furkan ali July 14, 2008
#379 Posted by Shah2 on July 22, 2008 9:49:38 am
There is NO ummah chummah jummah
Its only Aga Mirzaee Bohra Shia Wahabi Bareilvi Rajneshi Ba ba Ram devi sects .No Hindu No muslim
Its only Aga Mirzaee Bohra Shia Wahabi Bareilvi Rajneshi Ba ba Ram devi sects .No Hindu No muslim
#378 Posted by Eklavya on July 22, 2008 9:43:27 am
sattar bhai, it very well might. If the fellow you worship is Allah, and if he is sending down propehts like mirza bhai sahib, then I obviously oppose this god, and his propeht mirza bhai sahib - a person who certainly does not deserve my respect at least (may be yours?).
If that means I will be destroyed, and Musims will be destroyed, while you will rule the world, hey, be my guest! :)
If that means I will be destroyed, and Musims will be destroyed, while you will rule the world, hey, be my guest! :)
#377 Posted by sattar2 on July 22, 2008 9:33:52 am
kaal bhai … you have a point there …
Ummah remains obsessed with Mirzaees … even as it continues to blow itself up. Perhaps this is the punishment for those who oppose Allah and His prophet: they gradually self-destruct … in more ways than one.
But this does not explain your paranoia … or does it? (lol)
Ummah remains obsessed with Mirzaees … even as it continues to blow itself up. Perhaps this is the punishment for those who oppose Allah and His prophet: they gradually self-destruct … in more ways than one.
But this does not explain your paranoia … or does it? (lol)
#376 Posted by Eklavya on July 22, 2008 9:05:58 am
sattar bhai, only if Muslims could be convinced with these smart alec comments and usual Mirzai trickery. :) :) :)
#375 Posted by sattar2 on July 22, 2008 8:31:15 am
kaal bhai … in other words you have nothing on Mirzaees besides your usual paranoia.
It reminds me of a bumper sticker … �just because I am paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get me� … (grin)
This fittingly describes your state of mind; not that there is anything wrong with it. So try to relax ...
Cheers.
+++
tahir Sahib,
Ummah and kaal bhai are eagerly waiting to hear about “Hashish in Qadian� and “Ahmadi-Jewish-British connection�. Don't keep them waiting; the suspense is too much ...
Ummah is blowing itself up and taking hostages in big red buildings ... and you want to expose Qadiannis (sigh).
Hello, is anybody home?
It reminds me of a bumper sticker … �just because I am paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get me� … (grin)
This fittingly describes your state of mind; not that there is anything wrong with it. So try to relax ...
Cheers.
+++
tahir Sahib,
Ummah and kaal bhai are eagerly waiting to hear about “Hashish in Qadian� and “Ahmadi-Jewish-British connection�. Don't keep them waiting; the suspense is too much ...
Ummah is blowing itself up and taking hostages in big red buildings ... and you want to expose Qadiannis (sigh).
Hello, is anybody home?
#374 Posted by masadi on July 22, 2008 3:07:37 am
In addition to #373, know that these are the kinds of people (Chowk Staff) that have kept our countries underdeveloped by playing the white man's game. Look how they shamelessly censor my articles, suppress my voice and alter the ilog system to display everyone's but my ilogs. This is clear injustice and people like these have kept corruption and underdevelopment in our countries. This site is a farce run by a-holes, and I do not need to waste my time here anymore. Get this sh** straight, a damn tragedy that people who can mnake a difference and have the will to do so are kept in check by these misearble sobs...
#373 Posted by masadi on July 22, 2008 3:02:50 am
By the way, verify for yourself, 5 minutes after I published my ilog, Ana published an ilog as well, her ilog is displayed on the FP, mine got lost in the ilog list....now can you see how these fools are discriminating against me??
#372 Posted by masadi on July 22, 2008 2:48:41 am
After my anti-army ilog went to the FP in the ilog list, chowk staff (tahmed & co, I speculate because of circumstantial evidence) altered how ilogs get displayed, as a result my ilog, new ones, vanish without a trace and a sharp decrease in readership. Here was the latest one
Articles Chowk Staff (tahmed & Co) have censoredPosted: Jul 22, 2008 Tue 02:41 am Views: 0 Interacts: 0 The following articles were submitted to Chowk Staff, but were censored with no explanation given. This censorship is going on because of a few members, namely tahmed, mohammad gill and Sohail the shrink. By doing so, just because they cannot argue with my anti-imperialist stance, which they support, they are trying to suppress my voice.
Recently a few other good members (those not yet on the dark side of the empire) Hurricane, Iron_mask, Zeemax and a few others started a publish masadi campaign.
The following articles were censored by chowk staff, they were subsequently published elsewhere or on my blog, use google to read them:
The Misadventures of the Pakistan Army
July 2008
This author's articlesThe US “World War� Factory
Sunday June 29th, 2008
Why Restoring the Deposed Judges is Priority #1 for Pakistan
Monday May 12th, 2008
Lost in Translation: The Myth of American Freedom
Thursday March 13th, 2008
Legitimizing a Farce
Sunday February 24th, 2008
Ahmedinejad Visits New York: The Iran Crisis in Context
Wednesday September 26th, 2007
Dogmatism, Modernization and Islam
Sunday June 24th, 2007
Factionalism, Social Movement Structure & Social Change
Wednesday June 13th, 2007
Exposing Al-Jazeera
Wednesday June 6th, 2007
Development and Underdevelopment
Thursday May 10th, 2007
Worthy & Unworthy Victims: The Virginia Tech Massacre
April 20, 2007
Overcoming the Colonial ’Subordination Model’ of Education: Reform in the Higher Education Sector of Pakistan.
Wednesday March 28th, 2007
As you can see they have been censoring any and every article I have submitted since March 2007 which is over a year and a half. Other members who are being robbed of meaningful discourse and knowledge by these few thugs should stand up to get rid of this censorship.
Thanks!
Articles Chowk Staff (tahmed & Co) have censoredPosted: Jul 22, 2008 Tue 02:41 am Views: 0 Interacts: 0 The following articles were submitted to Chowk Staff, but were censored with no explanation given. This censorship is going on because of a few members, namely tahmed, mohammad gill and Sohail the shrink. By doing so, just because they cannot argue with my anti-imperialist stance, which they support, they are trying to suppress my voice.
Recently a few other good members (those not yet on the dark side of the empire) Hurricane, Iron_mask, Zeemax and a few others started a publish masadi campaign.
The following articles were censored by chowk staff, they were subsequently published elsewhere or on my blog, use google to read them:
The Misadventures of the Pakistan Army
July 2008
This author's articlesThe US “World War� Factory
Sunday June 29th, 2008
Why Restoring the Deposed Judges is Priority #1 for Pakistan
Monday May 12th, 2008
Lost in Translation: The Myth of American Freedom
Thursday March 13th, 2008
Legitimizing a Farce
Sunday February 24th, 2008
Ahmedinejad Visits New York: The Iran Crisis in Context
Wednesday September 26th, 2007
Dogmatism, Modernization and Islam
Sunday June 24th, 2007
Factionalism, Social Movement Structure & Social Change
Wednesday June 13th, 2007
Exposing Al-Jazeera
Wednesday June 6th, 2007
Development and Underdevelopment
Thursday May 10th, 2007
Worthy & Unworthy Victims: The Virginia Tech Massacre
April 20, 2007
Overcoming the Colonial ’Subordination Model’ of Education: Reform in the Higher Education Sector of Pakistan.
Wednesday March 28th, 2007
As you can see they have been censoring any and every article I have submitted since March 2007 which is over a year and a half. Other members who are being robbed of meaningful discourse and knowledge by these few thugs should stand up to get rid of this censorship.
Thanks!
#371 Posted by masadi on July 22, 2008 2:45:57 am
As you can see some peon of the West hired by Chowk Staff and their paymasters is redflagging every post of mine, so they can pick on one and ban me again and then say, "oopps it was a red flagging accident"- I get your tricks, and believe me having me banned is more your loss than mine...
#370 Posted by masadi on July 22, 2008 2:44:09 am
faylasuf writes "p.s. Majumdar sahib, I was only wunderin y masadi is so impressed by you that he has eventually started giving your name as a reference :) ..."
Actually Majumdar understands better than many what I write, see how he explained my pov to Jay, and that is because he reads what I write unlike others who just want to argue for the sake of argumentation (like you are). You were equating hate of the tyrants of the military with the other hate you mentioned, there is qualitative difference between those, hating the anti people tyrants is actually loving the people that make this nation, it is loving the nation....get it?
