaps cousin couples. Their bill would have stifled revenues from marriage licenses while imposing ...marriage restrictions.
Fact: No European country prohibits marriage between first cousins. It is also legal throughout Canada and Mexico to marry your cousin. The USA is the only western country with cousin marriage restrictions.
Fact: Children of non-related couples have a 2-3% risk of birth defects, as opposed to first cousins having a 4-6% risk. Genetic counseling is available for those couples that may be at a special risk for birth defects (e.g. You have a defect that runs in your family) In plain terms first cousins have at a 94 percent + chance of having healthy children. Check the links section for more information on genetic counselors. The National Society of Genetic Counselors estimated the increased risk for first cousins is between 1.7 to 2.8 percent, or about the same a any woman over 40 years of age.
Fact: Second cousins have little, if any increased chance of having children with birth defects, per the book "Clinical Genetics Handbook”– courtesy of the March of Dimes.
Fact: The frequency of cousin marriages in the USA is about 1 in 1,000
Fact: The frequency of cousin marriages in Japan is about 4 in 1,000
Fact: It is estimated that 20 percent of all couples worldwide are first cousins. It is also estimated that 80 percent of all marriages historically have been between first cousins!
Fact: In some cultures, the term cousin and mate are synonymous.
Fact: The range of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia is between 34 to 80+ percent. A study has been done on birth defects resulting from consanguineous marriages in this country....
Fact: Albert Einstein married his first cousin. And so did Charles Darwin, who had exceptional children.
Fact: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the longest serving US president in history married his cousin (not a first cousin, however they shared the same last name).
Fact: The first Prime Minister of Canada, Sir John A. MacDonald married his first cousin.
Fact: Leviticus 18 lists all forbidden sexual relationships. Cousin relationships are not included.
Fact: God commanded many cousins to marry, including Zelophehad's 5 daughters, Eleazar's daughters, Jacob (who married both Rachel and Leah, first cousins), and Isaac and Rebekkah (first cousins once removed). All were ancestors of Jesus Christ.
Fact: Current studies indicate that cousin couples have a lower ratio of miscarriages -- perhaps because body chemistry of cousins is more similar. The verdict is still out.
--------------------
Some people are fixated on the fallacy that cousin couples pose an intolerable risk to their offspring. However it is likely that we are all descendants of cousin marriages. Before civil laws banning cousin marriages, it was preferable to marry a cousin in some communities as it is to this day in many countries. The notion “why marry a stranger" is just as prevalent in many countries as the cousin marriage taboo in America today.
There is a wide range of opinions on the subject of cousin marriages. This is fuelled by erroneous information, bigotry, and presumptions. Further we have civil laws and religious creeds based on obsolete information.
The facts about cousin marriages are much clearer.
There are no contemporary studies that indicate cousins have children with significantly higher than normal birth defects. Fears of cousins who marry having children with birth defects are indeed exaggerated. Simply marrying within your own race increases the odds of birth defects. Marrying within your own town further increases your chances. Cousin couples have only a slightly higher incidence of birth defects than non-related couples.
Fact: 26 states allow first cousin marriages; Most people can marry their cousin in the US.
Fact: US prohibitions against cousin marriages predate modern genetics.
Fact: In the first quarter of 2000, two delegates in Maryland introduced a bill that would prohibit first cousin marriage. This bill passed in the House of Delegates (82 to 46), however did not make it past the Senate Committee. ....The sponsors of the bill claim that a large ratio of out-of-state couples come to Maryland to get married – perhaps cousin couples. Their bill would have stifled revenues from marriage licenses while imposing ...marriage restrictions.
Fact: No European country prohibits marriage between first cousins. It is also legal throughout Canada and Mexico to marry your cousin. The USA is the only western country with cousin marriage restrictions.
Fact: Children of non-related couples have a 2-3% risk of birth defects, as opposed to first cousins having a 4-6% risk. Genetic counseling is available for those couples that may be at a special risk for birth defects (e.g. You have a defect that runs in your family) In plain terms first cousins have at a 94 percent + chance of having healthy children. Check the links section for more information on genetic counselors. The National Society of Genetic Counselors estimated the increased risk for first cousins is between 1.7 to 2.8 percent, or about the same a any woman over 40 years of age.
Fact: Second cousins have little, if any increased chance of having children with birth defects, per the book "Clinical Genetics Handbook”– courtesy of the March of Dimes.
Fact: The frequency of cousin marriages in the USA is about 1 in 1,000
Fact: The frequency of cousin marriages in Japan is about 4 in 1,000
Fact: It is estimated that 20 percent of all couples worldwide are first cousins. It is also estimated that 80 percent of all marriages historically have been between first cousins!
Fact: In some cultures, the term cousin and mate are synonymous.
Fact: The range of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia is between 34 to 80+ percent. A study has been done on birth defects resulting from consanguineous marriages in this country....
Fact: Albert Einstein married his first cousin. And so did Charles Darwin, who had exceptional children.
Fact: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the longest serving US president in history married his cousin (not a first cousin, however they shared the same last name).
Fact: The first Prime Minister of Canada, Sir John A. MacDonald married his first cousin.
Fact: Leviticus 18 lists all forbidden sexual relationships. Cousin relationships are not included.
Fact: God commanded many cousins to marry, including Zelophehad's 5 daughters, Eleazar's daughters, Jacob (who married both Rachel and Leah, first cousins), and Isaac and Rebekkah (first cousins once removed). All were ancestors of Jesus Christ.
Fact: Current studies indicate that cousin couples have a lower ratio of miscarriages -- perhaps because body chemistry of cousins is more similar. The verdict is still out.
#115 Posted by ana on April 30, 2008 9:10:20 pm
harimau #80
On the other hand, Yousuf Yohanna embraced The True Faith.
Question here: did Yousuf Yohanna have to be circumcised? For how long couldn't he play cricket afterwards? How about have sex? Inquiring minds want to know.
This may come as a shock to you, or perhaps not, but Christian males in Pakistan do get circumsised. So it's very possible that Yousaf was circumsised looooong before his conversion to Islam. And if that's the case, the other questions don't apply.
I may regret having answered this question in seriousness.
On the other hand, Yousuf Yohanna embraced The True Faith.
Question here: did Yousuf Yohanna have to be circumcised? For how long couldn't he play cricket afterwards? How about have sex? Inquiring minds want to know.
This may come as a shock to you, or perhaps not, but Christian males in Pakistan do get circumsised. So it's very possible that Yousaf was circumsised looooong before his conversion to Islam. And if that's the case, the other questions don't apply.
I may regret having answered this question in seriousness.
#116 Posted by rangeela on April 30, 2008 9:47:59 pm
Ahmed madani and his goobledegook posted below:
Re: # 84 China mongol men love their race but women have no pride. They all go for operatins for make them look more like white/ europe race. They marry many lower race men to get entrance to west. General china race women mimick white race women. They are racist against black africa and mixed arab/ african race people. I read in usa china race women who are educated new generation catching white educated men. They have race element in thier mi8nd , they will long way for white ugly man but will not even date black man. China women make problems for white and black women indirectly. As black will happily marry white ( note china woman took white man) as it color change which signifies his coming of age in usa. Now this creates big problem for black women.]
Mr. Madani.
Despite your knowledge about chinese women,I can bet you a penny that you did not know that the chinese pussies are horizontal.
Re: # 84 China mongol men love their race but women have no pride. They all go for operatins for make them look more like white/ europe race. They marry many lower race men to get entrance to west. General china race women mimick white race women. They are racist against black africa and mixed arab/ african race people. I read in usa china race women who are educated new generation catching white educated men. They have race element in thier mi8nd , they will long way for white ugly man but will not even date black man. China women make problems for white and black women indirectly. As black will happily marry white ( note china woman took white man) as it color change which signifies his coming of age in usa. Now this creates big problem for black women.]
Mr. Madani.
Despite your knowledge about chinese women,I can bet you a penny that you did not know that the chinese pussies are horizontal.
#117 Posted by masadi on May 1, 2008 1:57:17 am
arjun writes "masadi: stop pulling numbers out of your ass.."
Very nice to note that you can copy paste photographs but can't think worth sh**. My numbers from the 2000 census were individual incomes, you put family/household incomes, asian households are larger with more people working per household, also comparison with ALL US households which include black and latino low income ones that drag the white total down is disingenuous- Also the percentage of foreign born and privilaged, recent immigrant and first generation that leeches on it, makes a big difference in comparing family/household incomes with the indigeneous white household incomes. The size of the minority group also makes a big difference. You farted numbers without a single thought, I quoted them from the US bureau of census, not out of my a$$ fool
Very nice to note that you can copy paste photographs but can't think worth sh**. My numbers from the 2000 census were individual incomes, you put family/household incomes, asian households are larger with more people working per household, also comparison with ALL US households which include black and latino low income ones that drag the white total down is disingenuous- Also the percentage of foreign born and privilaged, recent immigrant and first generation that leeches on it, makes a big difference in comparing family/household incomes with the indigeneous white household incomes. The size of the minority group also makes a big difference. You farted numbers without a single thought, I quoted them from the US bureau of census, not out of my a$$ fool
#118 Posted by masadi on May 1, 2008 2:09:28 am
Kulharee writes "Nice (#59) Masadi Sahib, humans and chickens also share 99% similar genome "
Actually the figure is 60% similar genes are shared between human and chicken, sharing genes/evolutionary past is different to the genetic variation/gene expression discussed among humans in that article...fool
Actually the figure is 60% similar genes are shared between human and chicken, sharing genes/evolutionary past is different to the genetic variation/gene expression discussed among humans in that article...fool
#119 Posted by Kulharee on May 1, 2008 3:00:31 am
Masadi Sahib, I was more particularly talking about the rooster that cockadoodledos in the wee hours of the morning, just like a Moazin, and not any ordinary chicken. As I said earlier, you are way more expert in this area than any one of us, so you don’t need to be defending your views with silly stuff, like the one trick monkeys whose mantra is “Mirzais, Jews, Mirzais”.
I for one agree with most of what you have said, even if it is painful to swallow.
I for one agree with most of what you have said, even if it is painful to swallow.
#120 Posted by tahmed32 on May 1, 2008 4:17:37 am
#116 Did you salute before addressing Herr "superior race" Madani?
#121 Posted by tahmed32 on May 1, 2008 4:27:47 am
#101 hamidm: talking of breeds..what are your views on the breeding project at military dairy farms in chaklala where they have made a scientific breakthrough by breeding lotas that, like sunflowers, bend to the "rising sun"?
#122 Posted by tahmed32 on May 1, 2008 4:32:40 am
masadi: I am impressed by the MPH (Misery-filled Posts per Hour) you get per gallon. But I notice it is not up to par today. I hope you are not filling unwell.
#123 Posted by hamidm2 on May 1, 2008 4:47:11 am
Re: # 121
tahmed mian,
sigh! .... in case you haven't noticed i was right and you were wrong (as usual) ..... musharraf is still in charge, your beloved droopy-eyed cj turns out to be a crook who nobody wants to reinstate, and the unwashed masses don't seem to care ..... have you been keeping up with all the nasty deeds of the droop - like refusing javed hashmi's bail petition ? .....
president musharraf zindabad!
long live king zardari!
tahmed mian,
sigh! .... in case you haven't noticed i was right and you were wrong (as usual) ..... musharraf is still in charge, your beloved droopy-eyed cj turns out to be a crook who nobody wants to reinstate, and the unwashed masses don't seem to care ..... have you been keeping up with all the nasty deeds of the droop - like refusing javed hashmi's bail petition ? .....
president musharraf zindabad!
long live king zardari!
#124 Posted by bjkumar on May 1, 2008 4:58:41 am
Kulharee, Jackie Gleason was an Irish American actor from New York who (among other things) became famous for portraying the character of Ralph Kramden, New York City bus driver, in the early TV series entitled The Honeymooners.
#125 Posted by hamidm2 on May 1, 2008 5:04:20 am
hp mian,
..... you are right in that there is a lot of prejudice against the colored breed and i am afraid it is never going to go away .... real life is not like hollywood movies where the police chief or the captain of the spaceship is a strong and determined black guy who runs the show ..... real life is more like american idol where smiling simon is in charge and poor paula is allowed to make a fool out of herself while randy calls himself a dog ....
#126 Posted by arjun_5 on May 1, 2008 5:30:59 am
#117 Posted by masadi on May 1, 2008 1:57:17 am
My numbers from the 2000 census were individual incomes, you put family/household incomes, asian households are larger with more people working per household
this time you're pulling stuff out of Mills' ass...
you have no data to back that up....none...you do understand math, don't you? numbers and shit...
My numbers from the 2000 census were individual incomes, you put family/household incomes, asian households are larger with more people working per household
this time you're pulling stuff out of Mills' ass...
you have no data to back that up....none...you do understand math, don't you? numbers and shit...
#127 Posted by arjun_5 on May 1, 2008 5:42:49 am
inbred retard: who made up the rule that a certain number of generals have to be 4 stars or command the iraq war for anyone to safely say that there is no racism...
the fact that there are hardly any jews in the NFL proves that the NFL is anti-semitic? the fact that there are very few black QBs proves that the NFL is racist?
look..we get it...you pakis aren't successful..the income numbers clearly show that...but that doesn't mean the US is a racist society..you have your own inbreeding and propensity for islamic terrorism to blame for that...
the fact that there are hardly any jews in the NFL proves that the NFL is anti-semitic? the fact that there are very few black QBs proves that the NFL is racist?
look..we get it...you pakis aren't successful..the income numbers clearly show that...but that doesn't mean the US is a racist society..you have your own inbreeding and propensity for islamic terrorism to blame for that...
#128 Posted by ana on May 1, 2008 6:34:10 am
okay, class, one of your future missions, should you choose to accept it, is to read Michael Eric Dyson's "April 4th 1968", (for the unaware: the title is the date Martin Luther King Jr. was murdered) and then we can talk about it. . . someday.
On April 4, 1968, at 6:01 PM, while he was standing on a balcony at a Memphis hotel, Martin Luther King, Jr. was shot and fatally wounded. Only hours earlier King--the prophet for racial and economic justice in America--ended his final speech with the words, "I may not get there with you, but I want you to know tonight, that we as a people will get to the Promised Land."
Acclaimed public intellectual and best-selling author Michael Eric Dyson uses the fortieth anniversary of King's assassination as the occasion for a provocative and fresh examination of how King fought, and faced, his own death, and we should use his death and legacy. Dyson also uses this landmark anniversary as the starting point for a comprehensive reevaluation of the fate of Black America over the four decades that followed King's death. Dyson ambitiously investigates the ways in which African-Americans have in fact made it to the Promised Land of which King spoke, while shining a bright light on the ways in which the nation has faltered in the quest for racial justice. He also probes the virtues and flaws of charismatic black leadership that has followed in King's wake, from Jesse Jackson to Barack Obama.
Always engaging and inspiring, April 4, 1968 celebrates the prophetic leadership of Dr. King, and challenges America to renew its commitment to his deeply moral vision.
have a good day!
On April 4, 1968, at 6:01 PM, while he was standing on a balcony at a Memphis hotel, Martin Luther King, Jr. was shot and fatally wounded. Only hours earlier King--the prophet for racial and economic justice in America--ended his final speech with the words, "I may not get there with you, but I want you to know tonight, that we as a people will get to the Promised Land."
Acclaimed public intellectual and best-selling author Michael Eric Dyson uses the fortieth anniversary of King's assassination as the occasion for a provocative and fresh examination of how King fought, and faced, his own death, and we should use his death and legacy. Dyson also uses this landmark anniversary as the starting point for a comprehensive reevaluation of the fate of Black America over the four decades that followed King's death. Dyson ambitiously investigates the ways in which African-Americans have in fact made it to the Promised Land of which King spoke, while shining a bright light on the ways in which the nation has faltered in the quest for racial justice. He also probes the virtues and flaws of charismatic black leadership that has followed in King's wake, from Jesse Jackson to Barack Obama.
Always engaging and inspiring, April 4, 1968 celebrates the prophetic leadership of Dr. King, and challenges America to renew its commitment to his deeply moral vision.
have a good day!
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- muqaddam: Omar Abdulla is just... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- banneditem: Oye Ehtisham, meet us... Losing the Battle, Losing
- pinku: Indian society never persecuted... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- masadi: banneditem writes "Ras, In my... Three Cups of Tea
- masadi: He says a few... Three Cups of Tea
- masadi: BTW if by some... Three Cups of Tea
- masadi: So the CIA sends... Three Cups of Tea
- pinku: Good job by some... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content