sufia ajaz May 2, 2009
#50 Posted by Skeptical on May 5, 2009 5:23:58 am
Re: # 39 Tareef is for your writing prowess not your behaviour. Your behaviour does not take away the fact that you are a very good writer. Baqi you like fighting with people here. Well I wont take the bait!!!!
#49 Posted by Skeptical on May 5, 2009 5:23:55 am
Re: # 39 Tareef is for your writing prowess not your behaviour. Your behaviour does not take away the fact that you are a very good writer. Baqi you like fighting with people here. Well I wont take the bait!!!!
#48 Posted by tahir on May 5, 2009 4:28:01 am
Re: # 46
Iron Task,
I've just been informed by the Sabz Pari that the conspiracy to invite me over to UP (to corrupt me instantaneously) was hatched by none other than the Indian Bengali lady doctor!
That a fact?
Iron Task,
I've just been informed by the Sabz Pari that the conspiracy to invite me over to UP (to corrupt me instantaneously) was hatched by none other than the Indian Bengali lady doctor!
That a fact?
#47 Posted by tahir on May 5, 2009 4:18:42 am
Re: # 46
Iffy Stiffy,
I never visit UN-PLUGGED; invite someone else.
Explain your reference to 'T' in #19, who is it?
Iffy Stiffy,
I never visit UN-PLUGGED; invite someone else.
Explain your reference to 'T' in #19, who is it?
#46 Posted by iron_mask on May 5, 2009 3:54:07 am
Tahir, HTF do you think you are the T in #19. You are one hell of a self-important blackhole.
apparently there is an invitation for you to vist the following http://chowk.com/unplugged/t/68397
for your delectation,(T)
apparently there is an invitation for you to vist the following http://chowk.com/unplugged/t/68397
for your delectation,(T)
#45 Posted by Dash_Dot on May 5, 2009 1:20:30 am
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_kV946Sjk7kc/RzVG1YJ9XCI/AAAAAAAADig/kL620ndV28A/s400/M allika_Sherawat_141.JPG
#44 Posted by tahir on May 5, 2009 12:58:41 am
Re: # 41
Dear CSCS,
"as long as you are stuck with this fetish of correcting female writers on Chowk you are welcome to try my patients."
Fetish? I was merely correcting FATish copy-pasters! And I have my own patients, I have no patience for the ones at your clinic.
Drool over the dancers; it's Dhuhr time here.
Being un-cool is the new cool way!
Dear CSCS,
"as long as you are stuck with this fetish of correcting female writers on Chowk you are welcome to try my patients."
Fetish? I was merely correcting FATish copy-pasters! And I have my own patients, I have no patience for the ones at your clinic.
Drool over the dancers; it's Dhuhr time here.
Being un-cool is the new cool way!
#43 Posted by Dash_Dot on May 5, 2009 12:56:54 am
this article and thread needs pictures....without the pictures, it is meaningless. Ms Ajaz might as well be writing about whatever....
Sherawat or shekhawhat....man she is good
Sherawat or shekhawhat....man she is good
#42 Posted by Fouz on May 5, 2009 12:20:14 am
Re: # 40
There you go again. Cardinal Sins? Right. Since when have they been demoted to a mere Cardinal. I thought they were Papal. Anyhow, as long as you are stuck with this fetish of correcting female writers on Chowk you are welcome to try my patients. Especially the cute red head with the herpes. (Damn! Now I am talking like you!)How un-cool is that!
There you go again. Cardinal Sins? Right. Since when have they been demoted to a mere Cardinal. I thought they were Papal. Anyhow, as long as you are stuck with this fetish of correcting female writers on Chowk you are welcome to try my patients. Especially the cute red head with the herpes. (Damn! Now I am talking like you!)How un-cool is that!
#41 Posted by Fouz on May 5, 2009 12:19:38 am
Re: # 40
There you go again. Cardinal Sins? Right. Since when have they been demoted to a mere Cardinal. I thought they were Papal. Anyhow, as long as you are stuck with this fetish of correcting female writers on Chowk you are welcome to try my patients. Especially the cute red head with the herpes. (Damn! Now I am talking like you!)How un-cool is that!
There you go again. Cardinal Sins? Right. Since when have they been demoted to a mere Cardinal. I thought they were Papal. Anyhow, as long as you are stuck with this fetish of correcting female writers on Chowk you are welcome to try my patients. Especially the cute red head with the herpes. (Damn! Now I am talking like you!)How un-cool is that!
#40 Posted by tahir on May 4, 2009 11:38:55 pm
Re: # 36
Dear civil SERVANT with cardinal sins,
Be open, address the one you accuse!