Actually Majumdar understands better than many what I write, see how he explained my pov to Jay, and that is because he reads what I write unlike others who just want to argue for the sake of argumentation (like you are). You were equating hate of the tyrants of the military with the other hate you mentioned, there is qualitative difference between those, hating the anti people tyrants is actually loving the people that make this nation, it is loving the nation....get it?
#369 Posted by Faylasuf on July 22, 2008 2:04:46 am
Re # 333
Masadi sahib is talkin bout moral clarity! Hmmmm
Masadi, M not “trying to morally equate� any one, did u even try to read or understand what I had written? Or it’s only that you love to criticize and fight with every second person other then your own self?
p.s. Majumdar sahib, I was only wunderin y masadi is so impressed by you that he has eventually started giving your name as a reference :)
Masadi sahib is talkin bout moral clarity! Hmmmm
Masadi, M not “trying to morally equate� any one, did u even try to read or understand what I had written? Or it’s only that you love to criticize and fight with every second person other then your own self?
p.s. Majumdar sahib, I was only wunderin y masadi is so impressed by you that he has eventually started giving your name as a reference :)
#368 Posted by masadi on July 21, 2008 9:14:39 pm
BTW hamzaad unlike your kind and chowk staff with their 'impotent rage' the end result of which is picking on non-issues to censor me, my "rage" is full of substance and logically sound arguments that you all, the carriers of 'impotent rage' cannot match, hence your dimwitted posts or outright censorship...Saying I sound flimsy with no proof to back it up except non-issue BS, tell us all who te flimsy ones are...
#367 Posted by masadi on July 21, 2008 9:10:44 pm
hamzaad writes "Is this the same trick as saying 'gnight' and 'this is my last post' but not really?.."
I know you do not have the brains to argue any real issues with me so you pick on this nonsense. The g'night is never accompanied by 'this is my last post', if a thought comes to me after saying g'night I reserve the right to pen it, any problems? Regarding the "impotent rage", I think I already explained that, they have no route to express their rage to suppress the truth, even though they might try tricks to ban me, the truth has a way of getting out. If you do not like my polite "g'night" I have some other greetings reserved for fools like you. If you have problems with my ideas deal with them rather than pick on non-issues like 'you said g'bye but then posted again!" what kind of BS is that?
I know you do not have the brains to argue any real issues with me so you pick on this nonsense. The g'night is never accompanied by 'this is my last post', if a thought comes to me after saying g'night I reserve the right to pen it, any problems? Regarding the "impotent rage", I think I already explained that, they have no route to express their rage to suppress the truth, even though they might try tricks to ban me, the truth has a way of getting out. If you do not like my polite "g'night" I have some other greetings reserved for fools like you. If you have problems with my ideas deal with them rather than pick on non-issues like 'you said g'bye but then posted again!" what kind of BS is that?
#366 Posted by nb on July 21, 2008 7:58:47 pm
Kaal, you have still not answered my question. In what way are Ahmedis evil?
#365 Posted by adamkhan on July 21, 2008 7:07:04 pm
eklavya
foreskin is foreskin, there is no deception there... you are being way too friendly with the resident taliban... watch out for zeemax and his paaki... he will expect a shukrana plus mithai after he is done.
foreskin is foreskin, there is no deception there... you are being way too friendly with the resident taliban... watch out for zeemax and his paaki... he will expect a shukrana plus mithai after he is done.
#364 Posted by Eklavya on July 21, 2008 6:53:48 pm
adamkhan, yaar, both with foreskin and without foreskin are ok. But nobody wants people with deceptive skin around.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- CreateAlpha: Oh and one other... Uneven Democracy : The
- Skeptical: I really do not... Morality of Lawyers' Movement
- tahmed32: So the lawyer's movement... Morality of Lawyers' Movement
- CreateAlpha: I think Romair has... Uneven Democracy : The
- muqaddam: A simplistic view of... Crowning of a Crony
- nemesis3: #38 Posted by Pardesi... Uneven Democracy : The
- bulleya: anil#: ...can you define... Uneven Democracy : The
- harish_hyd: Today's Pakistan IS Jinnah's... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content