Juan Sandoval May 3, 2008
#193 Posted by majumdar on May 8, 2008 4:40:46 am
Nkg,
I never said that AS lobbied for it. It is just that Nobel guys were looking at a welfare economist to cover their faces after the LTCM fiasco.
(And what is this Mohammed Asadi folk?)
He is none other than our beloved Hazrat Masadi of chowk.com fame.
Regards
I never said that AS lobbied for it. It is just that Nobel guys were looking at a welfare economist to cover their faces after the LTCM fiasco.
(And what is this Mohammed Asadi folk?)
He is none other than our beloved Hazrat Masadi of chowk.com fame.
Regards
#194 Posted by VRV on May 8, 2008 4:53:15 am
Majumdar,
Nehru was a democrat but not a Stalinist. We in India use these terms very loosely - perhaps to sund like analysts.
Nehru was a democrat but not a Stalinist. We in India use these terms very loosely - perhaps to sund like analysts.
#195 Posted by VRV on May 8, 2008 4:55:01 am
If JNU is anathema then u'd find LSE to be equally loathesome. U dont kow how REDD the campus of LSE is. JNU's supposed to be modelled on JNU and it's just living to its creed.
Have pride and call urself a saffronite. Stop pretending like a soft liberal. Be true to urself.
Have pride and call urself a saffronite. Stop pretending like a soft liberal. Be true to urself.
#196 Posted by VRV on May 8, 2008 4:59:46 am
Pl dont say that Nobel Committe is like a govt office in Calcutta where u can influence a person or a group of ppl to award Nobel.
OMG, u r far dangerous than Kaalachakra.
OMG, u r far dangerous than Kaalachakra.
#197 Posted by majumdar on May 8, 2008 5:00:19 am
VRV,
(Nehru was a democrat)
Maybe you can explain the sacking of the Left govt in Kerala (1959?). Or the death of SP Mukherjee in govt custody.
(but not a Stalinist.)
Stalinist (almost) in economic policies.
(Stop pretending like a soft liberal.)
When did I say that I was a liberaloon? I am a (slightly) right of centre Hindoo. And the Sanghis with their mindless opposition to kanjarpana and cow slaughter are no more closer to my heart than the Gandhians are.
Regards
(Nehru was a democrat)
Maybe you can explain the sacking of the Left govt in Kerala (1959?). Or the death of SP Mukherjee in govt custody.
(but not a Stalinist.)
Stalinist (almost) in economic policies.
(Stop pretending like a soft liberal.)
When did I say that I was a liberaloon? I am a (slightly) right of centre Hindoo. And the Sanghis with their mindless opposition to kanjarpana and cow slaughter are no more closer to my heart than the Gandhians are.
Regards
#198 Posted by vengatramanan on May 8, 2008 5:02:55 am
Majumdar,
Can you enlarge on the motives, of the Stalinist historians, to play up the sectarian discrimination? To my knowledge they were more interested in propounding the efficacy of state owned/controlled businesses...
Can you enlarge on the motives, of the Stalinist historians, to play up the sectarian discrimination? To my knowledge they were more interested in propounding the efficacy of state owned/controlled businesses...
#199 Posted by majumdar on May 8, 2008 5:03:02 am
VRV,
Henry Kissinger got the Nobel because he was a great human being, right?
And isnt it quite curious how VS Naipaul got the Nobel in 2001 a month or two after 9/11. Maybe it was just a coincidence?
Regards
Henry Kissinger got the Nobel because he was a great human being, right?
And isnt it quite curious how VS Naipaul got the Nobel in 2001 a month or two after 9/11. Maybe it was just a coincidence?
Regards
#200 Posted by majumdar on May 8, 2008 5:04:31 am
Vengy,
(Can you enlarge on the motives, of the Stalinist historians, to play up the sectarian discrimination?)
Yes, the Stalinists needed to discredit the one thing that prevented India from going Red- Hindooism.
Regards
(Can you enlarge on the motives, of the Stalinist historians, to play up the sectarian discrimination?)
Yes, the Stalinists needed to discredit the one thing that prevented India from going Red- Hindooism.
Regards
#201 Posted by nkg on May 8, 2008 5:09:46 am
Enough debate...
Couple of drops of tears for Nirmala-didi. She had done quite a good job to reduce hiostility without causing any trouble to anybody...All Gandhians are not as bad/hyppocrete as Gandhi
Couple of drops of tears for Nirmala-didi. She had done quite a good job to reduce hiostility without causing any trouble to anybody...All Gandhians are not as bad/hyppocrete as Gandhi
#202 Posted by vengatramanan on May 8, 2008 5:10:47 am
Majumdar,
How would sectarian clash truths fecilitate Red-Hinduism?
How would sectarian clash truths fecilitate Red-Hinduism?
#203 Posted by majumdar on May 8, 2008 5:12:20 am
Nkg,
(Couple of drops of tears for Nirmala-didi.)
Yes.
(All Gandhians are not as bad/hyppocrete as Gandhi )
Yes, again.
Regards
(Couple of drops of tears for Nirmala-didi.)
Yes.
(All Gandhians are not as bad/hyppocrete as Gandhi )
Yes, again.
Regards
#204 Posted by majumdar on May 8, 2008 5:13:50 am
Vengy,
The Stalinists needed to discredit Hindooism so that Hindoos wud turn to Stalinism. That is why they had to show up Hindooism's faults - some true (casteism, misogyny) some false (sectarianism)
Regards
The Stalinists needed to discredit Hindooism so that Hindoos wud turn to Stalinism. That is why they had to show up Hindooism's faults - some true (casteism, misogyny) some false (sectarianism)
Regards
#205 Posted by nkg on May 8, 2008 5:15:52 am
Re: # 199
Majumder...
VSN was awarded with Man Booker prize ( UK) as early as 1971. You can not bring islamic angle at that time ( UK, USA were big supporter of islamists in Kashmir and Pakistan)...
Majumder...
VSN was awarded with Man Booker prize ( UK) as early as 1971. You can not bring islamic angle at that time ( UK, USA were big supporter of islamists in Kashmir and Pakistan)...
#206 Posted by vengatramanan on May 8, 2008 5:22:03 am
Re: # 204
Majumdar Dada,
That is preposterous...LOL...
Majumdar Dada,
That is preposterous...LOL...
#207 Posted by majumdar on May 8, 2008 5:22:20 am
Nkg,
Man Booker is Man Booker, Nobel is Nobel.
Regards
Man Booker is Man Booker, Nobel is Nobel.
Regards
#208 Posted by majumdar on May 8, 2008 5:23:09 am
(That is preposterous...LOL... )
Nope. That is Stalinism for you.
Regards
Nope. That is Stalinism for you.
Regards
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- _arjun38: aww..pakis don't like america... The Correct Turn
- hamidm2: Re: # 179 cheema sahib, ....... The Correct Turn
- KaalChakra: That won't happen because... The Correct Turn
- _arjun38: #191 Posted by... The Correct Turn
- KaalChakra: arjun, that is good... The Correct Turn
- KaalChakra: BTW, if the police... The Correct Turn
- _arjun38: You know what the... The Correct Turn
- KaalChakra: "As reported, some Policemen... The Correct Turn








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content