unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

The changing face of America

Aliya Anjum October 9, 2003

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 16-32   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#168 Posted by tahmed32 on October 15, 2003 11:00:30 pm
veeresh #167 (yawn) latest absurdity from you is that my saying ``I don`t have the time to waste with you`` is an insult.

This is a statement of fact, not an insult. (Yawn).

next absurdity please ...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#167 Posted by veeresh on October 15, 2003 8:02:21 pm
tahmed 32 # 166 - when you run out of logic, you move to insults, right? ``I don`t have the time to waste with you`` is the best response when I ask you to explain a simple thing. Being condescending is equal to ignorance, right?

So. WHY is it that you, and some other educated people, will shed tears for Muslims in India . . . but ignore the realities facing Muslims in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Pakistan, Afghanistan?

Let me answer it, then, since you`ve chosen to not have the time . . .

a) because you don`t consider Muslim women to be Muslim enough.
b) because you don`t consider Muslims from some countries to be Muslim enough.
c) because you don`t consider Muslims who are from other sects Muslim enough.

So, point fingers at Gujarat. Point fingers at Indians across the board from your sanctimonious perch.

Now if I tell you what are facts, that so many of those killed in Gujarat were women who are treated like cattle in Islamic countries, so many of them were people from other States or countries who are treated like c/r/a/p in Islamic countries, so many of them were from sects which Islamic countries wouldn`t recognise . . . would you like to qualify your statement a bit to something like ``what is happening to people who may or may not be Muslims in Islamic countries is now happening to them in India also``, and that is sad, needs to be fixed?

Let us bring this discussion back to an even playing fiel, without you picking and choosing phrases - are Muslims treated better in India than in Pakistan (no response from you), Kuwait (no response from you), Saudia (no response from you) or USA implication Guantanamo Bay (again no response from you).

I say yes Indians including Muslims are treated better in India than they are in Saudia, Kuwait, Pakistan and USA = Guantanamo Bay. And I think the deafening silences from the usual rabid gangs on this board say something.

Ignore away, interim, as a Muslim resident of the US, what have you done to improve the lot of non-terrorist Muslims in Islamic countries?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#166 Posted by tahmed32 on October 15, 2003 12:04:50 pm
veeresh #163 Your evasion with reality is becoming quite extreme now: you actually compare the murder of innocent families in Gujarat with the incarceration of comabatants in Guantanamo? This is an insult you are adding to the injury of the innocent people killed in Gujarat. As a muslim resident of the US, I am very glad the US is taking strong action against terrorists, even if they claim to be muslims. I only wish the Pakistan government would have the moral fibre to do the same to terrorists in pakistan, and the Indian government would have the moral fibre to do the same to the murderers of muslim families in Gujarat. I wont say it is an affront to truth, because that seems to not concern you.

I wont go further down your post because i dont have the time to waste with you. But you write me another post coming up with another absurdity, and I will again point it out to you and ignore the rest of your post.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#165 Posted by concerned1 on October 15, 2003 11:52:56 am
the correct question is - would muslims be better off in any country other than india with the same set of parameters (pre-partition history of india, the partition in `47, creation of pakistan as a neighbor and its continued hostile actions, communal conflicts..majority of those initiated by muslims themselves)?

i think muslims would be treated worse in any country other than india...and that includes usa, canada, etc.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#164 Posted by pmishra2 on October 15, 2003 9:52:27 am
#159 Stuka

I accept your point that tahmed32 was quoting a rather strange passage from Veeresh (actually he modified it to be more general: minorities have it best in India, which is not the exact quote).

However, in no way does that reduce my belief that people who insist on comparing India to Sweden and Canada are indulging in silly propaganda. What kind of nonsensical comparison is this? Here we have a relatively democratic (yes, I am well aware of Gujarat and 1984 and Kashmiri pandit murders), relatively open country bordered by the most offensive tyrranies known to man:

China (brutal authoritarian state which has repeatedly practiced mass murder of its own citizens and minorities)
Pakistan (unique islamist-military dictatorship which supports worldwide terror)
Myannmar (hardline military dictatorship)

AND the main problem in the region is INDIA !! What kind of joke is this?

If people are serious about improving demcracy in South Asia then let us look at the region as a whole. If people are serious about rating indian democracy, then let us compare it to peers such as Turkey, Brazil, South Africa.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#163 Posted by veeresh on October 15, 2003 7:43:56 am
tahmed 162 . . . ok, let me start all over again:-

FORGIVE ME FOR ALL CAPS. I AM NOT SHOUTING. I CAN HARDLY RESTRAIN THE LAUGHTER THOUGH.

#90 by veeresh on October 12, 2003 2:38am PT
This article and the subsequent interacts brings out a few things which need to be stated in Black & White here:-

OBSERVATIONS.

a) Muslims and others seem to be treated better in the US than in Saudi Arabia, but they are treated the best in India.

THIS IS TRUE. IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE OBLIQUE REFERRENCE TO GUANTANAMO BAY VERSUS SAUDIA ARABIA WHICH IS LIKE A PERPETUAL LEASE TO USA, WHAT CAN I DO?

b) People want chocolates on the tray while flying, but will not buy them before boarding.

THIS IS TRUE.

c) Saudi Arabia`s economy is built around the Hajj, and they will not let that go, while in other religions you can have multi-location centres.

THIS IS TRUE.

d) Queen Latifa and Chaka Khan are not Muslim enough for more than a few other Muslims, worldwide. Nor is Mohamed Ali the boxer.

WHY DO WE IGNORE MUSLIMS OF AFRICAN DESCENT IN OUR VARIOUS HISSABS?

e) Everybody cries about a few hundred Muslim prisoners in Guantama Bay/Cuba, incuding latest the BBC, but nobody cares about the thousands including Muslims who dis-appear regularly in the jails of the Middle East Arabic countries.

(THERE ARE 5000 PAKISTANI MUSLIMS PRISONERS IN SAUDI JAILS ON DATE, KNOWN. HOW MANY MORE HAVE VANISHED WE DON`T KNOW)

+++
Sorry tahmed32, you and your TNT Godhra/Gujarat/Babri theories vanish in the face of the bandobast at Faizabad/Ayodhya earlier today. They vanish in the face of all the arguments offered by me.

Sorry about that.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#162 Posted by tahmed32 on October 15, 2003 6:58:23 am
veeresh #161 so, your latest cover-up attempt is to refer to what you said as ``sarcastic tongue in cheek reference `` on your part and ``pot shots`` at india by others. and some more preaching about muslim countries this and that.

i did not take any pot shots at india (and please cut and paste what i wrote if you think i did), and your boast about india being ``best`` in the world in treatment of muslims was not tongue in cheek.

i await your next coverup attempt...

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#161 Posted by veeresh on October 14, 2003 11:36:53 pm
tahmed32 post 157 - I personally view this constant barrage aimed at India on blots like Gujarat and Babri as an attempt by certain segments from the Muslims owing their allegiance to specific sects within the Islamic countries.

I see that yu, tahmed32, choose to ignore my sarcastic tongue in cheek reference to Saudi Arabia and USA in the same line, so maybe I should have spelt it out to you: - better than the following uSAs - Saudi Arabia (Aramco, USA), Kuwait (replacement for Subic Bay, USA), Pakistan (wannabe USA), Guantamo Bay (non USA permanent perpetual lease territory).

Now, from these US territories, their Islamic leaders take potshots at India and Indian Muslims. And I state, again and again, that Indians including Indian Muslims have it ``best`` out of these.

In this context, I asked you to define Muslim. You did, thank you. Here it is: ````a muslim is simply someone who believes in one God and considers the prophet muhammed to be A (emphasis added) messenger of God. ````


Now take that definition, and please tell me what percentage of Muslims will be better off if they :-

a) Try to get a visa to do the Hajj versus try to visit Ajmer / Hazrat Nizamuddin.

b) Have access to a common legal system in Kuwait versus India?

c) Openly declare their faith to different branches of Islam in Pakistan versus India?

d) Aim for the highest posts in Government, Business in Saudi Arabia versus the same in India, assuming they are citizens of the respective countries?

Re-arrange these any way you want, you get the drift?

And finally, I know everybody is reading poor Edward Said after he`s dead, but (e) how many Islamic Countries give anything more than lip service to Palestinian Refugees versus India?


+++

Mobs are mobs, and lose definition. I learnt this from family accounts of 1947, after some time it becomes contents of steel trunk and fair women. Sorry, but that`s the truth.

+++

It is about time Islam looked within. Otherwise it will keep whining about not getting chocolates on an aeroplane headed for the US, while denying bread to its own ``back home``.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#160 Posted by veeresh on October 14, 2003 9:52:17 pm
stuka 158 - my context to the treatment of Muslims in the USA was done with a sarcastic reference to Saudi Arabia as a ``non-territory`` of USA (similar to Guatanamo Bay, on perpetual lease), and I am quite sure tahmed32 also realises and knows that. Please grant me the strength of my convictions, as well as knolwedge of ground realities, in as much as the ``real`` USA is concerned?

dost-mittar 157 - sirji, a certain percentage of people will always be discontented. Minorities have the benefit of blaming it on being a minority. My ground view and not just of business leaders is that India is going through a phase where enterprise has its own rewards. Doling out favours to the majority by a government would be fine if it was the government that held the fiscal reins. Here everything is being privatised, the small businessperson never had it so good . . . where is the question of being discriminated if it is your brains and hands that make your future>
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#159 Posted by stuka on October 14, 2003 2:38:40 pm
PMishra:

``you make fake claims of India being the ``best`` in the world when it comes to treatment of minorities.
[end-quote]

Who has made this silly claim? Why should India be held to such an absurdly high standard? ``


Ahemmyou should have done some reading of the original posts before calling TAhmed Goebbelsian LOL!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#158 Posted by stuka on October 14, 2003 2:32:44 pm
Veeresh:

(I am and was not comparing any of ``our`` countries with the West.)


Okay. I will take your word for it, though your original statement did not lead to that understanding. I do not know about grassroots in the other countries and will therefore not argue with you. I took exception on the basis of USA, Canada etc.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#157 Posted by dost_mittar on October 14, 2003 12:15:27 pm
Veeresh#150
I am quite aware of the internecine fights among the sikhs during the 80s, especially the bloody feuds between the two groups lodged in the Golden temple led by Bhindrawalle and another by a Kirtani jatha led by a woman whose body was cut into several pieces by Bhindrawalle`s followers. But there was nothing new in this. The sikhs have been fighting among themselves since the time of the Sikh misals. But they were always able to forget their differences and come together to fight the common enemy. The events of 1984 presented that comon enemy.
I know that India is on the march and we all rejoice in it. I am also aware that ranbaxis, ciplas, wipros and zodiacs led by minorities are among the leaders in this march. But this does not mean that the sikhs and the muslims in general are quite contented in India or that their grievances are not qualitatively different from the grievances of others.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#156 Posted by tahmed32 on October 14, 2003 10:51:53 am
pmishra #151 you ask `` Who has made this silly claim? ``

veeresh. see my post #145 where I cutandpaste from his post #90 which he now denies writing.

I see you then proceed to attribute this ``silly claim`` to me. You can call me names too. That is all fine.

It gives me no joy to see veeresh avoiding truth. At least he is not as bloody minded as you are.

You on the other hand are a good example of the hate-filled thakeray crowd I never would have believed existed until I came to chowk. So, please dont try to engage me in further discussions. I wont lower myself into calling you names, but I have enough time to waste to keeping exposing your bs.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#155 Posted by Wahrheit on October 14, 2003 10:51:53 am
#144 Veeresh writes:
yes, there is and has been for the last few years now an ongoing illegal immigration of farm labour from Pakistan into India. It is an open secret. Into Rajasthan, Punjab and even Kutch.


The reality is quite different. 2 million Indians, Bangladeshis and Burmese are living illegaly in Karachi.

``Owing to the scale and diversity of the immigrant population, estimates of its size and composition remain rough. In Karachi, the largest segment – about 1.3 million – hails from Bangladesh, while totals from Africa, Burma and India reach into the hundreds of thousands``.

Link



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#154 Posted by tahmed32 on October 14, 2003 10:51:53 am
veeresh: They say that the reason Nixon ran into trouble was as much due to his cover-up attempts, as it was due to the watergate burglary itself. you are now doing the same:

all i am saying is that you were wrong in claiming india has the ``best`` record in the world. all you have to do is accept the fact that you went too far in claiming that, and we can call it quits.

or you can keep trying to cover up in different ways. one of which is to ask me to define muslim (this was funny first time, and is still funny). anyway: this is the third time you have come to me asking me to define ``muslim``, and once again i am telling you i have provided you with the definition (i wont bother to look up the post number anymore), and once again i will tell you that it is irrelevant what i or anybody else defines muslim to be: the hindutva mobs that burned muslim families to death in Gujarat did not need any definitions to identify muslims.

as i said to pmishra: i have lots of time to waste. you keep coming back, and i will keep correcting you. when you get tired, or when you realize that all i am asking you to do is to acknowledge the fact that you wrote what you wrote, and that what you wrote was incorrect. you do that, and we can all end this game and go home.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#153 Posted by soysauce on October 14, 2003 10:50:11 am
#150
tahmed32, you have still not been able to explain the term ``Muslim`` to this board, properly, in the context of the Gujarat dead or the Babri mosque. Well here is something for you to chew on - in some Islamic countries, the Gujrat dead or the Babri mosque would not have been Muslim. Right?

Veeresh, are you saying Gujarat killings had nothing to do with religion? I am flabbergasted...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 16-32   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #184 veeresh
    #183 tahmed32
    #182 veeresh
    #181 tahmed32
    #180 tahmed32
    #179 beenish
    #178 veeresh
    #177 tahmed32
    #176 veeresh
    #175 tahmed32
    #174 veeresh
    #173 soysauce
    #172 tahmed32
    #171 veeresh
    #170 tahmed32
    #169 veeresh
    #168 tahmed32
    #167 veeresh
    #166 tahmed32
    #165 concerned1
    #164 pmishra2
    #163 veeresh
    #162 tahmed32
    #161 veeresh
    #160 veeresh
    #159 stuka
    #158 stuka
    #157 dost_mittar
    #156 tahmed32
    #155 Wahrheit
    #154 tahmed32
    #153 soysauce
    #152 Wahrheit
    #151 pmishra2
    #150 veeresh
    #149 dost_mittar
    #148 tahmed32
    #147 veeresh
    #146 tahmed32
    #145 Fosa
    #144 veeresh
    #143 rsaxena
    #142 Pardesi
    #141 Romair
    #140 Romair
    #139 stuka
    #138 Pardesi
    #137 tahmed32
    #136 dullabhatti
    #135 veeresh
    #134 tahmed32
    #133 veeresh
    #132 ZahraJ
    #131 PM
    #130 Pardesi
    #129 stuka
    #128 shankar
    #127 dost_mittar
    #126 dost_mittar
    #125 Pardesi
    #124 tahmed32
    #123 tahmed32
    #122 tahmed32
    #121 anil
    #120 Fosa
    #119 veeresh
    #118 veeresh
    #117 veeresh
    #116 Pardesi
    #115 veeresh
    #114 pmishra2
    #113 rsaxena
    #112 Romair
    #111 tahmed32
    #110 tahmed32
    #109 ZahraJ
    #108 cosmic_citizen
    #107 arjun_m
    #106 hamidm2
    #105 Fosa
    #104 Fosa
    #103 ZahraJ
    #102 pmishra2
    #101 soysauce
    #100 veeresh
    #99 stuka
    #98 veeresh
    #97 tahmed32
    #96 veeresh
    #95 Romair
    #94 tahmed32
    #93 Naqshbandi
    #92 hamidm2
    #91 dost_mittar
    #90 veeresh
    #89 Romair
    #88 Fosa
    #87 sigalph235
    #86 ahmedmadani
    #85 ahmedmadani
    #84 ZahraJ
    #83 plats8
    #82 ZahraJ
    #81 rsridhar
    #80 tahmed32
    #79 Romair
    #78 ahmedmadani
    #77 Romair
    #76 hamidm2
    #75 ahmedmadani
    #74 ahmedmadani
    #73 arjun_m
    #72 ahmedmadani
    #71 ali_1
    #70 hamidm2
    #69 tahmed32
    #68 ZahraJ
    #67 ahmedmadani
    #66 Ahmadzai
    #65 tahmed32
    #64 tahmed32
    #63 tahmed32
    #62 Naqshbandi
    #61 Saminasha
    #60 SR
    #59 SR
    #58 ZahraJ
    #57 rsridhar
    #56 ZahraJ
    #55 Fosa
    #54 ussa
    #53 yantric
    #52 arjun_m
    #51 tahmed32
    #50 tahmed32
    #49 Ahmadzai
    #48 Ahmadzai
    #47 HisExcellency
    #46 whippinzed
    #45 Ahmadzai
    #44 arjun_m
    #43 arjun_m
    #42 tahmed32
    #41 gilthoniel
    #40 pmishra2
    #39 Ahmadzai
    #38 Romair
    #37 pmishra2
    #36 veeresh
    #35 Saminasha
    #34 tahmed32
    #33 arjun_m
    #32 arjun_m
    #31 arjun_m
    #30 veeresh
    #29 aquaris
    #28 ZahraJ
    #27 harish_hyd
    #26 bharatvaasi
    #25 jay
    #24 jay
    #23 harimau
    #22 harimau
    #21 tahmed32
    #20 veeresh
    #19 HisExcellency
    #18 Ajeet
    #17 tahmed32
    #16 Joyelle
    #15 rsaxena
    #14 rsaxena
    #13 sac
    #12 anurag
    #11 arjun_m
    #10 soysauce
    #9 Romair
    #8 arjun_m
    #7 stuka
    #6 temporal
    #5 Rakaposh
    #4 slacker
    #3 sigalph235
    #2 tahmed32
    #1 Romair

Latest Interacts

  • anil: Massaddi Mian: Please show me... Why is Karachi Turning
  • Ajeet: Now that Romair has... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
  • anil: Re: # 111 Kaal: "...they call... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
  • quin: Re: # 52 thanks... Translation of a (Love)
  • quin: I would like to... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: The hadith are the... Translation of a (Love)
  • dost_mittar: Eklavya#118: "The other option is... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
  • guru: Vedas(knoweldge of manifest) and... Dhokha and Being a

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Dhokha and Being a Muslim in India
  • Government Wins Manmohan Singh Loses
  • Why is Karachi Turning Into a Sell-Out?
  • Translation of a (Love) Letter by Allama Iqbal to Miss Atiya Faizi
  • Time for Musharraf to Quit
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • The Overlooked Problem of Pakistani Racism.
  • Please spare the poor animals this Eid!
  • Don’t Go to the Bathroom in India!
  • Swinging Cradles
  • In Defence of Desi Pun

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited