Aqdas Afzal November 2, 2002
#84 Posted by Tipu on November 4, 2002 11:18:23 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#83 Posted by Tipu on November 4, 2002 11:18:23 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#82 Posted by Tipu on November 4, 2002 11:18:23 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#81 Posted by satyavadi on November 4, 2002 9:58:31 am
Stuka #70::
[[The term ``wheatish complexion`` actually means dark. Fair means wheatish and very fair means fair. It`s kinda like stock recommendations by Analysts; you have to discount by one. Like Hold = Sell, Buy = Hold, Strong Buy = Buy etc. ]]
And slim means average, average means chubby and slightly on the heavier side means really fat. From the experience of friends on shaadi.com and other such sites.
[[The term ``wheatish complexion`` actually means dark. Fair means wheatish and very fair means fair. It`s kinda like stock recommendations by Analysts; you have to discount by one. Like Hold = Sell, Buy = Hold, Strong Buy = Buy etc. ]]
And slim means average, average means chubby and slightly on the heavier side means really fat. From the experience of friends on shaadi.com and other such sites.
#80 Posted by satyavadi on November 4, 2002 9:36:22 am
Stuka #70::
[[The term ``wheatish complexion`` actually means dark. Fair means wheatish and very fair means fair. It`s kinda like stock recommendations by Analysts; you have to discount by one. Like Hold = Sell, Buy = Hold, Strong Buy = Buy etc. ]]
And slim means average, average means chubby and slightly on the heavier side means really fat. From the experience of friends on shaadi.com and other such sites.
[[The term ``wheatish complexion`` actually means dark. Fair means wheatish and very fair means fair. It`s kinda like stock recommendations by Analysts; you have to discount by one. Like Hold = Sell, Buy = Hold, Strong Buy = Buy etc. ]]
And slim means average, average means chubby and slightly on the heavier side means really fat. From the experience of friends on shaadi.com and other such sites.
#79 Posted by khamkhwa. on November 4, 2002 9:06:01 am
Suck sena:
[...this is absolutely necessary...the dutch have implemented this, and the results make them look like geniuses...even the otherwise rigid singaporeans are toying with the idea...but desis will never grow up enough to think as practically...]
You are hereby awarded the degree of `Master of Arts` for your original research on Prostitution and its planned growth.
Good luck in your future endeavours;)
[...this is absolutely necessary...the dutch have implemented this, and the results make them look like geniuses...even the otherwise rigid singaporeans are toying with the idea...but desis will never grow up enough to think as practically...]
You are hereby awarded the degree of `Master of Arts` for your original research on Prostitution and its planned growth.
Good luck in your future endeavours;)
#78 Posted by ERaman on November 4, 2002 9:06:01 am
Bagha Jatin-
Does that word mean Tiger in Bongla?
Does that word mean Tiger in Bongla?
#77 Posted by rsaxena on November 4, 2002 9:06:01 am
re: semipreciousme
{...true...all the `mixed` race i.e. half-desi and half-white ppl i know are extremely good looking...guess they get the best of both genomes... }
...i am covinced, the more gene pool mixing the better...
{...true...all the `mixed` race i.e. half-desi and half-white ppl i know are extremely good looking...guess they get the best of both genomes... }
...i am covinced, the more gene pool mixing the better...
#76 Posted by SameerJB on November 4, 2002 9:06:01 am
Saminashah #62:
[Hadnt the ``Aryan`` invaders forced the indigenous ``Dravidians`` into Central and Southern India way before the Brits?]
Well, even if we go by the popular history of that era, the color was not one of the most important issues in Aryan-Drividian conflict, it was power and culture. Drividians are considered much earlier ``invaders`` than indigenous. The scheduled castes and some hill tribes are considered more indigenous than Dravidians.
Going by Aryan prejudice against colored people combined with invasion hypothesis should have resulted in majority white/ olive skin than we currently have. The genes responsible for skin color are not as dominating and recurring as black hair and black eye color. The dark color fades with selective breeding with whites over less than 10 generations with very little chance of producing a jet black kid within 200 years.
A very aggressive white selection would have left a sizable population unwanted and unwed. To the best of my knowledge this has never happened in subcontinent. Another very important thing is presence of fair skin people among poor and low caste people. Based on color alone a poor Kashmiri girl must be highly valued for Telegu or Tamil speaking people but that is not the case.
[Also, does the caste system enforce color prejudice and racism?]
The prejudice or selection has been name of the game throughout not just human but also animal history. When two daughter of the same parents have different value for potential males, the caste, tribal affiliation, religion, ethnicity, nationality and everything in between deginitely influence.
Nobody marries a person with serious birth defect or disability no matter how white or wheatish she is. Isn`t that a prejudice? It is difficult to clearly draw a line between prejudice, racism and natural selection and survival of the fittest. No matter how open minded and liberal we become, some close mindedness exists in everybody, some of which is in the control of human genome for the purpose of survival of the fittest. Not even Abraham, Moses or Muhammad married a blind, lame or severely disabled women. Jesus and others would not have either if married.
Many of the things are easy said than done. As I said, I like freedom to choose in finding mate but nobody against arranged marriage is rushing to mental institutions to find mate using freedom of choice and equal opportunity for all. The prejudice, selection and racism is equally present in going for marriage not arranged.
My point is that in in blame game, as I explained to Punjabn, passing on the buck to Aryans and British must be judged rationally in addition to looking at your own choices in the name of survival of the fittest. No wonder, my numero uno Guru said: ``Life is dukha because of interdependent arising.`` Best way to deal with it is to consider nothingness and formlessness of its nature as its essence.
[Hadnt the ``Aryan`` invaders forced the indigenous ``Dravidians`` into Central and Southern India way before the Brits?]
Well, even if we go by the popular history of that era, the color was not one of the most important issues in Aryan-Drividian conflict, it was power and culture. Drividians are considered much earlier ``invaders`` than indigenous. The scheduled castes and some hill tribes are considered more indigenous than Dravidians.
Going by Aryan prejudice against colored people combined with invasion hypothesis should have resulted in majority white/ olive skin than we currently have. The genes responsible for skin color are not as dominating and recurring as black hair and black eye color. The dark color fades with selective breeding with whites over less than 10 generations with very little chance of producing a jet black kid within 200 years.
A very aggressive white selection would have left a sizable population unwanted and unwed. To the best of my knowledge this has never happened in subcontinent. Another very important thing is presence of fair skin people among poor and low caste people. Based on color alone a poor Kashmiri girl must be highly valued for Telegu or Tamil speaking people but that is not the case.
[Also, does the caste system enforce color prejudice and racism?]
The prejudice or selection has been name of the game throughout not just human but also animal history. When two daughter of the same parents have different value for potential males, the caste, tribal affiliation, religion, ethnicity, nationality and everything in between deginitely influence.
Nobody marries a person with serious birth defect or disability no matter how white or wheatish she is. Isn`t that a prejudice? It is difficult to clearly draw a line between prejudice, racism and natural selection and survival of the fittest. No matter how open minded and liberal we become, some close mindedness exists in everybody, some of which is in the control of human genome for the purpose of survival of the fittest. Not even Abraham, Moses or Muhammad married a blind, lame or severely disabled women. Jesus and others would not have either if married.
Many of the things are easy said than done. As I said, I like freedom to choose in finding mate but nobody against arranged marriage is rushing to mental institutions to find mate using freedom of choice and equal opportunity for all. The prejudice, selection and racism is equally present in going for marriage not arranged.
My point is that in in blame game, as I explained to Punjabn, passing on the buck to Aryans and British must be judged rationally in addition to looking at your own choices in the name of survival of the fittest. No wonder, my numero uno Guru said: ``Life is dukha because of interdependent arising.`` Best way to deal with it is to consider nothingness and formlessness of its nature as its essence.
#75 Posted by Urstruly on November 4, 2002 9:06:01 am
Following is an article from ZAHRA JAMSHED, who used to be a regular interlocutor at Chowk sometimes ago; but then she left in protest against the male chauvnism and bigotry shown to decent and self-respecting ladies at this forrum by some (supposedly) men.
SOUTH ASIAN WOMEN`S FORUM
http://209.185.240.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=157f9a3f1b426cf78403011822441870&lat=1036428712&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2esawf%2eorg%2fnewedit%2fedit11042002%2freflections%2easp
(she is quite a looker also; I had no idea)
#74 Posted by khamkhwa. on November 4, 2002 8:12:20 am
#59
[There have been thousands upon thousands of marriage in Bangladesh between Urdu & Bengali .]
...and the offspring is called..UNGLI ;)
[There have been thousands upon thousands of marriage in Bangladesh between Urdu & Bengali .]
...and the offspring is called..UNGLI ;)
#73 Posted by bagha on November 4, 2002 8:04:51 am
very good article!
ha, i`m black, i`m bong, and man, am proud of it!
all those who clamour to be white like aryans, arabs, persians and brits can go to hell! ;)
ha, i`m black, i`m bong, and man, am proud of it!
all those who clamour to be white like aryans, arabs, persians and brits can go to hell! ;)
#71 Posted by stuka on November 4, 2002 7:43:18 am
Saminasha:
The term ``wheatish complexion`` actually means dark. Fair means wheatish and very fair means fair. It`s kinda like stock recommendations by Analysts; you have to discount by one. Like Hold = Sell, Buy = Hold, Strong Buy = Buy etc.
The term ``wheatish complexion`` actually means dark. Fair means wheatish and very fair means fair. It`s kinda like stock recommendations by Analysts; you have to discount by one. Like Hold = Sell, Buy = Hold, Strong Buy = Buy etc.
#70 Posted by tahmed32 on November 4, 2002 7:43:18 am
Saminasha #65 To say ``black is beautiful`` is as superficial as to say ``gora rang is beautiful``. You live (or work) closely with an individual for a few days, and color of skin, nationality, etc. recedes in the background and the personality, intelligence of that person become important.
#69 Posted by rsaxena on November 4, 2002 7:43:18 am
re: zafar
{Arrey, phir vahi badtameezi! Mian, kabhi kabhi likhne ke pahle sochiye tho.}
...kyon bhains ke aage baansri baja rahe hain aap?... :)...that buffalo is incorrigible...
{Arrey, phir vahi badtameezi! Mian, kabhi kabhi likhne ke pahle sochiye tho.}
...kyon bhains ke aage baansri baja rahe hain aap?... :)...that buffalo is incorrigible...
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- Shah2: Re: # 639 #637 What were... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- Goldfinger: Re: # 654 "Yeh,... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- Shah2: UMGRATEFULL This was your... An Indian Muslim
- Shah2: We gave you one... An Indian Muslim
- nkg: Re: # 202 Parde... If some... An Indian Muslim
- nkg: Re: # 178 zeena(h)... "Both India... An Indian Muslim
- Eklavya: Pardesi and salimbro Ms Dawa... An Indian Muslim
- nkg: live as nuicense creator... An Indian Muslim








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content