leenah Nasir March 28, 2009
#28 Posted by tahir on April 7, 2009 12:06:42 pm
All that goes under a certain banned name is automatically categorized as humour whether they love it or hate it.
:)
:)
#27 Posted by leenah on April 7, 2009 10:45:07 am
Out of the tags that mark this article, God knows I had never put up the tag 'humor'. However, the staff seems to have more foresight than me :)
#26 Posted by tahir on April 7, 2009 8:19:27 am
The identity crisis might be residing in those who don't get any interacts despite their best efforts to strip-tease on Chowq.
PS: Excuse me for this Miss Nasir.
PS: Excuse me for this Miss Nasir.
#25 Posted by quin on April 7, 2009 7:56:02 am
Re: # 24 thanks for reply.
Yes, as predicted at the end of the post #11.
To me sometime it looks as there is teenage type identity crisis with some of the interactors at Chowk.
Yes, as predicted at the end of the post #11.
To me sometime it looks as there is teenage type identity crisis with some of the interactors at Chowk.
#24 Posted by Fouz on April 7, 2009 7:37:11 am
ofcourse, quin, I totally agree. And here, unless I am much mistaken, is your favourite interactor again :) Time foer some serious entertainment:D
#22 Posted by tahir on April 7, 2009 6:51:14 am
Elsewhere in an I-Log:
"I must announce the sad demise of the Dancing Queen who died laughing out aloud on the Chowq floor!"
:)
:)
:)
"I must announce the sad demise of the Dancing Queen who died laughing out aloud on the Chowq floor!"
:)
:)
:)
#21 Posted by quin on April 7, 2009 6:26:15 am
correction re: # 20:
My own attitude is reflected in my post (#11)very clearly.
My own attitude is reflected in my post (#11)very clearly.
#20 Posted by quin on April 7, 2009 5:28:53 am
Re: # 19 I was referring to men's attitude in general which I have witnessed and was talking about it as a witness. My own attitude is reflected in my post (#18)very clearly.
#19 Posted by Fouz on April 6, 2009 11:17:27 pm
Re: # 18
Actually it was Parthaab (in No 7) who wanted to have the males speak up. I suppose he has posted something about people not respecting men's rights and stuff in another Article. One by Nida and where I believe the point was not about that. And this is no sissy stuff, Quin. Relationships are bound together not by one big rope but hundreds of little threads that join us in harmony. Just because men are still living in their caves, or equally importantly substantial efforts on their part has not been documented and highlighted effectively, does not mean we do not need to remind ourselves every so often of the importance of our balanced attitude in maintaining a relationship; and to treat women as equal partners in this game of life. Insecurities every one has: women more about their looks and hold over their husbands, men more about their maschismo and money and job. Meanwhile life goes on...:) I don't suppose there is any one person alive who, looking back at his/her relationship, wouldn't want to change one or the other aspect of their personality for good.
Actually it was Parthaab (in No 7) who wanted to have the males speak up. I suppose he has posted something about people not respecting men's rights and stuff in another Article. One by Nida and where I believe the point was not about that. And this is no sissy stuff, Quin. Relationships are bound together not by one big rope but hundreds of little threads that join us in harmony. Just because men are still living in their caves, or equally importantly substantial efforts on their part has not been documented and highlighted effectively, does not mean we do not need to remind ourselves every so often of the importance of our balanced attitude in maintaining a relationship; and to treat women as equal partners in this game of life. Insecurities every one has: women more about their looks and hold over their husbands, men more about their maschismo and money and job. Meanwhile life goes on...:) I don't suppose there is any one person alive who, looking back at his/her relationship, wouldn't want to change one or the other aspect of their personality for good.
#18 Posted by quin on April 6, 2009 4:39:10 pm
Re: # 14 Leenah, I read someone saying where are men or something like that (fouz?). sorry for my laziness, I did not check. on the other hand from my own experience with friends, I have seen that first hand and often. Once a friend has said, "this is sissy stuff" not realizing this "sissy stuff" is the glue that holds things together.
Things at Chowk tend to go off-tanget. People in their zeal forget the content of the article, and post all sorts of unrelated matter. As it is an unmoderated site that sometime leads to chain reaction. It is a sorry state.
I appreciated your decency in posting reply to all posts.
Things at Chowk tend to go off-tanget. People in their zeal forget the content of the article, and post all sorts of unrelated matter. As it is an unmoderated site that sometime leads to chain reaction. It is a sorry state.
I appreciated your decency in posting reply to all posts.
#17 Posted by tahir on April 6, 2009 5:35:03 am
Thank you Leenah for listening twice!
Please read my I-log
Please read my I-log
#14 Posted by leenah on April 5, 2009 10:55:18 pm
Re: #11
Thank you Quin.
Very truly, collective energy is what should be more than the sum of the pieces in a strong relation.
There is an interesting point though, on this discussion board, other than the writer, all the participants have non female IDs. So I believe its not too bad, when it comes to men's participation :)
leenah
Thank you Quin.
Very truly, collective energy is what should be more than the sum of the pieces in a strong relation.
There is an interesting point though, on this discussion board, other than the writer, all the participants have non female IDs. So I believe its not too bad, when it comes to men's participation :)
leenah
#13 Posted by quin on April 5, 2009 1:55:23 pm
By now I am pretty sure that this guy 'tahir' is implanted by Danish secret police (in conjunction with Germans) to defame Islam.
The way he is frantically behaving at chowk and picking up indiscriminate fights is just giving bad name to the calibre of Muslim interactors.
A revealing example is his fight with …mojo when …mojo posted protest for desecrating Quran by another interactor.
For this I heartily commend mojo, that in spite of his atheistic beliefs, he showed a great moral sense and strength of character. In contrast, this man with monkey at his back started attacking mojo only because mojo was doing it not for religious reasons but ethical reasons.
Since then, I am left with no respect for this man.
Actually, if I start thinking in terms of 'conspiracy theorists' I can pretty well say that this man is implanted by CIA or someone like that to give bad name to Islam.
Anyone who watches his behaviour and words (and wa'hyaat posts) can see what I mean. Displaying a behaviour of extrem bigotry and intolerance, he attacks anyone who brings some sense of reason to theology. He cannot stand a thought different from his own squinted vision, no matter if it is based on rich Islamic traditions.
In his last post now he is even hurling physical threats to me. If he is not a CIA agent then he is Swati or Chakwali talib in true sense. Thanks that he is not in my hometown otherwise I will report him to Police for hate crimes.
Tahir! it is you who keep coming across my way – not the other way round. It is you who do not spare a single opportunity to attack others. So don’t tell me not to cross your way. Just watch your own steps. Now, calm down and do something positive – don’t waste your time on ChowQ please.
The way he is frantically behaving at chowk and picking up indiscriminate fights is just giving bad name to the calibre of Muslim interactors.
A revealing example is his fight with …mojo when …mojo posted protest for desecrating Quran by another interactor.
For this I heartily commend mojo, that in spite of his atheistic beliefs, he showed a great moral sense and strength of character. In contrast, this man with monkey at his back started attacking mojo only because mojo was doing it not for religious reasons but ethical reasons.
Since then, I am left with no respect for this man.
Actually, if I start thinking in terms of 'conspiracy theorists' I can pretty well say that this man is implanted by CIA or someone like that to give bad name to Islam.
Anyone who watches his behaviour and words (and wa'hyaat posts) can see what I mean. Displaying a behaviour of extrem bigotry and intolerance, he attacks anyone who brings some sense of reason to theology. He cannot stand a thought different from his own squinted vision, no matter if it is based on rich Islamic traditions.
In his last post now he is even hurling physical threats to me. If he is not a CIA agent then he is Swati or Chakwali talib in true sense. Thanks that he is not in my hometown otherwise I will report him to Police for hate crimes.
Tahir! it is you who keep coming across my way – not the other way round. It is you who do not spare a single opportunity to attack others. So don’t tell me not to cross your way. Just watch your own steps. Now, calm down and do something positive – don’t waste your time on ChowQ please.
listing 1-16
1 2
Interact Index
Similar Articles
- Rolling Back By 42 Years Anand Mahajan
- An Encounter with Green Zone Living Mutaal Mooquin
- My Grandmother ~ Obituary salman Ali
- A PVC Pipe Relationship leenah Nasir
- Live In Prashant Bhatt
Swat: Paradise Lost
Latest Interacts
- jayp: Re: # 55 Good muslim... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
- jayp: Re: # 53 thanks madani... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
- Pardesi: Breaking News for ahmedmadani... Uneven Democracy : The
- a_r_j_u_n325: #94 Posted by... The Strange Case of
- a_r_j_u_n325: #95 Posted by... The Strange Case of
- RiazHaq: Re: # 90 bhs7:... The Strange Case of
- jrabamind: Dear Parthaab, The study referred... Communicating Medical Errors
- anil: Re: # 20 Dost sahib: “Indians... Uneven Democracy : The








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content