Shandana Minhas February 11, 2004
#124 Posted by shazbaz on September 17, 2004 10:25:07 am
``Not many, however, have any real clue as to what exactly they would do with limitless personal freedom once they got it.``
I have a very good idea what I would do with limitless personal freedom: I would do exactly what I am doing living here in Chicago, IL, where no one cares what I do or why I do it. I have so much personal freedom here, more than I would ever get anywhere else, except for maybe some hole six feet under, and that is the way I like it. Although I take issue with the assumption that `limitless personal freedom` is some kind of thing to be laughed at, I do not think that is the best thing for a country like Pakistan right now. It could complicate things even more than now.
I have a very good idea what I would do with limitless personal freedom: I would do exactly what I am doing living here in Chicago, IL, where no one cares what I do or why I do it. I have so much personal freedom here, more than I would ever get anywhere else, except for maybe some hole six feet under, and that is the way I like it. Although I take issue with the assumption that `limitless personal freedom` is some kind of thing to be laughed at, I do not think that is the best thing for a country like Pakistan right now. It could complicate things even more than now.
#123 Posted by FatimaNR on June 25, 2004 12:10:14 pm
It`s rare I`ve come across someone who`s come out of the elite (so to speak) and had the guts to say it like it is. Honey. I salute you. You go girl!
#122 Posted by tobateksingh on May 6, 2004 8:06:38 am
Shandana,
odd, but an uncle at the ripe old age of 60 made the same point recently... (he was quoting an Ayaz Amir article he had read in March...)
liked your three points:
1. lack of inner depth
2. perpetual cribbing (leading, largely, from #1)
3. the ``desire`` polarity (I find this arguable, in that perhaps this is not the only dichotomy, specially given the various brands of liberals and mullahs, but as generalisations go, I suppose, you`re right.)
interesting that this should only rate a 3... a function of the readership - largely English-speaking, largely abroad and resorting to chowk to stay in touch and hence not too sure how this applies ``back home`` anymore? or just plain in denial?
best,
Aman
odd, but an uncle at the ripe old age of 60 made the same point recently... (he was quoting an Ayaz Amir article he had read in March...)
liked your three points:
1. lack of inner depth
2. perpetual cribbing (leading, largely, from #1)
3. the ``desire`` polarity (I find this arguable, in that perhaps this is not the only dichotomy, specially given the various brands of liberals and mullahs, but as generalisations go, I suppose, you`re right.)
interesting that this should only rate a 3... a function of the readership - largely English-speaking, largely abroad and resorting to chowk to stay in touch and hence not too sure how this applies ``back home`` anymore? or just plain in denial?
best,
Aman
#121 Posted by kaptain on March 25, 2004 2:38:47 pm
FIRST TIME..GOT IN GULBERG..NICE..
THE TOPIC..WAS NICE..WORDINGS..TOO GOOD..BUT I GOT CONFUSED..
AND CONFUSED..TO THE EXTENT THAT I WENT ALL OVER TO THE END..NOW THIS WRITER`S ABILITY TO KEEP ME GLUED..JUST TO CHECK WHAT CATHARSIS..DID REALLY THE WRITER WANTED..
ANYWAYS..INDEED..INSPIRING..PIECE..HERE...APPRECIABLE.INDEED..AND LIVING..TO THE FORE..
KAPTAINE`..
THE TOPIC..WAS NICE..WORDINGS..TOO GOOD..BUT I GOT CONFUSED..
AND CONFUSED..TO THE EXTENT THAT I WENT ALL OVER TO THE END..NOW THIS WRITER`S ABILITY TO KEEP ME GLUED..JUST TO CHECK WHAT CATHARSIS..DID REALLY THE WRITER WANTED..
ANYWAYS..INDEED..INSPIRING..PIECE..HERE...APPRECIABLE.INDEED..AND LIVING..TO THE FORE..
KAPTAINE`..
#120 Posted by mubakr on March 17, 2004 6:41:27 am
Dear XeroxKhan:
I dont like Shireen Mazari either but partner, we should not become what she is while contradicting or criticizing her. While doing so, we may lose our point: even condemnation should not fall below the level of sophistication.
Hope I am not sounding offensive here but believing in the beauty of words and miracles they can show, I was pushed to request you style even while condemning.
Best,
I dont like Shireen Mazari either but partner, we should not become what she is while contradicting or criticizing her. While doing so, we may lose our point: even condemnation should not fall below the level of sophistication.
Hope I am not sounding offensive here but believing in the beauty of words and miracles they can show, I was pushed to request you style even while condemning.
Best,
#119 Posted by XeroxKhan on March 10, 2004 8:53:01 am
Then there is this joker of a woman; Dr. Shireen Mazari``. Apparantly she heads some institute that looks after, and justifies the Pakistan Army/Rightwing agenda. She is shrill, vociferous, argumentative, and a liar; highly desirable traits, especially to prop up the present regime of Mr. Mush. She is expert in twisting the facts to please Musharraf (god knows where both of them would end-up after the Dems recover the Whitehouse?). In the article published in ``Nation``, she is lamenting the audacity of Nayyar report on the state of education (ha!) in Pakistan.
http://www.jang-group.com/thenews/mar2004-daily/10-03-2004/oped/o3.htm
It seems that Prof Nayyar has stepped on her tail. she has been coming out and swinging like a ``Cheap Ladakoo Bazari Laundiya``. I doubt whether she reads the garbage that is being spewed out by her. She is definitely in need of a thorough colonoscopy to check her brain functions.
I have ``googled`` her name and have come across the the lies she is spreading, her hatered for democratic values, compassion toward humanity in general; and poor Pakistanis in particular. She wants to keep the madrassah curriculum intact -may be she is on the take of petrodollars, may be she is in cahoots with Usama, Al Qayda, and Taleban. What ever it is, she is bad for Pakistan.
Dont you all agree?
http://www.jang-group.com/thenews/mar2004-daily/10-03-2004/oped/o3.htm
It seems that Prof Nayyar has stepped on her tail. she has been coming out and swinging like a ``Cheap Ladakoo Bazari Laundiya``. I doubt whether she reads the garbage that is being spewed out by her. She is definitely in need of a thorough colonoscopy to check her brain functions.
I have ``googled`` her name and have come across the the lies she is spreading, her hatered for democratic values, compassion toward humanity in general; and poor Pakistanis in particular. She wants to keep the madrassah curriculum intact -may be she is on the take of petrodollars, may be she is in cahoots with Usama, Al Qayda, and Taleban. What ever it is, she is bad for Pakistan.
Dont you all agree?
#118 Posted by stuka on February 18, 2004 8:40:17 am
Echoboom:
``There is plenty of such material you read here about Pakistan but our Indian (especially hindu) friends clam up on these matters and keep posing as latter-day Krishna-Menons. ``
HAHAHA!! Okay. That was funny btw. Okay, I will shut up and read harappa.com
``There is plenty of such material you read here about Pakistan but our Indian (especially hindu) friends clam up on these matters and keep posing as latter-day Krishna-Menons. ``
HAHAHA!! Okay. That was funny btw. Okay, I will shut up and read harappa.com
#117 Posted by Ralph on February 17, 2004 9:06:05 pm
Stuka
That discussion can be very long. Some other time :)
That discussion can be very long. Some other time :)
#116 Posted by echoboom on February 17, 2004 8:39:51 pm
Stuka:
Yaar achhi khaasi dosti ubb HaRRapa naa kr dainaa.
You know we Indian-Pakis who are Vilayat-palat OR in Vilayat have this imported-leadership syndrome.
Everyone thinks that once he has been foreign, he must be a latter-day Jinnah or Gandhi and like a Messiah has acquired all the intellectual werewithal to deliver the masses from eons old HaRRapaas or KhujraaOs and drag them out kicking and screaming into the spaceage.
But to install a jet-engine on a bullock cart will not work--nor doing away with the bullocks.
Please do not drag this subject into the ``Front-Page Malaise``. Tell me something which you might think mundane & ordinary but to us be something of a discovery.
For example for me it was a very eerie experience to see thousands of monkey chattering along road-side trees at dusk. The langoors at Akbars` tomb was a very unique site. Domestic pigs roaming around Mohallas was a total shock to me. You understand?
There is plenty of such material you read here about Pakistan but our Indian (especially hindu) friends clam up on these matters and keep posing as latter-day Krishna-Menons.
Yaar achhi khaasi dosti ubb HaRRapa naa kr dainaa.
You know we Indian-Pakis who are Vilayat-palat OR in Vilayat have this imported-leadership syndrome.
Everyone thinks that once he has been foreign, he must be a latter-day Jinnah or Gandhi and like a Messiah has acquired all the intellectual werewithal to deliver the masses from eons old HaRRapaas or KhujraaOs and drag them out kicking and screaming into the spaceage.
But to install a jet-engine on a bullock cart will not work--nor doing away with the bullocks.
Please do not drag this subject into the ``Front-Page Malaise``. Tell me something which you might think mundane & ordinary but to us be something of a discovery.
For example for me it was a very eerie experience to see thousands of monkey chattering along road-side trees at dusk. The langoors at Akbars` tomb was a very unique site. Domestic pigs roaming around Mohallas was a total shock to me. You understand?
There is plenty of such material you read here about Pakistan but our Indian (especially hindu) friends clam up on these matters and keep posing as latter-day Krishna-Menons.
#115 Posted by stuka on February 17, 2004 7:08:51 pm
Ralph: I am not sure if Chusni and Echoboom are the same person. Actually, even if they are, I am not surprised one bit. If you read our history, the more orthdox Muslims got along fine with Gandhi. Gandhi`s vision of India was essentially a religious one, and he made a connection with the Maulanas.
What do you think YLH keeps shouting about? It is India that has moved away from Gandhi. In fact, Indians today are far closer to the modern, rule of law quoting Jinnah rather then Gandhi the instigator we pay lip service to.
Think about it, and we can discuss it further if you like.
What do you think YLH keeps shouting about? It is India that has moved away from Gandhi. In fact, Indians today are far closer to the modern, rule of law quoting Jinnah rather then Gandhi the instigator we pay lip service to.
Think about it, and we can discuss it further if you like.
#114 Posted by solitude on February 17, 2004 9:42:37 am
My dear dandy shandy,
Is this a call to arms ? Why don`t you make it so ? Say it nicely and gently push us in that direction.
In the interim, I understand the frustration :) Do something about it. I just started a movement called the secular pakistan movement. Join us or start your own in your mohallah :)
Is this a call to arms ? Why don`t you make it so ? Say it nicely and gently push us in that direction.
In the interim, I understand the frustration :) Do something about it. I just started a movement called the secular pakistan movement. Join us or start your own in your mohallah :)
#113 Posted by Ralph on February 16, 2004 10:57:17 pm
stuka
Dude, don`t you find it strange that someone like chusni/echoboom quotes Gandhi and Frontier Gandhi when it suits his purpose? I do.
Dude, don`t you find it strange that someone like chusni/echoboom quotes Gandhi and Frontier Gandhi when it suits his purpose? I do.
#112 Posted by Ras on February 16, 2004 9:30:43 pm
It is great to know your enemy but
it is also wise to watch your friends.
Ras
#111 Posted by stuka on February 16, 2004 6:46:32 pm
echoboom: That Harappa.com is an awesome site dude. Thanks for sharing. :)
#110 Posted by stuka on February 16, 2004 6:44:02 pm
Ralph:
Abey are you the Christian equivilant of Bin Laden? You used to be a fairly lucid chap. What happened.
Echoboom: Thanks boss.
Abey are you the Christian equivilant of Bin Laden? You used to be a fairly lucid chap. What happened.
Echoboom: Thanks boss.
#109 Posted by Ralph on February 15, 2004 3:21:24 pm
#106 #107
The only thing worse than Pakistanis quoting Gandhi is bringing Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan and his family into their discussions. At least Gandhi was spared the privilege of being imprisoned and nationally maligned by them.
The only thing worse than Pakistanis quoting Gandhi is bringing Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan and his family into their discussions. At least Gandhi was spared the privilege of being imprisoned and nationally maligned by them.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- CreateAlpha: Lawyers movement was a... Morality of Lawyers' Movement
- tahmed32: jay thakery: you were... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
- CreateAlpha: Oh and one other... Uneven Democracy : The
- Skeptical: I really do not... Morality of Lawyers' Movement
- tahmed32: So the lawyer's movement... Morality of Lawyers' Movement
- CreateAlpha: I think Romair has... Uneven Democracy : The
- muqaddam: A simplistic view of... Crowning of a Crony
- nemesis3: #38 Posted by Pardesi... Uneven Democracy : The








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content