Mrs. Rashid

basically i am confused..i dont know what to say..the style of the writer is quite good and direct..i personally like itbut isnt the ending quite abrupt..

12-head, soon to be headless imposter....
Hasbe ma`amool, you miss the point and make ridiculous nonsensical statements...every dog has its day, and you seem to have its day every single day. Waise it would be an insult to dogs and all other animals..even a pig...to compare you to them.
Furthermore, the only person filling up unplugged with garbage is you, your multiple nicks, and your buddy hydras.
And no, I don`t need to friggin` explain this to you because you don`t have the capacity to understand...but sameer is our friend, and we don`t need to be fantasizing about him at whatever age we are. You on the other hand, have made a career here on Chowk out of harassing women, insulting them, and now posting what was a private email that you should have never had access to, because you have no respect whatsoever for a listserv, let alone a person`s privacy. Is there any sign of brain functioning that can help you understand this???? You throw garbage at us...don`t expect not to have some thrown right back at you. Now do us ALL the humongous favor of zipping your own lips and getting lost.

P.S. to the person who said it`s oh so fashionable for those `cept for Samina Shah to get on the hydra`s case, you couldn`t even begin to put yourself in our shoes.

Ashok/12 head/whatever

No, Psychohead, its not the ridiculous number of nicks who all write the same stupid garbage, its that you VIOLATED THE CYBER RULES OF AN PRIVATE LISTSERV AND POSTED A PRIVATE CYBER LETTER.

CAN YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, SON OF PORKCHOP?

I liked the very existential nature of the conclusion.
The abrupt death had a minor impact on some people
just to start some tongue wagging, but little else.
Life went on as usual.

Ras

Urstruly,

There should be a secret women`s ku klux klan....

And yes, everyone except you has access...

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

Saminashah

I cannot get into sawnet. What the hell is that and how the hell do I get in there and why the hell it didn`t let me in. I can`t read what suraya posted cuz it is unbearable to read beyond first three lines. And why the hell sawnet information so privilged when every aira ghaira nathu khaira has an access to it except me? Is this another secret woman`s ku klux klan society against us men haiN?

Urstruly,

Psycho head broke one of the Sawnet Listserv rules and violated the privacy of a young woman so that he could he make another one of sick ideas seem legitimate. Surely, even you can understand that....

What is this fuss about someone posting a cut`n`paste job. People do it all the time. Besides it is hard to read more than two lines what suraya has posted. Could someone plz summarize it for me -

Mr. 12 Head: You be nice to your baaji samina. Ok?


===========

I failed to see the point in this article. Is writer trying to say that:

- Fuking your secratery is bad

or

- If you are fuking your secratry then it is also ok for your wife to fukk the guy at 7-11.

or

- Fuking you secratry is bad because you have a wife at home - but it is not clear that if your secratary doesn`t have a husband at home then it is ok to fuk her boss; does same apply for sanjay

or

- Is the writer trying to say that fornication is an amoral act that destroys lives, families, and welfare of children. Two people in this story lost their lives because someone else fornicated. Is that what writer is saying? or s/he is not?

Well its really says so much about the kinds of cowardly excuses that the interactor who calls himself ``Studebaker`` as well as 50 other nicks can come up with so many disgusting excuses for posting a private listserv letter. What is sick about this behavior is that he is 1. violating the privacy of a person who asked for advice in a private forum 2. posted the letter for pathetic reasons-if his past positions are any indication. 3. Uses a pathologically denial laden excuse: ``Oh, it is YOU who are to blame for making such a big deal`` and the complete refusal to take responsibility for his breach of Sawnet policy and the privacy of a woman who is struggling with a very personal issue.

If Chowk readers and editors go to the unplugged threads, they will see that Studebaker under his 50 or so nicks continues to insult women who are Christian, Hindu or progressive. Since he is the only interactor on Chowk who seems to commit these kinds of harassing behaviors for the last two years, it would seem that Chowk readers and management would try to limit the extent of his constant annoyances and transgressions.

I am willing to agree with Noor at this point. Maybe Chowk is not worth it. As she pointed out, this latest incident is even less amusing than his usual badtameezi.

thanks - for the site.

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

#30 by Saminasha:

right on!…as for the inter-actor under question it should not surprise you to find it is none other than the infamous multiple…

lve,

…t

ps: for those interested


Why is Sawnet restricted to women?
http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/users/sawweb/sawnet/woman-only.html

Buds of May,

Google Sawnet.

best.

thank u bismil, a very poignant story... and well written...:)

Hi - SaminaSha - could you tell me about the Sawnet listserv + where i can find it?
Thanks.