Dear civil SERVANT with cardinal sins,
Be open, address the one you accuse!
#39 Posted by tahir on May 4, 2009 11:36:55 pm
Re: # 35
Skep,
In these Sufi-Muhammad times, I'm simply telling these useless copy-pasters to reconsider before glorifying dancing girls (with high price tags) in articles that the ever-awake Chowq Stuffed find so appealing.
Is that extremism? Before the Tall Ebans knock at their doors, these hackers had better clean up their act. And this must be done while being conscious of Allah, not out of fear of the Tall Ebans.
Even the orthodox Jews complain about Madonna's disgusting stage behaviour!
PS: When will you give up this 'tareef'?
Skep,
In these Sufi-Muhammad times, I'm simply telling these useless copy-pasters to reconsider before glorifying dancing girls (with high price tags) in articles that the ever-awake Chowq Stuffed find so appealing.
Is that extremism? Before the Tall Ebans knock at their doors, these hackers had better clean up their act. And this must be done while being conscious of Allah, not out of fear of the Tall Ebans.
Even the orthodox Jews complain about Madonna's disgusting stage behaviour!
PS: When will you give up this 'tareef'?
#38 Posted by akcheema on May 4, 2009 10:32:42 pm
Re: # 37
[[he is just bitter about something which is not you (or your article) ]] ....
.... though some might argue those to be sufficient grounds independent of other factors!
[[he is just bitter about something which is not you (or your article) ]] ....
.... though some might argue those to be sufficient grounds independent of other factors!
#37 Posted by akcheema on May 4, 2009 9:56:23 pm
Re: # 23; bubbly
I never used impolite language ... simply stated facts as politely as I could (under the circumstances), as I saw them ... this may be a good write up but not something that should have been published on FP .... and I am sure your other work is far better ... an assumption on my part :)
I should apologise ... I know nothing of bollywood and didn't know this malika bibi was a real person (as became evident to me later) ... and I am not looking for any publicity (publicity for what exactly??)
and I mean it ... when I say that it is still a better read than all the randi rona about Pakistan
peace! and Khuda hafiz
PS: don't mind my dear friend Tahir ... he is just bitter about something which is not you (or your article)
I never used impolite language ... simply stated facts as politely as I could (under the circumstances), as I saw them ... this may be a good write up but not something that should have been published on FP .... and I am sure your other work is far better ... an assumption on my part :)
I should apologise ... I know nothing of bollywood and didn't know this malika bibi was a real person (as became evident to me later) ... and I am not looking for any publicity (publicity for what exactly??)
and I mean it ... when I say that it is still a better read than all the randi rona about Pakistan
peace! and Khuda hafiz
PS: don't mind my dear friend Tahir ... he is just bitter about something which is not you (or your article)
#36 Posted by Fouz on May 4, 2009 7:00:39 pm
What is all this crap about attacking the writer? No one is bound and gagged to read what she writes. Sadly, a catchy title on Chowk (especially with a female name appended to it)automatically means that people start venting out their frustrations. Whats wrong with the article? People actually read this stuff in glam magazines. My suggestion for the next piece, Bubbly: Kareena Kapoor, Paris Hilton of India,.:)
And this to a certain gentleman who shall remain anonymous: please put a lid on stupid puns. They are supposedly the lowest form of humour and yours are bad to begin wit!
And this to a certain gentleman who shall remain anonymous: please put a lid on stupid puns. They are supposedly the lowest form of humour and yours are bad to begin wit!
#35 Posted by Skeptical on May 4, 2009 6:38:05 pm
Re: # 34 Sir visit my introduction page and you will see that what i believe in.....In matters belonging to social realm, i try to not to fall into extremes...you may call it "confusion" since i am not yielding to totalarian thoughts but this is the way I am.
Once again I like your writing style but i can not agree 100% to your views. I regret that and i think a person of your stature and seniority should abstain from taking on young writers. Young writers need encouragement with constructive criticism not one sided mocking behaviour.
Once again I like your writing style but i can not agree 100% to your views. I regret that and i think a person of your stature and seniority should abstain from taking on young writers. Young writers need encouragement with constructive criticism not one sided mocking behaviour.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- a_r_j_u_n325: #95 Posted by... The Strange Case of
- RiazHaq: Re: # 90 bhs7:... The Strange Case of
- jrabamind: Dear Parthaab, The study referred... Communicating Medical Errors
- anil: Re: # 20 Dost sahib: “Indians... Uneven Democracy : The
- shankar: #93 Woah...the mullah said he... The Strange Case of
- guru: I mean http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqQJLOpKgRU... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
- guru: I do not want... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
- RiazHaq: It seems a little... Uneven Democracy : The








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content