Ali Hashmi June 19, 2009
#1 Posted by zarrar2 on June 19, 2009 7:09:48 pm
Brilliant view sir! I too was a fan and a follower of Mr. Khan. The stuff he says now on national television is only evidence of the fact that the man suffers from a possible personality disorder. Of course you might diagnose better.
#2 Posted by zarrar2 on June 19, 2009 7:09:50 pm
Brilliant view sir! I too was a fan and a follower of Mr. Khan. The stuff he says now on national television is only evidence of the fact that the man suffers from a possible personality disorder. Of course you might diagnose better.
#3 Posted by nb on June 19, 2009 10:24:54 pm
Interesting article. I heard nothing about this article from Imran, but Indians often make these facile and incorrect comparisons too. Imran seems to be fairly narcissistic. He should be on Chowk.
If family life is better in his view in the East, it comes at the price of oppression, particularly that of women, and people find this difficult to accept. If anything, I find Easterners more driven by materialism than Westerners now, which is not hard when you have not had your basic needs met.
If family life is better in his view in the East, it comes at the price of oppression, particularly that of women, and people find this difficult to accept. If anything, I find Easterners more driven by materialism than Westerners now, which is not hard when you have not had your basic needs met.
#4 Posted by Fouz on June 20, 2009 2:50:48 am
Imran Khan should have limited himself to cricket and later on his cancer hospital. That would have earned him a lot of respect and perhaps then his musings on life and philosophy would have been taken a bit more seriously. He ventured out on the wrong foot, without his guard and with no idea of what he was aiming at. No wonder the crowd is somewhat uncharitable.
#5 Posted by TehsinA on June 20, 2009 6:15:01 am
Hashmi Sahib:
Very well done! We need more people to take up the cause of history and philosophy, two disciplines which have been decimated in Muslim lands as they directly challenge monolithic indoctrinations essential for religious orthodoxy and regressive regimes.
Very well done! We need more people to take up the cause of history and philosophy, two disciplines which have been decimated in Muslim lands as they directly challenge monolithic indoctrinations essential for religious orthodoxy and regressive regimes.
#6 Posted by kawish on June 20, 2009 6:15:08 am
A very good article, very factual. I hope Pakistan comes out of its dark ages and shine like the star it is.
#7 Posted by hashmiali on June 20, 2009 6:41:10 am
Re: # 1, thanks zarrar2. As far as 'diagnosing' Imran Khan, I try not to get too carried away with labels. Besides, a person's actions speak louder than any words, don't you think?
#8 Posted by hashmiali on June 20, 2009 6:44:16 am
Re: # 3, good point about 'Eastern family life', nb. Also, if one uses the conventional definition of materialism i.e. grasping and thirsting after material things, poorer countries like Pakistan have more people in the grip of this since, as you correctly point out, they do not have their basic needs met. I wrote about this a while ago in another article here. Glad you liked the article.
#9 Posted by hashmiali on June 20, 2009 6:49:44 am
Re: # 5, thanks TehsinA. Philosophy, history, the history of philosophy and other such esoteric subjects have been a passion of mine since a young age. Unfortunately, I am now trapped in a psychiatrist's life ;-)
It's not just in 'Muslim lands' that education and knowledge is being progressively narrowed down to the strictly utilitarian i.e. whatever is of immediate use. It also follows logically that in capitalist societies (including the US), utility is defined by whether or not something makes a monetary profit. If so, good enough, if not, it is disallowed/discouraged.
I find it sad that so many young people are being funnelled into learning just about business/finance/commerce etc etc with no encouragement to read the humanities, philosophy, literature, art etc since those can lead to 'dangerous' ideas. I'm just trying to do my humble part in undermining the official dogma.
Thanks for the feedback.
It's not just in 'Muslim lands' that education and knowledge is being progressively narrowed down to the strictly utilitarian i.e. whatever is of immediate use. It also follows logically that in capitalist societies (including the US), utility is defined by whether or not something makes a monetary profit. If so, good enough, if not, it is disallowed/discouraged.
I find it sad that so many young people are being funnelled into learning just about business/finance/commerce etc etc with no encouragement to read the humanities, philosophy, literature, art etc since those can lead to 'dangerous' ideas. I'm just trying to do my humble part in undermining the official dogma.
Thanks for the feedback.
#10 Posted by RiazHaq on June 20, 2009 7:29:08 am
While I disagree with Imran on his stand regarding the Taliban and his right-wing politics in general, I think there is some truth what he says about eastern values. Having lived in the West for almost all of my adult life, I find that Asians have much stronger family connections, much lower divorce rates, higher education and incomes, an admirable culture of achievement and caring for each other in America.
I see Chinese, Indians and Pakistanis and other Asians with good work ethics outperforming their native white counterparts in almost all fields of endeavor in the United States while maintaining strong family ties at the same time.
