unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

The Nuclear Noose Around Pakistan’s Neck

Pervez Hoodbhoy February 2, 2004

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 48-64   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#301 Posted by Ahmadzai on February 6, 2004 10:14:35 am
Hip hip hurray.

Post # 300 (tripple century, sort of a milestone) was reached by an excellent, excellent, excellent post from Ijaz_Gul.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#300 Posted by Ahmadzai on February 6, 2004 9:31:50 am
Ram teri Ganga Meli or iss Meli ganga main sabb nangay hain

I normally don`t do this, but with due apologies I am copying and pasting News` editorial for only an easy read of the Chowkies. For days to come, Chowkies should hold their breaths for names of other European countries and underworld from across the globe, including India.

IAEA’s probe

The investigation launched by the International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) into the Europe specific nuclear black market will strengthen Pakistan’s case that the vast illicit market in Europe dealing in nuclear components needs to be mainly blamed for proliferation. President Pervez Musharraf had repeatedly pointed in this direction as it was unfair to blame any country when there already was a thriving clandestine nuclear market. IAEA’s probe, therefore, admits to a reality that had long been overlooked by the western countries in their zeal to blame states, Pakistan specially.

The IAEA’s letter to European governments seeking information regarding illegal transfer of nuclear technology to the so-called ‘rogue states’ should provide necessary information about the European individuals and firms. This information would be used by the Authority’s investigators as evidence of their involvement in trafficking of nuclear components to Iran and Libya. While this measure needs to be welcomed it does raise a question as to why the United Nations nuclear watchdog organisation did not exploit the information it already had before it started pointing a finger of guilt at Pakistan. In fact, The News’ European correspondent quoted sources as that ‘the IAEA is already in possession of some preliminary information about these European companies which will lead to further investigation into the affairs of some German, British, Dutch and French companies known for their dealings with Urenco, the European consortium which first designed nuclear enrichment.’ IAEA’s investigation aims at identifying the real culprits in the scandal in Europe.

It is to be seen to what extent will the Authority be ready to go in admitting its errors in wholly blaming Pakistan when it was already aware of the nuclear scandal extant in European. However, what will be still more important is that will the IAEA publicly reprimand those European states whose companies it finds were involved in illicit nuclear technology transfers in the manner it did while dealing with Pakistan’s involvement as alleged by Iran and Libya. There is urgent need to clear some of the confusion and reduce the level of alleged guilt.

It is unfortunate that the IAEA became cognisant to the massive nuclear black market in Europe only after Pakistan had raised the issue. The Authority’s chief Mohamad El Baradei has admitted that ‘considerable light on the global network has come from the IAEA’s verification of nuclear programmes of Iran and Libya.’ The point is that if it is open season for blaming states for involvement in the dirty business of proliferation then the nuclear watchdog must also drag the names of European states whose corporate sector’s hands were tainted. It might be recalled when the UN inquiry commission started probing Iraq’s secret weapons programme after the Desert War, the trail lead to several well known European and even American suppliers. The present nuclear scandal is not much different.

:-)


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#299 Posted by MaheshG2 on February 6, 2004 9:31:50 am
> so that you go through the Eco course in first year, where they use a Samuelson textbook.

That helped me not a whit. I am as clueless now about economics as I was then.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#298 Posted by ijaz_gul on February 6, 2004 9:31:50 am
I have followed Hoodbhoy`s pacificm in Pakistan for a very long time. He is indeed an avid PACIFIST and entiltled to his views but ought to also understand the meaning of independence. It ends where the other`s nose begins.
Just when this fiasco had just begun to unravel, I saw Hoodbhoy on a TV show hell bent on convincing that Pakistan as a State and Establishment were knee deep in Proliferation. Well there may be many who may think so but why damage the image of your country in the name of Value Neutrality. His solo in an internationally realist paradigm will neither do good to him nor to the motherland. It would have been more admirable if he had provided guidelines and inputs on how Pakistan should get out of this TWISTER.

I for one feel that the Government of Pakistan by admitting that its program was covert has taken a very bold stand. Declaring that the program is now ouvert means that Pakistan has commited itself to non proliferation rules of the game and hence scrutiny, which in any case was always there.

Perhaps many doomsday psuedos miss the point that Dr. Khan`s sole responsibility was enrichment and not weaponisation. That role was played by an entirely different organisation under the PAEC. Ouvert declaration perhaps also implies that Pakistan has also mastered the PU route and is now self sufficient. There was a big message when the President said that our capability has moved beyond the Minimum Deterrence.

I agree that the case is not closed and there will be tremendous pressure on Pakistan in the days to come. There will be caliberated, covert and coercive attemts to tame the Tiger. We as a nation will have to stand to it and not melt way like Saddam, Iran and Libya. I feel that given that Pakistan demonstrate responsibility and firmness on proliferation, route out of the woods would not be afar.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#297 Posted by tahmed32 on February 6, 2004 8:18:20 am
jay #292 you are misrepresenting my views on Qadeer - where do i call Qadeer a hero? Indeed, i think he has done grave damage not just in terms of making the world a more dangerous place through nuclear proliferation, but in terms of jeopardizing what i (as a pakistani) consider to to be the sacred cause of the defense of pakistan as well. And all this for purposes of increasing his personal wealth!! His apology is as hollow as is musharaff`s pardon.

Please criticize me for what I say. Not for views I oppose = you merely weaken your arguments when you are not careful with sticking to the facts.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#296 Posted by notme on February 6, 2004 7:57:28 am
It never ceases to amaze me how low we can stoop whilst playing this one-upmanship game that is countinually repeated at chowk.
Pakistan V. India is, as usual the constant theme-rerun below each and every article.
For example- gujjubania has more than 200+ anti pakistani posts to his credit, but not a single article, his contribution to chowk is limited to engaging in mind-bogglingly inane posts. Indeed, there are many more like him, on both sides.
dont you guys have anything else better to do?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#295 Posted by jang on February 6, 2004 7:57:28 am
foutainheader
(ayn rand?)
``North Korea is not being attacked because it has nukes that will blow Korea, Japan and Taiwan to smithereens if USA does something. ``

NK, although rattles its sabres, is known as real weak, and not sponsoring any problems for the US dierectly. Even close neighbor japan or SK does not face any present problems (e.g. terrorism). Unlike middle-eastern counties, NK is unlikely to cause problems in status quo of world energy markets. That is why US is happy to contain it. Its not the nukes.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#294 Posted by stuka on February 6, 2004 7:24:06 am
Fountain Header:#279, GOOD POST.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#293 Posted by jay on February 6, 2004 6:52:01 am
TNT minds,

tahmed is a classic example of the TNt mind. He knows that khan is a pak hero because he created the bomb, he has given pakistan a means to prosecute the doctrine of jihad under mushroom clouds. There is no considerations for the personal qualities, he made the hbomb consstant with the TNT. Abdus salam also was a great scientist, but his achieve,menys wre not consistant with TNT, he was not a muslim, no one in pakistan honours him, the ere is no laboratory named after him, while khan gets a lab.

Tahmed can only think in TNT terms, abdul kalam is made prsident because he made the missile. He can only extrapolate in his own terms, in TNT terms. He3 cannot recognise the human qualities, he cannot even imagine that very simple man, never married, always wore sandals till he became president, a non corruptible man could becom the president of india. It is the most disgusting m,anifestation of TNT mind that prompts comparison of khan with abdul kalam.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#292 Posted by whippinzed on February 6, 2004 6:52:01 am
mantolives, aka YLH, post 281

heard of fiction. That book is a piece of fiction and not an academic book. He is trying to be another lecarre - hey who knows guys like you and tahmed32 will make him one - since you guys are the ones who seem to be more excited about it than your average ram in india.

dear boy get those grey cells working - rethoric is fine but occasionally it makes look like a fool that you really are not!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#291 Posted by gujjubania on February 6, 2004 6:51:29 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#290 Posted by Ahmadzai on February 6, 2004 6:51:29 am
Nasah at 278:

``poor mr. musharraf...... ``

Would you please elaborate on your prophetic statement?

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#289 Posted by Ahmadzai on February 6, 2004 6:51:29 am
Emotionalism on part of Pakistanis and extremism on part of Chowk`s resident fundoo Indoos aside, the news from the daily News closes the chapter and lays out a promising future for Pakistan as follows:

ISLAMABAD: President General Parvaiz Musharraf has pardoned Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan on the recommendations of the Federal cabinet.

Earlier, the Federal cabinet, accepting the clemency application, recommended to President General Parvaiz Musharraf for pardoning the originator of the Pakistani nuclear programme, in view of his services rendered by Dr. Khan for the nation
The cabinet, which met in Islamabad with Prime Minister Zafarullah Jamali in the chair, thoroughly debated over the clemency application with regard to the transfer of atomic technology.

President Musharraf also informed newsmen that the atomic programme won’t be rolled back at any cost. The president said that Dr. Qadeer Khan was a national hero and he personal take him in high esteem, however national interests were more important than any individual. General Parvaiz Musharraf maintained that Dr. Qadeer was directly monitoring the Nuclear proliferation and a total of 11 persons were involved which include seven scientists.

Musharraf accepted the scientist`s plea for mercy after he admitted the leaks in a televised apology.

``There`s a written appeal from his side and there`s a pardon written from my side,`` Musharraf said at a news conference. On Thursday, Musharraf said he had sought to balance Pakistan`s domestic interests and international demands that proliferation activities be brought to light.

``Whatever I have done, I have tried to shield him,`` Musharraf said of Kahn, a national hero. But the president said ``one has to balance between international requirements and shielding.``

``You cannot shield a hero and damage the nation,`` he said.

Musharraf refused to give further details about the pardon, a decision that he said was made on the recommendation of the National Command Authority _ which controls the country`s nuclear assets _ and the Cabinet. Asked about Khan`s motives, Musharraf said: ``What is the motive of people? Money, obviously. That`s the reality.``

He said Pakistan wouldn`t submit to any U.N. supervision of its weapons program, and that no documents would be handed over to the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. He also ruled out an independent investigation of the military`s role in proliferation.

However, he said the IAEA was welcome to come and discuss the proliferation issue with Pakistan. ``We are open and we will tell them everything,`` Musharraf said.

The president reiterated Thursday there was no official involvement in proliferation. ``The reality is that the government is not involved and that the military is not involved,`` Musharraf said. ``It`s only the media that are saying this.

`` In order to become a nuclear power and address the imbalance of military power with rival India, Musharraf said Pakistan had needed people like Khan _ who operated covertly from the 1970s until the country`s first public nuclear test in 1998. ``In the covert period there was autonomy,`` Musharraf said. Khan was tasked to do something and he did it. One could not be that intrusive in case what you desired was not accomplished,`` he said.

Pakistan began its investigation in November after Iran told the U.N. nuclear watchdog it obtained nuclear technology from Pakistan.

An add from my side``: The President`s honesty can be determined from his outright `Khiraj-e-Tahseen` to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto on starting the nuclear program.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#288 Posted by fountainheader on February 6, 2004 6:51:29 am
gujjubania

Everything is fair if done keeping the country`s interest in mind . In my very humble way , I have tried to do that.

Even if one puts down your ``humble`` use of vulgarity to your overenthusiastic patriotism, your repeated insistence in quoting Purchasing Power Parity figures and extrapolating the Q3-FY04 8.4% growth shows your limited knowledge of macroeconomics. And your arrogant persistence shows your unwillingness to learn the right thing.

I hope you get into an IIT, so that you go through the Eco course in first year, where they use a Samuelson textbook.

Maybe you will learn that a GDP of $500 billion growing at 6.5-7% is quite impressive as well. And you shouldn`t quote the 3-trillion-ppp figure especially while referring to defence purchases.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#287 Posted by harimau on February 6, 2004 6:51:29 am
Refsadna #258

[I remember a Burmese colleague describing a (then) Burma-China face off at their borders. He said it didnot matter how hard the Burmese fought and how many Chinese soldiers they killed. They were so overwhelmingly outnumbered by the Chinese that all the Chinese had to do to invade the country was simply walk over the border.]

They already have done that. The Burmese government`s writ doesn`t run all over the country and the border areas with China are peopled by various rebellious tribes anyway. The Chinese (civilians) have settled in large numbers in border villages and towns and there is no way they are going to be dislodged.

All countries bordering China are stupid for not to have secured their borders first. The first order of business for the Chinese was to reach the border and start nibbling -- as India found out in Aksai Chin. It is stupid to dismiss the area as a wasteland ``where not a blade of grass grows`` as Indira Gandhi once said. Who knows what mineral deposits are there that might be worth billions?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#286 Posted by harimau on February 6, 2004 6:51:29 am
As usual, Indians have missed the boat. When it was known that China was feeding nuclear weapons know-how to Pakistan, India should have delivered similar data to the Taiwanese, totally frustrating Chinese ambitions to take over Taiwan by hook or crook. Instead, the stupid Indian government played by the rules of the West (which of course is conveniently changed to suit the times) and did not proliferate. If Taiwan had the bomb now, Japan and South Korea would have developed the bomb by now and we would have some tamasha in China`s northern border. If there is one thing the Chinese fear, it is a re-armed Japan.

Now it is going to be well nigh impossible to pay the frikkin Chinese back in their own coin. At least the Pakistanis tried and I for one am thankful that the Pakistanis did what the Indians didn`t have the guts for.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 48-64   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #349 Ranjha
    #348 mumbaikar
    #347 rajsinghi1
    #346 XeroxKhan
    #345 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #344 mumbaikar
    #343 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #342 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #341 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #340 mumbaikar
    #339 mumbaikar
    #338 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #337 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #336 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #335 mumbaikar
    #334 aquaris
    #333 sadna
    #332 Assad_K
    #331 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #330 sadna
    #329 tahmed32
    #328 rsridhar
    #327 ironman
    #326 rsridhar
    #325 Assad_K
    #324 Assad_K
    #323 Layman
    #322 ironman
    #321 tahmed32
    #320 tahmed32
    #319 Assad_K
    #318 Assad_K
    #317 Assad_K
    #316 tahmed32
    #315 arjun_m
    #314 harimau
    #313 tahmed32
    #312 tahmed32
    #311 tahmed32
    #310 Tmk
    #309 AlephNull
    #308 ijaz_gul
    #307 Indian
    #306 fountainheader
    #305 MaheshG2
    #304 gujjubania
    #303 sadna
    #302 MaheshG2
    #301 Ahmadzai
    #300 Ahmadzai
    #299 MaheshG2
    #298 ijaz_gul
    #297 tahmed32
    #296 notme
    #295 jang
    #294 stuka
    #293 jay
    #292 whippinzed
    #291 gujjubania
    #290 Ahmadzai
    #289 Ahmadzai
    #288 fountainheader
    #287 harimau
    #286 harimau
    #285 tahmed32
    #284 arjun_m
    #283 echoboom
    #282 MantoLives
    #281 MantoLives
    #280 gujjubania
    #279 fountainheader
    #278 mumbaikar
    #277 nasah
    #276 stuka
    #275 rsridhar
    #274 rsridhar
    #273 mumbaikar
    #272 mumbaikar
    #271 rsridhar
    #270 arjun_m
    #269 arjun_m
    #268 Pankaj
    #267 AlephNull
    #266 AlephNull
    #265 sadna
    #264 mohar11
    #263 mohar11
    #262 mohar11
    #261 concerned1
    #260 plats8
    #259 jang
    #258 sadna
    #257 gujjubania
    #256 MaheshG2
    #255 bongdongs
    #254 tahmed32
    #253 bongdongs
    #252 jang
    #251 jay
    #250 MaheshG2
    #249 rsridhar
    #248 arjun_m
    #247 ferozk
    #246 AlephNull
    #245 AlephNull
    #244 AlephNull
    #243 gujjubania
    #242 ballukhan
    #241 rsridhar
    #240 AlephNull
    #239 AlephNull
    #238 AlephNull
    #237 AlephNull
    #236 tahmed32
    #235 tahmed32
    #234 tahmed32
    #233 rsridhar
    #232 rsridhar
    #231 rsridhar
    #230 fountainheader
    #229 chaltahai
    #228 stuka
    #227 fuzair
    #226 AlephNull
    #225 fountainheader
    #224 fountainheader
    #223 arjun_m
    #222 fountainheader
    #221 MaheshG2
    #220 PM
    #219 fountainheader
    #218 fountainheader
    #217 tahmed32
    #216 tahmed32
    #215 plats8
    #214 jang
    #213 arjun_m
    #212 whippinzed
    #211 tahmed32
    #210 tahmed32
    #209 tahmed32
    #208 arjun_m
    #207 jang
    #206 Ralph
    #205 tahmed32
    #204 hossp
    #203 whippinzed
    #202 Maharana
    #201 mog
    #200 tahmed32
    #199 arjun_m
    #198 nazarhayatkhan
    #197 arjun_m
    #196 tahmed32
    #195 arjun_m
    #194 rsridhar
    #193 tahmed32
    #192 tahmed32
    #191 rsridhar
    #190 ferozk
    #189 rsridhar
    #188 arjun_m
    #187 rsridhar
    #186 whippinzed
    #185 arjun_m
    #184 Urstruly
    #183 ferozk
    #182 AlephNull
    #181 whippinzed
    #180 AlephNull
    #179 AlephNull
    #178 fuzair
    #177 fountainheader
    #176 tahmed32
    #175 MantoLives
    #174 ballukhan
    #173 ballukhan
    #172 plats8
    #171 hossp
    #170 sadna
    #169 tahmed32
    #168 rafay_alam
    #167 tahmed32
    #166 tahmed32
    #165 Heathcliff
    #164 stuka
    #163 Maharana
    #162 Assad_K
    #161 HumaMir
    #160 fuzair
    #159 Layman
    #158 fuzair
    #157 Shamsul
    #156 soysauce
    #155 tahmed32
    #154 nakhok
    #153 rsridhar
    #152 arjun_m
    #151 whippinzed
    #150 malik99
    #149 hamid_shahid
    #148 mohar11
    #147 mohar11
    #146 AlephNull
    #145 soysauce
    #144 soysauce
    #143 Assad_K
    #142 tahmed32
    #141 whippinzed
    #140 JiyaJale
    #139 sadna
    #138 tahmed32
    #137 dullabhatti
    #136 jang
    #135 tahmed32
    #134 malik99
    #133 soysauce
    #132 stuka
    #131 rsaxena
    #130 deeJay
    #129 sadna
    #128 stuka
    #127 dullabhatti
    #126 soysauce
    #125 JiyaJale
    #124 tahmed32
    #123 tahmed32
    #122 wajahat
    #121 gujjubania
    #120 veeresh
    #119 rsridhar
    #118 tahmed32
    #117 sadna
    #116 MantoLives
    #115 whippinzed
    #114 rsridhar
    #113 tahmed32
    #112 sadna
    #111 tahmed32
    #110 ferozk
    #109 fountainheader
    #108 wajahat
    #107 shankar
    #106 shankar
    #105 ballukhan
    #104 tahmed32
    #103 tahmed32
    #102 arjun_m
    #101 rafay_alam
    #100 arjun_m
    #99 arjun_m
    #98 arjun_m
    #97 arjun_m
    #96 pmishra2
    #95 arjun_m
    #94 arjun_m
    #93 tahmed32
    #92 rsaxena
    #91 dialogue
    #90 baaghiraja
    #89 tahmed32
    #88 ferozk
    #87 sadna
    #86 veeresh
    #85 AlephNull
    #84 sunlight
    #83 AlephNull
    #82 faisaluno
    #81 sunlight
    #80 gujjubania
    #79 MantoLives
    #78 hossp
    #77 pmishra2
    #76 nazarhayatkhan
    #75 rajsinghi1
    #74 tahmed32
    #73 tahmed32
    #72 Layman
    #71 tahmed32
    #70 AlephNull
    #69 ironman
    #68 veeresh
    #67 arjun_m
    #66 arjun_m
    #65 Ralph
    #64 chaltahai
    #63 arjun_m
    #62 arjun_m
    #61 tahmed32
    #60 temporal
    #59 jang
    #58 kaurasach
    #57 arjun_m
    #56 tahmed32
    #55 Romair
    #54 stuka
    #53 Romair
    #52 rsaxena
    #51 arjun_m
    #50 chaltahai
    #49 chaltahai
    #48 tahmed32
    #47 arjun_m
    #46 SameerJB
    #45 tahmed32
    #44 tahmed32
    #43 mumbaikar
    #42 Godot
    #41 hossp
    #40 leah
    #39 hamidm2
    #38 arjun_m
    #37 arjun_m
    #36 arjun_m
    #35 Ralph
    #34 chaltahai
    #33 mohar11
    #32 Zakkk
    #31 chaltahai
    #30 echoboom
    #29 tahmed32
    #28 Ahmadzai
    #27 wajahat
    #26 wajahat
    #25 Godot
    #24 hossp
    #23 stuka
    #22 Urstruly
    #21 Naqshbandi
    #20 hamidm2
    #19 arjun_m
    #18 _digit
    #17 Maharana
    #16 Ahmadzai
    #15 SameerJB
    #14 wajahat
    #13 jay
    #12 Ahmadzai
    #11 nasah
    #10 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #9 MNIPhirSay
    #8 rozaiba
    #7 arjun_m
    #6 Zakkk
    #5 wajahat
    #4 PM
    #3 tahmed32
    #2 ferozk
    #1 MantoLives

Latest Interacts

  • ahmedmadani: This read remembers me... Roshni
  • quin: Asif, I am glad... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: quin: thanks for your... Translation of a (Love)
  • quin: I don't know why... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: I wrote 'love' in... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: Tahir, I apologise for calling... Translation of a (Love)
  • chaltahai: masadi, how would you... Translation of a (Love)
  • mullah_toofani: Masadi baitay, You seem like... Translation of a (Love)

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Dhokha and Being a Muslim in India
  • Why is Karachi Turning Into a Sell-Out?
  • Government Wins Manmohan Singh Loses
  • Time for Musharraf to Quit
  • Fields Of Joy
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • The Judge
  • Status of Parents in Al-Quran
  • Upon the return of a Desi
  • Nuclear Tests in Pakistan
  • Climate Controlled

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited