Hamid Mahmood August 6, 2004
#99 Posted by plats8 on August 9, 2004 10:09:42 am
Hamid_81,
Another pearl from you...
``You do know beef is very important if you want to keep playing those taans.``
Darn, someone should`ve mentioned this to Allauddin Khan.
Another pearl from you...
``You do know beef is very important if you want to keep playing those taans.``
Darn, someone should`ve mentioned this to Allauddin Khan.
#98 Posted by hamid_81 on August 9, 2004 10:09:42 am
Stuka. You can cuss me out as much as you can. All that tells me is that hindus in India, are as fuc..ked up as you are. And really without any doubt, I think they should be totally removed from the face of this earth. One more reason for Pakistan to Nuke you guys. If I become the president of Pakistan, without even asking a question send you whole family and girls over so I can use them. Else your a.s is nuked, and you will only have charred burned remains of Muslims to whack off on.
Now balluKhan. I think you are an insecure failure. Neither are you a good musician ( I think you are a third rate musician), nor an intelligent one. rais khan, can sing Ghazals, and Thumris, and songs and play sitar because he can. And he does whatever he does good. Now you on the other hand, are a sorry-a.s individual. Nobod knows what you do. Play, sing, whack off? What? >???????? Well, an advice, become a shagird of rais Khan, as he wil gladly accept you and learn. rather than talking about things you don`t know, learn. And then write what you want to say. Onthe other hand, I perfectly well know how to play sitar, and sing. So I don`t need your stupid advice, on how to play. On the other hand I might be able to teach you a couple of things if you want. No just stop with you whining. Rais Khan is beyond your reach, so admit it.
In Pakistan, yes he doesn`t play a lot of concerts, but every year he comes to USA and plays. Millinos of people, even spies of Ravi Shankar and other stupid people, come and listen to him. His techniques and baaj is beayond everybody. So no need to discuss that. Produce one recording of sitar like him and then come out and say what you say.
Now ana, please DO NOT under any circumstances think I apologised to you. I just said that I lowered myself to your filthy level, and I apologised to people for my usage. I still think the same thing for you.
Why don`t you and stuka get together and raise an army/family of patriotic Indian MusHinds? Something you can definetly work on.
Now balluKhan. I think you are an insecure failure. Neither are you a good musician ( I think you are a third rate musician), nor an intelligent one. rais khan, can sing Ghazals, and Thumris, and songs and play sitar because he can. And he does whatever he does good. Now you on the other hand, are a sorry-a.s individual. Nobod knows what you do. Play, sing, whack off? What? >???????? Well, an advice, become a shagird of rais Khan, as he wil gladly accept you and learn. rather than talking about things you don`t know, learn. And then write what you want to say. Onthe other hand, I perfectly well know how to play sitar, and sing. So I don`t need your stupid advice, on how to play. On the other hand I might be able to teach you a couple of things if you want. No just stop with you whining. Rais Khan is beyond your reach, so admit it.
In Pakistan, yes he doesn`t play a lot of concerts, but every year he comes to USA and plays. Millinos of people, even spies of Ravi Shankar and other stupid people, come and listen to him. His techniques and baaj is beayond everybody. So no need to discuss that. Produce one recording of sitar like him and then come out and say what you say.
Now ana, please DO NOT under any circumstances think I apologised to you. I just said that I lowered myself to your filthy level, and I apologised to people for my usage. I still think the same thing for you.
Why don`t you and stuka get together and raise an army/family of patriotic Indian MusHinds? Something you can definetly work on.
#96 Posted by Foad_Shah on August 9, 2004 10:09:41 am
SOME INTERACTORS ARE UNFORTUNATELY MAKING THIS AN INDIA VS.PAKISTAN ISSUE.
THEY ARE DIGRESSING FROM THE MAIN THEME THE STORY PRESENTS. NO ONE IS SAYING THAT PAKISTAN IS CLEANSED FROM RAPE OR VIOLENCE ETC. BUT THEN THEY ARE ONLY ON A SECETERIAN LEVEL, EVEN IF RIOTS TOOK PLACE IN PAKISTAN AGAINST NON-MUSLIMS, THE RATIO , COMPARED TO INDIA IS MUCH LOW. I REALLY DO NOT KNOW WHAT MR.RAJAT WAS TRYING TO PROVE AS THE REPORT HE PRESENTED SHOWS ILLITERACY AND SUPPRESSED SOCIAL CONDITIONS AND NOT RAPE OR VIOLENCE OR MANSLAUGHTER AGAINST NON MUSLIMS.

A mass grave in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, in which sixty-one bodies — thirty-four of women and twenty-seven of children — are buried. Since February 27, 2002, more than 850 people have been killed in communal violence in the state of Gujarat, most of them Muslims. Unofficial estimates put the death toll as high as 2,000. The attacks against Muslims in Gujarat have been actively supported by state government officials and by the police. Police told Muslims, ``We don`t have any orders to save you.`` © 2002 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch
STATE AND POLICE PARTICIPATION AND COMPLICITY
On the morning of February 27, 2002, the gruesome attack on the Sabarmati Express in Godhra, Gujarat, left fifty-eight dead. The train cars set alight were carrying Hindu kar sevaks (religious volunteers) returning from Ayodhya. By evening, retaliatory attacks against Muslims had begun, including in Rajkot, Vadodara, and Bharuch.50 That same day the Vishwa Hindu Parishad called for a statewide bandh (shut-down) for February 28, a call that according to press reports, its cadre interpreted as a call to action.51 The state`s endorsement of the bandh, announced through a press note issued at 8 p.m. on February 27, was taken by the VHP/Bajrang Dal as an endorsement of its stand.
State support of the bandh also sent a message to the police. A reporter for the Hindu observed that, ``In such a situation, the police would always be hesitant to act lest it hurt the interests of the political bosses. And the saffronised police also found a common cause with the criminals to `punish` the minorities.`` The same reporter wrote that, ``insiders in the Bharatiya Janata Party admit that the police were under instructions from the Narendra Modi administration not to act firmly.``
By the afternoon of February 27, retaliatory attacks had already begun, including the stabbing of a Muslim man in Vadodara railway station as crowds gathered awaiting the arrival of the Sabarmati Express.55 Starting on the morning of February 28, Hindu mobs unleashed a coordinated attack against Muslims in many of Gujarat`s towns and cities.56 Despite the state`s claims that police were simply overwhelmed by the sheer size of the Hindu mobs-often numbering in the thousands-evidence collected by the media, Indian human rights groups, and Human Rights Watch all point to state sponsorship of the attacks. Eyewitness accounts cited throughout this report, as well as the history of police and political recruitment demonstrate the state`s partisan role. In a matter of days, over 850 people are known to have been killed-although unofficial estimates are as high as 2,000. Violence continued as of this writing and has quickly spread to poorly protected rural areas. Accounts of politicians directing the violence are also commonplace. Furthermore, in many cases, police posts and police stations were in close proximity to affected sites.
After allowing thirty-six hours to pass without any serious intervention, the first of several contingents of army troops were deployed into Ahmedabad, Rajkot, and Vadodara on March 1.58 Many had to be flown in from reserves` stations in south Indian as the bulk of Indian forces are stationed along the India-Pakistan border. Though the army arrived in Gujarat soon after the Godhra carnage,60 the state government refused to deploy the soldiers until twenty-fours hours after they arrived and only once the worst violence had ended.61 The army`s inability to rapidly intervene was also hindered by the state government`s failure to provide requested transportation support and information regarding areas where violence was occurring. Speaking on why the army took so long to quell the violence, an Indian army source stated, ``We are ordered to be deployed only when such incidents happen. And once we are there it is up to that state administration how they use us.``
In Ahmedabad, Gujarat`s commercial capital and the site of Human Rights Watch`s investigations, many attacks took place within view of police posts and police stations. Human Rights Watch viewed several police posts less than fifty feet from the site of burnt Muslim-owned restaurants, places of businesses, and hotels in Ahmedabad. Without exception, the Hindu-owned establishments neighboring the destroyed structures were unscathed. The same pattern was observed by India`s National Human Rights Commission during its fact-finding mission in March (see below).
Attacks in Ahmedabad on February 28 also began at precisely the same time, around 10:30 in the morning. Muslims living in ``mixed communities,`` that is alongside Hindus, were hit the hardest while those concentrated in Muslim enclaves following a history of state communal riots fared only marginally better.
According to an article in The Week, a weekly Indian news magazine, 1,679 houses, 1,965 shops, and twenty-one godowns (warehouses) were burnt, 204 shops looted, and seventy-six shrines were destroyed in Ahmedabad. The great majority of them belonged to Muslims.
Dozens of witnesses interviewed by Human Rights Watch described almost identical operations. The attackers arrived by the thousands in trucks, clad in saffron scarves and khaki shorts, the signature uniform of Hindu nationalist, or Hindutva, groups. Shouting slogans of incitement to kill, they were armed with swords, trishuls, 65 sophisticated explosives, and gas cylinders. Guided by computer printouts listing the addresses of Muslim families and their properties, information obtained from the Ahmedabad municipal corporation among other sources, they embarked on a murderous rampage. In many cases, the police led the charge, aiming and firing at Muslims who got in the mobs` way
According to the preliminary report of SAHMAT, a Delhi-based nongovernmental organization, its fact-finding team found graffiti left behind on the charred walls of a burnt madrassa in Sundaramnagar, Ahmedabad boasted of police support:
Yeh andar ki bat hai
Police hamarey saath hai
(This is inside information, the police are with us).
Jaan se mar dengey
Bajrang Dal zindabad
Narendra Modi zindabad
(We will kill. Long live the Bajrang Dal. Long live Narendra Modi).
Andar ki bat hai... was also the war-cry used to terrorize Muslim residents in Vadi in the city of Vadodara as they burnt Muslim-owned shops that ironically sold kites, bindis, and bangles for Hindu festivals.
Human Rights Watch interviews with eyewitnesses to the attacks revealed that that the attackers were carrying voter lists as well as listings of Muslim businesses, along with cell phones and water bottles ``so as to be fully prepared for a long day`s work.`` According to a report in Outlook magazine, attempts to pinpoint the exact location of Muslim businesses began months before the attacks:
In Ahmedabad... one official recalled how for the last few months, there had been concerted attempts to get lists of Muslim business establishments from the Ahmedabad municipal corporation.... VHP volunteers have also been making the rounds of professional institutions and universities, seeking the names and addresses of Muslim students. Some government sources say VHP members have drawn up lists of government departments (for example, the Food Corporation of India) and their allied agencies, and identified ``undesirables`` and their addresses.
Professor Keshavram Kashiram Shastri, ninety-six-year-old chairman of the Gujarat unit of the VHP denied the charge that the VHP prepared lists in advance of Muslim shops to loot. To the contrary, he said ``the list of shops owned by Muslims in Ahmedabad was prepared on the morning of February 28 itself.``
Voter lists were also reportedly used to identify and target Muslim community members. A senior police officer told rediff.com, a leading Internet news site on India, on conditions of anonymity that, ``[The attackers] hardly failed to lay hands on their targets, thanks to documents like the voters` list.... The mission was accomplished with clinical precision.``
In many cases the leaders of the attack, who communicated with one another on cell phones, receiving instructions in seemingly well-coordinated and planned operations, have been identified by name in police reports as members of the BJP and the VHP. Few, if any, of the leaders have been arrested .
As the state offers one excuse after another-that the police were outnumbered, overwhelmed, did not receive orders to respond, or that their own feelings could not be ``insulated from the general social milieu`` -no excuse proves sufficient to explain the direct participation of police in the attacks.
Press reports and eyewitness testimonies, including those collected by Human Rights Watch, abound with stories of police participation and complicity in the attacks. Their crimes range from inaction to direct participation in the looting and burning of Muslim shops, restaurants, hotels, homes, and the killing of Muslim residents. Worse still, officers who tried to keep the peace or act against murderous mobs have been transferred or have faced the wrath of their superiors.
A key state minister is reported to have taken over a police control room in Ahmedabad on the first day of the carnage, issuing directions not to rescue Muslims in danger of being killed:
If VHP-BJP leaders led mobs from the front along with the police, they also took control of the institutional apparatus. Health Minister Ashok Bhatt sat in the Police Control Room in Ahmedabad through the first two days of violence. Given his portfolio, it was an odd place to be but not given his past. Bhatt, along with Union Minister of State for Defence Harin Pathak, faces charges of having incited a mob that murdered a police constable in the course of communal violence on April 25, 1985. According to several eyewitnesses, another State Minister, Harin Pandya, moved through the Paldi area, speaking to leaders of mobs that were burning Muslim homes and shops. [State Home Minister Gordhan] Jhadaphia, who ought to have been in the control room after the violence broke out on February , was busy telling reporters that he ``did not expect Hindus to retaliate.``
Many people testified that the police led the mobs directly to their homes and places of business. In many instances, the police also fired upon Muslim youth, crushing any organized self-defense against the mobs.
A human rights activist who has been visiting relief camps in Ahmedabad on an almost daily basis since the attacks and documenting in detail the nature and methodology of the violence provided valuable insight into the patterns that emerged:
Most incidents happened at the same time. It was definitely pre-planned. Many were around 10:30 a.m. The role of the police was also very clear. When I interviewed victims, they said that prior to the attacks mass meetings were taking place that were being addressed by local VHP and Bajrang Dal leaders. A rumor was already going around that something was going to happen, long before the Godhra incident.
The attacks also took place where the Muslim population is low, in areas where people could not adequately defend or protect themselves. The police itself was also involved in almost all incidents. Local MLAs [members of legislative assembly] and corporators [local officials] were also involved. In many cases SRP [State Reserve Police] camps were close by. Everybody knew that attacks were going on but no one tried to prevent them. So many women had been gang-raped and then killed.... Usually in our work we address individual incidents so we have hope for justice. But there is no hope here because the involvement of the police is so high. You feel irrelevant, like you have wasted ten years.
Twenty-six major towns and talukas (sub-districts) in Gujarat were affected in the first week of violence. Attacks had also spread to rural areas. In Halad village in north Gujarat, for example, hotels and businesses belonging to Muslims were attacked when the dead body of a Hindu activist killed in the train attack in Godhra was brought to the village.78 The patterns of violence in the worst-hit cities, where the majority of people killed were Muslim, were remarkably similar, lending further support to the notion that the attacks were planned and not the result of spontaneous riots. An interim report on violence in Vadodara submitted to the NHRC by the nongovernmental People`s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), for example, documents in meticulous detail the selective burning and looting of Muslim homes and places of business, the destruction of mosques, the killing, beating, and maiming of Muslims, the extent of police participation in the attacks, and the role of the local media in inciting the violence. The report also documents the spreading of hate propaganda leading to economic boycotts. A separate report by PUCL outlines the impact on women (see below).
At this writing, attacks were being reported on an almost daily basis, over six weeks after the state government`s claims that the situation had been brought under control. On March 24, for example, thirty-year-old Mumtazbano was stripped in public and stabbed to death by a mob in the Vejalpur area of Ahmedabad after being dragged off her husband`s scooter.80 On April 6, at least five people were killed in Ahmedabad. Two were stabbed to death and three were killed by police gunfire as police reportedly fired to disperse clashing groups of Hindus and Muslims.81 On April 17, three people were stabbed to death and fifteen were injured in Hindu-Muslim clashes in Ahmedabad.
POLICE FIRINGS
``They only shot at one side. Why? Why didn`t they shoot to stop the attackers?``
Numerous eyewitnesses to the attacks in Ahmedabad told Human Rights Watch that police gunfire paved the way for the violent mobs. Marching in front of the mobs, the police burst tear gas shells and aimed and fired at Muslim youth seeking to defend their families and their homes. According to a report in The Week, a weekly Indian news magazine, in the month following the Godhra massacre, 120 people had been killed in police shootings throughout the state, many of them Muslim.84 At this writing, the numbers were climbing. Hindus were also killed in police shootings, some in response to shoot-on-sight orders issued by Chief Minister Modi on March 1 to stop those participating in rioting and arson, and others in the weeks that followed as police tried to contain outbreaks of violence.
During the first two days of violence, Chief Minister Modi defended the actions of his police stating that they had ``mowed down people`` to quell the violence. According to the Indian Express, ``one such incident he was referring to occurred on February 28 and March 1 near the Bapunagar police station, where 40 were killed in firing. Now, according to a batch of FIRs filed last week and post mortem reports, it has come to light that all 40 were Muslims, most of them shot in the head and the chest. And 36 of them were between 20 and 25 years old.``
A resident of the Chartoda Kabristan camp in the Gomtipur area told Human Rights Watch: ``We were able to handle the crowd but when the police joined in then we couldn`t stop them. Our spirit was broken. They were shouting, `Kill them, cut them, look for Miyabhai [Muslim man].` The police burned the houses with their own hands. They also looted. Now everyone is afraid of the police; they were only firing on Muslims. They were not firing for riot control.``
According to the Chartoda Kabristan camp organizer:
From the areas represented in this camp, twenty-five people were hit in police and private firings. Sixteen died, the rest are in hospitals.... There are still burnings going on.... If they keep dividing people then people will keep losing faith in this state. They need to put a brake on it. If the state does not want to stop it then it will keep happening. Everyone will tell you that the police came first, fired and then the private attackers came.88
Twenty-five-year-old Abdul Aziz, a resident of Panna Lal ki Chali, near Chartoda Kabristan, witnessed the killing of his brother by police gunfire. He told Human Rights Watch:
On the 28th afternoon at 3 p.m. my younger brother was returning from work. The police said that a curfew was in place. A crowd gathered to attack. The police was leading the crowd. They were looting and the people followed, looting and burning behind them. The crowd was shouting, ``Go to Pakistan. If you want to stay here become Hindu.`` The police very clearly aimed at my brother and fired at him. He was twenty-three years old. At 6 p.m., three hours later, we were able to get him to the hospital.... We have not filed any complaints. All the doctors that have been coming here are private or from NGOs.
Julamasul Abdul Bhai Kureishi, of Danzi ki Chali near Chartoda Kabristan, lost his son to police gunfire. He told Human Rights Watch:
They made us homeless and they took my son.... The police came from one side and the crowd came from the other. They started setting fire to things and firing shots. My son was shot and killed. He was twenty-two years old. They collected all the young men. The police were calling the crowds. The police had the mob behind them.
Another resident of Danzi ki Chali told Human Rights Watch: ``The police grabbed me and hit me with a sword and a lathi [baton]. They also shot my seven-year-old son. He spent eleven to twelve days in the hospital.``
Twenty-two-year-old Mohammed Salim from Bara Sache ki Chali told Human Rights Watch that most of the deaths in his neighborhood were caused by police shooting. He described a pattern testified to by many interviewed by Human Rights Watch:
The Hindus called us outside to fight. When we came out, the police fired on us, twelve to thirteen people died.... They said come forward, then they started shouting, ``Kill the Muslims, cut the Muslims, loot the Muslims.`` The police were with them and picked out the Muslim homes and set them on fire. The police aimed and fired at the Muslim boys. They then joined with the Hindus to set fire to the homes and to loot the homes. The police were carrying kerosene bottles and shooting and setting the bottles on fire. The others were carrying swords and trishuls. Some of the attackers were wearing kesri pattis [saffron bandannas] on their foreheads with the words ``Jai Sri Ram`` [Praise Lord Ram]. The attackers consisted of both people from our neighborhood and also people from outside. None of the deaths from our area were from the Bajrang Dal, it was all from police firing. One person also lost his eyesight as a result of police firing. One woman was burnt alive. She was old and couldn`t run. She was cut in three pieces. The police came inside [the Chartoda Kabristan area] and fired.
A fifteen-year-old boy named Sanu from the Riyaz Hussain ki Chali was also killed. According to residents of the Chartoda Kabristan camp, ``The police caught him from inside the Masjid, took him to the Hindu area and shot him at close range.``
MASS GRAVESITES AND COLLECTION OF BODIES
Surviving family members have faced the added trauma of having to fend for themselves in recovering and identifying the bodies of their loved ones under difficult security conditions and with little assistance from the state government. The bodies have been buried in mass gravesites throughout Ahmedabad. Many bodies have been charred beyond recognition and many are still missing. To bury hundreds of Muslim victims, mass gravesites have sprouted throughout the city of Ahmedabad. A March 6 article on the news site rediff.com reported that as many as 212 bodies of men, women, and children were buried in graveyards in Dudheshwar, Juhapura, Sarkhej, and Sarangpur-all in Ahmedabad-since March 3, 2002.
Human Rights Watch visited a gravesite in the Shahibaug area of Ahmedabad. According to gravediggers there: ``The state government has not given one paisa [one cent]. No one asks. One police car would accompany a truck full of bodies. Our young would go around and look for the bodies. We use our own trucks.``93 When asked about the events of the last several weeks, eighty-five-year-old gravekeeper Abdul Kadir simply said: ``I cannot even talk about it.`` Another gravekeeper added, ``New incidents are happening so more bodies keep coming.``94 Gravekeepers claimed to have already buried close to three hundred bodies at the gravesite. Human Rights Watch was shown a metal leg brace that survived the burning of its owner to illustrate the story of a handicapped person`s murder. A resident of the Chartoda Kabristan camp in Gomtipur told Human Rights Watch: ``We ourselves collected and buried the bodies. The military came with us for protection.``
ATTACKS ON WOMEN
I have never known a riot which has used the sexual subjugation of women so widely as an instrument of violence as in the recent mass barbarity in Gujarat. There are reports everywhere of gang-rape, of young girls and women, often in the presence of members of their families, followed by their murder by burning alive, or by bludgeoning with a hammer and in one case with a screw driver. Women in the Aman Chowk shelter told appalling stories about how armed men disrobed themselves in front of a group of terrified women to cower them down further.
Tragically consistent with the longstanding pattern of attacks on minorities and Dalits (or so-called untouchables) in India, and with previous episodes of large-scale communal violence in India, scores of Muslim girls and women were brutally raped in Gujarat before being killed.
A resident of Jawan Nagar, Naroda, Ahmedabad told the Citizens` Initiative that only four out of his eleven family members had survived. His daughter was raped and burned, succumbing to her injuries in the hospital:
My house has a small grocery store and I was there in the store. A mob came from Charanagar. Five hundred strong mob came from Kubernagar. Two thousand strong mob came. They started riot, burning houses. We ran to nearby Gangotri society and took shelter on the terrace. The mob started burning people at around 5 or 6 o`clock in the evening. The mob stripped all the girls of the locality including my 22-year-old daughter and raped them. My daughter was engaged. Seven members of my family were burnt that includes my wife (age 40), my son (18), my son (14), my son (7), my daughter (4), my daughter (2). Police did not allow me to climb down from the terrace. My 8-year-old son has survived with 20 percent burn injuries and he remembers his mother. What can I do? My house and shop has been burnt.... They hit her on the head and burnt. She had 80 percent burn injuries.
Even pregnant women were not spared. In some cases, their bellies were cut open and the fetus was pulled out before the women were killed. A gravedigger at a mass grave site next to the Dariyakhan Ghummat camp in the Shahibaug area told Human Rights Watch: ``There were at least three pregnant women and one of the fetuses was partially hanging out. We had to stick it back in before burial. If the fetus was completely removed then we left it out but still buried it with the mother.``
A woman who washed the bodies of female victims before burial at the same site told Human Rights Watch about the conditions of the bodies upon arrival:
I washed the ladies` bodies before burial. Some bodies had heads missing, some had hands missing, some were like coal, you would touch them and they would crumble. Some women`s bodies had been split down the middle. I washed seventeen bodies on March 2, only one was completely intact. All had been burned, many had been split down the middle. On March 3 fifteen more bodies came. Then I just threw water over them, I couldn`t stand to be around them anymore.
Some of the cuts down the middle of the bodies may have been a consequence of official autopsies, though not all.
A report sponsored by the Citizens` Initiative dated April 16, 2002 and titled ``The Survivors Speak`` presents over thirty pages of testimony from female victims and eyewitnesses to the violence in Gujarat. The report is based on investigations conducted at the end of March by a fact-finding team of prominent women`s rights activists. Among the report`s most significant findings is the fact that crimes against women, in both urban and rural areas, have been grossly underreported and under-recorded by the police. The report states:
Among the women surviving in relief camps, are many who have suffered the most bestial forms of sexual violence - including rape, gang rape, mass rape, stripping, insertion of objects into their body, stripping, molestations. A majority of rape victims have been burnt alive.
There is evidence of State and Police complicity in perpetuating crimes against women. No effort was made to protect women. No Mahila [women] Police [were] deployed. State and Police complicity in these crimes is continuing, as women survivors continue to be denied the right to file FIRs. There is no existing institutional mechanism in Gujarat through which women can seek justice.
Among the testimonies documented in the report is that of Saira from Panchmahals district, Gujarat. Her name has been changed by Human Rights Watch:
On the afternoon of February 28th to escape the violent mob, about 40 of us got on to a tempo [a vehicle]. My husband was driving the tempo... a Maruti car was blocking the road. A mob was lying in wait. [My husband] had to swerve. The tempo overturned. As we got out they started attacking us. People started running in all directions. Some of us ran towards the river. I fell behind as I was carrying my son. The men caught me from behind and threw me on the ground. [My son] fell from my arms and started crying. My clothes were stripped off by the men and I was left stark naked. One by one the men raped me. All the while I could hear my son crying. I lost count after 3. They then cut my foot with a sharp weapon and left me there in that state.
The report also cites the extent of Bajrang Dal and VHP participation in the attacks, adding that members of these organizations were distributing arms in rural areas as early as six months before the violence began.
An interim report by the People`s Union for Civil Liberties on ``women`s experiences and perspectives`` on the communal violence in Vadodara, based on data collected between February 27 and March 26, 2002, states:
The wide range of data collected reveals that the post-Godhra carnage has affected most women living in Vadodara in some way or the other. Lives of minority women have of course changed drastically. However, women from all communities are also affected by the reign of fear and the terror promoted by the state and the police. The Hindu women are caught in a fear psychosis that the ``other`` will attack. A lot of this has to do with the rumours that are being systematically spread through various pamphlets and booklets. Livelihoods of all poor, working class women have been affected. The situation in the minority households is far more serious, and hunger has become an acute problem because the minority men too cannot go out to work. The deep sense of betrayal that women feel by neighbours and children ``who grew up in front of my eyes [or in my aangan]`` is seen across classes.105
On April 24 India`s National Commission for Women (NCW) added its voice to those of the National Commission for Minorities and the National Human Rights Commission (see below) and accused the Gujarat government of ``failing to perform its constitutional duty.`` NCW expressed concern over the state of fear and insecurity in the state, particularly among women, adding that much more needed to be done for the relief and rehabilitation of women, particularly those that had lost family members or were victims of sexual violence.1
THE EFFECT ON CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE
The children of Gujarat have been severely affected and traumatized by the violence. In addition to the rape and murder of many children (see above), many bore witness to the death of their family members.107 Unclaimed and unidentified children`s bodies still crowd Ahmedabad`s morgues. Many children have also been orphaned or have suffered serious stabbing and burn injuries. In the aftermath of the violence, their education has been severely disrupted and little counseling is available to them to cope with the trauma of what they experienced. A Citizens` Initiative fact-finding team on violence against women in Gujarat (see above) spoke to young girls from Naroda Patia still trying to make sense of the rapes that they had witnessed. One girl interviewed said:
``Mein bataoon Didi`` (Shall I tell you?), volunteers a nine-year-old, ``Balatkaar ka matlab jab aurat ko nanga karte hain aur phir use jala deta hain.`` (Rape is when a woman is stripped naked and then burnt) And then looks fixedly at the floor. Only a child can tell it like it is. For this is what happened again and again in Naroda Patia - women were stripped, raped and burnt. Burning has now become an essential part of the meaning of rape.
Nineteen-year-old Sheikh S. from Mehndi Kuva, Shahpur, slum quarters in Ahmedabad, explained the long-term consequences of the attacks on children`s education and on the livelihood of affected families:
All the children`s education has been disrupted. All businesses are closed. All savings are gone. My parents are so old they cannot go back to work. I will surely have to leave my studies now and go to work. I was studying in the 11th standard. Still we won`t get the government jobs, those are given to Hindus. We will have to do labor.
Sheikh added that in the looting and burning of his home, his education certificates and other valuables were also destroyed: ``All my education certificates and medical reports that were in a suitcase were also destroyed. I have a blood disease and need those reports.``
In addition to destruction of educational records, students have been attacked while going to school. An eighteen-year-old student in Bharuch was pulled off a rickshaw and hit on the head and killed while returning home after taking a board exam.112 In Modasa, the college-aged son of a police inspector was stabbed and killed.113 The violence has also led to school exams being postponed in Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Bharuch, and Modasa.114 In addition, at Gujarat University, exams have not yet been completed because mobs have been successful in disrupting exams. The school plans on completing exams by having police vans stationed in sensitive areas.115 There are also disturbing reports that the same groups which collected information on Muslim shops and residences in preparation for attacks, are now openly collecting information on the number of Muslim children in each school in order to intimidate Muslim children from attending.116 Principals of English-medium schools in Gujarat have also been threatened with violence by VHP members if they did not expel Muslim students from their institutions. According to one report, parents are being told by school officials to remove their children from these schools on the grounds that their safety could not be guaranteed. The tactics are helping to ensure that Muslim children are confined to madrasas, or Muslim-run religious schools, where education is imparted in Hindi or Urdu-limiting severely the students` career prospects.
DESTRUCTION OF MOSQUES AND DURGAS:
Attackers also destroyed Dargahs, traditional meeting grounds for Hindus and Muslims and razed mosques. In some cases makeshift Hindu temples were erected in their place. In many places saffron flags, the signature flag of Hindu nationalist groups, were dug deep into mosque domes.118 Roughly twenty mosques were destroyed in Ahmedabad alone, many on March 1 during Friday prayers.119 Even historical monuments were not spared. According to the preliminary report of an Indian human rights fact-finding team:
The famous 500-year-old masjid in Isanpur, which was an ASI [Archeological Survey of India] monument, was destroyed with the help of cranes and bulldozers. The famous Urdu Poet Wali Gujarati`s dargah was also razed to the ground at Shahibaug in Ahmedabad. While a hanuman [a Hindu god] shrine was built over its debris initially, all that was removed overnight and the plot was [paved] and merged with the adjoining road. No authority claimed any knowledge about the entire episode. It is worth noting here that the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, which is responsible for the maintenance of all these structures, and for the building of roads, is run by the Congress [party] with a near two-thirds majority.

Noorani Masjid, a destroyed mosque in the Naroda Patia neighborhood of Ahmedabad. On February 28 at least sixty-five people were killed in Naroda Patia by a 5,000-strong mob aided by the police. The attackers killed, mutilated, and burned Muslim residents of the neighborhood, gang-raped women and girls, and torched and looted their homes. The Noorani Masjid was destroyed using exploding gas cylinders. © 2002 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch
More problems and possibly violence may ensue in deciding how and whether to reconstruct the shattered mosques on these the new religious sites.
LOOTING:
The brutal killing and sexual violence was also accompanied by widespread looting and burning of homes. For many the violence became an excuse for daylight robbery in which even affluent Gujaratis took part. Most relief camp inhabitants are now homeless and completely dispossessed of all their belongings. Numerous victims testified to the extent of the theft and looting of their property both during the attacks and in the days that followed after they had fled for safety to makeshift camps.
A fifty-year-old woman named Fatu Bhen from Sanjay Nagar Nanachiloda, an area just outside of Ahmedabad, told Human Rights Watch, ``When they attacked we ran into the fields. For one day and one night we hid in the fields. Then we walked to Gandhinagar. My brother brought me here. We didn`t even have a chance to lock our doors. My brother went back to see and found that everything had been burned and looted.``
http://www.hrw.org/photos/2002/india/images/3.jpg``>
A makeshift Hindu temple flying a saffron flag in Gomptipur, Ahmedabad. One of many erected in Muslim neighborhoods and on the site of destroyed mosques. The words painted on the wall say, in Hindi, “Lord Ram.” © 2002 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch
Jinat A., a forty-year-old woman from Naroda Patia, told Human Rights Watch:
The riots came, we ran. We saw people getting cut up and burned. They used swords and sharp weapons. The first two days we were somewhere else and then we came to the camp. They stole all our things and burned our homes. They took our TVs, tapes, everything, even the beds. They took everything.... We have been here since March 1. We arrived at 3 a.m. Where will we go? The curfews are set. The police killed as well.
Thirty-year-old Noorjehan belonged to a relatively affluent Muslim family and lived in the government quarter of Mehndi Kuva. Out of a total of thirty-six homes, only three belonged to Muslims. The rest belonged to Hindus. Noorjehan suffered severe head injuries but survived the attack after being left for dead. Visibly in pain and with fresh bandages around her head, she told Human Rights Watch:
On February 28 we were all sitting at home and heard a noise, this was around noon. Our Hindu neighbor said, ``Don`t go out.`` If he said go then we could have run and saved ourselves. He was drunk. Everyone started to surround the house. They all had swords and pipes. I locked the doors. They then broke down the main door. They threw an iron pipe through the iron bars, which hit me across my eyes. I got dizzy. They then started to set fire to things. I tried to close all the doors as fast as I could, but they came in and hit me with pipes all over on my head, my legs. They were about to take out a sword and cut me with it. But one Hindu had pity on me I guess and said, ``Don`t cut her, set her on fire.`` When I heard that I fainted. When I fainted they took off all of my jewels. They were screaming, ``Ram bol.`` [Say Ram]. I think they then put me on top of the fire. My twelve-year-old niece dragged me off and threw water on me to save me. I was covered in blood. I had sent my brothers away; they went to hide in another Hindu`s house. They thought I was dead so they moved on to the next Muslim house. My mother took me inside the house. A Dalit scavenger brought the doctor to me. They gave me an injection because I was going to hemorrhage. Finally the family doctor came. I was vomiting for two days. The police were nowhere. They did not help anyone. When we called they said, ``You protect yourselves.`` The police are only two minutes away from our home.
After Noorjehan and her family left for the camp they learned that their home had been looted:
We contacted this camp by mobile phone and people here sent a car for us and brought us here. After we came our house was looted. They didn`t even leave our animals. My mother was so fond of raising those animals. They took them, cut them, and ate them: our sheep, our chickens. There was a temple in front of our house. They ate the animals there the next day. They took our gold, our silver. We had four safes in the house. All of them were looted. They took our cutlery as well.
Noorjehan believed her neighbors were involved in the attacks and had long been participating in meetings to plot attacks against Muslims:
In previous riots, we used to close the main gates to the residential quarters, but not this time. The people inside were mixed up with this so they left the big gates open. They were always meeting about how to go after Muslims but we never believed it would happen to us, we have been there for so many years. I can`t sleep properly. They are enemies of humanity. They are complete monsters and devils.
Noorjehan and her family arrived at the camp on the evening of March 1: ``We left even without our shoes on. No one has come to ask us anything about who attacked us or how much was taken. On March 2 or 3 we filed a complaint. My mother went back on March 16 to see what had become of our home.``127 Her mother added: ``I went to see if any of my animals were left. There was nothing left. The people were still roaming the area with swords.``
Unlike residents of Naroda Patia, Noorjehan very much wanted to return to her home but lamented that it was too unsafe. ``If we got security then at least we could go back home,`` she said.
Rehman Pata, Noorjehan`s twenty-year-old brother described the reaction of the police when he approached them for help during the attack on his home:
I ran to the police station, I fought the crowds to get through. Two constables told me, ``You go and we`ll follow you.`` But they never came. I came home and saw that my sister had been hit by a pipe.... These were Shiv Sena and VHP workers. We know the names of some of the people who did this. After the attack one of them made a call and told the person he was talking to move on to the next Muslim home. They were coordinating everything on their cell phones. We filed a complaint against them. They didn`t leave anything, even my childhood toys.... One of our Hindu neighbors told the mob not to burn our home otherwise theirs would catch on fire as well. He said, ``Don`t burn it just loot it.``
Nineteen-year-old Sheikh S., also from Mehndi Kuva, lived in a slum quarter adjacent to the government quarter. He told Human Rights Watch that his neighbors were involved in the attacks and that police gave them their blessing to loot Muslim shops and homes:
It all started at 10 a.m. on February 28. They came after the Muslim shops. Around 8 p.m., they attacked my quarters. They were screaming, ``Jai Shri Ram.`` They opened the locks with their iron pipes. They burned all the beddings but took all the nice things. They did not set fire to our house because it was a flat system and Hindu homes would also have been affected. We were calling the police all day. The police said, ``You help yourselves, we are getting pressure from above, we cannot help you.`` We called fifty to a hundred times. Around 2:00 or 2:30 p.m. I saw a police inspector shake hands with the attackers and say, ``You can loot peacefully, we won`t do anything. We are with you.``
Sheikh listed the names of those involved in the attacks, many of whom he recognized. He then added:
We filed a complaint and wrote down all the names. During the attack, thirty to thirty-five went to hide in a Goanese Christian home after 6 p.m. Then the crowd surrounded that home and said, ``You send them out or we will kill you too.`` After that we came here to the camp with police escorts. We called the camp on our mobile phone and they sent the police to us to bring us here. We arrived March 1 at 1 a.m. We then called the Christian family from here and they told us the crowds started looting the homes on March 1. Our dowry, marriage money, machines, etc. all of them were looted. They even took the two lights and the wiring and the fan. They took everything. They took my brother`s new cycle but set my old one on fire.132
Sheikh also sustained head injuries during the attacks and still wore a dressing on the wounds at the time of the interview three weeks later: ``At one point they surrounded me and started shouting, `Miya, Miya` [Muslim, Muslim]. They started throwing stones and I ran upstairs.133
THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA:
While the national Indian press has played an important role in exposing the violence and official neglect or misconduct, sectors of the local press have been accused of inciting the violence.
On April 5, 2002, the People`s Union for Civil Liberties and Shanti Abhiyan, both nongovernmental organizations, issued a comprehensive analysis of the role of the media during the violence in Gujarat. Among the papers analyzed is the Vadodara edition of Sandesh, a Gujarati newspaper. The report concludes that the major effort of Sandesh for the period under review ``has been to feed on the prevalent anti-Muslim prejudices of its Hindu readership and provoke it further by sensationalizing, twisting, mangling and distorting news or what passes for it.``134
Sandesh published especially inflammatory headlines, pictures, and stories the day after the Godhra attack. For example, a front page report on February 28, 2002, read: ``AVENGE BLOOD WITH BLOOD.`` Another headline during the first week of March, when Gujarati Muslims were returning from their pilgrimage (Haj) to Mecca, stated: ``HINDUS BEWARE: HAJ PILIGRIMS RETURN WITH A DEADLY CONSPIRACY.`` In fact, most Muslims returning from Haj were so terrified of being attacked that they sought and received escorts home by army officials.
ATTACKS AGINST THE MEDIA
According to the Paris-based Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), some twenty journalists and media workers were attacked by the police on April 7, 2002, in Gandhi Ashram, Ahmedabad while two peace demonstrations were disrupted by members of the Gujarat Yuva Morcha, a youth section of the BJP. A cameraman for the private television station NDTV was told by a deputy police superintendent to stop filming. When he asked why, he was struck on the head and later was admitted to the hospital`s intensive care unit. Witnesses say police then attacked the journalists, seriously injuring several others.RSF adds that a journalist for the Asian Age was beaten up by the Gujarat police while interviewing Muslim women who had complained of police atrocities.
The Government of Gujarat`s Response
The Gujarat government, and in particular its chief minister, has responded to severe criticism regarding its posture during the violence by either tacitly justifying the attacks or asserting that they were quickly brought under control. On March 1, Chief Minister Modi confidently declared that he would control the ``riots resulting from the natural and justified anger of the people.``142 ``Every action has an equal and opposite reaction,`` Modi told reporters. ``The five crore (50 million) people of Gujarat have shown remarkable restraint under grave provocation,`` referring to the Godhra massacre.143
The Gujarat government`s official report of the events, presented to the National Human Rights Commission, includes the following accounts, as reported in the Hindu:
The gory details of the Godhra incident, depicting charred bodies through the electronic media, aroused passions of the people of Gujarat on a very large scale. In the wake of the call for ``Gujarat bandh`` and the possible fall-out of the Godhra incident, the State Government took all possible precautions. However, on account of widespread reporting in the media, incidents of violence on a large-scale started occurring in Ahmedabad, Baroda... Crowds that assembled in the towns were huge and consisted of higher and middle class people. It became difficult even to implement the curfew. Due to timely measures taken by the State Government, major incidents were contained within 72 hours and normality and confidence of the public were restored.144
Tellingly, the report does not once mention the role of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad or the Bajrang Dal, whose members have been named as leaders of the violence in police reports (FIRs), and grossly undercounts the number of mosques and dargahs destroyed and makeshift Hindu temples erected in their place.145
The appointment of retired high court judge K. G. Shah to head a Gujarat state commission of inquiry into possible police inaction or direct complicity and administrative failure during Godhra and its aftermath has also raised concern. Shah`s close association with the BJP government, including his participation on a panel of lawyers representing the state government before the Supreme Court, has left many questioning his ability to conduct an impartial investigation. Dr. Shakeel Ahmed of the Cell for Legal Help and Guidance for the Islamic Relief Committee told the Times of India: ``It`s better if someone from outside is appointed. The state government is involved and is a party to what happened.``146 Even if the Shah commission`s investigations are impartial, his perceived partiality will likely influence victims` willingness to come forward. The history of government-appointed commissions of inquiry in the state, and the country, also raise doubts as to whether the commission`s recommendations will be followed.147 The recommendations of two commissions of inquiry established following the 1969 and 1985 riots have yet to be implemented.

A room in the Dariyakhan Ghummat relief camp in Ahmedabad housing over fifty women and children. The camp held 5,100 people and is one of approximately one hundred relief camps in Gujarat, where 98,000 people, a great majority of them Muslim, have been displaced by the violence. © 2002 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch
THEY ARE DIGRESSING FROM THE MAIN THEME THE STORY PRESENTS. NO ONE IS SAYING THAT PAKISTAN IS CLEANSED FROM RAPE OR VIOLENCE ETC. BUT THEN THEY ARE ONLY ON A SECETERIAN LEVEL, EVEN IF RIOTS TOOK PLACE IN PAKISTAN AGAINST NON-MUSLIMS, THE RATIO , COMPARED TO INDIA IS MUCH LOW. I REALLY DO NOT KNOW WHAT MR.RAJAT WAS TRYING TO PROVE AS THE REPORT HE PRESENTED SHOWS ILLITERACY AND SUPPRESSED SOCIAL CONDITIONS AND NOT RAPE OR VIOLENCE OR MANSLAUGHTER AGAINST NON MUSLIMS.

A mass grave in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, in which sixty-one bodies — thirty-four of women and twenty-seven of children — are buried. Since February 27, 2002, more than 850 people have been killed in communal violence in the state of Gujarat, most of them Muslims. Unofficial estimates put the death toll as high as 2,000. The attacks against Muslims in Gujarat have been actively supported by state government officials and by the police. Police told Muslims, ``We don`t have any orders to save you.`` © 2002 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch
STATE AND POLICE PARTICIPATION AND COMPLICITY
On the morning of February 27, 2002, the gruesome attack on the Sabarmati Express in Godhra, Gujarat, left fifty-eight dead. The train cars set alight were carrying Hindu kar sevaks (religious volunteers) returning from Ayodhya. By evening, retaliatory attacks against Muslims had begun, including in Rajkot, Vadodara, and Bharuch.50 That same day the Vishwa Hindu Parishad called for a statewide bandh (shut-down) for February 28, a call that according to press reports, its cadre interpreted as a call to action.51 The state`s endorsement of the bandh, announced through a press note issued at 8 p.m. on February 27, was taken by the VHP/Bajrang Dal as an endorsement of its stand.
State support of the bandh also sent a message to the police. A reporter for the Hindu observed that, ``In such a situation, the police would always be hesitant to act lest it hurt the interests of the political bosses. And the saffronised police also found a common cause with the criminals to `punish` the minorities.`` The same reporter wrote that, ``insiders in the Bharatiya Janata Party admit that the police were under instructions from the Narendra Modi administration not to act firmly.``
By the afternoon of February 27, retaliatory attacks had already begun, including the stabbing of a Muslim man in Vadodara railway station as crowds gathered awaiting the arrival of the Sabarmati Express.55 Starting on the morning of February 28, Hindu mobs unleashed a coordinated attack against Muslims in many of Gujarat`s towns and cities.56 Despite the state`s claims that police were simply overwhelmed by the sheer size of the Hindu mobs-often numbering in the thousands-evidence collected by the media, Indian human rights groups, and Human Rights Watch all point to state sponsorship of the attacks. Eyewitness accounts cited throughout this report, as well as the history of police and political recruitment demonstrate the state`s partisan role. In a matter of days, over 850 people are known to have been killed-although unofficial estimates are as high as 2,000. Violence continued as of this writing and has quickly spread to poorly protected rural areas. Accounts of politicians directing the violence are also commonplace. Furthermore, in many cases, police posts and police stations were in close proximity to affected sites.
After allowing thirty-six hours to pass without any serious intervention, the first of several contingents of army troops were deployed into Ahmedabad, Rajkot, and Vadodara on March 1.58 Many had to be flown in from reserves` stations in south Indian as the bulk of Indian forces are stationed along the India-Pakistan border. Though the army arrived in Gujarat soon after the Godhra carnage,60 the state government refused to deploy the soldiers until twenty-fours hours after they arrived and only once the worst violence had ended.61 The army`s inability to rapidly intervene was also hindered by the state government`s failure to provide requested transportation support and information regarding areas where violence was occurring. Speaking on why the army took so long to quell the violence, an Indian army source stated, ``We are ordered to be deployed only when such incidents happen. And once we are there it is up to that state administration how they use us.``
In Ahmedabad, Gujarat`s commercial capital and the site of Human Rights Watch`s investigations, many attacks took place within view of police posts and police stations. Human Rights Watch viewed several police posts less than fifty feet from the site of burnt Muslim-owned restaurants, places of businesses, and hotels in Ahmedabad. Without exception, the Hindu-owned establishments neighboring the destroyed structures were unscathed. The same pattern was observed by India`s National Human Rights Commission during its fact-finding mission in March (see below).
Attacks in Ahmedabad on February 28 also began at precisely the same time, around 10:30 in the morning. Muslims living in ``mixed communities,`` that is alongside Hindus, were hit the hardest while those concentrated in Muslim enclaves following a history of state communal riots fared only marginally better.
According to an article in The Week, a weekly Indian news magazine, 1,679 houses, 1,965 shops, and twenty-one godowns (warehouses) were burnt, 204 shops looted, and seventy-six shrines were destroyed in Ahmedabad. The great majority of them belonged to Muslims.
Dozens of witnesses interviewed by Human Rights Watch described almost identical operations. The attackers arrived by the thousands in trucks, clad in saffron scarves and khaki shorts, the signature uniform of Hindu nationalist, or Hindutva, groups. Shouting slogans of incitement to kill, they were armed with swords, trishuls, 65 sophisticated explosives, and gas cylinders. Guided by computer printouts listing the addresses of Muslim families and their properties, information obtained from the Ahmedabad municipal corporation among other sources, they embarked on a murderous rampage. In many cases, the police led the charge, aiming and firing at Muslims who got in the mobs` way
According to the preliminary report of SAHMAT, a Delhi-based nongovernmental organization, its fact-finding team found graffiti left behind on the charred walls of a burnt madrassa in Sundaramnagar, Ahmedabad boasted of police support:
Yeh andar ki bat hai
Police hamarey saath hai
(This is inside information, the police are with us).
Jaan se mar dengey
Bajrang Dal zindabad
Narendra Modi zindabad
(We will kill. Long live the Bajrang Dal. Long live Narendra Modi).
Andar ki bat hai... was also the war-cry used to terrorize Muslim residents in Vadi in the city of Vadodara as they burnt Muslim-owned shops that ironically sold kites, bindis, and bangles for Hindu festivals.
Human Rights Watch interviews with eyewitnesses to the attacks revealed that that the attackers were carrying voter lists as well as listings of Muslim businesses, along with cell phones and water bottles ``so as to be fully prepared for a long day`s work.`` According to a report in Outlook magazine, attempts to pinpoint the exact location of Muslim businesses began months before the attacks:
In Ahmedabad... one official recalled how for the last few months, there had been concerted attempts to get lists of Muslim business establishments from the Ahmedabad municipal corporation.... VHP volunteers have also been making the rounds of professional institutions and universities, seeking the names and addresses of Muslim students. Some government sources say VHP members have drawn up lists of government departments (for example, the Food Corporation of India) and their allied agencies, and identified ``undesirables`` and their addresses.
Professor Keshavram Kashiram Shastri, ninety-six-year-old chairman of the Gujarat unit of the VHP denied the charge that the VHP prepared lists in advance of Muslim shops to loot. To the contrary, he said ``the list of shops owned by Muslims in Ahmedabad was prepared on the morning of February 28 itself.``
Voter lists were also reportedly used to identify and target Muslim community members. A senior police officer told rediff.com, a leading Internet news site on India, on conditions of anonymity that, ``[The attackers] hardly failed to lay hands on their targets, thanks to documents like the voters` list.... The mission was accomplished with clinical precision.``
In many cases the leaders of the attack, who communicated with one another on cell phones, receiving instructions in seemingly well-coordinated and planned operations, have been identified by name in police reports as members of the BJP and the VHP. Few, if any, of the leaders have been arrested .
As the state offers one excuse after another-that the police were outnumbered, overwhelmed, did not receive orders to respond, or that their own feelings could not be ``insulated from the general social milieu`` -no excuse proves sufficient to explain the direct participation of police in the attacks.
Press reports and eyewitness testimonies, including those collected by Human Rights Watch, abound with stories of police participation and complicity in the attacks. Their crimes range from inaction to direct participation in the looting and burning of Muslim shops, restaurants, hotels, homes, and the killing of Muslim residents. Worse still, officers who tried to keep the peace or act against murderous mobs have been transferred or have faced the wrath of their superiors.
A key state minister is reported to have taken over a police control room in Ahmedabad on the first day of the carnage, issuing directions not to rescue Muslims in danger of being killed:
If VHP-BJP leaders led mobs from the front along with the police, they also took control of the institutional apparatus. Health Minister Ashok Bhatt sat in the Police Control Room in Ahmedabad through the first two days of violence. Given his portfolio, it was an odd place to be but not given his past. Bhatt, along with Union Minister of State for Defence Harin Pathak, faces charges of having incited a mob that murdered a police constable in the course of communal violence on April 25, 1985. According to several eyewitnesses, another State Minister, Harin Pandya, moved through the Paldi area, speaking to leaders of mobs that were burning Muslim homes and shops. [State Home Minister Gordhan] Jhadaphia, who ought to have been in the control room after the violence broke out on February , was busy telling reporters that he ``did not expect Hindus to retaliate.``
Many people testified that the police led the mobs directly to their homes and places of business. In many instances, the police also fired upon Muslim youth, crushing any organized self-defense against the mobs.
A human rights activist who has been visiting relief camps in Ahmedabad on an almost daily basis since the attacks and documenting in detail the nature and methodology of the violence provided valuable insight into the patterns that emerged:
Most incidents happened at the same time. It was definitely pre-planned. Many were around 10:30 a.m. The role of the police was also very clear. When I interviewed victims, they said that prior to the attacks mass meetings were taking place that were being addressed by local VHP and Bajrang Dal leaders. A rumor was already going around that something was going to happen, long before the Godhra incident.
The attacks also took place where the Muslim population is low, in areas where people could not adequately defend or protect themselves. The police itself was also involved in almost all incidents. Local MLAs [members of legislative assembly] and corporators [local officials] were also involved. In many cases SRP [State Reserve Police] camps were close by. Everybody knew that attacks were going on but no one tried to prevent them. So many women had been gang-raped and then killed.... Usually in our work we address individual incidents so we have hope for justice. But there is no hope here because the involvement of the police is so high. You feel irrelevant, like you have wasted ten years.
Twenty-six major towns and talukas (sub-districts) in Gujarat were affected in the first week of violence. Attacks had also spread to rural areas. In Halad village in north Gujarat, for example, hotels and businesses belonging to Muslims were attacked when the dead body of a Hindu activist killed in the train attack in Godhra was brought to the village.78 The patterns of violence in the worst-hit cities, where the majority of people killed were Muslim, were remarkably similar, lending further support to the notion that the attacks were planned and not the result of spontaneous riots. An interim report on violence in Vadodara submitted to the NHRC by the nongovernmental People`s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), for example, documents in meticulous detail the selective burning and looting of Muslim homes and places of business, the destruction of mosques, the killing, beating, and maiming of Muslims, the extent of police participation in the attacks, and the role of the local media in inciting the violence. The report also documents the spreading of hate propaganda leading to economic boycotts. A separate report by PUCL outlines the impact on women (see below).
At this writing, attacks were being reported on an almost daily basis, over six weeks after the state government`s claims that the situation had been brought under control. On March 24, for example, thirty-year-old Mumtazbano was stripped in public and stabbed to death by a mob in the Vejalpur area of Ahmedabad after being dragged off her husband`s scooter.80 On April 6, at least five people were killed in Ahmedabad. Two were stabbed to death and three were killed by police gunfire as police reportedly fired to disperse clashing groups of Hindus and Muslims.81 On April 17, three people were stabbed to death and fifteen were injured in Hindu-Muslim clashes in Ahmedabad.
POLICE FIRINGS
``They only shot at one side. Why? Why didn`t they shoot to stop the attackers?``
Numerous eyewitnesses to the attacks in Ahmedabad told Human Rights Watch that police gunfire paved the way for the violent mobs. Marching in front of the mobs, the police burst tear gas shells and aimed and fired at Muslim youth seeking to defend their families and their homes. According to a report in The Week, a weekly Indian news magazine, in the month following the Godhra massacre, 120 people had been killed in police shootings throughout the state, many of them Muslim.84 At this writing, the numbers were climbing. Hindus were also killed in police shootings, some in response to shoot-on-sight orders issued by Chief Minister Modi on March 1 to stop those participating in rioting and arson, and others in the weeks that followed as police tried to contain outbreaks of violence.
During the first two days of violence, Chief Minister Modi defended the actions of his police stating that they had ``mowed down people`` to quell the violence. According to the Indian Express, ``one such incident he was referring to occurred on February 28 and March 1 near the Bapunagar police station, where 40 were killed in firing. Now, according to a batch of FIRs filed last week and post mortem reports, it has come to light that all 40 were Muslims, most of them shot in the head and the chest. And 36 of them were between 20 and 25 years old.``
A resident of the Chartoda Kabristan camp in the Gomtipur area told Human Rights Watch: ``We were able to handle the crowd but when the police joined in then we couldn`t stop them. Our spirit was broken. They were shouting, `Kill them, cut them, look for Miyabhai [Muslim man].` The police burned the houses with their own hands. They also looted. Now everyone is afraid of the police; they were only firing on Muslims. They were not firing for riot control.``
According to the Chartoda Kabristan camp organizer:
From the areas represented in this camp, twenty-five people were hit in police and private firings. Sixteen died, the rest are in hospitals.... There are still burnings going on.... If they keep dividing people then people will keep losing faith in this state. They need to put a brake on it. If the state does not want to stop it then it will keep happening. Everyone will tell you that the police came first, fired and then the private attackers came.88
Twenty-five-year-old Abdul Aziz, a resident of Panna Lal ki Chali, near Chartoda Kabristan, witnessed the killing of his brother by police gunfire. He told Human Rights Watch:
On the 28th afternoon at 3 p.m. my younger brother was returning from work. The police said that a curfew was in place. A crowd gathered to attack. The police was leading the crowd. They were looting and the people followed, looting and burning behind them. The crowd was shouting, ``Go to Pakistan. If you want to stay here become Hindu.`` The police very clearly aimed at my brother and fired at him. He was twenty-three years old. At 6 p.m., three hours later, we were able to get him to the hospital.... We have not filed any complaints. All the doctors that have been coming here are private or from NGOs.
Julamasul Abdul Bhai Kureishi, of Danzi ki Chali near Chartoda Kabristan, lost his son to police gunfire. He told Human Rights Watch:
They made us homeless and they took my son.... The police came from one side and the crowd came from the other. They started setting fire to things and firing shots. My son was shot and killed. He was twenty-two years old. They collected all the young men. The police were calling the crowds. The police had the mob behind them.
Another resident of Danzi ki Chali told Human Rights Watch: ``The police grabbed me and hit me with a sword and a lathi [baton]. They also shot my seven-year-old son. He spent eleven to twelve days in the hospital.``
Twenty-two-year-old Mohammed Salim from Bara Sache ki Chali told Human Rights Watch that most of the deaths in his neighborhood were caused by police shooting. He described a pattern testified to by many interviewed by Human Rights Watch:
The Hindus called us outside to fight. When we came out, the police fired on us, twelve to thirteen people died.... They said come forward, then they started shouting, ``Kill the Muslims, cut the Muslims, loot the Muslims.`` The police were with them and picked out the Muslim homes and set them on fire. The police aimed and fired at the Muslim boys. They then joined with the Hindus to set fire to the homes and to loot the homes. The police were carrying kerosene bottles and shooting and setting the bottles on fire. The others were carrying swords and trishuls. Some of the attackers were wearing kesri pattis [saffron bandannas] on their foreheads with the words ``Jai Sri Ram`` [Praise Lord Ram]. The attackers consisted of both people from our neighborhood and also people from outside. None of the deaths from our area were from the Bajrang Dal, it was all from police firing. One person also lost his eyesight as a result of police firing. One woman was burnt alive. She was old and couldn`t run. She was cut in three pieces. The police came inside [the Chartoda Kabristan area] and fired.
A fifteen-year-old boy named Sanu from the Riyaz Hussain ki Chali was also killed. According to residents of the Chartoda Kabristan camp, ``The police caught him from inside the Masjid, took him to the Hindu area and shot him at close range.``
MASS GRAVESITES AND COLLECTION OF BODIES
Surviving family members have faced the added trauma of having to fend for themselves in recovering and identifying the bodies of their loved ones under difficult security conditions and with little assistance from the state government. The bodies have been buried in mass gravesites throughout Ahmedabad. Many bodies have been charred beyond recognition and many are still missing. To bury hundreds of Muslim victims, mass gravesites have sprouted throughout the city of Ahmedabad. A March 6 article on the news site rediff.com reported that as many as 212 bodies of men, women, and children were buried in graveyards in Dudheshwar, Juhapura, Sarkhej, and Sarangpur-all in Ahmedabad-since March 3, 2002.
Human Rights Watch visited a gravesite in the Shahibaug area of Ahmedabad. According to gravediggers there: ``The state government has not given one paisa [one cent]. No one asks. One police car would accompany a truck full of bodies. Our young would go around and look for the bodies. We use our own trucks.``93 When asked about the events of the last several weeks, eighty-five-year-old gravekeeper Abdul Kadir simply said: ``I cannot even talk about it.`` Another gravekeeper added, ``New incidents are happening so more bodies keep coming.``94 Gravekeepers claimed to have already buried close to three hundred bodies at the gravesite. Human Rights Watch was shown a metal leg brace that survived the burning of its owner to illustrate the story of a handicapped person`s murder. A resident of the Chartoda Kabristan camp in Gomtipur told Human Rights Watch: ``We ourselves collected and buried the bodies. The military came with us for protection.``
ATTACKS ON WOMEN
I have never known a riot which has used the sexual subjugation of women so widely as an instrument of violence as in the recent mass barbarity in Gujarat. There are reports everywhere of gang-rape, of young girls and women, often in the presence of members of their families, followed by their murder by burning alive, or by bludgeoning with a hammer and in one case with a screw driver. Women in the Aman Chowk shelter told appalling stories about how armed men disrobed themselves in front of a group of terrified women to cower them down further.
Tragically consistent with the longstanding pattern of attacks on minorities and Dalits (or so-called untouchables) in India, and with previous episodes of large-scale communal violence in India, scores of Muslim girls and women were brutally raped in Gujarat before being killed.
A resident of Jawan Nagar, Naroda, Ahmedabad told the Citizens` Initiative that only four out of his eleven family members had survived. His daughter was raped and burned, succumbing to her injuries in the hospital:
My house has a small grocery store and I was there in the store. A mob came from Charanagar. Five hundred strong mob came from Kubernagar. Two thousand strong mob came. They started riot, burning houses. We ran to nearby Gangotri society and took shelter on the terrace. The mob started burning people at around 5 or 6 o`clock in the evening. The mob stripped all the girls of the locality including my 22-year-old daughter and raped them. My daughter was engaged. Seven members of my family were burnt that includes my wife (age 40), my son (18), my son (14), my son (7), my daughter (4), my daughter (2). Police did not allow me to climb down from the terrace. My 8-year-old son has survived with 20 percent burn injuries and he remembers his mother. What can I do? My house and shop has been burnt.... They hit her on the head and burnt. She had 80 percent burn injuries.
Even pregnant women were not spared. In some cases, their bellies were cut open and the fetus was pulled out before the women were killed. A gravedigger at a mass grave site next to the Dariyakhan Ghummat camp in the Shahibaug area told Human Rights Watch: ``There were at least three pregnant women and one of the fetuses was partially hanging out. We had to stick it back in before burial. If the fetus was completely removed then we left it out but still buried it with the mother.``
A woman who washed the bodies of female victims before burial at the same site told Human Rights Watch about the conditions of the bodies upon arrival:
I washed the ladies` bodies before burial. Some bodies had heads missing, some had hands missing, some were like coal, you would touch them and they would crumble. Some women`s bodies had been split down the middle. I washed seventeen bodies on March 2, only one was completely intact. All had been burned, many had been split down the middle. On March 3 fifteen more bodies came. Then I just threw water over them, I couldn`t stand to be around them anymore.
Some of the cuts down the middle of the bodies may have been a consequence of official autopsies, though not all.
A report sponsored by the Citizens` Initiative dated April 16, 2002 and titled ``The Survivors Speak`` presents over thirty pages of testimony from female victims and eyewitnesses to the violence in Gujarat. The report is based on investigations conducted at the end of March by a fact-finding team of prominent women`s rights activists. Among the report`s most significant findings is the fact that crimes against women, in both urban and rural areas, have been grossly underreported and under-recorded by the police. The report states:
Among the women surviving in relief camps, are many who have suffered the most bestial forms of sexual violence - including rape, gang rape, mass rape, stripping, insertion of objects into their body, stripping, molestations. A majority of rape victims have been burnt alive.
There is evidence of State and Police complicity in perpetuating crimes against women. No effort was made to protect women. No Mahila [women] Police [were] deployed. State and Police complicity in these crimes is continuing, as women survivors continue to be denied the right to file FIRs. There is no existing institutional mechanism in Gujarat through which women can seek justice.
Among the testimonies documented in the report is that of Saira from Panchmahals district, Gujarat. Her name has been changed by Human Rights Watch:
On the afternoon of February 28th to escape the violent mob, about 40 of us got on to a tempo [a vehicle]. My husband was driving the tempo... a Maruti car was blocking the road. A mob was lying in wait. [My husband] had to swerve. The tempo overturned. As we got out they started attacking us. People started running in all directions. Some of us ran towards the river. I fell behind as I was carrying my son. The men caught me from behind and threw me on the ground. [My son] fell from my arms and started crying. My clothes were stripped off by the men and I was left stark naked. One by one the men raped me. All the while I could hear my son crying. I lost count after 3. They then cut my foot with a sharp weapon and left me there in that state.
The report also cites the extent of Bajrang Dal and VHP participation in the attacks, adding that members of these organizations were distributing arms in rural areas as early as six months before the violence began.
An interim report by the People`s Union for Civil Liberties on ``women`s experiences and perspectives`` on the communal violence in Vadodara, based on data collected between February 27 and March 26, 2002, states:
The wide range of data collected reveals that the post-Godhra carnage has affected most women living in Vadodara in some way or the other. Lives of minority women have of course changed drastically. However, women from all communities are also affected by the reign of fear and the terror promoted by the state and the police. The Hindu women are caught in a fear psychosis that the ``other`` will attack. A lot of this has to do with the rumours that are being systematically spread through various pamphlets and booklets. Livelihoods of all poor, working class women have been affected. The situation in the minority households is far more serious, and hunger has become an acute problem because the minority men too cannot go out to work. The deep sense of betrayal that women feel by neighbours and children ``who grew up in front of my eyes [or in my aangan]`` is seen across classes.105
On April 24 India`s National Commission for Women (NCW) added its voice to those of the National Commission for Minorities and the National Human Rights Commission (see below) and accused the Gujarat government of ``failing to perform its constitutional duty.`` NCW expressed concern over the state of fear and insecurity in the state, particularly among women, adding that much more needed to be done for the relief and rehabilitation of women, particularly those that had lost family members or were victims of sexual violence.1
THE EFFECT ON CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE
The children of Gujarat have been severely affected and traumatized by the violence. In addition to the rape and murder of many children (see above), many bore witness to the death of their family members.107 Unclaimed and unidentified children`s bodies still crowd Ahmedabad`s morgues. Many children have also been orphaned or have suffered serious stabbing and burn injuries. In the aftermath of the violence, their education has been severely disrupted and little counseling is available to them to cope with the trauma of what they experienced. A Citizens` Initiative fact-finding team on violence against women in Gujarat (see above) spoke to young girls from Naroda Patia still trying to make sense of the rapes that they had witnessed. One girl interviewed said:
``Mein bataoon Didi`` (Shall I tell you?), volunteers a nine-year-old, ``Balatkaar ka matlab jab aurat ko nanga karte hain aur phir use jala deta hain.`` (Rape is when a woman is stripped naked and then burnt) And then looks fixedly at the floor. Only a child can tell it like it is. For this is what happened again and again in Naroda Patia - women were stripped, raped and burnt. Burning has now become an essential part of the meaning of rape.
Nineteen-year-old Sheikh S. from Mehndi Kuva, Shahpur, slum quarters in Ahmedabad, explained the long-term consequences of the attacks on children`s education and on the livelihood of affected families:
All the children`s education has been disrupted. All businesses are closed. All savings are gone. My parents are so old they cannot go back to work. I will surely have to leave my studies now and go to work. I was studying in the 11th standard. Still we won`t get the government jobs, those are given to Hindus. We will have to do labor.
Sheikh added that in the looting and burning of his home, his education certificates and other valuables were also destroyed: ``All my education certificates and medical reports that were in a suitcase were also destroyed. I have a blood disease and need those reports.``
In addition to destruction of educational records, students have been attacked while going to school. An eighteen-year-old student in Bharuch was pulled off a rickshaw and hit on the head and killed while returning home after taking a board exam.112 In Modasa, the college-aged son of a police inspector was stabbed and killed.113 The violence has also led to school exams being postponed in Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Bharuch, and Modasa.114 In addition, at Gujarat University, exams have not yet been completed because mobs have been successful in disrupting exams. The school plans on completing exams by having police vans stationed in sensitive areas.115 There are also disturbing reports that the same groups which collected information on Muslim shops and residences in preparation for attacks, are now openly collecting information on the number of Muslim children in each school in order to intimidate Muslim children from attending.116 Principals of English-medium schools in Gujarat have also been threatened with violence by VHP members if they did not expel Muslim students from their institutions. According to one report, parents are being told by school officials to remove their children from these schools on the grounds that their safety could not be guaranteed. The tactics are helping to ensure that Muslim children are confined to madrasas, or Muslim-run religious schools, where education is imparted in Hindi or Urdu-limiting severely the students` career prospects.
DESTRUCTION OF MOSQUES AND DURGAS:
Attackers also destroyed Dargahs, traditional meeting grounds for Hindus and Muslims and razed mosques. In some cases makeshift Hindu temples were erected in their place. In many places saffron flags, the signature flag of Hindu nationalist groups, were dug deep into mosque domes.118 Roughly twenty mosques were destroyed in Ahmedabad alone, many on March 1 during Friday prayers.119 Even historical monuments were not spared. According to the preliminary report of an Indian human rights fact-finding team:
The famous 500-year-old masjid in Isanpur, which was an ASI [Archeological Survey of India] monument, was destroyed with the help of cranes and bulldozers. The famous Urdu Poet Wali Gujarati`s dargah was also razed to the ground at Shahibaug in Ahmedabad. While a hanuman [a Hindu god] shrine was built over its debris initially, all that was removed overnight and the plot was [paved] and merged with the adjoining road. No authority claimed any knowledge about the entire episode. It is worth noting here that the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, which is responsible for the maintenance of all these structures, and for the building of roads, is run by the Congress [party] with a near two-thirds majority.

Noorani Masjid, a destroyed mosque in the Naroda Patia neighborhood of Ahmedabad. On February 28 at least sixty-five people were killed in Naroda Patia by a 5,000-strong mob aided by the police. The attackers killed, mutilated, and burned Muslim residents of the neighborhood, gang-raped women and girls, and torched and looted their homes. The Noorani Masjid was destroyed using exploding gas cylinders. © 2002 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch
More problems and possibly violence may ensue in deciding how and whether to reconstruct the shattered mosques on these the new religious sites.
LOOTING:
The brutal killing and sexual violence was also accompanied by widespread looting and burning of homes. For many the violence became an excuse for daylight robbery in which even affluent Gujaratis took part. Most relief camp inhabitants are now homeless and completely dispossessed of all their belongings. Numerous victims testified to the extent of the theft and looting of their property both during the attacks and in the days that followed after they had fled for safety to makeshift camps.
A fifty-year-old woman named Fatu Bhen from Sanjay Nagar Nanachiloda, an area just outside of Ahmedabad, told Human Rights Watch, ``When they attacked we ran into the fields. For one day and one night we hid in the fields. Then we walked to Gandhinagar. My brother brought me here. We didn`t even have a chance to lock our doors. My brother went back to see and found that everything had been burned and looted.``
http://www.hrw.org/photos/2002/india/images/3.jpg``>
A makeshift Hindu temple flying a saffron flag in Gomptipur, Ahmedabad. One of many erected in Muslim neighborhoods and on the site of destroyed mosques. The words painted on the wall say, in Hindi, “Lord Ram.” © 2002 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch
Jinat A., a forty-year-old woman from Naroda Patia, told Human Rights Watch:
The riots came, we ran. We saw people getting cut up and burned. They used swords and sharp weapons. The first two days we were somewhere else and then we came to the camp. They stole all our things and burned our homes. They took our TVs, tapes, everything, even the beds. They took everything.... We have been here since March 1. We arrived at 3 a.m. Where will we go? The curfews are set. The police killed as well.
Thirty-year-old Noorjehan belonged to a relatively affluent Muslim family and lived in the government quarter of Mehndi Kuva. Out of a total of thirty-six homes, only three belonged to Muslims. The rest belonged to Hindus. Noorjehan suffered severe head injuries but survived the attack after being left for dead. Visibly in pain and with fresh bandages around her head, she told Human Rights Watch:
On February 28 we were all sitting at home and heard a noise, this was around noon. Our Hindu neighbor said, ``Don`t go out.`` If he said go then we could have run and saved ourselves. He was drunk. Everyone started to surround the house. They all had swords and pipes. I locked the doors. They then broke down the main door. They threw an iron pipe through the iron bars, which hit me across my eyes. I got dizzy. They then started to set fire to things. I tried to close all the doors as fast as I could, but they came in and hit me with pipes all over on my head, my legs. They were about to take out a sword and cut me with it. But one Hindu had pity on me I guess and said, ``Don`t cut her, set her on fire.`` When I heard that I fainted. When I fainted they took off all of my jewels. They were screaming, ``Ram bol.`` [Say Ram]. I think they then put me on top of the fire. My twelve-year-old niece dragged me off and threw water on me to save me. I was covered in blood. I had sent my brothers away; they went to hide in another Hindu`s house. They thought I was dead so they moved on to the next Muslim house. My mother took me inside the house. A Dalit scavenger brought the doctor to me. They gave me an injection because I was going to hemorrhage. Finally the family doctor came. I was vomiting for two days. The police were nowhere. They did not help anyone. When we called they said, ``You protect yourselves.`` The police are only two minutes away from our home.
After Noorjehan and her family left for the camp they learned that their home had been looted:
We contacted this camp by mobile phone and people here sent a car for us and brought us here. After we came our house was looted. They didn`t even leave our animals. My mother was so fond of raising those animals. They took them, cut them, and ate them: our sheep, our chickens. There was a temple in front of our house. They ate the animals there the next day. They took our gold, our silver. We had four safes in the house. All of them were looted. They took our cutlery as well.
Noorjehan believed her neighbors were involved in the attacks and had long been participating in meetings to plot attacks against Muslims:
In previous riots, we used to close the main gates to the residential quarters, but not this time. The people inside were mixed up with this so they left the big gates open. They were always meeting about how to go after Muslims but we never believed it would happen to us, we have been there for so many years. I can`t sleep properly. They are enemies of humanity. They are complete monsters and devils.
Noorjehan and her family arrived at the camp on the evening of March 1: ``We left even without our shoes on. No one has come to ask us anything about who attacked us or how much was taken. On March 2 or 3 we filed a complaint. My mother went back on March 16 to see what had become of our home.``127 Her mother added: ``I went to see if any of my animals were left. There was nothing left. The people were still roaming the area with swords.``
Unlike residents of Naroda Patia, Noorjehan very much wanted to return to her home but lamented that it was too unsafe. ``If we got security then at least we could go back home,`` she said.
Rehman Pata, Noorjehan`s twenty-year-old brother described the reaction of the police when he approached them for help during the attack on his home:
I ran to the police station, I fought the crowds to get through. Two constables told me, ``You go and we`ll follow you.`` But they never came. I came home and saw that my sister had been hit by a pipe.... These were Shiv Sena and VHP workers. We know the names of some of the people who did this. After the attack one of them made a call and told the person he was talking to move on to the next Muslim home. They were coordinating everything on their cell phones. We filed a complaint against them. They didn`t leave anything, even my childhood toys.... One of our Hindu neighbors told the mob not to burn our home otherwise theirs would catch on fire as well. He said, ``Don`t burn it just loot it.``
Nineteen-year-old Sheikh S., also from Mehndi Kuva, lived in a slum quarter adjacent to the government quarter. He told Human Rights Watch that his neighbors were involved in the attacks and that police gave them their blessing to loot Muslim shops and homes:
It all started at 10 a.m. on February 28. They came after the Muslim shops. Around 8 p.m., they attacked my quarters. They were screaming, ``Jai Shri Ram.`` They opened the locks with their iron pipes. They burned all the beddings but took all the nice things. They did not set fire to our house because it was a flat system and Hindu homes would also have been affected. We were calling the police all day. The police said, ``You help yourselves, we are getting pressure from above, we cannot help you.`` We called fifty to a hundred times. Around 2:00 or 2:30 p.m. I saw a police inspector shake hands with the attackers and say, ``You can loot peacefully, we won`t do anything. We are with you.``
Sheikh listed the names of those involved in the attacks, many of whom he recognized. He then added:
We filed a complaint and wrote down all the names. During the attack, thirty to thirty-five went to hide in a Goanese Christian home after 6 p.m. Then the crowd surrounded that home and said, ``You send them out or we will kill you too.`` After that we came here to the camp with police escorts. We called the camp on our mobile phone and they sent the police to us to bring us here. We arrived March 1 at 1 a.m. We then called the Christian family from here and they told us the crowds started looting the homes on March 1. Our dowry, marriage money, machines, etc. all of them were looted. They even took the two lights and the wiring and the fan. They took everything. They took my brother`s new cycle but set my old one on fire.132
Sheikh also sustained head injuries during the attacks and still wore a dressing on the wounds at the time of the interview three weeks later: ``At one point they surrounded me and started shouting, `Miya, Miya` [Muslim, Muslim]. They started throwing stones and I ran upstairs.133
THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA:
While the national Indian press has played an important role in exposing the violence and official neglect or misconduct, sectors of the local press have been accused of inciting the violence.
On April 5, 2002, the People`s Union for Civil Liberties and Shanti Abhiyan, both nongovernmental organizations, issued a comprehensive analysis of the role of the media during the violence in Gujarat. Among the papers analyzed is the Vadodara edition of Sandesh, a Gujarati newspaper. The report concludes that the major effort of Sandesh for the period under review ``has been to feed on the prevalent anti-Muslim prejudices of its Hindu readership and provoke it further by sensationalizing, twisting, mangling and distorting news or what passes for it.``134
Sandesh published especially inflammatory headlines, pictures, and stories the day after the Godhra attack. For example, a front page report on February 28, 2002, read: ``AVENGE BLOOD WITH BLOOD.`` Another headline during the first week of March, when Gujarati Muslims were returning from their pilgrimage (Haj) to Mecca, stated: ``HINDUS BEWARE: HAJ PILIGRIMS RETURN WITH A DEADLY CONSPIRACY.`` In fact, most Muslims returning from Haj were so terrified of being attacked that they sought and received escorts home by army officials.
ATTACKS AGINST THE MEDIA
According to the Paris-based Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), some twenty journalists and media workers were attacked by the police on April 7, 2002, in Gandhi Ashram, Ahmedabad while two peace demonstrations were disrupted by members of the Gujarat Yuva Morcha, a youth section of the BJP. A cameraman for the private television station NDTV was told by a deputy police superintendent to stop filming. When he asked why, he was struck on the head and later was admitted to the hospital`s intensive care unit. Witnesses say police then attacked the journalists, seriously injuring several others.RSF adds that a journalist for the Asian Age was beaten up by the Gujarat police while interviewing Muslim women who had complained of police atrocities.
The Government of Gujarat`s Response
The Gujarat government, and in particular its chief minister, has responded to severe criticism regarding its posture during the violence by either tacitly justifying the attacks or asserting that they were quickly brought under control. On March 1, Chief Minister Modi confidently declared that he would control the ``riots resulting from the natural and justified anger of the people.``142 ``Every action has an equal and opposite reaction,`` Modi told reporters. ``The five crore (50 million) people of Gujarat have shown remarkable restraint under grave provocation,`` referring to the Godhra massacre.143
The Gujarat government`s official report of the events, presented to the National Human Rights Commission, includes the following accounts, as reported in the Hindu:
The gory details of the Godhra incident, depicting charred bodies through the electronic media, aroused passions of the people of Gujarat on a very large scale. In the wake of the call for ``Gujarat bandh`` and the possible fall-out of the Godhra incident, the State Government took all possible precautions. However, on account of widespread reporting in the media, incidents of violence on a large-scale started occurring in Ahmedabad, Baroda... Crowds that assembled in the towns were huge and consisted of higher and middle class people. It became difficult even to implement the curfew. Due to timely measures taken by the State Government, major incidents were contained within 72 hours and normality and confidence of the public were restored.144
Tellingly, the report does not once mention the role of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad or the Bajrang Dal, whose members have been named as leaders of the violence in police reports (FIRs), and grossly undercounts the number of mosques and dargahs destroyed and makeshift Hindu temples erected in their place.145
The appointment of retired high court judge K. G. Shah to head a Gujarat state commission of inquiry into possible police inaction or direct complicity and administrative failure during Godhra and its aftermath has also raised concern. Shah`s close association with the BJP government, including his participation on a panel of lawyers representing the state government before the Supreme Court, has left many questioning his ability to conduct an impartial investigation. Dr. Shakeel Ahmed of the Cell for Legal Help and Guidance for the Islamic Relief Committee told the Times of India: ``It`s better if someone from outside is appointed. The state government is involved and is a party to what happened.``146 Even if the Shah commission`s investigations are impartial, his perceived partiality will likely influence victims` willingness to come forward. The history of government-appointed commissions of inquiry in the state, and the country, also raise doubts as to whether the commission`s recommendations will be followed.147 The recommendations of two commissions of inquiry established following the 1969 and 1985 riots have yet to be implemented.

A room in the Dariyakhan Ghummat relief camp in Ahmedabad housing over fifty women and children. The camp held 5,100 people and is one of approximately one hundred relief camps in Gujarat, where 98,000 people, a great majority of them Muslim, have been displaced by the violence. © 2002 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch
#95 Posted by Urstruly on August 9, 2004 9:24:24 am
malik99
The only productive means to address this issue is that we as Pakistani Muslims have a responsibility towards INdian Muslims to help them arm themselves. Had they had a Klashnikov at each houshold the hindu government wouldn`t have dared thinking about massacaring them. Hindus arm themselves while preaching ahimsa to others. After Babri mosque massaccres I think it was criminal negligence on Muslims part not to arm themselves. In the jungle you have to play by the rules of the jungle. Same advice goes to all Pakistanis as well. In the coming days of anarchy they are the one who would have to defend themselves and their families. Just six months ago, when I mentioned anarchy, in the context of Pakistan, I was laughed out of here and now goverment is chasing people with gunship helicopters. It is already proven a fallacy that this war of aggression that GOP has unleashed on its own people will contain itself to one area only. When would people understand that the writ of governments all around the globe is coming to an end. The circle of violence that Americans have put in motion, is irreversible.
The only productive means to address this issue is that we as Pakistani Muslims have a responsibility towards INdian Muslims to help them arm themselves. Had they had a Klashnikov at each houshold the hindu government wouldn`t have dared thinking about massacaring them. Hindus arm themselves while preaching ahimsa to others. After Babri mosque massaccres I think it was criminal negligence on Muslims part not to arm themselves. In the jungle you have to play by the rules of the jungle. Same advice goes to all Pakistanis as well. In the coming days of anarchy they are the one who would have to defend themselves and their families. Just six months ago, when I mentioned anarchy, in the context of Pakistan, I was laughed out of here and now goverment is chasing people with gunship helicopters. It is already proven a fallacy that this war of aggression that GOP has unleashed on its own people will contain itself to one area only. When would people understand that the writ of governments all around the globe is coming to an end. The circle of violence that Americans have put in motion, is irreversible.
#94 Posted by Rajat on August 9, 2004 8:02:31 am
When you meet them tell them that they have at least one brother who cries for them. Not only for them but he cries on the cowardice of his brothers as well for they have no heart to seek justice for their lost sisters. Tell them, their brothers have all died.
Human rights for women in Pakistan needed By Shahnaz Bukhari
This International Human Rights Day, Dec. 10, the condition of human rights of women across the globe continues to be grim. In Pakistan, my home, as well as in many other countries in South Asia, violence against women is exceptionally appalling.
Consider Sabira Khan. When she was 16 years old, she was married to a man 20 years her senior. After the wedding ceremony, he informed her that she would never be allowed to see her parents again, even though their homes were a few minutes walk apart.
A year later, Sabira`s mother came to the house to see her daughter. Angered by the visit, Sabira`s husband and mother-in-law broke Sabira`s nose by smashing her face against the wall. Then they poured kerosene oil over her and set her on fire. Sabira, who was 3 months pregnant at the time, was burned on more than 60 percent of her body.
Unfortunately, Sabira`s plight is not unique.
Every day, at least four women in the country are burned to death by family members, according the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. In the past nine years, more than 6,500 women in the Islamabad-Rawalpindi area of Pakistan (an area covering a 200-mile radius) have been doused in kerosene and set alight by family members. Fewer than 1 percent survived. These cases are rarely prosecuted, and when they are, the conviction rate is barely 4 percent.
Reasons for this abhorrent practice, which is not uncommon in many South Asian countries, include failure to give birth to a son, a man`s desire to marry a second wife without financial means to support the first or a woman`s acrimonious relationship with her mother-in-law.
They are known as honor killings or ``accidental`` stove deaths because the stories offered as explanations in these cases are almost always the same: ``She was cooking food when the stove exploded.``
In 1986, I founded the Progressive Women`s Association. I use my own home as a shelter for female victims of violence and their children. It`s the only one of its kind in the Islamabad-Rawalpindi area. At times, up to 30 women sleep at my house.
Our group also provides legal and social services for victims of violence. Over the years, we have dealt with more than 15,000 cases involving wife beating, child abduction, honor killings, the trafficking of women and children, incest and rape.
Not all of the female victims of violence in Pakistan are poor and defenseless. I, myself a member of the educated elite, have suffered warnings, death threats and abuse as a result of my work.
In the spring of 2002, the police raided and shut down our shelter, and a Sharia (Islamic law) court judge accused me of ``abetting an attempt to commit adultery`` and tried me under traditional Federal Sharia (Islamic) law. Though I was eventually exonerated in that case, I was forced to send my children to live overseas in fear of their safety.
Nothing in the Quran condones violence against women. Islam is a gentle religion. In the past, it abolished repressive and cruel practices committed against females, such as barter of women and female infanticide. To blame religion for this violence is a great disservice to Islam. The blame lies with the religious and political elements that are exploiting people for their personal gain.
Any humanitarian-aid programs or financial packages for Pakistan from foreign governments, including the United States, should be conditional on the Pakistani government taking steps to protect the victims of honor crimes and prosecute the offenders.
As for Sabira Kahn, she now manages the crisis center of the Progressive Women`s Association. Her husband and mother-in-law remain free. If we can find a plastic surgeon, we are hoping to reconstruct her eyelids, which were burned off. And if we can rebuild her ears, someday she may be able to wear glasses.
Sabira and many other women like her deserve a better life.
Human rights for women in Pakistan needed By Shahnaz Bukhari
This International Human Rights Day, Dec. 10, the condition of human rights of women across the globe continues to be grim. In Pakistan, my home, as well as in many other countries in South Asia, violence against women is exceptionally appalling.
Consider Sabira Khan. When she was 16 years old, she was married to a man 20 years her senior. After the wedding ceremony, he informed her that she would never be allowed to see her parents again, even though their homes were a few minutes walk apart.
A year later, Sabira`s mother came to the house to see her daughter. Angered by the visit, Sabira`s husband and mother-in-law broke Sabira`s nose by smashing her face against the wall. Then they poured kerosene oil over her and set her on fire. Sabira, who was 3 months pregnant at the time, was burned on more than 60 percent of her body.
Unfortunately, Sabira`s plight is not unique.
Every day, at least four women in the country are burned to death by family members, according the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. In the past nine years, more than 6,500 women in the Islamabad-Rawalpindi area of Pakistan (an area covering a 200-mile radius) have been doused in kerosene and set alight by family members. Fewer than 1 percent survived. These cases are rarely prosecuted, and when they are, the conviction rate is barely 4 percent.
Reasons for this abhorrent practice, which is not uncommon in many South Asian countries, include failure to give birth to a son, a man`s desire to marry a second wife without financial means to support the first or a woman`s acrimonious relationship with her mother-in-law.
They are known as honor killings or ``accidental`` stove deaths because the stories offered as explanations in these cases are almost always the same: ``She was cooking food when the stove exploded.``
In 1986, I founded the Progressive Women`s Association. I use my own home as a shelter for female victims of violence and their children. It`s the only one of its kind in the Islamabad-Rawalpindi area. At times, up to 30 women sleep at my house.
Our group also provides legal and social services for victims of violence. Over the years, we have dealt with more than 15,000 cases involving wife beating, child abduction, honor killings, the trafficking of women and children, incest and rape.
Not all of the female victims of violence in Pakistan are poor and defenseless. I, myself a member of the educated elite, have suffered warnings, death threats and abuse as a result of my work.
In the spring of 2002, the police raided and shut down our shelter, and a Sharia (Islamic law) court judge accused me of ``abetting an attempt to commit adultery`` and tried me under traditional Federal Sharia (Islamic) law. Though I was eventually exonerated in that case, I was forced to send my children to live overseas in fear of their safety.
Nothing in the Quran condones violence against women. Islam is a gentle religion. In the past, it abolished repressive and cruel practices committed against females, such as barter of women and female infanticide. To blame religion for this violence is a great disservice to Islam. The blame lies with the religious and political elements that are exploiting people for their personal gain.
Any humanitarian-aid programs or financial packages for Pakistan from foreign governments, including the United States, should be conditional on the Pakistani government taking steps to protect the victims of honor crimes and prosecute the offenders.
As for Sabira Kahn, she now manages the crisis center of the Progressive Women`s Association. Her husband and mother-in-law remain free. If we can find a plastic surgeon, we are hoping to reconstruct her eyelids, which were burned off. And if we can rebuild her ears, someday she may be able to wear glasses.
Sabira and many other women like her deserve a better life.
#93 Posted by malik99 on August 9, 2004 8:02:31 am
I, to this very day, have the image etched in my mind of an Indian Muslim whose picture I saw in a US newspaper. He had his hands clasped in front of him, he was crying, and begging the hindu mob to spare his life. His hair were dirtied with mud, as if he had been dragged for miles. According to the picture`s caption, he was burned alive a few minutes after the picture was taken. Rarely do I have tears in my eyes after seeing a picture. He was my brother, who had not hurt anyone or done anything wrong. His crime was that he was a muslim in a hindu India. And in post-sept 11 period, if a muslim is killed, he probably deserved it.
Stuka, Ana and others, instead of denying the existance of sub-human conditions of majority of Indian Muslims, and entering into a useless shouting match over which interactor said what, I invite you to use this board as a productive means to address this ill. Lets talk about how we can ensure that Gujarat is never repeated, that the women do not have to hide in their houses which are later torched, that the mosques are not destroyed, that the grown men don`t have to cry and beg for their lives.
Stuka, Ana and others, instead of denying the existance of sub-human conditions of majority of Indian Muslims, and entering into a useless shouting match over which interactor said what, I invite you to use this board as a productive means to address this ill. Lets talk about how we can ensure that Gujarat is never repeated, that the women do not have to hide in their houses which are later torched, that the mosques are not destroyed, that the grown men don`t have to cry and beg for their lives.
#92 Posted by mshergill on August 9, 2004 8:02:31 am
The basic fact is that due to poverty in India and Pakistan, both countries have social tensions which flare up. In a hypothetical situation where there are only Hindus in India and say only Muslims of one sect in Pakistan, you would have the same average of killings every year.....maybe it wont be called communal / secatarian violence, but the violence will be there. The human mind is good at finding differences, and blaming one particular part of the community for all their problems. As they say you can look at a nice painting with a magnifying glass and find fault with every brush stroke.
Although I did not witness the Gujrat Riots, I did witness the 1985 Sikh riots from an uncomfortably close distance. My mother is a Hindu and my father is a Sikh, and the day Mrs. G died,I was surrounded 3 times by mobs who had just finished burning a few people and around me there were burning cars. This happened to be in the center of Delhi, just that I was at the wrong time and at the wrong place. Luckily for me, I do not have a Kara or wear any religious objects. One was naturally shaken by the experience, (my legs were wobbling) and the next day I witnessed burning and killing on a massive scale.
Why did so many Sikhs die in Delhi while no Sikh died in Bombay.....a very simple reason, all the sikhs in Bombay collected a huge amount of money and made a donation to Bal sahib Thackrey. So the first statement that Bal Thackrey issued was something like ` It is not a major thing Mrs Gandhi dying ...`. That was the cue for the Shiv Saniks to leave the Sikhs alone.
On the second day I observed the rioters very closely in Delhi. None of them were upset or sad about Mrs. G. It was just an opportunity to loot, rape and do whatever they wanted to without anyone to stop them. They felt very powerful, and most of them were poor people who had little to lose. They have no religion, these people.
I looked at the Sikhs also. During the period before the killing of Mrs. G, they had behaved in a very stupid manner. They (Militants) kidnapped girls and got them to the Golden temple and raped them. So many people were murdered in the Golden Temple by the militants. None of the Sikh politicians had the guts to say anything against the militants. When the Golden temple was stormed by the Army, a sikh told me that he felt like his mother had been raped. My thoughts at that time were that if you turn your mother into a prostitute, rape loses its relevance to a large extent, though maybe not completely. I was amazed to see some close relatives reaction, a lady who used to smoke like a chimney and be very modern suddenly took the role of a traditionally aggrieved Sikh woman.
What was happening in Punjab, the common man was getting it from both the militants as well as the police. Both were extorting money from the common man. The same thing is happening in Kashmir. One good friend of mine is a Muslim Journalist based in Kashmir for the last 4 years. The amount of women that they have kidnapped and raped by the militants, (yes surprise surprise militants) is unimaginable. Despite the people being scared to talk, stories do come out. These so called religious militants extort money and rape in the name of religion. There is nothing religious about them.
And what do the police do. They are no better. There are these `Dalals` who go from locality to locality to find wealthy people. Then the police come and arrest the wealthy mans 21 years son. The next step is to scare the father by the Dalal, who will tell him of all kinds of atrocities which the police will do on his son. The Dalal offers to `help` the father. The father pays 15-20 lakhs and gets the son out, the money being shared by the Dalal and the cops. Note that the police, the Dalal, the militants (Some) as well as the innocent person are all Kashmiris. With the new government in kashmir I have been told that this has come down considerably.
So the point that I am trying to make is that its stupid to think that communal riots are just a matter of two communities not being able to adjust. Its all about power and politics, and religion is just of the clothes that it is garbed in. I for one condem all types of riots.
Although I did not witness the Gujrat Riots, I did witness the 1985 Sikh riots from an uncomfortably close distance. My mother is a Hindu and my father is a Sikh, and the day Mrs. G died,I was surrounded 3 times by mobs who had just finished burning a few people and around me there were burning cars. This happened to be in the center of Delhi, just that I was at the wrong time and at the wrong place. Luckily for me, I do not have a Kara or wear any religious objects. One was naturally shaken by the experience, (my legs were wobbling) and the next day I witnessed burning and killing on a massive scale.
Why did so many Sikhs die in Delhi while no Sikh died in Bombay.....a very simple reason, all the sikhs in Bombay collected a huge amount of money and made a donation to Bal sahib Thackrey. So the first statement that Bal Thackrey issued was something like ` It is not a major thing Mrs Gandhi dying ...`. That was the cue for the Shiv Saniks to leave the Sikhs alone.
On the second day I observed the rioters very closely in Delhi. None of them were upset or sad about Mrs. G. It was just an opportunity to loot, rape and do whatever they wanted to without anyone to stop them. They felt very powerful, and most of them were poor people who had little to lose. They have no religion, these people.
I looked at the Sikhs also. During the period before the killing of Mrs. G, they had behaved in a very stupid manner. They (Militants) kidnapped girls and got them to the Golden temple and raped them. So many people were murdered in the Golden Temple by the militants. None of the Sikh politicians had the guts to say anything against the militants. When the Golden temple was stormed by the Army, a sikh told me that he felt like his mother had been raped. My thoughts at that time were that if you turn your mother into a prostitute, rape loses its relevance to a large extent, though maybe not completely. I was amazed to see some close relatives reaction, a lady who used to smoke like a chimney and be very modern suddenly took the role of a traditionally aggrieved Sikh woman.
What was happening in Punjab, the common man was getting it from both the militants as well as the police. Both were extorting money from the common man. The same thing is happening in Kashmir. One good friend of mine is a Muslim Journalist based in Kashmir for the last 4 years. The amount of women that they have kidnapped and raped by the militants, (yes surprise surprise militants) is unimaginable. Despite the people being scared to talk, stories do come out. These so called religious militants extort money and rape in the name of religion. There is nothing religious about them.
And what do the police do. They are no better. There are these `Dalals` who go from locality to locality to find wealthy people. Then the police come and arrest the wealthy mans 21 years son. The next step is to scare the father by the Dalal, who will tell him of all kinds of atrocities which the police will do on his son. The Dalal offers to `help` the father. The father pays 15-20 lakhs and gets the son out, the money being shared by the Dalal and the cops. Note that the police, the Dalal, the militants (Some) as well as the innocent person are all Kashmiris. With the new government in kashmir I have been told that this has come down considerably.
So the point that I am trying to make is that its stupid to think that communal riots are just a matter of two communities not being able to adjust. Its all about power and politics, and religion is just of the clothes that it is garbed in. I for one condem all types of riots.
#91 Posted by stuka on August 9, 2004 7:24:37 am
Hamid_81
LOL!! I am the kind of Hindu who would gladly support Reservations for Indian Muslims, sacrifice Hindu jobs for Muslims jobs just so that Indian Muslims can be a shining example to the world and a dagger through the heart of Pakistani Muslims like you. HAHAHA!! Your ass is bleeding because I have been cursing you out. Give one example where I cursed a single fellow Indian Muslim. I would never do that. But I have no problems in cursing a dog like you out.
Here`s something to chew about...Pakistani Muslims are not trusted by anyone in the world, whereas Indian Muslims are considered the example for others to follow. Why?
Oh yeah, did you hear about the Bomb Blast in Karachi? Who did that? Hindus or Jews? lol!!
LOL!! I am the kind of Hindu who would gladly support Reservations for Indian Muslims, sacrifice Hindu jobs for Muslims jobs just so that Indian Muslims can be a shining example to the world and a dagger through the heart of Pakistani Muslims like you. HAHAHA!! Your ass is bleeding because I have been cursing you out. Give one example where I cursed a single fellow Indian Muslim. I would never do that. But I have no problems in cursing a dog like you out.
Here`s something to chew about...Pakistani Muslims are not trusted by anyone in the world, whereas Indian Muslims are considered the example for others to follow. Why?
Oh yeah, did you hear about the Bomb Blast in Karachi? Who did that? Hindus or Jews? lol!!
#90 Posted by hamid_81 on August 9, 2004 7:16:01 am
Thanks malik99. I am going to stay cool-headed from now on. Well, Stuka I guess you are only Nanga person that I see in the Hammam right now. Now Stuka is exactly the kind of Hindu who is anti-Muslim. Types like him are participating in etinic cleansing. So Beware BalluKhan, and nikki`s and ana and other Indians. The invitation of teaching some Indian love might be extended to you next. Be ready. LOL.
#89 Posted by kaurasach on August 9, 2004 7:16:01 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#88 Posted by kaurasach on August 9, 2004 7:16:00 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#87 Posted by ballukhan on August 9, 2004 7:16:00 am
The Prosperity and Success of Indian Muslims is the biggest stake through the heart of Pakistani Nationalism. HAHAHA!!
Agreed. I think we all realize that Pakistan studies has unfortunately produced such ar$eholes like Barachota and Hamid that they cannot accept that the fact that Azim Premji, Abdul Kalam, A.R.Rehman, Shahrukh Khan, Ustad Amjad Ali Khan, Ustad Zakir Hussain (to name a few of them) and numerous other achievers in India are muslims.
Hamid- Did you figure out how to play those taans I taught you?? or do you think that sliding the fingers over the daand and doing dir dir is what makes a maestro? And you are yet to answer to my provocative remarks about Rais Khan and his mud wrestling!!
Agreed. I think we all realize that Pakistan studies has unfortunately produced such ar$eholes like Barachota and Hamid that they cannot accept that the fact that Azim Premji, Abdul Kalam, A.R.Rehman, Shahrukh Khan, Ustad Amjad Ali Khan, Ustad Zakir Hussain (to name a few of them) and numerous other achievers in India are muslims.
Hamid- Did you figure out how to play those taans I taught you?? or do you think that sliding the fingers over the daand and doing dir dir is what makes a maestro? And you are yet to answer to my provocative remarks about Rais Khan and his mud wrestling!!
#86 Posted by ana on August 9, 2004 7:15:59 am
not that i need to defend myself because well, obviously i don`t. but i don`t get where the writer of this article is getting the notion that i cussed at him. if pointing out the flaws in his article which are many, and calling him an ignorant and immature boy are gaaliyan then we need to update the english vocabulary. and if saying all those things warranted #51, then so be it.
an apology or non-apology from mr. hamid mahmood is rather irrelevant. we have suffered far too long from communal hatred and bigotry, in india and in pakistan. i just find it sad that as mittarji said, this story was reflecting more of the writer`s hatred and not the pain and anguish that was suffered by so many.
when a writer presents a story which is based on facts, he/she has a responsibility to his readers, but more so to those whom he is writing about to reflect their anguish. to make them the focal point, and not his views or biases. this was not done well in this story. what made it worse were the interacts. hopefully if the writer should write about gujarat again, he will be more thoughtful in his telling. unfortunately, here, his words somewhere else of wishing that hindus and all their gods would burn are not the answer to what happened in gujarat. they are not the answer. fullstop.
an apology or non-apology from mr. hamid mahmood is rather irrelevant. we have suffered far too long from communal hatred and bigotry, in india and in pakistan. i just find it sad that as mittarji said, this story was reflecting more of the writer`s hatred and not the pain and anguish that was suffered by so many.
when a writer presents a story which is based on facts, he/she has a responsibility to his readers, but more so to those whom he is writing about to reflect their anguish. to make them the focal point, and not his views or biases. this was not done well in this story. what made it worse were the interacts. hopefully if the writer should write about gujarat again, he will be more thoughtful in his telling. unfortunately, here, his words somewhere else of wishing that hindus and all their gods would burn are not the answer to what happened in gujarat. they are not the answer. fullstop.
#85 Posted by Urstruly on August 9, 2004 7:00:08 am
NO JUSTICE

I know there is no chance for justice for her now. She died the death of a parasite, as she was considered and treated in her society when she was alive. One less parasite - good riddance. But I seek justice for others like her who weren`t as lucky as her; they are alive but die everyday. Probably Jawahra and Farzana Versey are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome or they are too scared to open their mouth but I must ask where are some 7000 - 8000 young Muslim woman who are still unaccounted for. No one has found their charred corpses. No one has found their limbs or torsos scattered here and there. Where are they? Who sold them to the brothels all across India. Who put them in Mandirs as Daasis, as religion-sanctioned prostitutes; to be sex slaves; to satiate the insatiable thirst of the hindu pandits. As if hindus themselves had a shortage of their own sisters to meet the demand. These unfortunate women, these pathetic excuse for a human being are condemned to die everyday. Who is speaking out for them. Jawahra you have been to India. Do you know where they are? When you meet them tell them that they have at least one brother who cries for them. Not only for them but he cries on the cowardice of his brothers as well for they have no heart to seek justice for their lost sisters. Tell them, their brothers have all died.
#84 Posted by stuka on August 9, 2004 6:33:27 am
``Hamid has merely stated what an overwhelming majority of Pakistanis think to be the case. ``
Even more proof of Pakistani Mass delusions. Just because u think so don`t mean it is so. LOL! But that may be too complex for low IQ Pakistanis to comprehend.
Abey India did not even massacre the 95000 pows IT TOOK IN 1971. Ofcourse looking back we should have turned them over to the Bangladeshi population. Would have made Gujrat look like Kindergarten. LOL!! Hindu violence on Muslims pales compared to the Muslim on Muslim violence.
Even more proof of Pakistani Mass delusions. Just because u think so don`t mean it is so. LOL! But that may be too complex for low IQ Pakistanis to comprehend.
Abey India did not even massacre the 95000 pows IT TOOK IN 1971. Ofcourse looking back we should have turned them over to the Bangladeshi population. Would have made Gujrat look like Kindergarten. LOL!! Hindu violence on Muslims pales compared to the Muslim on Muslim violence.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- nkg: Re: # 673 masadi... indians... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- Eklavya: "refrain from drawing chut!ya... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- nkg: #678.... GF Yeh, sometimes brothers misunderstand... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- harish_hyd: And yaar GF, these... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- nkg: Re: # 688 GF, Harish.... You... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
- majumdar: GF, Even if what u... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- harish_hyd: #56 by Goldfinger Kulharee, unfortunately... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
- Goldfinger: Re: # 17 Kulharee... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content