Riaz Haq, PakAlumni Worldwide
I see Chinese, Indians and Pakistanis and other Asians with good work ethics outperforming their native white counterparts in almost all fields of endeavor in the United States while maintaining strong family ties at the same time.
Riaz Haq, PakAlumni Worldwide
#11 Posted by bubba on June 20, 2009 7:43:30 am
Ali Hashimi sahib,
Are you using a reverse psychology by introducing a failed person turned politician? Some people could frame this as an "earned advertising," but I wouldn't.
I know, i know, pakis have this uncanny nature of getting acceptance by creating a hulla-gulla atmosphere, even on a web-site.
Are you using a reverse psychology by introducing a failed person turned politician? Some people could frame this as an "earned advertising," but I wouldn't.
I know, i know, pakis have this uncanny nature of getting acceptance by creating a hulla-gulla atmosphere, even on a web-site.
#12 Posted by GT on June 20, 2009 8:50:48 am
"I see Chinese, Indians and Pakistanis and other Asians with good work ethics outperforming their native white counterparts in almost all fields of endeavor in the United States..." Riaz Haq
That says a lot about your ability to "see".
That says a lot about your ability to "see".
#13 Posted by malikrashid on June 20, 2009 10:40:44 am
A good read. Imran Khan would be better off without publicising his ideas on society and life. I think his decision to join politics and choosing handlers like Hamid Gul landed him in a hardplace. The man is physically endowed with good looks and athleticsm but he has failed as a politician for bad alliances and lack of education.He shows no signs of coming out of this dilemma.
#14 Posted by banjara286 on June 20, 2009 7:38:07 pm
Re: # 5 tehsin sb,
history is, no doubt, a valuable resource. but one can interpret it the way they like to suit their own agenda; a bit like statistics in that regard, don't u think?
history is, no doubt, a valuable resource. but one can interpret it the way they like to suit their own agenda; a bit like statistics in that regard, don't u think?
#15 Posted by vanguard on June 21, 2009 12:15:30 am
I am not a follower of Imran Khan but these articles in last couple of weeks have really started me thinking about him.
He did not turnout to be a lota when Musharraf offered him premiership and even admitted that it was a mistake (which the politicians nor the citizens of this country ever do and god forbid if Army ever stoop so low as to even realize that they have committed a mistake), promised to build a world class cancer hospital, not only built it but is also not micromanaging it rather has put in place a system to run it efficiently... That is a huge achievement even by world standards and that says a lot about his character...a feat no other politician nor army has or can replicate...
This is the umpteenth article I am reading about Imran Khan in a fortnight and I am amazed that all of them have the same thing to say...his article of 2002 (could not find anything newer to complain about) and his anti-military operation stance...If you don't like his views, ignore him
Let me count the ways people have criticized Imran Khan in last fortnight on his anti military stance (not on the base of his arguments but on the base of his 2002 article) ...the sheer opposition has made me feel that there is more to it than meets the eyes
1. This pathetic article by the graduate of KEMC and later turned psychiatrist. (Theory of Evolution is a "theory" and not a fact...it might explain a lot of things but still remains a theory and any one is free to reject it as long as it remains a theory....like a big bang theory, superstring theory, inflationary universe theory, steady state universe theory...what is gravity by the way since you raised the issue? do two bodies exert forces on each other? is it caused by gravitons exchange? or by a bend in space-time? or is it something else? A stupid example given to debunk a stupid argument!!!
2. Last week in Daily Times by former Dean of social sciences of Quaid-e-Azam Uni
3. Last week again in Daily Times by Samad Khurram who is undergrad student at Harvard and reached fame by protesting against drone attacks and refusing to be honored by US Ambassador
4. An article on Pakistaniat.com why I dont like Imran Khan
5. An article by Rauf Klasra and Haroon (whats his name) from Daily Jang so oft quoted by Catchy or Cachy and Dawa-i-Dil
6. NFP on his blog as well as article in DAWN directly and indirectly
7. Where I stand article by Imran Khan on Pak Tea House taken from of all the places from a Bangladeshi website
8. This has been quoted a lot in posts and comments: somebody who had it from somebody who had it from somebody that Imran Khan tried to assault Hoodbhoy on live TV once the transmission stopped
All of this in last two weeks. He has really gotten people's goat this time. Or has he become to big to ignore suddenly.
We have so many other people to write about and who actually matter in current scheme of things such as but we are ignoring them...
1. Altaf Hussain (let us not start on that)
2. Nawaz Sharif (who fled to Saudi and still can't come around to admitting that it was a 10 year exile rather than five year despite his signature on the contract).
3. Asif Zardari (Mr 10 percent)
4. Musharraf who build a million dollar home with million pound fixtures (independent.co.uk) in chak shehzad, has not paid his hundreds of thousand rupees electricity bills and the meter that is currently installed at his house charges him FATA rate (the News) and sells Pakistani citizens to CIA for bounty money and when people are massacred in broad daylight in Karachi on May 12, from behind a bullet proof shield in Islamabad proclaims to a crowd collected by promising them food and 300 rupees from all over Punjab that "today we have demonstrated street power in Karachi"
5. The religious lot of MMA
Politicians die their own death when no one listens to them. Left on his own, he would have been forgotten. But these columnists and articles keep bringing him up and breath new life to him...I wonder why??? What has happened in last two weeks to bring about so many articles??? Any ideas
He did not turnout to be a lota when Musharraf offered him premiership and even admitted that it was a mistake (which the politicians nor the citizens of this country ever do and god forbid if Army ever stoop so low as to even realize that they have committed a mistake), promised to build a world class cancer hospital, not only built it but is also not micromanaging it rather has put in place a system to run it efficiently... That is a huge achievement even by world standards and that says a lot about his character...a feat no other politician nor army has or can replicate...
This is the umpteenth article I am reading about Imran Khan in a fortnight and I am amazed that all of them have the same thing to say...his article of 2002 (could not find anything newer to complain about) and his anti-military operation stance...If you don't like his views, ignore him
Let me count the ways people have criticized Imran Khan in last fortnight on his anti military stance (not on the base of his arguments but on the base of his 2002 article) ...the sheer opposition has made me feel that there is more to it than meets the eyes
1. This pathetic article by the graduate of KEMC and later turned psychiatrist. (Theory of Evolution is a "theory" and not a fact...it might explain a lot of things but still remains a theory and any one is free to reject it as long as it remains a theory....like a big bang theory, superstring theory, inflationary universe theory, steady state universe theory...what is gravity by the way since you raised the issue? do two bodies exert forces on each other? is it caused by gravitons exchange? or by a bend in space-time? or is it something else? A stupid example given to debunk a stupid argument!!!
2. Last week in Daily Times by former Dean of social sciences of Quaid-e-Azam Uni
3. Last week again in Daily Times by Samad Khurram who is undergrad student at Harvard and reached fame by protesting against drone attacks and refusing to be honored by US Ambassador
4. An article on Pakistaniat.com why I dont like Imran Khan
5. An article by Rauf Klasra and Haroon (whats his name) from Daily Jang so oft quoted by Catchy or Cachy and Dawa-i-Dil
6. NFP on his blog as well as article in DAWN directly and indirectly
7. Where I stand article by Imran Khan on Pak Tea House taken from of all the places from a Bangladeshi website
8. This has been quoted a lot in posts and comments: somebody who had it from somebody who had it from somebody that Imran Khan tried to assault Hoodbhoy on live TV once the transmission stopped
All of this in last two weeks. He has really gotten people's goat this time. Or has he become to big to ignore suddenly.
We have so many other people to write about and who actually matter in current scheme of things such as but we are ignoring them...
1. Altaf Hussain (let us not start on that)
2. Nawaz Sharif (who fled to Saudi and still can't come around to admitting that it was a 10 year exile rather than five year despite his signature on the contract).
3. Asif Zardari (Mr 10 percent)
4. Musharraf who build a million dollar home with million pound fixtures (independent.co.uk) in chak shehzad, has not paid his hundreds of thousand rupees electricity bills and the meter that is currently installed at his house charges him FATA rate (the News) and sells Pakistani citizens to CIA for bounty money and when people are massacred in broad daylight in Karachi on May 12, from behind a bullet proof shield in Islamabad proclaims to a crowd collected by promising them food and 300 rupees from all over Punjab that "today we have demonstrated street power in Karachi"
5. The religious lot of MMA
Politicians die their own death when no one listens to them. Left on his own, he would have been forgotten. But these columnists and articles keep bringing him up and breath new life to him...I wonder why??? What has happened in last two weeks to bring about so many articles??? Any ideas
#16 Posted by Senna on June 21, 2009 3:58:09 am
Make Imran live in Dhravi as in Slum Dog Milioneer .He resounds like Bollywood movies made in the same metropolis..Mere desh ke dharti ..ala Manoj Maine Bharat Kumar .Incidently both these chaps are demagogue deriving Material comfort by these rhetoric .
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- harish_hyd: Today's Pakistan IS Jinnah's... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
- harish_hyd: If Karzai is a... Crowning of a Crony
- Pardesi: #36 - Your health... Uneven Democracy : The
- harish_hyd: #16 Posted by Goldfinger I... The Jehadi Frankenstein
- SPY: Re: # 49 ahmedmadani:... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
- bhs75: well if NAB was... NRO Is Just a
- bhs75: Re: # 96 let me... The Strange Case of
- SPY: Re: # 50 ahmedmadani:... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content