Feroz R Khan March 6, 2001
#117 Posted by hxn on March 9, 2001 12:57:32 am
sigalph235 #119
tahmed321 #110
Ferozk #94
I think the “bush is an idiot” stereotype is one that is too simplistic. Moreover, it definitely seems that bush and his administration not only ignore addressing the stereotype but also seem to try and perpetuate it in order for his opponents to underestimate him. Judging by bush’s performance in the presidential debates last year and his address to congress last week, the strategy is working.
I think bush is a true conservative, and if there is one thing clinton proved in his 8 years, its that conservative rule is superior. If you look at the relatively few good things that happened during clinton’s administration (although one of those few, the good economy, was a very big good thing), they were all fueled by conservative, traditionally republican, ideas.
You had 6 years of vibrant economic growth, which came (coincidentally?), after the republicans swept the congress in ’94, balanced the budget, and reined in spending. You had the republican welfare reform bill that clinton signed before the ’96 election after vetoing twice. You had the republican capital gains tax reduction that clinton signed. The one successful thing that clinton did support without being forced by republicans was NAFTA, for which he deserves credit. Overall, if you look at clinton’s record, the only things that were successful were the conservative/republican ideas. Traditional democratic initiatives like clinton’s socialized (“universal”) healthcare initiative of 92-93 or the CTBT or his middle east “peace” (at any cost to establish a legacy) initiatives all failed miserably. And even though the ’96 republican welfare reform was a tremendous success, no traditional left-wing democrat could support it, which is why you had ultra-left wingers like Ralph Nader coming out against clinton-gore last year.
Furthermore, in addition to the republicans taking over congress for the first time in what seems like a millennia, a majority of the nation’s governors went republican on clinton’s watch and these governors have fueled much of the innovative ideas in government coming from the states in the 90’s, including welfare and education reform. Not only was clinton extremely damaging to the democratic party, but despite his own liberal instincts, bill clinton’s record proves that conservatism (free market, small government, individual liberty) is truly the superior political philosophy. The only ideas that worked during the clinton years were the traditionally conservative ideas.
tahmed321 #110
Ferozk #94
I think the “bush is an idiot” stereotype is one that is too simplistic. Moreover, it definitely seems that bush and his administration not only ignore addressing the stereotype but also seem to try and perpetuate it in order for his opponents to underestimate him. Judging by bush’s performance in the presidential debates last year and his address to congress last week, the strategy is working.
I think bush is a true conservative, and if there is one thing clinton proved in his 8 years, its that conservative rule is superior. If you look at the relatively few good things that happened during clinton’s administration (although one of those few, the good economy, was a very big good thing), they were all fueled by conservative, traditionally republican, ideas.
You had 6 years of vibrant economic growth, which came (coincidentally?), after the republicans swept the congress in ’94, balanced the budget, and reined in spending. You had the republican welfare reform bill that clinton signed before the ’96 election after vetoing twice. You had the republican capital gains tax reduction that clinton signed. The one successful thing that clinton did support without being forced by republicans was NAFTA, for which he deserves credit. Overall, if you look at clinton’s record, the only things that were successful were the conservative/republican ideas. Traditional democratic initiatives like clinton’s socialized (“universal”) healthcare initiative of 92-93 or the CTBT or his middle east “peace” (at any cost to establish a legacy) initiatives all failed miserably. And even though the ’96 republican welfare reform was a tremendous success, no traditional left-wing democrat could support it, which is why you had ultra-left wingers like Ralph Nader coming out against clinton-gore last year.
Furthermore, in addition to the republicans taking over congress for the first time in what seems like a millennia, a majority of the nation’s governors went republican on clinton’s watch and these governors have fueled much of the innovative ideas in government coming from the states in the 90’s, including welfare and education reform. Not only was clinton extremely damaging to the democratic party, but despite his own liberal instincts, bill clinton’s record proves that conservatism (free market, small government, individual liberty) is truly the superior political philosophy. The only ideas that worked during the clinton years were the traditionally conservative ideas.
#116 Posted by hxn on March 9, 2001 12:57:32 am
Ferozk #94
You wrote, “Lets admit the truth...big business paid for Bush`s election and corporate America is making huge returns...after all their errand boy is the president of the United States.”
You call yourself a republican? I think you’re in the wrong party, yaar. You see, it is the democrats (not the republicans) who subscribe to the “all the world is ruled by a super elite class of gora old racist capitalist pigs, so we must therefore surrender all our rights as citizens to an even more oppressive and tyrannical government in order to protect us from aforementioned pigs” theory.
Let me guess, you traditionally vote democratic, but, as a true hypocritical israeli-hating pakistani (you know, b/c israel did the same thing in ’48 that pakistan did the year before in forming a religious state – how dare those israelis!) you couldn’t bring yourself to vote for gore since he put a jew (lieberman) on the ticket. Whatever it takes to bring in the pakistani vote I guess…
You wrote, “Lets admit the truth...big business paid for Bush`s election and corporate America is making huge returns...after all their errand boy is the president of the United States.”
You call yourself a republican? I think you’re in the wrong party, yaar. You see, it is the democrats (not the republicans) who subscribe to the “all the world is ruled by a super elite class of gora old racist capitalist pigs, so we must therefore surrender all our rights as citizens to an even more oppressive and tyrannical government in order to protect us from aforementioned pigs” theory.
Let me guess, you traditionally vote democratic, but, as a true hypocritical israeli-hating pakistani (you know, b/c israel did the same thing in ’48 that pakistan did the year before in forming a religious state – how dare those israelis!) you couldn’t bring yourself to vote for gore since he put a jew (lieberman) on the ticket. Whatever it takes to bring in the pakistani vote I guess…
#114 Posted by AMITG on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
ahmadb #105:
I do not wish to needlessly further the argument about what is/is not condemnable/worth raising a voice. To each his own. Suffice it to say that no human life was at stake in the case of the statues and hence no trade-offs were made.
This issue deserves more than a general experession of sadness/helplessness considering the potential ramifications.
I do not wish to needlessly further the argument about what is/is not condemnable/worth raising a voice. To each his own. Suffice it to say that no human life was at stake in the case of the statues and hence no trade-offs were made.
This issue deserves more than a general experession of sadness/helplessness considering the potential ramifications.
#113 Posted by latif chappu on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
Re: Temporal
Ah... I see.
Well, in that case the Hail Mary`s quite appropriate. He should throw while he can cuz he`s gonna have to completely abandon the passing game from here on out!
In marriage it`s all about eking out couple-three yards each down.
If I was Feroze I`d get ready for some down & dirty smash mouth trench fights.
Ah... I see.
Well, in that case the Hail Mary`s quite appropriate. He should throw while he can cuz he`s gonna have to completely abandon the passing game from here on out!
In marriage it`s all about eking out couple-three yards each down.
If I was Feroze I`d get ready for some down & dirty smash mouth trench fights.
#112 Posted by tahmed321 on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
Ferozk #94 ``Yaar, as a fellow GOPer, I have to disagree with you!...I think that George W. Bush is a certified idiot! ...He has given us Bush, but seriously, yaar, America does not deserve this idiot and I feel for America having to suffer this moron for the next four years!``
Must warm your tummy, yaar, calling the President of the US an idiot and a moron, yaar. After all, isnt that what all the Anglos (and you are one them now, yaar, and a proud member of the GOP no less) are saying as well, so it must be true, right yaar. This means you, yaar, must be really smart. Too bad your article indicates the opposite.
Must warm your tummy, yaar, calling the President of the US an idiot and a moron, yaar. After all, isnt that what all the Anglos (and you are one them now, yaar, and a proud member of the GOP no less) are saying as well, so it must be true, right yaar. This means you, yaar, must be really smart. Too bad your article indicates the opposite.
#111 Posted by sigalph235 on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
re ferozk and rsaxena
Obviously I never supported Bill Clinton and found his personal character and political agenda at a 180 degree variance with my views. Nonetheless, he was my president and I never ever called him `sleazebag`, `idiot` and other assorted names. Such name calling is one of the symptoms of our political culture in South Asia where politics is considered a zero sum game. So when you gentlemen use the innuendos that you do to describe a man who was elected (I guess Ferozk you didn`t get the latest from the Florida review) my president, it is only fair for me to take exception with the words used. It is the old liberal game of attacking a person when they cannot attack policies. It backfired with Reagan and it will backfire again. Reagan went on to become the (and this is from last month`s Gallup) ``most popular president`` (surpassing Lincoln) while nobody remembers or cares for the conductors of the symphony orchestra of liberalism like Tip O`Neill and Dukakis and John ANderson(nominal republican).
As for Bush`s foreign policy team, at least he has a team. Clinton had a revolving door of whoever walked in with the biggest contributions. Yes, I have confidence in the Powell-Cheney-Rice-Rumsfeld team because they are proven experts. Find another Republican team that comes close. And by the way Ferozek, Teddy Roosevelt`s big stick policy worked in keeping the peace. You may not recall but he is one of the few Americans who got the Nobel Peace Prize-a prize that ususally goes to assorted left wing activists otherwise.
Obviously I never supported Bill Clinton and found his personal character and political agenda at a 180 degree variance with my views. Nonetheless, he was my president and I never ever called him `sleazebag`, `idiot` and other assorted names. Such name calling is one of the symptoms of our political culture in South Asia where politics is considered a zero sum game. So when you gentlemen use the innuendos that you do to describe a man who was elected (I guess Ferozk you didn`t get the latest from the Florida review) my president, it is only fair for me to take exception with the words used. It is the old liberal game of attacking a person when they cannot attack policies. It backfired with Reagan and it will backfire again. Reagan went on to become the (and this is from last month`s Gallup) ``most popular president`` (surpassing Lincoln) while nobody remembers or cares for the conductors of the symphony orchestra of liberalism like Tip O`Neill and Dukakis and John ANderson(nominal republican).
As for Bush`s foreign policy team, at least he has a team. Clinton had a revolving door of whoever walked in with the biggest contributions. Yes, I have confidence in the Powell-Cheney-Rice-Rumsfeld team because they are proven experts. Find another Republican team that comes close. And by the way Ferozek, Teddy Roosevelt`s big stick policy worked in keeping the peace. You may not recall but he is one of the few Americans who got the Nobel Peace Prize-a prize that ususally goes to assorted left wing activists otherwise.
#110 Posted by rsridhar on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
Re:hinduism
Here are my two pennies about hinduism. Hinduism should actually be called ``Sanatana Dharma`` (or the everprevailing religion).There was no name to it initially(``What would you name something that was the first to arrive on the scene`` was Shankaracharya of Kanchi`s refrain when asked about the real name of this religion). It can also be called ``Vedic Dharma`` (code of conduct as per the Vedas-the sacred book of Hindus). The Greeks and later the Arabs gave it the present name. Hinduism is really a way of living. There is no single book or a single God. Do we consider Shaivites (followers of God Shiva,the more popular God in the South)as seperate from Vaishnavites (the followers of God Vishnu,more popular in the North). In the old days,the 2 often fought for supremacy. There is now an understanding among all hindus that all these Gods are same and represent different aspects of one single God (or Brahman). So you will never find hindus ever fighting over their gods despite having a zillion ones to choose from. Since there is nothing as a last prophet, prophets have been born upto the present age,interpreting and reinterpreting the sacred texts,putting them in the right perspective,in consonence with the modern times. Nobody ever fights over the message of Geetha or the Vedas.
Of course, all this has nothing to do with the culture. Culture of north is vastly different from the South. A South Indian muslim resembles his hindu counterpart more than he resembles a north indian muslim. He dresses the same way and speaks the same language. Culture is determined by the sum total of your experiences in one geographical area.
On the other hand, there is a common thread flowing through this ancient religion that binds the hindus from all over the country: this is in the form of common legends,mythologies,common deities etc. All this go to make the religion complex for an outsider but really very simple to follow for a hindu (here i am not talking about the customs and taboos).
sridhar
Here are my two pennies about hinduism. Hinduism should actually be called ``Sanatana Dharma`` (or the everprevailing religion).There was no name to it initially(``What would you name something that was the first to arrive on the scene`` was Shankaracharya of Kanchi`s refrain when asked about the real name of this religion). It can also be called ``Vedic Dharma`` (code of conduct as per the Vedas-the sacred book of Hindus). The Greeks and later the Arabs gave it the present name. Hinduism is really a way of living. There is no single book or a single God. Do we consider Shaivites (followers of God Shiva,the more popular God in the South)as seperate from Vaishnavites (the followers of God Vishnu,more popular in the North). In the old days,the 2 often fought for supremacy. There is now an understanding among all hindus that all these Gods are same and represent different aspects of one single God (or Brahman). So you will never find hindus ever fighting over their gods despite having a zillion ones to choose from. Since there is nothing as a last prophet, prophets have been born upto the present age,interpreting and reinterpreting the sacred texts,putting them in the right perspective,in consonence with the modern times. Nobody ever fights over the message of Geetha or the Vedas.
Of course, all this has nothing to do with the culture. Culture of north is vastly different from the South. A South Indian muslim resembles his hindu counterpart more than he resembles a north indian muslim. He dresses the same way and speaks the same language. Culture is determined by the sum total of your experiences in one geographical area.
On the other hand, there is a common thread flowing through this ancient religion that binds the hindus from all over the country: this is in the form of common legends,mythologies,common deities etc. All this go to make the religion complex for an outsider but really very simple to follow for a hindu (here i am not talking about the customs and taboos).
sridhar
#109 Posted by rajanjua on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
Re: Truth
You are more than justified in raising your voice in anger against this senseless act. Would like to see this blind idiot lynched.
You are more than justified in raising your voice in anger against this senseless act. Would like to see this blind idiot lynched.
#108 Posted by asfand on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
Reply to tahmad321 #84
``The Taliban forced their way to power, and have shown no indication that they need to be elected.``
I guess tou will say the same things to Chinese revolution. They forced their way in. No election. Since when election (Democracy) became the de-facto mode of government. Kingdoms and communism still exist today. So if Talibans formed a revolutionary government what is wrong with it. O yes, I see it is wrong in your frame of reference. So as democracy which is wrong in Talibans frame of reference
``4 million Afghans have voted with their feet and left the country - there are 50,000 in Hamburg alone, I was told today by a man who used to live in that city. Hundreds of children died of cold and starvation. ``
This is how revolutions happen. French, Chinese, and Establishment of an Islamic State in the life of Prophet Muhammed PBUH are good examples. Systems are changed only by paying the price in blood. In China and in France a lot of people who do not conform to the change left the country at that time. Think about American revolution where American Minute-men fought with British Army and forced them to leave the American Continent. Lot of men, women and children lost their lives or shall we say ``voted by their lives.``
``Even as the Taliban are making waves destroying statues, thousands of Afghans are dying of starvation and cold in the North. The Taliban may seem crazy, but they are crazy like a fox: easy to divert everyone`s attention from the mess the have made by showing off their ``Islamic fervor`` (actually it is satanic, nothing to do with Islam, what they are doing). ``
It is a war of the systems. Democracy and Communism on one side and Islamic system on the other side. When Mecca came under Muslim control for the first time, Prophet Muhammed PBUH himself broke all the idols sitting inside Kaaba numbering 360 in total. He did not sell them to Kafirs nor he made any appologetic remarks. He simply broke them all by his own hands. Why?? Because that was the change he was bringing. Idol worsip has no place in Islam and Kaaba was to become center place for Muslims thus all the idols were broken. Similarly, when system got changed in some of the russian republics, Stalin statues were broken because they symbolized a different system.
``The foggy sense of morality of many well-off people in Pakistan (and your post and FR KHans article are good examples) is the reason why countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan (and India too) continue to be insensitive to the worst kind of injustices (helpless and innocent women languishing in jails, the rich fleecing the country, and so on) while remaining to slights to their precious pride due to articles in Western newspapers. The US is not perfect by any means, but imperfections are freely debated and reported and actually fixed here. In Pakistan and other such countries, the tendancy is to hide imperfections and to ridicule anyone who brings them out or to question their motives.``
My friend, again the foggy sense you are talking about people like me is in your frame of reference. In my frame of reference it is crystal clear. Talibans are still in the preliminary revolution phase. Once they are given a period of complete peace of lets say 50 years and even if they fails and do not establish a perfect Islamic government then you can blame them. USA has almost 200 years of peace and they are improving their system ever since. Will you not give talibans even 50!
Asfand Siddiqui
Sacramento CA
``The Taliban forced their way to power, and have shown no indication that they need to be elected.``
I guess tou will say the same things to Chinese revolution. They forced their way in. No election. Since when election (Democracy) became the de-facto mode of government. Kingdoms and communism still exist today. So if Talibans formed a revolutionary government what is wrong with it. O yes, I see it is wrong in your frame of reference. So as democracy which is wrong in Talibans frame of reference
``4 million Afghans have voted with their feet and left the country - there are 50,000 in Hamburg alone, I was told today by a man who used to live in that city. Hundreds of children died of cold and starvation. ``
This is how revolutions happen. French, Chinese, and Establishment of an Islamic State in the life of Prophet Muhammed PBUH are good examples. Systems are changed only by paying the price in blood. In China and in France a lot of people who do not conform to the change left the country at that time. Think about American revolution where American Minute-men fought with British Army and forced them to leave the American Continent. Lot of men, women and children lost their lives or shall we say ``voted by their lives.``
``Even as the Taliban are making waves destroying statues, thousands of Afghans are dying of starvation and cold in the North. The Taliban may seem crazy, but they are crazy like a fox: easy to divert everyone`s attention from the mess the have made by showing off their ``Islamic fervor`` (actually it is satanic, nothing to do with Islam, what they are doing). ``
It is a war of the systems. Democracy and Communism on one side and Islamic system on the other side. When Mecca came under Muslim control for the first time, Prophet Muhammed PBUH himself broke all the idols sitting inside Kaaba numbering 360 in total. He did not sell them to Kafirs nor he made any appologetic remarks. He simply broke them all by his own hands. Why?? Because that was the change he was bringing. Idol worsip has no place in Islam and Kaaba was to become center place for Muslims thus all the idols were broken. Similarly, when system got changed in some of the russian republics, Stalin statues were broken because they symbolized a different system.
``The foggy sense of morality of many well-off people in Pakistan (and your post and FR KHans article are good examples) is the reason why countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan (and India too) continue to be insensitive to the worst kind of injustices (helpless and innocent women languishing in jails, the rich fleecing the country, and so on) while remaining to slights to their precious pride due to articles in Western newspapers. The US is not perfect by any means, but imperfections are freely debated and reported and actually fixed here. In Pakistan and other such countries, the tendancy is to hide imperfections and to ridicule anyone who brings them out or to question their motives.``
My friend, again the foggy sense you are talking about people like me is in your frame of reference. In my frame of reference it is crystal clear. Talibans are still in the preliminary revolution phase. Once they are given a period of complete peace of lets say 50 years and even if they fails and do not establish a perfect Islamic government then you can blame them. USA has almost 200 years of peace and they are improving their system ever since. Will you not give talibans even 50!
Asfand Siddiqui
Sacramento CA
#107 Posted by shammi on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
Dear Bilal Ahmed:
We have all a lot to learn from you
Sincerely, Shammi
We have all a lot to learn from you
Sincerely, Shammi
#106 Posted by firstslip on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
Response to # 101
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dear tahmed321,
No thats not what I think when I am guarding first slip position at that time I prefer thinking about Cricket. You love my ``spellings``
thanx ... Wish I could have said same about your ``ENGLISH !``
A view from fist Slip,
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dear tahmed321,
No thats not what I think when I am guarding first slip position at that time I prefer thinking about Cricket. You love my ``spellings``
thanx ... Wish I could have said same about your ``ENGLISH !``
A view from fist Slip,
#105 Posted by firstslip on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
In response to # 89
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dear Eklavya,
No I aint a Hindu (if you mean to say
the Hindu in regular sense) I am Pakistani No doubt and was born to a Muslim family.
I strongly beleive that one of the only
way to co-exist in this world and in sub-contenent is to respect the people with different ideas. Try to acheive peace and calmness in the soicety.
A view from,
FirstSlip
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dear Eklavya,
No I aint a Hindu (if you mean to say
the Hindu in regular sense) I am Pakistani No doubt and was born to a Muslim family.
I strongly beleive that one of the only
way to co-exist in this world and in sub-contenent is to respect the people with different ideas. Try to acheive peace and calmness in the soicety.
A view from,
FirstSlip
#104 Posted by anamika on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
#79 macgupta
I listened to the interview with Junger. He made some astonishing points: (1) Pak army regulars are fighting alongside the Taliban & (2) By this summer, Pak support will diminish and Massoud will be on his way to victory. If (2) comes to pass, it seems to me that Pak is riding a tiger it cannot dismount. If the Taliban is defeated, Pak will have another (very) hostile neighbor, severe unrest in Baluchistan and Taliban refugees in Pak pushing the polity there even more to the extreme. India, I am afraid, will suffer as well, since a defeated Taliban can focus more on Kashmir.
I`d like to hear the opinion of the army types out there.
I listened to the interview with Junger. He made some astonishing points: (1) Pak army regulars are fighting alongside the Taliban & (2) By this summer, Pak support will diminish and Massoud will be on his way to victory. If (2) comes to pass, it seems to me that Pak is riding a tiger it cannot dismount. If the Taliban is defeated, Pak will have another (very) hostile neighbor, severe unrest in Baluchistan and Taliban refugees in Pak pushing the polity there even more to the extreme. India, I am afraid, will suffer as well, since a defeated Taliban can focus more on Kashmir.
I`d like to hear the opinion of the army types out there.
#103 Posted by Tibor on March 8, 2001 8:12:37 pm
sb,
You question was why should Taliban listen to the workd opnion.
Well...because the world feeds those black soul dogs. If it weren`t to western (the great satan) food aid, 90% of those animals would have been dead by now.
You question was why should Taliban listen to the workd opnion.
Well...because the world feeds those black soul dogs. If it weren`t to western (the great satan) food aid, 90% of those animals would have been dead by now.
#102 Posted by temporal on March 8, 2001 2:43:08 pm
Latif Chappu #73:
Nice explanation: preaching to the converted, though:)
Feroz badmash is counting the last days/hours of his freedom. Entering the matrimonial penitentiary for life or death (!) March 10. (Good luck and best wishes S. Keep him coming here. We will keep him honest!)
To refill a drink, where just catching the bar tender’s eyes would do, Feroz habitually yells out the whole order --- where one sentence suffices he would use no less than five.
My comment covered this and more.
Excessive, verbose, long, hazy on logic or brilliant (in the sense he had sweeping bits offending everyone) and hoping one of the wide receivers jumping up there would grab the ball in the mele. And indifferent; hence the grin.
One last one before time runs out.
regards,
t
Nice explanation: preaching to the converted, though:)
Feroz badmash is counting the last days/hours of his freedom. Entering the matrimonial penitentiary for life or death (!) March 10. (Good luck and best wishes S. Keep him coming here. We will keep him honest!)
To refill a drink, where just catching the bar tender’s eyes would do, Feroz habitually yells out the whole order --- where one sentence suffices he would use no less than five.
My comment covered this and more.
Excessive, verbose, long, hazy on logic or brilliant (in the sense he had sweeping bits offending everyone) and hoping one of the wide receivers jumping up there would grab the ball in the mele. And indifferent; hence the grin.
One last one before time runs out.
regards,
t
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- KaalChakra: first, and to what... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- KaalChakra: I think our discussion... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- KaalChakra: rahul, there has never... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- rahul_capri: sadna,I just read it,thanks.I... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- KaalChakra: Sadna, ok, a question. We... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- sadna: Do you remember the... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- hamidm2: Re: # 115 tahmed, ... you... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- sadna: PS: I think the... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content