unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Forgive me, Danny

Aisha Sarwari March 2, 2003

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 24-40   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

#25 Posted by adnan_rafiq on March 3, 2003 10:59:43 am
Sarwari: Nice poem. Don`t worry about the saffron brigade trying to find faults in a sincere apology. These are the same people who accuse moderate Muslims of not speaking out against terrorism or the attrocities committed in the name of our religion. But, when someone does, its readily interpreted as appeasement. Damned if we do, damned if we don`t! Clearly, there is a much more deep-rooted insecurity and complex at work here which does not let our neighbors enjoy their recent success. Tsk, tsk, tsk...

As for the mullah brigade, how does mourning Pearl`s death suggest that the poet is disregarding the deaths of her fellow countrymen? Those who think that the poem was written because the victim was white are practicing racism themselves. Daniel Pearl was a human being and the horrendous circumstances surrounding his death should sadden anyone regardless of race, religion or nationality.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#26 Posted by Urstruly on March 3, 2003 11:00:20 am

ahamadzai & sobia

Our country is in deep shit because we have been told since the day one, to shut up and bear the ``injustice`` for the good times that never comes. We lost half of the country because we were made to shut up at the injustices of haramzadas who rule us. The history of 1971, repeated itself and a 16 year long civil war is being fought in Karachi where people had to go through the worst ethnic cleansing and genocide (of Mohajirs) by the state, and we were told to shut up. How the hell is this country going to be better off, when we have turned it into Pinochet`s Chile where kidnapping and murder by state is business as usual. How the hell is our country better off, when it has no constitution and there hasn`t been any legislation for the past 4 years. Beats me. The only people who are better off are the military who are richer, have more land, and are more powerful then ever before. What about Paksitanis- yes they are better off committing suicides.

The people of US might be safe in their country with anti-Muslim discriminatory laws and turning their country into police state under department of homeland security, but what about us. They are fighting their wars in our countries. where is our homeland security? we don`t have resources to save us from our own government, Americans and the people who are fighting Americans- who the hell is going to save us? where do we turn to?

Human beings have rights, period. There is no compromise on that. ``Some idiots`` have rights too. Jeffery Dhamers, Milosovics, Modis, Vajpayees, advanis and Javed Iqbals have rights too. It is a right of fair trial in an open court of justice. That is what makes us civilized and them the terrorists - being civilized comes at a price; if we can`t pay the price we have no right to call ourselves civilized. People of Paksitan have rights too - to live like human beings and not like cattle, under constitution, which military has always used as a toilet paper; and which they swore that they would protect with their lives. There is no compromise on constitutional rights - what it means is that the haramzadas who are running our country have to work harder - instead of chewing on our juglars they should stand up for us (and not for US). That is what they swore that they would do. isn`t it?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#27 Posted by TahirMirza on March 3, 2003 11:34:41 am
It looks like the killing of Daniel Paarl was the biggest tragedy, poems are being written and numerous articles appearing in various vernaculars all over the world. Not surprising, there is a picture of Daniels Pearl’s wife holding a baby in the Time Special issue. Why is so much importance given to the death one human, whereas thousands of deaths, those who died under the carpet of US bombs in Afghanistan or Iraq or some other part of the world go unnoticed. Forgive me all those people who were killed by the US bombs, there is no poem written for you…
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#28 Posted by Ahmadzai on March 3, 2003 12:42:32 pm
Urstruly:

Honestly speaking, the points you have raised have remarkable similarities with Indians` position on the interactive boards of this site when they are thrashing Pakistan. But no hard feelings, please.

Kindly note that:

1. Mohajirs never went through any genocide. Their two factions have killed more of the Mohajirs between them than all of them killed by any other party, including Hindus and Sikhs at the time of partition. Mohajirs were the most educated people and that was their competitive edge. Mr. Altaf Hussain thought to answer Jaheliet of arms toting groups with Jahiliet of his own, letting all Mohajir youngsters to take arms too. Having shunned their competitive edge, Mohajirs are the real loosers under the leadership of Mr. Altaf Hussain.

2. I see a good future of Mohajirs, because Mr. Hussain now has competition from MMA. Both parties have to deliver. And deliver they will. Competition for economic betterment is the name of the game.

3. Do you have real figures about suicides per capita for various countries of the region? Please tell me how many suicides took place in the entire of Pakistan in the year 2002 (or 2001 for that matter)? How many people do you know, who know some one, who know some one .... who has committed suicide ( I am referring to 6 degrees of separation).

4. If Americans are fighting their war on Pakistani soil, they are also fighting their war on many other countries` soils too. Are those countries making any noise? they have dictatorships. Amongst Muslim countries, only Malaysia and Pakistan are making enough noise.

5. The current PML Q Government has adequately stood up for Pakistanis` cause. Not a single other Muslim country worked so hard on INS registration law as did our leadership. This has been acknowledged by American newspapers too. Our leadership is also appropriately resisting American arm twisting on Iraq war. It has raised the issue of Kashmir at each and every forum of the world, has raised the issue of injustice to Pushtoons of Afghanistan, has clearly denied American military`s pursuance of terrorists into Pakistan, etc.

I hope you understand. Please acknowledge good deeds vis-a-vis other comparable Governments.

Again, no hard feelings, please:)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#29 Posted by tahmed32 on March 3, 2003 12:42:33 pm
adnan_rafiq #24 you write ``Those who think that the poem was written because the victim was white are practicing racism themselves. Daniel Pearl was a human being and the horrendous circumstances surrounding his death should sadden anyone regardless of race, religion or nationality. ``
Your post provides a befitting response to posters who think that because Danny Pearl was white or jewish his death should not be mourned. To say that hundreds are killed every day and so one death should not be mourned, which is essentially what these people are saying, is the worst possible reasoning I can think of. As Umarmurtaza wrote earlier, if you cant say express sorrow at anyone`s death, then you should keep silent.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#30 Posted by adnan_rafiq on March 3, 2003 1:47:37 pm
ahmadzai: I agree with your assessments regarding MQM and PML-Q`s efforts vis-a-vis the INS registration. Altaf Hussein has destroyed an entire generation while sitting pretty in London. His campaign was a perfect example of the saying that `violence only breeds violence.` However, one must not be too quick to put the blame entirely on the shoulders of MQM and Mohajirs. Many of their grievances were real, but instead of painting the fight as a fight against the establishment, Altaf pitted the Mohajirs against their fellow Pakistani brothers, especially the Punjabis. This is where the whole equation got corrupted IMO. But, the attrocities committed by Benazir and Naseer-ullah Babar during the early nineties come very close to the definition of genocide. Extra-judicial killings, false arrests, harassement of family members, intimidation of local newspapers, etc. were the order of the day during their time. Perhaps, a more balanced approach would divide the blame equally between MQM and the establishment.

The other thing that I do not agree with is your proclaimation that since Mohajirs were the most educated they had a competitive edge which they lost due to their leadership`s incompetence. This is akin to saying that a bullfighter has an edge in the arena because he plays excellent chess. Anyone who has been following our society and economy can testify that education is the last thing that provides any sort of edge in a society ruled by military, feudals and mullahs. In fact, education is an anathema to the survival of our privileged classes. No sir, in Pakistan, being educated is not an asset but a liability. That`s why the educated class always has been and will be persecuted. Altaf Hussein did not have the vision to see it as a war against the triumvirate of fedual, general and mullah. Instead, he filled his coffers by turning Mohajirs against Sindhis, Punjabis and Pathans and vice versa. Hopefully, the young generation of Karachi will realize the blunders made by their elders and work toward a common goal of harmony with other ethnicities instead of staying locked in a fruitless confrontation and an endless circle of violence.

On a side note: Although, not a Bihari myself, I am well aware of the plight of Biharis stranded in Bangladesh. These people, who still call themselves Pakistanis, have been in limbo for decades now. While our government spends millions of dollars in the name of Kashmir, none of us can find even a shred of sympathy for our unfortunate brothers rotting in Bangladeshi camps.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#31 Posted by sattar2 on March 3, 2003 4:56:01 pm

Urstruly Sahib (Re #26):

The expletives you used for the military dictatorship … also aptly describe the nature of your mullah. Let’s not forget the role of religious fanaticism in the current mess across the globe.

You plead your case on basis of human rights and civility … while you continue to support oppression and injustice … of course, in the name of Islam. This includes your support for anti-Ahmadi legislation, support for killings on grounds of apostasy and blasphemy, calls for jihad against polytheists, and much more.

It is foolish for one to practice hatred and oppression … and expect the outcome to be based on justice and civility. If you fail to appreciate this basic point … you’ll continue to degenerate intellectually, morally, and emotionally.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#32 Posted by hxn on March 3, 2003 8:45:25 pm
sobia #22

you just don`t get it, do you?...

pearl`s murder got worldwide coverage not b/c he`s white or jewish but b/c his slaying is emblematic of the hatred that is pakistan and, i`m sorry to say, 21st century islam. you guys hate everyone - the west, americans, indians, the jews, yourselves - you name it - and the problems of the muslims and pakistanis are everyone else`s fault but yours, right?

no atrocity is too horrific for you to minimize, right sobia? not 9/11, not pearl. all you have to say is ``palestine`` or ``everyone hates muslims.``

i don`t hate muslims...but people who can minimize pearl`s brutal slaughter? there`s something seriously wrong with their wiring...although when i think about the state pakistan is in, it explains a lot...

you see, pakistan is in the shape its in not b/c of corrupt politicians or military dictators or even muslim terrorists - it is the embodiment of human misery and failure precisely b/c of people like you

...who tolerate and embrace this hatred

...and who just don`t get it.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#33 Posted by Urstruly on March 3, 2003 8:45:25 pm

Sattar

You are a liar and a slanderer. You lie knowingly and therefore, lose respect with people. I oppose anti-ahmadi legislation and called it anti-Islamic and anti-constitutional and you know it. I do not support killing or death penalty for blasphemy as you must have read in my artcle on blasphemy law. As a matter of fact I oppose death penalty for any crime including that for a rapist and murderer of a 7 year old; and I have argued that in the article and in the debate that followed. I think one who lies is the one who practices hatred. May Lord cleanse your heart of this hatred for the people who do not share your belief and show you the light.



http://63.194.130.82/cgi-bin/show_article.cgi?aid=00001344&channel=university%20ave&start=620&end=629&page=63&chapter=7#33
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#34 Posted by tahmed32 on March 4, 2003 3:03:24 am
sattar2: Please excuse this interruption to the scholarly debate between you and urstruly. I happened to come across this post from our old (but young) friend anNy that was addressed to you on another board:

#113 by anNy on March 3, 2003 9:07am PT
excuse digression please
------
sattar2
can u please email me at annythedud@yahoo.com ASAP.
Thanks




reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#35 Posted by Ahmadzai on March 4, 2003 3:03:24 am
Adnan Rafiq at # 30:

Your analysis is good since it departs from the blame game.

Just fyi, when I was referring to education as a competitive edge for Mohajirs, I had Sindh`s urban areas in my mind. There is no denying the fact that it was educated `Mohajirs` who were driving the economic prosperity of these areas and of Pakistan in general through their mid and senior management skills.

About Beharis, they settled in East Pakistan and should have become its citizens. Its like expecting Afghan Mohajirs settled in Pakistan to extend them our citizenship too. As it is, none of them wants to return. Hence, the incentivization by UN to send them back.

But I agree with you that a solution should have been found for their absorption by Pakistan-BD joint efforts.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#36 Posted by jay on March 4, 2003 3:03:24 am
UNDP and honour killings



The undersigned organizations are deeply disappointed by the response given by the UNDP representative to the open letter by Ms Faryal Gauhar. Several rights organizations have already registered their concern with the UNDP and the Planning Commission, Government of Pakistan, over the inclusion of Sarwar Khan Mohmand in the meeting organized by both these agencies in Islamabad on Feb 6.

Samia Sarwar`s murder put the spotlight on the practice of honour killing in Pakistan. International and national human rights forums, including human rights mechanisms of the United Nations, have voiced their condemnation and concern over this practice.

///The day that aisha dedicated this poem to the dead daniel pearl, in pakistan pak govt has appointed a person implicated in the killing of samia sarwar to a senior position in a fitting tribute to honour killing in pakistan. Aisha, you have the pulse of the pak people.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#37 Posted by jay on March 4, 2003 3:03:24 am
FORGIVE ME SAIMA,

i KNEW THAT you AN EDUCATED WOMAN sAIMA

was killed in the office of our

great human rights activist asma jahangir,

I know saima that our

elected reps refused to condemn the killings,
I know saima that you died in vain,

I know saima that the it is legal to kill women,

I know saima that all that you wanted aws
to get away from your lecherous husband,

I know saima that you died for something so simple,

But saima, I am an educated pakistani
education can make no change to the social values imbibbed through my mothers milk,

I am a proud pakistani and I cannot go against the book,
and I know that ny country is an islamic one,
please understand that I am a proud pakistani,
pl know that I respect the laws of pakistan
and no one was arrested for your killing and I feel no sorrow for you,
because that is the law and that is pakistan.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#38 Posted by Sobia on March 4, 2003 3:03:24 am
re: hxn

you guys hate everyone - the west, americans, indians, the jews, yourselves - you name it - and the problems of the muslims and pakistanis are everyone else`s fault but yours, right?//

Nope, don`t hate anyone...not the Americans, not the Jews and no, not even the Indians, though you`re very surprised to hear that, aren`t you? Because since I`m Pakistani and Muslim, YOU assume I hate everyone because that`s what you`re fed through your media and politicians. I think what`s happening to the Muslims all over the world is as much their fault as anyone`s. In fact, we’re more to blame and the sad reality is, we’re not doing anything about it. I also believe what`s happening to Pakistanis is also to a large part our own fault. But that`s not the point. The point is that there`s a proverb in Urdu: Jis ki laathi, uss ki bhains - the person who has the power rules the world. I`m not resenting anyone their power, but I don`t believe in justifying the ABUSE of power, as is seen time and again all over the world. And power IS abused when people die in other parts of the world and their deaths are not even worth a grain of salt, as compared to what happens to someone who happens to belong to the most powerful country in the world. The truth is that Danny Pearl got the coverage BECAUSE he was who he was. Any other person who had been killed this way would NOT have been given this much importance – again, power play. Who is downplaying Pearl’s murder? Not me. I don’t say he should’ve been killed, I don’t say his murder is justified. All I’m saying is there is NO justification for ANYONE’s killing, be it Pearl’s or someone in the Gaza strip. Now whether you understand what I’m trying to say or you keep on lambasting me is your prerogative.

Re: ahmedzai

If the Pakistanis being caught are innocent, the injustice will lose. Justice will win. Eventually, all of them will be free. Let us just swallow our pain for a while and prepare ourselves for the future.

Sorry for being cynical, but I don’t think justice wins all the time. In fact, more often than not, it doesn’t, especially when those in power don’t know the meaning of the word, and don’t care to find out – unfortunately!

Tahmed32:

because Danny Pearl was white or Jewish his death should not be mourned. To say that hundreds are killed every day and so one death should not be mourned, which is essentially what these people are saying, is the worst possible reasoning I can think of//

Because Pearl was white and Jewish is because his death got the coverage it did, which is lucky for him. If he had been a coal black African, it wouldn’t have made it to the back pages of the Daily Hicksville Times, Michigan. But it’s not about NOT mourning him…it’s about mourning JUST him and ignoring the rest of the world’s plight. There’s a difference.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#39 Posted by harish_hyd on March 4, 2003 3:03:24 am

#24 by adnan_rafiq on March 3, 2003 10:59am PT

[Don`t worry about the saffron brigade trying to find faults in a sincere apology. These are the same people who accuse moderate Muslims of not speaking out against terrorism or the attrocities committed in the name of our religion. But, when someone does, its readily interpreted as appeasement. Damned if we do, damned if we don`t! Clearly, there is a much more deep-rooted insecurity and complex at work here which does not let our neighbors enjoy their recent success]

My dear Adnan, what about your own countrymen who have expressed their disagreement over this ode to Daniel Pearl? Will you accuse them of being RAW agents?

Your own low self-esteem is exposed when you define terrorism committed in the name of religion as condemnable only when the victims are the goras, not the countless ordinary victims of terrorism that are commonplace in Pakistan.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#40 Posted by adnan_rafiq on March 4, 2003 8:28:01 am
re ahmedzai #38
[ ... About Beharis, they settled in East Pakistan and should have become its citizens. Its like expecting Afghan Mohajirs settled in Pakistan to extend them our citizenship too. As it is, none of them wants to return. Hence, the incentivization by UN to send them back. ...]

Hunh? I`m sorry but your argument makes no sense. Those Biharis were `Pakistani` citizens living in East Pakistan. Its not a question of whether we should extend them our citizenship or not - they already ARE citizens. On the other hand, Afghan Mohajirs were never Pakistani to being with, so you are really comparing apples to oranges here. And, they ALL want to return, thats why they are living in refugee camps in Bangladesh and not in Dhaka or Chittagong.

P.S. On a personal note, however, I am in favor of extending our citizenship to those Afghanis who have lived in Pakistan for more than ten years. Their children and families are well grounded in Pakistani cities and it would be cruel to send them back to a place where they have (at least for now) no future.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 24-40   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Interact Index

    #114 leo
    #113 sarwar
    #112 nasah
    #111 Ahmadzai
    #110 arjun_m
    #109 Ahmadzai
    #108 Tipu
    #107 Manjit
    #106 Androscoggin
    #105 arjun_m
    #104 Tipu
    #103 arjun_m
    #102 pmishra2
    #101 Ahmadzai
    #100 Ahmadzai
    #99 Ahmadzai
    #98 jay
    #97 Manjit
    #96 Tipu
    #95 Manjit
    #94 arjun_m
    #93 sattar2
    #92 Urstruly
    #91 Tipu
    #90 YLH2
    #89 Tipu
    #88 harish_hyd
    #87 jay
    #86 jay
    #85 pmishra2
    #84 pmishra2
    #83 Tipu
    #82 Urstruly
    #81 sattar2
    #80 tahmed32
    #79 arjun_m
    #78 arjun_m
    #77 Ahmadzai
    #76 adnan_rafiq
    #75 Urstruly
    #74 stuka
    #73 stuka
    #72 stuka
    #71 pmishra2
    #70 arjun_m
    #69 Urstruly
    #68 adnan_rafiq
    #67 Ahmadzai
    #66 arjun_m
    #65 pmishra2
    #64 jay
    #63 jay
    #62 sattar2
    #61 tahmed32
    #60 sadna
    #59 hxn
    #58 sadna
    #57 arjun_m
    #56 tahmed32
    #55 arjun_m
    #54 temporal
    #53 hxn
    #52 temporal
    #51 tahmed32
    #50 pmishra2
    #49 sadna
    #48 arjun_m
    #47 adnan_rafiq
    #46 sattar2
    #45 Sobia
    #44 arjun_m
    #43 tahmed32
    #42 temporal
    #41 jay
    #40 adnan_rafiq
    #39 harish_hyd
    #38 Sobia
    #37 jay
    #36 jay
    #35 Ahmadzai
    #34 tahmed32
    #33 Urstruly
    #32 hxn
    #31 sattar2
    #30 adnan_rafiq
    #29 tahmed32
    #28 Ahmadzai
    #27 TahirMirza
    #26 Urstruly
    #25 adnan_rafiq
    #24 Ahmadzai
    #23 semipreciousme
    #22 Sobia
    #21 harish_hyd
    #20 Ahmadzai
    #19 arjun_m
    #18 jay
    #17 rozaiba
    #16 Sobia
    #15 no_more_a_slave
    #14 Piscatiqua
    #13 Urstruly
    #12 Urstruly
    #11 ana_dobarah
    #10 UmerMurtaza
    #9 UmerMurtaza
    #8 taimurmalik
    #7 tahmed32
    #6 tahmed32
    #5 er
    #4 temporal
    #3 Ras
    #2 mansourhallaj
    #1 mansourhallaj

Latest Interacts

  • Saleem_Chauhan: the whole world is... The Future of Indo
  • laddu: Re: # 40. it is... The Future of Indo
  • tahmed32: and as for this... Pleas For Sanity as
  • tahmed32: #173 GT: In other... Pleas For Sanity as
  • GT: tahmed: You are simply a... Pleas For Sanity as
  • Pew_Research: Following a visit to... Pleas For Sanity as
  • tahmed32: #170 is to GT... Pleas For Sanity as
  • tahmed32: #164 "Indian chowkies offering... Pleas For Sanity as

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • An Indian Muslim
  • India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in Pakistan for Mumbai mayhem
  • Pleas For Sanity as Sabres Rattle Over Mumbai Mayhem
  • Terror in Mumbai.....and also in 'Bannu or somewhere'
  • The Future of Indo Pak Conflict
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Wake up Deluded Humans
  • Calligraphy of Coils
  • And now, the army!
  • Taxicab Hiccups
  • Is Science a Religion?

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited