Babar Hashmi May 24, 2003
#49 Posted by Tipu on May 31, 2003 12:18:19 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#48 Posted by faziiet on May 31, 2003 10:26:33 am
I have a question, if anyone can help me, I`d be most appreciative. I`m writing a satire and needed to know the name of an Indian musician/singer who used to be prominent on MTV India some years back... I believe she may have hosted some programs, too...
I thought her name was Rageshwari. But I have now heard that there was also a Rajeshwari. And even a Rajeswari.
This is all monumentally confusing. If anyone can clear this up: The musician I had in mind was pretty young (well, five years ago) and seemed to be prominent on the channel, so I`m thinking she must be in the pop music scene.
Thanks.
I thought her name was Rageshwari. But I have now heard that there was also a Rajeshwari. And even a Rajeswari.
This is all monumentally confusing. If anyone can clear this up: The musician I had in mind was pretty young (well, five years ago) and seemed to be prominent on the channel, so I`m thinking she must be in the pop music scene.
Thanks.
#47 Posted by Studebaker on May 30, 2003 2:26:34 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#46 Posted by Studebaker on May 30, 2003 2:26:34 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#45 Posted by shah. on May 30, 2003 1:27:24 pm
stuka ji
I can explain a part of 12-head`s statement. No party other than the communists can possibly win in West Bengal because all the elections in Bengal are heavily rigged by the commies. Stalin had instructed the Indian leftists to subvert the democratic system from within rather than trying for a revolution. I guess that`s what they are doing.
regards
I can explain a part of 12-head`s statement. No party other than the communists can possibly win in West Bengal because all the elections in Bengal are heavily rigged by the commies. Stalin had instructed the Indian leftists to subvert the democratic system from within rather than trying for a revolution. I guess that`s what they are doing.
regards
#44 Posted by stuka on May 30, 2003 12:21:15 pm
Studebaker:
``In the end of it al ,i think 1/2 of Partitions already un done .....
Lets see how bjp cancome to bengal ..... ``
Explain the above two statements.
``In the end of it al ,i think 1/2 of Partitions already un done .....
Lets see how bjp cancome to bengal ..... ``
Explain the above two statements.
#43 Posted by Studebaker on May 30, 2003 10:29:30 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#42 Posted by arjun_m on May 30, 2003 8:08:02 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#41 Posted by stuka on May 30, 2003 7:36:39 am
Sstudebaker: You are a liar. Sardar Patel encouraged others only when the choice became Pakistan or Civil War. From Syed Ali Khan IT IS YOUR MUSLIM leaders who always thought of themselves as MUSLIMS first and Indian second.
The Muslim League was founded by Muslim feudals much before Sardar Patel came on the scene. The vast majority of Muslims supported Pakistan till August 14, 1947. Iit is only on the 15th of August that Muslim League flags came down and Congress flags went up and a number of Muslims discovered secularism and one man one vote.
The biggest mistake the Congress government made, and the most unfair thing to Nationalist Muslims, was that it did not forcibly deport any and all members of the Muslim League to Pakistan. This left suspicion on those Muslims who were generally nationalist.
What did Sardar Patel have to do with the demand of seperate electorates?
What did Sardar Patel have to do with the demand for communal quotas?
The Cabinet Mission plan would have been disaster for Iindia. Even now I say it was better to accept partition than to perpetuate existence under the blackmail of the Muslim League.
The Muslim League was founded by Muslim feudals much before Sardar Patel came on the scene. The vast majority of Muslims supported Pakistan till August 14, 1947. Iit is only on the 15th of August that Muslim League flags came down and Congress flags went up and a number of Muslims discovered secularism and one man one vote.
The biggest mistake the Congress government made, and the most unfair thing to Nationalist Muslims, was that it did not forcibly deport any and all members of the Muslim League to Pakistan. This left suspicion on those Muslims who were generally nationalist.
What did Sardar Patel have to do with the demand of seperate electorates?
What did Sardar Patel have to do with the demand for communal quotas?
The Cabinet Mission plan would have been disaster for Iindia. Even now I say it was better to accept partition than to perpetuate existence under the blackmail of the Muslim League.
#40 Posted by stuka on May 30, 2003 7:36:39 am
Check this out...
``Some PROTECTION is needed from Haegonomy not necessarily boy cott but like Affirmative action,Subsidy to farmers ,Bilateral trade ..
In the whole picture the lesser the weaker( not inherently but neumericaly ) stand chance to be overwhelmed over run & open worl economy only favours multi natinal bIG large MORE capital ..as you know ``
Typical example of how Hindus should perpetually bend over and take it up the arse to help the ``weaker section of society``..
We are not falling for that shit any more. Pakistan and India are two soveriegn nations. We don`t owe them anything. Trade, cultural exchanges should take place on a basis of equality or not at all.
