unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Twosome Troubles of Troublesome Two

Udayakumar January 8, 2000

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

#1 Posted by SameerJB on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
A very timely and sensible article by S. P. Udeyakumar. He has beautifully laid out his case for a peaceful coexistense in the best interest of the people of India and Pakistan.

(In the case of India and Pakistan, the bilateral relations have been rooted in negative feelings and emotions: desertion, partitioning, betrayal, domination, subjugation, non-acceptance and so forth.)

The bilateral relations have been rooted in the experiences of past generation(s). Most of the new generation have not experienced many of these negative feelings. There should have been more goodwill among the younger generation based on common heritage and in the best interest of the people instead of following in the footsteps of the previous generation(s) and their experiences. Should the current generation of Germany, France and Britain should base their interactions solely on the feelings of previous generation during the second world war? We should have tried to learn from these negative feeling as an aberration in the long history of coexistence instead of being bogged down with them.

(The overall emphasis on the bilateral relations is on intractable conflicts and differences rather than on socioeconomic development and avenues of cooperation.)

It is standard motif for any government to have at least one nemesis in order to focus their energies on the larger and more important issues of improving the living standards and poverty. Unfortunately our governments are stuck with the nemesis part of the equation. All they think and act about are the differences and hardly any efforts or energies are dispensed towards pointing out the similarities among both people. For a peaceful coexistense and the socioeconomic development, it is necessary to acknowledge the problems yet agreeing to non-interference in the affairs of each other and a no-war pact is a necessary first step.

I hope this thread will be used preferentially to discuss concerns common to the people of India and Pakistan instead of differences, with each respondent generally toeing the line of the governments of their motherlands and soon back to TNT, Kashmir and religious differences to score points against each other.





reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by tahmed321 on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
I agree with the spirit of the article. The idea of something like a South Asia Poor People`s Party is a good one but needs to be developed further. Let us start with the question: What will be the goals of such a movement? Possible answers would be (a) to make elimination of poverty the overriding priority of governments in both countries; (b) let the governments have fun shadow boxing one another, and work independently to eliminating poverty (using imaginative solutions like the micro-credit movement); (c) something else. We would then need to have a realistic action plan: e.g. set goal = (a) and set action plan = place open letters in 3 prominent newspapers in each country to BOTH GOVERNMENTS to end their war of words and do something for their poor.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by macgupta on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am


Very nice and idealistic, but how will it work in practice -- people leading and governments following ?

One way people can interact is via trade. But how will trade work if when a fight breaks out between India and Pakistan (e.g., Kargil) , the people who were trading are branded traitors ?

The next thing is that e.g., Indians may not believe the Indian government in all that it says about Pakistan, but they are going to believe the Pakistani government even less. So, while Indians may not believe all that Minister Advani says about the recent hijacking, they are nevertheless not going to believe Pakistani officials claims of non-involvement. The mirror-image situation will exist in Pakistan. Even not following the governments` lead will not lessen mistrust between people.

-arun gupta



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by wiseguy on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
Your quaint ideas touch my soul. However let me tell you about what my father used to mention. That when he was a school stdent in U,P. he had to leave the class room when water was brought for his hindu teacher. Please tell me my father was lying. Nasir



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by sadna on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
wiseguy #5

Capital punishment for those who say the unauthorized greeting `Salaam ...` may be the real problem, actually.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by ai on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
As long as the likes of Atal and Nawaz get elected and the military and civil bureaucracies remain leached the chances of a breakthrough are dim indeed.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by gymnosophist on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
Ref wiseguy #: 5

You ask {Your quaint ideas touch my soul. However let me tell you about what my father used to mention. That when he was a school stdent in U,P. he had to leave the class room when water was brought for his hindu teacher. Please tell me my father was lying. Nasir}

You mean to tell us your father actually went to school with idolaters? Isn`t that haram? In fact, isn`t going to anything other than a madrassah haram? So, what kinds of punishments did your father get from the Muslim community for his transgressions? Were they milder than being asked to leave the classroom for fear of polluting the drinking water of the high-caste teacher when your father had already polluted the entire classroom by his mere presence (according to the beliefs of those days)? Did the Hindu teacher refuse to teach your father?

Oh, yeah? Your father was psychologically scarred by being singled out as a polluting agent? How about the fact that the Hindu teacher`s forebears were forced to live under the thumbs of the local Muslim thugs (jagirdars, subedars, nansubdars, etc.) of the sultans for six centuries, that their lives and religion were not safe, that they had to pay the jizya? I suppose these are all prescribed in the Quran and therefore halal?

Does your father have 4 wives? Does he beat them? Does he keep them in tent-like burquas? Does he sequentially divorce his wives so he can marry fresh women and ``pop the cherry``?

Your image of India (as told to you by your father, about whose veracity I have no doubts) is frozen in time, just like the image of India in the minds of early Indian immigrants to the Caribbean, Sri Lanka, Malaysia or Fiji. You can throw that in our face and you get in return my taunt back to you about the behavior of Muslims. Just like my classmate from France had nothing but contempt for the backward-looking French-Canadians, most of us would treat this piece of historic information with contempt and amusement.

You did choose your handle, wiseguy, correctly: you make wisecracks. Except that some of us will pay you back in kind, with interest!

PS. I have a suggestion for all of you who shed crocodile tears for the plight of low-caste Hindus in India: marry a nice Dalit girl. You will gain merit in the eyes of Allah by getting a convert to Islam. The girl would (according to y`all) get immediate equality with the sayyeds and other Arab descendants living in the Land of the Pure.

Do I see any takers?



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by ali1 on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
Re: temporal # 9

Dear Temporal,

Drink all the vodka you can and date as many dalit/brahmin/banya/thakur/rajput girls as you wish, you`ll always be a `musla` and a `malich` in the eyes of Brahmin bigots. Nothing (least of all your Banglore yatra) will change that.

Have a safe flight to Banglore.

Ali

Re: Ras Siddiqui # 3

``Where there are Indians and Pakistanis, there is hope...``

baqool shair...unki khush gumani per qurban jai-yay. Siddiqui sahib, with the current level of mass hysteria and hatred in India, where exactly do you see hope?

Ali



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by concerned on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
Umairr #192 in the `hegemony...`thread

your thinking...

[`The big problem is with missiles. Countries seem to go berserk when the name missile. Pakistan seems to be countering India, in the name game. Pakistan has an advantage here because historically Muslim rulers/invaders/kings (pre-British days) generally were able to beat up on the local Indian generals, etc. in the Sub-Continent. So everytime India names a missile after one of the historic Hindu generals, Pakistan names its new product after the Muslim general who defeated the corresponding Hindu general. I think India has realized this, and has now changed its naming scheme to names like, `Nag` etc]

what else could one expect from the one-track, confrontational , reactive and unimaginative pakistani establishment.

agni, prithvi, akash, trishul, nag, sagarika and surya.

you (and the pakistani establishment) perhaps do not know the meaning of these words.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by gymnosophist on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
Ref ali1 #: 10

You say {Drink all the vodka you can and date as many dalit/brahmin/banya/thakur/rajput girls as you wish, you`ll always be a `musla` and a `malich` in the eyes of Brahmin bigots. Nothing (least of all your Banglore yatra) will change that.}

Must have touched a raw nerve, eh? You mean to tell us that your family ISN`T claiming to be descendants of Babar or perhaps some of the early Arab invaders of Sindh? Wow! What honesty!

Tell you what. Why don`t you change your last name to Butt? At least, you can make the claim that you were once Kashmiri Pandits!



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by ali1 on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
RE gymnosophist # 15

Your replies # 15 and # 5 show that the only way you can interact is by attacking other people personally, getting to the level of families/fathers etc.

I will post later explaining *your * family background and the sexual habits/preferences of *your * father, mother and other family members. However my friends at chowk might edit it.....although they tend to more tolerant of Hindus/Indians posting trash on tis website.

Ali



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by sadna on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
#11

The `Muslim generals and Hindu generals they vanquished` have been puzzling me exceedingly, too. Given such a simple interpretation of history, what reasons do the self-proclaimed victors have, for carrying around such a sense of injury against those whom they claim to have vanquished so comprehensively?

Sadhana

The pure genealogy question puzzles me, too. How can a whole nation answer for the good conduct of 10-25 generations-worth of each citizen`s ancestors?



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by rajanjua on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
Re: #8 gymnosophist

Dawn 09 January 2000

Cyber-love lands Pakistani in Indian jail!

NEW DELHI, Jan 8: A Pakistani stockbroker who landed in India to marry a woman he has been dating on the internet was arrested in the western city of Bombay for violating visa rules, reports said on Saturday.

Abab Ahmedi, 25, a Lahore stockbroker, has been in police custody since Dec 18 for among other reasons providing a wrong address of stay, the Indian Express reported.

Police said Ahmedi, a Muslim, met his Hindu management student wife in a chat room on the internet and they communicated regularly through e-mail in the last one year. Ahmedi flew down to Bombay on Dec 2, 1999 and the two lovers went to New Delhi to escape the wrath of the girl`s family and got married there. They returned to Bombay on Dec 17.

The next day someone tipped off the police that Ahmedi was not staying in a hotel as mentioned in his visa form but with a family in the city. The police arrested the cyberlover.

He has been remanded to judicial custody for violating India`s Foreigners Act until Jan 11. Police confirmed Ahmedi had no criminal links. Meanwhile his wife, whom the authorities refused to name, said in her plea for his release that they would go to Pakistan once he was let off.-dpa



The lengths we Pakistani go for some sort of normailsation between the two countries and to save you pagans from injustices of caste system and fires of hell. :-)



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by rajanjua on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
Re: #8 gymnosophist

Dawn 09 January 2000

Cyber-love lands Pakistani in Indian jail!

NEW DELHI, Jan 8: A Pakistani stockbroker who landed in India to marry a woman he has been dating on the internet was arrested in the western city of Bombay for violating visa rules, reports said on Saturday.

Abab Ahmedi, 25, a Lahore stockbroker, has been in police custody since Dec 18 for among other reasons providing a wrong address of stay, the Indian Express reported.

Police said Ahmedi, a Muslim, met his Hindu management student wife in a chat room on the internet and they communicated regularly through e-mail in the last one year. Ahmedi flew down to Bombay on Dec 2, 1999 and the two lovers went to New Delhi to escape the wrath of the girl`s family and got married there. They returned to Bombay on Dec 17.

The next day someone tipped off the police that Ahmedi was not staying in a hotel as mentioned in his visa form but with a family in the city. The police arrested the cyberlover.

He has been remanded to judicial custody for violating India`s Foreigners Act until Jan 11. Police confirmed Ahmedi had no criminal links. Meanwhile his wife, whom the authorities refused to name, said in her plea for his release that they would go to Pakistan once he was let off.-dpa



The lengths we Pakistani go for some sort of normalisation between the two countries and to save you pagans from injustices of caste system and fires of hell. :-)



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by tahmed321 on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
gymnosophist

Your reply to wiseguy was so full of anti-Muslim stereotyping, that you unintentionally re-inforced the point wiseguy was trying to make. Congratulations. And while you were at it, you also unintentionally revealed your level of respect for Dalits by assuming their girls were there for the taking. Not a bad days work.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by Layman on November 30, 1999 12:00:00 am
Re Concerned #11

I think you are mistaken when you say that India named the `Prithivi` missile after Prithiviraj Chauhan. As you might be aware, Prithvi means Earth and is among the five `basic elements`. The naming convention only follows the pattern: Agni (Fire) is another `basic element`.

Indian missiles have not been based on historical figures but things like air, water, sky etc.



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Interact Index

    #122 Sheesh Naag
    #121 S.P. Wakil
    #120 temporal
    #119 temporal
    #118 temporal
    #117 Ras Siddiqui
    #116 amit
    #115 tahmed321
    #114 amit
    #113 tahmed321
    #112 tahmed321
    #111 amit
    #110 tahmed321
    #109 tahmed321
    #108 amit
    #107 amit
    #106 tahmed321
    #105 alireza
    #104 alireza
    #103 alireza
    #102 alireza
    #101 syjam
    #100 syjam
    #99 sadna
    #98 syjam
    #97 sadna
    #96 alireza
    #95 alireza
    #94 sadna
    #93 Pardesi
    #92 syjam
    #91 jay
    #90 jay
    #89 rajanjua
    #88 IAS
    #87 rajanjua
    #86 concerned
    #85 SameerJB
    #84 rajanjua
    #83 tvarad
    #82 alireza
    #81 concerned
    #80 rajanjua
    #79 syjam
    #78 jay
    #77 macgupta
    #76 tahmed321
    #75 sadna
    #74 SameerJB
    #73 satyavadi
    #72 satyavadi
    #71 sadna
    #70 ali1
    #69 jay
    #68 SameerJB
    #67 ali1
    #66 SameerJB
    #65 Pardesi
    #64 rajanjua
    #63 satyavadi
    #62 rajanjua
    #61 gymnosophist
    #60 ali1
    #59 ali1
    #58 Pardesi
    #57 Pardesi
    #56 gymnosophist
    #55 SameerJB
    #54 tahmed321
    #53 ali1
    #52 anarayan
    #51 rajanjua
    #50 gymnosophist
    #49 gymnosophist
    #48 gymnosophist
    #47 concerned
    #46 friend
    #45 ali1
    #44 rajanjua
    #43 rajanjua
    #42 gymnosophist
    #41 anarayan
    #40 friend
    #39 rajanjua
    #38 friend
    #37 sadna
    #36 friend
    #35 jay
    #34 ali1
    #33 ali1
    #32 concerned
    #31 rajanjua
    #30 gymnosophist
    #29 friend
    #28 narain
    #27 sadna
    #26 rajanjua
    #25 rajanjua
    #24 gymnosophist
    #23 gymnosophist
    #22 gymnosophist
    #21 gymnosophist
    #20 gymnosophist
    #19 ali1
    #18 concerned
    #17 rajanjua
    #16 Layman
    #15 tahmed321
    #14 rajanjua
    #13 rajanjua
    #12 sadna
    #11 ali1
    #10 gymnosophist
    #9 concerned
    #8 ali1
    #7 gymnosophist
    #6 ai
    #5 sadna
    #4 wiseguy
    #3 macgupta
    #2 tahmed321
    #1 SameerJB

Latest Interacts

  • masadi: HP writes "were large... There is no ‘honour’
  • tahmed32: #72 hamidm: i grew... Why Zardari Should Be
  • hamidm2: Re: # 70 tahmed, .... so... Why Zardari Should Be
  • tahmed32: hamidm: actually, i think... Why Zardari Should Be
  • tahmed32: hamidm: as for "falling... Why Zardari Should Be
  • tahmed32: hamidm: i am neither... Why Zardari Should Be
  • hamidm2: Re: # 80 bubba, .... this... US Commando Strike in
  • anil: #67: Hamidm sahib: "...would put bill... Why Zardari Should Be

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Save Me From Charismatic Leaders!
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • US Commando Strike in Waziristan
  • Free to Breed
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Tania
  • Aitchison: Scenes From Within
  • It’s Time to Bomb New York
  • Khodoki
  • Disowning Altruism

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited