Mofeez Murtaza January 28, 1999
#12 Posted by rehanrizvi on January 29, 1999 11:21:33 am
Re: predictions
Remember guys, this is cricket. It ain`t over till it`s over, or until Inzi sings, whichever comes first. You need to replace your crystal ball Saad, it seems to have become a bit foggy, eh!
Re: Waqar
He`s still got at least four or five years left in him. I`d like to see him bowl as long as he is able to do deliver the goods.
Re: the usual wickets
One thing I just can`t understand about India/Pakistan, we can make nukes all right, why the heck can`t we make good wickets? What kind of a super-genius and a super-computer do you need to make a good, reliabel test class wicket?
Re: records posted in the replies
I think anyone who`s a least bit interested in cricket should probably know by now that you can view any records of any kind related to cricket at either Cricinfo, www.cricket.org, or www.Khel.com. I personally like the Khel.com better. It`s database is faster and more user-friendly. The point is, without proper formatting, the records are not legible and there`s no need to post them here at such great lengths. Sorry, but that`s just my opinion.
Rehan.
Remember guys, this is cricket. It ain`t over till it`s over, or until Inzi sings, whichever comes first. You need to replace your crystal ball Saad, it seems to have become a bit foggy, eh!
Re: Waqar
He`s still got at least four or five years left in him. I`d like to see him bowl as long as he is able to do deliver the goods.
Re: the usual wickets
One thing I just can`t understand about India/Pakistan, we can make nukes all right, why the heck can`t we make good wickets? What kind of a super-genius and a super-computer do you need to make a good, reliabel test class wicket?
Re: records posted in the replies
I think anyone who`s a least bit interested in cricket should probably know by now that you can view any records of any kind related to cricket at either Cricinfo, www.cricket.org, or www.Khel.com. I personally like the Khel.com better. It`s database is faster and more user-friendly. The point is, without proper formatting, the records are not legible and there`s no need to post them here at such great lengths. Sorry, but that`s just my opinion.
Rehan.
#11 Posted by RanaRansher on January 29, 1999 11:07:56 am
The pitch is turning more and more. It is crumbling which will continue to be a nightmare for the batsman owing to its uneven bounce. India batting second on a crumbling track puts the odds in favour of Pakistan, something that a first innings lead would have countered.
In any case, If Pak put up anything close to 250 - 300 India will have a real tough time overhauling that on this track. What with both Akram and Saqlain coming up with some superlative bowling.
Tomorrow morning will once again be a decisive period.
Look forward to reading your report on it Mofeez
regards
In any case, If Pak put up anything close to 250 - 300 India will have a real tough time overhauling that on this track. What with both Akram and Saqlain coming up with some superlative bowling.
Tomorrow morning will once again be a decisive period.
Look forward to reading your report on it Mofeez
regards
#10 Posted by shafqat on January 29, 1999 11:02:05 am
Afrasiyab and others,
The spirit is back! I can hear it, I can feel it!
Must`ve been some sight, seeing Tendulkar out to Saqlain for 0. What a deliciously placed match. This is headed for a great ending.
OK, so India 254 all out and Pakistan 34 for 1 at close of day 2.
Predictions:
Pakistan 188 all out (Salim Malik 50+)
India 143 all out (Tendulkar 50+)
Pakistan win by 29 runs.
Saad
PS: Can someone please send over Saqlain`s feet to Boston ? There`s quite a few people over here who need to kiss them.
The spirit is back! I can hear it, I can feel it!
Must`ve been some sight, seeing Tendulkar out to Saqlain for 0. What a deliciously placed match. This is headed for a great ending.
OK, so India 254 all out and Pakistan 34 for 1 at close of day 2.
Predictions:
Pakistan 188 all out (Salim Malik 50+)
India 143 all out (Tendulkar 50+)
Pakistan win by 29 runs.
Saad
PS: Can someone please send over Saqlain`s feet to Boston ? There`s quite a few people over here who need to kiss them.
#9 Posted by faraz on January 29, 1999 8:17:29 am
This is getting interesting.
First of all, Afridi needs to play a good innings. There is plenty of time so the batsman need to think about preserving their wicket first and scoring runs second. The wicket is only going to turn more as the match progresses.
If Pakistan can give India a target of at least 230-250, they bowl them out and win the match.
Tendu out for a duck; I wish I could have seen that.
First of all, Afridi needs to play a good innings. There is plenty of time so the batsman need to think about preserving their wicket first and scoring runs second. The wicket is only going to turn more as the match progresses.
If Pakistan can give India a target of at least 230-250, they bowl them out and win the match.
Tendu out for a duck; I wish I could have seen that.
#8 Posted by afrasiyab on January 29, 1999 6:11:10 am
Saad,
Looks like this is after all going to be an interesting one. Nopes, India did not get to 450. Azhar, was out for 11. Maybe I should not be wagging my finger at you since my own prediction is of a draw, which, after today, does not seem likely. It is still possible, though that this wicket may become more comfortable for the batsmen and we might see some lengthy stands from the Pakistanis and the Indians.
Cricket, who knows.
Looks like this is after all going to be an interesting one. Nopes, India did not get to 450. Azhar, was out for 11. Maybe I should not be wagging my finger at you since my own prediction is of a draw, which, after today, does not seem likely. It is still possible, though that this wicket may become more comfortable for the batsmen and we might see some lengthy stands from the Pakistanis and the Indians.
Cricket, who knows.
#7 Posted by SS on January 29, 1999 2:48:38 am
Mofeez wrote : ``The day end score of 48 without loss off 8 overs is typical of the Pakistan fast bowlers on placid tracks ... When the ball becomes older they will be tough to handle and with the morning dew, the pre-lunch session tomorrow would dictate the day and the test match.``
Prophetic!! India is 130 for 4 around lunch. Akram has struck and Tendy was ``saq-mushed`` on ball 3. Azhar who?
Prophetic!! India is 130 for 4 around lunch. Akram has struck and Tendy was ``saq-mushed`` on ball 3. Azhar who?
#6 Posted by afrasiyab on January 29, 1999 2:39:53 am
Re: Saad
You are going out on a limb here and so am I.
My prediction is that both teams will play long 2nd innings. This test match may end up as a draw.
You are going out on a limb here and so am I.
My prediction is that both teams will play long 2nd innings. This test match may end up as a draw.
#5 Posted by shafqat on January 28, 1999 10:33:47 pm
OK, so Pakistan 238 and India 48 for 0 at end of day 1.
Prediction:
India 433 for 9 declared (Azharuddin century)
Pakistan 130 all out (Salim Malik 50+)
Pakistan lose by innings and 62 runs.
Saad
Prediction:
India 433 for 9 declared (Azharuddin century)
Pakistan 130 all out (Salim Malik 50+)
Pakistan lose by innings and 62 runs.
Saad
#4 Posted by Jawwad on January 28, 1999 8:47:41 pm
Mofeez,
Good artcile once again. A very good insight to what`s happened in the first day.
I myself was disappointed with the team selection. I think that Mushtaq Ahmed had a sore throat or something so he couldnt play as he was not 100% fit. But same was with Ijaz he was also on the injury list. So i dont know why they played Ijaz and not Mushi.
I think that Yousuf is becoming like Miandad in the middle order... There is not much differece as Miandad used to come in the top order... when the score was like 7-2.. now Yousuf is coming in the middle order when its 50-4 or something of that sort... So Yousuf is coming to the rescue everytime our team is in dire straits.
My cousin had played with Shoaib Akhtar and Yousuf Youhana... He said that Shoaid Akhtar is hell of a fast bowler... and Yousuf is a technically sound batsman...
Lets see what happens in the second day.
---Jawwad
Good artcile once again. A very good insight to what`s happened in the first day.
I myself was disappointed with the team selection. I think that Mushtaq Ahmed had a sore throat or something so he couldnt play as he was not 100% fit. But same was with Ijaz he was also on the injury list. So i dont know why they played Ijaz and not Mushi.
I think that Yousuf is becoming like Miandad in the middle order... There is not much differece as Miandad used to come in the top order... when the score was like 7-2.. now Yousuf is coming in the middle order when its 50-4 or something of that sort... So Yousuf is coming to the rescue everytime our team is in dire straits.
My cousin had played with Shoaib Akhtar and Yousuf Youhana... He said that Shoaid Akhtar is hell of a fast bowler... and Yousuf is a technically sound batsman...
Lets see what happens in the second day.
---Jawwad
#3 Posted by RanaRansher on January 28, 1999 6:21:55 pm
re: Team selection
I believe Mushtaq Ahmad is out with a stiff neck, he reportedly went in for some MRIs on Wednesday.
In the Indian line-up the `left arm slow orthodox` spinner you refer to is Sunil Joshi and not Raju.
regards
I believe Mushtaq Ahmad is out with a stiff neck, he reportedly went in for some MRIs on Wednesday.
In the Indian line-up the `left arm slow orthodox` spinner you refer to is Sunil Joshi and not Raju.
regards
#2 Posted by shafqat on January 28, 1999 6:05:25 pm
Thanks for the report, Mofeez. It is very welcome. Look forward to more.
What is less welcome, is the 238. I mean, what the ... ??! Does anyone know if the umpires are both neutral, or is one Indian ? The team is probably also still reeling from the match-fixing and betting scandals. Wasim Akram himself has been widely pointed out as being highly mulavvis in this corruption (don`t mean to spread innuendo, though - please correct me if this is still in the rumor stage). On top of that, we have to contend with the batting famine that has been with Pakistan cricket for a few years now. There simply is no serious batting talent left in the side.
Anyway, perhaps the poor performance is a good thing. If Pakistan starts getting anywhere close to victory, violence may erupt.
And so what if we lose, koeey baat nahiN yaar. Pakistan has won two tests in India, India has never won in Pakistan. So there.
Saad :) :)
What is less welcome, is the 238. I mean, what the ... ??! Does anyone know if the umpires are both neutral, or is one Indian ? The team is probably also still reeling from the match-fixing and betting scandals. Wasim Akram himself has been widely pointed out as being highly mulavvis in this corruption (don`t mean to spread innuendo, though - please correct me if this is still in the rumor stage). On top of that, we have to contend with the batting famine that has been with Pakistan cricket for a few years now. There simply is no serious batting talent left in the side.
Anyway, perhaps the poor performance is a good thing. If Pakistan starts getting anywhere close to victory, violence may erupt.
And so what if we lose, koeey baat nahiN yaar. Pakistan has won two tests in India, India has never won in Pakistan. So there.
Saad :) :)
#1 Posted by afrasiyab on January 28, 1999 12:25:27 pm
I could not believe the irresponsibility of the Pakistani batsmen on the field. Specially Anwar, Malik, Ijaz. What were these guys thinking.
Also, Malik`s dismissal was the sour most point.
If India makes it to 400 around the middle of the third day, consider this test completely out of reach.
Also, Malik`s dismissal was the sour most point.
If India makes it to 400 around the middle of the third day, consider this test completely out of reach.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- masadi: hamid writes "tahmed mian, ....... The Correct Turn
- masadi: Kulharee sahib, your writing... Hop Aboard the Interfaith
- treetop: wonder the nun survived... The Correct Turn
- KaalChakra: hamidm, don't knock Pakistanis... The Correct Turn
- MantoLives: PS you might want... Politics of PPP and
- MantoLives: PS you might want... Politics of PPP and
- hamidm2: Re: # 143 tahmed mian, ....... The Correct Turn
- KaalChakra: NB, at the end... The Correct Turn








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content