``Some PROTECTION is needed from Haegonomy not necessarily boy cott but like Affirmative action,Subsidy to farmers ,Bilateral trade ..
In the whole picture the lesser the weaker( not inherently but neumericaly ) stand chance to be overwhelmed over run & open worl economy only favours multi natinal bIG large MORE capital ..as you know ``
Typical example of how Hindus should perpetually bend over and take it up the arse to help the ``weaker section of society``..
We are not falling for that shit any more. Pakistan and India are two soveriegn nations. We don`t owe them anything. Trade, cultural exchanges should take place on a basis of equality or not at all.
#39 Posted by stuka on May 30, 2003 7:36:39 am
SammerJB: Your posts are logical, but you are different from the Ppaki mind set which is exemplified by the posts of 12 Head. Typically, there seems to be a sense of inferiority amongst Pakistanis. This translates in to a sense of righteousness in demanding special status, while justifying lack of reciprocity.
Also, economics is just one minor reason. The real reason Indian artists are banned is because the Paki establishment is too fearful of what beysharam beyhaya Indians will do the the Pakistan Ideology. If a Lahori singer can be taken to court for singing Kudiyan Lahore Deeyan, imagine the fear and nervousness Indian singers inspire in the bureaucrats and Guardians of Pakistan Ideology?
Also, economics is just one minor reason. The real reason Indian artists are banned is because the Paki establishment is too fearful of what beysharam beyhaya Indians will do the the Pakistan Ideology. If a Lahori singer can be taken to court for singing Kudiyan Lahore Deeyan, imagine the fear and nervousness Indian singers inspire in the bureaucrats and Guardians of Pakistan Ideology?
#38 Posted by Studebaker on May 29, 2003 10:35:38 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#37 Posted by ammaroo on May 29, 2003 8:36:16 am
there are numerous faults at both ends. india wont play cricket with pakistan (until such a time that they are sure of winning) and pakistan wud not allow indian movies to come to pakistan (until such a time that we start making better films). but atleast the artists (forward looking, peaceloving, enlightened) shudnt be saying such things. there are two things. 1, all indian artists are not such. nusrat fateh ali , junoon, nazia hassan are just some examples of times when pakistanis were welcomed with open arms in india. 2. indian artists like sukhbir, stereo nation, etc. who r uk based have been allowed in pakistan. even the bhangra king daler mehndi has visited from time to time. so all is not lost. pakistani singers, watever the restrictions, applaud and respect the genius of lata, rafi, kishore and the likes. the point the article tries to make is that if even the artists start to talk like politicians, all hope will be lost.
#36 Posted by Studebaker on May 28, 2003 1:24:25 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#35 Posted by friend on May 28, 2003 7:55:02 am
What a stupid article! Indian artists are banned from Pakistan for decades. Rather than giving his sermons to Pakistanis, author is reminding us of what Gandhi said!! Gandhi also said ``no partition`` and you never listened to him. Why are Pakistani so selective when they want us to follow Gandhi?
(BTW, This author looks like another incarnation of YLH)
(BTW, This author looks like another incarnation of YLH)
#34 Posted by m_souza on May 27, 2003 7:20:23 pm
#27 by dost-mittar on May 27, 2003 6:52am PT
Romair:
``One of the best articles I have read in a long time. Really puts things in perspective``
Is the dye-in-the-wool militarist now embracing a marxist-communist worldview?
-------------
Mayeb he is scared that once the feuding pakis and indians become pals..he would be left alone...so better change..or pretend to chagne slowly
Romair:
``One of the best articles I have read in a long time. Really puts things in perspective``
Is the dye-in-the-wool militarist now embracing a marxist-communist worldview?
-------------
Mayeb he is scared that once the feuding pakis and indians become pals..he would be left alone...so better change..or pretend to chagne slowly
Interact Index
Similar Articles
- Miley Sur Mera Tumhara Shantanu Dutta
- The Madness of Crowds Ejaz Haroon
- Why Do We Reject Our Past? Abdullah Rehman
- Guilty of Gohana Subhash Gatade
- On Tolerance Ayesha H Ahmad
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- borivili_express: om prakash would you... Pleas For Sanity as
- Aha_Snark: i'm sorry if my... Pleas For Sanity as
- om_prakash: Exceptional circumstances warrant exceptional... Pleas For Sanity as
- Aha_Snark: re: 189 om_prakash pretty sure... Pleas For Sanity as
- GT: tahmed sahib, I am sorry... Pleas For Sanity as
- om_prakash: Aha_Snark Go interview someone else.... Pleas For Sanity as
- Aha_Snark: Re: # 187 om_prakash What... Pleas For Sanity as
- om_prakash: Civilian courts are severely... Pleas For Sanity as








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content