unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

PPP Isn’t Convinced!

Ahmer Muzammil April 30, 2008

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#1 Posted by nasah on May 3, 2008 9:45:34 pm
Zardari is a compromised man once again -- a prisoner of his past habits -- Zardari has accepted so many -- NRO bribes -- from Madame Musharraf's House of Ill-Repute called the one-man presidency -- through one of his usual 'Pirzada' pimps now called called Qayoom -- from the obliging Judicial brothel called the Dogar Court -- so much so that any mention of a chaste Nov 2 SC -- freezes Zardari from his waiste down -- Zardari becomes unsure and unconvinced -- he can perform the restoration.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by izuber on May 3, 2008 10:34:42 pm
"My advice to Zardari would be to trust the mandate and assert. But like I said earlier, an elected PM was hanged in broad daylight in this country, his kids were shot dead at a point blank range by the infamous establishment so PPP’s paranoia has a valid basis and Muslim League N’s bravado is convenient."

Dear author
Your advice is addressed to the one who is at least a suspect to have conspired the point blank killing of two of the kids of that PM that was hung regardless of acquittal by the court on one of those killings and regardless of the recent killing of the other that has not been even investigated along those lines yet, while the third one has overdosed himself on contraband while away from the country.

It doesn't appear that the paranoia that you consider to be a valid basis and the bravado of convenience is about to gain soon.

In as much as the judiciary is concerned no daylight seems to be in sight while the valid base paranoia has already shown signs of intolerance when it comes to unshackled media.

There can't be anything sacred and holy where there is no sincerity to the public because public's mandate was for a change to the existing authority not to certain individuals or parties so to speak, people of Pakistan have always voiced for a change when they became distraught of an existing administration likewise they acted this time around, however it is a misconceived notion that the people necessarily were pointing towards the given individual to be a result of the change.

People of Pakistan are more interested in fulfilling their basic needs for food & shelter with dignity as well as enough electricity to keep them cool, and, not certain faces to run the affairs of Pakistan however what the people are once again facing is vice versa, and, their needs remain without being addressed or even more back breaking.

A common person of Pakistan does not care who it is that is running the affairs of nation as long as their needs are fulfilled be it Mr. M, Mr. Z or MR. N while its quite apparent that no one is there to gain anything from them other than their cronies while it is embedded in the creed of any ruler who took over Pakistan due to the mandate to continue fulfilling the illegitimate and illegal needs of their cronies.

the mandate was supposed to bring in someone who would provide for the needs of people and not meant to ignite a fire against our very own army taking in to account that "not all" in the army are corrupt as portrayed by the media while there is no mayee ka laal who can prove a penny's worth of stealing by (R-Gen.President Musharaf).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by sachasaint on May 3, 2008 11:20:23 pm
Hi people,
Let' all be grown ups.
Removing Musharraf, reinstalling a fired judges ( Mr. Chaudhry included) will not change the basic facts.
The country's problem's are going to be there. I dont see any signs that these politicians have any plans as to what to do. They are not showing leadership in moving the country ahead. They have had open field for the last 30 days and no concrete action has been taken to either inform us of grand vision (even an outline) or any steps to implement the actions to improve, economic, social, or civil issues.

Why dont we talk to these things..... let them play politics with the other issues.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by jayp on May 4, 2008 1:28:08 am
Re: # 2
izuber

"A common person of Pakistan does not care who it is that is running the affairs of nation as long as their needs are fulfilled be it Mr. M, Mr. Z or MR. N "

Give us a break, the average pakistanis prime concerns are veryt different. One of teh largest rally today in karachi was against soem stupid movie made by a ductch man, and not about the crime or pricve rise in pakistan.

The most violent campaign in pak history against teh govt was in response to the freeing of a few chinese captured b7y the jihadis.

The priority for the pakis is religion..full stop and and nothing else matters.

All that the impoverished FATA people are demanding is sharia.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by pavocavalry on May 4, 2008 2:20:03 am
all that this man says proves that the paki state is an anachronism and thus not permanent.a haven of crooks.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by zeemax on May 4, 2008 3:17:10 am
Here's an interesting excerpt from Zardari's BBC interview with Owen Benett Jones on 25 April:

OBJ: Jemima Khan wrote ... and I quote from her interview with President Musharraf. She says in the end:

"He shakes my hand. 'It will be the saddest day for Pakistan if Benazir's crooked widower is in power by Monday,'I say. As the President walks away, he looks back. 'At least we part on agreement.'"

Your comments please.

AZ: Well ... what can I say ... she is pretty.

OBJ: Pretty? Are you trying the charm offensive on Jemima Khan?

AZ: One should have pretty friends.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by rf786 on May 4, 2008 4:16:17 am
Dear Ahmer

"this status-quo in Pakistan (which in opinion is headed by Army and bureaucracy, landlords, industrialists, land mafias, stock-exchange magicians are there minions)"....

Basically interest groups who ocupy seats of power, if that is the defination then why ignore their biggest fan base i.e., Maulvis and their network of Maderssas one of the major power brokers and architects of this mutated ideology.

Having said that, all of the above are citizens of Pakistan and have the same right as that of any other citizen to exercise their economic, political and social rights. Is being rich a crime? or wearing a certain uniform makes you guilty. I am quite sure that is not what you meant, but that is the impression one would be forced to assume given your broad generalizations.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by hamidm2 on May 4, 2008 6:04:11 am


... so far, i am feeling vindicated ...... when bholay shah tahmed was going nuts over restoring the judiciary and getting rid of musharraf, i tried to tell him that the man was more than a match for the droopy eyed one and the politicians ........ the politicians are corrupt, incompetent and compromised - if not, they have the people's mandate to do whatever they want to do ....... all this stuff about the 'establishment' is sheer nonsense - the fault lies with the clueless unwashed masses and the leaders they have chosen ........

president musharraf zindabad !
sheikh rashid zindabad !

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by bulleya on May 4, 2008 8:16:41 am
...the person who has played his cards the best is, definitely, nawaz sharif......

he took an issue with which he had, absolutely, nothing to, and made it his own, i.e. the judiciary issue.......nawaz sharif and pml-n did nothing for the judiciary......infact, their rule was one of the worst for the judiciary and the media......

yet, nawaz sensed the public mood, on returning to pakistan, and immediately owned the juidiciary agenda.....

.the elections started right after he landed in pakistan.....he had a rump of his party left......his own political credibility was low as he had opted for saudi arabia and not for jail.......(for those who don't understand pakistani politics, going to jail is the ultimate badge of honor.......and running away the ultimate insult.........this is why gilani is prime minister, and javed hashmi won more seats than any other candidates)....

......on the other hand, ppp has been, traditionally, the anti-establishment party......it took on the establishment....its leader were targeted the most by musharraf......they spent the most time in jail....they are the party that did not break.......(unlike 2/3rd of the pml-n, which opted to join musharraf).....then they lost benazir, and many think the establishment targeted her....

.....yet zardari has fallen behind the public opinion......his party and its workers, have been dying to jump on the judiciary bandwagon......it is also dying to go after musharraf....

.....zardari, however, needs the current judiciary and musharraf to write off his cases........nawaz has already served the time for his........(as has zaradari and that too in jail, however, his cases remain undecided)......

zardari is not playing his cards correctly.....his party has the people's genuine vote.......people know he has spent his time in jail.......i don't think they will let anyone do anything to him, provided he does not fall behind on the judiciary issue, and on the musharraf issue......

nawaz has, in addition, forced his hand even in dubai....one can see easily that zardari has finally given into nawaz.......

pml-n 1 - ppp 0.......

nawaz is now the sharpest sword in pakistan's political armoury.......

i think zardari needs to back down and let gilani, aitezaz, khoro et al. take the lead.......they are the original ppp leaders and will take the party in the correct direction.......

anyways lets see what happens.......as for musharraf, if the govt. wants to impeach him tomorrow, there is nothing he can do.......the army is only powerful if the politicians are split.........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by hamidm2 on May 4, 2008 8:31:16 am
Re: # 9

bewakoof bulleya,

"if the govt. wants to impeach him tomorrow, there is nothing he can do.."

.... please explain how when he is sitting in the army house, the supreme court is stacked with his appointees, and the government has less than thirty seats in the senate ?

........ i think you should return to canada and open up a pan shop on gerard street where you can expound on your theories on international business and pakistani politics ..... maybe arjun can help you sell t-shirts .....
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by rf786 on May 4, 2008 10:15:36 am
Re: # 10

hamidm2

Its not Bulleya's fault, common public are driven by sound bites coming from the media, they do not have the capacity or the depth to understand complexities of politics. For the masses, its much easier to believe in the visible, the narrated, the tangible, immediate rather than the abstract. So please, do not condemn bulleya to the pan business maybe to the company of Gonglu Tinda Sharif.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by hamidm2 on May 4, 2008 10:40:30 am
Re: # 11

rf786,

.... i am not a big fan of musharraf - i think the man is despicable - but the politicians are a lot worse than him ...... they are blatantly lying to the public and trying to pull the wool over their eyes - it is they who are showing disrespect to the unwashed masses ..... musharraf's shennigans are transparent and he does it with 'khuli badmashi' challenging the people to 'poot lo jo pootna hai!" ...... i respect that more than the bs being dished out to the people by king zardari and gonglu shiraf of gowalmandi ........... shame on them and the unwashed masses who elected them !
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by rf786 on May 4, 2008 11:00:34 am
Re: # 12

hamidm2

I totally agree and share with you the same disgust towards our politicians, but show me one electable politician anywhere in the world who does not lie. That breed does not exists, its in their chromosomes to deceive, pander, slander, present themselves as the sole saviors, we all know thats not true, yet Ron Paul and Ralph Nader are nothing but side freak shows.

Point being, we need to emphasize on the process not on individuals. Pakistan needs a political process, granted it needs better politicians but that will come with time and nothing comes for free.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by sachasaint on May 4, 2008 11:38:51 am
My dear friends.

Lets hold these truths to be evident...
1) The politicians dont have answers to our problems.
2) We just want democracy. cuz supposedly, having general elections where people with the most muscle and money can gain access to power. There lack of ability to rule, create laws, order societies, or anyhting constructive is not important.
We discuss what they do in the streets after elections then what they dont do in parliament.

Our masses dont care about their future, therefore, they elect people who dont create a future.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by slyder. on May 4, 2008 11:46:57 am
#11 Posted by rf786 on May 4, 2008 10:15:36 am

["common public are driven by sound bites coming from the media, they do not have the capacity or the depth"]

altaph bai kay tapeworm, you have the depth and the capacity for this:

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by bulleya on May 4, 2008 12:21:31 pm
hamidm #10: ".... please explain how when he is sitting in the army house, the supreme court is stacked with his appointees, and the government has less than thirty seats in the senate ?"

hmm.....i think you need to stick with deaborn politics.....those of us sitting in pakistan, perhaps, have a better first hand understanding of what they are seeing in pakistan.....then again, you supported george bush as the next great hope for the usa (and the world)......so maybe dearborn isn't the correct place for you either...

musharraf, at the moment, is scared to address the parliament.......much less kick it out.....i think after the elections, if bilawal bhutto had clapped once, tens of thousands of people would have gathered around musharraf's house and taken him out....

1. "he is sitting in the army house"
....sitting in an army house doesn't immune one from impeachment.....kindly point out anything in the constitution which mentions the army house......

2. ".....the supreme court is stacked with his appointees,"
.......the supreme court also doesn't have anything to do with impeachment......it is a legally defined procedure, accepted by everyone.....

3. " and the government has less than thirty seats in the senate ?"
.....impeaching a president only requires a 2/3rd majority of the combined parliament - not a 2/3rd majority in each house......the current govt. has this 2/3rd majority.......

in addition, your friend nilofer, after enjoying the pleasures of power, has now formed a small forward bloc in the senate, and has joined the opposition marches against musharraf (though that is not needed for impeachment).....

2/3rd in both houses, separately, is only needed for amending the constitution.......not for impeaching the president....

i try my best to not abuse people on this site.....hence i will not call you an idiot.....but, hamidm mian, your lack of knowledge is really testing even my patience......i can tolerate abuse, but i cannot tolerate stupidity......

the only thing musharraf could do against impeachment, is to use 58(2)-b prior to impeachment.......however no one will bother about that......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #179 nasah
    #178 arjun_5
    #177 bubba
    #176 nasah
    #175 nasah
    #174 ahmedmadani
    #173 arjun_5
    #172 tahmed32
    #171 arjun_5
    #170 tahmed32
    #169 hamidm2
    #168 tahmed32
    #167 tahmed32
    #166 hamidm2
    #165 tahmed32
    #164 hamidm2
    #163 tahmed32
    #162 hamidm2
    #161 tahmed32
    #160 delhiwala
    #159 tahmed32
    #158 tahmed32
    #157 tahmed32
    #156 tahmed32
    #155 tahmed32
    #154 tahmed32
    #153 tahmed32
    #152 arjun_5
    #151 hamidm2
    #150 hamidm2
    #149 tahmed32
    #148 tahmed32
    #147 hamidm2
    #146 hamidm2
    #145 tahmed32
    #144 arjun_5
    #143 Naqshbandi
    #142 arjun_5
    #141 Naqshbandi
    #140 Naqshbandi
    #139 tahmed32
    #138 hamidm2
    #137 tahmed32
    #136 akcheema
    #135 tahmed32
    #134 tahmed32
    #133 tahmed32
    #132 hamidm2
    #131 akcheema
    #130 akcheema
    #129 akcheema
    #128 arjun_5
    #127 tahmed32
    #126 akcheema
    #125 tahmed32
    #124 arjun_5
    #123 tahmed32
    #122 akcheema
    #121 tahmed32
    #120 akcheema
    #119 tahmed32
    #118 tahmed32
    #117 zeemax
    #116 tahmed32
    #115 zeemax
    #114 arjun_5
    #113 tahmed32
    #112 akcheema
    #111 tahmed32
    #110 tahmed32
    #109 akcheema
    #108 hamidm2
    #107 akcheema
    #106 akcheema
    #105 hamidm2
    #104 majumdar
    #103 akcheema
    #102 hamidm2
    #101 hamidm2
    #100 HP
    #99 ana
    #98 arjun_5
    #97 arjun_5
    #96 HP
    #95 CreateAlpha
    #94 arjun_5
    #93 tahmed32
    #92 tahmed32
    #91 tahmed32
    #90 hamidm2
    #89 hamidm2
    #88 zeemax
    #87 Urstruly
    #86 arjun_5
    #85 Urstruly
    #84 hamidm2
    #83 hamidm2
    #82 zeemax
    #81 arjun_5
    #80 tahmed32
    #79 zeemax
    #78 majumdar
    #77 tahmed32
    #76 philosopher
    #75 ana
    #74 zeemax
    #73 hamidm2
    #72 hamidm2
    #71 hamza_yusufzai
    #70 ana
    #69 hamza_yusufzai
    #68 ana
    #67 tahmed32
    #66 zeemax
    #65 Urstruly
    #64 bulleya
    #63 hamza_yusufzai
    #62 Urstruly
    #61 Urstruly
    #60 zeemax
    #59 majumdar
    #58 zeemax
    #57 zeemax
    #56 sachasaint
    #55 hamidm2
    #54 zeemax
    #53 HP
    #52 Urstruly
    #51 zeemax
    #50 Urstruly
    #49 zeemax
    #48 zeemax
    #47 ajeya
    #46 rf786
    #45 Urstruly
    #44 tahmed32
    #43 NangaPir
    #42 Urstruly
    #41 ahmedmadani
    #40 bubba
    #39 hamidm2
    #38 bubba
    #37 Urstruly
    #36 zeemax
    #35 arjun_5
    #34 majumdar
    #33 hamidm2
    #32 pavocavalry
    #31 harish_hyd
    #30 zeemax
    #29 zeemax
    #28 bulleya
    #27 harish_hyd
    #26 majumdar
    #25 zeemax
    #24 zeemax
    #23 harish_hyd
    #22 rf786
    #21 izuber
    #20 hamidm2
    #19 bubba
    #18 arjun_5
    #17 allah_mian
    #16 bulleya
    #15 slyder.
    #14 sachasaint
    #13 rf786
    #12 hamidm2
    #11 rf786
    #10 hamidm2
    #9 bulleya
    #8 hamidm2
    #7 rf786
    #6 zeemax
    #5 pavocavalry
    #4 jayp
    #3 sachasaint
    #2 izuber
    #1 nasah

Latest Interacts

  • akcheema: I am still at... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • quin: Re: # 43 Your... Diabetes: Wrestling with a
  • mike195879: Tahmed: Thanks ... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • tahmed32: enjoyed chatting with you,... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • tahmed32: Ahmedi_Murad #179: yes indeed... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • Ahmadi_Mureed: Reply to # 173... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • BJ2: Re: # 174 Arjun, stop... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • SRK: hamidm2 "..... i tell you,... Muslim Ghettoisation

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Muslims in America
  • Anti-Americanism in Pakistan and the Taliban Menace
  • Muslim Ghettoisation
  • The Lame Duck Government
  • Solving Amarnath: A New Hope in Kashmir
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Dodging the Law of Extradition
  • The Bitter Taste of Milk: A Novel
  • Please spare the poor animals this Eid!
  • The Overlooked Problem of Pakistani Racism.
  • Gender and Literacy in Pakistan

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited