Dee Ahmed April 8, 2004
#18 Posted by hamidm2 on April 9, 2004 4:23:31 pm
......... i just can`t get over it !!!
Do you remember,
When I ran out in the rain one day
When my tears were no different from the ones the sky was shedding that day
When I swore to You that I would never believe in You again
For you stood there while I cried, winced and whimpered in pain
You watched and waited till I could cry no more,
To lift my spirit up enough to see the shore,
.......... i am convinced that this standing in the rain stuff is inspired by fat bridget jones`s diary .........unless it is about noah .................... and pray, what the heck was the sky crying about? .......... and just because you accidently ended one line with ``more`` does not mean you have to use the word ``shore``...... how contrived! how transparent !........ and lazy too ......... there was no mention of an ocean or a sea unless, of course, the sky and our lovely poetess cried up a river !............ how stupid of me! ......... the writer seems to suggest: ``dear reader, you are so stupid that i conjured up this little ditty of little meaning knowing full well that you will read all kind of meaning into it and proclaim me to be a great poetess``.............
Do you remember,
When I ran out in the rain one day
When my tears were no different from the ones the sky was shedding that day
When I swore to You that I would never believe in You again
For you stood there while I cried, winced and whimpered in pain
You watched and waited till I could cry no more,
To lift my spirit up enough to see the shore,
.......... i am convinced that this standing in the rain stuff is inspired by fat bridget jones`s diary .........unless it is about noah .................... and pray, what the heck was the sky crying about? .......... and just because you accidently ended one line with ``more`` does not mean you have to use the word ``shore``...... how contrived! how transparent !........ and lazy too ......... there was no mention of an ocean or a sea unless, of course, the sky and our lovely poetess cried up a river !............ how stupid of me! ......... the writer seems to suggest: ``dear reader, you are so stupid that i conjured up this little ditty of little meaning knowing full well that you will read all kind of meaning into it and proclaim me to be a great poetess``.............
#19 Posted by FarzanaVersey on April 10, 2004 12:00:55 am
hamidm2:
You, sir, need to run out in the rain one day. People do that, you know...normal, ornery folks -- of course some of us are over-ambitious and imagine that in doing so we will win wet T-shirt contests or break into song...but there are some who feel differently, and become one with nature. If you understand the worth of manure, you must accept this as well.
I have yet to see someone NOT interested in poetry try and deconstruct it in such minute detail. I do have issues with this poem, and the poet will have reasons for having written certain lines in a certain way...therefore I am not defending anything, and defence is not even needed...
Metaphors are poetry`s lifeline. So what was the sky crying about? The poet has made her tears and the sky`s one...another poet may have said that the sky could not control its bladder...
[and just because you accidently ended one line with ``more`` does not mean you have to use the word ``shore``...... how contrived! how transparent !........ and lazy too ......... there was no mention of an ocean or a sea...]
Poetry does use rhyme; there was a time when only rhyming verse was considered poetry. And transparency is a GOOD thing. What`s with you? Why must there literally be a sea for there to be a shore? A shore here is a destination, something to return to. You have a problem with ``soiled sand`` and asked elsewhere, ``what is next?..... ``wet water?``..........``
While water is `naturally` wet, not all sand is `naturally` soiled.
Strange that the issues I have with this poem, despite some wonderful lines, is that it is too simple! Also, I do not connect with the subject...that is my problem, not the poet`s. You have said this poem is ``pretentious, schmaaltzy``...this is a contradiction in terms, even if not obviously so. You cannot fake goose-bumps. And a pretentious person will not even try to be schmaaltzy...s/he will make every attempt to be clever or so terribly `simple` that you can see through the effort. This poem is not pretentious. It could be termed schmaaltzy, though.
If you want poetry to be ``almost like prose``, then should you not, using your own logic, expect it to be `transparent` and stand up as prose instead of getting `contrived` into a poetic form? I am sooo angry, so here...
Where is that verse I wrote last night
About my missed flight
And how I would crash into the clouds
Making them cry out aloud
Over my poetic plight
Oh, save me, my wayward knight!
You, sir, need to run out in the rain one day. People do that, you know...normal, ornery folks -- of course some of us are over-ambitious and imagine that in doing so we will win wet T-shirt contests or break into song...but there are some who feel differently, and become one with nature. If you understand the worth of manure, you must accept this as well.
I have yet to see someone NOT interested in poetry try and deconstruct it in such minute detail. I do have issues with this poem, and the poet will have reasons for having written certain lines in a certain way...therefore I am not defending anything, and defence is not even needed...
Metaphors are poetry`s lifeline. So what was the sky crying about? The poet has made her tears and the sky`s one...another poet may have said that the sky could not control its bladder...
[and just because you accidently ended one line with ``more`` does not mean you have to use the word ``shore``...... how contrived! how transparent !........ and lazy too ......... there was no mention of an ocean or a sea...]
Poetry does use rhyme; there was a time when only rhyming verse was considered poetry. And transparency is a GOOD thing. What`s with you? Why must there literally be a sea for there to be a shore? A shore here is a destination, something to return to. You have a problem with ``soiled sand`` and asked elsewhere, ``what is next?..... ``wet water?``..........``
While water is `naturally` wet, not all sand is `naturally` soiled.
Strange that the issues I have with this poem, despite some wonderful lines, is that it is too simple! Also, I do not connect with the subject...that is my problem, not the poet`s. You have said this poem is ``pretentious, schmaaltzy``...this is a contradiction in terms, even if not obviously so. You cannot fake goose-bumps. And a pretentious person will not even try to be schmaaltzy...s/he will make every attempt to be clever or so terribly `simple` that you can see through the effort. This poem is not pretentious. It could be termed schmaaltzy, though.
If you want poetry to be ``almost like prose``, then should you not, using your own logic, expect it to be `transparent` and stand up as prose instead of getting `contrived` into a poetic form? I am sooo angry, so here...
Where is that verse I wrote last night
About my missed flight
And how I would crash into the clouds
Making them cry out aloud
Over my poetic plight
Oh, save me, my wayward knight!
#20 Posted by Sinful_Virtue on April 16, 2004 4:42:06 pm
nice thoughts Dee, especially these days when people tend to ignore HIM all the time!!
I recall a movie dialogue, the man said, ``I don`t believe in GOD but i`m afraid of him``
but considering the population of the world and the number of problems in our lives, i can understand the natural delay in response to our prayers !
Best of luck
Sinful
I recall a movie dialogue, the man said, ``I don`t believe in GOD but i`m afraid of him``
but considering the population of the world and the number of problems in our lives, i can understand the natural delay in response to our prayers !
Best of luck
Sinful
#21 Posted by Sinful_Virtue on April 16, 2004 4:42:06 pm
nice thoughts Dee, especially these days when people tend to ignore HIM all the time!!
I recall a movie dialogue, the man said, ``I don`t believe in GOD but i`m afraid of him``
but considering the population of the world and the number of problems in our lives, i can understand the natural delay in response to our prayers !
Best of luck
Sinful
I recall a movie dialogue, the man said, ``I don`t believe in GOD but i`m afraid of him``
but considering the population of the world and the number of problems in our lives, i can understand the natural delay in response to our prayers !
Best of luck
Sinful
listing 16-32
1
2
Interact Index
Similar Articles
- Faith and Religion Murad A Baig
- The 'One God' Religions of Revelation Murad A Baig
- Bullhe Shah and His Veil of “Meem” Mohammad Gill
- Search for the God Particle Mohammad Gill
- Do Intercessory Prayers Work? Mansur Sindhi
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- tahmed32: DM#69 "Before any meaningful... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- nkg: I was reading an... Karachi Riots! Who is
- tahmed32: Goldfinger #687 you are... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- nkg: Re: # 52 rf... that will... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- dost_mittar: Before any meaningful cooperatin... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- nkg: Re: # 66 muthu anna, ... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- nkg: Re: # 60 ekal... a lot... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- masanamuthu: And the whole... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content