An Encounter with Green Zone Living

I just noticed a formatting problem on the published article. Many of the quotation marks somehow are transformed to question marks. Editors, please correct.
Readers, sorry for the inconvenience.

Re#4: The stories at the GZL website are not meant to explore the theoretical basis and the clinical techniques of the GZL. This article attempts to make that knowledge accessible. It is an exploration of 'behind the scene' work that goes into such enterprises. The theory and practice of GZL as explained in this article is based on interviews and correspondence with the founders of GZL. Moreover, it was reviewed and agreed upon by them before publishing.
Only a dimwit cannot see difference between a story and a dissertation. I hope you are not the one; you might just have not read it carefully or you are just one of those who has nothing else to do but troll on the Internet with ever-changing nicks.
Go and be in your green zone. Staying in yellow and red for any length of time will damage your capacity of understanding further. (I said 'further' as your last sentence indicates your incapacity to put together a sentence coherently)
And what about new age BS question? no reply to that!

My judgment was directed at your article and not at GZL.
I believe your best course of action in you failed attempt to publicize this philosophy should have been to simply paste the
link www.greenzoneliving.ca because the "GREENZONE STORIES" on this website vividly describe what green zone living is all about,
how do you find your green zone, and why you should find you GZ?.
You on the other hand you provided us with a misleading article with convoluted ways of interpreting GZL. Simply put : it was full of unnecessary information for someone new to GZL.
with that i hope you will find your back into your green zone if i have regretful displaced you of it.

Re: # 2. What kind of link do you see between new age BS and the scientific principles/techniques of Green Zone Living as expounded in this article? You may have a point but you need to prove it. Otherwise, it seems either you have not read the article closely or you are unable to comprehend it properly. Hiding behind new nick to deliver unfounded judgments is tantamount to intellectual cowardice.

what kind of new age bull shit is this..

Besides reading his cool articles on chowk, I read a book analysing Sufist and Fundamentalist thought among muslims written by Dr. Khalid Sohail. It is a good read and the analysis of a psychiatrist strikes more familiarity and understanding.