Feroz R Khan July 7, 2003
#31 Posted by hrrehman on July 9, 2003 12:27:08 pm
#26 by arjun_m on July 9, 2003 10:18am PT
In your DREAMS, Hindu Boy.
Is that why your politicians beg US to stop Pak,
don`t have the guts to do it yourself, but we all knew that already.
If you didn`t have Sikhs in your Army, you wouldn`t have an Army.
Watch the BBC Documentry on your so called Commandoes and you
will be ashmed to call yourself an Indian. But again, maybe you already are.
You never answered my question, do u prefer white meat or dark meat?
In your DREAMS, Hindu Boy.
Is that why your politicians beg US to stop Pak,
don`t have the guts to do it yourself, but we all knew that already.
If you didn`t have Sikhs in your Army, you wouldn`t have an Army.
Watch the BBC Documentry on your so called Commandoes and you
will be ashmed to call yourself an Indian. But again, maybe you already are.
You never answered my question, do u prefer white meat or dark meat?
#30 Posted by hrrehman on July 9, 2003 12:27:08 pm
#28 by rsaxena on July 9, 2003 10:50am PT
Report on Cannibalistic Hindu Sect Angers Indian-Americans
http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=75d76922382397c522977234307aece1
Hey, my Hindu Boy, which one do you prefer,
white meat or dark meat?
Report on Cannibalistic Hindu Sect Angers Indian-Americans
http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=75d76922382397c522977234307aece1
Hey, my Hindu Boy, which one do you prefer,
white meat or dark meat?
#29 Posted by arjun_m on July 9, 2003 10:50:13 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#28 Posted by rsaxena on July 9, 2003 10:50:12 am
{Maybe you should come to India to see Niazi`s gun...the gun he surrendered to Aurora..along with 90,000 of pakilands ``brave`` men. }
...hahahahaa.....that must`ve set hrrehman`s beard on fire....
...hahahahaa.....that must`ve set hrrehman`s beard on fire....
#27 Posted by arjun_m on July 9, 2003 10:32:33 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#26 Posted by ferozk on July 9, 2003 10:18:25 am
re: tahmed32 # 16
What happened in Quetta seems to be the external spill over of the internal Afghan problems. Presently, the situation is very confused in Quetta, because of the administrative mistakes. The top police and civil officials were removed from their posts after the incident and new officers were posted. The newly arrived officals need to get familar with the local environment, before they can make any sense out of the situation and they will have to re-develop contacts in Quetta.
Indications point to Afghans due to a couple of reasons. One is the most logical and that is spill over effects of the jihad and the fact that Hazrara shias were targetted points to that explanation. The Taliban and those who support them are sunnis and when the Taliban were in power, they were responsible for the massacre of Hazaras in Mazar-e-Sharif. When the Taliban were defeated, the Hazaras took their revenge by killing the Taliban in Mazar-e-e-Sharif; the Hazaras are traditionally from Mazar-e-Sharif. This suggests that ithis is nothing more than ethnic revenge to settle old scores.
The second explantion suggests that those who killed the Hazaras in Quetta were reacting to the arrival of the Pakistani army into the tribal belt. Since November 2001, when Pakistani army first entered the FATA and till two weeks ago, when it entered Mohmand agency, the army is now deployed in the entire tribal belt and that area is under Pakistan. There is alot of resentment, because the tribal areas are the most profitable smuggling routes and points of egress for the drug trade out of Afghanistan. Remember, the use of drug exports out of Afghanistan has increased and the area under opium cultivation has increased. Afghanistan under the Karzai government is a net exporter of heroin in the international drug trade. This trade was monopolized by the warlords, who were using the income generated to fund their own private political fiefs. Apprently, the deployement of the Pakistani army has closed some of these routes and the killings in Quetta were a negative reaction to the loss of drug money by the warlords.
These are two most viable options, but can change as new developments come to light. It would have been better for all concerned if Jamali had openly said who was responsible, but openess in Pakistan has never been a virtue. Hence, the indications point towards an Afghan involvment. As to Jamali, remember he is a Baluch sardar and he has better access to intelligence in province, via family contacts than even the ISI!
Ciao
What happened in Quetta seems to be the external spill over of the internal Afghan problems. Presently, the situation is very confused in Quetta, because of the administrative mistakes. The top police and civil officials were removed from their posts after the incident and new officers were posted. The newly arrived officals need to get familar with the local environment, before they can make any sense out of the situation and they will have to re-develop contacts in Quetta.
Indications point to Afghans due to a couple of reasons. One is the most logical and that is spill over effects of the jihad and the fact that Hazrara shias were targetted points to that explanation. The Taliban and those who support them are sunnis and when the Taliban were in power, they were responsible for the massacre of Hazaras in Mazar-e-Sharif. When the Taliban were defeated, the Hazaras took their revenge by killing the Taliban in Mazar-e-e-Sharif; the Hazaras are traditionally from Mazar-e-Sharif. This suggests that ithis is nothing more than ethnic revenge to settle old scores.
The second explantion suggests that those who killed the Hazaras in Quetta were reacting to the arrival of the Pakistani army into the tribal belt. Since November 2001, when Pakistani army first entered the FATA and till two weeks ago, when it entered Mohmand agency, the army is now deployed in the entire tribal belt and that area is under Pakistan. There is alot of resentment, because the tribal areas are the most profitable smuggling routes and points of egress for the drug trade out of Afghanistan. Remember, the use of drug exports out of Afghanistan has increased and the area under opium cultivation has increased. Afghanistan under the Karzai government is a net exporter of heroin in the international drug trade. This trade was monopolized by the warlords, who were using the income generated to fund their own private political fiefs. Apprently, the deployement of the Pakistani army has closed some of these routes and the killings in Quetta were a negative reaction to the loss of drug money by the warlords.
These are two most viable options, but can change as new developments come to light. It would have been better for all concerned if Jamali had openly said who was responsible, but openess in Pakistan has never been a virtue. Hence, the indications point towards an Afghan involvment. As to Jamali, remember he is a Baluch sardar and he has better access to intelligence in province, via family contacts than even the ISI!
Ciao
#25 Posted by hrrehman on July 9, 2003 10:18:25 am
#21 by harish_hyd on July 8, 2003 11:23pm PT
Was that autopsy done by your Hindu doctors?
It`s not 10 Hindus you MORON, it`s 100 Hindus.
Don`t mess with the Pakistani Army Jawans.
Did you watch the BBC documentry on your so called commandos,
they looked too weak to even pick up a gun.
Also do something about you Migs, every week there is one falling
from the sky.
By the way do you prefer white or dark meat?
Was that autopsy done by your Hindu doctors?
It`s not 10 Hindus you MORON, it`s 100 Hindus.
Don`t mess with the Pakistani Army Jawans.
Did you watch the BBC documentry on your so called commandos,
they looked too weak to even pick up a gun.
Also do something about you Migs, every week there is one falling
from the sky.
By the way do you prefer white or dark meat?
#24 Posted by arjun_m on July 9, 2003 10:18:25 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#23 Posted by arjun_m on July 9, 2003 10:18:25 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#22 Posted by ferozk on July 9, 2003 10:18:23 am
re: tahmed32 # 16
I had left a reply, but apprently it has not been posted. I will wait for a day or two and if there is nothing, I will repost it. It was in reference to your question about indications pointing to an Afghan influence in the Quetta killings. The reply was posted nearly 10 hours ago!
Ciao
I had left a reply, but apprently it has not been posted. I will wait for a day or two and if there is nothing, I will repost it. It was in reference to your question about indications pointing to an Afghan influence in the Quetta killings. The reply was posted nearly 10 hours ago!
Ciao
#21 Posted by harish_hyd on July 8, 2003 11:23:10 pm
#20 by hrrehman on July 8, 2003 10:11pm PT
[No one can mess with the Pakistani Army.
THE BRAVEST MEN ON EARTH]
Is that why 93,000 Paki warriors, who were on a mission to purify the Bengali Muslim race, surrendered in shame in 1971, caught with their pants down?
[we don`t feed urine and cow dung to our soldiers like you guys]
Hey Osama, did you know that autopsies conducted on the bodies of the NLI soldiers during the Kargil war in 1999 revealed grass in their stomachs? Now I know the secret of the 1 Paki = 10 Hindus theory. It must be the grass!!!
[No one can mess with the Pakistani Army.
THE BRAVEST MEN ON EARTH]
Is that why 93,000 Paki warriors, who were on a mission to purify the Bengali Muslim race, surrendered in shame in 1971, caught with their pants down?
[we don`t feed urine and cow dung to our soldiers like you guys]
Hey Osama, did you know that autopsies conducted on the bodies of the NLI soldiers during the Kargil war in 1999 revealed grass in their stomachs? Now I know the secret of the 1 Paki = 10 Hindus theory. It must be the grass!!!
#20 Posted by hrrehman on July 8, 2003 10:11:42 pm
#9 by arjun_m on July 8, 2003 8:29am PT
No one can mess with the Pakistani Army.
THE BRAVEST MEN ON EARTH.
Don`t you remember putting million hindus on the
border and then retreating in shame. You guys didn`t move an inch
in to the Pakistani border. Pakistan Zindabad.
Just remember the thunder of Pakistani Army Jawans,
we don`t feed urine and cow dung to our soldiers like you guys.
No one can mess with the Pakistani Army.
THE BRAVEST MEN ON EARTH.
Don`t you remember putting million hindus on the
border and then retreating in shame. You guys didn`t move an inch
in to the Pakistani border. Pakistan Zindabad.
Just remember the thunder of Pakistani Army Jawans,
we don`t feed urine and cow dung to our soldiers like you guys.
#19 Posted by hrrehman on July 8, 2003 10:11:41 pm
#15 by arjun_m on July 8, 2003 2:21pm PT
Report on Cannibalistic Hindu Sect Angers Indian-Americans
http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=75d76922382397c522977234307aece1
Hey, my Hindu Boy, which one do you prefer,
white meat or dark meat?
Report on Cannibalistic Hindu Sect Angers Indian-Americans
http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=75d76922382397c522977234307aece1
Hey, my Hindu Boy, which one do you prefer,
white meat or dark meat?
#18 Posted by tahmed32 on July 8, 2003 2:57:50 pm
ferozk #13 you write ``As to the recent the killings in Quetta, the early indications point towards Afghans.``
That is what Jamali says too. But what exactly are these ``early indications`` that you talk about? Keep in mind that killing of shias has for years been one of the many ``pious`` activities that the terrorist organizations BRED AND NURTURED WITHIN PAKISTAN have been responsible for. I would like to see something more than Jamali`s self-serving statements on this matter.
That is what Jamali says too. But what exactly are these ``early indications`` that you talk about? Keep in mind that killing of shias has for years been one of the many ``pious`` activities that the terrorist organizations BRED AND NURTURED WITHIN PAKISTAN have been responsible for. I would like to see something more than Jamali`s self-serving statements on this matter.
#17 Posted by tahmed32 on July 8, 2003 2:57:50 pm
islam4ever #12 The answer to hindutvas is not to become like them. And there is no shortage of muslim extremists either, unfortunately.
#16 Posted by tahmed32 on July 8, 2003 2:57:50 pm
nazar #4 ``Musharraf should let secular and populous Benazir into the political fold - and close his eyes towards their corruption. Similarly, let Nawaz enter the fray. Let the genuine political forces handle this complicated situation.``
Why not simply separate Benazir and Nawaz from their political parties (as would be the case in any mature democracy, where political parties practice internal democracy and are not considered the personal fiefdoms of any individual)?? Do this and soon enough the (elected) party leaders who replace BB and NS will become national figures. Until that time, they will remain overshadowed by these two who have had more than enough chances to contribute something to Pakistan and failed.
Why not simply separate Benazir and Nawaz from their political parties (as would be the case in any mature democracy, where political parties practice internal democracy and are not considered the personal fiefdoms of any individual)?? Do this and soon enough the (elected) party leaders who replace BB and NS will become national figures. Until that time, they will remain overshadowed by these two who have had more than enough chances to contribute something to Pakistan and failed.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- krbhatti: Author, [The car is an... Losing the Battle, Losing
- nb: Akcheema, out of interest,... Rape Survivor Families Struggle
- tahmed32: #68 hamidm: i have... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- rahul_capri: This is the typical... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- KaalChakra: "Do you favour lynch... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- KaalChakra: re: # 58 Beej bhaiyya, You... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- hamidm2: tahmed mian, ......... i think... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- KaalChakra: "only raises this one... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content